Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
1 Those which are manifest to the senses, i.e., they can be Mortgage Law considers growing crops as personal
seen and touched. property.
2 Those which are not manifest to the senses & conceived 5 Davao Sawmill v. Castillo, 61 Phil. 709 (machineries
only by understanding, e.g. rights or credits. placed by lessee); Mindanao Bus v. City Assessor, 6 SCRA
3 (1) movable or immovable, (2) public or private, (3) 197 (machineries were not essential & principal elements of
generic or specific, (4) present or future, (5) divisible or the industry); Caltex v. Central Board, 114 SCRA 296
indivisible, (6) principal or accessory, (7) fungible or non- (machineries attached or fixed permanently to the gas
fungible, (8) consumable or non-consumable, (9) within or station site or embedded therein).
6 Animals must have intent to return when outside their
outside the commerce of man
4 But the Civil Code enumeration is not the only criterion as breeding places, e.g. homing pigeons.
to which properties are real or personal, e.g. the Chattel
(1) whether the object can be carried from place to A relation in private law by virtue of which a
place; thing pertaining to one person is completely subjected
(2) whether a change of location can be effected to his will in everything not prohibited by law or the
without injury to an immovable to which the object is concurrence with the rights of another.11
attached; and
(3) whether the object is included in any of the ten • SCOPE: It may be exercised over things or
paragraphs of Art. 415. rights (Art. 427)
7 8
Examples: Roads, canals, rivers, torrents, ports and Example: Government buildings.
bridges constructed by the State, banks, shores, 9 Examples: Forest lands, mines.
roadsteads and others of similar character (Art. 420, par. 10 Laurel v. Garcia, 187 SCRA 797
1), and provincial roads, city streets, municipal streets, 11 TOLENTINO, citing SCIALOJA & RUGGIERO.
squares, fountains, public waters, promenades and public
works for public service paid for by said provinces, cities or
municipalities (Art. 424, par. 1).
Civil Law - Property
12 Chan v. Iglesia ni Cristo, GR 160283, 10/14/06 13 Two views on what “by chance” means: (1) no purpose
(trespassers made jointly liable for damages for their or intent to look for the treasure, per TOLENTINO & JURADO,
tortious act of digging a tunnel traversing the land of the citing Spanish commentators; (2) by stroke of good luck,
church and directly under the church in their quest for per PARAS, based on the intent of the Code Commission
hidden treasure) (Dean Capistrano & Dean Francisco).
WHEN IS OWNER NOT ENTITLED TO THE right to remove them to indemnity
FRUITS if he can do so (Art. 449 by
(1) possession in good faith by another without injury to the analogy)
person;Art 544 (1) work constructed.
(2) usufruct; Art 566, NCC
(3) lease of land; and LANDOWNER Landowner shall *Same rule as
(4) antichresisArt 2132, NCC IN BAD FAITH pay the value of the when both the
materials, plus landowner and
REIMBURSEMENT, WHEN NEEDED damages. the owner of
He who receives the fruits has the obligation Alternatively, the the
owner of the materials are
to pay the expenses made by a third person in their
materials has the in good faith*
production, gathering and preservation. (Art. 443)
right to remove
them, even though
their removal will
B. ACCESSION INDUSTRIAL cause injury to the
work constructed,
PURPOSE plus the right to be
To avoid a state of forced co-ownership paid damages.
