Chemical System Study Provides Overview of Production and Non-Production Chemicals

IDBC-TS-PRZZZ-C00004
CHEMICAL SYSTEM STUDY 02 Nov 12

BANYU URIP
Rev 2
PROJECT
MPI: Not Classified Page 2 of 17
REVISION MODIFICATION LOG
Revision Section Description
A All Issued for Review
B All Issued for Approval
0 Page 6 Adding Reference List
Page 7 Adding CFF and PPF in the list of Definition
Page 13 Adding Container and Storage Location in to Table 4 and Table 5.

Appendix -
Adding Contingency to the calculation.
1
1 All Re-Issued For Use
Page 5 Correct Water Clarifier specification
Page 8 Revise water specification based on the latest spec agreed with GTG vendor
Page 9 -10 Revise Table 1 as per MCL comments
Page 11 Revise Table 2 as per MCL comments
Page 12 -13 Revise Table 3 as per MCL comments
Appendix-1 Revise Calculation as per MCL comments
2 All Revised based on Vendor’s information and COMPANY’s comment
IDBC-TS-PRZZZ-C00004 Rev 2 CHEMICAL SYSTEM STUDY working.doc

BANYU URIP
Rev 2
PROJECT
Contents
1. 0BINTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................... 4
1.1 Production Chemicals ................................................................................................................. 4

1.2 Non-Production Chemicals ......................................................................................................... 4
2. REFERENCES............................................................................................................................ 6
3. SCOPE........................................................................................................................................ 7
4. DEFINITION................................................................................................................................ 7
5. DESIGN BASIS AND CRITERIA ............................................................................................... 8
5.1 Design Basis ............................................................................................................................... 8

5.2 Design Criteria ............................................................................................................................ 9
6. CHEMICAL CONSUMPTION ..................................................................................................... 9
6.1 Chemical Flammability and Toxicity.......................................................................................... 13
7. CHEMICAL STORAGE ............................................................................................................ 14
Appendices
Appendix 1 – Calculation – Chemical Consumption
Appendix 2 – Simplified PFD
Appendix 3 – Well and Well-pad Design Rates – Table 10-3 Facilities Design Basis
Appendix 4 – Heat and Mass Balance Flow Summary by Case – Table 10-9 Facilities Design Basis
Appendix 5 – Well Fluid Composition – Table 8.1 ~ Table 8.2 and Table 10-4 ~ Table 10-6 Facilities
Design Basis

BANYU URIP
Rev 2
PROJECT
1. INTRODUCTION
0B
This report summarizes chemical injection system in the Banyu Urip Central Field Facility (CFF).
Calculation result in this report is based on chemical dosage injected to a certain point based on
vendor information.
Chemicals vendors approved by COMPANY are contacted to provide required information for the
chemical tank sizing, pump sizing and allocation of the area for the chemical tanks.
Contingency of 10% to the calculation is added to cover any uncertainties information that could have
different dosage between selected vendor and current information from contacted vendor. Chemical
consumption shown here in this report may change subject to dosage used by the selected vendor.
1.1 Production Chemicals

Production chemicals are recommended for product quality and flow assurance, these chemicals
including:
- Pour Point Depressant
 To mitigate the risk of production flowline plugging due to crude oil gelling.
- Demulsifier
 To aid separation process of the oil and water
- Antifoam (Oil Treatment Type)
- H2S Scavenger
 To meet H2S content specification (not exceed 10 ppm), injected during process upset
conditions
- Scale Inhibitor
 To avoid plugging due to uncontrolled scale deposition
- Methanol
 To avoid hydrate formation at choke valves during start-up and blowdown of gas
injection/cap gas production flowlines
- Paraffin / Wax Inhibitor
 Preventing or inhibiting wax formation in export pipeline
1.2 Non-Production Chemicals

Non-Production Chemical for water quality and corrosion control including:
- Corrosion Inhibitor

BANYU URIP
Rev 2
PROJECT
- Oxygen Scavenger
 Injected to achieve a dissolved oxygen level of less than about 20 ppb for adequate
control of corrosion rates in the carbon steel injection water flowlines and well tubing
- Antifoam (Water Treatment Type)
 Injected to control foam formation in the water deaerators
- Antifoam (Amine Treatment Type)
 Injected to remove acid gases from a hydrocarbon process flow such as hydrogen sulfite
and carbon dioxide
- Phosphoric Acid
 Is recommended to install provision points for batch treatment of the Lean Amine Inlet
lines to the AGRU and AGE Absorber
- Glycol pH Control
 To maintain pH of the tri-ethylene glycol (TEG) between 6.5 and 7.5 for proper
performance
- Water Clarifier
 Injected to help to settle out solids suspended in the fluid stream by means of
coagulation ; i.e Iron(III) Chloride and Lime
- Polyelectrolyte
 Is added to water to aid the chemical coagulation process by increasing the speed of
particle charge neutralization and physical combination of small particles into masses
sufficiently large to be filtered out.
- Additional Chemicals for pH Neutralization and Control
 To avoid excessive corrosion of topsides pipework and other process equipment with
which it may come into contact
- Hypochlorite
 To limits the effect of organic material and protection from contact with pathogenic
organism
- Hydrochloric Acid (HCl)
 To clean Hypochlorite generation package system.
- Sodium Hydroxide (NaOH)

