Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Edited by
J. A. RADLEY
MoSco, e.Chemo, FoSoDoCo, FoRoI.e.
The literature of starch has proliferated in the last ten years at an almost
geometric rate and a number of important changes and developments in the
technology of starch and its derivatives have taken place which make it
highly desirable to review these in some depth.
The immensity of the subject determined the writer to seek the assistance
of a number of prominent workers throughout the world.
Where older work contains factual information of present value it has
been retained, generally in the form of Additional References. These are
brief abstracts which will help specialised searches in a branch of the
subject to complete the information given in the text. Inclusion of dis-
jointed information can often lead to the loss of coherence and clarity,
and the device of the Additional References, whilst allowing smooth
presentation, also allows the inclusion of up-to-the-minute material
appearing after the main text has been written.
The rewarding techniques of transmission and scanning electron
microscopy have been dealt with for the first time in a book of this nature.
Apart from the immense amount of important practical and theoretical
detail required to produce and use starch for many applications in a
number of important industries, a thorough knowledge is also required of
a number of aspects for the successful buying and selling of starch. This
book was written and published contemporaneously with two others
entitled Starch Production Technology and Industrial Uses of Starch and
Its Derivatives. The three books together provide a wide coverage of
starch technology and chemistry with the self-contained individual
volumes providing precise information for specialist readers.
My most sincere thanks are due to the contributors for their most
helpful and ready co-operation in getting out a volume that is as up-to-date
v
vi PREFACE
Preface v
Index 215
vii
CHAPTER 1
The light microscope. In its simplest form, the light microscope is used
in conjunction with a tungsten filament lamp which can provide either top
or transmitted illumination. The latter is generally the more useful. Low
power magnification ( < x 100) is useful in assessing such items as 'extent
of aggregation' or 'purity'. Medium power ( x 100 to x 400) is suitable for
the identification and study of individual and small arrays of granules.
Higher powers (up to x 1500) may be required for studying granule
surface details and contaminants in gels. The modern microscope generally
has a turret carrying several objectives, permitting easy change of mag-
nifying power. Other features that have become fairly standard are:
Sub-stage filter carrier. A blue filter is often used to balance the yellow-
ness of the tungsten filament lamp. A green filter is normally used for
photomicrography.
These features are available for many modestly priced, as well as the
more expensive, standard instruments.
More specialised adaptions of the light microscope include:
The polarising microscope. In its least sophisticated (but still very useful)
form, this is an ordinary microscope having a polarising filter in its sub-
stage carrier and another polarising filter (analyser) held just above the
eyepiece (or in the eyepiece assembly) such that it can be rotated. Such a
simple form of polarising microscope is adequate for the observation of the
starch granule polarisation 'crosses'.
(drawing a drop of stain solution under the cover slip by means of a piece
of dry tissue held against the opposite edge). Dextrins and pregelatinised
starches require non-aqueous mountants. Glycerol and Neutral Mountant
are both suitable and the latter may be used for making semi-permanent
slides (Fig. 1.1). It is possible to irrigate and partly displace these mountants
with iodine/potassium iodide for the purpose of proving identity of, for
example, pregelatinised starch fragments in a food mix. Other mountants
that have found use include dioxane-sandarac gum, and clove oil. The
latter is said to make the fissures in diastatically corroded granules very
prominent. 3
In general, for the examination of starches, it is highly desirable to use a
microscope fitted with polarising and analysing filters, and a calibrated
FIG. 1.1. Yellow potato dextrin swelling in aqueous glycerine (x 300). As the granules
swell, the peeling-off of layers may be observed.
THE MICROSCOPY OF STARCH 5
(1) To reveal starch granules in situ, for example, in the plant tissues or
in a food product; and staining may indicate the approximate
proportion of starch present in admixture with other ingredients.
(2) To differentiate between the various kinds of starch.
(3) To differentiate between various modified starches.
(4) To reveal damage in granules.
cassava, 1·0. K. Baumann 19 used the fact that maize starch is less readily
swollen by 1·8 %potassium hydroxide solution than wheat or rye starches
and that the latter is ruptured more readily than wheat. Following
gelatinisation, the maize starch can be made more apparent by staining
with iodine. 20 Rye starch21 ,22 is also distinguished from other starches in
that the granules gelatinise faster in 9 % sodium salicylate solution. The
larger granules swell within one hour and lose birefringence. J. A. Radley23
has observed that 38 % formaldehyde solution swells potato, tapioca,
wheat and maize starches in that order, the swelling of potato and tapioca
being much more rapid.
Several textbooks have been written that provide very full descriptive data
of starches from a large number of sources. 24 - 29 The following descrip-
tions relate to a selection of starches of commercial importance, and the
reader is referred to the more specific literature for descriptive data
concerning those starches not mentioned.
1:
JP
'0
0)
'"
';::
01
0
0-
,.....,
~
,~
,,:,
1:
JP
"@
8...
0
c
,.....,
'S
l ~
,.....,
on
N
N
X
..c
...
(,)
.9
'"
0
~
0
p.,
I"j
£
THE MICROSCOPY OF STARCH 11
.,.,
41
"
cJ;;
O·
not show distinct striations or polarisation crosses, and the hilum is only
observed in a small number of grains. Granule size ranges from 35 JIm to
2 JIm and they are generally referred to as 'large' and 'small' granules.
The large granules are usually 25 to 35 JIm while the small ones are usually
2 to 8 JIm. The upper limit for size, according to O. Hoyer, 3 0 is 55 JIm.
When heated in water the granules swell, and at near boiling point,
they assume a characteristic curved shape, which has been used by
o. A. Sjostrom 31 to identify wheat starch in technical products. Rye
starch behaves similarly.
among the smaller granules bell-shaped ones are sometimes seen. Greenish
and Collin 25 state that, hat-shaped and bell-shaped ones are to be found
among the medium and smaller grains. Some grains have a very distinct
stellate central hilum and some show fine concentric rings. The granules
may be as large as 50 11m. J. G. A. Griffiths 34 has found that 5 to 11 %of
granules of diameter greater than 10 11m have stellate hila.
FIG. 1.5. An oxidised maize starch (a thin boiling maize starch made by oxidation)
( x 400): (top) normal light; (bottom) polarised light.
THE MICROSCOPY OF STARCH 15
" .
'l' ~ , ) .
~ /\ n ;- ' t'l ' :
~~o .I t
. , , f/, ,
(~
0 '
0 .9 ('I
n' n o ·'
18 EXAMINATION AND ANALYSIS OF STARCH
FIG. 1.9. St Vincent arrowroot starch (x400): (left) normal light; (right) polarised light.
\0
-
20 EXAMINATION AND ANALYSIS OF STARCH
THE MICROSCOPY OF STARCH 21
TABLE 1.1
Microscopical characteristics of various starches
Name Source Granule size Granule shape Hilum Striae Fissures Comments
5. Batata Ipomoea Components- Components- Distinct and Well marked Some compound
batatas 10--50/lm often hemi- excentric granules 2-12, but
spherical generally 4-5
Brazilan Simple 8-25 /lm Centric or sI. Distinct components. Mostly
arrowroot excentric single. Some simple
6. Banana Musa Longest diam. Round to rod Distinct, very Well marked
paradisiaca 7-58/lm shaped excentric
generally
24-48/lm
7. Buckwheat Polygonum 4--15.um Simple polygonal Contains character-
/agopyrum chiefly 9 .urn similar to rice istic compound
granules of 2-9
components which
are somewhat
rounded
8. Arum Arum 3-27.um chiefly WeIl marked Indistinct or Radial from Compound granules
esculentum 13-20.um absent hilem 2-10 components
of unequal size
9. Broad bean Vida/abia 20-40.um Simple reniform, Centric Visible but OccasionaIly,
oval or rounded not marked from hilum
10. BuIlrush Pennisetum 8-25 .um Irregular or Centric Not visible OccasionaIly
MiIIet typhoideum round,
(Nigeria) polygonal
11. Chestnut Castanea 1·5-3O .um Variously shaped. Not Not visible Occasional twin and
vulgaris Only few of Large-three observable triplet granules
intermediate or four-sided,
sizes heart, kidney
or club shaped.
SmaIl-
rounded, egg
or pear shaped
Name Source Granule size Granule shape Hilum Striae Fissures Comments
13. French bean Phaseolus 30-50 11m Rounded or oval Centric Fairly General, from
vulgaris marked hilum
14. Bean, Scarlet Phaseolus 20-35 Ilffi Rounded or oval Centric Not distinct General, Size differentiates
runner multif/orus radial from from French bean
hilum
19. Millet, Panicum 8 to 15 11m Polygonal or Centric and Not visible Sometimes sl.
Shama colonum Some up to rounded punctiform fissured
(India) 20 11m polygonal
20. Millet, Setaria 8-15 11m Rounded or Centric, Not visible Sometimes sl.
Italian italica polygonal fairly fissured
(India) distinct
21. Millet, Ragi Eleusine 6-20 pm Polygonal Centric, Not visible Sometimes sl.
coracana sometimes fissured
(India) faintly
fissured
22. Maranta Maranta 13-70 pm Similar to potato Sometimes Always Hilum often Always simple
(original arundinacea Chiefly Note size centric, visible, fissured in
Arrowroot) (West 27-54 pm difference more but not form of
Indies, often strong double
Jamaica, excentric curve like
Bermuda, flattened OJ
StVincent,
and Natal
23. Maranta Maranta 11-34 pm Simple Centric Only distinct Radial after Compound granules
nobilis after chromic observed very
chromic acid rarely, 2-5 small
acid treatment components
treatment
24. Mango Mangi/era 5-25 pm Mostly compound Very distinct Easily visible
indica very few simple
granules
25. Horse Aesculus Small 3-8 pm Round or Distinct and Concentrically Both simple and
Chestnut hippo- elliptical. often striated compound in small
castaneum Simple and fissured
some compound
(continues)
TABLE l.l-contd.
Name Source Granule size Granule shape Hilum Striae Fissures Comments
27. Waxy 6-30 pm Similar to maize Centric and Indistinct Distinct and Red iodine
Sorghum Chiefly about distinct radial from coloration
(Red Leoti) 15 J.lfD. hilum
30. White Dioscorea Small- Simple, irregular, Distinct Distinct Greyish yellow colour
Dioscorea alata 15-30 J.lfD. long, oval or elliptical excentricity
7-15 pm wide, or rounded of 1/5-1/7
large-45-90 J.lfD. triangular.
by 25-60 pm Larger
wide extremity of
granule often
truncated
31. Yellow Igname 8-55 11m Much tissue Not readily Fairly Intense greyish
Dioscorea indien present. visible distinct yellow to brown
jaune Elliptical, egg, except in and very colour
pear- or heart- glycerol, numerous
shaped, but do is then
not appear distinct
truncated
32. Red Igname 17-119 11m Parenchymatous Distinct. Distinct Dirty red powder.
Dioscorea indien tissue generally Excentric Colour of granules
rouge present. turns bright red
Granules have with acid, blue
red colour. with alkali
Like White
variety but
narrower
33. Zamia 5-75 11m Hemispherical or Not well Not well Radial Mostly compound
(Florida dome shaped. marked marked fissures granules, 2-8
arrowroot) Some with when when components, often
large flat faces fresh. In fresh. In 3 components in a
and sl. rounded commer- commer- row. Clusters of
ends (middle cial cial calcium oxalate
components of prepara- prepara- crystals 14-60 11m
rows of 3) tions- tions- in diameter,
distinct distinct valuable aid to
i den tifica ti on
tv
00
ss::
~...,
(5
Z
>
Z
t:I
>
~r
><
'"t;J
o.."
'"
~
::c
("l
::r:
FIG. 1.12. Edible canna starch (x 375): (le/t) normal light; (right) polarised light.
• ', . L. G •
~
.' "
FIG, 1.13. Green plantain starch (Musa pardisiaca L.) (x 188): (left) normal light; (right) polarised light.
tv
'C>
w
o
o 0
tl1
o C0 0
o 0 0 ~
~o . 0 ~
::l
.0 ()0'Oo a o
o z
0 0 "), ~()
(, rQO:n:) flcJ.cpO ~
QQ- ,~ (T oO
,PO 0 0 o 0 ~
~
~
en
\J o'rl
Q o~ en
>-3
>
::0
f, \ 0 0.0 ("l
0~ I II:
o
FIG. 1.14. White sweet potato starch (Ipomoea batatas) (x 375): (left) normal light; (right) polarised light.
THE MICROSCOPY OF STARCH 31
25/tm to 35/tm and the smallest 5/tm to 15/tm. The granules appear round
with a flat surface on one side containing a conical pit which extends to a
well defined excentric hilum. Some granules are very nearly circular. In
polarised light, a well defined dark cross is observed.
Table 1.1 lists brief microscopical details for a number of the less
common starches. Photomicrographs of some of these are shown in
Figs. 1.11-1.14.
REFERENCES
INTRODUCTION
For many years our knowledge of the physical structure and behaviour
of starch grains was based on evidence from study with the light micro-
scope. However, with that microscope it is not possible to explore the
so-called submicroscopic or 'fine' structure of starch. The smallest
resolution possible with the light microscope is about 0·2 pm.* Structures
with diameters smaller than this value cannot be seen because points
closer together than this distance cannot reflect light rays so that all will be
in the same phase. Cancellation of rays will occur and there will be no
discrete image.
Filoment
Electron gun
Co thode and Wehnelt
--+---'- Anode
....
Electro - : : : : Object ~
Object
__ - 1,:,_ /
Condenser lens
....
". :<r- ~
< :'
...- ........
mognet ic •••• I" .>
lens •••• '
[ .
••••
Electrons
FIG.2.1. (a) Focusing of the electron beam by an electromagnetic field created around
wire coils. (b) Focusing of a beam of light by a vitreous condenser lens.
36 EXAMINATION AND ANALYSIS OF STARCH
(2)
where N is the number of turns in the coil, I the current passing through it,
and V the voltage, i.e. the difference in potential between cathode and
anode. Thus, by varying the accelerating voltage, it is possible-with the
use of a simple potentiometer-to vary continuously the excitation factor
of the electromagnetic lens. Equation 2 also shows the need for stability in
voltage and current for the focusing of the electromagnetic lens; the
slightest variation in either will change the angle of convergence of the
electron beam-and this angle, being normally quite small, is extremely
sensitive for correct focusing. This problem of sensitivity is related to the
very short wavelength of electrons and to the small diameter of the
electron beam.
ELECTRON MICROSCOPY OF STARCH AND STARCH PRODUCTS 37
A=~ (3)
mv
where h is Planck's constant and m the mass of the electron, corrected for
the velocity v. An approximate value of A may be found from the relation-
ship, (150/V)t, V being the accelerating voltage. Thus A at 50 kV is 5·4 pm;
at 100 kV, 3·7 pm and at 1000 kV, 0·9 pm. 4
Recalling that the general relationship for resolving power in the light
microscope is that it varies as a direct function of the wavelength and as
an inverse function of the numerical aperture (eqn. 1), it is to be stressed
that the numerical aperture of an electron beam is exceedingly small. The
conical aperture angle of the beam at the electromagnetic lens amounts to
no more than 10- 3 to 10- 4 radians. This limiting angle is imposed by
several considerations, the most important of which are the angular
aberrational effects. Thus, chromatic aberration is directly proportional to
the aperture angle, and spherical aberration is proportional to the cube of
that angle. The angular openings, and correspondingly the beam diameter,
must therefore be limited by the use of diaphragms with small pinholes in
the electron microscope. Additional collimation of the electron beam is
provided by the Wehnelt, a small cylinder that surrounds the cathode
(tungsten filament) and is negative to the cathode. Playing the role of an
electrostatic lens, the Wehnelt concentrates the electrons emitted by the
cathode into a fine-pencilled beam.
It should be pointed out that although the small aperture angle of the
electron microscope increases the resolution, it also increases the depth of
focus, which is a function of the resolution divided by the aperture angle.
For the light microscope, this depth is only 0·2 pm at a magnification of
1000, but for the electron microscope at the same magnification, the depth
of focus could be from 2·5 pm to 50 pm, depending on the aperture angle
used. 5 This depth of focus is extremely necessary in SEM and is occasion-
ally quite useful also in TEM.
The velocity of the electrons depends on the difference in potential
between cathode and anode. Thus the kinetic energy of the incident
electrons, which determines the power of penetration and scattering of
electrons in the specimen, is in large part dependent on the accelerating
voltage. For biological materials a voltage of 60-80 kV is adequate for
present-day observations with TEM, and the transmitted beam will be
satisfactory both for activating a fluorescent screen and for reducing the
38 EXAMINATION AND ANALYSIS OF STARCH
2.2.1 Apparatus
There is a close resemblance between the physical structure of a trans-
mission electron microscope and the classical light microscope (Fig. 2.2):
each has a system of three lenses (condenser, objective and ocular) which
are arranged in superposed fashion in the optical axis of the apparatus.
Object
on grid
Objective
1-~r~==::L Aperture
Intermediote
lens
Window
k----::;!;;:===;;iI-- Scree n
Projector
lectrons /
~
bserver
Pump
The column in the former is usually much larger: often more than I m
high. Also, a vacuum is created in TEM, by the use of fore-pump and a
diffusion pump, amounting at least to 10- 5 mm Hg.
The formation of an image proceeds in a similar way. The light source
here is the 'electron gun', emitting the beam of electrons. This beam is
focused on the plane of the object by the condenser (C). The object absorbs
or scatters the incident electrons, and the transmitted beam is enlarged
several times by the succeeding lenses. These latter are the objective (0)
and then an ocular, composed of two lenses: the intermediate lens (LI),
of variable focus, permitting continuous magnification from 1 to 50
diameters, and the projector (P), of fixed magnification, which enlarges
the intermediate image to its final size by projection on a retractable
fluorescent screen or a photographic emulsion. The total magnification can
reach 100000 to 150000 diameters.
However, for a body to be seen with TEM, fine resolution and high
magnification are not sufficient. There must also be adequate contrast to
0ei eei
' ...
z+ e~
ei
e
~ ei
FIG. 2.3. Interaction of beam electrons (eJ -) with an atom: (a) elastic scattering;
(b) inelastic scattering; (c) no scattering. (ea - = atomic electron, Z + = atomic nucleus.)
40 EXAMINATION AND ANALYSIS OF STARCH
now tough enough so that sections may be put directly on a grid without a
supporting membrane.
Generally sections of the normal starch grain are devoid of identifiable
subunits, and it is necessary to bring about some sort of artificial differen-
tiation in the starch substance. Thus, more amorphous or looser regions
can be preferentially dissolved by acid hydrolysis 12 - 24 or by enzymatic
digestion 7.12.18.21.24-37 before the starch grain is embedded and
sectioned. Some workers have used amylase on the thin sections of the
starch grain as they lie on the grid. 7,32,38,39 Another approach to differen-
tiation is to disperse starch material, as by gelatinisation, 40- 42 placing a
droplet of the gelatinised suspension on the membrane of the grid.
Many efforts have been made to effect heavy atom staining in order to
achieve differentiation. Such efforts in recent years have been especially
fruitful, as they have been based on reactions with specific groups. It is
first of all worthy of note that the classic heavy atom fixatives of protein
materials have proved virtually useless in staining starch: OsO 4/ 2. 14 .43 - 47
glutaraldehyde plus OS04,31,48,49 OS04 + phosphotungstic acid,
uranium nitrate and chI oro platinic acid. 43 ,44,50,51 Potassium perman-
ganate also seems devoid of effect, except at pH 5 for a long time or with
lintnerised starch, 12,18,52,53 which indicates a reduction of the manganese
by the liberated aldehyde groups, with the probable formation of Mn0 2.
Similarly, reduction probably occurs when chromic acid is used. 17
Specific group reactions are those based on the use of periodic acid,
which yields a starch dialdehyde by oxidising the hydroxyl groups at C 2
and C 3. The dialdehyde can react with ammoniacal silver (pH 10-12) to
precipitate silver crystals. 21 ,24,54-56 This particular reaction has the
disadvantage of the treatments with chromic acid and potassium per-
manganate in that it produces large precipitates (i.e. larger than 10 nm).
However, if the starch dialdehyde is first reacted for a long time with
thiosemicarbazide (TSC) or thiocarbohydrazide (TCH) and then a silver
salt (silver nitrate or proteinate), the reaction is stoichiometric, with 1 atom
of silver fixed per molecule of TSC or TCH (Fig. 2.4). The reaction was
first studied chemically by Edel 57 in cellulose. Later Edel's process was
developed for TEM in starch by Gallant2 1,54,55 and in cellulose by
Kassenbeck and Hagege. 58 It was used in a similar way in glycogen and
animal mucopolysaccharides by Thiery. 59 It may be used for bulk material
before embedding 21 ,22,24,34,59-63 or on thin sections. 19 ,24,31,32,64 The
reaction does not occur with polysaccharides of {3,1-3 structure 65 but can
take place wherever 2,3-dialdehydes may be formed by periodic acid
treatment. In some conditions unsaturated lipids and amino acid terminal
42 EXAMINATION AND ANALYSIS OF STARCH
groups may react. 24,31 A quicker oxidation occurs with lead tetraacetate,
followed by potassium permanganate, and the stain seems more
intense. 22 ,24 Metal alcoholates are produced by reacting an alkali metal
with the hydroxyl groups of the starch. 19 ,24,59,66
FIG. 2.4. TEM view of com starch (x 26 400), lightly oxidised by periodic acid, then
treated with thiosemicarbazide and silver nitrate. The darker layers contain more
reduced silver.
oxidant, damaging both starch and the microscope parts. However lead
iodide has been used successfully to stain starch, and the stain may be
specific. 2 4,69
The surface of the starch grain can also be studied by TEM. Recourse
is had to the technique of replica formation by shadowing (Fig. 2.5), in
which a small amount of metal (Ag, Au, Cr, Pd, Pt, U) is evaporated at a
Broken storch
Formvor
I Gloss
+ C)
f'u
(Shodow U
U C
c
- * , S t o r c h / uc
~.,
I Formvor
(+ ethylene dich loride) 1 Grid
U C
• .Sto~h/UC
1+ 30% ,h"m;, ood I \ u 'G,;d
~~
""'"'o;.=-........... C -::: u C
Grid
FIG. 2.5. Process of preparing a typical replica by shadowing with uranium (U) and
carbon (C) and then digesting the original material.
small angle to the plane of the starch surface to form a very thin layer,
with reliefs. That is, for any protuberance, the metal is deposited more
heavily on the exposed side and more lightly on the side facing away. In
the microscope, differences in relative absorption and scattering of the
electron beam by the different thicknesses of metal deposit give the optical
effect of a surface being lighted from one side. The metal layer is usually
reinforced by another, evaporated layer of carbon, silicon, germanium or
silica. Any thickness of starch substance can be used because the starch is
removed by digestion after the shadowing operation. 70, 72 Sometimes a
44 EXAMINATION AND ANALYSIS OF STARCH
Q)
>
u
Q)
E
0 1'-----"
2.3.1 Apparatus
Like the microscope for TEM, that for SEM is composed of a column,
an electron gun and a focusing system of lenses for the primary electron
beam (Fig. 2.6). There is, in addition, a scanning device by which the very
fine primary electron beam ('probe') is caused to make successive sweeps
e., :""1
! :':""'-Electron probe
.j
Reflected electrons :"J Secondary electrons
detector detector
--
1;>-;) Sample
Electromotive force
0'
measurement Electrons absorbed
by sample
Transmitted electrons
detector
FIG. 2.7. Possibilities of analysis with SEM (after Kimoto and Russ S1 ).
( a) (b) I :
II
Scintilla tor
Det ecto r
E
::t.
