Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
7 Brayton Cycle
The Brayton cycle (or Joule cycle) represents the operation of a gas turbine engine.
The cycle consists of four processes, as shown in Figure 3.13 alongside a sketch of
an engine:
Figure 3.13: Sketch of the jet engine components and corresponding thermodynamic
states
The components of a Brayton cycle device for jet propulsion are shown in
Figure 3.14. We will typically represent these components schematically, as in
Figure 3.15. In practice, real Brayton cycles take one of two forms. Figure 3.16(a)
shows an ``open'' cycle, where the working fluid enters and then exits the device.
This is the way a jet propulsion cycle works. Figure 3.16(b) shows the alternative, a
closed cycle, which recirculates the working fluid. Closed cycles are used, for
example, in space power generation.
Figure 3.14: Schematics of typical military gas turbine engines. Top: turbojet with
afterburning, bottom: GE F404 low bypass ratio turbofan with afterburning (Hill and
Peterson, 1992).
Figure 3.15: Thermodynamic model of gas turbine engine cycle for power generation
Figure 3.16: Options for operating Brayton cycle gas turbine engines
3.7.1 Work and Efficiency
The objective now is to find the work done, the heat absorbed, and the thermal
efficiency of the cycle. Tracing the path shown around the cycle from - - - and
back to , the first law gives (writing the equation in terms of a unit mass),
Here is zero because is a function of state, and any cycle returns the system to
its starting state3.2. The net work done is therefore
For a constant pressure, quasi-static process the heat exchange per unit mass is
We can see this by writing the first law in terms of enthalpy (see Section 2.3.4) or by
The heat exchange can be expressed in terms of enthalpy differences between the
relevant states. Treating the working fluid as a perfect gas with constant specific
heats, for the heat addition from the combustor,
The thermal efficiency of the Brayton cycle can now be expressed in terms of the
temperatures:
(3..8)
(3..9)
(3..10)
Figure 3.17 shows pressures and temperatures through a gas turbine engine (the
PW4000, which powers the 747 and the 767).
Figure 3.18: Gas turbine engine pressure ratio trends (Jane’s Aeroengines, 1998)
Figure 3.19: Trend of Brayton cycle thermal efficiency with compressor pressure
ratio
Equation (3.10) says that for a high cycle efficiency, the pressure ratio of the cycle
should be increased. This trend is plotted in Figure 3.19. Figure 3.18 shows the
history of aircraft engine pressure ratio versus entry into service, and it can be seen
that there has been a large increase in cycle pressure ratio. The thermodynamic
concepts apply to the behavior of real aerospace devices!
3.7.2 Gas Turbine Technology and Thermodynamics
The turbine entry temperature, , is fixed by materials technology and cost. (If the
temperature is too high, the blades fail.) Figures 3.20 and 3.21 show the progression
of the turbine entry temperatures in aeroengines. Figure 3.20 is from Rolls Royce and
Figure 3.21 is from Pratt & Whitney. Note the relation between the gas temperature
coming into the turbine blades and the blade melting temperature.
For a given level of turbine technology (in other words given maximum temperature)
a design question is what should the compressor be? What criterion should be
used to decide this? Maximum thermal efficiency? Maximum work? We examine this
issue below.
Figure 3.22: Efficiency and work of two Brayton cycle engines
The problem is posed in Figure 3.22, which shows two Brayton cycles. For maximum
efficiency we would like as high as possible. This means that the compressor exit
temperature approaches the turbine entry temperature. The net work will be less than
the heat received; as the heat received approaches zero and so does the
net work.
The net work in the cycle can also be expressed as , evaluated in traversing
the cycle. This is the area enclosed by the curves, which is seen to approach zero as
The conclusion from either of these arguments is that a cycle designed for maximum
thermal efficiency is not very useful in that the work (power) we get out of it is zero.