BANYU URIP
Rev 2
PROJECT
 To neutralize water from sulfur pelletizer system if direct contact type of pelletizer is
utilized.
 For BFW treatment and Condensate Polishing Unit , bed regeneration
 For Sodium hydroxide injection package of Neutralization Pit, make up of day tank
 For Hypochlorite generation package , chemical cleaning
 For Reverse Osmosis Unit , UF backwashing and RO chemical cleaning
- Sulfuric Acid
 For BFW treatment and Condensate Polishing Unit , bed regeneration
 For Reverse Osmosis Unit , UF backwashing and RO chemical cleaning
 For Sulfuric acid injection package of Neutralization Pit, make up of day tank
- Morpholine
 To maintain pH of BFW system between 8 and 9.5 for HRSGs, SRU WHB & TO WHB
and Package Boiler
- Sodium Metabisulfite
 To remove chlorine to prevent oxidation of membrane at the RO unit
- Calcium Chloride (CaCl2)
 To maintain salt level of WHO drinking water quality
- Sodium Bicarbonate (NaHCO3)
 To maintain salt level of WHO drinking water quality
Most of the chemicals for the Banyu-Urip facility are injected continuously, such as corrosion Inhibitor
due to the corrosive nature of the Banyu Urip produced fluids, and a desire to use carbon steel for the
FWS flow-lines and much of the hydrocarbon and produced water process trains
2. REFERENCES
[1] FACILITY DESIGN BASIS IDBU-ED-BBPDB-000002_Rev 3
[2] HEAT AND MASS BALANCE – NON LICENSOR IDBC-TS-PCCAL-C00011_Rev 0
[3] HEAT AND MASS BALANCE – LICENSOR IDBC-TS-PCCAL-C00013_Rev 1
[4] PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM – NON LICENSOR IDBC-TS-PDPFD-XXXXX_Rev 0
[5] PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM – LICENSOR IDBC-TS-PDPFD-XXXXX_Rev 0

BANYU URIP
Rev 2
PROJECT
[6] EXHIBIT A – SCOPE OF WORK EPC1: PRODUCTION PROCESSING

FACILITIES – B - 3207067
[7] RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CHEMICAL
TREATMENT AND CORROSION MONITORING
OF OIL AND GAS PRODUCTION FACILITIES IDBU-ED-RBPDB-000009_Rev C
[8] SPECIFICATION FOR INITIAL FILL
REQUIREMENTS IDBC-ED-OSPDS-C00011_Rev B
[9] RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CHEMICAL
TREATMENT AND CORROSION MONITORING
OF OIL AND GAS PRODUCTION FACILITIES IDBC-ED-RBPDB-000009_Rev C
3. SCOPE
The scope of this study is stated at the Exhibit A – Scope of Work, chapter 3.3.1.2 item no.7,”
Chemical Injection Systems: The P&IDs reflect the chemicals and their injection locations in IDBU-
ED-RBPDB-000009, Recommendations for Chemical Treatment and Corrosion Monitoring of Oil and
Gas Production Facilities, in Exhibit E. However, equipment vendors may have chemical treatment
requirements that are different that what is shown on the P&IDs, especially with the boiler feed water
and raw water treatment systems.”
The P&IDs for chemical systems, especially for the boiler feed water and raw water treatment
systems will be updated wherever applicable.
4. DEFINITION
COMPANY COMPANY is defined as Mobil Cepu Limited (MCL)
CONTRACTOR/PURCHASER CONTRACTOR is defined as MCL’s appointed

representative
VENDOR/SUPPLIER VENDOR is defined as the company selected to supply the

equipment and services detailed in this report. This is the
entity having unit responsibility as defined in the industry
codes and standards.
CFF Central Field Facility
CPF Central Processing Facility
CA Antifoams
CD Demulsifiers

BANYU URIP
Rev 2
PROJECT
CE Polyelectrolytes
CH Biocides
CI Corrosion Inhibitor, Scale Inhibitor
CM Methanol, Morpholine
CP Pour Point Depressant (PPD)
CS Scavenger (H2S, O2)
CW Water Clarifier
CX Caustics
CZ Acids (Sulfuric Acid, Hydrochloric Acid)
GTG Gas Turbine Generator
PPF Production Processing Facility
TDS Total Dissolved Solid
TSS Total Suspended Solid
TC/THC Total Hydrocarbon
WHO World Health Organization
5. DESIGN BASIS AND CRITERIA
5.1 Design Basis

The current four cases of Hysys simulation are considered in determining the required chemical type
and dosage injected to the fluids in the CPF area
A. Case 1 – Peak Oil and Minimum Produced Water (Year 5)

B. Case 2 – Peak Total Liquid and Peak Gas Injection (Year 6)
C. Case 3 – Peak Total Liquid and Peak Gas Injection with High H2S and Low C6s (Year 6)
D. Case 4 – Peak Produced Water and Oil-Fuel Gas Turndown (Year 19)
Well fluid composition as shown in the table 10-4 of Facilities Design Basis (Appendix 5) is also
considered in determining type and dosage of chemicals to be injected.

BANYU URIP
Rev 2
PROJECT
5.2 Design Criteria

General design criteria will be refer to the project guidelines of Specification for Initial Fill
Requirements (IDBC-ED-OSPDS-C00011.) and also Recommendations for Chemical Treatment and
Corrosion Monitoring of Oil and Gas Production Facilities (IDBU-ED-RBPDB-000009 Rev C)
Water for Boiler and GTG NOx control is requiring treatment to achieve below specification:
 pH = 8.0–9.5 for HRSGs, SRU WHB & TO WHB, Package Boiler / pH = 6.0-8.5 for GTG
 TDS (ppm) =< 0.1
 TSS (ppm) = NIL
 TC or THC (ppm) = NIL
 Total Organic Matter = NIL
 Calcium Hardness as CaCO3 (ppm) = <0.02
 Magnesium Hardness as CaCO3 = < 0.02
 Conductivity (Microsiemens/cm) = <0.2
 Free CO2 (ppm) = NIL
 Non Volatile = NIL
 Iron (ppm) = <0.03
 Total Copper (ppm) = <0.02
 Ammonia (ppm) = -
6. CHEMICAL CONSUMPTION
Chemical consumption for CFF is summarized in the table below. Total consumption rate could be
changed depend on the dosage recommended by selected vendor. This total consumption is
including 10% margin.
Chemical Dosage Total Consumption
Description Level (ppm) Rate (m3/day) Remarks
Min Max Min Max
PPD 200 500 7.0 17.5 Continuous
Corrosion Inhibitor 10 30 0.6 1.7 Continuous
Scale Inhibitor 5 30 0.1 0.8 Continuous

