Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
www.elsevier.com/locate/ces
Received 19 January 2006; received in revised form 28 March 2006; accepted 28 March 2006
Available online 6 April 2006
Abstract
The influence of operational variables on the mean residence time (MRT) and hold-up of the solids in rotary kilns has been investigated by
many researchers. However, their reports on the influence of the feed rate on MRT, for example, are not consistent with one another. In this
study, experiments are conducted on a 400 mm ID pilot kiln with a cylindrical discharge dam. Sand is used as the testing solids. MRT and
the hold-up are measured under various feed rates and rotation speeds. Experimental results indicate that MRT increases slightly with the feed
rate, and that the gradient is smaller at high rotation speeds. The hold-up shows a near-linear increase with the mass of feed per kiln rotation.
The experimental data are then used to test equations provided by different researchers for the prediction of MRT. Comparisons show that,
results of the empirical equation from Sullivan, J.D., Maier, C.G., Ralson, O.C. [1927. Passage of solid particles through rotary cylindrical
kilns. U.S. Bureau of Mines Technical Paper No. 384.] agree well with measurements for the cases of low kiln loadings, while the numerical
model of Saeman, W.C. [1951. Passage of solids through rotary kilns: factors affecting time of passage. Chemical Engineering Progress 47,
508-514.] gives good predictions over the entire range of parameters considered.
䉷 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Transport process; Powder technology; Granular materials; Residence time; Chemical reactors; Rotary kiln
•
1. Introduction variables: feed rate m, rotation speed n and inclination angle
of the kiln; (3) property of the solids: angle of repose ; and
Rotary kilns are widely used in chemical and metallurgical (4) geometry of the dam which is installed at the discharge end
industries. A rotary kiln consists mainly of an inclined cylinder or feed end of the kiln.
that is slowly rotated around its axis by a driven motor. The For rotary kilns without a discharge dam, an equation was fist
solids are fed into the cylinder at the upper end and transported given by Sullivan et al. (1927) to calculate the mean residence
to the lower end due to the inclination and rotation of the time of the solids:
√
cylinder (Fig. 1). During the transport, the height of the solids L
bed decreases. The mean residence time (MRT) of the solids MRT = 1.77 · · . (1)
D n·
in the kiln is of importance, because during this time the solids √
exchange mass- and heat with the hot medium (for example Accordingly, MRT is proportional to and the size ratio
with the combustion gas), being dried, calcinated and cooled. L/D, but inversely proportional to the rotation speed n and the
To increase MRT, dams are usually installed at the discharge kiln inclination . The feed rate exerts no influence on the resid-
end of the kiln. ence time. According to Chatterjee et al. (1983b), however, the
Factors influencing MRT have been investigated by many feed rate definitely influences the residence time and the reside-
researchers (Sullivan et al., 1927; Saeman, 1951; Chatterjee et nce time is never a direct function of the other variables, rather
al., 1983a, b; Sai et al., 1990; Lebas et al., 1995; Spurling, 2000; ⎛ • ⎞0.981
1.054 1.1
Li et al., 2002; Descoins et al., 2005). The variables are: (1) the 0.1026 · L3 ⎝ V ⎠ L
MRT = • · · · ,
dimension of the kiln: diameter D and length L; (2) operational L ·n
3 D
V
∗ Corresponding author. Tel.: +49 391 67 12460; fax: +49 391 67 12762. (2)
•
E-mail address: Xiaoyan.liu@vst.uni-magdeburg.de (X.Y. Liu). where V is the volumetric feed rate.
0009-2509/$ - see front matter 䉷 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.ces.2006.03.054
X.Y. Liu, E. Specht / Chemical Engineering Science 61 (2006) 5176 – 5181 5177
By solving Eq. (4), the depth profile h(x) of the solids and
thus the kiln hold-up M [kg] can be calculated as
L
M = S · R 2 · (εx − sin εx · cos εx ) · dx, (7)
0
• at the steady state the rotation of the kiln and the feeder are
stopped.
1.55 and 990 kg/h. At the inlet, the solids are put into the ro- Table 1 summarizes the experimental results under various
tating cylinder and transported to the outlet where they are rotation speeds and feed rates. In the following sections, the
then collected in a container. All experiments are conducted at effect of each variable on the kiln hold-up and MRT will be
room temperature with sand as testing solids (particle diame- discussed and the predicted values of MRT by different authors
ter d = 0.366 mm, bulk density s = 1370 kg/m3 and dynamic will be compared with experimental data.
angle of repose = 33◦ ).