between the owner of the land and the owner of the
improvement (or materials) 2. RULE WHEN ON ONE’S LAND, ANOTHER
BUILDS, PLANTS OR SOWS (ARTS. 448-456)
The rules depend on the good faith or bad
faith of the landowner and the builder/planter/sower BUILDER/PLANTER/ BUILDER/PLAN
(or the owner of the materials) LANDOWN SOWER IN GOOD TER/SOWER
ER FAITH IN BAD FAITH
There is BAD FAITH whenever the act was done IN GOOD The landowner has The builder /
with the landowner’s knowledge and without FAITH the following planter / sower
opposition on his part (Art. 453, 2nd para.) [this options:14 loses to the
is also applicable to the owner of the (1) appropriate landowner what
materials], or when the builder knows that he as his own the he built, planted
is building on the land of another or there is a building, trees or or sown,
defect or flaw in his title over the land (see Art. plants, after payment without right to
526 by analogy). of the indemnity Arts. indemnity. He
54620 and 548,15 or shall moreover
There is GOOD FAITH whenever there is lack of pay damages to
such an awareness. Good faith is always the landowner
(2) oblige the
presumed and upon him who alleges bad faith (Arts. 449,
builder / planter to pay 451). However,
rests the burden of proof. (Art. 527) Good faith the price of the land,22 he shall be
does not necessarily exclude negligence and the sower, the entitled to
which gives right to damages (Art. 456). proper rent. However, reimbursement
the builder / planter from the
If there is bad faith on the part of both the cannot be obliged to landowner of
landowner and the builder (or the owner of the buy the land if its the necessary
materials), the bad faith of one neutralizes that value is considerably expenses made
of the other, so that both will be considered in more than that of the for the
good faith. (Art. 453) building or trees. In preservation of
such case, he shall the land (Art.
1. RULE WHEN LANDOWNER BUILDS WITH THE pay reasonable rent, 452), without
MATERIALS OF ANOTHER (ART. 447) right of
based on the terms
OWNER OF OWNER OF retention (Art.
agreed upon by the
MATERIALS IN MATERIALS 546).
parties or fixed by the
GOOD FAITH IN BAD court. (Art. 448)
FAITH If the landowner
does not wish to
LANDOWNER Landowner shall The owner of
utilize the
IN GOOD pay the value of the the materials building, trees
FAITH materials. However, loses the or plants, he
the owner of the materials has the
materials has the without right following
14The landowner cannot refuse to exercise any of the two The court cannot order the landowner to sell his land to
options. He can even be compelled by the builder to the builder because the decision on what option to take
exercise his option (Tecnogas v. CA, 268 SCRA 5). Note belongs to the landowner. The court can only order the
that demolition or removal is not one of the options landowner to exercise the options granted to him under Art.
granted (Ibid.). It is only after the landowner has chosen to 448 (Ignao v. IAC, 193 SCRA 17).
sell at a reasonable price and the builder failed to pay that
demolition can be demanded (Depra v. Dumlao, 136
SCRA 475). Necessary and useful expenses
Civil Law - Property
16 21
Del Campo v. Abesia, 160 SCRA 379; Ignao v. IAC, 193 No alluvion if the accretion took place on a land adjoining
SCRA 1. the sea, i.e., foreshore land (Heirs of Navarro v. IAC, 268
17 Pecson v. CA, 244 SCRA 407. SCRA 74).
18 The Civil Code provided only for these four situations. 22 Meneses v. CA, 246 SCRA 162; Government v. Colegio
19 Bagaipo v. CA, GR 116290, 12/8/00 (gradual, accretion, de San Jose, 53 Phil. 423, citing Arts. 77 & 84 of the
not avulsion). Spanish Law of Waters of 3 August 1866.
20 The accretion must be the exclusive work of nature, not 23 Reynante v. CA, 207 SCRA 794.
24 26
Government v. Colegio de San Jose, 53 Phil. 423. Jagualing v. CA, 194 SCRA 607.
(Also, Torrens Title does not protect riparian owner 27 E.g. inclusion (a gem is attached to a gold ring),
against diminution of area of his land through gradual soldering, weaving, painting & writing.
changes in the course of the adjoining stream, 28 Applied successively. In case of painting & sculpture,
Bagaipo vs. CA, GR 116290, 12/8/00) 32 Gulla v. writings, printed matter, engraving & lithographs, the board,
Heirs of Labrador, GR 149418, 7/27/06. metal, stone, canvas, paper or parchment is deemed the
25 The rules apply only to natural change in the course of the
accessory thing (Art. 468, 2nd para.)
river, not when the change is due to acts of man, e.g.
dumping of garbage (Ronquillo v. CA, 195 SCRA 433).
