Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/256846980
CITATIONS READS
14 92
5 authors, including:
1 Short communication
10 a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
11
12 Article history: Tantalum (Ta5+ ) doped CaCu3 Ti4−x Tax O12 (x = 0.05 and 0.10) ceramics were prepared by semi-wet route
13 Received 17 February 2012 using solid Ta2 O5 powder and metal nitrate solutions. Powder X-ray diffraction confirmed the major phase
14 Received in revised form 4 June 2012 formation of cubic CaCu3 Ti4 O12 ceramic in the doped samples sintered at 900 ◦ C for 6 h. Microstructure has
15 Accepted 10 June 2012
been studied using field-emission scanning electron microscopy. The grain size is in the range of 150 nm
Available online xxx
to 1 m for both compositions. Dielectric constant of the samples increases with increasing tantalum
16
concentrations.
17 Keywords:
© 2012 Published by Elsevier B.V.
18 Ceramic
19 Sol–gel preparation
20 Sintering
21 X-ray diffraction
22 Dielectric property
23 1. Introduction the second one involves the reduction of Cu2+ ions to Cu1+ ions 44
24 High dielectric constant materials are immensely useful for for the observed permittivity response have been also reported, 46
25 miniaturization of electronic devices which is a recent goal of such as bimodal grain size model [14], internal domain [15], elec- 47
26 our technological process. In this situation, a new dielectric mate- trode polarization effect [15], Cu-stoichiometry effect [16], and so 48
27 rial, calcium copper titanate (CaCu3 Ti4 O12 or CCTO) has attracted on. However, no mechanism is complete enough to explain the 49
28 a lot of interest in the past few years. It was reported that the similar dielectric response in both CCTO ceramics and single crys- 50
29 dielectric constant (ε) of CCTO ceramic is more than 104 and tals within low and high temperature range. Although this ceramic 51
30 that of single crystal CCTO is close to 105 and it remains rea- has extremely high permittivity, but one serious drawback pos- 52
31 sonably invariant over a wide temperature range from 100–600 K sessing high dielectric loss and low varistor voltage which hinders 53
32 [1–3]. Moreover, CCTO also has high potential for use in many its commercial applications [9]. Much work based on ion substitu- 54
33 electronic applications such as capacitors, memory devices, gas tion at Cu or Ti ion site in CCTO ceramics has been carried out in 55
34 sensors, humidity sensors, and varistors [1,4–8]. But the reason order to improve the dielectric properties and extend the under- 56
35 is still unclear what mechanism is responsible for the anoma- standing of the origin of giant dielectric response in CCTO ceramics 57
36 lous dielectric behavior. Among the published works, a plausible [17–21]. Most of the substitutions in CCTO ceramics offered the 58
37 mechanism accepted that the existence of semi-conductive grain significant effects on the values of dielectric permittivity, loss tan- 59
38 and insulating grain boundaries in bulk CCTO ceramics resulted gent and electrical conductivity of grain boundaries. In addition to 60
39 an internal barrier layer capacitance (IBLC) effect and this mech- their giant dielectric properties, CCTO ceramics also exhibited the 61
40 anism was supported by impedance spectroscopy analysis [3,7,9]. nonlinear current–voltage (I–V) relationship [8,22–27]. This behav- 62
41 This IBLC effect is strongly related to CCTO’s dielectric behavior ior was also observed in other related-perovskite oxides such as 63
42 [8,10,11]. Two theories were also proposed to explain CCTO semi Na1/2 La1/2 Cu3 Ti4 O12 ceramics [28]. The cause of this behavior is 64
43 conducting grains: the first one is related to the oxygen loss and the existence of intrinsic potential barriers at the grain bound- 65
aries, i.e. the Schottky barrier [8,29]. The nonlinear I–V behavior 66
∗ Corresponding author. Tel.: +91 542 6702868; fax: +91 542 2368428. grain boundaries and the overall dielectric response. Shao et al. also 68
