Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 46

Ultrasonic testing slide 1

definition of ultrasound

infrasonic vibration with a frequency: 1.....16 Hz

Example: Oscillation of Buildings, earthquake

Acoustics: 16 Hz....20.000 Hz
detectable by human ears

Ultrasound: more than 20.000 Hz

Non destructive testing: 1... . I0 M

O 2001 SLV Duisburg Niederlassung der GSlrnbH


No reproduction without prior permission!
Ultrasonic testing slide 2

The echo method

O 2001 SLV Duisburg Niederlassung der GSlmbH


No reproduction without prior permission!
Ultrasonic testing slide 3

velocity
*
spring

mass

Oscillation = periodical altering physical value

f frequency = number of oscillations per time

1 Hertz = 1 oscillation per second


1 k Hz = 1000 oscillations per second
1 MHz = 1000 000 oscillations per second

O 2001 SLV Duisburg Niederlassung der GSlmbH


No reproduct~onwithout prior permission!
Ultrasonic testing slide 4

Waves

no coupling

elastic coupling

r \
wave = propagation of oscillations
,

O 2001 SLV Duisburg Niederlassung der GSlmbH


No reproduction without prior permission!
Ultrasonic testing slide 5

1 waves

( transverse waves (shear waves): \


Direction of propagation -

Longitudinal waves:

idirectian of propagation r

propagation in solid, fluid or gaseous substances

63 2001 SLV Duisburg Niederlassung der GSlmbH


No reproduction without prior permission!
Ultrasonic testing slide 6

undamped and damped oscillations

undamped oscillation

[damped oscillations]

O 2001 SLV Duisburg Niederlassung der GSlmbH


No reproduction w~thoutprior permission!
Ultrasonic testing slide 7

velocity of sound

velocity in the material


wavelength
frequency

Example: calculate the wavelength of a longitudinal wave in steel;


the frequency is 4 MHz

the velocity of sound depends on the elastic modulus


and the density of the material

O 2001 SLV Duisburg Niederlassung der GSlmbH


No reproduction without prior permission!
Ultrasonic testing slide 8

Straight beam probe

conection socket
I

adaption
/ coil
cable

Damping body

Transducer

protective
covering

straight beam probe

The transducer transmits and receives ultrasonic waves.

p~

O 2001 SLV Duisburg Niederlassung der GSlrnbH


N o reproduction without prior permission!
Ultrasonic testing slide 9

Probes

f \

reverse piezo-electric effect

electric
voltage > mechanical
osciIIations

; piezo-electric effect

1 mechanical
oscillations I_$
electric
voltage
"

O 2001 SLV Duisburg Niederlassung der GSlmbH


No reproduction without prior permission!
Ultrasonic testing slide 10

sound field

Transducer Focus angle of


-a \ beam axis divergency
I

+-- --
I Near Field
- - -
I
- - 7 - a

O 2001 SLV Duisburg Niederlassung der GSlmbH


No reproduct~onwithout prior permission!
Ultrasonic testing slide 11

1 echo method

transmission pulse indication -wall echo


1

/'
transducer

S sound path length [mm]


K scale-factor [mm 1 scale]
T Position on the screen [scales]

O 2001 SLV Duisburg Niederlassung der GSlmbH


No reproduction without prior permission!
Ultrasonic testing slide 12

echo method

I Pulse length: 11.....10 vs

1 pulse repetition frequency: 5 0 Hz, 1OOHr, ...

Example: test frequency: 2 MHz


pulse length: 1 i.rs
Pulse repetition fre-
quency:

length of one oscillation:

T=-=
1 1 S
f 2 lo6 oscillation

Number of oscillations per pulse:

pulse length - 1 lop6 2 lo6 s oscillations


n= - = 2 oscillations
Z 1 S

O 2001 SLV Duisburg Niederlassung der GSlmbH


No reproduction without prior permission!
Ultrasonic testing slide 13

Ultrasonic equipment

Pulse generator

Objekt under test

O 2001 SLV Duisburg Niederlassung der GSlmbH


No reproduct~onwithout prior permission!
Ultrasonic testing slide 14

1 sound waves at interfaces

c \

acoustic impedance
L 1

acoustic impedance = p-c

the acoustic impedance depends on the elastic properties of a material.

