You are on page 1of 1


INDIVIDUAL Project Report

Enter name and student number

Criteria Max Mark Fail Pass Credit Distinction High Distinction

(0-49%) (50-64%) (65-74%) (75-84%) (85-100%)

1. Title, background, 10
definition, ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
justification, aim and Incomplete OR Title, background, definition & Title, background, definition & Title, background, definition & Title, background, definition &
objectives/RQs insufficiently presented justification present; may be justification present; may be justification present; generally justification present; ALL are
OR inappropriate for the inconsistent but generally slightly inconsistent but consistent and presented in a consistent and presented in a
topic presented in an effective generally presented in a highly competent manner superior manner
manner convincing manner

2. Critical literature 20
review ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Incomplete OR Effective review of a limited Convincing review of an Highly competent review of a Superior review of a justifiably
insufficiently presented amount of suitable literature; acceptable amount of suitable justifiably good amount of good amount of suitable
OR inappropriate for the effective structure; may be literature; well structured; suitable literature; very well literature; excellent structure;
topic overly descriptive may not be critical throughout structured; generally critical critical throughout; clearly
and may clearly identify gaps identifies gaps to be addressed
to be addressed

3. Methodology 15
☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Incomplete OR Effective presentation of how Convincing presentation of Highly competent Superior presentation of how the
insufficiently presented the secondary material was how the secondary material presentation of how the secondary material was identified
identified and analysed; was identified and analysed; secondary material was and analysed; both identification
identification or analysis may both identification and identified and analysed; both and analysis are addressed in
be very superficial; basic analysis are addressed more identification and analysis are detail to enable replication;
methodological literature may than superficially addressed in detail; some excellent integration of
be included methodological literature methodological literature

4. Findings 15
☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Incomplete OR Effective presentation of Convincing presentation of Highly competent Superior presentation of findings;
insufficiently presented findings; structure may be findings; logical structure, presentation of findings; very excellent structure; fully
illogical, findings may not be generally consistent with aim good structure; consistent consistent with aim and
fully consistent with aim and and objectives/RQs and with aim and objectives/RQs objectives/RQs; excellent
objectives/RQs and/or secondary sources are and secondary sources may integration of fully referenced
secondary sources may not be generally referenced not be fully referenced secondary sources
fully referenced

5. Discussion 15
☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Incomplete OR Effective discussion of findings Convincing discussion of Highly competent and Superior and critical discussion of
insufficiently presented with reference to the findings with reference to the generally critical discussion of findings in light of the literature
literature reviewed; literature reviewed; complete findings in light of the reviewed; complete discussion
incomplete discussion and/or discussion and logical literature reviewed; complete and logical structure; highly
illogical structure and/or may structure; generally discussion and logical consistent
not be fully consistent; consistent; may lack criticality structure; consistent

6. Introduction and 10
conclusion ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Incomplete OR Effective and reasonably clear Convincing and clear Highly competent and clear Superior introduction and
insufficiently presented introduction and conclusion; introduction and conclusion; introduction and conclusion; conclusion; excellent integration
OR inappropriate for the may ignore aspects of considers recommendation, integrates consistent of consistent recommendation,
topic recommendation, limitation or limitation and further recommendation, limitation limitation and further research;
further research; uncritical research; may lack criticality and further research; critical throughout
generally critical

6. Written 15
communication, ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
referencing and Poorly articulated and/or Effectively communicates Convincingly communicates Highly competently Communicates ideas in a superior
evidence of tutor no demonstrated ideas; demonstrates an ideas; demonstrates a good communicates ideas; manner; demonstrates an
understanding of acceptable understanding of understanding of referencing demonstrates a very good excellent understanding of
engagement* referencing & the quality referencing & the quality of & the quality of sources; understanding of referencing referencing & the quality of
*Tutor engagement is of sources and/or no sources; evidence of engaging evidence of engaging with the & the quality of sources; sources; evidence of engaging
evidenced by attaching the evidence of tutor with the tutor once since tutor once since submission of evidence of engaging with the with the tutor at least twice since
logbook as an appendix; engagement submission of the proposal the proposal tutor at least twice since submission of the proposal
failure to submit this submission of the proposal
appendix will result in a
maximum mark of 14.5 in this

Moderation Additional comments:

Late submission
penalty (if applicable)
Total Mark 100