See

discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at:

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/248353648

Briquetting of palm fibre and shell from

the processing of palm nuts to palm oil

Article in Biomass and Bioenergy · June 2002

DOI: 10.1016/S0961-9534(02)00022-3

CITATIONS READS

90 815

3 authors, including:

M.Z. Abdullah
Universiti Sains Malaysia
252 PUBLICATIONS 1,782 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Porous medium combustion with cogeneration system View project

Effect of nano particle size on particle distribution in SAC305 solder paste during reflow
process View project

All content following this page was uploaded by M.Z. Abdullah on 09 January 2015.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. All in-text references underlined in blue are added to the original document
and are linked to publications on ResearchGate, letting you access and read them immediately.
 Biomass and Bioenergy 22 (2002) 505 – 509

Briquetting of palm bre and shell from the processing

of palm nuts to palm oil
Z. Husain ∗ , Z. Zainac, Z. Abdullah
School of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 14300 Nibong Tebal, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia

Received 6 August 2001; received in revised form 10 January 2002; accepted 10 January 2002

Abstract

Malaysia is the major producer of palm oil in the world. It produces 8.5 million tonnes per year (8:5 × 106 t y−1 ) of palm
oil from 38:6 × 106 t y−1 of fresh fruit bunches. Palm oil production generates large amounts of process residues such as bre
(5:4 × 106 t y−1 ), shell (2:3 × 106 t y−1 ), and empty fruit bunches (8:8 × 106 t y−1 ). A large fraction of the bre and much of
the shell are used as fuel to generate process steam and electricity in the palm processing mill itself. However, much is wasted
by pile burning in the open air with attendant air pollution, dumped in areas adjacent to the mill, or utilized as manure in
the palm oil plantation. In this paper, an attempt has been made to convert these residues into solid fuel. The palm shell and
bre is densied into briquettes of diameter 40, 50 and 60 mm under moderate pressure of 5 –13:5 MPa in a hydraulic press.
Experiments are carried out to determine density, durability, impact and compressive strength of the briquettes. The heating
value, burning characteristics, ash and moisture content are other objects of the study. A relationship between press pressure
and the briquette density has been established. The produced briquettes have densities between 1100 and 1200 kg m−3 . The
briquettes properties are quite good with good resistance to mechanical disintegration, and will withstand wetting. The gross
caloric value is about 16:4 MJ kg−1 (maf), and the ash content is about 6% and the equilibrium moisture content is about
12%. Further work is required to acquire complete understanding of the densication process before good quality and durable
briquettes could be made free from cracks. ? 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords: Briquettes; Palm oil residues; Palm shell; Palm bre; Densication; Mechanical properties

1. Introduction
Malaysia grows signicant quantities of rice, sugar
cane, palm, coconut and rubber. Palm oil mills produce
crude palm oil and palm kernels as their main prod-
ucts. It also produces signicant quantities of residues
such as bre (from the masocap), shell (from around
the kernel) and empty fruit bunches (EFB). Fibre
∗ Corresponding author. Tel.: +60-04-593-7788; fax: +60-04-
594-1025.
and shell are the main thermal energy sources from the
palm oil mills. In 1992 bre and shell generated about
650 GW h to meet the electrical energy demand of
265 palm oil mills through combined heat and power
production. This amounted to 2–3% of the electrical
production of the country. The biowaste readily avail-
able from the palm oil industry is renewable energy
resource. In general, the fresh fruit bunch contains
(by weight) about 21% palm oil, 6 –7% palm kernel,
14 –15% bre, 6 –7% shell and 23% FFB. One
method of upgrading loose residue material to improve
their handling and or combustion properties is by

0961-9534/02/$ - see front matter ? 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
PII: S 0 9 6 1 - 9 5 3 4 ( 0 2 ) 0 0 0 2 2 - 3
506 Z. Husain et al. / Biomass and Bioenergy 22 (2002) 505 – 509

densication into pellets or briquettes of higher den-

sity than original bulk density of the material. It has
been noted that, there is marked improvement in com-
bustion characteristics of densied biomass residue
(DBR) compared to loose biowaste. DBR’s have been
reported to have superior and comparable combustion
characteristics to wood-based fuels [1,2]. The proper-
ties of importance for any biofuels are its physical and
chemical properties which include density, moisture
content, heating value, ash content, etc. Also impor-
tant are its mechanical properties such as impact, com-
pressive strength, as well as handling and storage [3]. Fig. 1. Three diKerent sizes of the briquettes.

