Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Indian Journal of Science and Technology, Vol 9(23), DOI: 10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i23/94124, June 2016 ISSN (Online) : 0974-5645
Abstract
Background/Objectives: This paper presents development of non destructive testing methods for calculating the
compressive strength of concrete. Methods/Statistical Analysis: The compression tests along with impact echo tests and
Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity (UPV) tests are carried out at different load which was the increased compressive loadat certain
interval on concrete cubes of various mixes. The frequency spectrum and the ultrasonic pulse time are recorded. A MATLAB
based code is used to calculate the maximum frequency of the sound signals corresponding to each impact echotest
under a certain compressive load. The graphs for frequency and compressive load are plotted. The graph for ultrasonic
pulse velocity on the various compressive load are also plotted for different samples of concrete. Findings: Important
observations are found from the graphs of frequency and ultrasonic pulse velocity. The frequency and ultrasonic pulse
velocity peak values were continuously found decreasing under the increase in the compressive load. After initial crack
formation with the further increase in load the frequency was found increasing trend but with showing a small increased
value. Whereas the ultrasonic pulse velocity was found reducing trend in nature. These plots give the clear indication
of crack formation. Application/Improvements: These graphs are used for comparison of variation of frequency and
ultrasonic pulse velocity to predict the undamaged and damaged state of concrete under compression. A mathematical
expression is developed between compressive strength, frequency and ultrasonic pulse velocity.
Keywords: Compressive Load, Frequency Spectrum, Impact Echo Test, MATLAB, Non Destructive Testing, Ultrasonic
Pulse Velocity
stiffness changes and hence damages in the material. It is of the ultimate load, whereasin high strength concrete it is
clear that the crack will reduce the stiffness. In addition to about 70% of the ultimate load. Because normal strength
this, damage will change the dynamic parameters such as concrete is more ductile when compared to high strength
mode shape and its derivatives. The mode shape is mainly concrete. The heterogeneities in the concrete also affect
associated with the Eigen parameters such as natural fre- the ultrasonic wave scattering and attenuation. In8 pre-
quency, damping values etc. In4 presented a mode shape sented ultrasonic evaluation of damage in heterogeneous
based method to identify the crack in reinforced concrete concrete materials. In their study, they found that small
beams5. Describes damage detection of flexural structural heterogeneities do not increase the ultrasonic wave scat-
systems using damage index method. In their work, they tering and do not affect the attenuation. They have plotted
are efficiently used the changes in the natural frequency the velocity response under axial compression using labo-
to predict the damaged and undamaged conditions of the ratory results and finite element models. In both the cases
beam. The vibration methods are not so accurate. In gen- the velocity variation is almost same. UPV can effectively
eral, the accuracy of vibration based methods are depends used for the determination of depth of crack in concrete.
on the type of sensors used, number of sensors, quality of In9 pointed out the theoretical expression used to calcu-
sensor, arrangement of sensors, surrounding conditions late the depth of surface cracks in concrete.
etc.
Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity (UPV) is being used to
detect and predict the damage in concrete. In this test,
2. Materials Used
the time travel of an ultrasonic pulse through concrete is Concrete cubes with different mixes are used for both
measured. Then the velocity is calculated from the fun- impact echo test and ultrasonic pulse velocity test under
damental relation. Higher velocity is obtained when the axial compression. In this paper, mainly ten types of
concrete is of good quality in terms of homogeneity, uni- mixes are used. For each mix, twenty four samples are
formity, density etc. Damaged concrete shows less velocity. tested. Concrete cubes of size 10cubic cm are used for all
In6 described a damage assessment FRP-encased concrete samples. The details of the mixes are given in Table 1.
using UPV. From their experiment, it is clear that there Notation Used:
is a significant reduction in the ultrasonic pulse velocity
after a particular value of load for both plain concrete and 1. M-40-20 represents, M for mix of the concrete con-
FRP-encased concrete under monotonic loading. They are taining 0.1% fiber, 40% of sand is replaced by fly ash
also explained the comparison of UPV response for both and 20% of sand is replaced by pond ash.
type of concrete. Ultrasonic velocity response depends 2. C-20-10 represents, C for mix of the concrete con-
on the type of concrete. In7 presented that the velocity taining no fiber, 20% of sand is replaced by fly ash
reduction in normal strength concrete occurs at 30-40% and 10% of sand is replaced by pond ash.
Table 1. Mix proportion details of different samples used for the experiment
Sl No. Mix Cement Sand Aggregate Fly Ash Pond Ash Fiber Water
(kg/m3) (kg/m3) (kg/m3) (kg/m3) (kg/m3) (kg/m3) (kg/m3)
2 Vol 9 (23) | June 2016 | www.indjst.org Indian Journal of Science and Technology
P. H. Arundas and U. K. Dewangan
Concrete Specimen
Transducer b
Rebound Hammer
Figure 2. Schematic diagram showing axial compression
Fixed Head for Axial Compression along with impact echo test and UPV test. (a) Compression
along with impact echo test. (b) Compression along with
a UPV test.
