Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Chapter 3
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
This chapter covers the research design and methodology, including population,
sample size, sampling technique used, participants of the study, instrumentation,
validation, data gathering procedure and statistical treatment of data.
Research Design
After considering the objectives of the study, the researchers felt the appropriateness
for adopting both the qualitative and quantitative data gathering techniques in their
survey method, using the questionnaire as the instrument and supported by
qualitative data obtained through structured interviews. A combination of these
research design helped provides more data to work with an ultimately a more
accurate evaluation O’Neill (2006). Another reason for adopting both qualitative and
quantitative data gathering techniques was that the researchers believed that with
this type of method, they can provide a more accurate information and a more
detailed data that are explained through numbers and words, making the findings
more concrete. In short, the strengths of qualitative studies should be demonstrated
for research that was exploratory or descriptive and that stressed on the importance
of context, setting, and participants’ frames of reference (Marshall and Rossman,
2006)
In the contrary, research design essentially refers to the plan or strategy of shaping
the research (Henn, Weinstein and Foard, 2006), that might include the entire
process of research from conceptualizing a problem to writing research questions,
and on to data collection, analysis, interpretation and report writing (Creswell, 2007).
It provided the framework for the collection and analysis of data and subsequently
indicated which research methods were appropriate (Walliman, 2006). The most
common, useful purposes and main aims of research were exploration, description
and rational explanation based on data (Richardson, 2005 & Babbie, 2007).
Pasay City East High School
E. Rodriguez St. Malibay, Pasay City
Population
By definition, population is the group to which a researcher would like the results of
the study to be generalizable. It could also be set of all cases of interest (Richardson,
2005) and might be virtually any size or might cover almost any geographical area
(Gay and Diehl, 1992). Theoretically, researchers could specify an even finer
distinction of population called the study population (Wolfer, 2007).
The population for this study, for both the qualitative and quantitative methods, were
the Pasay City East High School administrators and faculty experts. To be exact,
there are 10 administrators and 14 faculty experts, which gains a total of population
of 24.
Pasay City East High School
E. Rodriguez St. Malibay, Pasay City
Sample Size
A sample was a subset of the population being studied (Richardson, 2005), that
included the process of selecting a few (samples) from a bigger group (the sampling
population) to become the basis for estimating or predicting a fact, situation or
outcome regarding the bigger group (Kumar, 1996). Samples should be as large as
possible, in general the larger the sample the more representative and the more
generalizable the results of the study were likely to be. Minimum, acceptable sample
size for descriptive research would be 10% of population (Gay and Diehl, 1992).
That being said, the researchers chose the 20% of the ten administrators and 21% of
the faculty experts to be their respondents. Thus, there will be two (2) administrators
and three (3) faculty experts that will serve as the participants of the study.
Sampling Technique
Burns and Grove (2003) refer to sampling as a process of selecting a group of
people, events or behaviour with which to conduct a study. Polit et al (2001) confirm
that in sampling a portion that represents the whole population is selected. Sampling
is closely related to generalisability of the findings. In this study the sampling was
non-probable and purposive. According to Parahoo (1997), in non-probability
sampling researchers use their judgment to select the subjects to be included in the
study based on their knowledge of the phenomenon.
Moreover, purposive sampling was used in this study. Parahoo (1997) describes
purposive sampling as “a method of sampling where the researcher deliberately
chooses who to
include in the study based on their ability to provide necessary data". This is because
the researchers believe that their chosen participants perfectly fits to be the
respondent because they are knowledgeable and skillful enough on this field.
As stated in the Table 1, there are 10 administrators and 14 faculty experts with a
total of 24 as the researchers’ population. From these groups, the researchers would
select a 20% of the administrator’s population and a 21% of the faculty experts’
population. Thus, the participants of this study is two (2) administrators and three (3)
faculty experts.
Instrumentation
The questionnaire was the main research instrument in this study, with the objective
to elicit as much related information as possible from the respondents. It would
contain enough questions to be able to meet survey objectives but not so many as to
be off-putting to respondents. The questions must be long enough to elicit the
information that was required but short enough to encourage an optimum response
rate (Johns, 1998).
Based on the above, a structured questionnaire was developed, covering as many
as possible the items that might point to achieving the objectives of the study.
Therefore, the research questionnaire was divided into four parts. The part 1
includes the ingredients, procedures, and the benefits (health and financial). The part
2, on the other hand includes the satisfaction of the participant in terms of the
product's taste, appearance and price. Lastly, the part 3 contains a table where the
participants can assess their competency in terms of knowledge, skills, and attitude.
Validation
To ensure that the measures developed in the instrument were relevant and
appropriate, the instruments were tested for its validity and reliability. Validity refers
to the extent to which an empirical measure adequately reflects the real meaning of
the concept under consideration (Babbie, 2007). This was supported by Henn,
Weinstein and Foard (2006) who said the most critical was whether or not the results
from a quantitative research study accurately reflect the phenomenon under
investigation. It was characteristic of a measure or protocol that assesses what it
Pasay City East High School
E. Rodriguez St. Malibay, Pasay City