Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 1

Document Code :CME-F-Ac

Manuel S. Enverga University Foundation Document Title:Activity form


Lucena City, Philippines Page No.:1of 1
ISO 9001:2008 Certificate PH13/0889 Revision No.: 1
Accredited Level II by PACUCOA EffectivityDate:November 2014
COLLEGE OF MARITIME EDUCATION Prepared by:Instructor
QUALITY FORM Reviewed by:Assessor/Department Chair
Approved by: Dean

ACTIVITY FORM

COURSE TITLE: AUTO1102


Table A-III/1 and Table A-III/2 Function: Marine Engineering operational level
Electrical, electronic and control engineering at the management level
STCW CODE/FUNCTION:
Maintenance and repair at the operational level
STCW’78 as amended
Competence:
Operate main and auxiliary machinery and associated control systems
Knowledge, Understanding
Automatic control systems
And Proficiency
Aims/Objectives/Target The students must be able to demonstrate the operation principles of each
learning outcomes: component constructing automatic control systems
Activity Title : Low level alarm
Name/Group :
Date:
Briefing Coverage:
Safety Precaution
Familiarization to the specification and function of the equipment/machineries.
Briefly discuss the objectives and procedure of the activity.

ACTIVITY PROCEDURES
Remarks
Performance Criteria/Procedures Weighted Points
C NYC
1 Close drain valve to sludge tank /30

2 Open fill up valve of GE sump tank. /30

3 Reset Low level alarm. /40

Total:
/100
Note: On the remarks column check letter C if the student is COMPETENT to do the performance
criteria/procedures and check lettersNYC if the student is NOT YET COMPETENT to do the procedure.

Reassessment:
After the instructor/professor has completed assessing all students in the subject matter, the student marked
NYC will be reassessedto meet the standard of competence required in the activity.
Failure to pass the reassessment requires student to reenroll the subject course.
Failure to take the reassessment on the announced schedule forfeits the student’s chance.
Debriefing:
Remarks ________________________________________________________________________________
Result of activity _______________________________________________________________________________
Recommendation ________________________________________________________________________________

Level of Competency:
Grading System Guide Excellent---------------------90 to100%
Very Good--------------------80 to 89%
𝒏𝒖𝒎𝒃𝒆𝒓 𝒐𝒇 𝒄𝒐𝒎𝒑𝒆𝒕𝒆𝒏𝒕 𝒘𝒆𝒊𝒈𝒕𝒉 𝒑𝒐𝒊𝒏𝒕 𝒆𝒒𝒖𝒊𝒗𝒂𝒍𝒆𝒏𝒕 Good ---------------------------70 to 79%
𝒙 𝟏𝟎𝟎 = %
𝒕𝒐𝒕𝒂𝒍 𝒏𝒖𝒎𝒃𝒆𝒓 𝒐𝒇 𝒘𝒆𝒊𝒈𝒕𝒉 𝒑𝒐𝒊𝒏𝒕 Satisfactory------------------60 to 69%
Pass----------------------------50 to 59%
Fail-----------------------------00 to 49%
3AE MARLON V. MANALO 2AE EMMANUEL SERRANO CAPT. JULIO JOE VIRTUCIO

Prepared by: Calibrated Approved by:


(Instructor/ Assessor) by:(Assessor/Department Chair) (Dean, CME)