Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
DELHI.
VERSUS
1. That the above noted criminal complaint is pending adjudication before this
Hon’ble Court and has been fixed today for filing of application under section 254
Cr.P.C...
cheque amount) through RTGS. However, the complainant has filed the present
complaint on false and frivolous grounds that the accused herein had issued the
cheuqe in question towards the payment of interest amount on the amount given
complainant itself stated on oath that he can produce the Income-Tax return filed
before the Income-Tax Authroities during the relevant period. However ,on
01.10.2015 he did not bring the ITR as stated and the same has been duly
4. That it is further submitted that the production of ITR is material evidence for the
adjudication of present complaint for the reasons that initially the amount given by
intended to be levied the interest at the time of repayment. The ITR filed by the
complainant will reveal that the payment made by the complainant to accused is
and ITR are material witness and records for the adjudication of present
complaint.
6. That the present applicant has been preferred bonafide and in the ineterst of
justice.
PRAYER
allow the present application and direct the complainant to provide the details of
his PAN ( Permanent Account Number) so that the accused may be able to
summons the official concerned for deposition before this Court, to prove the
ACCUSED
THROUGH
NEW DELHI
DATED
SUDHIR KUMAR SINHA
NEW DELHI-48