I ~nterfaces 1
high difference in acoustic impedance
> I a high percentage of sound is reflected

Example: the acoustic impedance of air is very different from the acous
tic impedance of steel. A very high percentage of the ultrasonic sound i

Medium

Gr enzf lac he
Medium
0

angle of incident sound = angle of reflected sound

O 2001 SLV Duisburg Niederlassung der GSlmbH


No reproduction without prior permission!
Ultrasonic testing slide 15

Refraction

O 2001 SLV Duisburg Niederlassung der GSlmbH


No reproduct~onwithout prior permission!
Ultrasonic testing slide 16

Angle beam probe

Adaptor coil Housing

conectisn socket

welded plate with


lack of fusion

O 2001 SLV Duisburg Niederlassung der GSlrnbH


No reproduction w~thoutprior permission!
Ultrasonic testing slide 17

f \

Location of reflectors

O 2001 SLV Duisburg Niederlassung der GSlmbH


No reproduction without prior permission!
Ultrasonic testing slide 18

Procedure of a straight beam probe calibration


I I

time base range depends on geometry of the object to be tested.


Steps to calibrate the ultrasonic test instrument:

Selection of the time base range:


for instance SB= I 0 0 mm
calculation of the scale factor "K"

K = -S B m it T = 10 SkT
T
K=10 mm1Division
Selection of the calibration length
e.g. S, = 25 mm (calibration block "KI")
Calculating the calibration echoes and set down the result into a table

Si [mm] Ti[SKT]

Set the echoes in the calculated positions


Check the calibration with a length not used before.
(e.g.: 100 mm at calibration block "K 1").

O 2001 SLV Duisburg Niederlassung der GSlrnbH


No reproduction without prior permission!
Ultrasonic testing slide 19

Calibrating with shortened projection distance

advantages?

easy location of reflectors!

how does it work?

I e.g. by means of the K1 I

O 2001 SLV Duisburg Niederlassung der GSlrnbH


No reproduction without prior permission!
Ultrasonic testing slide 20

example: table for the calibration with a 45"-angle beam probe


with x = 13 mm and a time base range aBL= 200 mm

for a time base range of as' = 200 mm the following table can be
calculated:

ai6[mm] T[Skt]
58 2,9
128 6,4
199 10

using the shortened projection distance calibration the distance from the
reflector to the front edge of the probe is easy to calculate:

the depth of the reflector can be calculated with the following formula:

a + x
b =
tan a
[ mm I

O 2001 SLV Duisburg Niederlassung der GSlmbH


N o reproduction without prior permission!
Ultrasonic testing level 2 page 72

26 sensitivity adjustment and determination of the disc-shaped


reflectors which correlates with a discontinuity
,

+ Reproductive test results


+ Defined probability to detect discontinuities

Calculatina in dB:
Echo height of reflector 1: 40%
Echo height of reflector 2: 80%

AV=-20. Log-H2
HI
0,4
A V = -20 Log -[dB]= 6dB
038
echo height on relation of difference in
the sreen echo heights gain [dB]

Halving of the echo height on the screen means a difference in gain of 6


dB.

Schmeink O 2002 SLV Duisburg GmbH Ultraschallprufung


Nachdmck und unbcfugte Weitergabc sind unrulassig und wcrdcn geseklich verfolgt
Ultrasonic testing level 2 page 73

I--
Echo height [%I Relation of echo
heights

Different sensitivities lead to different test results

Gain 42 dB

Schmeink O 2002 SLV Duisburg GmbH Ultraschallpriifung


Nachdmck und unbefugtc Weitergabe sind unzulassig und werdcn gesetrlich verfolgt
Ultrasonic testing level 2 page 74

Gain adjustment be means of known reflectors:

+ Side drilled hole


+ Flat bottomed hole
+ rabbet

example:

1. generating the back wall echo

2. setting the back wall echo to 80% on the screen by means of the dB
control

Registrierschwelle
/'

3. increasing the gain to a certain level. E.g. 12 dB


4, defining the evaluation level at 40% screen height (for instance).