2. Methodology water around 50% of the residue. The samples tested

under three diKerent conditions at room temperature
◦
2.1. Raw material procurement for 6 hours, dried in oven at 60 C for 6 hours, and
at ambient condition under the sun for 8 hours before
The bre and shell residues are collected from a putting in press. The relative humidity is 85% at room
◦
nearby palm oil mill in the ratio of 60:40 which is temperature of 32 C.
the usual practice in mills to re the boilers fresh,
and their—as received state. The proximate analysis 2.2. Briquetting process
of solid oil palm residues are as follows:
The moulds are made in diKerent ratios on weight
Fibre Shell EFB basis to obtain an optimum mix. Die moulds then sub-
Volatile matter (wt%) 72.8 76.3 75.7 jected to high pressure in a press. The cylindrical bri-
Fixed carbon (wt%) 18.8 20.5 17 quettes were made of diameters 40, 50 and 60 mm
Ash (wt%) 8.4 3.2 7.3 as shown in Fig. 1. The pressure applied is from 5 –
13:5 MPa against a back-up piston. The diameter to
The ultimate analysis of solid residues are as length ratio of briquettes was kept constant at 0.75.
follows: The optimum die charges were generally proportional
to the cross-sectional area and ranged from 113 g for
Component (wt%) Fibre Shell EFB 40 mm die to 380 g for 60 mm.
Hydrogen 6 6.3 6.3
Carbon 47.2 52.4 48.8 3. Results and discussion
Sulphur 0.3 0.2 0.2
Nitrogen 1.4 0.6 0.7 3.1. Pressure–density relationships
Oxygen 36.7 37.3 36.7
Ash 8.4 3.2 2.3 The relationship between pressure and density has
been studied by many research workers. Wheeler [4]
The residues are dried and ground to powder in a proposed a relationship between pressure and density
milling machine to approximately 60 –75 m. The - for straw in the form of a simple power-law at high
bre and shell as raw materials in powder form are then densities. Ooi Chin [5] have worked on pellets and
mixed with water and starch as binders to make bri- found a diKerent exponential relationship between die
quettes. The mixing is done in a mixer until it reached pressure and density of the form
required condition to make moulds. Starch is 10% of
the weight of the residue (bre and shell) and hot D = a‘nP + b; (1)
 Z. Husain et al. / Biomass and Bioenergy 22 (2002) 505 – 509 507

14
13
12
11
Pressure (MPa)

10
9 40mm mold diameter
8 50mm diameter
60mm diameter
7
Linear (40mm mold diameter)
6 Linear (60mm diameter)
5 Linear (50mm diameter)
4
1100 1120 1140 1160 1180 1200 1220 1240 1260 1280 1300
Density ( kg/m3)

Fig. 2. Pressure versus relaxed density for three diKerent sizes of the briquettes.

where a; b are empirical constants which vary for dif-
ferent types of feed stocks viz saw dust, rice, husk,
coconut bre, etc. Osobor [6] and Faborode [7] have
also proposed relationships between pressure and den-
sity. In the present analysis, after the briquette is re-
moved from the die after 1 week drying at room tem-
perature, the measured length was used to calculate
the relaxed density of the briquette. Fig. 2 shows the
graph between relax density and die pressure for the
three sizes of the mould diameter. There is an expo-
nential increase in pressure with increase in relax den-
sity. The relationship is in the form
P = aebD ;
where P is measured in MPa, D is the relax density
expressed in kg m−3 and a; b are empirical constants.
The value of these constants for densied biomass
residue (DBR) are as follows:
40 mm diameter; a = 0:0389; b = 0:0045;
50 mm diameter; a = 0:0871; b = 0:0036;
60 mm diameter; a = 0:189; b = 0:0033:
The density ratio (relaxed density=initial density) for
DBR is 0.65.
3.2. Speci1c energy
The specic energy required to form briquettes is
of critical importance for the design of practical ma-
chines. Wheeler [4] has obtained for barly straw values
in the range of 5 –25 MJ t −1 . Taha [8] quotes a value
of specic energy 7:2 MJ t−1 for compression of cot-
ton stalks in circular dies. In our study DBR in circu-
lar dies gives value of specic energy in the range of
5 –10 MJ t−1 depending on biomass residue density.
3.3. Heating value of DBR
The heating value of DPR was measured by Bomb
Calorimeter. The higher caloric value of DBR ob-
tained by experiment is 16:38 MJ kg−1 (maf).
(2)
3.4. Compressive strength
The briquettes were subjected to vertical force in a
compressive testing machine as shown in Fig. 3. The
failure load is read directly on the dial in kilonew-
tons. The average compressive strength for DPR is
2:56 kN m−2 .
3.5. Moisture content
The strength and durability of briquette is aKected
by moisture content, density and humidity. The re-
laxed density is measured at atmospheric conditions
with relative humidity 85% and the moisture content
measured as 12.5%.
508 Z. Husain et al. / Biomass and Bioenergy 22 (2002) 505 – 509

Fig. 3. Briquette failure under compressive force.