BANYU URIP
Rev 2
PROJECT
Demulsifier 10 50 0.76 3.8 Continuous
Not installed now, but

may be needed in
future during low export
Wax Inhibitor 50 250 1.14 5.71
oil rates to mitigate wax
accumulation in
offshore pipeline.
Continuous or as
5 20 0.4 1.6
required
Containers with 4 L
Antifoam volume will be
5 20 provided on pumps Batch for AGRU, AGE
suction at the Gas
Treating system
Batch (All three pumps

H2S Scavenger 2 100 0.4 18.4
running)
Oxygen Scavenger - 2 - 0.28 Continuous
Continuous and
Intermittent
Biocide/Hypochlorite 0.5 2 18.43 29.02
concentration 8000
ppm
Batch. At maximum gas

Methanol 3.61 7.03 injection to well at
wellpad A and C
200 Liters of 4%-HCL for a maximum 1 hour is

Hydrochloric Acid required for acid chemical cleaning of Batch
Hypochlorite Generation Package
Batch. At Slop Oil Tank

Caustic (30%) 100 500 0.17 0.87
outlet
Poly-electrolyte 2 3 0.10 0.15 Continuous
Water Clarifier 5 15 0.37 1.11 Continuous
Continuous for pH
Morpholine (Note1) 10 20 0.02 0.03
control of BFW

BANYU URIP
Rev 2
PROJECT
Manually dosed Batch (during a process

Ammonia depend on the pH As Required upset of Quench
result Tower for pH control)
Manually dosed
depend on the water Batch (for Potable
Calcium Chloride As Required
quality to meet WHO Water Dosing Unit)
standard quality
Manually dosed
depend on the water Batch (for Potable
Sodium Bicarbonate As Required
quality to meet WHO Water Dosing Unit)
standard quality
Note.1. Special chemicals to achieve required pH with negligible impact to conductivity and TDS. To be confirmed later.
Table 1 – Chemical Consumption Summary
The detail calculation of the chemical consumption can be found in the attachment 1 of this report.
In the package items, chemicals are also required such as to keep Feed and make-up Water for
Boiler and HRSG in the specification.
Quantity of the chemicals for the package item is shown in table below:
Chemical
Total Consumption
Dosage Level
Description Rate (m3/day) Remarks
(ppm)
Min Max Min Max
Intermittent for RO unit(1~4 times a day

for UF backwashing/once in 4-8 month
for RO chemical cleaning) ,
Condensate Polishing Unit (Once in a
Caustic 30% 1,200 40,000 0.559 week for regeneration) , BFW treatment
(25 minutes per regeneration) ,
Hypochlorite generation package (once
in 6 months) and Sodium Hydroxide
injection package for Neutralization Pit

BANYU URIP
Rev 2
PROJECT
For Package Boiler, continuous during

Package Boiler in operating mode
(Less than 1,000 hours cumulatively
0.03 0.06 0.025 per year). Scale inhibitor is Phosphate
Scale Inhibitor
Solution based on 1% solution.
HRSG Continuously
As Required(Note2) Thermal Oxidizer and SRU WHBs
Scale Inhibitor
(same chemical
with scale Injected to Reverse Osmosis Unit (RO)
5 0.156
Continuously
inhibitor for
hydrocyclone)
Intermittent for RO unit (1~4 times a

day for UF backwashing/once in 4-8
months for RO chemical cleaning) ,
Condensate Polishing Unit(Once in a
Sulfuric Acid 98% 24 40,000 0.185
week for regeneration), BFW treatment
(25 minutes per regeneration) and
Sulfuric Acid injection package for
Neutralization Pit
Sodium Injected to Reverse Osmosis Unit (UF)

10 0.004
Hypochlorite Batch
Sodium Injected to Reverse Osmosis Unit (RO)

5 0.052
Metabisulfite Continuously
Injected to Potable Water Dosing Unit

Calcium Chloride 100 0.576
Continuously
Sodium Injected to Potable Water Dosing Unit

100 0.576
Bicarbonate Continuously
Injected continuously to Boiler Feed

Morpholine 0.15 45 0.002 0.574
Water treatment package
Note. 1. Concentration to be provided by chemical supplier.
Note.2. Chemical injection fitting only for future phosphate injection.
Table 2 – Chemical for Package Item

BANYU URIP
Rev 2
PROJECT
Water from sulfur pelletizer will be neutralized using Sodium Hydroxide.
6.1 Chemical Flammability and Toxicity

Below table are shown typical chemicals/solvent
Specific Gravity Toxic/High

Purpose Typical Chemicals Flash Point (oC)
(SG) Corrosive
Styrene – Maleic
Pour Point 0.89 – 0.95
Anhydride 33 – 35 Yes
Depressant (@15.6 oC)
Copolimer
Produced Water 0.98 – 1.02

Imidazoline
Corrosion (@15.6 °C) Not Flammable No
Acetate
Inhibitor
Naphtalene,
Demulsifier 0.94 – 0.98 28 – 30 Yes
Aromatic Naphta
Surface Scale 1.2 – 1.6

Phosphonate > 93 No
Inhibitor (@20 °C)
Tetrahydro-2H-
Morpholine 0.85 – 0.95 35 – 38 Yes
1,4-oxazine
0.8 – 1.1
Antifoam Glycol Base 22.9 No
(@21.1 °C)
Alkylamine
Benzyl-(C12-C16
Linier Alkyl)- 66 – 69 (ASTM D-
H2S Scavenger 1 – 1.18 (@15 °C) Yes
Dimethyl- 93) (Note 1)
Ammonium
Chloride
Oxygen 1.2 – 1.37

