Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
ISSN: 2455-3689
www.ijrtem.com Volume 1 Issue 2 ǁ March. 2016 ǁ PP
Abstract: The increasing global competition, lack of awareness and clear understanding of numerous varied domains and
challenging issues surrounding the managerial implementation process caused TESOL educational institutions to realize the necessity
to rapidly respond successfully to compete in the marketplace, meeting stakeholders' requirements and achieving a better competitive
advantage.TESOL educational institutions have to work hard on making their strategic and operational processes more efficient and
effective.For most, if not all, TESOL educational institution, achieving superior performance relative to rivals is the ultimate
challenge.Consequently, TESOL educational institutions need to change their operation system by motivating the interest of all
stakeholders, changing employees‘ attitudes, encouraging unity of purpose, involving creative problem solving, and making sure that
organizational goals and objectives are accomplished. And that gets us to conclude that if TESOL educational institutions improve
their system operation by adapting TQM and integrating work flow between top managerial level, middle managerial level and the
ELT community, there will be an effective well communicated work harmony, especially in the decision making process and in
developing more healthy culture across all the institution.
Key Words: TESOL, ESOL, ELT, TQM
1. INTRODUCTION
ESOL teachers are seen as a key organizational entity because of their share that can improve the TESOL educational
institution performance. Increasing customer satisfaction, profit and achieving a high competitive advantage is the ultimate goal.
ESOL teachers can be productive; however, it might also happen that their effort and collaboration is miscommunicated and
somewhat unproductive, leading us to the conclusion that the whole institution would have been more productive under different
circumstances. But, not all ESOL teachers are high performing teachers and often the benefits of recruiting qualified ones are lessened
by problematic communication and cooperation.So, it is essential for researchers and practitioners to know how to expand the
mechanisms of ESOL teachers' work with the managerial level. In particular, it is interesting to know, how ESOL teachers'
performance can be promoted and what factors are associated with productive and effective communication and cooperation between
them and the whole institution. ESOL teachers have too often been a second thought throughout the strategy making process. Yet the
success of any educational strategy hinges on getting it to reality rather than just an abstract wish list. And this gets us to conclude that
ESOL teachers can and should play a main role in the success of the institution. Although ESOL teachers have not been part of
strategy and policy conversations. Furthermore, ESOL teachers have been largely absent from the conversation around the decision
making process, yet they play a critical role in its successful implementation.
2. Literature Review
2.1 Stakeholders Satisfaction
According to the Stanford Research Institute in 1963, the term ―stakeholder‖ refers to ―those groups without whose support
the organization would cease to exist‖ (Freeman & Reed, 1993; DeWit & Meyer, 1998). According to (Rhenman, 1968) an
organization‘s stakeholders are those individuals or groups who depend on the company to realize their personal goals and on whom
the company is dependent for its existence. (Post et al., 2002) support that the corporation is an organization engaged in mobilizing
resources for productive uses in order to create wealth and other benefits for its multiple constituents, or stakeholders. Accordingly,
organizational wealth is understood as ―the summary measure of the capacity of an organization to create benefits for any and all of its
stakeholders over the long-term‖ (Post et al., 2002).(Watson & Gallagher,2005) suggest that early quality management models were
effective in helping to manage environmental changes (e.g. economic variables social variables) that caused the quality of products to
ebb and flow throughout the history of a given organization thus, serving to stabilize quality and enable greater stakeholder
satisfaction with the organization.It is not easy to find mutually beneficial relationship between organization and its stakeholders.
Quite often building a network of reciprocal relationships with all stakeholders is not simple (Svendsen, 1998). In most companies,
competitive pressures keep all eyes focused on the short term, making it extremely difficult to bring long-term issues to the forefront.
