Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
No. Kegiatan
1 2 3 4 1
Identifikasi Latar Belakang &
1
Akar Masalah
Studi Literatur & Kerangka
2
Pemikiran
3 Metodologi Penelitian
4 Submit & Revisi Proposal KA
5 Desain & Penyebaran Kuisioner
Pengumpulan Data Kuisioner &
6
Profil Responden
Analisis Data Kuisioner &
7
Penulisan Bab Analisa
Penarikan Kesimpulan &
8
Penyusunan Saran
9 Finalisasi Dokumen KA
10 Sidang
11 Revisi KA
x x
x x
BOOK
x x x
x x x
x x
Journal/ Conference/ Book Rank Total Cost Time Quality
x X
x
x x
x
x
x x
x x
x
OLD PAPER x
x
x
x
x x
x x x
THESIS X X
X
Customer Acceptance Performance Scope
x
x x
x x
x x
Customer Acceptance Performance Scope
x x
x
X
Good Relation Customer Satisfaction
x x
x x
x
x
X
Project Team Satisfaction Functionality Benefit
x x
x
x
x
X
Number Title Author
2012 ICEGOV 2
2015 ICACT 0
2016 0
Change Management
Change Management Project Management
Role
X X
X
X
X
X X
The Elaboration
Likelihood Model
Project
IT Project IT Project Success
Implementation
barriers
Human Factors
User Resistance
User Resistance X
X user resistance X
User Resistance
X X
Employess Satisfaction
acceptane resistance
X TAM
X
X X
Implementation
Strategies
implementation
failure
Learning Organization
User Acceptance
IT user behavior
employee participation
Users Resistance
resistance to change
User Participation
User Resistance
Resistance to change
User Acceptance
Concept-10
12
Relasi Kotter Ke
CSF
3 7,15 3
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
1 & 11
CSF Project Succes
Ada Framework
Riset
Keikutsertaan User,
Ekspektasi Manajemen
Time
Scope
Quality
Stakeholder Acceptance
Penulis
(Holland and Light 1999; Sumner 1999; Kuang et al. 2001; Nelson and
Somers 2001; Zachary and Johnson, 2003; Guth and MacMillan, 1989;
Jones et al. 2004; Pinto and Slevin 1986; Belout and Gauvreau 2004; Heller
1998; Austin & Currie 2003; Kitchen and Daly’s article 2002; Todryk 1990;
Thornberry 1987; Rogers 1990; Graetz, 2000; Strobel, 1999; PMBOK, 2002;
Bingi 1999; Buckhout 1999; Wee; Holland et al.; Roberts and Barrar 1992;
Fui Hoon et al 2001; Morris and Hough 1987)
(McCredie and Updegrove 1999; Summer 1999; Nelson and Somers 2001;
Pinto and Slevin 1986; Belout and Gauvreau 2004)
(Wee 1999; Kuang et al. 2001; Pinto and Slevin 1986; Belout and Gauvreau
2004; Buckhout et al.1999; Bingi et al.1999; Rosario 2000; Wee 2000;
Stefanou 1999; Fui Hoon et al 2001; Morris and Hough 1987; Belassi and
Tukel 1996)
(Holland and Light 1999; Kuang et al. 2001; Jones et al. 2004; CMA 1995;
Pinto and Slevin 1986; Belout and Gauvreau 2004; Strobel, 1999; Buckhout
et al 1999; Falkowski et al; Holland et al 1999; Roberts and Barrar 1992;
Rosario;Wee 2000; Buckhout et al 1999; Fui Hoon et al 2001; Morris and
Hough 1987; )
(Holland and Light 1999; McCredie and Updegrove 1999; Kuang et al. 2001;
Nelson and Somers 2001) Rosario 2000; Holland et al. 1999 Sumner 1999;
Wee 2000; Falkowski et al 1998; Belassi and Tukel 1996; Rockart 1979)
(Holland and Light 1999; McCredie and Updegrove 1999; Kuang et al. 2001;
Nelson and Somers 2001; Fui Hoon et al 2001)
(McCredie and Updegrove 1999; CMA 1995; Jones, Agure and Calderone
2004; , Pinto and Slevin 1986; Belout and Gauvreau 2004; Bryde &
Robinson 2007; Pinto and Covin 1989; Pinti and Mantel 1990; Pinto and
