Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
plant in Japan. The process involves three pri- this reason the benzene must be specially puri-
mary steps: the selective hydrogenation of ben- fied and the hydrogenation vessel lined with an
zene; the separation of the cyclohexene from inert material [55–58].
the unconverted benzene and the over-hydrogen- The mixture of cyclohexane, cyclohexene,
ation product cyclohexane; and the hydration of and benzene can not be distilled but must go
the cyclohexene (Fig. 4). through two successive extractive distillations.
The hydrogenation is carried out with a spe- The best solvent to use in these distillations has
cially prepared heterogeneous nickel catalyst. been the subject of numerous patents [59–62].
The reaction is run to about 50 % conversion, at The recovered cyclohexane could be converted
which point the product consists of about 35 % back to benzene, but is probably sold to other
cyclohexene, 15 % cyclohexane, and 50 % un- caprolactam and adipic acid manufacturers.
converted benzene. The selectivity is very sen- The hydration of cyclohexene is also per-
sitive to impurities such as sulfur and iron. For formed with a heterogeneous catalyst in a slurry
6 Cyclohexanol and Cyclohexanone
reactor. The extent of hydration is limited by the A sudden release of the hot cyclohexane to
equilibrium constant, which would restrict con- the atmosphere, (e.g., from the rupture of a pro-
version to about 14 %. The use of several addi- cess line or a break in the air oxidation vessel it-
tives to increase the conversion of cyclohexene self) results in an extremely hazardous situation.
to cyclohexanol has also been patented [63–68]. An incident of this type occurred at a Monsanto
The yield of this process from benzene plant at Pensacola, Florida in 1971. Fortunately,
to cyclohexanol is extremely high, probably the resulting vapor cloud was dispersed by the
greater than 95 %. Although byproducts are not prevailing winds before it could ignite.
a concern, the investment is significantly higher In 1974, a much more serious incident oc-
than that of a conventional cyclohexane oxida- curred at a Nipro plant in Flixborough, England.
tion plant. The fact that the product is cyclohex- A section of 50-cm pipe connecting two air ox-
anol, not cyclohexanone, could make it unattrac- idation vessels ruptured, resulting in the release
tive as the basis for a caprolactam plant. of a large cloud of cyclohexane vapor. About
30 s after the break occurred, the vapor cloud ig-
nited, and the resulting explosion destroyed the
3.5. Dehydrogenation of Cyclohexanol plant. A total of 28 lives were lost.
quantitatively determined by reaction with hy- synthesis of many insecticides, herbicides, and
droxylamine hydrochloride, followed by basic pharmaceuticals, as well as being a good solvent
titration of the hydrogen chloride that is liber- for many insecticides.
ated [84], [85]. Trade names: Hexanon, Hydrol-O, Sextone,
Pimelic Ketone, Ketohexamethylene, and K.
Methylcyclohexanols
dl-cis-2-Methylcyclohexanol [7443-70-1] 7 165.2 0.934
dl-trans-2-Methylcyclohexanol [7443-52-9] −4 166.5 0.924
d-cis-3-Methylcyclohexanol [5454-79-5] −4.7 174.0 0.917
l-trans-3-Methylcyclohexanol [7443-55-2] −1 175.0 0.915
cis-4-Methylcyclohexanol [7731-28-4] −9.2 174.0 0.912
trans-4-Methylcyclohexanol [7731-29-5] 173.0 0.916
Commercial mixture [25639-42-3] −50 173 – 175 0.913 154
Methylcyclohexanones
dl-2-Methylcyclohexanone [583-60-8] −13.9 165.1 0.925 1.4440 48
(25 ◦ C)
dl-3-Methylcyclohexanone [591-24-2] −73.5 170.0 0.920 1.4449 48
(20 ◦ C)
4-Methylcyclohexanone [589-92-4] −40.6 171.3 0.916 1.4451 48
(20 ◦ C)
Commercial mixture [1331-22-2] 165 – 171 0.918 – 0.925
for the same material in November 1986 was injury [107], [108]. Cyclohexanol can be ab-
$ 1.25/kg [100]. sorbed through the skin in toxic amounts, and
This sales volume for either chemical does extensive exposure can cause tremors, narcosis,
not represent capacity, as the vast majority of hypothermia, and death [92]. Cyclohexanone is
both are consumed within the manufacturing only moderately irritating to the skin. Defatting
companies to make adipic acid or caprolactam. and dermatitis of the skin occurred when animals
In 1992, the worldwide capacity for cyclo- were exposed for long periods of time [109].