Sample
Hol der
FIG. 2.S. Formation of image with secondary electrons (e;) and reflected primary
electrons (er -) in SEM. Beam in (a) is of low energy; beam in (b) is of high energy
(after Kimoto and Russ 81 and Philibert 82 ).
tT1
~
:>
s::
~
oz
~
~
><:
~
v.>
o'>"l
~:;tI
n
::t::
(a) (b)
FIG. 2.9. (a) SEM view of native normal maize starch (x 18(0). (b) SEM view of native amylomaize starch ( x 2880).
tl1
r
tl1
(")
...,
:;>:I
o
z
~
n
~
til
(")
~
><:
o.."
til
~
:;>:I
(")
II:
>
S
~
::c
(")
II:
"d
:;>:I
§
c::
(")
...,
til
(c) (d)
FIG . 2.9. (c) SEM view of native waxy maize starch ( x 1800). (d) SEM view of native rice starch (x2880). ,l::..
1.0
( d) VI
o
\, I
,l'
~
...,~
oz
~
"(b)
~
E
til
o
"l
en
~
~
(")
::t:
(a)
FIG. 2.10. SEM views of development of the native starch grain of wheat (after Evers 95 ). Scales illustrated: (a)-(d) 1 pm; (e) 2 pm;
(f) 5 pm.
(a)
(b)
FIG.2.11. SEM view of native wheat starch during digestion by pancreatic juice of hog:
(a) x 3740; (b) x 4680.
Vl
N
tTl
~
~
~
o
Z
~
~
~
'"
o>rj
;!'"
::c
g
(a) (b)
FIG. 2.12. (a) SEM view of potato starch sonicated in air (x 5810). (b) SEM view of native manioc starch (x 3360).
(c) (d)
FIG. 2.12. (c) and (d). SEM view of native manioc starch during digestion by pancreatic juice of hog ( x 8(00).
54 EXAMINATION AND ANALYSIS OF STARCH
more general reactions, such as that of the lead salts. It has been
supposed122 that lead, as plumbite ion, forms hydrogen bonds with the
substrate. This would clearly be a non-specific kind of staining, regardless
of the minute and circumspect details suggested for its employment.
However, new techniques of staining permit the localisation of the cellular
polysaccharides and the tracing of the course of their biosynthesis and
growth in relation to other structures of the cell. 14 ,24,48,121
An elegant application of specific reagents in TEM concerns the
identification of the nature of the starch in parenchyma cells and in sieve
tubes of the bean. 29 The starch grains were stained with uranyl nitrate and
lead citrate after digestion of the ultrathin sections with bacterial a.-
amylase and with pullulanase. It could thus be shown that there was an
abundance of glycogen-like a.,1-6 branching in the sieve tube starch,
which differed from the more typical starch in the parenchyma cells.
REFERENCES
1. Wood, R. W., Physical Optics, Dover, New York, 1961.
2. Siegel, B. M., Modern Developments in Electron Microscopy, Academic Press,
New York, 1964.
ELECTRON MICROSCOPY OF STARCH AND STARCH PRODUCTS 57
3. de Broglie, L., Recherches sur la tMorie des quanta (These de Doctorat), Masson et
Cie, Paris, 1924 (reeditee en 1963).
4. Ruska, E., Naturwiss. Rundschau, 1964, 17, 125.
5. Reimer, L., Elektronenrnikroskopische Untersuchungs- und Praparationsrnethoden,
Springer, Berlin, 1967.
6. Hayat, M. A., Principles and Techniques of Electron Microscopy: Biological
Applications, Vol. J, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1970.
7. Kellenberger, E., Settele, W. and Ryter, A., Etude de coupes minces de grains
d'amidon, Proc. First Int. Con! Electr. Micr. (London, 15-21 July 1954), personal
communication, not published.
8. Whistler, R. L. and Turner, E. S., J. Polymer Science, 1955, 18, 153.
9. Whistler, R. L. and Thornburg, W. L., J. Agr. Food Chern., 1957,5,203.
10. Whistler, R. L., Spenser, W. W., Goatley, J. L. and Nikuni, Z., Cereal Chemistry,
1958,35, 331.
11. Miihlethaler, K., Die Starke, 1965, 17, 245.
12. Buttrose, M. S., J. Ultrastr. Res., 1960,4,231.
13. Buttrose, M. S., J. Cell Bioi., 1962, 14, 159; Die Starke, 1963, 15, 213.
14. Buttrose, M. S., Austral. J. Bioi. Sci., 1962, 16, 305.
15. Buttrose, M. S., Die Starke, 1963, 15, 85.
16. Frey-Wyssling, A. and Buttrose, M. S., Makrornol. Chernie, 1961,44 (6),173.
17. Hi:ilzl, J. and Bancher, E., Qual. Plant. Mater. Veg., 1965, 12, 96.
18. Innamorati, M., Caryologia, 1966, 19, 343.
19. Gallant, D., Crozet, N. and Guilbot, A., J. Microscopie, 1967,6, 53a.
20. Mussulman, W. C. and Wagoner, J. A., Cereal Chern., 1968,45, 162.
21. Gallant, D. and Guilbot, A., Die Starke, 1969, 21, 156.
22. Gallant, D. and Guilbot, A., Proc. 7th Int. Congr. Electr. Micr., (Grenoble,
Sept. 1970), 583.
23. Hi:ilzl, J., Die Starke, 1973, 25, 292.
24. Gallant, D., These de Doctorat d'Etat es Sciences Physiques, Paris, 1974.
Enregistrement CNRS No. AO 10823.
25. Aranyi, C. and Hawrylewicz, E. J., Cereal Chern., 1968, 45, 500.
26. Aranyi, C. and Hawrylewicz, E. J., Cereal Science Today, 1969, 14, 230.
27. Miihlethaler, K., Z. Wiss. Mikr., 1955, 62, 394.
28. Badenhuizen, N. P., Protoplasrna, 1966, 62, 306.
29. Palewitz, B. A. and Newcomb, E. H., J. Cell Bioi., 1970, 45, 383.
30. Derrien, A., Gallant, D., Aumaitre, A. and Guilbot, A., Cereal Science Today,
1971, 16,292.
31. Gallant, D. and Nougarede, A., C. R. Acad. Sci. (Paris), 1972, D275, 1499.
32. Nougarede, A. and Gallant, D., C. R. Acad. Sci. (Paris), 1972, D275, 1605.
33. Dronzek, B. L., Hwang, P. and Bushuk, W., Cereal Chern., 1972,49,232.
34. Gallant, D., Derrien, A., Aumaitre, A. and Guilbot, A., Die Starke, 1973,25, 56.
35. Shetty, R. M., Lineback, D. R. and Seib, P. A., Cereal Chern., 1974, 51, 364.
36. Bean, M. M., Keagy, P. M., Fullington, J. G., Jones, F. T. and Mecham, D. K.,
Cereal Chern., 1974,51,416.
37. Davis, A. B. and Harbers, L. H., J. Anirn. Sci., 1974, 38, 900.
38. Nikuni, Z. and Whistler, R. L., J. Biochern., 1957,44,227.
39. Nikuni, Z. and Hizukuri, S., Mern. Inst. Sci. Ind. Res., Osaka Univ., 1957, 14,173.
40. Frey-Wyssling, A., Experientia, 1952, 8, 101.
41. Guilbot, A. and Levavasseur, G., C. R. A cad. Sci. (Paris), 1954,239, 728.
42. Donnet, J. B., Medemblik, L. and Jaeger-Messiet, J., Bull.Soc. Chirn., France,
1967,2117.
43. Obolensky, G., Annali di Botanica, 1958,26, 1.
44. Obolensky, G., Mikroskopie, 1959, 14, 189.
58 EXAMINATION AND ANALYSIS OF STARCH
45. Crozet, N., Gallant, D., Godon, B., Guilbot, A. and Petit, L., Ind. Agr. Alirn.,
1966,83, 559.
46. Chandorkar, K. R. and Badenhuizen, N. P., Cereal Chern., 1967,44,27.
47. Salema, R. and Badenhuizen, N. P., J. Ultrastr. Res., 1967,20, 383.
48. Badenhuizen, N. P., The Biogenesis 0/ Starch Granules in Higher Plmzts, Appleton-
Century-Crofts, New York, 1969.
49. Ohad, I., Friedberg, I., Ne'eman, Z. and Schramm, M., Plant Physiol., 1971, 47,
465.
50. Innamorati, M., Giorn. Bot. Ital., 1963,70, 445.
51. Innamorati, M., Caryologia, 1963, 16, 159.
52. Mollenhauer, H. H., J. Biophys. Biochern. Cytol., 1959, 6, 431.
53. Jenkins, L. D., Loney, D. P. and Meredith, P., Cereal Chern., 1974,51, 718.
54. Gallant, D. and Crozet, N., J. Microscopie, 1966,5, 51a.
55. Gallant, D., Crozet, N. and Guilbot, A., ibid., 1966,5, 52a.
56. Gallant, D. and Guilbot, A., ibid., 1969, 8, 549.
57. Edel, G., These d'Ingenieur ESCIL, No. 141, Lyon, France, 1962.
58. Kassenbeck, P. and Hagege, R., Textile Res. J., 1968,38, 196.
59. Thiery, J.-P., J. Microscopie, 1967, 6, 987.
60. Gallant, D. and Guilbot, A., Die Starke, 1971,23,244.
61. Gallant, D., Derrien, A. and Guilbot, A., J. Microscopie, 1971, 11, 60.
62. Gallant, D., Mercier, C. and Guilbot, A., Cereal Chern., 1972, 49, 354.
63. Gallant, D. and Guilbot, A., Die Starke, 1973,25, 335.
64. Rougier, M., Vian, B., Gallant, D. and Roland, J. C., L'Annt?e Biologique, 1973,
12,44.
65. Schrevel, J., J. Microscopie, 1970, 9, 593.
66. Hagege, R., ibid., 1967,6, 60a.
67. Nieuwdorp, P. J. and Buys, M. C., Acta Bot. Neerl., 1964,13,559.
68. Reynolds, J., J. Cell Biology, 1963, 17,210.
69. Flood, R., Proc. 7th Int. Congr. 0/ Electr. Micr. (Grenoble, Sept. 1970),431.
70. Hess, K. and Mahl, H., Mikroskopie, 1954, 9, 81.
71. Hess, K., Mahl, H., Glitter, E. and Dodt, E., Mikroskopie, 1955, 10, 6.
72. Hess, K., Mahl, H. and Giitter, E., ibid., 1955, 10, 329.
73. Whistler, R. L., Byrd, J. D. and Thornburg, W. L., Bioch. Biophys. Acta, 1955, 18,
146.
74. Thomson, T. R. and Petite, D., Cereal Chern., 1967,44, 105.
75. Sterling, C. and Spit, B. J., J. Exp. Bot., 1957, 9, 75.
76. Sterling, C. and Pangborn, J., Arn. J. Bot., 1960, 47, 577.
77. Branton, D. and Palk, R. B., J. Ultrastr. Res., 1967, 19,283.
78. Leonard, R. and Sterling, c., J. Ultrastr. Res., 1972,39, 85.
79. Barlow, K. K., Buttrose, M. S., Simmonds, D. H. and Vesk, M., Cereal Chern.,
1973, 50, 443.
80. Azolla, F. K., Die Starke, 1972,24, 150.
81. Kimoto, S. and Russ, J. c., Arner. Sci., 1969, 57, 112.
82. Philibert, J., J. Microscopie, 1967, 6, 889.
83. Sterling, c., Die Starke, 1971,23, 193.
84. Gallant, D., Degrois, M., Sterling, C. and Guilbot, A., ibid., 1972,24, 116.
85. Bathgate, G. N. and Palmer, G. H., ibid., 1972,24, 336.
86. Headley, V. E., Stanheimer, J., Freeman, J. E. and Heady, R. E., Cereal Chern.,
1972,49, 142.
87. Pomerantz, Y., ibid., 1974,51, 545.
88. Rohrlich, M. and Miiller, V., Die Starke, 1969, 21, 29.
89. Robutti, J. L., Hoseney, R. C. and Wassom, C. E., Cereal Chern., 1974, 51, 173.
90. Hoseney, R. C., Davis, A. B. and Harbers, L. H., ibid., 1974, 51, 552.
ELECTRON MICROSCOPY OF STARCH AND STARCH PRODUCTS 59
INTRODUCTION
starch than in maize starch. Starches with very small grains such as rice
starch are almost free-flowing and have less crunch.
(4)
viz the diameter, y, of the slit should be measured in the particle diameter
D.
In this way the rheology of starch suspensions fits into the laws of
turbulent flow of liquids.
3.2.2 Dilatancy
Concentrated starch suspensions show the phenomenon of dilatancy. 4
Starch milks of 40 %dry matter (24 0 Be) or over are difficult to pump and
they flow irregularly even at small velocities. In smooth-walled pipes the
movement has a tendency to proceed with uniform velocity except for a
thin friction layer next to the wall. 5 The inner part moves as a cylinder of
solid material. On passing a nozzle such a flow tends to be broken up in
alternating pieces of semi-solid and more dilute suspension, giving a
varying profile on leaving an orifice. If in such a case a pressure can build
up (e.g. when a constant volume of suspension is brought into motion),
the flow will almost surely stop altogether.
In pressure-velocity studies of concentrated milks (from 34 %solids on)
an unusual relation is found. At very low pressure the velocity of move-
ment is roughly proportional to the pressure. At increased pressure the
velocity-pressure relation diminishes, and in some special cases a region
will be found where the velocity is almost independent of pressure.
However in most such cases after a further increase of pressure the flow
stops entirely.
In its most extreme form this dilatancy was well known in the starch
factories at the time when settling of the starch was done on tables or in
vats, followed by hand-discharge. Manipulation of a spade in the semi-
solid mass on the table was quite an art. The workers made a solid by the
66 EXAMINATION AND ANALYSIS OF STARCH
o 33·5 1·099
25 29·5 1·029
45 26·2 0·973
rheological methods, and to literature from 1965 on. In view of what has
been said about the complex nature of the pasting process it will be clear
that a thorough study is possible only when the heating is performed under
rigid standardisation of all factors concerned and with continuous record-
ing of the rapidly changing consistency.
A series of instruments has been designed to meet these requirements,
of which the Corn Industries Recording ViscometerlO.ll.12 and the
VI-Viscograph 13 were especially adapted to concentrated pastes of potato
starch and the Brabender Amylograph 8 to flour. Attention should be
drawn to the fact, that in principle the apparatus have all been developed
between 1938 and 1950 and that all later modifications have been on the
same general lines. For a more thorough comparison of the relative
merits of these instruments, see Reference 14.
For starch the only instrument now available is the Brabender Visco-
graph. 9 It works on the following principle (Fig. 3.1). A mixture of starch
and water is put into a beaker provided with a set of vertical pins. It is
coupled to a synchronous drive, which turns it around a vertical axis,
and a stirrer is put in also consisting of a set of vertical pins. The mixture
is heated by a set of heating spirals cylindrically arranged around the
FIG. 3.1. Measuring bowl and sensor for the Brabender Viscograph. (Courtesy
Brabender OHG, Duisburg.)
THE RHEOLOGY OF STARCH 69
>-
u
c
.!'!
<f)
<f)
c
o
U
Time
FIG . 3.2
the curve the main diameter is high, up to 3-4 times that of the unswollen
grain. In potato starch this amounts to an average diameter of over 10011,
and a maximum value of over 300 11. The factor dUjdy' in formula (4) is
high and therefore stirring resistance is high. The big grains however are
immediately broken, the factor dUjdy' goes down and the stirring resist-
ance diminishes proportionally. In many cases this change suffices for the
explanation of the diminishing torque independent of starch in solution.
For industrial users of starch the general shape of the viscogram has
proved to be of value, not only for the prediction of the cooking process.
Several groups of users have tried to correlate their results with the graphs
and have found certain relationships to hold. A high peak indicates the
ease with which the granules are disintegrated, an important property in
the use of potato starch on fibres, e.g. in the adhesive, paper and textile
industries. A prolonged period of high consistency is appreciated in the
food industry (see cross linked starches) in cases where the swollen starch
must be left as fully intact as possible.
In other applications the main requirement is a rapid breakdown to a
solution of very low consistency, which is indicated in the graph by a return
to the zero line of the scale. So for the regular user, the viscograph makes
possible a rapid judgement of any sample submitted by the manufacturers.
On the other hand we urge caution against an easy interpretation of the
visco graph curve in terms of industrial use. In many applications of
starch (e.g. paper, textiles), the flow of the paste must be regulated on two
completely different levels. On the one hand the user is interested in the
flow in pumps and through pipelines, or in the orifices of his equipment.
On the other hand there is the flow between fibres, or in the pores of other
materials, for which the starch paste is used as a binder. In the latter case
there are opposing requirements. In some applications the starchy material
must be able to pass into the pores, in other cases such as textile and paper
finishing the main part (or at least a certain fraction) should not go
through.
With macro-rheological methods there are two chances of error. In the
first place the pastes in the instruments are intensively stirred and particles
could be much more distorted than in industrial application. In the second
place a consistency measurement is a crude, overall yardstick for the
complex properties of the paste. The same high consistency can be found
with relatively large remnants of the starch granule structure dispersed in
a thin liquid as with few smaller parts in a medium of high viscosity.
We therefore urge the reader always to combine the examination by
viscograph with the microscopic methods described in Starch Production
72 EXAMINATION AND ANALYSIS OF STARCH
>-
u
C
<Il
~ 50
If)
c
o
<..)
o
Time (min)
FIG. 3.3.
The other starches differ from potato starch and also among themselves
on two points. The maximum consistency differs, and the curve leaves the
zero line after different times, viz at a different temperature.
In the concentration region up to 10 %of the cereal starches swell much
less than potato or cassava starch. Hence the granules stay more rigid and
are embedded in more fluid, so that less granule breakage occurs during
cooking. Accordingly the paste is built up primarily from entire granules
THE RHEOLOGY OF STARCH 73
100
;>,
u
c
Q)
V>
V> 50
c
0
U
O~~--~----~-----L-----L----~-- __
25
Time (min)
FIG. 3.4.
100
>-
u
.,c:
.,., 50
c:
o
u
a
Time (min)
FIG. 3.5.
formula (6) by which method a and K truly represent the properties of the
paste.
On warm, well stirred pastes the value of the factor a do not deviate
much from 0·5, so that in practical applications one measurement would
suffice to establish K. In this way the flow of paste through apparatus,
pumps, pipe lines can be predicted.
However for the application of such pastes more information must be
known than K alone. Even in potato starch pastes it is very difficult to
destroy the last traces of micellar organisation. In industrial practice this
is almost never realised. 42 The fact that a is always so far from unity is
also significant. It tends to confirm the thesis of Klausner 43 that pseudo-
plastic flow itself is an indication of the presence of at least two phases.
'"
::>
~ 1600
(?
FIG. 3.6.
The action of flow during practical application can cause separation of the
phases, so that it is not always certain that the paste will behave as a
liquid.
In this connection some comment should be made on the usual ways of
preparing starch pastes for industrial applications and its influence on
rheology. The paste should be stirred thoroughly in the process. The
influence of such a treatment can be seen in Fig. 3.6. 11 In this case stirring
causes a 30 %extra consistency loss. In the somewhat old fashioned open
steam method a similar result is obtained. The starch granule after swelling
is locally subjected to heavy vibrations caused by the collapse of steam
bubbles below 100°C and broken into pieces.
78 EXAMINATION AND ANALYSIS OF STARCH
So much has been written on the subject of gel formation that a complete
survey seems to be almost impossible. For a review from the structural
point of view we refer to Chapter 3 of Starch Production Technology and
to Rees 45 and, for a more rheological treatment of gel properties, to
Hermans. 46 On cooling the more or less pseudoplastic starch paste
develops a structure by retrogradation (see Starch Production Technology,
Chapter 7). Not only is there an increase in the K of formula (6), com-
parable to the increasing viscosity in a cooling Newtonian liquid but there
is also a change in character of the flow taking place. A certain rigidity
develops in the system which also has a reversible component showing
elastic behaviour and reacting against stress, which component is for an
important part of an elastic nature.
The main problem at this stage is the structure of the paste. In many
cases the warm paste still contains a significant volume of granule frag-
ments, so that after cooling and in the course of several hours a volume of
elastic particles will be formed. Around them a starch solution is able to
retrograde giving a gel. Are the fragments glued together by this second
process, or is the elasticity mainly that of the fragments?
As an illustration of the problem we suggest the following model. A
vessel is filled with a number of dry rubber balls, each having its own
elasticity, but no force is needed to separate it from its neighbours. On the
balls is placed a lid somewhat smaller than the opening of the vessel, but
with a margin so small that no ball can escape. On putting pressure on the
lid the vessel and its contents react elastically. The same vessel and the
same balls are used again, but now the balls are glued together, layer by
layer. In this situation quite a force is needed to separate the balls. How-
ever the reaction to pressure on the lid remains about the same. Which of
those two situations is that of the cold paste?
For an answer to this question Hamer 47 immerses Saareplates (provided
with vertical stems) in a cooling corn starch paste. After cooling to room
temperature-and keeping it cool for some time-he applies vertical loads
to the plates via the stems. Under these conditions even very small loads
give a slow but sustained movement, whose velocity is dependent on the
load. No yield value is found. However it is known that in corn starch
paste the interstitial liquid is not very concentrated. A well-stirred and
heated potato starch would be a better object for such a study because so
much more starch has gone into solution. The experiment was therefore
repeated by de Willigen 48 in an 8 %potato starch paste, heated for 48 min
THE RHEOLOGY OF STARCH 79
C, '
Cree
A I P recovery
C 2 :- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0
,
O ~____________~
C3~'____________________~E~___
~ ~ ~
Time
FIG. 3.7.
80 EXAMINATION AND ANALYSIS OF STARCH
exude some of the water absorbed on pasting during the cooling period.
In more advanced states of pasting a rigid gel with high elasticity will be
formed, evidently consisting of swollen starch grains. In potato starch, in
particular, but also in other starches, a continuation of heating and stirring
of the warm paste correlates with decreasing firmness and strength of
the cold paste. Cooked pastes of potato starch have, as a rule, passed the
optimal state of swelling, so that gel firmness and strength are less than the
maximal. Such pastes have a 'long' structure, viz on cutting with a spoon
no sharp cutting surface is obtained and a thread of jelly drags behind.
Also the gel tends to flow from the spoon.
High mechanical shear of the warm paste causes a reduction in gel
strength. Whittenberger 51 submitted an 8 % paste at 75°C to high
shear and succeeded in obtaining a product which did not gel on cooling.
The properties of the gels are highly dependent on starch concentration.
In maize starch milk puddings, Rutgers,60 found a rapid increase of gel
strength around 4 % starch. For example the time for the solution to flow
through a mobilometer increases tenfold when the concentration is
increased from 3·6 to 4·4 % starch.
The present day multiplicity of starch derivatives further complicates the
picture since a number of methods are available for the modification of the
gel formation in a paste. On one hand there is the cross linked series of
derivatives, which give a paste with swollen, but not broken granules
especially suited for gel formation. On the other hand retrogradation can
be hampered, or completely prevented, by esterification (e.g. acetylation,
phosphorylation), or etherification (e.g. with propylene oxide).52 Com-
binations of both methods of substitution are in use.
In such a combination of cross linking and esterification of potato starch
or waxy maize starch it is possible to obtain a clear gel, with low gel
strength, short texture and a high granule stability especially suitable for
use in frozen foods. For opaque gels equivalent derivatives are made from
grain starches,52 but as a rule these derivatives have a somewhat higher
gel strength.
Certain additions to the aqueous phase hamper the swelling and break-
age of the starch granules on cooking and exert an influence on the gel
properties of the cooked paste. This is especially the case with sugar in
concentrations of 10% and over. 51 A potato starch saturated with Ca-ions
will give a firmer gel than the corresponding K starch, and the Ca-starch
gel is the shorter. 48 A further complication with these systems is the
influence of the grain diameter or, in more thoroughly cooked and stirred
pastes, of the mean diameter of the fragments. Attention should be drawn
82 EXAMINATION AND ANALYSIS OF STARCH
It has been shown above that the cooking of a starch paste is a process
depending on many variables. Considerable experience is needed to make
up a paste to a definite specification with regard to particle diameter and
overall consistency. Around 1930 there were already derivatives on the
market in a pre-cooked form and the first extensive application was a
powder for making a wall-paper adhesive by mixing with cold water.