And collaboration means letting go out of control, which is always difficult for corporate managers schooled in the art of competition
(Svendsen, 1998; Margolis, 2001; Jones, 1999). An institution's interest could be best achieved through positive and effective
relationships with others. Institutions should tend to expand their interests to involve the needs and interests of all stakeholders, in
order to develop the mutually beneficial relationships. Internal systems and structures have to be in harmony to satisfy the needs and
interests of all stakeholders is an endless, continuous, and multidimensional way. Top management should always be on cooperation
with stakeholders, workers should recognize their responsibility in the relationship process. Establishment of integrated solutions on
the basis of the principles of total quality management offers alternative solutions and common place of interests, alignment or
balancing.
reach several benefits such as improving quality, enhancing productivity, or achieve better operating income (Corbett, C.J., Montes-
Sancho, M.J. & Kirsch, D.K., 2005).
development and implementation of a quality program. (Schein, 1990) mentioned that business school failure to teach relevant process
skills contributed to manager ineffectiveness.
5. Conclusion
The more TESOL educational institutions adopt TQM principles the more the 3Cs –communication, culture, cooperation –
will be fully integrated with the managerial operation upward and downward thus will optimize internal and external stakeholders'
satisfaction. This research explores and assesses the critical TQM principles identified in the literature review and past studies to
successfully adopt a TQM system. According the future researchers need to decomposition the degree of top management
commitment to support the total quality management role in making their effort effectively in improving and developing their
educational institution's culture with the right mission, setting a fully strategic plan involving and empowering ESOL teachers,
encourage ESOL teachers training and education and assign them with non-teaching tasks influences stakeholders' satisfaction
positively. Besides, a clear understanding of current and future customers' requirements and considering their continuous feedback
throughout a unity of purpose to sustain a high degree of customer focus impacts stakeholders satisfaction positively.
6. Recommendations
1. Management commitment
A quality implementation program succeeds only when top management is fully committed. (Bothe, 1988) points out that
although the top management does not have to be a quality expert, programs fail when the top management does not recognize th e
contribution these techniques make toward profitability and customer satisfaction.The commitment of top management is generally a
preliminary point for implementing and practicing TQM to enhancing performance of an organization (Ahire & Ravichandran,
2001).It is impracticable to adopt QM and improve performance without strong top management support (Flynn et al, 1995). Top
management carries the primary responsibility for commitment to quality and support efforts necessary to successful TQM
implementation (Crosby, 1979).
al., 2000; Chiu, 1998; Wilkinson, 1998; Dale et al., 1997; Hackman & Wageman, 1995; Marchington, 1995) through personal
involvement on problem-solving and decision-making.
References
[1.] Demirbag, M., Tatoglu, E., Tekinkus, M. & Zaim, S. 2006. An analysis of the relationship between TQM implementation
and organizational performance: Evidence from Turkish SMEs. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, vol. 17
(6), pp. 829-847.
[2.] TESOL QUARTERLY Vol. 40, No. 1, March 2006 - TESOL Methods: Changing Tracks, Challenging Trends. B.
KUMARAVADIVELU San José State University - San José, California, United States
[3.] Teacher Learning in Language Teaching. Edited by Donald Freeman and Jack C. Richards. Cambridge Language Teaching
Library – Cambridge University Press 1996 pp.197-198
[4.] Brown, H. D. (1991). TESOL at twenty-five: What are the issues? TESOL Quarterly, 25,245–260.
[5.] Binnie Smith, D. (1996). Teacher decision making in the adult ESL classroom. Teacher learning in language teaching.
