Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
function with the strategic objectives of the organization. In, order to achieve
organization goal. The next section explores how human resource management has
been modified to reflect the step changes in markets and production requirements over
time. We will describe the nature of the changes to major business eras, leading to an
After explaining what is meant by strategy, the third section develops key strategic
issues in human resource development. We will also investigate how human resources
can play a profoundly important part in developing and implementing strategy within an
in greater depth. This section explains the critical differences between many Western
firms’ and Japanese approaches to human resource development. We will show that
resource issues, including industrial relations, and describe how human resources can
should be a key task of organization. If people were to speak to senior – level managers
within firms they would, typically, identify how important their staff are. However, these
same senior –level managers will often concentrate on slashing budgets related to
human resources development. They may also have no qualms about downsizing the
number of employees at the same time. What is sometimes not clear, though, is that
competitive environment which firms now face, human capital has become a precious
Human Resource Development is a vital area for firms because ideas for innovation,
quality and continuous improvement, as well as other critically important inputs needed
to compete in the modern, highly competitive business world, come from people and not
from machines. The extent to which people will provide suggestions for improvements in
all forms will depend, to a large extent, on human resource development strategies
within firms. The need to develop human resources on an ongoing basis has not always
been so prominent.
understand the strategic importance of human resource development. Many firms are
too quick to downsize or ‘right size’ in the pursuit of cost-cutting initiatives. Other
strategic decisions, including mergers and acquisitions, may threaten the culture that
generate strategic capability by ensuring that the organization has the skilled, engaged
according with the resources – based view as described Boxall theory, the strategic
goal will be to create firms which are more intelligent and flexible than their competitors
by hiring and implementing more talented employee and by improving their skills base
purpose is to ensure that Human resource management is fully integrated with the
strategy and strategic needs of the firm. Human resource policies cohere both across
policy areas and across hierarchies and human resources practices are adjusted,
accepted and used by line managers and employees as part of their everyday work.
to address the issue of the extent to which HR strategy should take into account ethical
considerations the interests of all the stakeholders in the organization and employees
To a large extent, the philosophy of strategic HRM is based on the resource based view.
This states that it is the range of resources in an organization, including its human
resources, that produces its unique character and creates competitive advantage .The
resource based view as developed and expanded provides a durable basis for strategy
and builds on and provides a unifying framework for the field of strategic human
resource management.
That competitive advantage arises first when firms within an industry are heterogeneous
with respect to the strategic resources they control and, second, when these resources
are not perfectly mobile across firms and thus heterogeneity can be long-lasting.
and capabilities that a firm brings to competition in its environment. These resources
include all the experience, knowledge, judgment, risk-taking propensity and wisdom of
For a firm resource to have the potential for creating sustained competitive advantage it
should have four attributes: it must be valuable, rare, imperfectly imitable and
substitutable. To discover these resources and capabilities, managers must look inside
their firm for valuable, rare and costly-to imitate resources, and then exploit these
Strategic fit refers to the two dimensions that distinguish strategic Human Resource
Strategic flexibility
Strategic flexibility is defined as the ability of the firm to respond and adapt to changes
Stable, predictable environment the strategy could be to develop people with a narrow
range of skills or not to develop multi skilled people and to elicit a narrow range of
organizations might develop organic Human Resource systems that produce a human
capital pool with people possessing a wide range of skills who can engage in a wide
bearing in mind the increased amount of discretionary behavior that may be appropriate
in different roles.
It can be argued that the concepts of strategic flexibility and fit are incompatible, ‘fit’
implies a fixed relationship between the Human Resource strategy and business
strategy, but the latter has got to be flexible, so how can good fit be maintained, But that
the concepts of fit and flexibility are complementary fit exists at a point in time, while
organization goal.
Modern developed economies are increasingly relying on human capital to gain their
employees rather than just the abilities inherent in technology and machinery that are
crucial. The capacity of an organization to manage its talent is what will set it apart from
other competitors. Our people are our most valuable resources and the key to the
development of a knowledge based economy. Only by developing our own local human
resources and providing opportunities for continuing education for people of all walks of
life can we prepare ourselves for the changes in the marketplace. This is of most
importance to the well-being of our people and the long-term development. However,
talented people are scarce; as a result companies must pay closer attention to the issue
periodic forward scanning, analysis based on longer time frame, communication about
goals and resource allocation, framework for short-term plan evaluation and integration,
institutionalizing longer term time horizons necessary for investments, and decisional
criteria for short-term decision making. It is impossible to address these critical issues
without bringing in the human resources factor at each element of the process.
In the early development of strategic management, there was little concern about the
human resources function until the actual implementation began. Rarely was the human
resource brought into the planning process. Now this is changing. Strategy and human
resource planning are integrated early in the process. There are several benefits of
integrating human resource planning with strategic planning, making it imperative for
this integration to be regularly pursued. Some experts have suggested that the human
Because of the importance of strategy in the success of firms and the critical ingredient
of human resources in the strategic plan, human resource managers are finding
related to the organizational goals, the ultimate opportunity to show the contribution of
The strategic importance of human resources has been widely recognized. As a result,
has been linked to increased productivity, good customer service, improved efficiency,
increased firm value, greater profitability or financial returns and overall organizational
survival.
performance relative to that of competitors. In this respect, the main focus of SHRM is
on integrated combinations of HRM practices, through which organizations should
create competitive advantage rather than simply adapting to the existing context. A
review of the literature reveals five interrelated approaches to the link between the
relationships between a firm’s internal resources, its profitability and the ability to stay
considered as an internal strength only if it meets the five criteria for sustainable
replicate, have no close substitutes, be rare and create value. The central idea of the
resource-based theory is that a firm’s systems, among its other attributes, enable the
Another approach focuses on the way human resource systems support competitive
advantage and organizational learning through people. This perspective implies that
understand this integration researchers have used notions of internal or horizontal fit
and external or vertical fit. Management must have a clear understanding of internal fit
and the way such fit facilitates organizational learning and adaptation. Furthermore,
practices with external fit create capabilities that maintain the organization’s overall
competitive advantage