Civil Law - Property
29 Faja v. CA, 75 SCRA 441; Spouses Mamadsual v. 199SCRA 646). However, the mere fact that the deed
Moson, 190 SCRA 82. purports to transfer a concrete portion does not per se
30 Mendizabel v. Apao, GR 143185, 2/20/2006. render the sale void. It is valid, but only with respect to the
31 Any stipulation in the contract to the contrary shall be ideal share of the selling co-owner & subject to the results
void (Art. 485). of the partition upon the termination of the co-ownership.
34 The co-ownership of the thing can still be validly
32 A co-owner may sue not only a third person, but also
another co-owner who takes exclusive possession and terminated under Art. 498, by allotting the property to one
asserts exclusive ownership of the property, in order to of the co-owners who shall indemnify the others or by
obtain recognition of the co-ownership. (De Guia v. CA, 413 selling the property, with the proceeds distributed among
SCRA 114) the co-owners.
35 Mariategui v. CA, 205 SCRA 337; Delima v. CA, 201
33 Unless there is already a factual partition or termination
reconveyance within 10 years from registration is CONDOMINIUM ACT (R.A. No. 4726)
available to the other co-owners.36
COMMON AREAS:
Question: Is redemption of the foreclosed co-owned Condominium owners are co-owners of the
land by only one of the co-owners a repudiation of the common areas of the condominium project (Sec. 2)
co-ownership?
Answer: No. Redemption is not one of the modes of PARTITION
terminating a co-ownership. Instead, redemption One or more of the condominium owners may
inures to the benefit of all the co-owners, with the bring an action for partition of the entire condominium
redeeming co-owner entitled only to reimbursement of project, as if all the condominium owners are co-
the redemption price.37 owners of the project in the following instances:
A. The project has not been substantially rebuilt or
OBLIGATIONS OF CO-OWNERS: repaired 3 years after a material part of the
project has been damaged or destroyed,
1. Share in the expenses for B. More than 30% of the condominium owners are
a. necessary repairs;38 opposed to the repair or restoration of the
b. improvements;39 and project after damage to the project which
c. embellishment40 (Art. 489) rendered ½ or more of the units untenantable,
C. More than 50% of the condominium owners are
2. Not alter the thing owned in common without opposed to the repair, restoration, remodeling or
the consent of all the other co-owners (Art. modernization of the project which has been in
491) existence for more than 50 years and is obsolete
and uneconomic,
3. Get the consent of majority of the co-owners D. More than 70% of the condominium owners are
for the administration of the common property opposed to continuation of the project after
(Art. 492) expropriation or condemnation of a material
portion thereof, and
TERMINATION OF CO-OWNERSHIP: E. The project is no longer viable after it or a
material part thereof has been condemned or
1. Partition, written or oral, 41 judicial or expropriated. (Sec. 8)
extrajudicial
VI. POSSESSION
EFFECT ON THIRD PARTIES
Rights of third parties relating to mortgage, It is the holding of a thing or the enjoyment of
servitude or any other real rights shall be respected a right. (Art. 523)
(Art. 499). Creditors may take part in the partition and
object to it being effected without their concurrence, KINDS:
but they cannot impugn any partition already
executed, unless there has been fraud (Art. 497). IN ONE’S OWN NAME IN THE NAME OF ANOTHER
(Art. 524)
INCIDENTS
IN THE CONCEPT OF OWNER IN THE CONCEPT OF
Upon partition, there shall mutual accounting – possession by the HOLDER – possession by
of benefits received and reimbursements for expenses owner himself or one who one who does not assert
made. Each co-owner shall be liable for damages claims to be the owner a claim of ownership over
caused by reason of his negligence or fraud and for (Art. 525). Possession of the thing, as he
defects of title and quality of portion assigned to each this kind can ripen to acknowledges that
of the other co-owners. (Arts. 500-501) ownership, by ownership belongs to
prescription (Art. 540) another person (Art. 525)
2. Prescription, after valid repudiation, by one of
the co-owners.