E-mail address: kdmandal.apc@itbhu.ac.in (K.D. Mandal). reported that the stoichiometry played a crucial role in obtaining 69
Please cite this article in press as: A.K. Rai, et al., Mater. Sci. Eng. B (2012), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2012.06.002
ARTICLE IN PRESS
G Model
MSB 13175 1–6
2 A.K. Rai et al. / Materials Science and Engineering B xxx (2012) xxx–xxx
70 the high dielectric permittivity when donor-type dopant (Nb5+ ) and citric acid (99.5%, Merck, India) were used as raw materials. 100
71 was added [16,30]. Recent literatures reported the doping of CCTO Measured amount of titanium butoxide was dissolved in acetic acid 101
72 ceramics using supervalent metal cations such as Nb5+ and Ta5+ by stirring for half an hour at room temperature. A second solu- 102
73 which can modify their nonlinear I–V relationship and the total tion consisting of calculated calcium acetate, copper acetate, acetic 103
74 macroscopic electrical resistivity of grain boundaries (Rgb ) [31,32]. acid and ethanol was prepared by stirring for 30 min at 120 ◦ C and 104
75 The breakdown voltage obtained from I–V curves and Rgb decreased both solutions were mixed together. Appropriate amount of solid 105
76 with increasing concentration of dopants. Unfortunately, a very tantalum oxide powder was added to the mixed solutions with stoi- 106
77 few results are reported about the influence of supervalent metal chiometric composition of CaCu3 (Ti4−x Tax )O12 (x = 0.05 and 0.10). 107
78 cations doping on the nonlinear I–V relationship, dielectric prop- Citric acid (equivalent to metal ions) was then added to this solu- 108
79 erties and resulting electrical responses at grain boundaries, as tion. The solution was heated to 80 ◦ C with constant stirring to 109
80 well as the microstructure of CCTO ceramics [31–33]. Moreover, evaporate the water, resulting in a highly viscous blue gel. It was 110
81 the mentioned literatures reported the conventional solid-state then dried in an oven at 100–120 ◦ C overnight to get a dry gel. The 111
82 synthesis of supervalent metal ion doped CCTO ceramics which dried CCTTO gel was calcined in air at 800 ◦ C for 6 h. The calcined 112
83 requires repeated calcination and sintering at high temperature powder was pressed into cylindrical pellets using a hydraulic press. 113
84 (≥1000 ◦ C) in comparison to chemical routes such as sol–gel and The pressed samples were sintered at 900 ◦ C for 6 h in air. Heat- 114
85 co-precipitation methods. ing as well as cooling rates were maintained at 5 ◦ C/min during 115
86 In the present work, we are reporting a systematic study calcination and sintering. 116
87 of Ta2 O5 doped CaCu3 Ti4−x Tax O12 (CCTTO) at higher concentra- The phase composition of the samples was revealed by using the 117
88 tions level (0.05 and 0.10 mol%) by semi-wet route at relatively X-ray diffraction analysis (Rigaku D/MAX–111A system) with Cu K␣ 118
89 lower temperature. This semi-wet route employs citrate–nitrate radiation ( = 1.5406 Å) and 2 range from 30◦ to 80◦ . Images of the 119
90 gel chemical method using Ta2 O5 solid powder. These samples are microstructure were studied using freshly fractured surface of the 120
91 characterized by powder X-ray diffraction (XRD), field-emission sintered sample by field-emission scanning electron microscope 121
92 scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) and energy dispersive X- (FE-SEM, S-4700 Hitachi). Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy 122
93 ray spectroscopy (EDX) techniques. The dielectric properties have (EDX) analysis was also performed on the grains. 123
94 also been discussed. Dielectric measurements were made using a pellet which both 124
surfaces were polished and coated with silver paint. An impedance 125
lyzer) was used to measure the dielectric constant (ε ), dielectric 127
Fig. 1. X-ray powder diffraction patterns of CaCu3 Ti4−x Tax O12 ceramics (a) x = 0.05 Fig. 2. FE-SEM micrographs of fractured surface of CaCu3 Ti4−x Tax O12 ceramics (a)
and (b) 0.10 sintered at 900 ◦ C for 6 h. 0.05 and (b) 0.10. (c) EDX spectra of CaCu3 Ti4−x Tax O12 ceramic (x = 0.10).
