Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 7

See

discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262257863

Compact Maximum Power Point Tracking of Solar


Photovoltaic Systems Using Analog ICs

Conference Paper · April 2013


DOI: 10.1109/TIIEC.2013.31

READS

74

5 authors, including:

Ramaprabha Ramabadran
Sri Sivasubramaniya Nadar College of Engine…
78 PUBLICATIONS 374 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE

Available from: Ramaprabha Ramabadran


Retrieved on: 09 May 2016
2013 Texas Instruments India Educators' Conference

COMPACT MAXIMUM POWER POINT TRACKING OF SOLAR


PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEMS USING ANALOG ICs

S. Ajay, A. Arunkumar, G. Deepika, S. Maneesha, R. Ramaprabha


SSN College Of Engineering, Chennai
s.ajay1608@gmail.com

Abstract Solar PV systems are used in many applications


due to the awareness of usage of renewable
energy systems. Because of the low efficiency
In this work, compact maximum power point of the PV systems, it is essential to operate the
tracking method of solar photovoltaic (PV) source at its maximum power point (MPP).
systems using analog ICs is presented. The Maximum power can be transferred when
analog circuit realizes the maximum power point source resistance is matched with that of load
tracking (MPPT) algorithm which exploits the resistance. This is done by using DC-DC
non-linear characteristics of PV array. This converters, called MPP trackers. Several MPPT
algorithm tracks the maximum power of the solar schemes have been proposed in literature [1]-
PV array and maintains the same irrespective of [11]. Among them common and popular tracking
the intensity and the fluctuations in the solar schemes are perturb and observe (P&O) or hill
radiation, thus improving the efficiency of the PV climbing [2], [6], incremental conductance [1],
system. To implement the proposed algorithm, short circuit current [5], open-circuit voltage [7],
TI components LM311, LM318 and SN7474 are and ripple correlation methods [11]. Some
used. In this work, the simulation of the improved techniques have also been proposed,
proposed system has been simulated using with the suggestion of reducing the hardware or
Pspice at different operating conditions and improving the performance [3], [4], [7]-[9]. All the
results are presented with hardware methods use any one of the digital processors to
implementation. implement it. This way is complex, may yield
slow response, sometimes fuzzy in nature if
MPP moves suddenly. In this paper an attempt
1. Introduction to develop the MPP tracking method based on
non linear dynamics which inherently follow the
The focus on renewable sources of energy has
MPP under steady-state and transient
increased due to the various drawbacks in non-
conditions, without trouble of any external
renewable sources. Society’s demand for an
control or perturbation [12].
affordable, environment friendly, continuous and
uninterrupted power supply has to be met by
power engineers. Power from solar PV array can 1.2 Proposed solution
supply such a demand. It is inefficient to use the
PV panel without any control mechanism The block diagram of the proposed system is
because of its non-linear characteristics. shown in Fig. 1.
Moreover, the output power depends on various
environmental factors like temperature, light
intensity and radiation which are beyond the
reach of us. Hence, to harness the maximum
power out of a solar PV panel within our
limitations, an algorithm employing MPPT is
designed using analog ICs. The main goal of
this paper is to improve the efficiency of the PV
panel by incorporating compact analog MPPT
system. The commonly used analog ICs are Fig.1 Block Diagram of the proposed solution
used to simplify the circuit. The voltage and current of the solar panel are
fed to the MPPT controller through voltage and
1.1 Technical Background current sensors as shown in Fig. 1. The

978-0-7695-5146-3/13 $26.00 © 2013 IEEE 134


135
DOI 10.1109/TIIEC.2013.31
controller sends signal to the buck converter Where current ripple, ∆I is 10% of Iin and
based on the current and voltage levels of the voltage ripple, ∆V is 5% of Vin. In order to handle
PV panel, hence controlling the duty cycle of the high switching frequency and low switching
converter resulting in the establishment of the losses, MOSFET IRF540N is used. The voltage
maximum power point of the PV panel [12]. follower circuit using TI LM311 counter balances
the loading effect on the MPPT Controller.
1.3 Organization of the report 10 kHz unity gain high pass filter using TI LM318
functions as a differentiator. TI LM311 performs
This paper has been presented in the following the comparator operation. The MPPT controller
sequence: varies the duty cycle of the buck converter
depending on the variations in the output voltage
ƒ Proposed Solution- A brief description on of the PV array and tracks the maximum power
the block diagram, functioning of each [12].
component and the design of the circuit.
ƒ Hardware Implementation- Selection of 3. Implementation
various components.
ƒ Software Implementation- Flow chart of 3.1 Hardware Implementation
the algorithm and the operation of the
circuit.
ƒ Results- Simulation outputs and results of The detailed schematic with all specifications is
hardware testing. shown in Fig. 3.
ƒ Conclusion
ƒ Acknowledgement
ƒ Reference
ƒ Appendix A- Simulation circuits.
ƒ Appendix B- Hardware photographs.
ƒ Appendix C- Cost of the project