hexanol-cyclohexanone manufacture was about
3.2 × 106 t. Of that total, about 58 % was used Derivatives. Commercial methylcyclohex-
for caprolactam manufacture, 40 % for adipic anol is low in toxicity, and the ACGIH has
acid manufacture, and the remainder was sold set TLVs of 75 ppm, 350 mg/m3 (STEL) and
for other uses. 50 ppm, 235 mg/m3 (8-h TWA). The MAK value
is the same as the TLV/TWA value [91]. Exces-
sive exposure causes headaches and eye and
10. Toxicology and Occupational nose irritation.
Health Methylcyclohexanones are moderately toxic
to laboratory animals and cause eye, nose,
Cyclohexanol and cyclohexanone are mod- and throat irritation; they have produced
erately toxic [102], but have no apparent car- corneal damage to the eyes of rabbits. The
cinogenicity. For cyclohexanol the OSHA TLV single-dose oral LD50 for rats is ca. 2 g/kg
for exposure to vapor for 8 h is 50 ppm [103]. [92]. 2-Methylcyclohexanone may be absorbed
The ACGIH has established TLV-TWA values through the skin. Its TLV/TWA and MAK are
for exposure to cyclohexanol vapor of 50 ppm, 50 ppm, 230 mg/m3 ; the TLV/STEL is 75 ppm,
200 mg/m3 [104]. The TLV-TWA for cyclohex- 345 mg/m3. .
anone is 25 ppm, 100 mg/m3 . The MAKs for Trimethylcyclohexanol has the same toxico-
both compounds are 50 ppm, 200 mg/m3 . logical properties as methylcyclohexanol, but
Excessive exposure to vapor of either chem- because of its lower vapor pressure, it presents
ical results in irritation to the eyes, nose, and fewer hazards. Neither TLV nor MAK values
throat. Exposure of animals to a high concentra- have been adopted.
tion of cyclohexanol vapor resulted in irritation, The toxicity of trimethylcyclohexanone is
lacrimation, salivation, lethargy, incoordination, similar to that of methylcyclohexanone, but its
narcosis, mild convulsions, and, in some cases, lower vapor pressure makes it less dangerous to
death. Degenerative changes were noted in the handle.
brain, kidney, and liver of rabbits exposed re-
peatedly to high vapor concentrations of cyclo-
hexanol [102].
Exposure of animals to high concentrations
11. References
of cyclohexanone vapor also resulted in irri- 1. G. Schwarzenbach, E. Felder, Helv. Chim.
tation, lacrimation, and salivation. Decreased Acta 27 (1944) 1044. G. Schwarzenbach, C.
heart rate and depression of the CNS were also Witwer, Helv. Chim. Acta 30 (1947) 659, 669.
noted [105]. Degenerative changes were noted 2. BASF, DE 352 439, 1913.
in the kidney and liver of monkeys and rabbits 3. Tetralin Ges., DE 299 012, 1916.
exposed repeatedly to high vapor concentrations 4. Chem. Tech. (Leipzig) 18 (1966) no. 10,
of cyclohexanone. 608 – 613.
For single dosages of cyclohexanol, the oral 5. Stamicarbon, US 3 305 586, 1967 (P. Bernard).