- - -- - - - - - - -

Schmeink O 2002 SLV Duisburg GmbH Ultraschallprufung


Nachdmck und unbefugte We~tcrgabcm d unrulass~gund werden gcsctzl~chverfolgt
Ultrasonic testing level 2 page 75

Example No 2: side drilled hole

conditions: Ultrasonic beam has to propagate to the side drilled hole with its
whole width.

FBI(J .-

The diameter of the side drilled hole has to exceed 1,5A

1) generating the echo of the side drilled hole and setting it to 80% of
screen height.

Evaluation level
/'

2) increasing the gain at 6 dB. (for instance)

3) defining the evaluation level. In this example 40% of screen height was
chosen.
disadvantage: evaluation of the echoes does not depend on the distance

Schmcink O 2002 SLV Duisburg GmbH Ultraschallpriifung


Nachdmck und unbefugte Weilergabc sind unzulassig und werden gesetrlich vcrfolgt
Ultrasonic testing level 2 page 76

Distance - Amplitude correction curve

L ~ i s t a n c -eAmplitude correction curve

Schmeink O 2002 SLV Duisburg GmbH Ultraschallprijfung


Nachdruck und unbefugte Wcitcrgabe sind unzulssng und werdcn gesetzlich verfolgt
Ultrasonic testing level 2 page 77

Distance - Amplitude correction curve


in two sections

+ the Distance - Amplitude correction curve should not exceed 80% and
20% of screen height.

Schrneink O 2002 SLV Duisburg GmbH Ultraschallprilfung


Nachdmck und unbcfugte Watcrgabc smd unzulassig und wcrdcn gcsctrl~chverfolgt
Ultrasonic testing level 2 page 78

Evaluating the echo height by means of the Amplitude correction curve

problem: The surface roughness of the calibration block is different


from the surface roughness of the test piece.

Resolution: gain of the test facility has to be increased to a certain


amount called - ,,Transfer correction AVTU

Schmeink O 2002 SLV Duisburg GmbH Ultraschallpriifung


Nachdmck und unhcfugte Weitergabc sind unzulissig und werden gcsctrhch verlolgl
Ultrasonic testing level 2 page 79

27 The DGS diagram

basic: reflection of flat bottom holes (angle of incident sound:

fictitious reflector

Distance correction
/ curve

figure 27.1: construction of the distance correction curve using flat bottom holes.

Schmeink O 2002 SLV Duisburg GmbH Ultraschallprufung


Nachdmck und unbcfugte Weitergabc smd u ~ u l a s s i gund werden gcsctzllch verfolgt
Ultrasonic testing level 2 page 80

Calculation of reflection properties

Back wall Flat bottom hole Side drilled hole

Sound field section

top view

--
@YBl
00
Relation of
echo heights

Hz--
HI

Difference in
gain

Difference in
gain for
S2=2S1
Or D2=2D1

Calculation
of s2or. D2
with AV

rabbet: properties of reflection are not defined!

Schmeink O 2002 SLV Duisburg GmbH Ultraschallpriifung


Nachdruck und unhefugle Wc~tergahesmd unmlass~gund werden gesehl~chverfolgt
Ultrasonic testing level 2 page 81

The flat bottom hole


advan- - increasing the size of the reflector results in 12 dB differ-
tages: ence of gain (in comparison to a side drilled hole 3 dB it is a
lot)
- the properties of reflection of a flat bottom hole are repre-
sentative for flat reflectors
(a side drilled hole has reflection properties like a voluminous
reflector)
disad- - the geometry of the test piece depends on the angle of the
vantage: probe (the side drilled hole can be used at each angle)
- it is a high effort to machine a flat bottom hole.
c.w

Calculating curves of flat bottom holes.


+ diagram on paper

0 500 1000
distance

logarithmic scales + less reading error.