Please cite this article in press as: A.K. Rai, et al., Mater. Sci. Eng. B (2012), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2012.06.002
ARTICLE IN PRESS
G Model
MSB 13175 1–6
A.K. Rai et al. / Materials Science and Engineering B xxx (2012) xxx–xxx 3
128 loss (tan ı), impedance and modulus in the temperature and fre- size in the range of 150 nm to 1 m and presence of agglomer- 156
129 quency range of 300–500 K and 102 –106 Hz respectively. ation. Disparity in grain size increases with increasing tantalum 157
relatively smaller than that formed by the ceramic method [38]. 159
130 3. Results and discussion
Fig. 2(c) shows the representative EDX spectrum of the whole 160
Fig. 3. Temperature dependence of dielectric constants for CaCu3 Ti4−x Tax O12 Fig. 4. Temperature dependence of dielectric loss for CaCu3 Ti4−x Tax O12 ceramics (a)
ceramics (a) 0.05 and (b) 0.10 measured at various frequencies. 0.05 and (b) 0.10 measured at various frequencies.
Please cite this article in press as: A.K. Rai, et al., Mater. Sci. Eng. B (2012), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2012.06.002
ARTICLE IN PRESS
G Model
MSB 13175 1–6
4 A.K. Rai et al. / Materials Science and Engineering B xxx (2012) xxx–xxx
Fig. 5. Frequency dependence of dielectric constants for CaCu3 Ti4−x Tax O12 ceramics
(a) 0.05 and (b) 0.10 measured at various temperatures.
Fig. 6. Frequency dependence of dielectric loss for CaCu3 Ti4−x Tax O12 ceramics (a)
0.05 and (b) 0.10 measured at various temperatures.
185 Fig. 4(a and b) shows the variation of loss tangent (tan ı) val-
186 ues at different selected frequencies for both the compositions of Impedance and modulus analysis separates the contributions 214
187 CCTTO ceramics (x = 0.05 and 0.10) as a function of temperature. It of the grains, grain boundaries and electrode specimen interface to 215
188 is clearly observed that the dielectric loss for the sample x = 0.10 is the total observed resistance and capacitance of the sample, respec- 216
189 lower than that of sample x = 0.05 over the entire temperature range tively [45]. Typical complex plane impedance plot obtained for both 217
190 of measurement. This is higher than that for undoped CCTO [1]. CCTTO (0.05 and 0.10) ceramics at 400 K is shown in Fig. 7(a and b) 218
191 There is an increase of dielectric loss with increase in temperature. respectively. Similar plots are observed at other temperatures also. 219
192 This is due to increase in conductivity with increase in temperature. One arc is clearly observed in these plots at 400 K which is corre- 220
193 Fig. 5(a and b) shows the variation of dielectric constant vs log sponding to the grain boundaries because it has larger resistance 221
194 frequency at a few selected temperatures for CCTTO ceramics. As (for sample x = 0.10, Rgb = 6.48 × 107 and Rg = 2.31 × 104 ) [46]. 222
195 can be seen from the figure, the dielectric behaviors for both the As can be seen from Fig. 7, the resistance of grain boundaries of 223
196 CCTTO compositions are almost similar in the entire frequency CCTTO sample increases with increasing the dopant concentration 224
197 range and decreases with increase in frequency. In addition, the from 0.05 to 0.10. This may be one reason for higher dielectric con- 225
198 dielectric constant for the composition (x = 0.10) is higher than the stant of sample x = 0.10 as compared to x = 0.05, because increase 226
199 other composition (x = 0.05) over the entire measured frequency in grain boundaries resistance increase the capacitance of grain 227
200 range. Both the CCTTO compositions displayed a broad anomaly boundaries and hence the dielectric constant. 228
201 nearly 1 kHz frequency at 500 K temperature. This anomaly will Fig. 8(a and b) shows the modulus plot for both the CCTTO sam- 229