3.1. Kiln hold-up
2.2. Experimental procedure
As can be seen from Table 1, an increase of the feed rate
For all trials the inclination angle of the kiln is fixed at 3◦ . leads to a higher hold-up when the rotation speed is kept con-
Variables are the rotation speed (n = 1 ∼ 2.5 rpm) and the feed stant. If the rotation speed is increased and the feed rate is kept
•
rate (m =60 ∼ 150 kg/h). The values have to be confined in constant, the solids can be transported faster out of the kiln and
such ranges to ensure that the solids motion stays in the rolling thus the hold-up becomes lower. This agrees with experimental
mode, as it is in most industrial plants. Equations predicting observations reported in the literature.
the rolling motion can be found elsewhere in Liu et al. (2005). It will be interesting to know the co-effect of the feed rate
•
The following procedure is used to determine the mean res- m and the rotation speed n on the hold-up M. For this, a new
idence time of the solids in the kiln. It is similar to the method •
variable defined as m /n (mass of feed per kiln rotation) is
used by Lebas et al. (1995) and Descoins et al. (2005). introduced. It is found that M increases approximately linearly
Step 1: Identification of the steady state of the solids flow. •
with m /n (Fig. 4) with a relation of
• the rotation of the kiln and the feeder are switched on and •
set to the desired values. M = 56 · m /n − 6.2. (10)
• the mass flow rate of the solids at the outlet is determined
For comparison, calculated values of M based on Eq. (4) are
by weighting the mass of the solids that are collected in the
also represented in the figure. It can be seen that the discrep-
container with a time interval of about 10 min.
ancy between the measurements and the calculations is rela-
• the steady state of the solids flow is reached when the mass •
flow rate at the outlet remains constant and its value is equal tively small. The error becomes bigger at higher values of m /n,
•
to the feed rate. reaching its maximum of 10% at m /n = 1.6. This new variable
X.Y. Liu, E. Specht / Chemical Engineering Science 61 (2006) 5176 – 5181 5179
Table 1
A list of the experimental data and results
Rotation Feed rate Back-spillage Kiln hold-up kiln loading Experimental Calculated value of MRT (min) and errora (%) by
•
speed m (kg/h) (kg) M (kg) f (%) value of
n (rpm) MRT (min)
60.3 0 18.4 2.2 18.3 16.6 (−10%) 10.3 (−44%) 19.0 (4%) 19.3 (6%)
2.5 90.3 0 27.8 3.4 18.5 16.6 (−10%) 10.2 (−45%) 18.4 (0%) 19.2 (4%)
120.4 0 38.3 4.7 19.1 16.6 (−13%) 10.2 (−47%) 18.1 (−5%) 19.1 (0%)
149.5 0 48.6 5.9 19.5 16.6 (−15%) 10.1 (−48%) 17.8 (−9%) 19.2 (−2%)
59.9 0 30.5 3.7 30.6 27.6 (10%) 17.0 (−44%) 30.5 (0%) 31.9 (4%)
1.5 91.0 0 49.0 6.0 32.3 27.6 (15%) 16.9 (−48%) 29.6 (−8%) 32.0 (−1%)
118.7 1.8 66.3 8.1 33.5 27.6 (18%) 16.8 (−50%) 29.0 (−13%) 32.2 (−4%)
147.7 11.9 88.3 10.8 35.9 27.6 (23%) 16.7 (−53%) 28.5 (−20%) 32.5 (−10%)
1 59.8 0 50.0 6.1 50.2 41.4 (17%) 25.3 (−50%) 44.4 (−11%) 47.9 (−4%)
87.2 12.4 74.9 9.1 51.5 41.4 (20%) 25.1 (−51%) 43.2 (−16%) 48.4 (−6%)
a The error is defined as [(calculated MRT − experimental MRT)/experimental MRT] × 100%.
Fig. 4. The kiln hold-up M in dependence on the mass of feed per rotation
•
m /n. •
Fig. 5. Effect of the rotation speed n and feed rate m on the mean residence
time MRT.