2. Proposed Solution

The detailed block diagram of the proposed


analog MPPT system is shown in Fig. 2.
Fig. 3 Schematic Diagram of the proposed system

The specifications of PV panel used in this work


are: Isc= 2.55 A, Voc= 21.24 V, Imax= 2.25 A,
Vmax= 16.24 V, Pmax= 37.08 W under STC (i.e.
2 o
G=1000 W/m and T=25 C). The buck converter
is designed for 10 kHz switching frequency. The
other circuits like differentiator have been
designed for the same frequency. The circuit
Fig.2 Detailed block diagram of the proposed solution
shown in Fig. 3 has been implemented and
tested for different environmental conditions and
The current and the voltage of the PV panel the results are presented in Section 5.
available are 2 A and 16 V at maximum power
2
point under insolation level, G=900 W/m and
o
temperature, T=30 C (SOLKAR 3635 model).
3.2 Software Implementation
Buck converter is designed for this rating. To
design the values of inductance and The PV panel has been implemented using
capacitance, the formulae used are Pspice software with one diode model (Fig. 14 in
Appendix A). The flow chart for tracking MPP
Vout Vin Vout using the proposed circuit is shown in Fig. 4
L (1)
f Vin L which is self explanatory.
Vout Vin Vout
C (2)
8 f L Vin V

136
135
Fig. 6 Power-Voltage characteristics of PV panel

The simulation results of different parameters


like input voltage, input current, output
voltage, output current, input power and
output power are shown vide Fig. 7 to Fig. 9.
Fig.4 Flow chart of MPPT Algorithm

In this algorithm [12]-[14], changes in the voltage


of the PV panel will result in the corresponding
change in the slope dP/dV. Referring to the
power-voltage characteristics in Fig. 6, the slope
is zero at MPP, positive for voltage levels below
Vmax and negative for voltage levels above Vmax.
For positive slope, the switch will open and
charge the capacitor to shift the operating point
to MPP. For negative slope, the switch will close
and charge the battery to utilize the excess
voltage till V is just about less than Vmax. At
which point the switch is opened. The voltage Fig.7 Input voltage and current of buck converter
thus oscillates about the maximum power
operating point.

4. Results

5.1 Simulation Results


Characteristics of PV panel

The simulated I-V and P-V characteristics of


the PV panel are shown in Fig. 5 and Fig. 6
respectively for a particular condition. Fig.8 Output voltage and current of buck converter

Fig.9 Input and output power


Fig.5 Current-Voltage characteristics of PV panel

137
136
The above simulation results were obtained for
a particular condition. For other conditions also
the proposed circuit has been verified.

5.2 Hardware Results

Fig. 10 shows the output voltage and gate pulse


before tracking and Fig. 11 shows the same
before tracking.

Fig. 13 Output side measurements using single phase clamp


on fluke meter

From Fig. 12 and Fig. 13, it was found that the


output power is almost equal to the input power
and the converter losses were found to be 2 W,
whereas in simulation, the converter loss was
almost 1 W only. In practical testing the power
Fig.10 Photograph of gate pulse and output voltage before loss is high because the circuit has been
tracking implemented in bread board. This can be
overcome by incorporating the circuit using PCB
with the proper ordered components.

5. Conclusions

The proposed MPPT algorithm was realized and


implemented practically. The system was tested
at different conditions to check its proper
working for different environmental conditions.
The sample results were presented in this
report. The implemented circuit yielded
Fig.11 Photograph of gate pulse and output voltage after
satisfactory results excluding the losses in MPP
tracking
tracker. This can be rectified by reducing the
The waveforms have been traced using single losses with proper circuit implementation. The
phase clamp on fluke meter and presented in solution can be modified to address the issues
Fig. 12 and Fig. 13. in the maximum power point tracking of partially
shaded PV systems.

