Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
6010
LABORATORY HIGH SCHOOL
(SLU-LHS) FACULTY and Present:
STAFF,
Complainant, PANGANIBAN, C.J.,
PUNO,
QUISUMBING,
YNARES-SANTIAGO,
SANDOVAL-GUTIERREZ,
CARPIO,
AUSTRIA-MARTINEZ,
CORONA,*
- versus -
CARPIO MORALES,
CALLEJO, SR.,
AZCUNA,
TINGA,
CHICO-NAZARIO,
GARCIA, and
VELASCO, JR., JJ.
ATTY. ROLANDO C. DELA
CRUZ, Promulgated:
Respondent.
August 28, 2006
x--------------------------------------------------
x
DECISION
CHICO-NAZARIO, J.:
3) Malpractice:
In notarizing documents despite the expiration of his commission.
According to complainant, respondent was legally married
to Teresita Rivera on 31 May 1982 at Tuba, Benguet, before the then
Honorable Judge Tomas W. Macaranas. He thereafter contracted a
subsequent marriage with one Mary Jane Pascua, before the Honorable
Judge Guillermo Purganan. On 4 October 1994, said second marriage was
subsequently annulled for being bigamous.
After the filing of comment, We referred[16] the case to the Integrated Bar
of the Philippines (IBP), for investigation, report and recommendation.
The IBP conducted the mandatory preliminary conference.
Equally worthy of remark is that the law profession does not prescribe a
dichotomy of standards among its members. There is no distinction as
to whether the transgression is committed in the lawyers professional
capacity or in his private life. This is because a lawyer may not divide
his personality so as to be an attorney at one time and a mere citizen
at another.[20] Thus, not only his professional activities but even his
private life, insofar as the latter may reflect unfavorably upon the good
name and prestige of the profession and the courts, may at any time be
the subject of inquiry on the part of the proper authorities.[21]
Section 27, Rule 138 of the Rules of Court cites grossly immoral
conduct as a ground for disbarment.
SO ORDERED.