•
m /n could be used later for the scale-up of hold-up in rotary
kilns (Abhouzeid and Fuerstenau, 1980). From this equation it can be seen that MRT decreases linearly
•
with n with a slope of 56, while increases linearly with m with
3.2. Mean residence time of the solids (MRT) a much lower slope of 6.2. Consequently, the influence of the
feed rate on the mean residence time is less striking than that
In Fig. 5 MRT is represented in dependence of the rotation of the rotation speed.
speed for different feed rates. It is apparent that the rotation
•
speed n exerts more influence on MRT than the feed rate m. 4. Prediction of MRT
As n is increased 2.5 times (from 1 to 2.5 rpm), MRT drops
rapidly by 64% from 50 to 18 min. In contrast, MRT shows As discussed in the first section, several equations are avail-
•
only a slight increase with m. For example, at n = 2.5 rpm the able to predict the mean residence time. For comparisons, the
•
deviation of MRTs is less than 7% when m varies between 60 calculated values based on Eqs. (1)–(4) and the corresponding
and 150 kg/h. This can be explained by combing Eqs. (9) and errors are given in Table 1 and compared to the measured val-
(10) which gives ues in Fig. 6.
The calculated values using Eq. (1) are lower than the mea-
•
MRT = 56/n − 6.2/ m . (11) surements. This is because Eq. (1) is limited for rotary kilns
5180 X.Y. Liu, E. Specht / Chemical Engineering Science 61 (2006) 5176 – 5181
(1) The kiln hold-up increases nearly linearly with the mass
•
of feed per kiln rotation m /n.
(2) The rotation speed exerted a more pronounced effect on
MRT than the feed rate. A rapid increase of MRT can be
achieved by decreasing the rotation speed.
(3) With an increasing feed rate, MRT shows a slight increase,
and the gradient is negligibly small at high rotation speeds.
5. Conclusions References
The mean residence time (MRT) of solids and the kiln hold- Abhouzeid, A.Z.M., Fuerstenau, D.W., 1980. Scale-up of particulate hold-up
up are influenced by a number of factors, such as kiln geometry, in rotary drums. Powder Technology 25, 65–70.
X.Y. Liu, E. Specht / Chemical Engineering Science 61 (2006) 5176 – 5181 5181
Chatterjee, A., Sathe, A.V., Srivastava, M.P., Mukhopadhyay, P.K., 1983a. Liu, X.Y., Specht, E., Mellmann, J., 2005. Slumping-rolling transition
Flow of materials in rotary kilns used for sponge iron manufacture: part of granular solids in rotary kilns. Chemical Engineering Science 60,
I. effect of some operational variables. Metallurgical Transaction B 14B, 3629–3636.
375–381. Saeman, W.C., 1951. Passage of solids through rotary kilns: factors affecting
Chatterjee, A., Sathe, A.V., Mukhopadhyay, P.K., 1983b. Flow of materials time of passage. Chemical Engineering Progress 47, 508–514.
in rotary kilns used for sponge iron manufacture: part II. effect of kiln Sai, P.S.T., Surender, G.D., Damodaran, A.D., Suresh, V., Philip, Z.G.,
geometry. Metallurgical Transaction B 14B, 383–392. Sankaran, K., 1990. Residence time distribution and material flow studies
Descoins, N., Dirion, J.-L., Howes, T., 2005. Solid transport in a pyrolysis in a rotary kiln. Metallurgical Transaction B 21B, 1005–1011.
pilot-scale rotary kiln: preliminary results–stationary and dynamic results. Spurling, R.J., 2000. Granular flow in an inclined rotating cylinder: steady
Chemical Engineering and Processing 44, 315–321. state and transients. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Chemical Engineering,
Lebas, E., Houzelot, J.L., Ablitzer, D., Hanrot, F., 1995. Experimental study University of Cambridge.
of residence time, particle movement and bed depth profile in rotary kilns. Sullivan, J.D., Maier, C.G., Ralson, O.C., 1927. Passage of solid particles
Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 73, 173–180. through rotary cylindrical kilns. U.S. Bureau of Mines Technical Paper,
Li, S.-Q., Yan, J.-H., Li, R.-D., Chi, Y., Cen, K.-F., 2002. Axial transport No. 384.
and residence time of MSW in rotary kilns: part I. experimental. Powder
Technology 126, 217–227.