6. References

[1] Hussein K. H and Muta. I, “Maximum


photovoltaic power tracking: an algorithm
for rapidly changing atmospheric
conditions”, Proc Inst. Electrical Eng. –
Generation, Transmission. Distribution,
Vol. 142, No. 1, pp. 59–64, 1995.
[2] Hua C, Lin J and Chen C,
“Implementation of a DSP-controlled
photovoltaic system with peak power
tracking”, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electronics
Fig. 12 Input side measurements using single phase clamp
on fluke meter Vol. 45, No. 1, pp. 99–107, 1998.

138
137
[3] Kasa N, Iida T and Iwamoto H, “Maximum photovoltaic arrays”, Electronics Letters,
th
power point tracking with capacitor Vol. 36, No. 11, 25 May 2000.
identifier for photovoltaic power system”, [13] Kislovski A. S. and Redl R, “Maximum
Proc Inst. Electr. Eng. – Electrical Power Power Tracking using positive
Applications, Vol. 147, No. 6, pp. 497– feedback̍, IEEE conference, pp 1065-
502, 2000. 1068, 2004.
[4] Veerachary M, Senjyu T and Uezato K, [14] Mohamed Azab, “A New Maximum
“Maximum power point tracking control of Power Point Tracking for Photovoltaic
IDB converter supplied PV system”, Proc. Systems”, World Academy of Science,
Inst. Electr. Eng. – Electr. Power Appl., Engineering and Technology 44, 2008
Vol. 148, No. 6, pp. 494–502, 2000.
[5] Noguchi T, Togashi S and Nakamoto R, 7. Acknowledgements
“Short-current pulse-based maximum
power-point tracking method for multiple
We are thankful to the management of SSN
photovoltaic and converter module
College of Engineering, Chennai for providing all
system”, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electronics,
the facilities to carry out this work. Also we are
Vol. 49, No. 1, pp. 217–23, 2002.
grateful to Texas instruments (TI) for giving this
[6] Fernia N, Petrone G, Spagnuolo G and
opportunity to express our knowledge for doing
Vitelli M, “Optimization of perturb and
the project and their support
observe maximum power point tracking
method”, IEEE Transactions on Power
Electronics, Vol. 20, No. 4, pp. 963–73, Appendix A
2005.
[7] Dorofte C, Borup U and Blaabjerg F, “A
combined two-method MPPT control
scheme for grid-connected photovoltaic
systems”, Proceedins of Eur. Conference
on Power Electronics Applications, pp. 1-
10, 2005.
[8] Kasa N, Iida T and Chen L, “Flyback Fig.14 Pspice model of PV panel
inverter controlled by sensorless current
MPPT for photovoltaic power system”,
IEEE Transactions on Industrial
electronics, Vol. 52, No. 4, pp. 1145-1152,
2005.
[9] Sera D, Kerekes T, Teodorescu R, and
Blaabjerg F, “Improved MPPT method for
rapidly changing environmental
conditions”, Proc. IEEE Int. Ind. Electron
Symp.Vol.2, pp.1420-1425, 2006.
[10] Salas V, Olias E, Barrado A and Lazaro
A, “Review of the maximum power point
tracking algorithms for stand-alone Fig.15 Pspice schematic of the proposed system
photovoltaic systems”, Solar Energy
APPENDIX B
Materials and Solar Cells, Vol. 90, No.11,
pp. 1555-1578, 2006.
[11] Esram T, Kimball J. W, Krein P. T,
Chapman P. L and Midya P, “Dynamic
maximum power point tracking of
photovoltaic arrays using ripple
correlation control”, IEEE Transactions on
Power Electronics, Vol. 21, No. 5, pp.
1282-1291, 2006.
[12] Yan Hong Lim and D.C. Hamill, “Simple
maximum power point tracker for Fig.16 Realization of the Buck Converter

139
138
Fig.17 SOLAR 3635 PV panel

Fig.18 Hardware setup of the proposed system

The YouTube link of the video on our project is


http://youtu.be/ipP73qOQ3A8

APPENDIX C - Bill of Materials

S. No. Component Unit Cost (INR) Qty Total Cost (INR)

1 LM311 N 15.00 4 60.00


2 LM318 25.00 2 50.00
3 IRF540N 30.00 1 30.00
4 SN7474 7.00 1 7.00
5 74HC86N 7.00 1 7.00
6 AD633JN 288.00 1 288.00

140
139

Вам также может понравиться