Published on GJH (http://www.ghadar.

in/gjh_html)

Home > Why are South Indians good at Math?

Why are South Indians good at Math?

By GJHAdmin
Created 01/30/2011 - 08:51
Submitted by GJHAdmin on Sun, 01/30/2011 - 08:51

Ramanujam, one of the greatest mathematical brains of ancient India, hailed from Tamil Nadu. The senior
research faculty in the mathematical statistics department of the Indian Statistical Institute, an institution
with high international reputation, has for many decades been dominated by Raos from Andhra Pradesh.

The IA&AS, which stands for the Indian Audit & Accounts Service, is so highly populated by Tamilian
Brahmins that it is jocularly referred to as the Indian Ayyar & Ayyengar Service. These observations are
part of the phenomena that lead one to think that South Indians are good at mathematics. But why are
South Indians good at math?
In the book called Outliers, Malcolm Gladwell points to two ?cultural legacy? factors in explaining why
Asians are better than Americans and Europeans at math. These are: (i) the culture of rice cultivation; and
(ii) the system of naming numbers up to 99. The arguments he makes, explained below, are applicable to
South Indians as well.

Rice cultivation is a very labour intensive process. First the saplings have to be produced, then
transplanted by hand in neat rows, at ?xed distance between one another. Then almost on a daily basis,
shoots of unwanted weeds need to be detected and removed by hand. The water level needs to be
monitored and regulated for optimum yield. The argument is that a cultural legacy of intense, hard and
persistent work develops the aptitude required for mastering mathematics. It builds a people who persist in
their efforts to solve a problem, an essential quality for excelling in math.

The second argument is that the way single digit and double digit numbers are named in one?s language
matters. In the Chinese language, for instance, the name for eleven is ten-one, twelve is ten-two, and
similarly, the word for twenty nine is like two-ten-nine. In contrast, the names in the English language follow
a highly irregular pattern, especially in the teens. Eleven does not sound like ten-one at all, while sixteen
sounds only a bit like ten-six, but in reverse order. After 20, the order switches from reverse to straight, so
that 22 is twenty-two (20 + 2).

Why does this matter? It matters because a Chinese child who is asked to add sixteen and twenty-two, for
instance, would automatically think of 10+6 plus 20+2, and be able to arrive at 30+8 in his or her mind.
Hearing the English words sixteen and twenty-two does not produce the same effect; to many kids it would
be confusing. It would compel learning by rote, rather than understanding.

A child who is confused by numbers, and the simplest operations involving them like addition and
subtraction, develops a fear of math. He or she does not persist in trying to solve a problem, but gives up
half way. A vicious cycle sets in. Such a person waits to be old enough to be ?liberated from mathematics
forever?.

The number-naming system in the Tamil language is similar to the Chinese language in its regularity.
Sixteen is called pathinaaru, which is pathu (10) + aaru (6). The same regular pattern is followed for the
teens, the 20s, the 30s and so on. In Hindi and Bengali, on the other hand, the naming of the teens is
irregular. The word for 16 in Hindi is sola, which has no similarity with dus (10) or with chhe (6). There is
also an irregularity for 29, 39 and so on; the word for 29 is untees or one-less-thirty, and 39 is similarly
called one-less-forty. In Bengali there are additional irregularities; for instance, the word for 20 is kudi,
which sounds nothing like dui, the word for 2.
While Bengalis are also rice cultivators, they are disadvantaged by their number-naming system.
Tamilians, and most South Indians, on the other hand, enjoy the advantage of both the above-mentioned
factors being favourable: they have the legacy of rice cultivation plus the advantage of an intuitively
harmonious number-naming system.

What is interesting about these observations and arguments is that they point to the importance of our
legacy, as a people, and as a union of diverse peoples. Probing such questions serves to appreciate the
strengths and weaknesses of each constituent of the union. It helps to achieve a higher degree of self-
realisation, as a people. It helps to understand better why we are the way we are. It shows the potential for
what we could be, if only we could end the colonial legacy of manipulating weaknesses so as to divide and
rule. It is not enough to repeat the words unity in diversity, like a mantra. We need a system that builds on
the strengths of our diverse cultural legacy for the bene?t of all.

By S. Udayan
Perspective[1]Mathematics[2]Issue1[3]2011[4]January 2011[5]March 2011[6]Volume 5[7]
Perspective Mathematics Issue1 2011 January 2011 March 2011 Volume 5

Copyright © 2007-2016, Lok Aawaz Publishers and Distributors

Disclaimer : The opinions and views presented on this website are those of readers from around the world
and do not necessarily represent the views of GJH, its members or any affiliated organisations.

Source URL: http://www.ghadar.in/gjh_html/?q=content/why-are-south-indians-good-math

Links:
[1] http://www.ghadar.in/gjh_html/?q=category/sections/perspective
[2] http://www.ghadar.in/gjh_html/?q=taxonomy/term/19
[3] http://www.ghadar.in/gjh_html/?q=taxonomy/term/12
[4] http://www.ghadar.in/gjh_html/?q=category/year/2011
[5] http://www.ghadar.in/gjh_html/?q=category/month-year/january-2011
[6] http://www.ghadar.in/gjh_html/?q=category/month-year/march-2011
[7] http://www.ghadar.in/gjh_html/?q=category/volume-no/volume-5