Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
00
0 1990 Pqmma pm. plc
Abstract-The dynamic stability of a beam elastically restrained at one end and free at the other subjected
to pulsating uniaxial and follower forces has been studied. The effects of the tangency coefficient of the
applied force, and the rotational and translational end-flexibilities of the beam on the regions of parametric
instability of simple and combination resonances have been investigated. The results reveal that these
parameters have significant influence on the dynamic stability of the system.
P(t)
* x,
L w
and where
rl(O,7)lBI+rl”‘(O,7)+p(7)?‘(0,7)=0
VW 7)//30- r1”(0,7) = 0
s”(l, 7) = 0
D,=d, Vi(thj(5) d5
S’0
(a - I)p(z)rl’(l, 7) - ~“‘(1,7) = 0, (4)
rl(r, 7) = i f,(T)rl,(t;)> (9
r=l
i,j=l,2 ,..., n. (9)
6
IT3 Simple resonance hz9 ~bina~ion resortonce
115
Fig. 6. Regions of instability for /3,= 1.0, & = 0.0, a = 0.0.
8 Key as for Fig. 2.
Fig. 4. Regions of instability for 1, = 0.0, fis = 0.1, a = 1.O.
Key as for Fig. 2.
w2, w, and (q + wl) have become wider, those at
0 N 2w, and 2w, have reduced in width as a result of
simple and combination resonance regions. A subtan- increase in the value of M:from 1.0 to 2.0. The
gential force with a = 0.5 has caused a reduction in parametric resonance regions in the vicinities of 2w,,
the width of all the instability regions as compared to (w, + q) and (wj + w,) are much wider and hence
those in Fig. 2. The stability diagram for tangential more important than those at 6 N 2w,, 2w, and
force (i.e. a = 1.0) is shown in Fig. 4. Simple reso- (% + 0,).
nance regions occur at 0 2: 2w,, 2w,, w2, 2w, and w,, The regions of parametric instability for four
while combination resonances of sum- and difference- different values of tl with /?, = 1.0 and PO= 0 are
type are obtained in the vicinities of (u+ + q), and shown in Figs 69. From Fig. 6 it is seen that, for
(0~~- q), (q - 0,)/2, (wj - q), respectively. It is u = 0, first-order regions of combination resonance
interesting to note that the (w2 - w,), 2w, and 20, exist near 0 = (w, + w,), (q +o,) and (w, + w,),
regions are wider than the other instability regions. while second-order combination resonance of the
An increase in the value of c( from 0.5 to 1.0 has sum-type is observed in the vicinity of (q + wj)/2.
increased the width of the (w2 - w, ) region and Simple resonances occur at 6 N 20,) 20, and oj . The
reduced the width of all other first-order regions. A 20, region is the widest of all the instability regions.
value of a = 2.0 (Fig. 5) is found to have given rise At do= 0.5 (Fig. 7), first-order sum- and difference-
to second-order combination resonances at type combination resonances appear in the neigh-
0 = (0, + 0,)/2, (w2 + w,)/2 and (q + w,)/2 in addi- bourhoods of (q + q) and (q - w,), respectively,
tion to the first-order combination resonances in the and no second-order combination resonances are
vicinities of (w, + q), (q + We) and (We+ w,). Also, seen. While the region at 0 E (q + wj)/2 is sup-
simple resonances are observed in the neighbour- pressed, the instability regions near 0 = 2w,,
hoods of 21~0,)2w,, wz, 2w,, 03, 2w,/3. No difference- (w2 + wj) and 2w, have reduced in width due to an
type combination resonance regions appear at this increase in the value of a from 0 to 0.5. For a value
value of IX.While the unstable regions near 0 = 20,~ of a = 1.0, only sum-type combination resonances
0
5 10 20 30 40 60 75 115
Fig. 5. Regions of instability for j, = 0.0, /$ = 0.1, a = 2.0. Key as for Fig. 2.
Ins~bility of an elastically restrained cantilever beam
60 65 5 15 30 35 60
8 &I
Fig. 7. Regions of instability for j?, = 1.0, & = 0.0, e = 0.5. Fig. 9. Regions of instability for p, = 1.0, /3s= 0.0, a = 2.0.
Key as for Fig. 2. Key as for Fig. 2.
occur near 19= (02 + o,) and (a+ + w,). Regions of parametric resonance regions. An increase in
simple resonance appear in the vicinities of 2w,, q, the value of 01from 0 to 0.5 (Fig. 11) has replaced the
Zw, and q. Analogous to the case of a = 0.5, no (wj + q) region by the (q - w,) region, while the
second-order combination resonances exist in Fig. 8. sum-type combination resonance region at
The first-order simple resonance regions are much @N (w2 + wX) continues to appear. Here, the 204
wider than those of combination resonance. All the
regions have become narrower with an increase in a 2
4
1
Fig. 8. Regions of instability for /I, = 1.0, & = 0.0, do= 1.0. Fig. 1I. Regions of instability for & = 1.0, ,& = 0.1, a = 0.5.
Key as for Fig. 2. Key as for Fig. 2.
474 R. C. KAR and T. SUJATA
-r A
uniaxial and follower forces. The results reveal that
the unstable regions for uniaxial force (a = 0) are
wider than those for follower force in most of the
cases considered. Combination resonances of sum-
(w,+w,l
type occur for uniaxial as well as supertangential
2
force, but those of difference-type do not occur. In
contrast, combination resonances of difference-type
appear predominantly for subtangential and tangen-
tial force. Whereas most of the regions of simple
resonance are wider than those of combination reso-
nance for uniaxial and subtangential force, the com-
bination resonances are observed to have increasing
importance under tangential and supertangential
force. In the latter cases, some of the combination
0-
5 10 30 55 60 resonance regions are found to be wider than the
8 regions of simple resonance.
Fig. 13. Regions of instability for p, = 1.0, /?@= 0.1, a = 2.0. An increase in the value of either /I, or /I0 causes
Key as for Fig. 2. shifting of all the instability regions towards lower
Instability of an elastically restrained cantilever beam 415
excitation frequencies, thus making the system more against rotation at one end and with concentrated mass
sensitive to periodic forces. Moreover, in most of the ai the other. J. Sound Vibr. 99, 144148 (1985).
cases, the combination resonance regions experience 3. M. J. Maurizi. D. V. Bambill de Rossit and P. A. A.
Laura, Free and forced vibrations of beams elastically
reduction in width while the regions of simple reso- restrained against translation and rotation at the ends.
nance become wider with an increase in either j3, or J. Sound Vibr. 120, 626-630 (1988).
B0’ 4. W. H. Liu, Approximate formula for determining the
fundamental frequency of a restrained cantilever.
J. Sound Vibr. 124, 204-205 (1988).
5. M. Giirgiize, Parametric vibrations of a restrained beam
with an end mass under displacement excitation.
REFERENCES J. Sound Vibr. 108, 73-84 (1986).
6. R. C. Kar and T. Sujata, Parametric instability of a
I. B. A. H. Abbas, Vibrations of Timoshenko beams with non-uniform beam with thermal gradient and elastic
elastically restrained ends. J. Sound Vibr. 97, 541-548 end support. J. Sound Vibr. 122, 209-215 (1988).
(1984). 7. K. Takahashi, An approach to investigate the instability
2. V. H. Cortinez and P. A. A. Laura. Vibrations and of multiple-degree-of-freedom parametric dynamic
buckling of a non-uniform beam elastically restrained systems. J. Sound Vibr. 78, 519-529 (1981).