Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 17

An Introduction to Graphene Electronic Structure

Michael S. Fuhrer
Department of Physics and
Center for Nanophysics and Advanced Materials
University of Maryland

Michael S. Fuhrer University of Maryland


If you re-use any material in this
presentation, please credit:
Michael S. Fuhrer, University of
Maryland

Michael S. Fuhrer University of Maryland


Carbon and Graphene

Carbon Graphene

- Hexagonal lattice;
- C 1 pz orbital at each site
-
-
4 valence electrons

1 pz orbital

3 sp2 orbitals

Michael S. Fuhrer University of Maryland


Graphene Unit Cell
Two identical atoms in unit cell:
A B

Two representations of unit cell:

Two atoms

1/3 each of 6 atoms = 2 atoms

Michael S. Fuhrer University of Maryland


Band Structure of Graphene
Tight-binding model: P. R. Wallace, (1947)
(nearest neighbor overlap = γ0)

 3k x a   k y a  2 y 
k a
E (k )  EF   0 1  4 cos  cos
    4 cos  
 2   2   2 
E

kx

ky

Michael S. Fuhrer University of Maryland


Band Structure of Graphene – Γ point (k = 0)
Bloch states:
1
“anti-bonding”
FA(r), or   E = +γ0
0
1 1
 
2  1
A
B

Γ point:
k=0
0
FB(r), or  
1

“bonding”
A
B E = -γ0
1 1
 
2 1

Michael S. Fuhrer University of Maryland


Band Structure of Graphene – K point
4 3a
K
K  
3a 2

1 0
FA(r), or   FB(r), or  
0 1
K

K
Phase:

1
2
i
3
e
4
i
3
e

K
Michael S. Fuhrer λ University of Maryland
Bonding is Frustrated at K point

“anti-bonding”
K
1 1
 
2  1
4 3a E = 0!
K  
3a 2
1
FA(r), or  
0 “bonding”
1 1
 
2 1
E = 0!
0
FB(r), or  
1 0
π/3 K point:
5π/3
Bonding and anti-bonding
4π/3 2π/3 are degenerate!
π
Michael S. Fuhrer University of Maryland
Band Structure of Graphene: k·p approximation
Hamiltonian:
 0 k x  ik y  FA (r )   FA (r ) 
vF  
     
 k x  ik y 0  FB (r )   FB (r )  K

vF (σ  k )F (r )  F (r ) K’

Eigenvectors: Energy:

 i k / 2

1 ik r  ibe 
k  e  i k / 2

;   bv F k
2  e  linear dispersion relation
θk is angle k makes with y-axis “massless” electrons
b = 1 for electrons, -1 for holes

electron has “pseudospin”


pointsS.parallel
Michael Fuhrer (anti-parallel) to momentum University of Maryland
Visualizing the Pseudospin
0
5π/3 π/3

4π/3 2π/3
π

Michael S. Fuhrer University of Maryland


Visualizing the Pseudospin
0
5π/3 π/3

4π/3 2π/3
π
30 degrees

390 degrees

Michael S. Fuhrer University of Maryland


Pseudospin

σ || k  0 k x  ik y 
 
H K  vF   k  vF  
σ || -k  k x  ik y 0 
K t 
H K '  vF   k
K’

• Hamiltonian corresponds to spin-1/2 “pseudospin”


Parallel to momentum (K) or anti-parallel to momentum (K’)

• Orbits in k-space have Berry’s phase of π

Michael S. Fuhrer University of Maryland


Pseudospin: Absence of Backscattering

K’: k||-x K: k||-x K: k||x


bonding anti-bonding bonding
orbitals orbitals orbitals
real-space
wavefunctions
(color denotes
phase)

anti-bonding

k-space
representation

K’ bonding K
Michael S. Fuhrer University of Maryland
“Pseudospin”: Berry’s Phase in IQHE

30
B=8T 26
22
T = 2.3 K 18
14
10 10

xx (e /h)

xy (e /h)
6

2
2
-2

2
-6
5 -10
π Berry’s phase for electron orbits -14
results in ½-integer quantized Hall -18
-22
effect -26
0 -30
-80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80
e2  1
 xy     4 n   Vg (V)
h  2

g s gv  2  2  4 Berry’s phase = π

Michael S. Fuhrer University of Maryland


Graphene:
SingleSingle
Layer layer vs. Bilayer
vs. Bilayer

Single layer Graphene Bilayer Graphene


w  6.0 m w  5.2 m
l  2.6 m l  4.3 m
Michael S. Fuhrer University of Maryland
Graphene Dispersion Relation: Bilayer Dispersion Relation:
“Light-like” “Massive”

E E

ky ky

kx kx
 2k 2
Massive particles: E 
Light: E    ck 2me
Electrons in graphene: Electrons in bilayer graphene:

E  vF k  2k 2
E
2m *
Fermi velocity vF instead of c Effective mass m* instead of me
vF = 1x106 m/s ~ c/300 m* = 0.033me
Michael S. Fuhrer University of Maryland
Quantum HallQuantum
Effect: Single Layer vs. Bilayer
Hall Effect
Single layer: Bilayer:
e2  1 e2
 xy     4 n    xy    4n  1
h  2 h

Berry’s phase = π Berry’s phase = 2π

QHE single layer at T=1.34K B=9T


bilayer QHE at T=1.35K, B=9T
0.25
10 0.30 8
0.20
6 0.25
4

xy(e2/h)
0.15 0.20

xy(e /h)
xx(k )
2
xx(k )

-1
-1

0
0.15

2
0.10 -2

0.10 -4
-6
0.05
0.05
-10 -8
0.00 0.00
-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30
Vg-VDirac(V) Vg-VDirac(V)
See also: Zhang et al, 2005, Novoselov et al, 2005.
Michael S. Fuhrer University of Maryland

Вам также может понравиться