Sodium Bisulfide Not Flammable No
Scavenger (@25 °C)
1.0 – 1.1
Biocide Glutaraldehyde Not Flammable No
(@20 °C)
Dimethylamine –
1.14 – 1.18
Polyelectrolyte Epichlorohydrin Not Flammable No
(@25 °C)
Copolymer

BANYU URIP
Rev 2
PROJECT
Poly Aluminum 1.1 – 1.2

Water Clarifier Not Flammable No
Chloride (@25 °C)
103 – 106
pH Control Water, Amines 1 – 1.1 (@16 °C) No
(PMCC)
1.48 – 1.54
Sodium
pH Control (@25 °C) ASTM Not Flammable No
Hydroxyde
D-1298
Potasium
pH Control 2.044 (Water = 1) Not Flammable No
Hydroxyde
Hydrochloric Acid HCl, 30 – 37% 1.1 – 1.19 Not Flammable Yes
Sulfuric Acid H2SO4, 90 – 98% 1.75 – 1.85 Not Flammable Yes
2.1 – 2.3
Calcium Chloride CaCl2, powder Not Flammable No
(@68 °F)
Sodium 2.0 – 2.2 (Water =

NaHCO3, powder Not Flammable No
Bicarbonate 1)
Caustic Not Flammable Yes
Methanol 12 Yes
Sodium
Not Flammable Yes
Hypochlorite
Sodium
Not Flammable No
Metabisulfite
Note 1. Flammable for some Vendors.
Table 3 – Chemical Type and Injection Summary
7. CHEMICAL STORAGE
Storage that are provided in the Banyu Urip facility, such as iso tank which has a capacity of 25 m3
and tote tank with capacity of 2 m3 for each tank will be used to store chemicals required.
The material required for the chemical storage will be based on MSDS required by selected vendor.
Chemical requirement for one month consumption is shown in the table below:

BANYU URIP
Rev 2
PROJECT
One Month
Consumption Containers
3
Storage
Chemicals Dosage (ppm) (m /month), Required for
Location
Including batch 30-day Storage
injection
Area “V/O” and

PPD 200 – 500 217.4 – 543.5 9 - 22 Iso Tanks
chemical shelter
Flowline Produced Water Area “V/O” and

10 – 20 12.1 – 36.3 2 Iso Tanks
Corrosion Inhibitor (CI) chemical shelter
Area “V/O” and

Scale Inhibitor (CI) 5 – 30 4.3 – 25.7 1 Iso Tanks
chemical shelter
Area “V/O” and

Demulsifier (CD) 10 – 50 10.4 – 52.0 1 - 2 Iso Tanks
chemical shelter
Area “V/O” and

chemical shelter;
Antifoam (CA) 5 - 20 8.1 – 32.3 1 - 2 Iso Tanks
Area K for
AGRU and AGE
Area “V/O” and

H2S Scavenger (CS) 2 – 402 As Required Iso/Tote Tank
chemical shelter
Area “V/O” and

O2 Scavenger (CS) 5 – 10 6.0 – 12.0 3 - 6 Iso Tanks
chemical shelter
200 Liters of 4%-HCL for a

maximum 1 hour is required for Area “P” and
Hydrochloric Acid Iso Tank
acid chemical cleaning of chemical shelter
Hypochlorite Generation Package
Area “P” and

Polyelectrolyte 2–3 3.0 – 4.6 2 - 3 Tote Tanks
chemical shelter
Area “P” and

Clarifier (CW) 5 – 15 11.4 – 34.3 1 - 2 Iso Tank
chemical shelter
Tote Tank/Iso Area “P” and

Methanol (CM) As Required
Tank chemical shelter
Note. Chemical consumption may change subject to dosage used by selected vendor. Chemical consumption here in this table
is including 10% margin.
Table 4 – One Month Chemical Requirement

BANYU URIP
Rev 2
PROJECT
And for the package vendor, below table is shown one month consumption:
One Month
Dosage Consumption Containers Required for Storage
Chemicals 3
(ppm) (m /month), Including 30-day Storage Location
batch injection
Caustics will be
Area “P” and
Caustics 500 – supplied from Sodium
84.5 chemical
30% 40,000 Hydroxide Tank
shelter
(ABJ678511)
10,000 9,900 kg/1000 hr Area “V/O”

Scale Inhibitor and chemical
5 0.5 1 Tote Tank
shelter
Area “P” and

Sulfuric Acids 12 –
31.77 2 Iso Tanks chemical
98% 40,000
shelter
Sodium Area “P” and

Metabisulfite 5 0.5 1 Tote Tank chemical
(SMBS) shelter
Area “P” and

Calcium 1 Iso /
100 8.3 chemical
Chloride 5 Tote Tanks
shelter
Area “P” and

Sodium 1 Iso /
100 8.3 chemical
Bicarbonate 5 Tote Tanks
shelter
Area “P” and

(Note 2) (Note 3)
Ammonia As Required Ammonia Bottle chemical
shelter
Area “P” and

Morpholine 10 – 20 0.54 – 1.08 1 Tote Tank chemical
shelter
Analyzer Area “P” and

(Note 4) (Note 4)
Calibration As Required Bottle chemical
Gas shelter
Note 1. Chemical consumption may change subject to dosage used by selected vendor.