LD50 for rats is 2.06 g/kg [106] and the min- 6. Stamicarbon, GB 890 095, 1960.
imum lethal dose for rabbits is 2.4 g/kg [92]. 7. G. D. Lyubarskii, G. K. Kervalishvili, Khim.
With cyclohexanone, the oral LD50 for rats is Promst. (Moscow) 7 (1972) 491.
1.62 g/kg [107] and the minimum lethal dose for 8. Allied Chemical Corp., US 4 092 360, 1978
rabbits is 1.6 – 1.9 g/kg [92]. (J. F. van Peppen, W. B. Fisher).
Cyclohexanol and cyclohexanone are moder- 9. Allied Chemical Corporation, US 5 015 787,
ately irritating to the eye and can cause corneal 1991 (J. F. van Peppen).
Cyclohexanol and Cyclohexanone 11
10. Du Pont, US 3 530 185, 1970 (K. Pugi). 38. Stamicarbon (DSM), US 4 238 415, 1980
11. Du Pont, US 3 957 876, 1976 (M. Rapoport, (W. O. Bryan).
J. O. White). 39. Stamicarbon (DSM), EP 0 004 105, 1979
12. Union Carbide, US 3 404 185, 1968 (T. (W. O. Bryan).
Adams). 40. DSM, CA 1 244 475, 1983 (Housmans,
13. Celanese, US 3 598 869, 1971 (P. J. Volpe, Vannispen, Plantema).
W. J. Humphrey). 41. DSM, EP 659 776, 1995 (H. A. C. Baur, U. F.
14. Du Pont, US 3 987 100, 1976 (W. J. Barnett, Kragten).
D. L. Schmitt, J. O. White). 42. Rhône-Poulenc, US 3 557 215, 1971 (J. P. M.
15. Rhône-Poulenc, US 3 510 526, 1970 (J. P. M. Bonnart, Y. Bonnet, P. P. M. Rey).
Bonnart, Y. Bonnet, P. P. M. Rey). 43. Rhône-Poulenc, US 3 694 511, 1972 (J.
16. Arco, US 3 949 004, 1976 (H. A. Sorgenti, Nouvel).
S. N. Rudnick). 44. Stamicarbon (DSM), US 3 927 108, 1975
17. Rhône-Poulenc, BE 731 125, 1969. (C. G. M. van der Moesdijk, A. M. J. Thomas).
18. Arco, GB 1 335 296, 1973 (H. A. Sorgenti, 45. Stamicarbon (DSM), US 3 937 735, 1976
S. N. Rudnick). (P. L. M. Dois).
19. Du Pont, US 4 675 450, 1987 (J. B. Lyon, G. T. 46. Rhône-Poulenc, GB 1 221 629, 1971 (J.
Stowe). Nouvel).
20. Monsanto, US 3 260 742, 1966. 47. DuPont, US 4 720 592, 1988 (U. N. Besmar, J.
21. Du Pont, US 2 851 496, 1958 (H. L. Cates, B. Lyon, F. J. Miller, M. T. Musser).
R. W. Wheatcroft, A. B. Stiles, J. O. 48. Halcon, US 3 317 614, 1967 (W. C. Long).
Punderson). 49. Halcon, US 3 665 028, 1972 (J. L. Russell).
22. Rhône-Poulenc, US 3 925 316, 1975 (J-C. 50. Institut Français du Pétrole, FR 1 556 979,
Brunie, N. Crenne, F. Maurel). 1969 (J. Alagy, A. Zuech, B. Cha).
23. Rhône-Poulenc, US 3 923 895, 1975 (M. 51. Institut Français du Pétrole, FR 1 573 834,
Constantini, N. Crenne, M. Jouffret, J. 1969 (J. Alagy, L. Asselineau, C. Busson, B.
Nouvel). Cha).