42 Rosales v. Castelltort, GR 157044, 10/5/05 (relied on the Pascual, 21 SCRA 146) 56 Catchuela v. Francisco, 98
survey made by geodetic engineer and the stone SCRA 172.
monuments placed by the engineer’s employees) 48 Good faith is always presumed, and upon him who
43 E.g. creditor did not know that antichresis of land
alleges bad faith on the part of a possessor rests the
covered by the Homestead Law is violative of such law burden of proof. (Art. 527)
(Kasilag v. Rodriguez, 69 Phil. 217). 49 It is presumed that possession continues to be enjoyed
44 Firme v. Bukal Enterprises, GR 146608, 10/23/03 (no
in the same character in which it was acquired, until the
perfected contract of sale, yet construction was started); contrary is proved. (Art. 529)
NHA v. Baello, GR 200858, 8/7/13 (ejected from land by 50 A present possessor, who shows his possession at some
fully-armed military personnel during martial law); PNB v. previous time, is presumed to have held possession also
De Jesus, GR 149295, 9/2/03 (bank knew of the during the intermediate period, in the absence of proof to
encroachment at the time of purchase). the contrary. (Art. 554)
45 In case inheritance is accepted, possession is deemed to 51 One who recovers, according to law, possession unjustly
start from the moment of death, without interruption (Art. lost, shall be deemed for all purposes which may redound
533). to his benefit, to have enjoyed it without interruption. (Art.
46 Minor (including the insane, deaf mutes who cannot read 561)
52 A possessor in the concept of owner has in his favor the
& write, & those under civil interdiction) can acquire
material possession of a thing, but not possession by civil legal presumption that he possesses with a just title and he
acts, e.g. contracts cannot be obliged to show or prove it.
47 Bishop v. CA, 208 SCRA 636. Reason: A person who (Art. 541) However, for purposes of prescription, just title
occupies land of another at the latter’s tolerance is must be proved (Art. 1131)
necessarily bound by an implied promise that he will 53 Note: does not refer to natural damage resulting from
vacate upon demand, failing which a summary action for separation of accessory from principal, but damage or
ejectment is the proper remedy against him. (Calubayan v. injury that reduces the value of the thing.
Civil Law - Property
A possessor in bad faith is not entitled to the 3. Destruction or total loss or goes out of
fruits of the property. He shall reimburse the legitimate commerce
possessor of the fruits he received or the fruits which
the legitimate possessor could have received. (Art. 4. Possession by another
549)
• De facto possession of land is lost
RULES ON REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES after 1 year if no ejectment suit is filed.
(Arts. 546-549) • De jure possession of land is lost after
10 years if no accion publiciana is
KINDS OF POSSESSOR IN POSSESSOR IN BAD
GOOD FAITH FAITH
filed. After 10 years, accion
EXPENSE
reivindicatoria may still be filed,
unless acquisitive prescription has set
Necessary - entitled to - entitled to in.
reimbursement with reimbursement
right of retention without right of 5. Recovery of the thing by the lawful owner
retention
Useful - entitled to - not entitled to RULE ON MOVABLES
reimbursement with any reimbursement
right of retention - also cannot 1. Possession of movables acquired in
- may remove the good faith is equivalent to title. (Art. 559)
remove the improvement even if
improvement if it will it will not damage the • REQUISITES
not damage62 the principal thing
▪ (a) possession should be in
principal thing,
good faith,
unless the lawful
▪ (b) the former owner
possessor opts to
voluntarily parted with the
appropriate the
possession of the thing, and
thing with payment
▪ (c) possession is in the
of indemnity
concept of owner
For pure - not entitled to - not entitled to
luxury or reimbursement, but reimbursement, but
2. One who lost any movable or has
mere he may remove the he may remove the been unlawfully deprived thereof may recover
pleasure embellishment if it embellishment if it will it from the person in possession of the same.54
will not damage the not damage the (Art. 559, 1st para.)