BANYU URIP
Rev 2
PROJECT
Note 2. Estimated 3 to 4 bottles during start-up and shutdown.
Note 3. 4-Bottle Rack to be provided for Ammonia Bottles.
Note 4. Initial Bottle to be provided by Vendor, refill by MCL.
Table 5 – One Month Chemical Requirement for Package Vendor

BANYU URIP
Rev 2
PROJECT
MPI: Not Classified APPENDIX
Appendix - 1
CHEMICAL CONSUMPTION

CALCULATION SHEET
Pour Point Depressant (PPD)

Page 1 of 1
JOB No: SO-2435

JOB NAME : BANYU URIP PROJECT
CLIENT : MCL
A. Injection Point - Wellpad (*chemical concentration : 100 w %)

PPD Injection PPD Injection
PPD Tank PPD Supply Pump
Total Oil PPD injected Total Chemical Injected Pump Capacity Pump Capacity
Capacity Capacity Remarks
(ITT) (Recommended)
3
kbopd m3/day ppm Density (kg/m3) m3/day m /month m3 m3/hour (Normal) l/d (Normal) l/d (Normal)
Wellpad A 68 10,811 200 922.7 2.34 70.3 0 - 15,000 0 - 10,000
40.0 19.0
500 922.7 5.86 175.8 (2x100%) (2x100%)
Wellpad B 94 14,945 200 922.7 3.24 97.2 0 - 15,000 0 - 10,000

40.0 19.0
500 922.7 8.10 243.0 (2x100%) (2x100%)
Wellpad C 75 11,924 200 922.7 2.58 77.5 0 - 15,000 0 - 10,000

40.0 19.0
500 922.7 6.46 193.8 (2x100%) (2x100%)
Continuous Injection
Total for Wellpad s 185 29,413 200 922.7 6.38 191.3
500 922.7 15.94 478.2
Low Producing Well 1 159 200 922.7 0.03 NA
500 922.7 0.09 NA
High Producing Well 20 3,180 200 922.7 0.69 NA
500 922.7 1.72 NA
* 1month=30days
B. Injection Point - Crude Export (Note 4)

PPD Injection PPD Injection
PPD Tank PPD Supply Pump
Total Oil PPD injected Total Chemical Injected Pump Capacity Pump Capacity
(ITT) (Recommended)
kbopd m3/day ppm Density (kg/m )
3 3
m /day
3
m /month m
3 3
m /hour (Normal) l/d (Normal) l/d (Normal)
Crude Export 185 30,912 200 922.7 6.70 NA 0 - 40,000 0 - 20,000
40.0 19.0 Intermittent as required
500 922.7 16.75 NA (2x100%) (2x100%)
C. Total PPD Required

PPD Dosage (ppm) m3/day m3/month Margin (%) Iso Tanks/Month
200 7.0 210.4 8
10
500 17.5 526.0 21
Note:
1. Actual injected concentration may change upon chemical supplier selection
2. PPD dosage is based on Styrene - Maleic Anhydride Copolymer
3. Total Chemical Required is including 10% Margin
4. Range required for each well control valve to cover cases 1 - 4 flows
CALCULATION SHEET
Flowline/ Produced Water Corrosion Inhibitor (CI)

Page 1 of 1
JOB No: SO-2435

CLIENT : MCL
A. Injection Point - Wellpad (*chemical concentration : 100 w %)

CI Tank CI Supply Pump CI Injection Pump
Total Produced Water CI injected Total Chemical Injected
Capacity Capacity Capacity Remarks
3 3 3 3 3 3
kbpd m /day ppm Density (kg/m ) m /day m /month m m /hour (Normal) l/d (Normal)
Wellpad A 68 10,811 10 994 0.11 3.3 0 - 750
19.0 19.0
30 994 0.33 9.8 (2x100%)
Wellpad B 94 14,945 10 994 0.15 4.5 0 - 750

19.0 19.0
30 994 0.45 13.5 (2x100%)
Wellpad C 75 11,924 10 994 0.12 3.6 0 - 750

19.0 19.0
30 994 0.36 10.8 (2x100%)
Total for Wellpads 200.1 31,813 10 994 0.32 9.6
30 994 0.96 28.8
Low Watercut Well 1.0 159 10 994 0.002 0.05
30 994 0.005 0.14
High Watercut Well 10.0 1,590 10 994 0.02 0.5
30 994 0.05 1.4
* 1month=30days
B. Injection Point - CPF

Additional Untreated Water CI injected Total Chemical Injected
3 3 3 3 3 3
kbpd m /day ppm Density (kg/m ) m /day m /month m m /hour (Normal) l/d (Normal)
LP Production Separator Inlet A 1,728 10 994 0.02 0.5
30 994 0.05 1.6 0 - 100
LP Production Separator Inlet B 1,728 10 994 0.02 0.5 (2x100%)
30 994 0.05 1.6

Crude Oil Stripper A 7,872 10 994 0.08 2.4
19.0 19.0
30 994 0.24 7.1 0 - 500
Crude Oil Stripper B 7,872 10 994 0.08 2.4 (2x100%)
30 994 0.24 7.1

Injection Water Pump Suction 50,112 10 994 0.50 15.1 Continuous Injection
30 994 1.51 45.4 (Provision)
C. Total CI Required
CI Dosage (ppm) m3/day m3/month Margin (%) Iso Tanks/Month
10 0.6 18.6 0.7
10
30 1.7 55.9 2.2
Note:
CALCULATION SHEET
Scale Inhibitor (CI)

Page 1 of 1
JOB No: SO-2435

CLIENT : MCL
A. Injection Point - CPF (*chemical concentration : 100 w %)

Total Water CI injected Total Chemical Injected
kbwpd m3/day ppm Density (kg/m3) m3/day m3/month m3 m3/hour (Normal) l/d (Normal)
Hydrocyclone Inlet Train A 103 17,760 5 1,416 0.06 1.9
30 1,416 0.38 11.3 0 - 3,000
40.0 19.0 Continuous Injection.
Hydrocyclone Inlet Train B 103 17,760 5 1,416 0.06 1.9 (2x100%) (Note 3)
30 1,416 0.38 11.3

