Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
There are few human beings, good or bad, who could believe in
such things without being gripped by fear. And fear breeds vio-
lence. In this case the violence led during the sixteenth and seven-
teenth centuries to the death by burning of some tens of thousands
of women.
The question how such a fateful shift in official belief came about
cannot be denied importance. What it has too often been denied
so far is an appropriate scholarly approach. The question is a
medieval one; and most of the excellent recent writers on witch-
craft (to say nothing of the not-so-excellent) have been anthropolo-
gists or post-renaissance historians, for whom the medieval ques-
tion is secondary. It is true that since Josef Hansen's big study
seventy-five years ago there have been exceptions (notably J. B.
Russell of California). But the subject has not enjoyed the kind of
back-and-forth debate which best guarantees a thorough scrutiny of
Fair of France, for ritual apostasy and devil worship. (The crucial
role of Philip the Fair's totalitarian government in the prehistory
of the witch-trials is rightly emphasised in this and other respects.)
A third matrix - smaller, but closer this time to the maleficia of
old women - was the family group. In 1324-5 Dame Alice Kyteler
of Kilkenny was tried for sorcery in the company of eleven others
related or allied to her family. Here, then, were several ante-
cedents to the notion of a diabolical conspiracy. Before such a
notion could attach to maleficii or ritual magicians in general,
only one obstacle remained to be overcome. Heretics, Templars
and small family groups were at least known to meet behind
closed doors, whatever they did or did not do there. Witches and
magicians, by contrast, were traditionally individuals, scattered
among towns and villages. That they should meet in big assem-
blies without being seen, was not only not known; it was physically
impossible. How on earth could all those old women travel so far
McFarlane, Thomas and others have taught us, for later periods,
to read the beliefs about witches partly in terms of social tensions.
Professor Cohn deliberately plays down this approach, no doubt
to leave himself freer for his own. But the very facts he cites point
beyond the bounds he has set himself. For one thing there is the
inevitable question of 'capitalism'. Some of the notorious early
victims of demonolatry — and infanticide — charges were people
who had accumulated a dangerous amount of money. The Orleans
heretics of loss were said to have been given 'heaps of money' by
the devil. In 1300 the dizzily successful upstart Guichard of Troyes
was accused of sorcery: chief witnesses were an archdeacon (dioc-
esan general business-manager) and the agent of an Italian bank.
The Templars of course were the French king's bankers before
he struck them down. Dame Alice Kyteler and her usurer-husband,
in their turn, were substantial creditors to their accusers. A larger
Alexander Murray