The advantage of such preparations for the user of small quantities lies
in the easy reproducibility of the 'reconstituting' process. In the factory,
the pasting is carried out on an industrial scale under rigorously standard-
ised conditions to produce a paste of top quality which the small consumer
cannot achieve and large amounts of these preparations are marketed, as
adhesives, for paper making, textile sizing and many other applications.
In their rheological behaviour this kind of preparation has a dual
particle structure. In the first place there is the structure as in any warm
paste, containing smaller or larger fragments of starch granules. The paste
with this structure is dried, mostly on rotary drum dryers. 53 The layer is
scraped off, milled and sieved. These particles form the second structure
with particle diameters well above that of original grains. These fragments
undergo retrogradation, with a partial reversion to the structure of the
original grain. However in these products water absorption in the cold is
high in comparison with the natural starch.
During reconstitution the most simple dried starch paste swells, takes up
water, but does not disintegrate and the starch molecules do not readily
go into solution. The paste formed is a short one consisting of swollen
layer particles without much coherence. In the early days the users of dry
wall-paper adhesive complained that the paste was much 'shorter' than the
freshly cooked flour pastes they were accustomed to. This was corrected
by the addition of alkali or salts. 54
Now, after about 40 years of industrial practice such complaints are
eliminated by the use of esters and ethers instead of simple starches, and
THE RHEOLOGY OF STARCH 83
These derivatives are made for the explicit purpose of making a Newtonian,
or almost Newtonian, solution of a much higher concentration than would
be possible with native starch. For this purpose the structure of the starch
granule must be destroyed, either immediately after pasting or at a some-
what higher temperature.
The classic example is the Lintner starch. This is prepared by treating
starch in a cold 2N hydrochloric acid. The degree of scission of the starch
molecules, catalysed by the hydrogen ion, can be regulated by the time of
treatment, e.g. some days or weeks. After this immersion up to 25 % of the
starch has dissolved in the acid, mostly in the form of smaller oligo-
saccharides, e.g. DP 20 or less. The residual powder still shows the starch
structure, but after neutralisation it is readily soluble in hot water, giving
a clear Newtonian solution. A concentration of up to 30% is possible (a
30 % paste of potato starch, if possible to make, is a stiff mass).
Practical methods of scission are by acid (cold or warm), by enzymatic
hydrolysis and by oxidation, mostly with sodium hypochlorite, 5 6 at pH
8-9. The choice of method depends on the kind of starch and the purpose
in application. Solutions are Newtonian, or nearly so, and concentrations
can be very high. Such solutions are almost free of structure and are,
therefore, able to penetrate fibres, e.g. paper, textiles and can act as a glue.
On cooling, a structure is formed by retrogradation. The rheological
change in a paste of enzymatically hydrolysed starch has been measured by
Schutz 5 5 (Fig. 3.8). The stress-strain relation at different holding times is
given as that of a pseudoplastic fluid, without yield value, and is described
by formulae which are in principle similar to formula (6). However the
exponent a, almost unity immediately after cooking, goes down regularly
until after 80 min it is about 0'5, viz a value is obtained about similar to
that of a well-stirred cooked potato starch paste. Also in this case no sign
of a coherent network structure is found.
The velocity of retrogradation and its effect on liquid rheology is
dependent on the degree of scission (see R. Collison 66). However a some-
what more severe treatment causes a decline in retrogradation. In the
manufacture of these products there is a possibility of making a product
84 EXAMINATION AND ANALYSIS OF STARCH
with extra heavy retrogradation as well as one which does not crystallise at
all on cooling.
Newer research on oxidation of starch has proved the possibility of
making products with more carboxyl groups and less hydrolysis than
before. Such derivatives give more viscous solutions and retrogradation is
hampered or completely prevented by the carboxyl groups.
In all these cases the warm solutions show no abnormalities and their
viscosity can be measured in absolute units in any suitable viscometer.
log 0
FIG. 3.8.
REFERENCES
1. Bagnold, R. A., The Physics 0/ Blown Sand and Desert Dunes, Methuen, London,
1954.
2. PrandtI, L., Z. Ver. Deut. Ing., 1933, 77, 105; see also 1, and Townsend, A. A.,
The Structure o/Turbulent Shear Flow, Cambridge Univ. Press, London, 1956.
3. Bagnold, R. A., Proc. Roy. Soc. (London), 1954, A225, 49.
4. Roscoe, R., in Flow Properties 0/ Disperse Systems (by J. J. Hermans), North-
Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 1953.
5. Karnis, A., Goldsmith, H. L. and Mason, S. E., J. Colloid Inter! Sci., 1966,22,531.
6. de Willigen, A. H. A. and de Groot, P. W., Die Starke, 1967,19,368.
7. de Willigen, A. H. A., Die Starke, 1951,3,75.
8. Anker, C. A. and Geddes, W. F., Cereal Chem., 1944, 335.
9. Pagenstedt, B., Die Starke, 1951,3,202.
10. Kesler, C. C. and Bechtel, W. G., Ind. Eng. Chem., 1947, 19, 16.
11. de Willigen, A. H. A., Analytical Chemistry, 1953,25, 314.
12. de Willigen, A. H. A., Die Starke, 1953, 5, 36.
13. Selling, H. J. and van Lamoen, F. L. J., Chem. Weekblad, 1947,43, 602.
14. Scott Blair, G. W., Foodstuffs, Their Plasticity, Fluidity and Consistency, North-
Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 1953.
15. Brimhall, B. and Hixon, R. M., Ind. Eng. Chem. (Anal. Ed.), 1941, 13, 193.
16. Gallay, W., Can. J. Research, 1936, 14,360, 391,409.
17. Leach, H. W., Cereal Chemistry, 1963,40,593.
18. Hofstee, J., Chem. Weekblad, 1950,46, 515.
19. Hofstee, J., Die Starke, 1962, 14, 318.
20. Schoch, T. J., Cereal Chem., 1957, 34, 141.
21. Bechtel, W. G., Cereal Chem., 1947,24,200.
22. Bechtel, W. G. and Fischer, E. K., J. Coli. Chem., 1949,4,265.
23. de Willigen, A. H. A., Hofstee, J. and de Groot, P. W., Chem. Weekblad, 1948,44,
422.
Hofstee, J., Die Starke, 1953,4, 83.
24. Veselovskii, I. A., Am. Potato J., 1940, 17, 330.
25. de Willigen, A. H. A., Die Starke, 1951,3, 147.
26. de Willigen, A. H. A., Die Starke, 1952,4,213.
27. de Willigen, A. H. A., Proc. 0/ 9th Congresso Internazionale Industrie Agrarie,
Rome, 1952, c.s. al T.P. 1.
28. de Willigen, A. H. A., Vestnik slovenskega kemijskega drustva, 1954, I, 131.
29. Goerlitz, H., Z. Landwirtsch. Versuchs-Untersuchungsw., 1960,7, 121.
30. Ganz, A. J., Cereal Chem., 1965,42,431.
31. de Willigen, A. H. A., Kort Bericht no 28 van het Proe/station voor Aardappel-
verwerking, Groningen, 1950.
32. de Willigen, A. H. A., Chemisch Weekblad, 1947,43, 153.
33. Wiegel, E., Kolloid Z., 1933,62, 310.
34. Parlov, A., Germ. Pat. 629,798, 11 Mar. 1931.
86 EXAMINATION AND ANALYSIS OF STARCH
ADDITIONAL REFERENCES
Other references:
Ansart, M., Ind. Aliment. Agric. (Paris), 1962, 79, 821; Die Starke, 1955, 7, 136. (Test
methods for starches.)
Bean, M. L., Food Research, 1959,24,665. (Effect of 10 different sugars on the hot-paste
viscosity curves and gel of 5% corn starch paste.)
BeIche, J. R., Tappi, 1957,40,94. (Urea will lower the viscosity and retard the gelation
of modified starches but not of unmodified.)
Blinc, M., Die Starke, 1970,22,181. (Waxy corn starch and high amylose starch modified
by the influence of temperature.)
Bock, W. et al., Die Starke, 1967, 19, 87. (Investigations on starch gels using the
ridgelimeter.)
Brimhall, B. and Hixon, R. M., Cereal Chem., 1942, 19, 425. (Interpretation of starch
pastes.)
Chichester, C. O. and Sterling, C., Cereal Chem., 1957, 34, 233. (Stress relaxation in
starch gels.)
Chikubu, S., Chem. Abstr., 1960, 54, 10357. (Viscosity of non-glutinuous rice starch
pastes in the Brabender amylograph.)
De, H. N. et al., Pakistan J. Sci. Ind. Res., 1966, 9, 239. (Starch granule diameter
positively correlated with tuber diameter.)
Daum, U. and Benninga, H., Tappi, 1970,53, 1710. (Interaction between clay and starch
in paper coating colours, rheology of mixture.)
Djakovic, L. and Dokic, P., Die Starke, 1972,24, 195. (Rheological characterisation of
starch gels.)
Erdi, N. Z., et al., J. Colloid Interface Sci., 1965, 28, 36. (Rheological correlated with
particle diameter.)
Farrow, F. D. et al., J. Text. Inst., 1923, 14,414; 1928,19, 18. (The flow of starch paste
through a capillary.)
Fetzer, W. R. and Kirst, L. c., Cereal Chem., 1959, 36, 108. (The estimation of starch
paste fluidities.)
Goering, K. J., Cereal Chem., 1970,47, 592. (Cooking viscosity curves of barley starch.)
Ghose, V., Chem. Abstr., 1956,50, 7435i. (Viscous properties of starch pastes in alkaline
media.)
Goto, F., Die Starke, 1969, 21, 128. (Studies in the Brabender Plastograph.)
Goto, F., Die Starke, 1972, 21, 267. (Gelatinisation properties of highly concentrated
starch suspension by Brabender plastograph.)
Gupta, S. L., Indian J. Chem., 1970, 8, 536. (Influence of certain modifications of starch
on its sorption of water.)
Hersiczky, A., Die Starke, 1965, 17, 1. (Effect of the concentration of the starch paste on
the accuracy of Hoppler viscosity measurements.)
Higginbotham, R. S., Shirley Institute Memoirs, 1946,20, 1. (The flow of starch pastes.)
Hollo, J., Nahrung, 1959,3, 617, 877, 1051. (Studies on paste formation in starch.)
Hollo, J., Nahrung, 1961,5, 506. (Paste formation in heat-treated potato starch.)
Honsch, W. M., Die Starke, 1956, 8, 277. (Brabender diagrams of modified wheat
starches.)
Hsieh, P. T., Chemistry (Tapei), 1961, 231. (Viscosity of cassave and sweet potato
starches.)
88 EXAMINATION AND ANALYSIS OF STARCH
van Hallie, T. B., Bijdrage tot de kennis der verstijfseling en retrogradatie van zetmeel
door middel van de Rontgenspectrografie, Diss, Amsterdam, 1930.
Kawakami, K., Chern. Abstr., 1959, 53, 22601. (Brabender viscosity of gelatinised
starches.)
Kawamura, Y., Chern. Abstr., 1962,57,2479. (Viscosity curves of wheat starch pastes.)
Kihara, Y., Chern. Abstr., 1965, 62, 12006. (Viscosity of starches in rheometer UR-1.)
Kite, F. E., Die Starke, 1963, 15, 131. (Functional properties of food starches.)
Kite, F. E., Bakers Dig., 1957,21,42. (Properties of thick-boiling starches.)
Knyaginichev, M. I., Kolloid Zhur., 1956, 18, 38. (Viscosity of gelatinised potato starch
not reproducible. Reproducible value was obtained by treating with N NaOH at
room temperature.)
Koehler, R., Die Starke, 1963, 15, 56. (Basic concepts in rheology.)
Kopriva, B., Chern. Abstr., 1965, 63, 15083. (Sizes prepared from potato starch show
light thixotropy.)
Kopriva, B., Listy Cvkrovar., 1963,79, 141,224; 1963,80, 156. (Determination using a
Hoeppler viscometer.)
Kornienkoy, P. A. and Pvgin, T. S., Porosch. Met., 1968, 8, 101. (The physicochem.
state of starch paste changed continuously with time.)
Kovalevskaya, E. E. and Kurilenko, O. D., Chern. Abstr., 1965,62,5428. (Rheological
properties of starch pastes with admixtures.)
Kretovich, V. L. et al., Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1970, 190, 1480. (Effect of heavy water
on the viscosity of starch solutions.)
Kurilenko, O. D., Chern. Abstr., 1961,55, 16842. (The rheological properties of solutions
of starch paste, amylose and amylopectin.)
Kuwajima, S., Chern. Abstr., 1958,52, 1660. (Variation of viscosity of starch paste.)
Lancaster, E. B. et al., Cereal Chern., 1966,43, 637. (Rheological properties of alkaline
starch pastes.)
Lancaster, E. B., Cereal Chern. Today, 1968, 13, 248. (Alkalisorbtion and swelling of
starch.)
Leach, H. W., Cereal Chern., 1959, 36, 534. (Structure of the starch granule.)
Lobanov, D. I., Chern. Abstr., 1961,22877. (Starch gelatinisation.)
Maslova, G. M., Die Starke, 1967,7,26 (referat). (The rheological properties of potato
starch pastes.)
Mazurs, E. G. et al., Cereal Chern., 1957,34, 141. (Brabender viscosity curves.)
McDonald, J. W., USP 3,103,451, 10 Sept. 1963. (Non-congealing cereal starch pastes.)
Mellies, R. L., J. Chern. Eng. Data, 1960,5, 169; Die Starke, 1961, 13, 114. (The Corn
Industries Recording Viscometer.)
Meyer, K. H. and Fuld, M., Helv. Chirn. Acta, 1942,25,391. (On the viscosity of starch
pastes.)
Meis, P. E., Treadway, R. H. and Smith, L. F., Ind. Eng. Chern., 1944, 36, 159. (The
influence of electrolytes on starch paste.)
Miller, B. S. and Mench, J. W., 'The viscosity of starch sirups', Purdue University,
Lafayette, Ind., 1946.
Milyutin, A. A., Chern. Abstr., 1958,52,2437. (The dependence of viscosity on the rate
of treating of starch during the drying process.)
Morsi, M. K. E. S., Univ. Microfilrns, 1965, Order 65-14548. (physical-chemical proper-
ties of starch-water systems.)
Nakagaki, M., Bull. Chern. Soc. Japan, 1961, 34, 316; Chern. Abstr., 1961, 55, 16079.
(Dynamic viscosity and dynamic rigidity of starch solutions.)
Nakagaki, M., Chern. Abstr., 1962, 57, 7683. (Viscoelasticity and structure change of
starch solutions.)
Nakamura, Z., Chern. Abstr., 1964, 61, 9624. (Viscosity of wheat starch, gel strength
wheat starch. Effect of the addition of salts, acids, alkalis.)
THE RHEOLOGY OF STARCH 89
Nara, S. et al., Chern. Abstr., 1965,63,5881. (Effect of monoglycerides on the viscosity
and swelling of starch.)
Nishiuchi, T., Chern. Abstr., 1965,63,778. (Decrease of viscosity of an aqueous solution
of carboxymethyl starch.)
Osman, E. M., Cereal Chern., 1960, 37, 464. (Starch paste and oils in Brabender
amylograph.)
Ott, M., Cereal Chern., 1965, 42, 476. (Gel formation as related to concentration of
amylose and degree of starch swelling.)
Ozasa, H. et al., Chern. Abstr., 1959, 53, 12733. (Correlation of viscosity and freezing-
point depression in dilute starch-water systems.)
Patel, C., USP 3,152,925, 18 Aug. 1961. (High viscosity starch derivatives by treating in
unmodified starch with dichlorobutene.)
Patel, C. and Pyle, R. E., USP 3,271,387, 6 Sept. 1966. (High viscosity starch derivatives
with alkyl chlorothioformiates.)
Popov, I. D., Chern. Abstr., 1960,54, 10457. (The influence of salts on the viscosity of
starch solutions.)
Ramaszeder, K., Die Starke, 1971, 23, 176. (Rheological examination of textile starch
pastes.)
Rankin, J. C., et al., Die Stiirke, 1972, 187. (Acid-modified wheat flours, pasting and
dispersion properties.)
Reinders, M. A. and Gotlieb, K. F., Neth. Pat. 6,707,287, 1968. (Reaction of starch
with 90% amylopectin and POCI 3 .)
Richardson, W. A., Shirley Institute Mernoirs, 1933, 12, 101. (The flow of starch pastes.)
Robinson, J. V., Tappi, 1966,49,505. (The effect on urea on the viscosity of starch and
casein solutions.)
Samec, M., Die Stiirke, 1956, 8, 107. (Ageing of solutions of starch fractions.)
Schaffer, W. c., Cereal Chern., 1962,39,304. (Intrinsic viscosity of dehaldehyde starch.)
Schierbaum, F., Die Starke, 1966, 18, 110. (Heat-moisture treatment.)
Schierbaum, F., Germ. Pat. 38,076, 29 June 1964. (Edible swollen starch.)
Schoch, T. J., Cereal Chern. Today, 1959,4,202; Die Stiirke, 1959, 11, 156. (Brabender
viscosity curves and Brookfield viscosity at different rate of shear for various thick-
boiling starches: corn, tapioca, waxy sorghum, cross-bonded waxy sorghum.)
van Schoonneveldt, J. V. et al., Landbouwk. Tijdschr., 1968, 80, 63. (Effect of super-
phosphate manuring on yield of starch potato varieties and on the quality of the
starch.)
Schutz, R. A., Bull. Inst. Text., 1959, 81, 87. (Description of a viscograph-type of
apparatus for cooking starch paste.)
Schutz, R. A., Contribution it I'etude de I'amidon, Diss., Strasbourg, 1962.
Schutz, R. A., Die Stiirke, 1971, 23, 359. (Characterisation of starches with respect to
their applications in the textile and paper industry.)
Seves, A., Ric. Doc. Tessile, 1965, 2, 15. (Gelation of oxydised and esterified starch on
prolonged standing.)
Seves, A. and Croce, A., Ind. Carta (Milan), 1966, 4, 209. (Mechanical treatment of
starch paste caused disappearance of thixotropy, converting it in a pseudoplastic
substance.)
Shimizv, T., Chern. Abstr., 1962, 57, 10908. (Swelling of starches cross-linked by
epichlorohydrin.)
Shimizu, Y., Chern. Abstr., 1956,50, 8092. (Jelly strength.)
Smidsroed, O. et al., Carbohydrate Research, 1967,5,582. (Degradation rates measured
by viscosity measurements.)
Sterling, c., Food Research, 1956,21, 680. (Relation of age with strain retardation in a
starch gel.)
90 EXAMINATION AND ANALYSIS OF STARCH
Sterling, c., Chern. Abstr., 1958, 52, 6664. (Crystallisation is the predominant factor
conferring rigidity on the gel.)
Sugimoto, K. et at., Chern. Abstr., 1966, 65, 20345. (Viscosity of potato starch as
measured by a B-type viscometer and an amylograph.)
Suzuki, H., Chern. Abstr., 1956,50, 16147. (Viscosity in 5 N KOH or NaOH.)
Suzuki, H., Chern. Abstr., 1959, 53, 3747. (Viscograph curves of acid-treated starches.)
Suzuki, S., Chern. Abstr., 1965, 63, 5882. (Amylograph cooling curves of potato, sweet
potato, wheat and corn starch.)
Takahashi, S. et al., Chern. Abstr., 1958, 52, 21185. (Viscoelastic properties of starch
paste.)
Takahashi, S. Chern. Abstr., 1959,53, 15610. (Effects of metal ions on potato starch.)
Tani, T., Chern. Abstr., 1957,51,9190. (Flow curves of rice-starch pastes in the Stormer
viscometer.)
Tegge, G., Die Starke, 1961, 13, 292. (Viscograph curves, influence of hard water, salts
and of P-content.)
Uematsu, T., Chern. Abstr., 1959, 53, 20932. (A method of measurement of viscoelastic
constants of pastelike materials at very low frequencies by electrical equipment.)
Tolmasquim, S., Chern. Abstr., 1966, 64, 19953. (Starch of Cicer arietinum is of the
cross-linked type, caused by the presence of fat.)
Ulmann, M., Die Starke, 1953, 5, 307. (Hoppler viscometer insufficient for the evalua-
tion of potato starch paste.)
Vasileva, E. G. and Veksler, B. A., Sakh. Prorn., 1967,41,51. (Changes in plasticity of
the sirup during crystallisation of dextrose.)
Wataribe, H., Jap. Pat. 14,488, 5 Nov. 1960. (Starch paste having sufficient stability.)
Wegner, H. and Winkler, S., Die Starke, 1954,6, 187. (Requirements for and measure-
ments of potato starch pastes.)
de Willigen, A. H. A., Vestnik Slovenskega Kerniiskega Drustva, 1954, 1, 131 (Samec
number). (Raising phosphorus content and viscosity of potato starch by agricultural
measures.)
de Willigen, A. H. A., Kali, 1957,33. (Viscosity of potato starch and manuring of the
potato.)
Winkler, S., Die Starke, 1957, 9, 213. (Measurements with the Viskowaage.)
Winkler, S., Die Starke, 1961,13,319. (Viscograph curves of H- and Kation-starches.)
Winkler, S., Die Starke, 1965, 17, 381. (Comparison of two viscometers.)
Winkler, S., Die Starke, 1966, 18, 316. (Comparative measurements of structural
viscosity of starch solutions.)
Winkler, S., Luckow, G. and Donie, H., Die Starke, 1971,23,325; 1972,24,58.
Wollerman, L. A., Cereal Sci-Today, 1958,3,244. (Properties ofpregelatinised starches.)
Yasumatsu, K., J. Food Sci., 1964, 29 (2), 198. (Changes of characteristics of starch
during gelatinisation in the presence or absence of fatty acid.)
CHAPTER 4
INTRODUCTION
The industrial uses of starch are so numerous and the requirements of the
product are so varied, that a large number of techniques are necessary for
its complete characterisation. The problems encountered are further com-
plicated because of the many varieties of starch which are important in
industry and the numerous modifications produced by oxidation, acid
modification, dextrinisation and other methods. Some tests are made by
the starch manufacturer to control the quality of his products during
processing or to ensure that they meet required specifications. The same
or other tests may be made by the consumer to check the specifications or
to compare competitive products. Still other investigative methods are
used in research on fundamental problems of starch chemistry or in the
development of new or improved products. Standardised procedures for
the analysis and examination of maize starch have been laid down by the
Com Industries Research Association and these include the determination
of inherent viscosity and colour.
In the consideration of the problem of investigating starch it is important
to note that the literature on the subject contains almost innumerable
references to instruments and techniques for the purpose, of which some
are only of historical interest at present. It would be impossible to consider
all of them, and in this chapter attention will be centred on those of
importance at the present time, and especially on those which proved
valuable in the industrial evaluation of starch products. It occasionally
happens that methods which are reported in the literature have not proved
of general value for this purpose, and on the other hand some methods of
great value in industry have not been published and are therefore not
widely known.
91
Starch products find their greatest use in the textile, paper, adhesive and
food industries. They are usually cooked with water and used as hot or
cold fluids or as gels. It is customary to refer to dispersions of cooked
starch in water which are fluids as starch pastes, and this term is used to
indicate even those which are very dilute and which do not seem pasty at
all. While in many theoretical studies quite dilute pastes are often used in
order to avoid complicating effects which occur at higher concentrations,
many of the industrial tests must be made on pastes of a great enough
concentration so that the properties determined permit an adequate
prediction to be made of the industrial performance of the product. The
number of tests required and their nature depend on the purpose of the
examination and the circumstances under which it is made. They will be
enumerated and classified below and the description of the individual
tests will be given later in the chapter.
It is apparent that the starch manufacturer, knowing the variety of
starch and the treatment to which it has been subjected, need only make a
limited number of tests when the purpose is quality control and standardisa-
tion of the product. Those usually made are:
(a) Viscosity or fluidity of hot starch paste
(b) Alkali fluidity, especially for acid modified starches
(c) Colour
(d) Odour
(e) Hydrogen ion activity or pH
(f) Acidity or alkalinity
(g) Moisture
materials to cause them to sift easily. On the other hand there are
uses for which a mobile starch is unsuited. An example is its use in
pharmaceutical tablets such as aspirin where a mobile starch will
not form a firm, strong tablet.
For the examination of an unknown starch or for the comparison of
competing starches some of the following tests must usually be made in
addition to those listed above:
(a) Microscopic examination (see Chapter 1).
(b) Analysis for mineral matter. This may be simply a determination of
total ash, or a qualitative or quantitative analysis may be required.
(c) Analysis for nitrogen. This may be necessary to determine the
presence of added nitrogenous matter.
(d) Analysis for fat, to determine whether fats, oils, soaps or similar
products may have been added.
(e) Determination of water soluble material, which may show the
extent of modification of the starch or the presence of added
substances.
(f) Examination of opacity of the paste, which is of assistance in
determining the variety of starch.
(g) Determination of the gelatinisation range, which is of value in
establishing the variety of starch and the treatment it has been given.
All of the methods given above are also useful in theoretical research or
in the development of new or improved products, and in addition
numerous other techniques may be employed. Important among these are:
(a) Alkali liability number 2 - 4
(b) Copper reducing number 5 ,6
(c) Iodine titration 7,8
(d) Fractionation of starch by complex formation 9 -1 0
(e) Action of enzymes 11
It is the function of this chapter to present only the physical methods of
testing starch. Tests of a chemical nature have been discussed elsewhere
(see Chapter 5).
4.1 VISCOSITY
(a) The initial temperature of the water used for the paste should not
vary greatly
(b) The rate of increase of temperature must be the same in all tests
(c) The highest temperature to which the paste is cooked should be
closely controlled, and should not vary by more than a few tenths
degree C
PHYSICAL METHODS OF CHARACTERISING STARCH 95
It follows that for viscosity tests the paste should be made with distilled
water, it should be cooked in a water bath which is thermostatically
controlled, stirring should be done mechanically and the stirrer should be
powered by a motor which will maintain constant speed under varying
load. Furthermore, when the paste is transferred to the viscometer it is
necessary to perform this operation quickly to minimise the drop in
temperature which will occur. The viscometer must be preheated to the
temperature of the test to avoid heat loss from the paste to the instrument,
and great care must be exercised to ensure that it is clean.
be taken to prevent paste being stirred into the beaker above the paste
level. If a ridge forms, it may harden and such material transferred to the
viscometer cup may partly or completely plug the orifice.
In an effort to overcome variations in cooking procedure, most labora-
tories now use motor-driven stirrers. Direct introduction of steam into the
paste for heating and stirring has been applied. 45 This simulates the
cooking method employed by many starch users. It requires careful
adjustment of steam to produce a uniform rate of heating the starch and a
constant rate of boiling. The Scott cup is frequently provided with an
overflow at the 200 ml mark so that the paste can be introduced quickly
without first measuring it in another vessel.
4.1.5 Pipettes
Where a rapid approximate determination is to be made on a paste of
rather low viscosity, the Dudley47 or other pipette is often used. The paste
is drawn into the pipette and the flow of the measured volume is timed.
The pipette may be equipped with a constant-temperature jacket as in the
case of the pipette used by Chrzaszcz and Piorozek. 51 In industrial testing,
pipettes are often used without any means of maintaining a constant
temperature. Such determinations are subject to considerable error but
have the advantage of greater speed and convenience.
with thick starch pastes the wire does not reach an equilibrium rapidly.
Instead the reading slowly decreases over a period of several minutes due
to breakdown of paste structure. In tests with 5 % unmodified corn starch
Bechtel found that the reading fell 16 units over a period of 6 min. This
makes it difficult to decide what reading to take as the viscosity and makes
any figure purely arbitrary. The other difficulty is that the water bath,
like that of the Stormer, is very small. Even by use of the supplementary
heater provided, it is difficult to control paste temperature accurately
because of loss of heat to the rather massive disc and the supporting
column which surrounds the torsion wire.
One cannot derive the viscosity of a cold paste from the hot paste viscosity
determination. Starches from different sources and those given different
treatment in manufacture differ widely in the extent to which their pastes
thicken on cooling. While unmodified tapioca, potato and waxy maize
starches have high hot paste viscosities, their cold pastes thicken or 'set
back' much less than those of the common cereal starches. When a cereal
starch such as corn starch is modified by acid to a moderate extent, the
tendency of the cold paste to congeal is much greater than would be
expected from its hot paste viscosity. On the other hand, when such a
starch is oxidised by hypochlorite, the tendency of the cold paste to
thicken is much reduced. Therefore, whenever a starch is to be used in the
form of a cold paste, it is necessary to determine the paste viscosity under
approximately the conditions of temperature and concentration at which
it will be used.
For the determination of cold paste viscosity orifice or capillary
viscometers can be used if the concentration of starch is low, for example
in the order of 2 %or less for unmodified corn starch, or if the starch is highly
modified so that the cold paste is thin. Katz,l with 1 % corn and potato
starch, used an Ostwald viscometer. Where it is necessary to test pastes of
higher concentration and of low degree of modification so that the cold
104 EXAMINATION AND ANALYSIS OF STARCH
pastes are rather thick, they tend to clog the orifice. In such cases a
rotational instrument such as the Stormer or MacMichael can be used to
advantage. The paste should be prepared with all the precautions required
for a hot paste, and in the concentration range in which results will be
significant in terms of the intended use of the starch. When the paste has
been cooked it is placed in a constant-temperature bath to cool to the
temperature desired for testing. The cooling period may be about 3 h, but
whatever time is allowed, must be kept uniform so that all pastes will cool
at the same rate and to the same temperature. If a skin forms on the
surface it must be removed prior to testing.
Since the extent of viscosity increase depends on the time that the paste
stands, it is frequently necessary to make further tests after longer periods
of time. In commercial practice two tests are often made, one after 3 h
and one after 24 h. From these data reasonably accurate information is
gained about the rate and extent of thickening. It should be observed that
the above procedure refers to fluid pastes. If a gel has formed on cooling,
it is necessary to use a lower starch concentration.
of the granules and this continues until a maximum is reached, after which
it decreases more or less depending on the variety of starch and the
modification it has been given during manufacture. The instruments and
methods previously described are best suited for making single determina-
tions of paste viscosity. They have been used to make a number of deter-
minations from which a viscosity curve has been derived, but the process
is rather laborious because of the necessity of cooking large samples and
of cleaning the viscometer between tests.
Instruments have been developed by which a series of viscosity curves
can be recorded on a chart. Such instruments are now widely used and
are of great value because they completely characterise a starch and give
the temperature of initial viscosity rise, gelatinisation range, maximum
viscosity, time of cooking and temperature at the maximum, and the
viscosity at any time during the cooking period, from which the rate and
extent of decrease in viscosity after the maximum can be obtained. When
it is desired, a cooling curve can also be made.
Another advantage of these instruments is that the entire cooking and
testing procedure can be controlled automatically so that the results are
entirely free from the effects of variations in technique due to different
operators. The value and importance of this feature is made apparent by
reference to the detailed cooking and testing procedure given under the
Scott Test, in which a slight deviation from the described technique alters
the result of the test.
The consistometer of Caesar 6 7.68 has a beaker for the paste, surrounded
by an electrically heated water bath. The paste is stirred by a streamlined
agitator driven by a constant-speed electric motor, and the changes in
viscosity are followed by observing the power input in watts required to
drive the agitator through the paste at uniform speed. These readings are
then graphed against paste temperature. By passing a stream of cooling
water through the water bath the changes in viscosity during cooling can
be observed. Its function is to measure viscous and plastic effects in
concentrated pastes, with a working range of 15 to 30 % concentration of
starches. Caesar has stated that the lower limit of concentration which
can be used is 10%.
In their study of the gelatinisation of starch, Mullen and Pacsu 116
developed a consistometer of the same principles but somewhat different
design. Radley 69 has designed a similar instrument, only that the power
input into the motor is maintained constant and the speed of the stirrer
is allowed to vary. In this case motor speed is graphed against paste
temperature. The curves are the inverse of those obtained by Caesar. A
106 EXAMINATION AND ANALYSIS OF STARCH
FIG.4.1. Barham, Wagoner and Reed Viscometer. (1) Oil bath. (3) Electric heaters.
(9) Cooling coil. (11) Rotating solution cup. (13) Suspended torque cylinder. (Courtesy
H. N. Barham.)
PHYSICAL METHODS OF CHARACTERISING STARCH 107
, r--.;,
.
of a synchronous motor. The cover, which does not touch the rotating
vessel, has several small cylindrical rods which extend down into the paste.
It is fastened to a vertical shaft which is connected to a coiled torsion
spring. The rods stir the paste when the vessel is rotated, and the torque
of the paste against them turns the shaft until it is balanced by the torsion
spring. Attached to the spring is a pen by means of which the changes in
viscosity of the paste are recorded on a chart of the strip type. An interesting
feature is a means for controlling the temperature rise so that it occurs at
the constant rate of about I·5°C/min. The thermoregulator can be pre-set
so that at any desired temperature no further rise will occur. A means for
controlling the rate of cooling so that it too can be made constant, is
provided. The method of Schoch and co-workers 135 is recommended but
alternative procedures, e.g. that of Anker and Geddes, 3 6 who have made a
critical evaluation of the instrument, can be used. The latter found that
duplicate curves agree closely both in the temperature at which significant
changes occur and in the values of viscosity. They tested the effect of
adding wheat gluten, buffers, enzymes and cold gelatinising agents. They
also showed results obtained with a series of modified corn starches. Meiss,
Treadway and Smith 61 used this instrument for measurements with potato
starch and studied the effects of drying methods and of water soluble
materials.
When using the Brabender instrument for evaluating starches from
different sources, or with different histories of chemical and physical
treatment, or both, complete cooking and cooling curves can be determined
for each sample at 5 to 8 concentrations chosen over the range of the
instrument. When these curves are plotted and superimposed on rect-
angular co-ordinates, a family of curves is obtained. These contain five
successive points of interest.
1. The highest viscosity that the user may encounter during the prepara-
tion of a usable paste, is indicated irrespective of the temperature
(peak viscosity).
2. The viscosity of the paste, when it reaches the temperature of 95°C
in relation to the peak viscosity, reflects the ease of cooking starch.
3. After cooking for one hour at 95°C, the viscosity curve indicates the
stability or breakdown of the paste.
4. The viscosity of the cooked paste after cooling to 50°C is a measure
of the thickening produced by cooling.
5. The final viscosity after stirring for one hour at 50°C indicates the
stability of the cooked paste to mechanical treatment.
110 EXAMINATION AND ANALYSIS OF STARCH
Not only does hot water gelatinise starch to form pastes, but many
inorganic and organic chemicals cause starch to gelatinise in cold water.
These have been studied extensively by many investigators and their
effects are described elsewhere in this book. Several methods of evaluating
starches based on the use of added chemicals have been proposed. Among
these are the thiocyanate viscosity method of Richardson 77 and of
Jambuserwala. 78 Methods based on the use of soap have been proposed by
Houtz,71 Heald,7 9 and Kesler and Black. 8 0 However, the only method of
this type which has come into general use is the alkali fluidity procedure
first described by Buel 46 which is used regularly in the corn starch industry
for characterising certain kinds of starch products.
are compared, the alkali fluidities do not give the same relative values as
the pastes prepared by cooking the starches with water. If, for example,
corn starch and tapioca starch of the same alkali fluidity number are
cooked, it is found that their viscosities are quite different. Similarly if
two starches are manufactured by different processes they may have the
same alkali fluidity number but will give cooked pastes which differ
widely. Nevertheless, when its limitations are understood, the method is of
great value and is frequently used both for factory control of the modifying
process and as a specification for the finished product.
Various procedures and funnels are in use 49 but the following directions
are typical. The fluidity funnel is an ordinary glass funnel of 4 in (100 mm)
diameter with the stem cut short. A glass tube of the same diameter as the
stem is drawn out to form an orifice about 1~ in (1·6 mm) in diameter.
Funnel stem and tube are joined by a short piece of rubber tubing, so that
the total length of stem and tip is about 3 in (75 mm). The tip is made so
that when 110 ml of distilled water at 75°F (24°C) is in the funnel, 100 ml
will flow out in 70 s. (As stated above, any such funnel should be further
standardised by use of other liquids of higher viscosity.)
5 g of starch is placed in a 250 ml beaker to which 10 ml of distilled
water is added, and a smooth slurry made. Then 90 ml of 1 % sodium
hydroxide at 75°F (24°C) is added and the paste is stirred for 3 min at
about 70 rpm. It is then placed in a water bath maintained at 75°F (24°C)
where it remains for 30 min without stirring. The fluidity funnel is also
immersed in the bath until 3 min before the test is made, when it is removed
and is allowed to drain. A finger is held under the tip, the funnel is tilted
somewhat, then the paste is poured in carefully so that the stem is filled
and free from bubbles. A 100 ml graduated cylinder is placed under the
tip and the paste is allowed to flow. The volume of paste which flows in
70 s, timed with a stopwatch, is the alkali fluidity.
testing glue, gelatine and pectin gels. Most of these have not been success-
fully applied to starch testing, because as a rule they are not sufficiently
sensitive and precise for measuring the properties of starch gels, which are
generally far less strong.
4.4.3 Rigidity
The rigidometer of Brimhall and Hixon 8 5 consists of a tall cylinder
with a long narrow tube suspended in it from a torsion wire. The head of
the wire is equipped with a pointer and the top of the jar has a graduated
scale. A paste is poured into the cylinder, the tube is centred, and the paste
is allowed to form a gel. The wire is twisted an arbitrary amount and the
resulting turn of the tube is measured by the deflection of a beam of light
reflected from a mirror on the tube to a large scale. Care must be exercised
that the wire is not twisted through an angle great enough to shear the
gel, as this would destroy the value of the measurements. Torsion wires may
be calibrated in absolute units so that the modulus of rigidity can be
calculated.
The Bloom gelometer 89 which is used in the glue and gelatine industry
is sometimes used for starch gels of high concentration. This instrument
measures the weight required to produce a depression of 4 mm depth in
PHYSICAL METHODS OF CHARACTERISING STARCH 115
4.4.6 Syneresis
On being allowed to stand, starch gels, like others, tend to lose water
leaving a more concentrated gel. This process of ageing is called syneresis.
A study of the syneresis of starch gels was made by Chapman and
Buchanan, 9 6 who found that the amount of syneresis increases with the
surface exposed, and with age. With increase in starch concentration it
decreases, while the length of cooking the paste has little effect. Acetates,
sulphates, oxalates and citrates were found to increase syneresis, while
many other salts retard it. Of the salts tested, those most effective in
retarding it were chlorides of calcium, strontium and barium, sodium
PHYSICAL METHODS OF CHARACTERISING STARCH 117
4.5.2 Translucency
Samec l02 observed that if an incandescent light bulb is immersed in a
glass vessel containing a starch suspension which is being heated, a sudden
change in translucency occurs at a definite temperature. Cook and
Axtmeyer l03 devised a procedure by which a beam of light is passed
through a starch suspension and actuates a photoelectric cell connected to
a micro-ammeter. Readings of current and temperature are made and the
results when graphed give curves showing the beginning of gelatinisation
and the range. Cook and Axtmeyer stated that the method is capable of
accurate duplicability and that it is suitable for the identification of
starches and for determining the treatment given them during manufacture.
The method of Cook and Axtmeyer was refined by Morgan l04 who
made a study of the gelatinisation range of a large number of commercial
starches. Characteristic curves were obtained for each kind of starch, and
modification of the starch could be followed by the changes in the curves,
for with increased modification gelatinisation was found to occur at
progressively lower temperatures. Morgan also showed the application of
his method to the quantitative analysis of mixtures of starches. An
interesting feature of the method is that only 0·33 g of starch is needed.
The suspension is heated at a constant rate of 2·SoCfmin so that the test
can be completed in half an hour. Kuntzel and Doehner l 0 5 used a similar
method but included a recorder to obtain the transmission-temperature
curve automatically.
4.5.4 Viscosity
Ostwald10 6 used the increase in viscosity of starch paste as a means of
determining gelatinisation points, making a series of viscometric tests at
increasing temperatures. He regarded as the ge1atinisation point the
temperature at which viscosity showed a sudden large increase. Alsberg
and Rask 97 studied the ge1atinisation of wheat and corn starches by
determining viscosity at various temperatures using the Stormer viscometer.
Their results show that the increase in viscosity with rising temperature is a
gradual process taking place over a range of 25 to 30 degrees. They there-
fore concluded that there was no definite temperature of gelatinisation, but
rather a gelatinisation range, a conclusion also drawn by Radley141 from
his work. The newer visco meters by which a viscosity-temperature curve is
recorded, or by means of which a series of readings can be made readily,
are well suited for the determination of ge1atinisation range. A great
advantage of these instruments for this purpose is that the gelatinisation
range is found in the same test that gives the viscosity curve. This method
appears to be equally as sensitive as any other.
4.5.5 Moisture
A comprehensive study of the problems involved in the accurate
determination of moisture in starch has been made by Sair and Fetzer.t07
They found that moisture can be removed completely without causing
decomposition of the starch, either by distillation with toluene using a
modification of the Bidwell-Sterling method/os or by heating it in a
vacuum oven to constant weight at 100°C. At an oven temperature of
135°C it was found that dextrins and highly modified starches lost volatile
matter other than water. Another finding of great importance was that
starch heated for as long as 40 h at 100qC in an air oven gave a moisture
analysis about 1%below that obtained in the vacuum oven. Their methods
120 EXAMINATION AND ANALYSIS OF STARCH
with the precautions given in their original article, are suitable for reference
methods of great accuracy.
It is often desirable in practice to use rapid oven methods. One fre-
quently used routine procedure is to heat 5 g of starch in a metal moisture
dish for 4 h in a vacuum oven at 105°C. The official German method
requires that 5 g of starch be heated for 1 h at 50°C then 3 h at 120°C in
an air oven. 1 0 9 There are available various rapid moisture testers by
means of which a moisture value can be obtained in a few minutes. Such
arbitrary methods should be used only after comparison of the results
with one of the reference methods. A correction chart may then be made
for obtaining true moisture-content from the results of the rapid test.
When starch is to be used for food or f01 paper coating, the presence of
foreign matter is very undesirable, and the determination of the amount
and its nature is essential.
Several methods are available for the separation of foreign matter from
starch. One rapid method which is frequently used is to sieve a definite
weight of dry powdered starch through a 200-mesh screen or through
No. 17 bolting silk until the starch has passed the screen leaving upon it
the foreign matter. Another is to suspend 50 g of starch by stirring in
500 ml of distilled water. The suspension is then passed through a layer
of No. 16 or No. 17 bolting silk. Other methods are presented in a hand-
book prepared by the US Food and Drug Administration,l1o including
procedures applicable to food products which contain starch.
If the starch is oily, as in the case of confectioners' moulding starch, it is
advisable to remove the oil by washing it with acetone. This greatly
improves its sieving properties. Acetone is to be preferred to ether or
petroleum ether because if the starch is to be suspended in water prior to
sieving, the acetone will dissolve readily.
When the foreign matter has been separated from the starch its amount
may be estimated. The nature of the particles may be determined by
microscopic examination. The handbook referred to above 11 0 has proved
of great value for the identification of foreign matter as it gives a discussion
of methods of microanalysis which may be employed, and descriptions
and illustrations of various kinds of contamination which may be present.
For starches and dextrins needed in first class work, the absence of
specks due to bran, dirt and particles of metallic origin is often essential,
PHYSICAL METHODS OF CHARACTERISING STARCH 121
4.6.1 Odour
Examination for odour is made to determine possible rancidity of the
fat present in cereal starches, and mouldiness which may be due to poor
storage conditions. One method is to place a quantity of starch in a flask
or beaker, then add water at 160 to 170°F, stir quickly and note the odour.
Another and less rapid method is to place the starch in a jar with a tight-
fitting top and heat it for 16 h at 130°F. As soon as the jar is opened the
odour is noted. Unpleasant odours can be detected readily by either
procedure.
4.8 COLOUR
4.11.1 Dustiness
In one patent 137 for making dustless starch, by blending in 0·005-5·0%
of glyceryl acetates or similar polyhydric alcohol esters, a test is given to
measure the 'dustiness' of powders wherein 10 g of the product under
test is allowed to fall freely through a glass column open at both ends.
After 4 s the bottom of the tube is closed with a tared card and any air
suspended starch in the column allowed to settle on the closure which is
then re-weighed.
Another test is also described 138 wherein a pre-determined amount of
material is agitated under pre-determined conditions, e.g. by rolling in a
small drum for a given time and speed of rotation and passing air through
it at a given rate of flow and collecting and weighing the extrained starch
dust.
In general, the methods already given for starches are also applied to the
examination of dextrins and gums. An excellent example of the use of
126 EXAMINATION AND ANALYSIS OF STARCH
4.12.1 Viscosity
Because the viscosity of these products usually is so much lower than
that of starches, tests are made using much more concentrated pastes.
From 30 to 50 % or even higher concentrations may be used, depending
on the product tested. An orifice or pipette viscometer is used industrially
and it may be jacketed with a water bath to maintain constant temperature.
The dextrin is made into a smooth suspension with cold water and is then
cooked to 85°C after which it is cooled to some standard temperature and
the viscosity test is made. The temperature chosen is usually near room
temperature. If the dextrin is to be used in an adhesive which contains
borax, the same proportion of borax is added to it before cooking it for
the viscosity test. This is necessary because the effect of borax in altering
viscosity differs with the type of product. It should be noted that the
addition of 0·5 to 1 %of sodium hydroxide, based on the weight of dextrin,
increases the effect of the borax and this must be considered in testing.
Some dextrins and gums, when prepared as pastes, thicken or 'set back'
and turn cloudy on standing. For some purposes this is a disadvantage.
The extent of set-back may be determined by making a viscosity test after
24 h and comparing the result with that found immediately after cooling
the paste. With insufficiently roasted dextrins the development of cloudiness
is very marked and such dextrins do not behave normally in adhesive
formulations.
REFERENCES
ADDITIONAL REFERENCES
Ramaszeder, K., Die Starke, 1971, 22, 176. (Discusses rheological examination of
textiles pastes and concluded rotational viscometers are best for viscosity determina-
tion.)
Shibukawa, S. and Fukuba, H., Kaseigaku Zasshi, 1973,24 (1), 45. (Convenient method
to measure starch gelatinisation rate in foodstuffs. Gelatinised starches dehydrated
with alcohol, dried, ground and sieved and resuspended in H20. Rates of A to B of
sample to fully gelatinised sample gave values comparable with amperometric
titration-A is initial turbidity, B turbidity after 100 min.)
CHAPTER 5
INTRODUCTION
5.1 MOISTURE
The moisture content of a starch is of economic importance as a purchaser
does not wish to pay for an excessive amount of water and also the storage
133
(a) Oven methods, including vacuum oven, high temperature and other
modifications
(b) Azeotropic distillation
(c) Karl Fischer
(d) Electrical properties
CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF RAW AND MODIFIED STARCHES 135
Boiling pt.
Added liquid A Boiling pt. A 01 azeotrope Wt %olA
with water
Toluene has become the standard distillation liquid. The Com Industries
Research Foundation 9 regard azeotropic distillation to be the most
accurate method for all starches and employ it as a referee technique and
to establish conditions for the estimation of moisture by simplified
methods for control analysis. The standard apparatus consists of a 250 ml
squat type distillation flask connected by ground glass joint to a graduated
trap or receiver, capacity 5 ml graduated in tenths of a millilitre, which is
connected to a drip-tip-water jacketed condenser 40 cm long.
Starch samples containing hard granular pellets should be ground,
taking precautions to prevent significant loss of moisture. However, in
most cases, grinding is not necessary.
CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF RAW AND MODIFIED STARCHES 139
5.2.1 Calcium
Calcium may be determined on the ash by dissolving in hydrochloric
acid, neutralising with ammonia, precipitating the calcium as oxalate,
filtering and titrating the oxalate with standard permanganate solution.
The amount of calcium is so small in normal samples of starch that it
would be necessary to ash large quantities of sample which is time-
consuming and inconvenient. Ashing can be avoided by extracting the
calcium with 1·2 N hydrochloric acid as in the Corn Industries Research
method. 21 Weigh 100 g (± 1 g) of sample into a dry I-litre Erlenmeyer
flask. Add 400 ml of 1·2 N hydrochloric acid solution, stopper and agitate
continuously at a moderate rate for 5 min. Filter the slurry through a dry
Whatman No. 12 paper into a dry receiving flask. Transfer 200 ml of
filtrate to a 400 ml beaker. Place 200 ml of 1·2 N hydrochloric acid in a
144 EXAMINATION AND ANALYSIS OF STARCH
second beaker to serve as a blank, and carry the sample and blank con-
currently through the procedure. With the aid of a pH meter, adjust
solution pH to 4·5-5·5 by addition of concentrated ammonia. Add 3 drops
of concentrated hydrochloric acid and place in a boiling-water bath.
To the hot solution, add 25 ml of saturated ammonium oxalate solution
and 30 g of urea. Stir to dissolve, cover with a watch glass, and heat in
the boiling-water bath for 2·5 h. Assurance of completion of the neutralisa-
tion reaction is best obtained by external use of bromo thymol blue
indicator (blue colour if neutralisation is complete). If the indicator is
used internally, no colour change is observed until the solution cools.
Allow reaction mixture to cool to room temperature. Filter by gravity
through Whatman No. 42 paper (since titration is carried out in the
precipitation beaker; quantitative transfer of the precipitate is unnecessary).
Wash the beaker and paper with four 25 ml portions of saturated calcium
oxalate solution followed by two 10 m1 portions of distilled water. Return
filter paper and precipitate to the precipitation beaker: add 100 ml of
distilled water and 10 ml of 12 N sulphuric acid while stirring. Heat to
70-80°C with stirring to macerate the paper and dissolve the precipitate.
Add three drops of manganese sulphate solution; titrate the hot mixture
with 0·1 N potassium permanganate solution to a faint pink end point
which persists for 30 s.
Calcium may also be determined by flame photometry or by atomic
absorption spectrophotometry the latter being the more precise.
The following method is that given in the Fertilisers and Feeding Stuffs
(Amendment) Regulations 1970: 22
Reagents: Calcium stock solution-Dry calcium carbonate at 105°C
for 1 h. Transfer 2·497 g into a 1 litre volumetric flask using approximately
100 ml water. Add slowly with swirling 60 ml N hydrochloric acid. When
all the calcium carbonate has dissolved, dilute to 1 I with water.
1 ml == 1 mg calcium
5.2.2 Phosphorus
Ashing may give low results due to the formation of fused glassy residues
which are difficultly soluble, these may be avoided if the sample is first
mixed with calcium oxide and the temperature of incineration not allowed
to exceed 500°C. Alternatively the organic matter may be destroyed by
wet combustion using nitric acid/sulphuric acid mixture or nitric acid and
permanganate.
The phosphorus may be precipitated as phosphomolybdate or, better, as
the quinolinium phosphomolybdate or, in view of the small amount of
phosphorus in samples of starch, spectrophotometrically as molyb-
divanado-phosphoric acid. This method is employed by Corn Industries
Research Foundation 23 as follows:
Standardisation Curve: pipette 5·0, 10·0 and 15·0 ml of standard
phosphorus solution into respective 100 ml volumetric flasks, and use
another flask for a blank. To each flask add in order, 10 ml of 29 %nitric
acid, 10 ml of 0·25 % ammonium vanadate, and 10 ml of 5 % ammonium
molybdate, mixing thoroughly after addition of each reagent. To avoid
interference from precipitation and side reactions, reagents must be added
in the order stated. Since the vanadate and molybdate are present in large
excess, volumes of reagents need not be controlled more closely than
± 1 ml. Dilute to volume with distilled water, mix thoroughly and allow
to stand for 10 min. Using the blank as a reference solution at 100 %
146 EXAMINATION AND ANALYSIS OF STARCH
5.2.3 Fat
T. C. Taylor and J. M. Nelson,25 considered that a small amount of the
fat contained in maize starch is in combination with the starch and not
removable by solvents, a conclusion which has since been proved wrong.
On hydrolysis this fat is set free and appears as palmitic acid, etc.
Further work by T. C. Taylor and L. Lehrman 63 has showed that the
fatty matter has approximately the following percentage composition:
palmitic acid 24, oleic acid 40, linoleic acid 36. The above workers find
that the percentage of fatty matter in maize starch is approximately 0·5,
in rice starch 0·83, in sago starch 0·11 and in cassava starch 0·12.
Thus, for some years a distinction was made between the so-called
'combined fatty acids' and the free fatty acids, the latter being readily
removable by extraction with ether or petroleum ether in a Soxhlet
apparatus, the former requiring acid hydrolysis of the starch before being
set free. It is now known that all the fat in the granules is but loosely held,
the major portion being removed from intact granules by a Soxhlet
extraction with methanol for 10 h. When the granules are disintegrated a
short extraction gives complete and easy removal. 26
K. A. Clendenning and D. E. Wright2 7 have carefully prepared pure
samples of starch according to the methods of various workers. 28 - 31
The fat content was determined by the acid-digestion method and it was
found that the fat content of the waxy starches was consistently lower than
that of the corresponding non-waxy cereal starches. Oat starches had by
far the highest fat content averaging 1·2 %. The fat content of legume,
bulb and tuber starches was low but measurable.
According to Schoch 32 defatting may be accomplished by hot extraction
with a suitable hydrophylic fat solvent which will remove the fat without
swelling or gelatinising the starch granules (e.g. methanol, ethanol, 80%
dioxane, 2 methoxyethanol (cellosolve)). Hydrocarbons, ethers or
chlorinated solvents do not extract fatty materials from starches.
with 200 ml of distilled water, heat to boiling, and add to the starch
suspension. Heat acidified starch sample to boiling and boil for 5 min or
until a negative starch test is obtained upon addition of a weak iodine
solution. Place in a cold-water bath (below 25°C) for 30 min to coagulate
fatty acids.
Gravity filter reaction mixture through Whatman No.1 paper and wash
residue with distilled water at room temperature until the filtrate is neutral
to methyl orange indicator. Wipe adhering fat from inside of beaker with a
clean filter paper and combine with main residue. Fold filter paper con-
taining the residue, place on a watch glass and dry for 3 h in air oven at 50°C
or overnight in a warm place. Place folded filter paper containing dried
residue in extraction shell. Plug top of shell with cotton extracted pre-
viously with carbon tetrachloride and place in extractor. Attach a previously
dried and weighed Erlenmeyer flask containing about 50 ml of carbon
tetrachloride. Attach water-cooled condenser and place assembly on
heater. Be sure all connections in the extraction assembly are tight to avoid
loss of solvent during extraction. Adjust heat to produce 150 to 200 drops
of condensed solvent per minute and extract for 3 h. Disconnect flask and
evaporate solvent on steam bath until no odour of solvent remains. Place
in vacuum oven for 1 h at 100°C. Prolonged drying of the extract at
elevated temperatures may cause high results due to fat oxidation. Cool
in desiccator and weigh.
5.2.5 Protein
The amount of protein in a sample of starch will depend upon the origin
of the starch and the degree of refinement. Good grades of wheat starch
contain less than 0·2 % protein, maize starch contains 0·1--0·2 %, protein,
tapioca shows a greater range of protein content ranging from 0·15 % in
the highest grades to 1·0 %, whilst potato starch contains only a negligible
amount of protein. Millet starch has the highest protein content-over
1 %; commercial rice starch may also be high in protein.
Direct determination of protein is seldom attempted although methods
involving the precipitation of protein have been devised and the advent
of automated amino acid analysers has made a more direct approach to
protein analysis practical. For routine purposes the protein content is
estimated by applying a factor to the nitrogen content as determined by the
kjeldahl method. The factor is empirical and is based on the average nitrogen
content ofthe proteins present. For all vegetable proteins other than wheat
the factor adopted is 6·25 but for wheat, in which the average nitrogen
content of the proteins is higher, the factor of 5·7 is usually employed.
150 EXAMINATION AND ANALYSIS OF STARCH
5.3 ACIDITY
50·0 mg ± 0·1 mg of starch are weighed into a Pyrex test tube 8 in x lin
and 10 ml of 0·1 N NaOH added. The tube, loosely stoppered, is floated
on a boiling water-bath for 1 h, after which it is cooled for 30 sunder
running cold water, 10 ml of 0·1 N HCI being added immediately it is
removed from the cold water and the contents of the tube well mixed by
thoroughly shaking. The mixture is transferred to a 250 ml Erlenmeyer
flask, the tube being washed twice with 10 ml distilled water and the
washings added to the flask.
Two drops of nitrazine yellow solution are added and the liquid is
neutralised with 0·1 N NaOH. Five ml of the alkali are then added,
followed immediately by 5·0 ml of 0·025 M standard iodine solution; the
last three operations should be carried out within 3 min. The flask is kept
at 25-30°C for 45 ± 1 min in the dark, and then 5·0 ml of conc. HCI
CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF RAW AND MODIFIED STARCHES 153
If the long chains of glucose units forming the starch molecule are
parallel and co-ordinate links exist between the R of the OR groups of
some chains and the 0 bridges of others as has been suggested the free
aldehyde groups at the end of the chain, although primarily chemically
free, might be protected by a dovetail-like fitting end to end of the bundles
of parallel-bound chains. Disassociation of the co-ordinately-linked
chains from one another would make the aldehyde groups available whilst
hydrolytic scission of glucosidic linkages would give shorter chains and
consequently new aldehydic groups. Taylor and Keresztesy 43 think the
great increase in alkali-labile value in making soluble starch by dry-
grinding (see Starch Production Technology), or by the Lintner acid-
process, is due to the terminal aldehyde exposed by disassociation of
the chains, whereas the slower hydrolytic breakdown of the glucosidic
links is responsible for the fairly steady rate of fall ultimately attained.
A good grade, commercial air-dry maize starch gives an alkali-labile
value of about 22, tapioca starch 14, a thin-boiling starch 60 and a yellow
dextrin 20. The method should be of value in examining oxidised and
acid-treated soluble starches.
M. Samec and B. Skerl 44 have studied the dependence of alkali-labile
value on the length of boiling and temperature to differentiate between
erythro- and amylo-substances. Native and partially attacked starch gave
quite different results. The fractionation methods previously employed by
these workers, e.g. pressure cooking, electro-dialysis, coagulation by
freezing or by ageing, caused no structural changes as judged by alkali-
labile value. They consider that a large number of starches can be
characterised by this value.
154 EXAMINATION AND ANALYSIS OF STARCH
Working iodine solution. Dilute stock solution x 10. Prepared fresh each
day as it is unstable.
156 EXAMINATION AND ANALYSIS OF STARCH
Typical values for the purified lincar (amylose) fraction from various
starches are as follows:
Maize (corn) 19'0%, wheat 19·9%, potato 19·9%, tapioca 18·6%.
The calculation of the amylose contcnt of a given sample of starch from
these figures can only be approximate as there are possible intermediate
fractions between strictly linear chains (amylose) and highly branched
(amylo pectin) chains and long straight side chains may have some iodine
affinity.
Foster 48 has suggested that 'iodine affinity' should more properly be
designated 'iodine binding capacity' (I.B.C.).
Alternative amperometric methods of determining iodine absorption
are dealt with in Radley, J. A. Starch and Its Derivatives, Chapman &
Hall, London (1968).
The iodine absorption may also be measured by the 'Blue Value,49
based on the work of McCready and Hassid. 5 0
This is determined as follows:
Baker, Parker and Mize,51 have separated the starch and gluten of wheat
flour by the ordinary gluten working technique, the starch being collected
by centrifuging. The top or 'amylodextrin' layer was separated from the
prime quality starch in the lower layer and purified by successive washing
and centrifuge treatments. Upon analysis the 'amylodextrin' fraction was
found to contain 14·0% of pentosans using the Schmidt-Nielson and
Hammer method. 59 The prime quality starch gave a content of 0·4 %
pentosans by this method. These authors concluded that the wheat starch
granules were all coated with insoluble pentosans, the higher pentosan
content of the 'amylodextrin' fraction being attributed to the smaller
average particle size and the concomitant greater surface area of this
fraction as compared with the prime quality starch fraction.
Clendenning and Wright27 find the same differences between the two
fractions. They found that the phloroglucide of the second distillate from
prime quality wheat starch was completely soluble in 95 % ethanol. Using
the Hughes-Acree bromine oxidation method 65 or phloroglucinol
precipitation 66 for the estimation of 'furfural', dextrose gave apparent
pentosan contents of the same order (0·4 %). Evidently with large samples
of starch redistillation from saturated sodium chloride does not ensure
complete removal of hydroxy-methyl-furfural as has hitherto been
assumed.
TABLE 5.2
Reducing power of starches and starch products
Specific
H 2O Ash Fat Protein %
Sample rotation
% % % (N X 6·25)
degrees
REFERENCES
1. Furlong, J. R., Chern. Trade J., 1943, 165; Bull. Insp. Inst., Oct.-Dec. 1943.
2. British Pharmacopoeia 1968, p. 936.
3. Sair, L., Ind. Eng. Chern. Anal., 1942, 14, 843.
4. Sprockhoff, M., Zeit. Spiritusind., 1929,52,27.
5. British Standard Specification, BS 4317: Part 2,1968.
6. Porter, W. L. and Willets, C. L., J.A.O.A.C., 1944,27, 179.
7. Corn Industries Research Foundation, Standard Methods of Analysis, B.38, 1958.
8. Fairbrother, T. H. and Wood, R. J., Ind. Chern., 1930,8,442.
9. Corn Industries Research Foundation, Standard Methods of Analysis, B.34, 1956.
10. Official Methods of Analysis, A.O.A.C., 11th ed., 1970, 122.
11. Mitchell and Smith, Aquarnetry, Interscience, New York, 1948, pp. 187, 194-197.
12. Schmidt, M. R. and Jones, H. C., Arn. Chern. J., 1909,42, 37-41.
13. Kameyana, N. and Semba, T., J. Soc. Chern. Ind. Japan, 1927,30, 10-14.
14. Lund, H. and Bjernim, J., Ber., 1931,64,210-13.
15. Zerewitinoff, T., Zeit. Anal. Chern., 1911,50, 680.
16. Saare, 0., Zeit. Spiritusind, 1884, 7, 18, 550.
17. Tryller, H., Chern. Zeit., 1920,44,833.
18. Official Methods of Analysis, A.O.A.C. 11th ed., 1970, p. 526.
19. Corn Industries Res. Foundation, Standard Methods of Analysis, B.8, 1955.
20. VOiksen, W., Vorratspfl. Lebensrn., 1941,4,270; Chern. Zentr., 1942, 1, 2, 2466.
21. Corn Industries Research Foundation, Standard Methods of Analysis, B.1O, 1960.
22. The Fertilisers and Feeding Stuffs (Amendment) Regulations, 1970, S.I. No.
328/1970, HMSO, London.
23. Corn Industries Res. Foundation, Standard Methods of Analysis B.46, 1957.
24. Fertilisers and Feeding Stuffs Regulations, 1968, S.I.218/1968, HMSO, London.
25. Taylor, T. C. and Nelson, J. M.,J. Arn. Chern. Soc., 1920,42,1726.
26. Griffiths, J. G. A., Analyst, 1937,62, 510.
164 EXAMINATION AND ANALYSIS OF STARCH
27. Clendenning, K. A. and Wright, D. E., Canad. J. Res., 1945, 23B, 131.
28. Shewfelt, A. L. and Adams, G. A., Can. Chem. Process Ind., 1944,28,502.
29. Ling, A. R., J. Inst. Brewing, 1922,28,843.
30. Sandstedt, R. M. et al., Cereal Chem., 1939, 16, 780.
31. Eynon, L. and Lane, J. H., Starch, W. Heffer & Sons Ltd, Cambridge, 1928.
32. Whistler, Methods in Carbohydrate Chemistry, Vol. IV, Academic Press, New York,
1963, p. 56.
33. Ibid., p. 59.
34. Corn Industries Research Foundation, Standard Methods of Analysis, B.48, 1956.
35. Official Methods of Analysis, A.O.A.C., 9th ed., 1960, 2.036.
36. Whistler, Carbohydrate Chemistry, Vol. IV, Academic Press, New York, 1964, p. 47.
37. Tryller, H., Zeit. Spiritusind, 1934, 57, 19.
38. Preservatives in Food Regulations, 1962, S.I. No. 1532/1962, HMSO, London.
39. Scheele, c., Afzelius, J. and Leander, K., Zeit. Spiritusind, 1937,60,163.
40. Corn Industries Research Foundation, Standard Methods of Analysis, B.2, 1955.
41. Taylor, T. C. and Salzmann, G. M., J. Amer. Chem. Soc., 1933,55,264.
42. Taylor, T. c., Fletcher, H. H. and Adams, M. H., Ind. Eng. Chem. (Amal. Ed.),
1935, 7, 321.
43. Taylor, T. C. and Keresztesy, J. c., Ind. Eng. Chem., 1936, 28, 502.
44. Samec, M. and Skerl, B., Kolloidchem. Bich., 1937, 47, 91.
45. Schoch, T. J. and Jensen, C. C., Ind. Eng. Chem. (Anal. Ed.), 1940, 12, 531.
46. Bates, F. L., French, D. and Rundle, R. E., J. Amer. Chem. Soc., 1943, 65, 142.
47. Wilson, A. J., Jr., Schoch, T. J. and Hudson, C. S., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1943, 65,
1380.
48. Foster, J. F., in Starch Chemistry and Technology, ed. Whistler & Paschall, Vol. I,
Academic Press, New York, 1964, p. 371.
49. Gilbert, G. A. and Spragg, S. P., Methods in Carbohydrate Chemistry, Academic
Press, New York, 1964, p. 168.
50. McCready, R. M. and Hassid, W. Z., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1943,65, 1154.
51. Baker, J. c., Parker, H. K. and Mize, M. D., Cereal Chem., 1943,20,267.
52. Gladding, E. K. and Purves, C. B., Paper Trade J., 1943, 116, Tappi 150.
53. Richardson, W. A., Higginbotham, R. S. and Farrow, F. D., J. Text. Inst., 1936,27,
131T.
54. Farley, F. F. and Hixon, R. M., Ind. Chem. (Anal. Ed.), 1941, 13, 616.
55. Gore, H. C. and Steele, H. K., ibid., 1935,7, 324.
56. Hagedorn, M. and Jensen, B. N., Biochem. Z., 1923, 135, 46.
57. Martin and Newton, J. N., Cereal Chem., 1938, 15, 456.
58. Hassid, W. Z., Ind. Eng. Chem. (Anal. Ed.), 1936, 8, 138; 1937,9,228; 1940,12,142.
59. Schmidt-Neilson, S. and Hammer, L., Kgl. Norske. Videnskab. Selskab. Forh.,
1932,5,84.
60. Fischer, K., Angew. Chem., 1935,48,394.
61. Smith et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1939, 61, 2407.
62. Jones, A. G., Analyst., 1951,76, 5.
63. Taylor, T. C. and Lehrman, L., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1920, 42, 1726.
64. Corn Industries Research Foundation, Standard Methods of Analysis, B.20, 1955.
65. Hughes, E. E. and Acree, S. S., Ind. Eng. Chem. (Anal. Ed.), 1934, 6, 123.
66. Official Methods of Analysis, A.O.A.C., 10th ed., 1965, 22.05()....22.051.
67. Richardson, W. A., Chem. and Ind., 1939,58,468.
68. Higginbotham, R. S. and Richardson, W. A., J. Soc. Chem. Ind., 1938, 57, 239.
69. Knyaginichev, M. I., Colloid J. (USSR), 1939,5,899.
70. Elizer, L. H., Ind. Eng. Chem. (Anal. Ed.), 1942, 14, 635.
71. BS 4628: Part 2, 1970. Methods of Test for Starch: Pt. I, Determination of Loss in
Mass on Drying.
CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF RAW AND MODIFIED STARCHES 165
INTRODUCTION
Many methods are in use for the determination of starch, but most of
them are applicable to a limited type of work only. They may be roughly
classified under the following headings:
The best known of such methods is that due to O. s. Rask 6 in which the
starch is dispersed in cold concentrated hydrochloric acid from which the
starch is recovered by precipitation with alcohol. This method was at one
time adopted as a tentative method by the American Association of
Official Agricultural Chemists. 7 C. W. Herd and D. W. Kent-Jones 8
modified the method for application to mill feeds and mill products. Their
procedure was as follows:
The formation of additive products between starch and iodine was used
by A. Kaiser 16 as a method for determining starch, and later Th. von
Fellenberg 17,18 used calcium chloride solution to dissolve starch, which
was then precipitated by the addition of iodine solution. The calcium
chloride acts as a salting-out agent for the starch-iodine complex, and this
is decomposed with alcohol to give starch. J. J. Chinoy and F. W.
Edwards, 19 other workers 20,21 and H. Weiss 22 have used similar methods.
J. C. Smalf 3 uses ammonium sulphate to salt out the starch iodide from
aqueous dispersions and to remove the dextrin-iodine complexes present.
W. Whale,24 using an iodometric method for food products, points out
that the presence of dextrin introduces an error not easily overcome, and
in such cases advocates one or other of the hydrolytic methods. He has
successfully applied the volumetric iodide method to the determination of
starch in cocoa and sweetened chocolate. 24
170 EXAMINATION AND ANALYSIS OF STARCH
The method of Hling and Whittle 25 has been modified by Bagnall and
Smith26 for the determination of starch in lemon curd but could be used
for many foods:
Reflux 20 g of sample with 100 ml 95 % alcohol in a boiling-water
bath for 6 h. Filter on a Buchner funnel. Re-extract the residue as
before with more alcohol and filter. To the residue on the Buchner
funnel add 75 ml of 0·7 % aqueous potassium hydroxide solution and
gelatinise the starch by simmering gently for 30 min. Transfer the hot
liquid to a 200 ml volumetric flask, cool and make up to volume.
Filter. Neutralise 20 ml of filtrate with 5% acetic acid using phenol-
phthalein. Add 8 ml of 0·1 N iodine solution and 4 ml of either 10%
potassium acetate solution or alcohol and allow to stand until the
precipitate settles and centrifuge. Decant off the supernatant liquid.
Rub the residue with a rod and treat with 12 ml of a mixture con-
taining 10 ml of95% alcohol and 2 ml 0·1 N sodium thiosulphate by
addition in several small quantities. When the particles are thoroughly
broken up with the rod, add 25 ml of 80 % alcohol and filter through
a weighed Gooch crucible. Wash the residue with 95 % alcohol, dry
and weigh the starch.
The colour of the starch-iodine complex has also been used for the
determination of starch in flue-cured tobacco using an auto analyser112
with a precision of ± 3'9 % and for the determination of amylose
in starches and floursY3 The conditions must be standardised in
order to get reproducible results.
within anyone variety but differed from the corresponding values for
other varieties.
Table 6.1 shows the figures obtained by J. Konig and co-workers 53
using both Ewers' and Lintner's methods on the same starches. Ewers'
method gives considerably lower rotations and vary much more with
different starches. A mean value could not be used for all without serious
TABLE 6.1
(where n is the number of glucose residues in the amylose chain [M]n and
[M]2 the molecular rotations of an n-membered amylose chain and
maltose, respectively, and [M]oojoo is the molecular rotation per glucose
unit of an infinitely long amylose chain) allows one to calculate the value
of the specific rotation of an amylose chain of any given number of
glucose units after calculating that of an infinite chain of glucose residues.
The fact that amylodextrins give clear solutions is of great value here, as,
for example, with an amylodextrin of 22 glucose residues having a specific
rotation of [a]o = + 193°, maltose with [a]o = + 131 ° the respective
molecular rotation per glucose residue is [M]2 = 47200. The molecular
rotation per glucose residue is [M]oojoo = 32200, which corresponds to a
specific rotation for the infinitely long amylose chain of + 199°, agreeing
quite well with the figure obtained with butanol-precipitated amylose.
the Lintner method. Mannich and Lenz 3 presented data upon the effect of
various factors upon the optical rotatory powcr but their work was
confined to wheat starch and they did not indicate how they dctermined
the 'true starch content'. The multiplicity of optical rotatory values for
starch and of the methods and conditions for obtaining these values con-
stituted a most unsatisfactory state of affairs. Fortunately K. A.
Clendenning and D. E. Wright 59 have now investigated the effect of
solvent, pH, salt concentration, extraction temperature and time, filtration
technique, starch concentration and polarisation temperature upon the
optical rotatory power of wheat starch dissolved in aqueous calcium
chloride solutions. Clendenning 60 then extended this work to other
starches. He found that the addition of small amounts of 0·8 %acetic acid
to concentrated calcium chloride solutions as practised in the Mannich-
Lenz method causes a remarkable increase in the pH value. With 15 min
boiling at pH 2·1 to 3·0 little effect was exercised on the specific rotatory
power; above pH 4·0 the starch solutions are cloudy, difficult to filter and
gel on standing; at pH values below 2·0 the specific rotatory power is
depressed. The specific rotatory power is depressed by rising extraction
temperature to an extent varying with time and pH value but is unaffected
up to 1 h boiling period between pH values of 2·2-2·5. It is increased
quite remarkably, however, by rising salt concentration. Substituting
magnesium chloride for calcium chloride increased the specific rotation
value for wheat starch approximately 7°. The concentration of starch
appears to have a negligible effect but a rising polarisation temperature
causes a decrease in the value over the temperature range of 20°C to 35°C.
Clendenning considers a satisfactory solution of calcium chloride to be
one having a density of 1·30 adjusted to pH 2·2-2·5 by the addition of 2 cc
of 0·8 % acetic acid to 60 cc of the essentially unadjusted salt solution
(pH 5·5), or by acidifying the salt solutions en masse with glacial acetic
acid as suggested by Earle and Milner. 3 5 At this acidity level the specific
rotatory value is relatively insensitive to variations in the time of heating
provided alterations in salt concentration are avoided. A suitable boiling
time appears to be about 15 min. After heating the solution is cooled and
the volume adjusted with distilled water. With starches of low fat content
no cloudiness is occasioned by this step. The specific rotation is depressed,
however, because of the accompanying decrease in salt concentration. 61
Clendenning prefers to use calcium chloride solution of the same tempera-
ture. Filtration is generally required and the first fractions of filtrate
should be discarded as otherwise the sorptive properties of the filter paper
for water give high values.
DETERMINATION OF STARCH IN VARIOUS PRODUCTS 177
Reagents
Alcohol solvent-O'1 % mercuric chloride in 900 ml water plus 100 ml
of95% EtOH.
Calcium chloride solution-550 g of CaCl 2 • 2H 2 0 dissolved in 760 ml
water and adjusted to s.g. 1·30 and pH 2·0 (± 0·1) the pH being adjusted
by the addition of glacial acetic acid.
Uranyl acetate solution-1O g of uranyl acetate dihydrate dissolved in
80 ml of water and 20 ml of glacial acetic acid.
Heat to not over 60°C and add 100 mg of calcium chloride solution
(supra).
Method
Transfer about 2 g of sample, accurately weighed to a test tube and
extract by shaking vigorously for 2 min with 10 ml of alcohol solvent.
Filter through 9 cm hardened paper with suction and wash with about
25 ml of alcohol solvent.
Transfer filter paper and contents to 250 ml beaker. Macerate with 10 ml
water. Add 60 ml of calcium chloride solution and bring to boil in about
5 min whilst stirring. Boil vigorously for 30 min with occasional stirring
and maintain volume by addition of water. Cool to room temperature.
Add 10 ml of uranyl acetate solution and dilute to 100 ml in volumetric
flask by the addition of calcium chloride solution. Mix, allow to stand
for about 5 min. Filter through 18·5 cm folded filter paper rejecting first
portion of filtrate. Determine optical rotation of the filtrate in a 2-dcm
tube. A blank should be done on the reagents and observed rotation
corrected accordingly.
Reagents
Hydrochloric acid s.g. 1·125
Sodium hydroxide 5 N
Method
Mix about 2·5 g of flour with 50 ml of cold water to a smooth suspension
and allow to stand for 1 h. Having filtered to remove soluble material add
to the residue 20 ml of hydrochloric acid and 200 ml water and reflux for
2! h. Cool, make nearly neutral with 5 N sodium hydroxide and make up
to 250 m!. Determine sugar (as dextrose) by Lane and Eynon method.
Dextrose x 0·90 = starch.
Takadiastase
Takadiastase preparations, which contain many different enzymes, 82
were introduced as a quantitative reagent for determining starch by
W. A. Davis and A. J. Daish 83 in 1914. 1. D. Collins 84 pointed out that,
at proper pH value and correct time, a high concentration of the enzyme
182 EXAMINATION AND ANALYSIS OF STARCH
Amyloglucosidase
Amyloglucosidase is an enzyme which is produced by fungi, particularly
Aspergillus, Rhizopus and Endomyces. Commercially, Aspergillus niger is
used for its production. It has the advantage over the other amylases that
it splits starch into glucose by splitting glucose units from the non-reducing
ends of starch chains. Pazur et al. 8 8 have shown that it acts preferentially
on longer chains. The enzyme also hydrolyses glucosides, although the
rate of reaction is often slow.
Amyloglucosidase has been employed for the determination of starch
by Salo and Salmi 8 9 as follows:
1 g of sample is mixed with about 10 g of sand and extracted with
80 % ethanol in a soxhlet apparatus for about 5 h. The residue is then
dried at room temperature and transferred to a conical flask containing a
few ml of water. After the addition of 25 ml of water the mixture is boiled
for 5 min. Any starch adhering to the sides of the flask is then rinsed down
with 25 ml of hot water and the boiling continued for a further 5 min.
The mixture is then cooled, 50 mg of amyloglucosidase, and 25 ml of
acetic acid/sodium acetate buffer pH 4·8 containing 0·01 % sodium
merthiolate added and the flask almost filled with water. After incubation
at 40°C for 20-22 h, shaking hourly for the first 3-4 h [alternatively the
mixture may be incubated at 60°C for 4-5 h shaking every 30 min],
the contents of the flask are filtered through a filter paper, washed and the
volume made up to 500 ml. The concentration of sugar in the filtrate may
DETERMINATION OF STARCH IN VARIOUS PRODUCTS 183
such as cake flour, whole wheat flour and whole Lima beans, were also
used. When the calcium chloride method was applied to these, the samples
were washed on filter paper, instead of being centrifuged with alcohol, as
recommended by Hopkins. Contrary to statements in the literature, this
worker found that all the starch in the reputed pure and commercial
starches was not obtained either by hydrolysis with hydrochloric acid or
by diastase treatment followed by acid hydrolysis. The results were even
lower than the 96 to 97 % of the total starch found by Noyes et al. 64 On
the other hand, with natural materials the diastase and hydrochloric acid
method (a) gave fairly concordant results comparing better with those
obtained by the calcium chloride method (b). Thus the following mean
percentages were found: cake flour, (a) 72·87, (b) 75·90; whole wheat
flour, (a) 66·95, (b) 67·29; rice bran, (a) 6·84, (b) 8·22; corn meal, (a) 62·44,
(b) 63·76; whole rice, (a) 71·75, (b) 77·31; Lima beans (a) 45·56, (b) 42·54.
In most instances the calcium chloride method was very satisfactory with
the pure starches. The Hopkins modification seemed to be the most
promising single method and, by careful control of heating and the use of
accelerated filtration, can be advantageously applied to natural materials.
Other chemicals were tried as dispersing agents in an effort to prevent
filtration difficulties. The use of calcium nitrate and sodium salicylate
showed possibilities, although the dispersions were still difficult to filter.
On the other hand, sulphosalicylic and formic acids gave promising
results, and the dispersions could be readily filtered.
Other comparative studies of the various methods of starch determina-
tion have been published by Saunders, Potter et al. 104 who compared
chemical, polarimetric and enzymatic methods for the determination of
starch in wheat milling fractions. They considered that enzymatic methods
were best for those products which had a high fibre content.
Mauser and Thomas 1 05 have worked on the standardisation of methods
for starch determination and consider that enzymatic methods are the
most accurate although extraction of the starch with alcohol posed some
problems. Banks, Greenwood and Muir 106 used a semi-micro method
which needed only 7·5-20 mg of starch. The starch was solubilised in hot
aqueous CaCl z and hydrolysed by a-amylase and glucose oxidase.
The following method using diastase is used for the determination of
starch in cocoa but could be adapted for many foods:
To 5 g of defatted material add 100 ml of 12 %alcohol, shake, filter and
wash with 20 ml LM.S. Heat the extracted material with 50 ml of distilled
water in a boiling water-bath for 20 min. Cover, add 0·1 g of diastase and
incubate at 50 -55°C for 2 h. Cool, make up to 250 ml and filter. Mix
0
186 EXAMINATION AND ANALYSIS OF STARCH
200 ml of the filtrate with 20 ml hydrochloric acid (e.g. 1·125) and heat in
boiling water for 3 h. Cool, neutralise with NaOH and make up to 250 ml.
Determine reducing sugars in solution by Fehlings or other suitable
method. Dextrose x 0·90 = starch.
REFERENCES
1. Leclerc, A., J. Pharm. chim., 1890,21, 641.
2. Biourge, P., Zeit. ges. Brauw., 1908,31,277.
3. Mannich, C. and Lenz, K., Zeit. Nahr. Genussm., 1920,40, 1; Can. J. Res., 1934,
11, 751.
4. Hopkins, C. G., Can. J. Res., 1934, 11, 751.
5. Jirak, L. W., Zeit. Spiritusind., 1935,58,81.
6. Rask, O. S., J.A.O.A.C., 1927, 10, 108 and 473.
7. A.O.A.C., Official and Tentative Methods of Analysis, 1930.
8. Herd, C. W. and Kent-Jones, D. W., J. Soc. Chem. Ind., 1931,50, 15T.
9. Jones, L., J.A.O.A.C., 1932, 15, 582.
10. Rask, O. S., ibid., 1927, 10,473.
11. Etheridge, M. P., ibid., 1942,25,621.
12. Krug, W. H. and Wiley, H. W., J. Amer. Chem. Soc., 1898,20,266.
13. Mayrhofer, J., Forsch. Ber. Lebensm., 1896,3,141 and 429.
14. Baumert, G., Zeit. Nahr. Genussm., 1909, 18, 167.
15. Analyst (Lond.), 1952,77, 544.
16. Kaiser, A., Chem. Ztg., 1902,26, 180.
17. Fellenberg, Th. yon, Mitt Lebensm. Hyg., 1916,7, 369.
18. Fellenberg, Th. yon, ibid., 1917,8.
19. Chinoy, J. J., Edwards, F. W. and Nanji, H. R., Analyst (Lond.), 1934, 59, 673.
20. Eckart, H., Chem. Zell. Gewebe, 1925, 12, 243.
21. Long, W. S., Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci., 1916,28,172.
22. Weiss, H., Zeit. ges. Brauw., 1922, 45, 122.
23. Small, J. C., J. Amer. Chem. Soc., 1919,41, 107, 113.
24. Whale, W., Analyst (Lond.), 1938, 63, 328, 421.
25. IlIing, E. T. and Whittle, E. G., Food (Lond.), 1944, 13, 32.
26. Bagnall and Smith, Analyst (Lond.), 1945,70,211.
27. Kerr, R. W., Chemistry and Industry of Starch, Academic Press, New York, 1944,
125.
28. Baudry, A., Zeit. Spiritusind., 1892, 15,41.
29. Baudry, A., Dingler's Po/ytech. J., 1892,285,238.
30. Pellet, L. and Metillon, Bull. Assoc. Chim. sucr. distil., 1906,24, 1720.
31. Effront, J., J. Soc. Chem. Ind., 1896, 15, 923.
32. Crispo, D., Ann. Chem. Anal., 1899,4,290.
33. Mannich, C. and Lenz, K., Zeit. Nahr. Genussm., 1920, 40,1.
34. Clendenning, K. A., Can. J. Res., 1942, C20, 403.
35. Earle, F. R. and Milner, R. T., Cereal Chem., 1944,21, 567.
36. Fraser, J. R. and Holmes, D. C., Analyst (Lond.), 1958, 83, 371.
37. Lintner, C. J., Zeit. ges. Brauw., 1907, 30, 109.
38. Lintner, C. J., Zeit. Nahr. Genussm., 1907, 14,205.
39. Wenglein, 0., Zeit. ges. Brauw., 1908,31, 53.
40. Lintner, C. J., Zeit. Nahr. Genussm., 1908, 16, 509.
41. Ibid., Zeit. Angew. Chem., 1912,25, 1177.
DETERMINATION OF STARCH IN VARIOUS PRODUCTS 187
42. Canet, M. and Durieux, 0., Bull. Soc. Chim. Be/g., 1907,21,329.
43. Konig, J., Greifenhagen, W. and Scholl, A., Zeit. Nahr. Genussm., 1911,22,714.
44. Hals, S. and Heggenhangen, S., Landsw. Verso Stat., 1917,90, 391.
45. Ewers, E., Zeit. offentl. Chem., 1905, 11,407; 14, 8 and 50.
46. Ewers, E., ibid., 1910, 15, 8.
47. Ewers, E., Zeit. ges. Brauw., 1915,21,232.
48. Ewers, E., ibid., 1908,31,250.
49. Davis, W. A. and Daish, A. J., J. Agric. Sci., 1913, 5, 437; ibid., 1914, 6, 158.
50. Jahn, V., Zeit. Unters. Lebensm., 1927,53,262.
51. Knyaginichev, M. I. and Palilova, V. K., Biokhimiya, 1939,4,423.
52. Kavcic, J. Kolloid Chem. Beih., 1930,30,406.
53. Konig, J., Griefenhagen, W. and Scholl, A., Zeit. Nahr. Genussm., 1911,22,714.
54. Eynon, L. and Lane, J. H., Starch, Heffer, Cambridge, 1928.
55. Meyer, K. H., Recent Developments in Starch Chemistry, in Kraemer's Advances
in Colloid Science, New York, 1943, 143-182; also Natural and Synthetic High
Polymers, Vol. 4, pp. 387-402 (in same series).
56. Freudenberg, K., Friedrich and Buman, Ann., 1932,494,41.
57. Etheridge, M. P., J.A.O.A.C., 1944,27,404.
58. Porst, C. E. G. and Crown, H. A., Ind. Eng. Chem., 1913,5, 304.
59. Clendenning, K. A. and Wright, D. E., Canad. J. Res., 1945, 23B, 113.
60. Ibid., 1945, 23B, 131.
61. Steiner, E. T. and Guthrie, J. D., Ind. Eng. Chem. Anal. Ed., 1944, 16, 736.
62. Browne, C. A. and Zerban, F. W., Physical and ChemicalMethods 0/ Sugar Analysis,
3rd ed., Wiley, New York, 1941.
63. Standard Analytical Methods 0/ the Member Companies, Corn Research Founda-
tion, Washington, Method G.28.
64. Noyes, W. A. et al., Journ. Amer. Chem. Soc., 1904,26,266.
65. Fraps, G. S., J.A.O.A.C., 1932, 15, 304.
66. Ling, A. R., J. Soc. Chem. Ind., 1923,42, 48T.
67. Kent-Jones, D. W. and Amos, A. J., Modern Cereal Chemistry, 5th ed., Northern
Publishing Co., Liverpool, 1957, p. 560.
68. Waldeschmidt-Leitz, E., Reichel, M. and Parr, A., Naturwiss., 1932,20,254.
69. Nordh, G. and Ohlsson, E., Zeit. physiol. Chem., 1932,204, 89.
70. Ling, A. R., Nanji, D. R. and Harper, W. J., Journ. Inst. Brewing, 1924,30,838.
71. Ling, A. R. and Nanji, D. R., Biochem. Jour., 1923, 17, 593.
72. Van Klinkenberg, G. A., Zeit. Physiolog. Chem., 1932, 212, 173.
73. Taylor, T. C. and Iddles, H. A., Ind. Eng. Chem., 1926, 18, 713.
74. Taylor, T. C. and Walton, R. P., J. Amer. Chem. Soc., 1929,51, 3431.
75. Luers, H. and Weininger, F., Zeit. Ges. Brauw., 1925,48, 35.
76. Ling, A. R., J. Inst. Brewing, 1922,28, 828 and 851.
77. Ling, A. R. and Price, W. J., ibid., 1923, 29, 732.
78. Brown, H. T., Trans. Guiness Res. Lab., 1903, 1, 79.
79. Brown, H. T. and Heron, A., Chem. Soc. Trans., 1879,35, 601.
80. Anon., Ind. Eng. Chem., 1941,13,818.
81. Poe, C. F. and Jukkola, B. J., Food Res., 1944,3, 338.
82. Nishimura, S., Chem. Zell. Gewebe, 1925, 12,202.
83. Davis, W. A. and Daish, A. J., J. Agric. Sci., 1914, 6, 152.
84. Collins, I. D., Science, 1927,66,430.
85. Denny, F. E., Contrib. Boyce Thompson Inst., 1934,6, 129.
86. Lehman, 0., Planta, 1931, 13, 575.
87. Van der Kamer, J. H., Chem. Weekblad., 1941,38,286.
88. Pazur, J. H. and Ando, T., J. Bioi. Chem., 1959,234, 1966-1970; ibid., 1960,235,
297-302.
188 EXAMINATION AND ANALYSIS OF STARCH
89. Salo and Salmi, J. Sci. Agric. Soc., Finland, 1962,40 (i), 38-45.
90. Somogyi, M., J. Bioi. Chem., 1945, 160, 61-68.
91. Maerker, M., Chem. Ztg., 1885,9, 319.
92. Walton, R. P. and Coe, M. R., J. Agric. Res., 1923, 23, 995.
93. Coe, R. M., J.A.O.A.C., 1923-24,7, 341.
94. Coe, R. M., ibid., 1924-25,8, 358.
95. Walton, R. P. and Coe, R. M., ibid., 1923-24,7, 995.
96. Hartmann and Hillig, ibid., 1926,9,482.
97. Fleury, P. P. and Boye1dieu, G., Ann. Falsi/., 1928,21, 124.
98. Hock, A., Biochem. Zeit., 1937, 294, 336.
99. Schultz, A. S., Fisher, R. A. et al., Ind. Eng. Chem., Anal. Ed., 1943, 15, 496.
100. Etheridge, M. P., J.A.O.A.C., 1941,24, 113.
101. Thivend, P., Mercier, C. and Guilbot, A., Methods in Carbohydrate Chemistry,
1972,6, 100-105.
102. Dekker, R. F. H. and Richards, C. N., J. Sci. Fd and Agric., 1971,22,441.
103. Trop, M. and Grossman, S., J.A.O.A.C., 1972,55, 1191.
104. Saunders, R. M., Potter, A. L. et al., Cereal Chem., 1970,47 (2), 140-146.
105. Meuser, F. and Thomas, B., Ber. Getreide Chim-Tag., Detmold, 1972, 111-20.
(Ger.)
106. Banks, W., Greenwood, C. T. and Muir, D. D., Die Starke, 1970,23 (4), 105-108.
107. Schaechter, D., Copony, W. and Staniscu, R., An. Inst. Cercet Cult., Cartojului
Sfec1ei Zahar Bousov. Cartoful, 1969, 219-24.
108. Dudas, F., Acta Univ. Agr. Brno. Fac. Agron., 1971, 19 (4), 719-24 (Czech.).
109. Dudas, F., Die Starke, 1972,24 (11),367-369; 1973,25 (8), 263.
110. Dudas, F., ibid., 1971,23 (11), 390-393.
Ill. Garcia, Q. J. and Wolf, M. J., Cereal Chem., 1972,49,298-306.
112. Anon., Tobacco Science, 1970, 14, 164-166.
113. Williams, c., Kuzina, F. D. and Heynka, I., Cereal Chem., 1970,47 (4),411-442.
114. Bates, F. J. et al., Circular C 440, National Bureau of Standards, Washington,
1942.
115. Bronstead, J. N., Chem. Revs., 1928,5,231.
CHAPTER 7
INTRODUCTION
Answering these questions is the main task for the analytical laboratory
of a factory that manufactures starch derivatives. Only in exceptional
cases a fourth question is posed:
(d) What is the substituent group distribution in the derivative?
In this chapter methods of analysis for answering these questions for
starch derivatives only will briefly be given.
The esterification of starch can be carried out with inorganic and organic
acids and their salts, anhydrides or acid chlorides, or with specific reagents
as for instance vinyl esters. The principal esters of commerce are: acetates
and phosphates; less known are the sulphates, maleates, succinates,
xanthates, etc.
S
II
R· 0 . C-S-CH2 . C 6 Hs + NaBr
In some cases the substituent content of aliphatic esters (e.g. cellulose
esters) can be determined by pyrolysis of the esters and gas-chromato-
graphy of the decomposition products. 7
The pyrolysis of esters normally follows the pattern:
o 0
/' /'
R· C-OCH2' CH 2R -+ R· C-OH + CH 2=CH' R
(b) Anionic starch ethers, from starch and monochloro acetic add,
propane sultone, etc.
(c) Cationic starches, from starch with nitrogen compounds as diethyl-
aminoethylchloroethane, epoxypropane amines, ethylene-imine,
etc.
For each of these groups there are special methods of analysis, utilising
existing methods for cellulose ethers.
(b) Anionic starch ethers, e.g. reaction products of starch and monochloro
acetic acid, propane-sultone, etc.
Carboxymethyl starch. The carboxyl group is easily detected in the
infrared spectrum, but no differentiation can be made between starch
obtained by modification with an oxidising agent and carboxymethyl
starch obtained by derivatisation of starch with monochloroacetic acid.
A high carboxyl content may be assumed to originate from carboxymethyl
starch. If the product evolves carbon dioxide on heating with hydrochloric
acid (uronic acid) it is an oxidised starch, if not it is carboxymethyl
starch. 8 Another method for the detection and quantitative determination
of carboxylic groups is based on the binding affinity of methylene blue and
carboxylate ion. 9
Carboxymethyl starch can further be demonstrated by the formation of
glycollic acid on heating with 50 %sulphuric acid, which glycollic acid is
determined by its reaction with chromotropic acid. 1 0
The presence of sulphopropylether of starch, normally prepared by the
reaction of starch with propane-sultone:
St· OH + CH 2 • CH 2 • CH 2 --+ St· O' CH 2 • CH 2 • CH 2 • S03Na
I I
o S02
is indicated by the sulphur content of the sample and the fact that this
does not alter on saponification, as is the case with starch sulphates.
THE ANALYSIS OF STARCH DERIVATIVES 193
The excess of bromine is decomposed with formic acid and the iodate
determined iodimetrically:
HI0 3 + 5HI ~ 31 2 + 3H 20
31 2 + 6Na 2S20 3 ~ 6NaI + 3Na2S406
Gran 14 later on replaced the bromine in acetic acid solution by a solution
of bromine in a phosphate buffer and obtained good results with this
aqueous solution.
The Zeisel and Viebock method can also be used for the higher alkyl
ethers but is not suitable for the determination of the hydroxyalkylethers,
which are usually manufactured from cellulose or starch with ethylene
oxide or propylene oxide according to the reaction:
""/
ROH + CH2-CH-R1 ~ R· OCH 2 . CHOH· R1
o
R1 = H or CH 3
Morgan 15 has investigated the reaction of HI with compounds of this
type with half ethers of ethylene glycol R· OCH 2 . CH 20H and found
that the sole end products are ethyl iodide and ethylene.
As to the course of the reaction Morgan considers ethylene iodide,
ICH 2CH 2I, is an intermediate product, preceded perhaps by the formation
of ethylene iodohydrin (ICH 2CH 20H). As soon as the ethylene iodide
has been formed, various new reactions may take place
ICH 2 . CH 2I ~ CH 2=CH 2 + 12
+ HI ~ CH 3 . CH 2I + 12
I· CH 2CH 2 . I
CH 2=CH 2 + HI ~ CH 3 . CH 2I
In any case the two end products are always ethyl iodide and ethylene and
the sum of these products is equivalent to the number of glycol ether
groups originally present in the ether. The final formulation is:
ROCH 2 . CH 20H + (3 + x)HJ ~
RJ + (X)CH3 . CH 2J + (1 - x)CH=CH 2 + J 2 + 2H 20
For the quantitative determination of hydroxylalkyl groups the two end
products of fission, alkyl iodide and olefine, have to be determined. The
determination cannot be performed by the Viebock method in this case,
but is carried out as follows:
THE ANALYSIS OF STARCH DERIVATIVES 195
After purification the gas mixture from the reaction with HI is bubbled
through a standardised alcoholic silver nitrate solution, in which after
acidification with HN0 3 the reaction:
RI + AgN0 3 ~ AgI + RON0 2
takes place. The excess of AgN0 3 is back titrated with ammonium
thiocyanate. The olefine which is not absorbed is thereafter collected in a
bromine solution in acetic acid and reacts with the bromine according to:
CH 2=CH 2 + Br2 ~ BrCH 2 · CH 2Br
The excess of bromine is determined iodimetrically after addition of
potassium iodide:
Br2 + 2KI ~ 2KBr + 12
12 + 2Na 2S 20 3 ~ 2NaI + Na2S406
Many variations have been applied to the Vieb6ck and the Morgan
methods with respect to apparatus, scrubber solution and absorbing
solutions.
The foregoing methods do not identify the particular olefine present
and hence the alkyl group. To solve this problem two general methods can
be applied:
1. Gas chromatography of the alkyl iodides either direct or after
absorption.
Many methods are in use for this. Kratzl 16 collects the alkyl iodides
prepared according to the Zeisel method in a cooled vessel, separates the
iodides by gas-liquid chromatography and determines the separate com-
pounds according to Vieb6ck. A somewhat analogous method is used by
Ehrenberger 17 who also determined the gas fractions (olefins) volumetric-
ally.
Other authors collect the iodides in a cold trap, or in a solvent, and then
determine the iodides by GLC with, or without, an internal standard. 18 ,19
A variant on this method is the extraction of the reaction mixture of the
ether and hydriodic acid with a solvent and GLC of an aliquot of the
extract. In this case the use of an internal standard is strongly recom-
mended. 2o ,21
2. Another method for determination of the nature of the ether groups
has been used by Japanese investigators and is based on combustion ofthe
alkyl iodides obtained by carrying out Zeisel's reaction.
CnH 2nO ~ CnH 2n + 1I ~ nC0 2 + tI2
196 EXAMINATION AND ANALYSIS OF STARCH
The products formed in these reactions: toluene and benzyl acetate are
usually determined by gas chromatographic methods.
(3) Other reagents including acylhalides have been suggested to split
ether groups,24 but these reagents have found no use in the analysis of
starch ethers.
(4) Special methods of analysis for specific starch derivatives include:
(i) A spectrophotometric method for the methoxyl group which has
been described by Mathers 2s and consists of the hydrolytic cleavage of
methoxyl to methanol with sulphuric acid. Oxidation of the methanol
with permanganate yields formaldehyde, which is determined colori-
metrically with chromotropic acid. The method is specific for the methoxyl
group.
(ii) The determination of the hydroxy-ethyl group in starch ethers by
pyrolysis-GLC technique is mentioned by Tai. 26 Pyrolysis for 10 min at
400°C of HE starch gives a number of peaks in the chromatogram, of
which the height of the acetaldehyde peak correlates with hydroxyethyl
THE ANALYSIS OF STARCH DERIVATIVES 197
ether content. The problem with this method lies in the reproducibility of
the pyrolysis.
(iii) A quantitative determination of the ethyl group in O-ethyl and
O-ethyl hydroxyethyl cellulose is mentioned by Jacin 27 and is a modifica-
tion of a method of Lemieux. 2 8 Ethylcellulose is oxidised with CrO 3 and
the acetic acid formed determined with a gas chromatograph. This method
is specific for the ethoxyl group, the hydroxyethyl group is not determined.
(iv) For the spectrophotometric determination of the hydroxypropyl-
ether groups in hydroxypropyl starch ethers Johnson 29 describes a method
whereby the ether group is hydrolysed with sulphuric or phosphoric acid.
The propylene glycol formed is dehydrogenated with these acids to
propionaldehyde and the enolform of allyl alcohol, which products give a
purple colour with ninhydrin. This ninhydrin colour reaction is specific for
propionaldehyde, and does not react with other compounds which may be
formed. Large amounts offormaldehyde seem to inhibit the colour develop-
ment. Otherwise the method is specific for the hydroxypropyl group in this
group of substances.
(v) A special non-ionic starch ether is the cyanoethyl ether formed by
reacting starch with acrylonitrile. This ether is easily recognised in the
infra red spectrum and the degree of substitution is, in this case, calculated
from its nitrogen content.
(vi) The type and content of substituent of certain cellulose ethers can
be determined from the pyrolysis of these products. With ethers the usual
decomposition products are carbonyl compounds and hydrocarbons: 7
R· CH 2 • CH 2 0 . CH 2 CH 2 R ~ RCH 2 . CH=O + R· CH 2 . CH 3
(5) Some special methods of analysis for anionic starch ethers include:
(i) Determination of alkoxyl groups by quantitative vapour-phase infra-
red spectroscopy of alkyl iodides. This method 3 0 seems to give good
results in the determination of methoxyl and ethoxyl groups but
has found no wide application.
(ii) Recently 31 a method of identification has been described for
methyl, hydroxyethyl and hydroxypropyl cellulose derivatives by
thermal degradation of the ethers in a time-of-flight mass
spectrometer.
(b) Analysis of anionic starch ethers, e.g. the reaction products of starch and
monochloro acetic acid and propane sultone
(i) Carboxymethyl starch. The quantitative determination of the degree
of substitution of carboxymethyl starches with low degree of substitution
198 EXAMINATION AND ANALYSIS OF STARCH
(d) The definition of the degree of substitution (DS) and molar substitution
(MS)
The two names are defined by Bollenback 66 as follows: the degree of
substitution (DS) is a measure of the substitution of an anhydro glucose
unit without regard to the molecular size of the substituent. In fact it gives
the number of hydroxyl groups in an anhydroglucose unit (AGU) that
has been substituted.
The molar substitution (MS) however is a measure of the number of
moles of reagent which have been introduced per anhydroglucose unit
and are determined separately in the analysis. It follows that MS ;;::: DS.
In the preparation of derivatives with monofunctional reagents such as,
alkyl or aralkyl chlorides, monochloro acetic acid, propane sultone, etc.,
only one mole of reagent reacts with a hydroxyl-group, but in the prepara-
tion of hydroxylalkyl ethers, the hydroxyl group of the derivative side
chain acts in competition for the original OR-groups of the AGU and
thus polymerisation in the side chain may take place. In the Zeisel deter-
mination each alkoxy group is determined and thus for each OR group
THE ANALYSIS OF STARCH DERIVATIVES 199
substituted, more than one alkoxy group may be found. What normally is
described as a DS is in fact mostly a MS because the determination of the
DS in hydroxy alkyl derivatives is often a very tedious problem.
After one has determined the type of substituent and the degree of sub-
stitution of starch derivatives, the next step may be the substituent groups
distribution (SGD) in these products. Much work has been done on SGD
of cellulose derivatives but until now very little on starch derivatives and
in both cases, for logical reasons, only on the ethers. The scheme normally
followed for the ethers is to hydrolyse the polysaccharide derivative in
question with sulphuric acid, neutralise with Ba(OHh or BaC0 3 and
separate the different constituents of the hydrolysate by means of selective
extraction, paper, thin layer, column or gas chromatography.
From the amount of isomer the distribution of groups can be calculated.
Because of the hydrolysis step normally required it is clear that this method
is unfit for esters and has only been used for ethers in this form. For esters
indirect methods for studying the distribution of substituents have to be
used which, as a rule, are much less accurate.
The following cellulose derivatives have been investigated for substituent
group distribution.
TABLE 7.1
Substituent group distribution in cellulose ethers
Ratio of substituents
Reagent Refer-
DS Remarks
ence
2-0 3-0 6-0
Ratio of substituents
Refer-
Reagent DS Remarks
ence
2-0 3-0 6-0
Acetic anhydride 56
0·4-0·66 57 Substitution
mainly at C-6
Carbon disulphide+ KOH 58 No definite
conclusion
0'31-0·41 59 Substitution
mainly at C-6
60 Substitution
mainly at C-6
THE ANALYSIS OF STARCH DERIVATIVES 201
7.4 SUMMARY
Although some progress has been made in the last two decades, as yet, in
most, cases it is not possible to predict the position of the hydroxyl group
that will mainly be substituted in preparing derivatives of cellulose and
starch. The reason for this is, that there are several factors which influence
the direction of the substitution, and some of these may work in the same
direction or contrary.
Croon found in 1957 that the distribution of substituents in cellulose is
governed by:
In later years some rules for the interaction of specific groups in cellulose
were found, of which the main are:
REFERENCES
1. Wandel, M. and Tengler, R., Gurnrni, Asbest, Kunststofle, 1966, 19, 141.
2. Hekeler, W., Kunststoffe, 1968,58, 165.
3. Freudenberg, K. and Harder, M., Ann., 1923,433,230.
4. Whistler, R. L. and Jeanes, A., Anal. Chern., 1943, 15, 317.
5. Cramer, F. B., Gardner, T. S. and Purves, C. B., Anal. Chern., 1943, 15, 319.
6. van der Bij, J. R. and Vogel, W. F., Die Starke, 1962, 14, 113.
7. King, W. D. and Stanonis, D. J., Tappi, 1969,52,465.
8. McCready, R. M., Swenson, H. A. and Maclay, W. D., Anal. Chern., 1946, 18, 290.
9. Cheung, H. c., Benjamin, C. and Weill, C. Edwin, Anal. Chern., 1960,32, 818.
10. Blechinger, F., Adhaesion, 1958,2, 989.
11. Zeisel, S., Monatsh., 1885,6,989.
12. Viebock, F. and Schwappach, A., Ber., 1930,63,2818.
13. Viebock, F. and Brecher, C., Ber., 1930,63, 3207.
14. Gran, G., Svensk Papperst., 1953,56,202.
15. Morgan, P. W., Anal. Chern., 1946, 18, 500.
16. Kratzl, K. and Gruber, K., Monatsh., 1958,89, 618.
17. Ehrenberger, F., Z. anal. Chern., 1965,210,424.
18. Vertalier, S. and Martin, F., Chirnie anal., 1958,40, 80.
19. Cobler, J. G., Samsel, E. P. and Beaver, G. H., Talanta, 1962,9, 1527.
20. Sporek, F. and Danyi, M. D., Anal. Chern., 1962,34, 1527.
21. van der Bij, J. R., Die Starke, 1967, 19, 256.
22. Fukuda, M., Mikrochirn. Acta, 1960,448.
23. McCloskey, C. M., Adv. Carbohyd. Chern., 1957, 12, 137.
24. Gushes, E. L. and Stevens, P. G., J. Arn. Chern. Soc., 1933,55, 378.
25. Mathers, A. P. and Pro, M. J., Anal. Chern., 1955,27, 1662.
26. Tai, H., Powers, R. M. and Protzman, T. F., Anal. Chern., 1964,36, 108.
27. Jacin, H. and Slanski, J. M., Anal. Chern., 1970,42, 801.
28. Lemieux, R. U. and Purves, C. B., Can. J. Res., 1947, 25B, 485.
29. Johnson, D. P., Anal. Chern., 1969,41, 859.
30. Anderson, D. M. W. and Duncan, J. L., Talanta, 1960,7, 1; 1961,8,241.
31. Harless, H. R. and Anderson, R. L., Textile Res. J., 1970,40,448.
32. Eyler, R. W., Klug, E. D. and Diephuis, F., Anal. Chern., 1947, 19,24.
33. Wilson, K., Svensk Papperst., 1956,59,218; 1960,63, 714.
34. Husemann, E., Makrornol. Chern., 1960,41,208.
35. Mehltretter, C. L., Weakley, F. B., Ashby, M. Louise, Herlocker, D. W. and Rist,
C. E., Tappi, 1963,46,506.
36. Lambert, J. M., J. Colloid Sci., 1947,2,479.
37. Croon, I. and Lindberg, B., Acta Chern. Scand., 1957, 11, 192; Svensk Papperst.,
1957,60, 843.
38. Croon, I., Lindberg, B. and Ros, A., Svensk Papperst., 1958,61, 35.
39. Croon, I., Svensk Papperst., 1958,61,919.
40. Croon, I. and Flamm, E., Svensk Papperst., 1958,61,963.
41. Croon, I. and Lindberg, B., Svensk Papperst., 1956,59, 794.
42. Brownell, H. H. and Purves, C. P., Can. J. Chern., 1957,35,677.
204 EXAMINATION AND ANALYSIS OF STARCH
ADDITIONAL REFERENCES
Alkoxyl determination
Anderson, D. M. W. and Duncan, J. L., Chern. & Ind., 1959,457; C.A., 54, 2093a.
Anderson, D. M. W. and Duncan, J. L., Talanta, 1960,7, 70; C.A., 55, 7139f.
Anderson, D. M. W. and Duncan, J. L., Talanta, 1961,8,1; C.A., 55, 7139h.
Anderson, D. M. W. and Duncan, J. L., Talanta, 1961,8,241; C.A., 56, 2oo3c.
Anderson, D. M. W., Herbich, M. A. and Zaidi, S. S. H., Talanta, 1962,9,620; C.A.,
57, 13185h.
Anderson, D. M. W. and Duncan, J. L., Talanta, 1962,9, 661; C.A., 57, 13185i.
Anderson, D. M. W., Garbutt, S. and Zaidi, S. S. H., Anal. Chirn. Acta, 1963,29,39;
C.A., 59, 700Oc.
Anderson, D. M. W., Duncan, J. L., Herbich, M. A. and Zaidi, S. S. H., Analyst, 1963,
88, 353; C.A., 59, 5769g.
Anderson, D. M. W. and Zaidi, S. S. H., Talanta, 1963, 10, 691; C.A., 59, 3318c.
Anderson, D. M. W. and Zaidi, S. S. H., Talanta, 1963, 10, 1235; C.A., 60, 25h.
THE ANALYSIS OF STARCH DERIVATIVES 205
Araki, S., Suzuki, S. and Kitano, M., Bunseki Kagaku, 1969, 18, 608; C.A., 71, 108917j.
Arlt, H. G. and Sarkanen, K., Anal. Chern., 1956,28, 1502; CA., 50, 16203b.
Belcher, R., Fildes, J. E. and Nutten, A. J., Anal. Chirn. Acta, 1955,13, 16; CA., 50,
1528g.
Belcher, R., Bahtty, M. K. and West, T. S., J. Chern. Soc., 1957,4480; C.A., 52, 1853g.
Bethge, P. O. and Carlson, O. T., Anal. Chirn. Acta, 1956, 15, 279; C.A., 51, 7064b.
Billitzer, A. W., Lab. Practice, 1958,7,289; C.A., 54, 24129d.
Bonderevskaya, E. A., Syavtsillo, S. V. and Potsepkina, R. N., Inst. Geokhirn. Analit.
Khirn., 1963, 13, 178; C.A., 59, 9329a.
Boxall, L. M., Greenwood, C. T. and Muir, D. D., Lab. Practice, 1974,23, 67; C.A.,
80,78142u.
Budesinsky, B. and Korbl, J., Mikrochirn. Acta, 1960,369; CA., 55, 19615d.
Bylund, M., Donetzhuber, A. and Magnusson, F., Svensk Papperst., 1970, 73, 521;
74,9434e.
Campiglio, A., Farrnaco Ed. Prat., 1967,22,688; C.A., 68, 65494n.
Campiglio, A., Farrnaco Ed. Prat., 1969,24,787; C.A., 72, 38677a.
Casu, B., Gallo, G. G., Reggiani, M. and Vigevani, A., Die Starke, 1968, 20, 387;
C.A., 70, 39073w.
Cheng, F. W., Microchern. J., 1965,9,270; C.A., 64, 5755g.
Chumachenko, M. N. and Kolesnik, L. V., Izv. Akad. Nauk. SSSR Ser. Khirn., 1968,
1874; C.A., 69, 113366s.
Chumachenko, M. N. and Kolesnik, L. V., Izv. Akad. Nauk. SSSR Ser. Khirn., 1971,
2090; C.A., 76, 30442g.
Clark, E. P., Anal. Chern., 1938, 10, 677; C.A., 33, 495b.
Clark, E. P., J. Ass. Off. Agr. Chern., 1939,22,622; C.A., 33,9196 9 •
Clemett, C. J., Anal. Chern., 1973,45, 186; C.A., 78, 59921q.
Cobler, J. G., Samsel, E. P. and Beaver, G. H., Talanta, 1962,9,473; C.A., 57, 5307a.
Cooke, L. M. and Hibbert, H., Anal. Chern., 1943, 15, 24; C.A., 37, 11003.
Croessmann, F., Klaus, W., Mergenthaler, E. and Souci, S. W., Z. Lebensrn. Unters.
Forsch., 1964, 125, 413; C.A., 62, 4517f.
Croon, I. and Manley, R. S. J., Methods in Carbohyd. Chern., 1963,3,277; C.A., 58,
12755e.
Cundiff, R. H. and Markunas, P. c., Anal. Chern., 1961,33, 1028; C.A., 55, 24392d.
Cundiff, R. H., Chern. Eng. News, 1961, April 3, 49.
De Belder, A. N., Persson, A. and Markstrom, S., Die Starke, 1972,24,361; C.A., 78,
113025r.
Easterbrook, W. C. and Hamilton, J. B., Analyst, 1953,78, 551; C.A., 47, 12131a.
Ehrenberger, F., Z. Anal. Chern., 1965,210,424; C.A., 63, 14044a.
Ehrlich-Rogozinski, S. and Patchornik, A., Anal. Chern., 1964, 36, 840; C.A., 60,
15144d.
Elek, A., Anal. Chern., 1939, 11, 174; C.A., 33, 2845 2 •
Elek, A., Organic Analysis I, 1953, 67.
Etienne, H., Ind. Chirn. BeIge, 1957,22, 1157, 1287.
Favorskaya, I. A. and Auvinen, E. M., Vestnik Leningrad Univ., 1959, 14, 119; C.A.,
54,8428b.
Franzen, F., Hegeman, W. and Disse, W., Mikrochirn. Acta, 1952,277; C.A., 46, 9474d.
Franzen, F., Disse, W. and Eysell, K., Mikrochirn. Acta, 1953,44; C.A., 47, 9862b.
Freck, J. A. and Powell, E. L., Cereal Science Today, 1968, 167.
Fukuda, M., Yakugaku Zasshi, 1957,77, 934; C.A., 51, 16206h.
Fukuda, M., Yakugaku Zasshi, 1958,78, 83; C.A., 52, 6066c.
Fukuda, M., Yakugaku Zasshi, 1958,78, 101; C.A., 52, 6066e.
Fukuda, M., Bunseki Kagaku, 1959,8,387; CA., 55, 18451f.
Fukuda, M., Bunseki Kagaku, 1959, 8, 390; C.A., 55, 18451g.
206 EXAMINATION AND ANALYSIS OF STARCH
Klimova, V. A. andZabrodina, K. S.,Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1963, 109; C.A., 59, 1094d.
Klimova, V. A., Zabrodina, K. S. and Shitikova, N. L., Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1965,
1288; C.A., 63, 13122e.
Klimova, V. A. and Zabrodina, K. S., Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1970,2398; C.A., 74,
119884j.
Kolesnik, L. V., Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1969,2107; C.A., 72, 38678b.
Kozlov, M. P. and Ermilova, I. I., Zh. Analit. Khim., 1965,20,755; C.A., 63, 10686c.
Kratzl, K. and Gruber, K., Monatsh., 1958,89,618; C.A., 53, 12954e.
Kretz, R., Z. Anal. Chem., 1960, 176, 421; C.A., 55, 5243b.
Langejan, M., Pharm. Weekbl., 1957,92,667; C.A., 52, 659h.
Lebedeva, A. I. and Pisarenko, E. S., Zh. Analit. Khim., 1962, 17, 636; C.A., 58, 578e.
Lebedeva, A. I. and Pisarenko, E. S., Zh. Analit. Khim., 1963, 18, 892; C.A., 59, 9329f.
Lebedeva, A. I. and Pisarenko, E. S., Zh. Analit. Khim., 1965,20, 630; C.A., 63, 5886g.
Lortz, H. J., Anal. Chem., 1956,28,892; C.A., 50, 10432h.
Makens, R. F., Lothringer, R. L. and Donia, R. A., Anal. Chem., 1959, 31, 1265;
C.A., 54, 1183d.
Mathers, A. P. and Pro, M. J., Anal. Chem., 1955,27,1662; C.A., 50, 4724c.
Mergenthaler, E., Souci, S. W. and Croessmann, F., Z. Lebensm. Unters. Forsch., 1965,
126, 173; C.A., 62, 13760f.
Metz, W., Fresenius' Z. Anal. Chem., 1967,232, 82; C.A., 68, 26772g.
Miller, D. L., Samsel, E. P. and Cobler, J. G., Anal. Chem., 1961,33,677; C.A., 56,
8918c.
Mitsui, T., Microchem. J. Symp. Ser., 1962, 2, 571; C.A., 58, 9632d.
Mitsui, T. and Kitamura, Y., Microchem. J. Symp. Ser., 1963,7, 141; C.A., 59, 13354h.
Morgan, P. W., Anal. Chem., 1946, 18, 500; C.A., 40, 6366 8 •
Muller, Th. E. and Alexander, W. J., J. Appl. Polymer Sci., 1966, 10, 1285; C.A., 65,
18824g.
Obruba, K., Mikrochim. Acta, 1961, 801; C.A., 56, 10914i.
Obruba, K., Kucerova, E. and Jurecek, M., Mikrochim. Acta, 1964, 44; C.A., 61,
16158c.
Peniston, Q. P. and Hibbert, H., Paper Trade J., 1939,109,46; C.A., 34, 2591 5 .
Phillips, M. and Goss, M. J., J. Ass. Olfic. Agr. Chem., 1937,20,292; C.A., 31,5297 7 •
Pietrogrande, A., Ichnoanal. Acta, 1964, 891; C.A., 61, 13875b.
Pietrogrande, A., Mikrochim. Acta, 1966, 1156; C.A., 66, 43525e.
Pietrogrande, A., Ann. Inst. Super Sanita, 1966,2,264; C.A., 66, 72266b.
Pietrogrande, A. and Dalla Fini, G., Mikrochim. Acta, 1971, 14; C.A., 75, 14722u.
Redfarn, C. A. and Newton, D. R., Chem. & Ind., 1952,404; C.A., 46, 9842d.
Samsel, E. P. and McHard, J. A., Anal. Chem., 1942, 14, 750; C.A., 36,6794 9 •
Savage, A. B., Encycl. Polymer. Sci. Techn., 1964,3,459; C.A., 65, 5648d.
Schachter, M. M. and Ma, T. S., Mikrochim. Acta, 1966, 55; C.A., 65, 8006h.
Schwarz, G. W. G., Fresenius' Z. Anal. Chem., 1974, 271, 31.
Shah, N. N., Gobeille, M. F. and Mowery, D. F., Mikrochem. J., 1967, 12,273; C.A.,
67,60808n.
Shlionskaya, M. A. and Nogteva, K. G., Zh. Anal. Khim., 1968, 23, 640; C.A., 69,
20528f.
Siggia, S., Starke, A. C., Garis, J. J. and Stahl, C. R., Anal. Chem., 1958, 30, 115;
C.A., 52, 9957c.
Snijders, C. J., Chem. Weekblad, 1951,47, 74; C.A., 46, 5348d.
Sobue, H., Hatano, A. and Arai, T., J. Soc. Textile Cellulose Ind. Japan, 1959, 15, 21;
C.A., 53, 6909a.
Souci, S. W., Croessmann, F. and Mergenthaler, F., Z. Lebensm. Unters. Forsch., 1964,
125,247; C.A., 62, 2173a.
Sporek, K. F. and Danyi, M. D., Anal. Chem., 1962.34, 1527; C.A., 58, 661g.
208 EXAMINATION AND ANALYSIS OF STARCH
Stahl, H. and McNaught, R. P., Cereal Chem., 1970,47,345; C.A., 79, 41165d.
Stanonis, D. J., Encycl. Polymer Sci. Techn., 1964,3,541; C.A., 65, 5648d.
Stephen, W. I., Proc. Intern. Symp. Microchem. Birmingham Univ., 1958, 163; C.A., 54,
19309g.
Steyermark, A, Anal. Chem., 1948,20,368; C.A., 42, 6273e.
Steyermark, A. and Loeschauer, E. E., J. Ass. Offic. Agr. Chem., 1954,37,433; C.A.,
48,9273a.
Steyermark, A. et al., Anal. Chem., 1956,28, 112; C.A., 50, 4559h.
Steyermark, A, J. Ass. Offic. Agr. Chem., 1955,38,367; C.A., 49, 10129c.
Steyermark, A., J. Ass. Offic. Agr. Chem., 1956, 39, 401; C.A., 50, 9235b.
Tai, H., Powers, R. M. and Protzman, T. F., Anal. Chem., 1964,36,108; C.A., 60, 7014c.
Takiura, K., Takino, Y. and Harada, S., J. Pharm. Soc. Japan, 1956,76,1328; C.A., 51,
2474g.
Thamm, E., Par/uem. Kosmetik, 1962,43,285; C.A., 57, 14438g.
Trutnovsky, H. F., Sakla, A. B. and Haller, P., Mikrochim. Acta, 1970, 1277; C.A., 74,
119885k.
Van der Bij, J. R., Die Starke, 1967, 19,258; C.A., 67, 101225z.
Veeera, M., Gasparic, J. and Spevak, A, Chem. List, 1957,51, 1553; C.A., 52, 1085h.
Vecera, M. and Spevak, A., Chem. List, 1958,52, 1520; C.A., 52, 19712b.
Vecera, M. and Spevak, A, Coil. Czechoslov. Chem. Comm., 1959,24,413; C.A., 53,
ll111c.
VertaIier, S. and Martin, F., Chim. Anal., 1958, 40, 80; C.A., 52, 8849c.
Vieboeck, F. and Schwappach, A., Berichte, 1930,63,2818; C.A., 25, 474.
Vieboeck, F. and Brechner, C., Berichte, 1930,63,3207; C.A., 25, 896.
VycudiIik, W. and Machata, G., Chromatographia, 1973,6, 384; C.A., 79, 147533r.
Ware, G. M., Mikrochemie, 1930,2,352; C.A., 25,896.
Waszeciak, P. and Nadeau, H. G., Anal. Chem., 1964,36,764; C.A., 61, 2960b.
White, E. P., Anal. Chem., 1944, 16, 207; C.A., 38, 1980 4 •
Yorston, F. H. and Pichette, A. H., Pulp Paper Mag. Can., 1949,50,114; C.A., 44, 4247i.
Zeisel, S., Sitzungsber. d.K.Akad.d. Wiss., 1885,92, 1431.
Zeisel, S., Monatsh., 1885, 6, 989.
Zeisel, S., Monatsh., 1886,7,406.
Ermelenko, I. N. and Chirkova, G. N., Zh. Analit. Khirn., 1963, 18, 994; C.A., 59,
14580b.
Eyler, R. W., Klug, E. D. and Diephuis, F., Anal. Chern., 1947, 19,24; C.A., 41, 1837e.
Fahmy, Y. A. and Mansour, 0., Indian Pulp Paper, 1966,20,535; C.A., 65, 5646c.
Finkelstein, M. Z., Timokhin, I. M. and Mukhamedov, Kh. U., Izvest. Vysshikh. Asheb.
Zave denii. Neft i. Gaz., 1958,45; C.A., 53, 16809i.
Ibid., Khirn. Nauka i Prom., 1959,4,677; C.A., 54, 8654d.
Francis, C. Y., Anal. Chern., 1953,25,941; C.A., 47, 9865i.
Franzon, 0., Samuelson, 0., Bodforss, B. and Ehn, E., Svensk Papperst., 1957,60,706;
C.A., 52, 9589i.
Fujii, S. and Harada, M., Eisei Shikenjo Hokoku, 1958,75,471; C.A., 52, 18933g.
Fujii, S. and Harada, M., Eisei Shikenjo Hokoku, 1959,77,153; C.A., 55, 10878a.
Ghosh, K. G., Raman, M. R., Dey, A. N. and Balakrishna, K J., J. Sci. and Ind. Res.
(India), 1960, 19, B323; C.A., 55, 6858d.
Ghosh, K G. and Balakrishna, K. J., J. Sci. and Ind. Res. (India), 1962, 21, B194;
C.A., 57, 3663c.
Graham, H. D., J. Dairy Sci., 1972,55,42; C.A., 76, 57825w.
Green, J. W., Methods in Carbohyd. Chern., 1963,3,322; C.A., 58, 12755f.
Hansi, W., Klaus, W. and Mercator, K, Tenside, 1968, 5, 281; C.A., 70, 5295e.
Heymann, E. and Rabinov, G., Trans. Faraday Soc., 1942,38,209; C.A., 36,7311 6 •
Horovic, A. and Djordjevic, B., Glasnik. Khern. Drushtva Beograd, 1959, 22, 509;
C.A., 56, 3692i.
Hostomsky, J., Tolgyessy, J. and Krivan, Y., Chern. Zvesti., 1960, 14, 290; C.A., 54,
25787g.
Ikeda, S. and Takeichi, K., Denpun Kogyo Gakkaishi, 1961,9,45; C.A., 58, 1623d.
Ikeda, S., Denpun Kogyo Gakkaishi, 1963, 10, 74; C.A., 63, 5881h.
Khundkar, M. H. and Bhattacharjee, A. K, Chemist. Analyst, 1964,53,109; C.A., 62,
1835g.
Klug, E. D., Encycl. Polymer Sci. Techn., 1964,3,520; C.A., 65, 5648d.
Kunovits, G. and Hoffmann, F., Seifen, Dele, Fette, Wachse, 1972, 98,250; C.A., 77,
50394s.
Lejaren, A. H. and Pascu, E., Textile Res. J., 16, 390; C.A., 40,6814 3 •
Mattison, M. F. and Legendre, K. A., Anal. Chern., 1952,24, 1942; C.A., 47, 3598h.
Matyus, S., Magy Textiltechn., 1965, 17, 568; C.A., 64, 14333e.
McKillican, M. E. and Purves, C. B., Can. J. Chern., 1954,32,312; C.A., 48, 9094c.
Mukhopadhyay, S. and Mittra, B. Ch., Anal. Chern., 1973,45,1775; C.A., 79, 93631a.
Nabar, G. M. and Shenai, Y. A., J. Appl. Polyrn. Sci., 1970, 14, 1215; C.A., 73, 46841k.
Nemitz, G., Die Starke, 1962, 14,276; C.A., 58, 1623a.
Norstedt, I. and Samuelson, 0., Svensk Papperst., 1966, 69, 417; C.A., 65, 15655f.
Pacault, A. and Bouttemy, M., Bull. Soc. Chirn. France, 1950,663; C.A., 45, 1341i.
Philipp, B., Rheder, W. and Lang, H., das Papier, 1965, 19, 1; C.A., 62, 7991g.
Rebek, M., Baumgartner, H., Wagner, J., Beck, H. and Kirnbauer, A., Monatsh.,
1957,88,956; C.A., 52, 6781g.
Rebek, M. and Beck, H., das Papier, 1958, 12,201; C.A., 52, 14159g.
Rebek, M. and Stiibschen-Kirchner, H., das Papier, 1960, 14, 175; C.A., 54, 16821c.
Rebek, M., Kirnbauer, A. and Semlitsch, M. F. K, das Papier, 1960, 14, 510; C.A., 55,
5941d.
Samuelson, O. and Wennerblom, A., Svensk Papperst., 1955,58,713; C.A., 51, 18583f.
Samuelson, O. and Wikstrom, L. A., Svensk Papperst., 1960,63,543; C.A., 55, 981g.
Samuelson, O. and Tornell, B., Svensk Papperst., 1961,64,155; C.A., 55, 14904f.
Samuelson, O. and Tornell, B., Svensk Papperst., 1961,64,198; C.A., 55, 14904h.
Samuelson, 0., Methods in Carbohyd. Chern., 1963, 3, 31; C.A., 58, 12754g.
Schwenkedel, S., Textil Praxis, 1958, 13, 1268; C.A., 54, 11488e.
210 EXAMINATION AND ANALYSIS OF STARCH
Simionescu, C. and Asandei, N., Chim. Anal., 1958,40,204; C.A., 52, 19121e.
Sjostrom, E. and Haglund, P., Svensk Papperst., 1961,64,438; C.A., 55, 21576h.
Slavik, I., Pasteka, M. and Kucerova, M., Svensk Papperst., 1967,70,229; C.A., 67,
33967g.
Ibid., Svensk Papperst., 1967,70,365; C.A., 67, 91827u.
Slavik, I. and Kucerova, M., Faser/orsch. Textiltech., 1966, 17, 26; C.A., 64, 17849g.
Sloan, J. W., Mehltretter, C. L. and Senti, F. R., J. Chem. Eng. Data, 1962, 7, 156;
C.A., 57, 2479d.
Sobue, H., Okubo, M. and Kaunami, S., J. Chem. Soc. Japan, 1954,57,247; C.A., 49,
2727i.
Tomita, S. and Terajima, K., Kogyo Kagaku Zasshi, 1969, 72, 532; C.A., 71, 81680n.
Unruh, C. c., McGee, P. A., Fowler, W. F. and Kenyon, W.O., J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1947,69,349; C.A., 41, 2891b.
Usmanov, Kh. U. and Perlina, R. V., Uzbeksk. Khim. Zh., 1961,22; C.A., 56, 15700d.
Vink, H., Makromol. Chem., 1969, 122,271; C.A., 70, 107642h.
Weber, O. H., J. prakt. Chem., 1941,158,33; C.A., 36,653 5 •
Wilson, K., Svensk Papperst., 1948, 51, 45; C.A., 42, 6535f.
Wilson, K., Svensk Papperst., 1956,59,218; C.A., 51, 15118c.
Wilson, K., Svensk Papperst., 1960, 63, 714; C.A., 55, 5942c.
Wilson, K., Svensk Papperst., 1966,69, 386; C.A., 65, 12401b.
Wilson, K. and Mandel, J., Tappi, 1961,44, 131; C.A., 55, 14903i.
Zaalberg Van Zelst, E. F., Plastica, 1949,2, 360; C.A., 44, 3252h.
Zubrev, N. I., Lure, I. S. and Lukyanov, A. B., Sakh. Prom., 1973, 68; C.A., 80, 16734e.
Substituent group distribution in cellulose and starch
Adams, G. A. and Castagne, A. E., Can. J. Res., 1949,27, B924; C.A., 44, 3252g.
Berry, J. W., Deutschman, A. J. and Evans, J. P., J. Org. Chem., 1964,29,2619; C.A.,
61, 12069h.
Bines, B. J. and Whelan, W. J., J. Chem. Soc., 1962,4232; C.A., 58, 2496g.
Bjorndal, H., Lindberg, B. and Rosell, K. G., J. Polymer Science, 1972, 523; C.A., 76,
87375s.
Bollenback, G. N., Golik, R. S. and Parrish, F. W., Cereal Chem., 1969,46,304; C.A.,
71,40541z.
Bose, J. L., J. Appl. Polymer Sci., 1971, 15,2999; C.A., 76, 101421n.
Brownell, H. H. and Purves, C. B., Can. J. Chem., 1957,35,677; C.A., 52, 271f.
Bullock, A. L., Rowland, S. P. and Cirino, V. 0., Textile Res. J., 1970,40,313; C.A., 73,
36372u.
Croon, I. and Lindberg, B., Svensk Popperst., 1956,59, 794; C.A., 51, 17769i.
Croon, I. and Lindberg, B., Svensk Papperst., 1957,60, 82; C.A., 52, 719f.
Croon, I. and Lindberg, B., Svensk Papperst., 1957,60,843; C.A., 52, 9588g.
Croon, I., Lindberg, B. and Ros, A., Svensk Papperst., 1958,61,35; C.A., 52, 21066a.
Croon, I., Svensk Papperst., 1958,61,919; C.A., 53, 22910d.
Croon, I. and Flamm, E., Svensk Papperst., 1958, 61, 963; C.A., 54, 2735g.
Croon, I., Svensk Papperst., 1959,62,700; C.A., 54, 3941d.
Croon, I. and Purves, C. B., Svensk Popperst., 1959,62, 876; C.A., 54, 8071f.
Croon, I., Svensk Papperst., 1960, 63, 247; C.A., 54, 15925h.
Croon, I. and Lindberg, B., Acta Chem. Scond., 1957, 11, 192; C.A., 52, 9589b.
Croon, I., Acta Chem. Scand., 1959, 13, 1235; C.A., 55, 27077a.
Croon, I. and Manley, R. S. J., Methods in Carbohyd. Chem., 1963,3,280; C.A., 58,
12755e.
De Belder, A. N. and Norrman, B., Carbohyd. Res., 1968,8, 1; C.A., 69, 106988t.
De Belder, A. N. and Norrman, B., Carbohyd. Res., 1969, 10, 391; C.A., 71, 70846v.
Doane, W. M., Russell, C. R. and Rist, C. E., Die Stiirke, 1965,17,176; C.A., 63, 8595b.
THE ANALYSIS OF STARCH DERIVATIVES 211
Doane, W. M., Smith, N. L., Russell, C. R. and Rist, C. E., Ibid., 225; C.A., 63, 10157g.
Dunbrant, S. and Samuelson, 0., Tappi, 1963,46, 520; C.A., 59, 15474e.
Ezra, G. and Zilkha, A., J. Macromol. Sci. Chem., 1969,3, 1589; C.A., 71, 126269d.
Fink, A. L. and Hay, G. W., Can. J. Chem., 1969,47,845; C.A., 70, 68660r.
Gardner, T. S. and Purves, C. B., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1942,64,1539; C.A., 36, 5343 6 •
Haworth, S., Roberts, J. G. and Sagar, B. F., Carbohyd. Res., 1969, 9, 491; C.A., 71,
13288r.
Haworth, S., Jones, D. M., Roberts, J. G. and Sagar, B. F., Carbohyd. Res., 1969, 10, 1;
C.A., 71, 40440r.
Hoiness, D. E., Wade, C. P. and Rowland, S. P., Can. J. Chem., 1968,46,667; C.A., 68,
11488d.
Husemann, E., Reinhardt, M. and Kafka, M., Makromol. Chem., 1960, 41, 184; C.A.,
55, 27929b.
Husemann, E. and Kafka, M., Makromol. Chem., 1960,41,208; C.A., 55, 27929f.
Jullander, I., das Papier, 1965, 19, 166.
Konishi, H., Sen. i. Gakkaishi, 1961, 17,1175; C.A., 56, 11836a.
Kubik, J. and Talian, I., Petrochimia, 1971, 11, 8.
Lenz, R. W., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1960,82,182; C.A., 54, 18372g.
Lindberg, A., Svensk Papperst., 1974,77,286; C.A., 80, 137748s.
Lukanoff, T., Faser/orsch. Textiltech., 1965, 16, 540 ; C.A., 64, 9935t.
Mahoney, J. F. and Purves, C. B., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1942,64,9; C.A., 36, 1175 6 •
Mahoney, J. F. and Purves, C. B., Ibid., 1942, 64, 15; C.A., 36,1176 1 .
Neely, W. Brock, Nott, J. and Roberts, C. B., Anal. Chem., 1962,34,1423; C.A., 57,
15392f.
Norrman, B., Acta Chem. Scand., 1968,22, 1381; C.A., 70, 4470w.
Philipp, B. and Chung-Hung, Chu, Faser/orsch. Texliltech., 1965, 16, 244; C.A., 63.
5886b.
Purves, C. B., Chem. Can., 1960, 12, 25; C.A., 59, 15474d.
Ramnas, O. and Samuelson, 0., Svensk Papperst., 1968,71, 674; C.A., 70, 59047u.
Roberts, E. J. and Rowland, S. P., Carbohyd. Res., 1967,5,1; C.A., 67, 117152a.
Can. J. Chem., 1967, 45, 261; C.A., 66, 55691 u.
Roberts, E. J. and Rowland, S. P., Can. J. Chem., 1969,47, 1571; C.A., 71, 4655f
Rowland, S. P., Chem. Eng. News., 1966, Jan. 31, 30.
Rowland, S. P., Cirino, V. O. and Bullock, A. L., Can. J. Chem., 1966,44, 1051; C. A.,
64,17850h.
Spurlin, H. M., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1939,61,2222; C.A., 33, 8400 9 •
Srivastava, H. C. and Ramalingam, K. V., Die Starke, 1967, 19,295; C.A., 67, 101230p.
Stratta, J., Tappi, 1963, 46, 717; C.A., 60, 7018c.
Timell, T., Svensk Papperst., 1948,51, 52; C.A., 42, 8466g.
Timell, T., Svensk. Kem. Tid., 1950, 62, 49; C.A., 44, 6119g.
Timell, T., Ibid., 1950,62,129; C.A., 44, l1087d.
Timell, T. E., Svensk Papperst., 1952,55,649; C.A., 48, 10336h.
Timell, T. E. and Spurlin, H. M., Ibid., 1952,55, 700; C.A., 48, 10337c.
Treiber, E., das Papier, 1970, 24, 901.
Usov, A. I., Kurnetsova, Z. I. and Arkhipova, V. S., Vysokomol. Soedin. Ser. B., 1973,
15, 147; C.A., 79, 32804n.
Wirick, M. G., J. Polym. Sci. AI., 1968,6,1705; C.A., 69, 3818h.
Yoshimura, S., Sen. i. Gakkaishi., 1965,21,560; C.A., 64, 3828g.
Balandina, V. A. and Novikova, E. M., Plasticheskie Massy., 1960, 53; C.A., 55,
19307i.
Bischoff, K. H. and Linow, K. J., Faser/orsch. Textiltech., 1960, 11, 245; C.A., 54,
18953e.
Bockman, C. D., Appl. Spectroscopy, 1961, 15, 84; C.A., 56, 6196g.
Bockman, C. D., Appl. Spectroscopy, 1961, 15, 85; C.A., 56, 10422d.
Budinsky, B., Chern. Listy, 1956,50,1936; C.A., 51, 4213d.
Budinsky, B., Collect. Czechoslov. Chern. Cornrnuns., 1957,22, 1440; C.A., 52, 7945c.
Chun, Ku, Hua Hsueh Tung Pao, 1965, 509; C.A., 64, 9935a.
Cramer, F. B., Gardner, T. S. and Purves, C. B., Anal. Chern., 1943, 15, 319; C.A., 37,
40328.
Dumazert, C. and Senequier, R., Bull. Soc. Pharrn. Marseille, 1960,9,235; C.A., 56,
5403i.
Dyer, E. and Williams, H. D., Tappi, 1957, 40, 14; C.A., 51, 4703b.
Eberstadt, diss. Heidelberg, 1909.
Emelin, E. A. and Smyslova, N. F., Zavodsk. Lab., 1966, 32, 280; C.A., 64, 17849c.
Franz, J., Plaste u. Kautschuk, 1960,7,493; C.A., 56, 4999i.
Freudenberg, K., Ann., 1923, 433, 230.
Frohwein, Y. Z., Israel J. Chern., 1964,2,57; C.A., 61, 9657b.
Garetto, G. and Ruffoni, A., Anal. Chern., 1955,27,400; C.A., 49, 8596c.
Genung, L. B. and Mallatt, R. C., Anal. Chern., 1941, 13, 369; C.A., 35,5308 8.
Genung, L. B., Anal. Chern., 1950, 22, 401; C.A., 44, 6121i.
Genung, L. B. et al., Anal. Chern., 1952,24,400; C.A., 46, 4789i.
Gore, T. S. and Gupte, S. S., Mikrochirn. Acta, 1962,486; C.A., 57, 52d.
HekeIer, W., Kunststoffe, 1968,58,365; C.A., 69, 60115a.
Huchette, M., Die Starke, 1963,15,275; C.A., 60, 752f.
Hurtubise, F. G., Tappi, 1962, 45, 460; C.A., 60, 5731e.
Inglis, A. S., Mikrochirn. Acta, 1958,228; C.A., 53, 8944e.
Inglis, A. S., Treatise Anal. Chern., 1971, 14, 161; C.A., 75, 104932n.
Kainz, G., Z. Anal. Chern., 1959, 166, 32; C.A., 53, 16606i.
Lemieux, R. U. and Purves, C. B., Can. J. Res., 1947,25, B485; C.A., 42, 843g.
Lipparini, L. and Garutti, M. A., Quad. Merceol., 1967,51,35; C.A., 67, 65675b.
MaIm, C. J., Nadeau, G. F. and Genung, L. B., Anal. Chern., 1942, 14,292; C.A., 36,
2716 4 .
MaIm, C. J., Genung, L. B., Williams, R. F. and Pile, M. A., Anal. Chern., 1944, 16,
501; C.A., 38, 5400 9 •
McComb, D. A. and McCready, R. M., Anal. Chern., 1957,29,819; C.A., 51, 11178c.
Mironov, D. P., Grishin, E. P., Zharkov, V. V. and Pogosov, Yu. L., Plast. Massy.,
1970, 64; C.A., 72, 10l972k.
Muetgeert, J., Hiemstra, P. and Bus, W. C., Die Starke, 1958,10,303; C.A., 53, 9706g.
Murray, T. F., Staud, C. J. and Gray, H. Le B., Anal. Chern., 1931,3,269; C.A., 25,
4701.
Phillips, M., Anal. Chern., 1934, 6, 321; C.A., 28, 6394 2 •
Prey, V., SchindIbauer, H. and Maday, E., Die Starke, 1973, 25, 73; C.A., 79, 712Od.
Redfarn, C. A., Plastics (London), 1958,23,33; C.A., 52, 6781h.
Roberts, H. J., Starch Chern. Technol., 1967, 2, 293; C.A., 69, 28743t.
Roudier, A. and Nick, D., Assoc. Tech. Ind. Papetiere Bull., 1961,269; C.A., 59, 15470i.
Schoeniger, W., Lieb, H. and EI Din Ibrahim, M. G., Mikrochirn. Acta, 1954,96; C.A.,
48, 4369i.
Slavik, I., Pasteka, M. and Kucerova, M., Faser/orsch. Textiltech., 1967, 18, 584; C.A.,
68, 4114Ot.
Steyermark, A. and Loeschiiuer, E. E., J. Ass. Offic. Agr. Chern., 1954,37,433; C.A., 48,
9273e.
THE ANALYSIS OF STARCH DERIVATIVES 213
Oat starch
granules, 13 Quality control, 92
microscopy, 13
Odour, examination for, 121
Opacity of pastes, 125
Orifice-flow viscosity test, 95 Reconstitution, 82
Oven methods for moisture content, Recording Viscometer, 68, 74, 80
135-8 Reflectance, 123
Oxidised starches, 83 Reflectometer, 124
INDEX 219