In Teacher learning in language teaching, Freeman, D. and Richards, J. C. (eds.). (pp. 197 - 216) Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
[6.] 30 Years of TEFL/TESL: A Personal Reflection- "Jack Richards" 11-May-09 12:12:51 PM
[7.] Davidson, J and J. Tesh (1997). Theory and Practice in language program organization design. In Christison, M.A. and
F.Stoller (Eds). A Handbook for Language program Administrators. Burlingame, CA: Alta Books. 177-198
[8.] PetrosPashiardis, (1994) "Teacher Participation in Decision Making", International Journal of Educational Management,
Vol. 8 Iss: 5, pp.14 – 17
[9.] Littlewood, W T 1981. Communicative language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
[10.] Harmer, J 1991. The practice of English language teaching. New edition. London: Longman
[11.] Richard-Amato, P A 1996. Making it happen: Interaction in the second language classroom.Second edition. White Plains,
NY: Longman
[12.] J.M.Juran "Universal Approach to Managing for Quality", Executive Excellence, May 1989. Pp15-17
[13.] Batten, Joe (1994). A Total Quality Culture. Management Review 83 (May): 61-62 -
https://www.questia.com/magazine/1G1-15200325/a-total-quality-culture
[14.] Alexander Philip C,"The Journal for quality and participation Association for Quality and Participation, Business &
Economics , Vol. 13, 1990.
[15.] Ross E Joel,"Principles of Total Quality", Third Edition, 2004
[16.] LAMONS Bob, "Communication is key to Quality Program." Marketing News, No. 29 (August 1994)
[17.] D.H.STAMATIS Total Quality Service: Principles, Practices, and Implementation, FL: St. Lucie Press, 1996, p.34
[18.] Grover, S., Agrawal, V.P. and Khan, I.A. (2006), ―Role of human factors in TQM: a graph theoretic approach‖,
Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol. 13 No. 4, pp. 447-68.
[19.] Brown, M.G., Hitchcock, D.E. and Willard, M.L. (1994), Fails and What to Do about It, Irwin,Burr Ridge, IL.
[20.] Prajogo, D.I. & Sohal, A.S. (2004). The relationship between organization strategy, total quality management (TQM), and
organization performance-the mediating role of TQM. European Journal of Operational Research, 168, 35-50.
[21.] Prajogo, D.I. Sohal, A.S. 2001. TQM and innovation: A literature review and research framework, Technovation 21 (9)
539-558.
[22.] Kaynak, H., 2003. The relationship between total quality management practices and their effects on firm performance.
Journal of Operational Management 21, 405-435.
[23.] MAGAZINE ARTICLEJournal of Property Management-Total Quality Management By Rategan, Cathie
https://www.questia.com/magazine/1P3-588297/total-quality-management
[24.] Corbett, C.J., Montes-Sancho, M.J. and Kirsch, D.K. (2005): ―The financial impact of ISO 9000 certification in the United
States: an empirical analysis‖, Management Science, vol. 51, n.7, pp. 1046-1059
[25.] AL-Otaibi, A.G. (2000): ―Job Involvement, personal characteristics and performance among White-Collar employees in the
Kuwaiti civil service‖, International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior, pp. 211-233.
[26.] Lehr, Lewis, "One Step at a Time: Implementing a Quality Process," A Quality Revolution in Manufacturing, Industrial
Engineering and Management Press, Norcross, GA, 1988.
[27.] Oakland, J.S., Total Quality Management, London. Heinemann, 1989
[28.] Gore, E.W. Jr, 1999. Organizational culture, TQM, and business process reengineering: An empirical comparison. Team
Performance Management: An International Journal 5 (5), 164–170
[29.] Elashmawi, F., 2000. Creating a winning corporate culture: Experience inside the Asian telecommunications industry.
European Business Review 12 (3), 148–156.
[30.] Bellis-Jones, R. Hand, M. 1989. Are total quality management programmes a fact or a management fad?, Management
Accounting 67(5), pp. 36-37.
[31.] Lawrence M. Corbett, Kate N. Rastrick, (2000) "Quality performance and organizational culture: A New Zealand
study", International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, Vol. 17 Iss: 1, pp.14 – 26
[32.] Meyer, J.P. and Allen, N.J. (1991): ―Commitment in the workplace: Theory, research, and application‖, Thousand Oaks:
Sage.
[33.] Keys, David E. "Five Critical Barriers To Successful Implementation of JIT And Total Quality Control," Industrial
Engineering, January, 1991.