24. Rhône-Poulenc, US 3 928 452, 1975 (J-C. 52. Du Pont, BE 782 721, 1972 (W. C. Drinkard).
Nouvel, M. Costantini, N. Crenne, M. 53. BASF, DE 2 124 590, 1972 (R. Platz, W.
Jouffret). Fuchs, C. Dudeck).
25. Rhône-Poulenc, US 3 927 105, 1975 (J-C. 54. Ube Industries, JP 7 809 746, 1978 (T.
Brunie, N. Crenne). Kawahito, M. Tamure).
26. Stamicarbon (DSM), US 3 941 845, 1976 (W. 55. Asahi, JP 60 255 738, 1985 (H. Nagahara, Y.
Vvoskuil, J. J. M. van der Donck). Fukuoka).
27. Stamicarbon (DSM), US 3 987 101, 1976 (J. 56. Asahi, JP 90 016 736B, 1990.
Wolters, J. L. J. P. Hennekens). 57. Bayer, DE 4 414 328, 1995 (H. Fiege, H.
28. Stamicarbon (DSM), US 4 042 630, 1977 (J. Haerle, A. Klausener).
Wolters, J. L. J. P. Hennekens). 58. Sumitomo, US 4 665 274, 1987.
29. Du Pont, GB 777 087, 1957. 59. Asahi, JP 61 221 134, 1985 (Y. Fukuoka, O.
30. Rhône-Poulenc, BE 715 662, 1968. Mitsui).
31. Rhône-Poulenc, GB 1 229 734, 1971 (J-C. 60. DSM, US 4 927 974, 1989 (van den Brink, van
Brunie, N. Crenne). Geem).
32. Rhône-Poulenc, US 3 923 895, 1975 (M. 61. Sumitomo, JP 62 126 139, 1987.
Constantini, N. Crenne, M. Jouffret, J. 62. Sumitomo, JP 62 123 136, 1987.
Nouvel). 63. Asahi, EP 162 475, 1985 (M. Tojo, O. Mitsui).
33. Du Pont, US 4 326 084, 1981 (J. D. Druliner, 64. Asahi, JP 63 154 636, 1988 (O. Mitsui, H.
P. J. Krusic, S. D. Ittel, C. Tolman). Goto).
34. Du Pont, US 4 503 257, 1985 (J. D. Druliner, 65. Du Pont, US 5 321 155, 1994 (W. C. Drinkard,
J. Hermolin). G. C. Grunewald).
35. DSM, US 5 298 665, 1992 (H. A. C. Baur, 66. Sumitomo, US 4 691 064, 1987.
Hoogendoorn, Janssen, Ragten). 67. Sumitomo, US 4 716 253, 1987 (T. Shirafuji,
36. Phillips, US 2 931 834, 1960 (W. W. Crouch, K. Sakai, K. Hirose).
J. C. Hillyer). 68. Sumitomo, US 4 670 612, 1986.
37. BASF, GB 1 382 849, 1975 (O. A. Grosskinsky, 69. F. Andreas, Chem. Tech. (Leipzig) 18 (1966)
G. Herrmann, R. Kaiser, A. Kuessner). no. 10, 608.
12 Cyclohexanol and Cyclohexanone
70. J. W. Bruce, Ind. Chem. 1963, no. 3, 121. 94. VEBA, DE 1 229 510, 1963 (K. Schmitt, H.
71. Scientific Design, BE 598 094, 1960. Heumann, W. Pollack).
72. Monsanto, US 2 970 172, 1959 (D. R. Cova). 95. VEBA, DE 1 418 067, 1959.
73. Wingfoot Corp., US 2 218 457, 1937 (C. F. 96. VEBA, DE 1 418 074, 1959 (E. Rindtorff, K.
Winans). Schmitt, H. Heumann).