202 also appear in both the samples at higher frequency with increasing ples (x = 0.05 and 0.10) at different selected temperatures. Two arcs 230
203 temperatures which is beyond our temperature range of measure- are clearly observed over the entire measured frequency range in 231
204 ment. both the samples. In fact, the first arc is the contribution of grain 232
205 Fig. 6(a and b) shows the variation of loss tangent (tan ı) vs boundaries whereas the second arc is the contribution of grains 233
206 log frequency at a few selected temperatures for the doped CCTTO [46]. It is also observed that with increasing temperature, the capac- 234
207 ceramics. The frequency dependence of tan ı shown in figure indi- itance of grains (Cg ) as well as grain boundaries (Cgb ) decreases. 235
208 cates that tan ı decreases rapidly over the entire frequency range. As a representative, the calculated capacitance of grains and grain 236
209 This may be due to the presence of small interfacial polarization boundaries of CCTTO sample (x = 0.10) are 19.35 × 10−12 F and 237
210 in these materials [44]. At lower temperature, tan ı is almost fre- 44.8 × 10−12 F at 350 K whereas 18.9 × 10−12 F and 42.47 × 10−12 F 238
211 quency independent up to 1 MHz. More importantly, the dielectric are calculated at 400 K respectively. As can be seen from figure, the 239
212 loss of the CCTTO ceramic with x = 0.10 composition is lower than capacitance of grains and grain boundaries increase with increasing 240
Please cite this article in press as: A.K. Rai, et al., Mater. Sci. Eng. B (2012), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2012.06.002
ARTICLE IN PRESS
G Model
MSB 13175 1–6
A.K. Rai et al. / Materials Science and Engineering B xxx (2012) xxx–xxx 5
Fig. 9(a and b) shows the variation of imaginary part of electrical 242
for both the CCTTO ceramics (x = 0.05 and 0.10). It is observed that 244
the height of the peak increases with increasing temperature which 245
with increasing temperature. The resistance of the grains and grain 247
boundaries can be calculated from the peak frequency using the 248
formula ωRC = 1 which has the same value as calculated by the 249
impedance and modulus plots. Therefore, the results from modulus 250
4. Conclusion 253
CaCu3 Ti4−x Tax O12 (CCTTO) (x = 0.05 and 0.10) samples were syn- 254
Ta2 O5 powder were used for preparation of CCTTO samples. XRD 256
analysis confirmed the major phase formation of CCTO in the pre- 257
pared CCTTO samples with the presence of CuO and TiO2 secondary 258
with increasing the dopant concentrations. This may be the rea- 263
son for increase of dielectric constant with increasing the tantalum 264
concentrations. 265
References 266
[1] M.A. Subramanian, D. Li, N. Duan, B.A. Reisner, A.W. Sleight, J. Solid State Chem. 267
Fig. 8. Complex modulus plots M versus M for CaCu3 Ti4−x Tax O12 ceramics (a) 0.05 (2000) 323. 268
and (b) 0.10. [2] R.N.P. Choudhary, U. Bhunia, J. Mater. Sci. 37 (2002) 5177. 269
Please cite this article in press as: A.K. Rai, et al., Mater. Sci. Eng. B (2012), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2012.06.002
ARTICLE IN PRESS
G Model
MSB 13175 1–6
6 A.K. Rai et al. / Materials Science and Engineering B xxx (2012) xxx–xxx
270 [3] A.P. Ramirez, M.A. Subramanian, M. Gardel, G. Blumberg, D. Li, T. Vogt, S.M. [24] Y.H. Lin, J. Cai, M. Li, C.W. Nan, J. He, J. Appl. Phys. 103 (2008) 074111. 300
271 Shapiro, Solid State Commun. 115 (2000) 217. [25] P. Leret, J.F. Fernandez, J. de Frutos, D. Fernandez-Hevia, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 27 301
272 [4] C.C. Home, T. Vogt, S.M. Shapiro, S. Wakimoto, A.P. Ramirez, Science 293 (2001) (2007) 3901. 302
273 673. [26] W.C. Ribeiro, R.G.C. Araújo, P.R. Bueno, Appl. Phys. Lett. 98 (2011) 132906. 303
