See In re Am. Rivers & Idaho Rivers United, 372 F.3d 413, 418 (D.C. Cir.
2004) (agency must
respond to a petition filed under its own rules); Indep. Mining Co. v. Babbitt, 105 F.3d 502, 507 n. 6 (9th Cor. 1997) (“[A]t some level, the government has a general, non-discretionary duty to process the applications” provided for by statute.).
Norbert J. Dotzel, JR., D/B/A Dotzel Trucking Joanne Dotzel, D/B/A Dotzel Trucking v. Ernest Ashbridge John R. Bower Darren Crispin Salem Township, 438 F.3d 320, 3rd Cir. (2006)
Norris Manufacturing Company, A Corporation of The State of New Jersey v. R. E. Darling Co., Inc., A Corporation of The State of Maryland, 338 F.2d 326, 4th Cir. (1964)
National Tank Truck Carriers, Inc. v. Edward F. Burke, Administrator, Rhode Island Division of Public Utilities and Carriers, 608 F.2d 819, 1st Cir. (1979)
Government of The Virgin Islands Department of Justice v. United Industrial Workers, N.A., Seafarers International Union of North America, Afl-Cio Lawrence Acker, 169 F.3d 172, 3rd Cir. (1999)
Reichhold Chemicals, Inc., Petitioner-Cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent-Cross-Petitioner. The United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio-Clc, Etc., Intervenor, 953 F.2d 594, 11th Cir. (1992)