[34.] Mullins LJ (2005). Management and Organisational Behaviour. Seventh edition prentice Hall Wolfson Sir Brian (1998}.
‗Train Retain and Motivate staff‘, Management today, p. 5. Wilkinso A (1999). ‗Empowerment: Issues and Debates‘ QWL
News and Abstracts, ACAS, 11: 28-33.
[35.] Saraph, J.V., Benson, P.G., and Schroeder, R.G. (1989). An Instrument for Measuring the Critical Factors of Quality
Management. Decision Sciences,20(4), 810-829
[36.] Rohaizan R, and P.Y.Tan. (2011), The Practices of TQM Among MS: ISO 9000 Certified Company. 3rd International
Conference on Information and Financial Engineering IPEDR, 12: IACSIT Press, Singapore
[37.] Alexander, C. P., "The Sort Technologies of Quality," Quality Progress, November, 1989.
[38.] Newall D. and Dale, B., "The Introduction and Development of a Quality Improvement Process: A Study," International
Journal of Production Research, Vol. 29, No. 9, 1990.
[39.] Yu, B.T.W., To, W.M., & Lee, P.K. C. (2012). Quality management framework for public management decision making.
Management Decision, 50(3), 420-438.
[40.] Ahire, S.L., Ravichandran, T. (2001). An innovation diffusion model of TQM implementation. IEE Transactions on
Engineering Management,48(4), 445-64
[41.] Crosby, P.B. (1980). Quality is Free – The Art of Making Quality Certain: McGraw-Hill Book Company: New York.
[42.] Verhoef, P.C., & Lemon, K.N. (2013). Successful customer value management: Key lesson and emerging trends. European
Management Journal, 31, 1-15.
[43.] Abdullah, M.M., Uli, J., &Tari, J.J. (2008). The influence of soft factors on quality improvement and performance:
Perceptions from managers. The TQM Journal, 20(5), 436- 452.
[44.] Flynn, B.B., Schroeder, R.G. and S. Sakakibara, (1995), The impact of quality management practices on performance and
competitive advantage. Decision Science Journal, 26 (5), 659-691
[45.] Welikala D, Sohal A (2008). Total Quality Management and employees' involvement: a case study of an Australian
organization. Total. Qual. Manage. 19(6): 627-642
[46.] Sun H, Hui I, Tam A, Frick J (2000). Employee involvement and quality management. TQM Magazine. 12(5): 350-354.
[47.] Chiu RK (1998). Employee involvement in a total quality management programme: problem in Chinese firms in Hong
Kong. Manage. Audit. J. 14(1-2): 8-11.
[48.] Wilkinson A (1998). Empowerment: theory and practice. Pers. Rev. 27(1): 40-56.
[49.] Dale B, Cooper C, Wilkinson A (1997). Managing Quality and Human Resources: A Guide to Continuous Improvement,
2nd ed., Blackwell Publishers, Oxford, UK.
[50.] Hackman RJ, Wageman R (1995). Total quality management: empirical, conceptual and practical issues. Admin. Sci. Q.
40(2): 309-342
[51.] Marchington M (1995). Fairy tales and magic wands: new employment practices in perspective. Employee Relat. 17(1): 51-
66.
[52.] Cherrington, David J. (1995). The management of Human Resources. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
[53.] Svendsen, A. The stakeholder strategy: profiting from collaborative business relationships, 1998. 52 p.
[54.] Jones, T. M. Instrumental Stakeholder Theory: A Synthesis of Ethics and Economics // Academy of Management Review,
1995, No 20 (2), p. 404-437.
[55.] Margolis, J. D. People and Profits? The Search For A Link Between A Company's Social and Financial Performance / J. D.
Margolis, J. P. Walsh. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2001. 52 p.
[56.] Duran (1987), A large mixed integer production and distribution program, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.
28, No. 2, pp. 207-217. http://smartinvestorsreports.blogspot.com.eg/2012/03/barriers-to-total-quality-management.html