274 [5] M. Li, X.L. Chen, D.F. Zhang, W.Y. Wang, W.J. Wang, Sens. Actuators B 147 (2010) [27] Q. Zhang, T. Li, Z. Chen, R. Xue, Y. Wang, Mater. Sci. Eng. B 177 (2012) 168. 304
275 447. [28] P. Thongbai, T. Yamwong, S. Maensiri, Mater. Res. Bull. 47 (2012) 432. 305
276 [6] S. Kwon, C.C. Huang, E.A. Patterson, D.P. Cann, E.F. Alberta, Mater. Lett. 62 (2008) [29] T.B. Adams, D.C. Sinclair, A.R. West, Phys. Rev. B 73 (2006) 094124. 306
277 633. [30] J.F. Fernandez, P. Leret, J.J. Romero, J.D. Frutos, M.A. Rubia, M.S. Martin- 307
278 [7] D.C. Sinclair, T.B. Adams, F.D. Morrison, A.R. West, Appl. Phys. Lett. 80 (2002) Gonzalez, J.L. Costa-Kramer, J.L. Garcia Fierro, A. Quesada, M.A. Garcia, J. Am. 308
279 2153. Ceram. Soc. 92 (2009) 2311. 309
280 [8] S.Y. Cheng, I.D. Kim, S.J. Kang, Nat. Mater. 3 (2004) 774. [31] S.Y. Chung, J.-H. Choi, J.-K. Choi, Appl. Phys. Lett. 91 (2007) 091912. 310
281 [9] T.B. Adams, D.C. Sinclair, A.R. West, Adv. Mater. 14 (2002) 1321. [32] P. Leret, J.F. Fernandez, J. de Frutos, D. Fernı̌andez-Hevia, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 27 311
282 [10] L. Ni, X.M. Chen, X. Liu, R. Hou, Solid State Commun. 139 (2006) 45. (2007) 3901. 312
283 [11] M. Li, A. Feteira, D.C. Sinclair, A.R. West, Appl. Phys. Lett. 88 (2006) 232903. [33] P. Thongbai, J. Jumpatama, T. Yamwong, S. Maensiri, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. (2012), Q2 313
284 [12] J. Li, M.A. Subramanian, H.D. Rosenfeld, C.Y. Jones, B.H. Toby, A.W. Sleight, Chem. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2012.02.048. 314
285 Mater. 16 (2004) 5223. [34] S. Guillemet-Fritsch, T. Lebey, M. Boulos, B. Durand, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 26 (2006) 315
286 [13] T.B. Adams, D.C. Sinclair, A.R. West, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 89 (2006) 2833. 1245. 316
287 [14] M.J. Pan, B.A. Bender, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 88 (2005) 2611. [35] A.K. Dubey, P. Singh, S. Singh, D. Kumar, O. Parkash, J. Alloys Compd. 509 (2011) 317
288 [15] T.T. Fang, C.P. Liu, Chem. Mater. 17 (2005) 5167. 3899. 318
289 [16] S.F. Shao, J.L. Zhang, P. Zheng, C.L. Wang, Solid State Commun. 142 (2007) [36] L. Liu, H. Fan, P. Fang, L. Jin, Solid State Commun. 142 (2007) 573. 319
290 281. [37] L. Marchin, S. Guillemet-Fritsch, B. Durand, Prog. Solid State Chem. 36 (2007) 320
291 [17] D.S. Fu, H. Taniguchi, T. Taniyama, M. Itoh, S.Y. Koshihara, Chem. Mater. 20 151. 321
292 (2008) 1694. [38] P. Jha, P. Arora, A.K. Ganguli, Mater. Lett. 57 (2003) 2443. 322
293 [18] C. Wang, H.J. Zhang, P.M. He, G.H. Cao, Appl. Phys. Lett. 91 (2007) 052910. [39] R. Schmidt, D.C. Sinclair, Chem. Mater. 22 (2010) 6. 323
294 [19] S.F. Shao, J.L. Zhang, P. Zheng, C.L. Wang, J.C. Li, M.L. Zhao, Appl. Phys. Lett. 91 [40] L. Ni, X.M. Chen, X.Q. Liu, R.Z. Hou, Solid State Commun. 139 (2006) 45. 324
295 (2007) 042905. [41] A.K. Rai, K.D. Mandal, D. Kumar, O. Parkash, J. Alloys Compd. 491 (2010) 507. 325
296 [20] M. Li, A. Feteira, D.C. Sinclair, A.R. West, Appl. Phys. Lett. 88 (2007) 232903. [42] S. Ke, H. Hunag, H. Fan, Appl. Phys. Lett. 89 (2006) 182904. 326
297 [21] L. Ni, X.M. Chen, Solid State Commun. 149 (2009) 379. [43] G.A. Samara, Condens. Matter. 15 (2003) 367. 327
298 [22] P. Thongbai, B. Putasaeng, T. Yamwong, S. Maensiri, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. [44] K.D. Mandal, A.K. Rai, D. Kumar, O. Parkash, J. Alloys Compd. 478 (2009) 771. 328
299 23 (2012) 795. [45] I.M. Hodge, M.D. Ingram, A.R. West, J. Electroanal. Chem. 74 (1976) 125. 329
[23] F. Luo, J. He, J. Hu, Y.H. Lin, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 93 (2010) 3043. [46] D.C. Sinclair, A.R. West, J. Appl. Phys. 66 (1989) 3850. 330
Please cite this article in press as: A.K. Rai, et al., Mater. Sci. Eng. B (2012), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2012.06.002