A more useful criterion is that of maximum work per unit mass (maximum power per
unit mass flow). This leads to compact propulsion devices. The work per unit mass is
given by:
, and to find the maximum as this is varied, we differentiate the expression for
maximum work occurs where the derivative of work with respect to is zero:
(3..11)
Hence,
Plugging this expression for the derivative into Eq. (3.11) gives the compressor exit
The condition for maximum work in a Brayton cycle is different than that for maximum
efficiency. The role of the temperature ratio can be seen if we examine the work per
unit mass which is delivered at this condition:
To find the power the engine can produce, we need to multiply the work per unit
mass by the mass flow rate:
(3..12)
The trend of work output vs. compressor pressure ratio, for different temperature
Figure 3.23: Trend of cycle work with compressor pressure ratio, for different
temperature ratios
Figure 3.24 shows the expression for power of an ideal cycle compared with data
from actual jet engines. Figure 3.24(a) shows the gas turbine engine layout including
the core (compressor, burner, and turbine). Figure 3.24(b) shows the core power for
a number of different engines as a function of the turbine rotor entry temperature.
The equation in the figure for horsepower (HP) is the same as that which we just
derived, except for the conversion factors. The analysis not only shows the qualitative
trend very well but captures much of the quantitative behavior too.
A final comment (for this section) on Brayton cycles concerns the value of the thermal
efficiency. The Brayton cycle thermal efficiency contains the ratio of the compressor
exit temperature to atmospheric temperature, so that the ratio is not based on the
highest temperature in the cycle, as the Carnot efficiency is. For a given maximum
cycle temperature, the Brayton cycle is therefore less efficient than a Carnot cycle.
Figure 3.25: Ideal ramjet [J. L. Kerrebrock, Aircraft Engines and Gas Turbines]
In the ramjet there are ``no moving parts.'' The processes that occur in this
propulsion device are:
The ramjet thermodynamic cycle efficiency can be written in terms of flight Mach
number, , as follows:
and
so
This is true whether the blade row is rotating or not. The sign matters (i.e. angular
momentum is a vector - positive means it is spinning in one direction, negative
means it is spinning in the other direction). So depending on how things are defined,
there can be positive and negative torques, and positive and negative angular
If the blade row is moving, then work is done on/by the fluid. The work per unit time,
or power, , is the torque multiplied by the angular velocity, :
If torque and angular velocity are of like sign, work is being done on the fluid (a
compressor). If torque and angular velocity are of opposite sign work is being
extracted from the fluid (a turbine). Here is another approach to the same idea:
Then equating this expression of conservation of energy with our expression from
conservation of angular momentum, we arrive at:
Equation (12.3) is called the Euler Turbine Equation. It relates the temperature ratio
(and hence the pressure ratio) across a turbine or compressor to the rotational speed
and the change in momentum per unit mass. Note that the velocities used in this
equation are what we will later call absolute frame velocities (as opposed to relative
frame velocities).
where is the stagnation pressure, a measure of the total energy carried in the
flow, is the static pressure, a measure of the internal energy, and the velocity terms
are a measure of the kinetic energy associated with each component of velocity ( is
radial, is tangential, is axial).
The rotor adds swirl to the flow, thus increasing the total energy carried in the flow by
increasing the angular momentum (adding to the kinetic energy associated with the
Figure 12.5: Pressure and velocity profiles through a multi-stage axial compressor
(Rolls-Royce, 1992).
Note that the IGV also adds no energy to the flow. It is designed to add swirl in the
direction of rotor motion to lower the Mach number of the flow relative to the rotor
blades, and thus improve the aerodynamic performance of the rotor.
Figure 12.6: Velocity triangles for an axial compressor stage. Primed quantities are
in the relative frame, unprimed quantities are in the absolute frame.
In drawing these velocity diagrams it is important to note that the flow typically leaves
the trailing edges of the blades at approximately the trailing edge angle in the
coordinate frame attached to the blade (i.e. relative frame for the rotor, absolute
frame for the stator).
We will now write the Euler Turbine Equation in terms of stage design parameters:
From geometry,
and
so
or
So we see that the total or stagnation temperature rise across the stage increases
with the tip Mach number squared, and for fixed positive blade angles, decreases
with increasing mass flow. This behavior is represented schematically in Figure 12.7.
The appropriate velocity triangles are shown in Figure 12.9, where again the axial
velocity was assumed to be constant for purposes of illustration. As we did for the
compressor, we can write the Euler Turbine Equation in terms of useful design
variables: