Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 3

MIRANDA RIGHTS the facts and circumstances indicating, that the

These are the rights to which a person under custodial person to be arrested has committed it
investigation is entitled. 3. Escaped Prisoner or Detainee – When the person to
These rights are: be arrested is a prisoner who has escaped from a
1. Right to remain silent penal establishment or place where he is servi
2. Right to competent and independent counsel, ng final judgment or temporarily confined while
preferably of his own choice his case is pending, or has escaped while being tr
3. Right to be reminded that if he cannot afford ansferred from one confinement to another.
the services of counsel, he would be provided
with one STOP AND FRISK
4. Right to be informed of his rights This is a limited protective search of the outer clothing of
5. Right against torture, force, violence, threat, a person to determine the presence of weapons.
intimidation or any other means which vitiate Probable cause is not required but a genuine reason (not
the free will mere suspicion) must exist, in the light of the officer’s
6. Right against secret detention places, solitary, experience and surrounding circumstances, to warrant
incommunicado, or similar forms of detention the belief that the persons has concealed weapons.
7. Right to have confessions or admissions
obtained in violation of these rights considered EXCLUSIONARY RULE
inadmissible in evidence Any evidence obtained in violation of the Constituti
The “Miranda Rights” are available to avoid involuntary on shall be inadmissible for any purpose in any proceed
extrajudicial confession. ing.

ARREST FRUIT OF THE POISONOUS TREE DOCTRINE


Arrest is the taking of a person into custody in order This doctrine states that once the primary source (t
that he may be bound to answer for the commission of he tree) is shown to have been unlawfully obtained,
an offense. any secondary or derivative evidence (the fruit) deriv
ed from it is also inadmissible. The rule is based on th
How is arrest made? e principle that evidence illegally obtained by the St
It is made by an actual restraint of a person to be ate should not be used to gain other evidence, bec
arrested, or by his submission to the custody of the ause the originally illegally obtained evidence taints all
person making the arrest. evidence subsequently obtained.

UNLAWFUL ARREST PRELIMENARY INVESTIGATION


If the following requisites of a valid search warrant and It is an inquiry or proceeding to determine whether
warrant of arrest are NOT PRESENT: there is sufficient ground to engender a well-
1. There should be a search warrant or warrant of Founded belief that a crime
arrest has been committed and the respondent is probably
2. Probable cause supported the issuance of such guilty thereof, and should be held for trial.
warrant
3. Such probable cause had been determined When is it required?
personally by a judge Before a complaint or information is filed,
4. Judge personally examined the complainant and preliminaryinvestigation is required for all offense
his witnesses s punishable by imprisonment of at least 4 years, 2
months and 1 day, regardless of the fine, except if the
WARRANTLESS ARREST accused was arrested by virtue of a lawful arrest without
warrant.
1. In flagrante delicto – The person to be arrested has In case of lawful arrest without warrant: the compla
either committed, is actually committing, or is int or information may be filed without a preliminary
about to commit an offense in the presence of the investigation.
arresting officer.
2. Hot Pursuit – When an offense has infact just been
committed and the arresting officer has probable
cause to believe, based on personal knowledge Of
PREJUDICIAL QUESTION PLEA
Prejudicial question is one which arises in a case, the It pertains to the matter which the accused, on his
resolution of which is a logical antecedent of the issue arraignment, alleges in answer to the charge against
involved therein and the cognizance of which pertains to him.
another tribunal
Plea Bargaining
Elements of a prejudicial question: Plea bargaining in criminal cases is a process whereby
1. The civil action must be instituted prior to the the accused and the prosecution work a mutually
criminal action; satisfactory disposition of the case subject to court
2. The civil action involves an issue similar or intimately approval.
related to the issue raised in the subsequent criminal It usually involves the defendant’s pleading guilty to a
action; and lesser offense or to only one or some of the counts of a
3. The resolution of such issue determines whether or multi- count indictment in return for a lighter sentence
not the criminal action may proceed, than that for the graver charge.

DUTY OF THE COURT IF THE ACCUSED PLEADS GUILTY


PROVISIONAL REMEDIES IN CRIMINAL CASES When the accused pleads guilty to a capital offense, the
1. attachment (Rule 57); court shall:
2. preliminary Injunction (Sec. 58); 1. Conduct a searching inquiry into the:
3. receivership (Rule 59); a. Voluntariness of the plea and
4. delivery of personal property (Rule 60); b. Full comprehension of the consequences of the
5. support Pendent lite (Rule 61). plea;
2. Require the prosecution to prove guilt and the
ARRAIGNMENT precise degree of his culpability;
Arraignment is the proceeding in a criminal case, whose 3. Ask the accused if he desires to present evidence in
object is to fix the identity of the accused, to inform him his behalf and allow him to do so if he desires.
of the charge and to give him an opportunity to plead, or However, the defendant after pleading guilty may
to obtain from the accused his answer, in other words, not present evidence as would exonerate him
his plea to the information. completely from criminal liability such as proof of
self-defense.
Where is arraignment made?
The accused must be arraigned before the court where Note: This procedure is mandatory, and a judge who
the complaint or information was filed or assigned for fails to observe it commits grave abuse of discretion.
trial.
GROUNDS FOR SUSPENSION OF ARRAIGNMENT
How is arraignment made? Upon motion by the proper party on the following
Arraignment is made: grounds:
1. in open court where the complaint or information 1. The accused appears to be suffering from an
has been filed or assigned for trial; unsound mental condition which effectively renders
2. by the judge or clerk of court; him unable to fully understand the charge against
3. By furnishing the accused with a copy of the him and to plead intelligently thereto;
complaint or information; 2. There exists a valid prejudicial question;
4. Reading it in a language or dialect known to the 3. A petition for review of the resolution of the
accused; prosecutor is pending at the Department of Justice
5. Asking accused whether he pleads guilty or not or the Office of the President; provided that the
guilty. 6. Both arraignment and plea shall be made of period of suspension shall not exceed 60 days
record but failure to enter of record shall not affect counted from the filing of the petition;
the validity of the proceedings. 4. There are pending incidents such as:
a. Motion to Quash
b. Motion for Inhibition
c. Motion for Bill of Particulars
Note: The period of suspension shall not exceed
sixty (60) days counted from the filing of the
petition with the reviewing office.

MOTION TO QUASH
At any time before entering his plea, the accused
may move to quash the information or complaint.

The court is not authorized to motuproprio initiate a


motion to quash by issuing an order requiring an
explanation why the information should not be
quashed. The court has discretion to dismiss the
case if the info is not sufficient or on any ground
provided by law, or to dismiss the info for a
different one.

DOUBLE JEOPARDY
It means that when a person is charged with an
offense and the case is terminated either by
acquittal or conviction or in any other manner
without the consent of the accused, the latter
cannot again be charged with the same or identical
offense.

What are the elements of double jeopardy?


1. A valid complaint or information
2. A competent court
3. The defendant pleaded to the charge
4. The defendant was acquitted or convicted or the
case against him was dismissed or otherwise
terminated without his express consent.

Вам также может понравиться