Concrete Specimen
Vol 9 (23) | June 2016 | www.indjst.org Indian Journal of Science and Technology 3
Compressive Strength of Concrete based on Ultrasonic and Impact Echo Test
4 Vol 9 (23) | June 2016 | www.indjst.org Indian Journal of Science and Technology
P. H. Arundas and U. K. Dewangan
quency to very low values (see Figure 3(a), (b), (c) and
(d)). Here we can say that, after concrete is failed the stiff-
ness of concrete is reduced deeply. Hence the frequency
also reduced to very low value.
Vol 9 (23) | June 2016 | www.indjst.org Indian Journal of Science and Technology 5
Compressive Strength of Concrete based on Ultrasonic and Impact Echo Test
5. Conclusion
Non destructive tests using impact echo and ultrasonic
pulse velocity tests were carried out for the prediction of
compressive strength of concrete. A mathematical expres-
sion is developed using the liner regression analysis for
calculating compressive strength of concrete.
The predicted compressive strengths were compared
Figure 5.The predicted compressive strength comparison to the actual compressive strengths. The values were found
with the actual compressive strength of concrete. to be very close to the actual compressive strengths. From
the frequency response and ultrasonic pulse velocity
using linear regression analysis. The regression analysis responseof different concrete samplestests, the following
is done from the values of frequency and ultrasonic pulse observations were made:
velocity at no loading condition. The result of the analy-
sis is given in Table 2. Actual compressive strength values • Compression reduces both frequency and ultra-
and predicted compressive strength values for different sonic pulse velocity values.
concrete samples using Equation 1 are given in the table. • Up to the initial crack formation, frequency
A bar diagram of the same is given in Figure 5. The math- reduction was observed in impact echo tests.
ematical expression for calculating compressive strength • After initial crack formation the frequency
using frequency and ultrasonic pulse velocity is given as, increases further if the load is increased in
6 Vol 9 (23) | June 2016 | www.indjst.org Indian Journal of Science and Technology
P. H. Arundas and U. K. Dewangan
impact echo tests. This is due to length reduction 5. Eraky A, Ahmed M, Anwar A, Saad A, Abdo A. Damage
of sample due to crack formation. detection of flexural structural systems using dam-
• The reduction in ultrasonic pulse velocity was age index method – experimental approach. Alexandria
observed in UPV test as an indication of crack Engineering Journal. 2015 Sep; 54(3):497–507.
formation. 6. Mirmiran A, Wei Y. Damage assessment of FRP-encased
concrete using ultrasonic pulse velocity. Journal of
• Inultrasonic pulse velocity test the pulse velocity
Engineering Mechanics. 2001 Feb; 127(2):126–35.
was found reducing deeply upto the failure.
7. Santhanam M. Ultrasonic characterization of damage in
concrete. tech science press. 2010; 3(2):111–25.
Hence one can observed the crack formation clearly
8. Pawel P, Smolarkiewicz S, Carnot L, Nogueira N, Kaspar J,
from the graphs. Therefore it can be said that the impact Willam W. ultrasonic evaluation of damage in het-
echo test and the ultrasonic pulse velocity test both can erogeneous concrete materials. European Congress on
predict the compressive strength of concrete. Computational Methods in Applied Sciences a n d
Engineering (ECCOMAS); 2000 Sep. p. 1–13.
9. Kalyan ST, Kishen CJM. Experimental evaluation of cracks
6. References in concrete by ultrasonic pulse velocity. 2013; 95(1):27–36.
1. Nagatha S, Miyagawa Y, Kanazawa K. Reduction of natural 10. IS 13311 (Part I)- Indian standard non-destructive testing
frequency due to flexural cracks or shear cracks in rein- of concrete - methods of test. New Delhi; 1992. p. 1–14.
forced concrete members. 15th World Conference on 11. Sudhir K, Jain J, Murty CVR, Kamle S. Experimental study
Earthquake Engineering (WCEE); Japan. 2012. p. on natural frequency of prestressed concrete beams. 1997;
1-8. 19(9):718–23.
2. Hamad WI, Owen JS, Hussein MFM. Modeling the deg- 12. Arora SS. Study of vibration characteristics of cantile-
radation of vibration characteristics of reinforced concrete ver beams of different materials [M Tech thesis]. Patiala:
beams due to flexural damage. Structural Control and Department of Mechanical Engineering, Thapar University;
Health Monitoring. 2015; 22(6):939–67. 2012 Jul. p. 693–708.
3. Seth S, Kessler K, Spearing MS, Mauro J, Atalla A, Carlos 13. Saiidi M, Douglas B, Feng S. Prestress force effect on vibra-
ES, Cesnik C, Soutis C. Structural health moni- tion frequency of concrete bridges. Journal of Structural
toring in composite materials using frequency response Engineering. 1994; 120(7):2233–41.
methods. Nondestructive Evaluation of Materials and
Composites V. 2001Aug; 1.
4. Dawari V, Vesmawala G. Identification of crack damage in
reinforced concrete beams using mode shape based meth-
ods. Civil and Environmental Research. 2013; 3(13):24–9.
Vol 9 (23) | June 2016 | www.indjst.org Indian Journal of Science and Technology 7