Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
net/publication/260151361
CITATIONS READS
23 1,343
5 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Social Exclusion and Working Memory in Gay and Heterosexual Men View project
Attitudes toward Lesbians and Gay Men in Sports-related Contexts View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Roberto Baiocco on 03 July 2014.
The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. All in-text references underlined in blue are added to the original
document and are linked to publications on ResearchGate, letting you access and read them immediately.
Journal of Family Psychology © 2014 American Psychological Association
2014, Vol. 28, No. 1, 118 –123 0893-3200/14/$12.00 DOI: 10.1037/a0035736
BRIEF REPORT
University of Ottawa Hospital for Sick Children and the University of Toronto
Leslie Atkinson
Ryerson University
A central tenet of Bowlby’s attachment theory is that early child– caregiver attachment is reflected in the
quality of the child’s interpersonal relationships throughout life. Schneider, Atkinson, and Tardif (2001)
conducted a meta-analysis of studies conducted up to 1998 to corroborate that contention. They found a
significant but small to moderate effect size (r .20). Their finding that studies of friendship bonds had
by the American Psychological Association
higher effect sizes than studies of other interpersonal relationships has important theoretical ramifica-
tions. The present brief report is a meta-analysis that covers research conducted for the same purpose
since 1998. The sample consists of 44 studies with a total of 8505 participants. The overall effect size r
of .19 (adjusted r .12; 95% confidence interval, .08 –.17) in the current study was similar in magnitude
to the effect size reported in the 2001 meta-analysis, documenting consistency in the predictive power of
attachment theory. However, we failed to replicate the moderating effect of friendship. One possible
explanation for these findings is that the friendships of school-age children and adolescents no longer
invoke very high levels of intimacy. Effect sizes are higher in studies conducted outside North America
than in U.S.- and Canada-based studies.
terpersonal relationships later in the child’s life (Bowlby, 1973). emotional development. Undaunted by such obstacles, researchers
However, the complexity of hypothesized intervening mechanisms invested heavily in research testing the varied outcomes linked
and their abstractness make it difficult to translate the complex with early attachment. Arguing for theoretical clarity, Thompson
components of this theory into empirical research (Thompson & and Raikes (2003) dispute the contention that early attachment
Raikes, 2003). Perhaps the most challenging obstacle is the reality should necessarily be linked to all aspects of subsequent adjust-
that internal working models—mental representations of the at- ment. Instead, attachment might be expected to predict intimate
tachment bonds—are not readily amenable to empirical measure- family and peer relationships most specifically. This contention
ment. Further, the processes linking early child– caregiver attach-ment must be weighed against evidence that early attachment affects
to behavior and relationships later in life act in interplay with
humans fundamentally and even physiologically (Diamond & Fa-
gundes, 2010). This suggests a wide array of sequelae, attenuating
arguments for a narrower position.
Susanna Pallini, Department of Education Sciences, University of Rome Schneider, Atkinson, and Tardif (2001) presented a meta-analysis
Tre, Rome, Italy; Roberto Baiocco, Department of Developmental and of 63 studies conducted up to 1998 on effect size linking attachment
Social Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy; Barry H. and children’s peer relations. They reported an overall effect size of r .
Schneider, School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, 20. This effect size was not moderated by method used to measure
Canada; Sheri Madigan, Hospital for Sick Children and the Department of attachment. There were two important participant effects: mean effect
Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Leslie At- size was significantly larger for middle childhood versus preschool
kinson, Department of Psychology, Ryerson University, Toronto, Ontario,
aged children. Of considerable theoretical import, effect size was
Canada.
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Susanna significantly higher for outcome measures pertaining to close
Pallini, Via Milazzo 11b, 00185 Rome, Italy. E-mail: susanna.pallini@ friendship than for other less intimate aspects of peer relations. We
uniroma3.it present herein a meta-analysis of
11
8
ATTACHMENT AND PEER RELATIONS 119
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
.
l
f
f
r
s
s
s
e
e
z
a
e
c
e
a
a
e
a
1
o
v
o
n
d
y
n
o
d
n
p
si
R
ct
al
at
al
ct
E
fe
ef
er
di
in
fe
ef
m
W
W
M
Results
120 PALLINI, BAIOCCO, SCHNEIDER, MADIGAN, AND ATKINSON
Meta Analysis
ATTACHMENT AND PEER RELATIONS 121
ren (Doctoral Attachment in infancy and
I p Dissertation). Retrieved personal space regulation in
r from ProQuest early adolescence.