74. Du Pont, US 2 163 284, 1937 (W. A. Lazier). 97. VEBA, DE 1 468 693, 1963 (K. Schmitt, H.
75. Monsanto, US 2 970 172, 1959 (D. R. Cova). Neumann).
76. L. K. Filippenko, K. N. Belonogov, V. P. 98. VEBA, US 3 361 822, 1968 (K. Schmitt, J.
Gostikin, Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved. Khim. Disteldorf, H. Schnurbusch, W. Hilt).
Tekhnol. 13 (1970) 3. 99. Chemical Market Reporter, 1999 (Feb.15),
77. F. Laucht, US 2 338 445, 1939. Schnell Publishing Co., New York.
78. I. G. Farben, DE 743 004, 1940 (F. Laucht, O. 100. Chemical Market Reporter, 1986 (Nov.10),
Klopfer). Schnell Publishing Co., New York.
79. K. Smeykal, H.-J. Naumann, Chem. Tech. 101. C. S. Hughes (compiler): Chemical Economics
(Leipzig) 13 (1961) no. 3, 132. Handbook, SRI International, Menlo Park,
80. Allied Signal Corporation, US 3 974 221, 1976 CA., Apr. 1983, 638.7020-A.
(J. Duggan). 102. G. D. Clayton, F. E. Clayton (eds.): Patty’s
81. BASF, US 3 149 166, 1964 (G. Poehler, A. Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology, 3rd ed.,
Wegerich, H. Giehne, O. Goerhre). Wiley-Interscience, New York 1982,
82. S. D. Nogare, J. Mitchell, Jr., Anal. Chem. 25 pp. 4643 – 4649.
(1953) 1376. 103. U.S. Government, CFR 29, Washington, D.C.,
83. N. A. Cheronics, T. S. Ma: Organic Functional Jul. 1, 1978, Section 1910.1000.
Group Analysis by Micro and Semimicro 104. ACGIH (ed.): Threshold Limit Values (TLV)
Methods, Interscience, New York 1964, and Biological Exposure Indices, ACGIH,
pp. 493 – 496. Cincinnati, Ohio, 1986/1987.
84. J. Mitchell, Jr., D. M. Smith, W. M. D. Bryant, 105. H. Specht, J. W. Miller, P. J. Valaer, R. R.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 63 (1941) 573. Sayers: “Acute Response of Guinea Pigs to the
85. W. M. D. Bryant, D. M. Smith, J. Am. Chem.
Inhalation of Ketone Vapors,” U.S. Public
Soc. 57 (1935) 57.
Health Service, NIH Bulletin, no. 176,
86. United States Government, “Code of Federal
Division of Industrial Hygiene, 1940,
Regulations”, 49CFR172.101, Oct. 1, 1998.
pp. 1 – 66.
87. Kirk-Othmer, 4th ed., 49 (1993) 885.
106. F. Bar, F. Griepentrog, Med. Ernaehr. 8 (1967)
88. Toray, GB 1 402 480, 1975.
244.
89. A. K. Doolittle: The Technology of Solvents
107. H. F. Smyth, Jr., C. P. Carpenter, C. S. Weil,
and Plasticizers, J. Wiley & Sons, New York
U. C. Pozzani et al.: “Range Finding Toxicity
1954.
Data VII,” Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 30 (1969)
90. I. Mellon: Industrial Solvents, Reinhold Publ.,
470 – 476.
New York, 1950, pp. 521 – 522.
91. DFG (ed.): Maximum Concentrations at the 108. J. Pohl, Zentralbl. Gewerbehyg. Unfallverhuet.
Workplace (MAK), VCH Verlagsgesellschaft, 12 (1925) 91.
Weinheim 1986. 109. P. K. Gupta, W. H. Lawrence, J. E. Turner, J.
92. J. F. Treon, W. E. Crutchfield, Jr., K. V. Autian: “Toxicological Aspects of
Kitzmiller, J. Ind. Hyg. Toxicol. 25 (1943) 199. Cyclohexanone,” Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.
93. VEBA, DE 1 111 163, 1959. 49 (1979) 525 – 533.