principal principal
thing (in case the thing (in case the • EXCEPTION: However, the owner who
lawful possessor lawful possessor does lost a movable cannot recover the
does not prefer to not prefer to same, if the possessor thereof:
appropriate it) appropriate it)
▪ (a) has acquired it in good
- if the lawful - if lawful possessor
faith at a public sale, unless
possessor opts to opts to appropriate
he reimburses the price paid
appropriate the the embellishment,
therefor (Art. 559, 2nd para.),
embellishment, he he will be reimbursed
▪ (b) purchased it in a
will be reimbursed the value thereof at
merchant’s store, fairs or
the amount the time the lawful
possessor enters into markets (Art. 1505),
expended
the possession ▪ (c) purchased it in good faith
from one who has voidable
54No unlawful deprivation of object of contract of sale, if v. Santos, 184 SCRA 614; Chua Hai vs. Kapunan, 104
the purchase price was paid by a bouncing check. (EDCA Phil. 110) 64 Edu v. Gomez, 129 SCRA 603.
title thereto, which has not
been annulled at the time of 3. Alienate his right of usufruct
sale, or (d) has become the
owner of the thing through 4. Enjoy any increase which the thing in
acquisitive prescription. usufruct may acquire through accession,
the servitudes established in its favor and
• Movable can no longer be recovered all inherent benefits in general (Art. 571)
if in the hands of a buyer in good
faith.64 5. Use the thing in accordance with the
purpose for which it was intended, without
VII. USUFRUCT being liable for its deterioration through
ordinary wear and tear (Art. 573)
DEFINITION
The right to enjoy the property of another with 6. Right to make useful improvements or
the obligation of preserving its form and substance, expenses for mere pleasure, provided he
unless the title constituting it or the law otherwise does not alter the thing’s form or
provides. (Art. 562) substance. He has no right to be
indemnified for the improvements.
ESSENTIAL CHARACTERISTICS: However, he may remove them if no
(1) real right; damage will be done to the thing in
(2) temporary in nature or duration; and usufruct. (Art. 579)
(3) with the purpose of enjoying the benefits of
the object as a consequence of normal use or 7. Right to set-off the improvements he may
exploitation have made on the property against any
damage to the same (Art. 580)
OBJECT OF USUFRUCT:
all property, including consumables (Art. 574) 8. Right not to be prejudiced by any works or
and improvements made by the owner (Art.
transmissible rights (Art. 564) 595)
55 56
E.g. Art. 226, Family Code (parents as usufructuaries of Refers to usufruct of consumable things (Art. 574).
minor children’s property).
Civil Law - Property
3. Make ordinary repairs (Art. 592) Servient estate – the immovable subject to easement
57 60
An encumbrance imposed upon an immovable for the Easement which prohibits the owner of the servient
benefit of another immovable belonging to a different estate from doing something which he could lawfully do if
owner. (Art. 613) the easement did not exist. (Art. 616)
58 Easement established for the benefit of a community, or 61 Easement established by law. (Art. 619)
62 Easement established by the will of the owners. (Art.
of one or more persons to whom the encumbered estate
does not belong. (Art. 614) 619)
59 Easement which requires the owner of the servient
EXTINGUISHMENT:
MODES OF ACQUISITION (1) Merger,
(2) Non-user for 10 years,
1. Title [Art. 622] (3) estate fell into such a condition that the
estate cannot be used,
(4) expiration of term or fulfillment of the
All kinds of easements, whether continuous or
condition,
discontinuous, apparent or non-apparent, can be
(5) renunciation,
acquired by title.
(6) redemption
Note: Art. 624 – The existence of an apparent
LEGAL VS. VOLUNTARY EASEMENTS:
sign of easement between two estates, established or
(1) Legal easements are established by law,
maintained by the owner of both, shall be considered,
while voluntary easements are established by will of
should either of them be alienated, as a title in order
the owners [Art. 619].
that the easement may continue actively and
(2) Legal easements have for their purpose
passively, unless at the time the ownership of the two
either public use or the interest of private persons
estates is divided, the contrary should be provided in
[Art.634], while voluntary easements have for their
the title of conveyance of either of them, or the sign of
purpose the interest of the parties to the agreement
aforesaid should be removed before the execution of
establishing the easement.
the deed. This provision shall also apply in case of the
division of a thing owned in common by two or more
persons. THE DIFFERENT KINDS OF LEGAL
EASEMENTS
Example
In Tañedo vs. Bernad (165 SCRA 86), in the 1. RELATING TO WATERS
absence of a statement abolishing or extinguishing the
easement of drainage, the use of the septic tank a. NATURAL DRAINAGE OF LANDS
located on the servient estate is continued by lower estates are obliged to receive the
operation of law and the new owners of the servient waters which naturally flow from the higher estates
estate cannot impair the use of the easement. (Art. 637)
63 64
Liwag v. Happy Glen Loop Homeowners Association, GR Ronquillo v. Roco, 103 Phil. 84; Bogo-Medellin vs. CA,
189755, 7/4/12 (easement of water facility, consisting of GR 124699, 7/31/03 (railroad track)
deep well and overhead water tank, used by the
subdivision as sole source of water for more than 30 years)
Civil Law - Property
4. LIGHT & VIEW – Note: Whether, private or public, only nuisance per
allows the making of openings in walls or se can be summarily abated.
preventing the neighbors from building higher than
one’s windows. The Civil Code provides for the Any private person may abate a private
required distances for windows, depending on nuisance or even a public nuisance that is especially
whether they afford a direct (2 meters) or oblique injurious to him, so long as the following requisites are
(60 centimeters) view. Non-observance of the complied with:
required distances will not give rise to prescription (1) demand is first made upon the
(Art. 670). Prescription will only start when the owner or possessor of the property,
owner formally prohibits the adjoining owner from (2) such demand has been rejected,
blocking his property’s light and view. (3) abatement is approved by the
district health officer and executed with the
5. DRAINAGE OF BUILDINGS assistance of the local police, and
to give outlet to the rain water collected on the (4) the value of the destruction does
estate via drainage at the point of the contiguous not exceed P3,000 (Arts. 704, 706).
lands and tenements (Art. 676)
X. MODES OF ACQUIRING
6. INTERMEDIATE DISTANCES
no constructions or plantings can be done OWNERSHIP
without observing the distances provided by law,
e.g. if tall trees are planted near the dividing line CONCEPT
of two estates, the distance of at least 2 meters Mode is a legal means by which dominion or
from the boundary line should be observed; if ownership is created, transferred or destroyed. It is the
shrubs, at least 50 centimeters (Art. 679) actual process of acquisition or transfer of ownership
or real right. On the other hand, Title is the juridical
7. LATERAL & SUBJACENT SUPPORT justification for the acquisition or transfer of ownership
no person shall make such excavations upon or real right (e.g. title: contract of sale, mode: delivery)
his land as to deprive any adjacent land or building
of sufficient lateral or subjacent support (Art. 684) ORIGINAL MODES:
1. Occupation (of res nullius),
2. Intellectual Creation
IX. NUISANCE DERIVATIVE MODES:
1. Law (e.g. in case of accession),
DEFINITION
2. Donation,
Any act, omission, establishment, condition of
3. Succession,
property, or anything else, which:
65 Quimen v. CA, 257 SCRA 163. 6/30/14 (elevated and cemented portion of subdivision
66 street)
Encarnacion v. CA, 195 SCRA 74.
67 AC Enterprises v. Frabelle, 506 SCRA 625 (noise from
2. Imputation
to the donor
of any
criminal
offense or
any act
involving
moral
turpitude,
even though
he should
prove it,
unless the
crime has
been
committed
against the
donee
himself,
his/her
spouse or
children
under
his/her
authority;
3. Refusal to
support the
donor when
the donee is
legally or
morally
bound to do
so.
(Art.
765)
xXx
Ad astra per aspera