* 1month=30days
B. Total CI Required
CI Dosage (ppm) m3/day m3/month Margin (%) Iso Tanks/Month
5 0.1 4.1 0.2
10
30 0.8 24.8 1.0
Note:
3. Pump Capacity is recommended to reduce (to be confirmed after chemical vendor selected)
CALCULATION SHEET
Paraffin / Wax Inhibitor (CI)

Page 1 of 1
JOB No: SO-2435

CLIENT : MCL

Total Oil Wax Inhibitor injected Total Chemical Injected Remarks
3 3 3 3
kbopd m /day ppm Density (kg/m ) m /day m /month
Crude Export 185 29,413 50 1,416 1.04 31.2 Future (if required)
250 1,416 5.19 155.8
* 1month=30days
B. Total Wax Inhibitor Required

Wax Inhibitor Dosage (ppm) m3/day m3/month Margin (%) Iso Tanks/Month
50 1.14 34.3 1.4
10
250 5.71 171.4 6.9
Note:
CALCULATION SHEET
Demulsifier (CD)
Page 1 of 1
JOB No: SO-2435

CLIENT : MCL
A. Injection Point - CPF (*chemical concentration 100 w %)

CD Injection
CD Tank CD Supply Pump
Total Oil CD injected Total Chemical Injected Pump
Capacity
kblpd m3/day ppm Density (kg/m3) m3/day m3/month m3 m3/hour (Normal) l/d (Normal)
Dehydrator Inlet A 99 17,040 10 957 0.18 NA
50 957 0.89 NA As required to recover from
Dehydrator Inlet B 99 17,040 10 957 0.18 NA dehydrator grid shorting event
50 957 0.89 NA 0 - 3,575

40.0 19.0
HP Production Separator Inlet A 93 16,032 10 957 0.17 5.0 (2x100%)
50 957 0.84 25.1

HP Production Separator Inlet B 93 16,032 10 957 0.17 5.0
50 957 0.84 25.1
* 1month=30days
B. Total CD Required
CD Dosage (ppm) m3/day m3/month Margin (%) Iso Tanks/Month
10 0.76 11.1 0.4
10
50 3.80 55.3 2.2
Note:
CALCULATION SHEET
Antifoam (CA)
Page 1 of 1
JOB No: SO-2435

CLIENT : MCL

CA Supply Pump CA Injection
Total Oil CA injected Total Chemical Injected CA Tank Capacity
Capacity Pump Capacity Remarks
3
kblpd m3/day ppm Density (kg/m ) m3/day m3/month m3 m3/hour (Normal) l/d (Normal)
Test Separator Inlet A 20 3,192 5 812 0.03 1.0
Assumed Each Well is tested at
20 812 0.13 3.9 duration of 6 hours with a
Test Separator Inlet B 20 3,192 5 812 0.03 1.0 maximum flowrate of 40 kbpd.
Continous injection
20 812 0.13 3.9
HP Production Separator Inlet A 93 16,032 5 812 0.16 4.9
20 812 0.66 19.7 0 - 2,000
40.0 19.0 Continuous Injection
HP Production Separator Inlet B 93 16,032 5 812 0.16 4.9 (2x100%)
20 812 0.66 19.7

LP Production Separator Inlet A 5 812 0.00 0.0
LP Separator have cyclone
20 812 0.00 0.0 inlet. Injection fittings for
LP Production Separator Inlet B 5 812 0.00 0.0 future antifoam injection to
be provided.
20 812 0.00 0.0
* 1month=30days
B. Total CA Required
CA Dosage (ppm) Continuous Injection Batch Injection
Margin (%) Iso Tanks/Month
m3/day m3/month
5 0.4 13.0 Container with 4 L capacity of antifoam will be provided on 0.5
AGRU and AGE reflux pump that required batch injection 10
20 1.6 52.1 of antifoam 2.1
Note:
2. Antifoam for Amine System is Glycol Base (Recommended by LICENSOR (SHELL))
CALCULATION SHEET
H2S Scavenger (CS)

Page 1 of 1
JOB No: SO-2435

CLIENT : MCL

CS Injection
CS Tank CS Supply Pump
Total Fluid CS injected Total Chemical Injected Pump Remarks
Capacity Capacity
Capacity
3 3 3 3 3 3
kblpd (actual flow) m /day ppm Density (kg/m ) m /day m /month m m /hour (Normal) l/d (Normal)
Crude Oil Booster Pump Suction 194 30,912 2 1,033 0.20 NA
100 1,033 9.97 NA
Crude Oil Stripper Cooler A 92 15,960 2 1,033 0.10 NA 0 - 12,000 As required for off-spec oil
40.0 19.0
100 1,033 5.15 NA (3x50%)
Crude Oil Stripper Cooler B 92 15,960 2 1,033 0.10 NA

100 1,033 5.15 NA
* 1month=30days
B. Total CS Required
CS Dosage (ppm) m3/day m3/month Margin (%) Remarks
2 0.4 NA
10 All three pumps running, considering worst case

100 18.4 NA that chemical is injected into crude oil booster
pump suction and stripper cooler A/B outlet
Note:
2. Using Maximum Concentration, chemical will be injected at one point only
CALCULATION SHEET
O2 Scavenger (CS)
Page 1 of 1
JOB No: SO-2435

CLIENT : MCL
A. Injection Point (*chemical concentration : 30 w %)