Table 1
Burning rate, air–fuel ratio and ash content of DBR and coal

Specimen Mass Burning Consumption Mass Mow rate Burning rate A=F ratio % ash
(g) time (min) (kg s−1 ) of air (kg s−1 ) in (W)
DPR 91.7 50 3:05 × 10−5 3:1 × 10−4 500 10.2 5.8
Coal 136 109 2:08 × 10−5 3:1 × 10−4 683 14.9 6.8

3.6. Combustion characteristics 3.7. Crack analysis

The combustion process of DBR was studied using
a locally made stove. Air for combustion is supplied
under pressure from air compressor through three per-
forated pipes with four holes in each pipe. The DPR
briquettes were placed over the hearth of the stove. The
arrangement is typical of a coal-red boiler. The mass
•
Mow rate of air is calculated as: ma = velocity of air ×
cross-sectional area of holes × no: of holes.
The velocity of air is measured by an anemome-
ter. The Mow rate of air is controlled by a valve. With
known quantity of DBR and time for complete com-
•
bustion of the biomass, its consumption (mb ) and burn-
ing rate are calculated. From the experimental results
the burning rate is 500 W, air–fuel ratio is 10.2 and
ash content is 5.8% (Table 1).
The crack analysis is made after keeping the bri-
quettes for 4 days at atmosphere conditions. The
cracks fall into two categories: surface (S) and deep
(D) cracks. The crack length is measured in the axial
direction (x) and the depth of the crack in the radial
direction (r). Table 2 shows the crack analysis for
diKerent specimen diameters.
The crack length in the axial direction increases
with diameter of briquettes. The briquettes withstood
the impact when allowed to fall freely from a height
of 1–2 m. Also the briquettes when immersed in
water for a period of 30 –360 s do not show signs
of disintegration which indicate that they do not re-
quire shielding from driving rain during transport and
storage.
 Z. Husain et al. / Biomass and Bioenergy 22 (2002) 505 – 509 509

Table 2
Crack analysis for densied biomass residue (DBR)

d = 40 mm d = 50 mm d = 60 mm
Specimen x (mm) r (mm) Category x (mm) r (mm) Category x (mm) r (mm) Category
1 51.2 10.8 D 63.2 9.8 S 76.9 28.6 S
22.3 S 28.7 S
2 52.3 7.1 S 64.2 6.7 S 77.7 13.9 D
28.5 S 43.2 S 57.6 S
3 54.7 6.9 D 65.2 9.9 D 78.9 11.2 D
17.2 S 27.2 S 34.6 S
4 56.9 11.2 D 65.5 11.2 D 80.9 11.4 S
39.6 S 11.8 S 46.7 S
5 59.6 7.2 D 67 9.8 S 80.9 11.4 S
32.7 S 46.7 S

References
[1] Bhattacharya SC, Shrestha RM. Biotechnology and
economics, RFRIC Asian Institute of Technology (AIT),
Bangkok, 1990, ISBN 974-888201-441.
[2] Bhattacharya SC, Shrestha RM. A survey of uncarbonised
briquettes and bicoal markets in Thailand. RERIC
International Journal 1989;11:17–27.
[3] Carre J, Huber J, Lacrose J. Critical analysis of dry process
improvement of materials for energy producing purposes.
Final report ADE=958=83-BDF=1, center de Recherche
Agronomique.
[4] O’Dogherty HJ, Wheeler JA. Compression of straw to high
densities in close cylindrical dies. Journal of Agricultural
Engineering 1984;29:61–71.
[5] Ooi CC, Bari S, Siddiqui KM. Densication and properties
of briquetted wastes. Renewable Energy 1998;16:1981–4.
[6] Osobov VL. Reaction to the pressing of brous plant
materials. vestik selskokozaisistrennoi Nauki 1968;13:
115–9.
[7] Faborode MO, O’Callagham JR. Theoretical analysis of
compression of brous agricultural materials. Journal
Agricultural Engineering 1986;35:175–9.
[8] Abd Elrahim YM, Huzayin AS, Taha IS. Dimensional
analysis and wafering cotton stalks. Transaction of the
American Society of Agricultural Engineers 1981;24:
829–32.

View publication stats