Slevin 1987; Pinto and Slevin 1988; Pinto and Slevin 1989 )
(McCredie and Updegrove 1999; Somers 2001; Nelson and Somers 2001;
Falkowski et al. 1998; Sumner 1999; Fui Hoon et al 2001)
(Sumner 1999; Kuang et al. 2001; Nelson and Somers 2001; Rosario 2000;
Falkowski et al. 1998; Fui Hoon et al 2001; Morris and Hough 1987)
(Kuang et al. 2001; Nelson and Somers 2001; Bingi et al 1999; Holland et al
1999; Sumner 1999; Roberts and Barrar 1992; Rosario 2000; Fui Hoon et al
2001)
(Sumner 1999)
(Sumner 1999)
(Kuang et al. 2001; Falkowski 1998; Rosario 2000; Roberts and Barrar 1992;
Bingi et al 1999; Holland et al.1999; Sumner 1999; Wee 2000;
(Kuang et al. 2001;Pinto and Slevin 1986; Belout and Gauvreau 2004;
McCredie and Updegrove 1999; Holland et al; Rosario 2000; Sumner 1999;
Morris and Hough 1987; )
(Kuang et al. 2001; Pinto and Slevin 1986; Belout and Gauvreau 2004;Wee
2000; Holland et al 1999; Rosario 2000; Scheer and Habermann 2000;
Bryde & Robinson 2007;Morris and Hough 1987;)
(Nelson and Somers 2001)
(Nelson and Somers 2001; Pinto and Slevin 1986; Belout and Gauvreau
2004)
(Nelson and Somers 2001)
(Morris and Hough 1987; Bryde and Robinson 2007, Chan 2002; Abdullah
and Ramly 2009; Atkinson, 1999; Wateridge, 1998, Lim and Mohamed,
1999, Globerson and Zwikael, 2002, Kerzner, 2003; Morris, 2001, Chan et
al., 2002, Bryde and Brown, 2004, Jha and Iyer, 2005; Wateridge, 1998, Lim
and Mohamed, 1999, Globerson and Zwikael, 2002, Kerzner, 2003; Belassi
and Tukel 1996)
(Morris, 2001, Chan et al., 2002, Bryde and Brown, 2004, Jha and Iyer,
2005; Abdullah and Ramly 2009; Atkinson, 1999; Wateridge, 1998, Lim and
Mohamed, 1999, Globerson and Zwikael, 2002, Kerzner, 2003; Morris,
2001, Chan et al., 2002, Bryde and Brown, 2004, Jha and Iyer, 2005;
Wateridge, 1998, Lim and Mohamed, 1999, Globerson and Zwikael, 2002,
Kerzner, 2003; Belassi and Tukel (1996)
(Morris, 2001, Chan et al., 2002, Bryde and Brown, 2004, Jha and Iyer,
2005; Westerveld, 2002; Belassi and Tukel 1996)
Abdullah and Ramly 2009; Atkinson, 1999; PMBOK;
(De Wit 1988; Wateridge, 1998, Lim and
Mohamed, 1999; Globerson and Zwikael, 2002, Kerzner, 2003; Pinto and
Slevin 1989; Van Aken 1996; Wateridge 1995)
Manajemen Perubahan Relasi Kotter Fokus Criteria Customer Criteria Customer Satisfaction
Kotter Ke Bryde& Satisfaction Bryde & Bryde & Robinson (2007)
Robinson Robinson (2007)
Evaluating suppliers/subcontractors
based the agreed budget
Empower Action
Don’t Let Up
Make change stick
(tertanam sebagai budaya)
Subjective
measures
Subjective
measures
Sub CSF Chan
Time
Cost
Quality
Technical Pefomance
Satisfaction of Key
Project Participants
Time
Cost
Health & Safety
Quality
Technical Pefomance
Productivity
Satisfaction of Key
Project Participants
Profitability
Satisfaction of key
project participants, end
user and outsiders due
to:
Hipotesis Model Perubahan Kotter CSF
Bantuan dari Top Manajemen
H1 Incease Urgency
Stakeholder Acceptance
H2 Build The Guiding team Kehadiran Champion, Project Sponsor, Change Agent
H3 Get The Right Vision Business Plan, Clear Vision, Strategy to stakeholder
Bantuan dari Top Manajemen
Keikutsertaan User
H4 Communicating for Buy In
Training dan Pendidikan tentang Proyek Terkait
Memonitor dan mengevaluasi performance
Keahlian Pihak Luar