CS Injection
CS Tank CS Supply Pump
Total Fluid CS injected Total Chemical Injected Pump
Capacity
kbwpd m3/day ppm Density (kg/m3) m3/day m3/month m3 m3/hour (Normal) l/d (Normal)
Water Deaerator A 23,892 2 1,380 0.12 3.5
Continuous as required
* According to water deaerator
Water Deaerator B 23,892 2 1,380 0.12 3.5 vendor's information, 2kg of
0 - 300
10.0 19.0 oxygen scavenger is required
(3x50%)
to reduce oxygen level of each
Waste Water Treatment Unit 5,280 2 1,380 0.03 0.8 water deaerator from 50ppb to
20ppb.
* 1month=30days * Total Fluid is based on equipment design capacity.
B. Total CS Required
CS Dosage (ppm) m3/day m3/month Margin (%) Tote Tanks/Month
2 0.28 8.46 4.2
10
Note:
CALCULATION SHEET
Biocide/Hypochlorite (CH)
Page 1 of 1
JOB No: SO-2435

CLIENT : MCL
A. Injection Point (*chemical concentration : 0.8 w %)

CH Injection
CH Tank CH Supply Pump
Total Water CH injected Total Chemical Injected Pump
Capacity
m3/h 3
m /day ppm Density (kg/m )
3
L/hr 3
m /day
3
m /month m
3 3
m /hour (Normal) l/d (Normal)
Sewage Treatment Unit
Intermittent Injection
Potable Water Tank Inlet 10.0 240 0.5 1,072 0.6 0.014 0.4
0.5 1,072 0.6 0.014 0.4
Basin Water Intake 2,200.0 52,800 1 1,072 275 6.600 198.0
2 1,072 550 13.200 396.0
Media Filter Sump 2,040.0 48,960 1 1,072 255 6.120 183.6
1 1,072 255 6.120 183.6
Water Deaerator Inlet 1,810.0 43,440 1 1,072 0.000 0.0 to be
to be confirmed by
confirmed by 24,000.0 Intermittent Injection (Provision)
1 1,072 0.000 0.0 vendor
vendor
Waste Water Treatment Unit 200.0 4,800 1,072 0.000 0.0
2 1,072 50 1.200 36.0
Diesel Fuel Inlet Filter 40.0 960 1,072 0.000 0.0
2 1,072 10 0.240 7.2
Discharge of Recycle Pumps 2.0 48 1,072 0.000 0.0
2 1,072 1 0.012 0.4
LP Degassing Vessel Inlet 1,406 33,750 1 1,072 3.937 118.1
2 1,072 7.873 236.2
Riverwater Lift Pumps 1 1,072 0.000 0.0
Via tote tank N/A N/A Intermittent Injection
2 1,072 0.286 8.6
* 1month=30days
B. Total CH Required
3 3
CH Dosage (ppm) m /day m /month Remarks Margin (%)
0.5 18.34 550.15
10
2 28.95 955.20
Note:
3. Generator sized for 24 m 3 /day with 0.8% concentration
4. Biocide for Sewage Treatment Unit to be provided as a tablet feeder(capa : 60days feeding).
CALCULATION SHEET
Polyelectrolite (CE) Page 1 of 1
JOB No: SO-2435

CLIENT : MCL

CE Tank CE Supply Pump CE Injection
Total Water CE injected Total Chemical Injected
Capacity Capacity Pump Capacity Remarks
kbwpd m3/day ppm 3
Density (kg/m ) m3/day m3/month m3 m3/hour (Normal) l/d (Normal)
Raw Water Clarifier 48,000 0.5 1,140 0.0702 2.1053 0 - 150
5.0 19.0 Continuous Injection
(2x100%)
* 1month=30days
B. Total CE Required
CE Dosage (ppm) m3/day m3/month Margin (%) Tote Tanks/Month
0.5 0.08 2.32 1.2
10
Note:
CALCULATION SHEET
Clarifier (CW)
Page 1 of 1
JOB No: SO-2435

CLIENT : MCL

CW Tank CW Supply Pump CW Injection
Total Water CW injected Total Chemical Injected
kbwpd m3/day ppm Density (kg/m )
3 3
m /day
3
m /month m
3 3
m /hour (Normal) l/d (Normal)
Raw Water Clarifier 48,000 12 1,160 1.7 51.3

Hydrocyclone Inlet A 103 16,450 5 1,032 0.080 2.5 0 - 2000

14.0 19.0
15 1,032 0.24 7.4 (2x100%)
Provision
Hydrocyclone Inlet B 103 16,450 5 1,032 0.080 2.5
15 1,032 0.24 7.4
* 1month=30days
B. Total CW Required
3
CW Dosage (ppm) m /day m3/month Margin (%) Remarks Iso Tanks/Month
12 1.82 56.4 CW Injected to the 2.3
10 Hydrocyclone is provision
only 0
Note:

CALCULATION SHEET
Methanol (CM)
Page 1 of 1
JOB No: SO-2435

CLIENT : MCL
A. Gas Injection Line (*chemical concentration : 100 w %)
Total Gas CM injected Total Chemical Injected CM Tank Capacity CM Supply Pump Capacity CM Supply Pump Capacity
Remarks
3 3 3 m3 3 m3/hour (Normal) l/d (Normal)
MSCFD ppm m /day m /month m m /hour (Normal) l/d (Normal)
(Recommended) (Recommended) (Recommended)
Gas Injection to wellpad A 20 (Note 3) 3.606 NA Batch as Required
0 - 7,500 0 - 3,600
Gas Injection to wellpad C 20 (Note 3) 3.606 NA 10.0 2.0 10.0 0.2 Batch as Required
(2x100%) (2x100%)
Maximum Capacity of AGRU 39 (Note 4) 7.031 NA Batch as Required
* 1month=30days
B. Total CM Required
3 3
CM Dosage (ppm) m /day m /month Margin (%)
3.61 NA
7.03 NA
Note:
2. MSCFD = 106 SCFD
3. Max. Start-up rate requiring Methanol
4. Design Case of AGRU
CALCULATION SHEET
Morpholine (CM)
Page 1 of 1
JOB No: SO-2435

CLIENT : MCL
A. BFW Line (*chemical concentration : 30 w %)