0 500 1000

I distance

Schmeink O 2002 SLV Duisburg GmbH UltraschallprLifung


Nachdruck und unbefugte Weitergabc smd umulassig und werden gesetzlich verfolgl
Ultrasonic testing level 2 page 82

Calculation of the echo heights and logarithmic scales of the distance.

DGS diagram

m h

distance

DGS means: D = distance


G = gain
S = size

Schrneink O 2002 SLV Duisburg GmbH Ultraschallprufung


Nachdruck und unbefugte Wc~tcrgabesind unzulass~gund werden gesetrlich verfolgt
Ultrasonic testing level 2 page 83

I DGS-diaarams: specific for the probe.

Schmeink O 2002 SLV Duisburg GmbH Ultraschallprijfung


Nachdmck und unbefugte Weitergabe sind un~ulassigund werden gesetrlich vcrfolgt
Ultrasonic testing level 2 page 84

27.1 Gain adjustment

test piece: weld 30 mm, probe MWB 45,4 MHz

maximum distance to test the weld: 85 mm.

Gain adjustment: 25 mm-radius of calibration block No. 2.

This radius has nearly the same reflection properties like a back wall.

-+ referencepoint in DGS diagram

echo of 25mmradius is set to a defined height on the screen e.g. 80 %.


Horizontal line trough this point is the reference line.
Write down the gain of the facility VJ.

eference height

MWB 45-4,
V J = 12dB

Schmeink O 2002 SLV Duisburg GmbH Ultraschallpriifung


Nachdruck und unbefugte Weitcrgabe sind unzul8ssig und werdcn gesetrlich vcrfolgl
Ultrasonic testing level 2 page 85

acceptance: sensitivity should is fixed with a flat bottom hole of 2mm di-
ameter (e. g. in a standard)

additional gain in comparison to the back wall echo can be found in the
DGS diagram. The sensitivity of a 2mm flat bottom hole is at the maximum
distance which is necessary to test the weld (85 mm). (at worst).

S {inch] .2 . .a 1.2 1.6 2~ 3.2 4 B 12 18 2 1 32 40 aa


0 0

10 to

20 20

30 30

40 $0

50 50

60 50

70 70

80 80
5 10 20 30 10 8a 80 100 200 300 400 000 800 trn 2m

The gain of the test facility can be calculated:

V, = V, + AV

example: VJ = 12 dB
AV = 26 dB (from DGS diagram)
VR = 38 dB

Schmeink O 2002 SLV Duisburg GmbH Ultraschallprijfung


Nachdmck und unbcfugtc Wcltcrgabc smd unzulassig und werden gesetzlich vcrfolgt
Ultrasonic testing level 2 page 86

height

\---/ 100, St MWB45N.


VR= 38dB
maximum distance
for testing the weld

80% height on the screen at 85 mm distance means a sensitivity a 2 mm flat bottom


hole.
Discontinuities found at shorter distances exceed 80 % of the screen.

example:

I an echo of a discontinuity at 42 mm exceeds the reference height with 14 dB


I

Schmcink O 2002 SLV Duisburg GmbH Ultraschallpriifung


Nachdmck und unbefugte Wcitcrgabe sind unzulassig und werden gcsctzlich verfolgt
Ultrasonic testing level 2 page 87

I Result: the discontinuity reflects like a flat bottom hole with 3 mm in di- I
1 ameter.

Schmeink O 2002 SLV Duisburg GmbH Ultraschallpriifung


Nachdruck und unhefugte Weitcrgabe smd unzul%ssigund werden gesetzl~chverfolgt
Ultrasonic testing level 2 page 88

27.2 Construction of a distance correction curve by means of the DGS diagram

--
1 10 10 30 ID 10 40 I00 ZOO 300 4013 BOO I 0 0 lrn 2m

distance [mm] gain [dB] Avs Echo height [%I


25 12 0 80 (chosen)
50 15 3 57
100 24 12 20
150 30 18 10
200 34 20 8

/
reference point

'=L
screen

correction curve

Schmeink O 2002 SLV Duisburg GmbH Ultraschallpriifung


Nachdmck und unbefugte Weitergabc smd umul&sig und werden gesetrlich verfolgt
Ultrasonic testing level 2 page 89