t
o Dissertations & Theses Attachment & Hu-
References
p database (UMI No. man Development, 4, 68 –
3360141) 83.
o
S Allen, J. P., Marsh, P., doi:10.1080/1461673021012
s
tu McFarland, C., 3111
e
di McElhaney, K. B., Land, Barone, L., & Lionetti, F.
d
e D. J., Jodl, K. M., & Peck, (2012). Attachment and
s S. (2002). Attachment and social competence: A study
m m using MCAST in low-risk
autonomy as predictors of
ar o Italian preschoolers.
the development of social
k d Attachment &
skills and delinquency
e e Human Development, 14,
during midadoles-
d l 391– 403.
cence. Journal of
w o doi:10.1080/14616734.2012
Consulting and Clinical
it f .691653
Psychology, 70, 56 – 66.
h f Berndt, T. J. (2007). Children’s
a doi:10.1037/0022-
or one of its allied publishers.
s mother-child relationship, Marital conflict and the A (2002). Family systems emotions in romantic
o
C c social self-concept, and peer quality of young children’s g theory, attachment theory, relationships: A
t gr
h relationships in middle peer play behavior: The and culture. Family developmental perspective.
, es
o childhood. Merrill-Palmer mediating and moderating Process, 41, 328 –350. Journal of Personality and
C si
o role of parent-child doi:10.1111/j.1545- Social Psychology, 92, 355–
D emotional reciprocity and ve
l 5300.2002.41305.x 367. doi:10.1037/0022-
C . B
i attach- Rydell, A. M., Bohlin, G., & 3514.92.2.355
, e
n ment security. Journal of h Thorell, L. B. (2005). Smeekens, S., Riksen-
Family Psychology, 23, 130 – Representations of
a
& 145. doi:10.1037/
vi attachment to parents and Walraven, J. M., & Van-
m a0014972 or shyness as predictors of Bakel, H. J. A. (2009).
i
McElwain, N. L., Booth- children’s relation-
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association
M d ,
LaForce, C., & Wu, X. 3 ships with teachers and The predictive value of
a d
(2011). Infant-mother 1, peer competence in different infant
y l
attachment and children’s 57 preschool. Attachment &
D s e
friendship quality: Maternal 1– Human Development, 7, attachment measures
e
mental-state talk as an 58 187–204.
l
c
for socioemo-
intervening mechanism. 8. doi:10.1080/14616730500
e
h Developmental Psychology, do 134282
s i:
i 47, 1295– Schmidt, M. E., Demulder,
s 10
l 1311. doi:10.1037/a0024094 E. K., & Denham, S.
, .1
d McElwain, N. L., & Volling, B. (2002). Kindergarten
h 00
L. (2004). Attachment security social-emotional
O o 2/
and competence:
. o ab
parental sensitivity during .2 Developmental predictors
d infancy: Associations with and psychoso-cial
00
( . friendship quality implications. Early Child
99
2 I and false-belief Development and Care,
P
0 n understanding at age 4. e 172, 451– 462.
0 t Journal of Social and e doi:10.1080/03004430214
1 e Personal l 550
) r Relationships, 21, 639 – 667. , Schneider, B. H., & Amichai-
. n doi:10.1177/0265407504045
892 Hamburger, Y. (2010).
a
M Electronic commu-
t Milligan, K. V. (2004). .
A nication: Escape
i Attachment security and ,
t mechanism or
friendship quality in early
t relationship-building tool
childhood: A theoretical and
a R for shy, with-drawn
methodological e
c children and adolescents?
reconceptulization e
h In K. H. Rubin & R. J.
(Doctoral Dissertation). d
m Coplan (Eds.),
D e Retrieved from ProQuest ,
Dissertations & The-ses The development of
n shyness and social
database (UMI No. L
t withdrawal (pp. 236 –
NQ94358) .
Monks, C. P., Smith, P. K., & 261). New York, NY:
,
s Swettenham, J. (2005). Guilford Press.
e Psychological correlates of Schneider, B. H., Atkinson,
&
c peer victimization in L., & Tardif, C. (2001).
u preschool: Social cognitive Child-parent attach-ment
r W and children’s peer
skills, a
i relations: A quantitative
t l
view. Developmental
ATTACHMENT AND PEER RELATIONS 123
n
u
S 2
7
V
e
b
i
St 1
8
SV
u
(
D
or one of its allied publishers.
TeW
o
T m
e
W
oJ
V o
0
2
Z
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association
i
C
h
Received May 23, 2013
Revision received
November 27, 2013