Kerjasama dan Team Proyek yang Seimbang
H5 Empower Action
Manajemen Proyek, Tim Manajemen Proyek
Training dan Pendidikan tentang Proyek Terkait
H6 Create Short Term Win Milestone (ShortTerm Wins)
H7 Don’t Let Up Bantuan dari Top Manajemen
H8 Make change stick Change Management Program and Culture
Rujukan
Stratman & Roth 2002, Fui-Hoon 2001, Berson, 2008, Puelle 2012
Stratman & Roth 2002, Fui-Hoon 2001, Berson, 2008, Yong and Mustaffa, 2013
Weisbord 1987, Fui-Hoon 2001, Caldwell, 2003, Lunenburg 2010
Roberts Barrar 1992, Falkowski et al. 1998, Buckhout et al. 1999, Fui-Hoon 2000, Banihashemi 2017, D.Ford 2012
Wee 2000, Fui-Hoon 2001, Schiuma 2012
Sumner 1999, Stefanou 1999, Fui-Hoon 2001. Fernandez-Perz et al 2014, Vakola et al 2014,
Rosariio 2000, Fui-Hoon 2001, Hadi 2014
Rosario 2000, Sumner 1999, Fui-Hoon 2001, Bakaret al., 2010, Yong and Mustaffa, 2013
Rosario 2000, Fui-Hoon 2001, Taylor 2008
Fui Hoon 2001, Farokhi and Murty 2014; Shahzad et al. 2013
Rosario 2000,Fui-Hoon 2001, Lie et al 2011, Tabish and Jha 2011, Yong and Mustaffa 2013
Sumner 1999, Fui-Hoon 2001, Ates and Bititci 2011
Holland et all 1999, Fui-Hoon 2001, Wee 2000, Calder 2013
Fui Hoon 2001, Lunenburg 2010, Vakola 2014
Ribert&Barrar 1992, Fui-Hoon 2001, Juris Iljins 2015 Lunenburg 2010, Avila 2012
Kelompok
1
2
3a
3b
4
5
6a
6b
6c
6d
7a
7b
7c
7d
8
9
10
Hipotesis
terkait jabatan responden sampai tahap implementasi proyek TI
terkait jumlah keterlibatan responden hingga tahap implementasi proyek TI
Proses Increase Urgency memiliki pengaruh positif terhadap faktor Bantuan dari Top Manajemen dalam men
Proses Increase Urgency memiliki pengaruh positif terhadap faktor Stakeholder Acceptance dalam menunjan
Proses Build The Guiding Team memiliki pengaruh positif terhadap faktor Kehadiran Champion dalam menu
Proses Get The Right Vision memiliki pengaruh positif terhadap faktor Business Plan, Vision dan Strategi dal
Proses Communicating Buy In memiliki pengaruh positif terhadap faktor Bantuan dari Top Manajemen dalam
Proses Communicating Buy In memiliki pengaruh positif terhadap faktor Keikutsertaan User dalam menunja
Proses Communicating Buy In memiliki pengaruh positif terhadap faktor Training dan Pendidikan tentang Pr
Proses Communicating Buy In memiliki pengaruh positif terhadap faktor memonitor dan mengevaluasi perfo
Proses Empower Action memiliki pengaruh positif terhadap faktor Keahlian Pihak Luar dalam menunjang e
Proses Empower Action memiliki pengaruh positif terhadap faktor Kerjasama dan Team Proyek yang Seimba
Proses Empower Action memiliki pengaruh positif terhadap faktor Manajemen Proyek dalam menunjang efek
Proses Empower Action memiliki pengaruh positif terhadap faktor Training dan Pendidikan tentang Proyek T
Proses Create Short Term Win memiliki pengaruh positif terhadap faktor Milestone (critical Path) dalam men
Proses Don't Let Up memiliki pengaruh positif terhadap faktor Bantuan dari Top Manajemen dalam menunj
Proses Make Change Stick memiliki pengaruh positif terhadap faktor Training dan Pendidikan tentang Proye
Pertanyaan terkait Hipotesis Jawa
Apakah Jabatan anda pada proyek?
Apakah anda terlibat sampai tahap implementasi proyek? (Ya / T
Skala Lik
Sangat Setuju
Jawaban
(Ya / Tidak)
Skala Likert (1-5)
Sangat Tidak
Setuju Netral Tidak Setuju Setuju