NO, because:

1) the orientation of the defects is not known.

strong echo no echo

Schmeink O 2002 SLV Duisburg GmbH Ultraschallpriifung


Nachdmck und unbefugte Weitergabe sind unrulassig und werden geseklich vcrfolgt
Ultrasonic testing level 2 page 90

2) The surface of the defect is not known.

rough surface

flat surface

Schmcink O 2002 SLV Duisburg GmbH Ultraschallprijfung


Nachdruck und unbefugte Wenergahc smd umulassig und werden gcsotzlich verfolgt
Ultrasonic testing level 2 page 91

3) the echo of the defect depends on the resonant frequency of the defect
(which is not known) and on the test frequency.

low frequency high frequency


-3 echo = no echo

Schmeink O 2002 SLV Duisburg GmbH Ultraschallprijfung


Nachdruck und unbefugtc Weltergabc smd unrulXssig und werdcn geselclich verfolgt
Ultrasonic testing level 2 page 92

Has the DGS diagram


any sense?

Clear definition of

+ Gain adjustment
+ Evaluation- 1 acceptance level

Schmeink O 2002 SLV Duisburg GmbH Ultraschallprijfung


Nachdruck und unbefugte Weitergahc sind unrulissig und werden gesetzlich verfolgt
formulary for ultrasonic testinq

calibrating in sound path length

SB time base range [mmI

k scale factor [mmlSkt]

Sj calibrating length [mml

T number of scales [Skt1

s sound path length

frequency, wavelength, sound field

1 f frequency [Hz = 1I S]
f =- z endurance of an [sl
'I; oscillation

h wave length [mml

c velocity of sound [mlsl

D transducer size [mml

9 divergence angle ["I

DB diameter of beam profile r [mmI


s sound path length [mmI

multiple-echo method
T, position of the nth echo [Skt1

n number of echoes [-I

d thickness of the material [mm]


reflection, refraction, conversion of wave mode

a1 incident angle ["I


a1 = P 1 PI angle of refraction ["I Medium I

sin a 1
sin a,
-
--1
C2
CI
C2
velocity of sound in
material 1 or 2

working with angle beam probes


[ ~ I S]
[m/sl j
: Medium 2

s sound path length [mml


a=s@sina a projected sound path [mml
length

b depth of a reflector
b=s*cosa

b=- a
tan a
distance from echo
aV=a-x X
receiving point to the edge [mm]
of the probe

position of the reflector relative to the zero point

A'
q = A'-& q position of the reflector
relative to the zero point
[mm]
* q 4 a'
0
I

und path length of a skip, skip distance

SP sound path length of a [mml


SP -
- 2dIcosa skip

ap skip distance
a, = 2 d a t a n a
materials different from steel
sound path length in
material x
sound path length in steel
velocity of sound in
material x
velocity of sound in steel

shortened projection distance

shortened projection
distance

a'+x depth of the reflector


b=
tan a

in different materials

aluminium 1 6300 - 6340


I cast I 4600 2160 - 2650
copper 1 4700 2260
brass 3800 - 4400 2050 - 2120
steel 5920 3255
bariumtitanate 6050
Plexiglas 2740 1430
PVC, hard 2250 1060
water 1480
I oil I 1250 -1740
I

-4
+1

calibration: SB=250mm, a=45"

S[mm] T[SKT]
100 4
200 8
control by the edge of K1 5.7

1 measure I 1 calculate I
Pos. T[Skt] A'[mm] S a a' b t
1 43
2 3,6
3 5,3 .
1 formula I meaning 1 formula and declarations
height of echo H reference echo
relative height of echo

difference in
AH = 20 l g -2
echo height H1

AH
- division of "2 = 10rn
echo heights
-
i

I "2
3-
relative height
of echo t12 = H~ 10
#! ~ZW.
--
H~ = n1 10
AV
20 reference
echo
echo

Physical properties of some reflectors

F reflector

view from
the side
disk shaped reflector side drilled whole

view from
above

echo
heights
f4
relation o H

[difference

Вам также может понравиться