CM Tank CM Supply Pump CM Injection
Total Water CM injected Total Chemical Injected
3
m /h m3/day ppm m3/day m3/month m3 m3/hour (Normal) l/d (Normal)
BFW pump suction 145.0 3,480 0.15 0.0017 0.1 Continuous Injection
2.0 - 100.0 Dosage 0.15 ppm for pH 8 /
45 0.5220 15.7 45ppm for pH 9.5
* 1month=30days
C. Wellpad A Gas Injection Blowdown Header

Total Gas CM injected Total Chemical Injected Remarks
MSCFD ppm m3/day m3/month
Wellpad A Gas Injection Blowdown
1 0.000 0.0 Batch Injection
Header
10 0.000 0.0
D. Wellpad C Gas Injection Blowdown Header

Total Gas CM injected Total Chemical Injected Remarks
C. Total CM Required
CM Dosage (ppm) m3/day m3/month Margin (%) Tote Tanks/Month Batch Injection
0.15 0.002 0.06 0.0
10
45 0.574 17.23 8.6
=> Recommended monthly consumption is 100 liter/day x 30 days x 1.2=3600 liter (2 tote tanks). It's based on pump capacity.
Note:
CALCULATION SHEET
Chemicals for Package Vendor - 1

Page 1 of 1
JOB No: SO-2435

CLIENT : MCL
Water package Vendor's information

Consumpti
on per one
Monthly
Injection Rate injection
Total water flowrate at Injection Monthly Consumption
Dosage at 100% w during chemical Injection pump capacity duration (package
injection point Frequency frequency (1 month = 30
injection vendor's
days)
information
)
ppm m3/hr l/hr l/hr l/day min liter liter/month
once a 8.3
Condensate Polishing H2SO4 (98%) Regeneration 40000 18 420 500 12,000 25 175 4 700
day
Unit once a 8.3
NaOH (30%) Regeneration 40000 10.8 1265 1500 36,000 25 527 4 2108
day
H2SO4 (98%) Regeneration 40000 8.6 200 500 12,000 25 Once per day 84 30 2520
BFW treatment Unit
NaOH (30%) Regeneration 40000 7.7 900 1500 36,000 25 Once per day 376 30 11280
H2SO4 (98%) ph Control 24 108 1.5 5 120 - continuous - - 1080
H2SO4 (98%) UF cleaning 1470 58 48 100 2,400 0.83 8 times a day 1.4 240 336
NaOH (30%) UF cleaning 1200 58 175 220 5,280 0.83 8 times a day 2.4 240 576
RO units
NaOCl (2%) UF cleaning 10 58 29 150 3,600 0.83 8 times a day 0.4 240 96
Antiscalant
RO operation 5 108 5.4 10 240 - continuous - - 3888
(*)(10%)
SMBS (30%) RO operation 5 108 1.8 5 240 - continuous - - 1296
Potable Water Dosing CaCl2(5%) Service 100 10 20 50 1,200 - continuous - - 14400

Unit NaHCO3(5%) Service 100 10 20 50 1,200 - continuous - - 14400
* Antiscalant is same chemical with scale inhibitor for hydrocyclone. / concentration to be confirmed later
* For NaOH, allowable maximum concentration is 30% due to viscosity and freezing point (solidification).
Normal consumption Consumption with 20% margin
Total chemical consumption for water H2SO4 98% 4,636 liter/month 5,563 liter/month Note 1
packages NaOH 30% 13,964 liter/month 16,757 liter/month Note 2
NaOCl 2% 96 liter/month 115 liter/month
Antiscalant 10% 3,888 liter/month 4,666 liter/month
SMBS 30% 1,296 liter/month 1,555 liter/month
CaCl2 5% 14,400 liter/month 17,280 liter/month
NaHCO3 5% 14,400 liter/month 17,280 liter/month
Note
1. 7.2 m3 of H2SO4 98% with 20% margin would be applied to consumption for Neutralization Pit.
Total consumption of H2SO4 98% would be 12.8 m3/month.
2. 1 m3 of NaOH 30% would be applied to consumption for Neutralization Pit.
Total consumption of NaOH 30% would be 18 m3/month.
3. Mixing facility for powder chemicals such as SMBS, CaCl2 and NaHCO3 shall be supplied.
CALCULATION SHEET
Chemicals for Package Vendor - 2

Page 1 of 1
JOB No: SO-2435

CLIENT : MCL
1. Phosphate Consumption for HRSGs
Na3PO4·12H2O Molecular weight 380 g/mol

Normal Steam Production 120 ton/hr (for 4 or 5 HRSGs)
Maximum Steam Production 140 ton/hr
Phosphate solution concentration : 1 % S.G. : 1
1.1 Normal Dosing rate for total HRSGs

: PO4 maintenance x (Na3PO4·12H2O/PO4) x normal blowdown rate = 0.06 ppm
- Normal Daily consumption : Dosing rate x normal steam production rate = 172.9 g/day
Normal Daily consumption of phosphate solution of 1 % concentration 17.3 liter / day
=> Consumption of liter/month (30days) 518.7 liter / month
=> Consumption of liter/hr 0.7 liter / hr
- Chemical Day tank capacity per
1.0 m3
each HRSG
if tank capacity is converted to
: in case of 5 HRSGs operation 11.6 days
operating days
: in case of 4 HRSGs operation 14.5 days
2. Phosphate Consumption for Package Boiler
Na3PO4·12H2O Molecular weight 380 g/mol

Normal Steam Production 50 ton/hr
Maximum Steam Production 50 ton/hr
Phosphate solution concentration : 1 % S.G. : 1
2.1 Normal Dosing rate

: PO4 maintenance x (Na3PO4·12H2O/PO4) x normal blowdown rate = 0.03 ppm
- Normal Daily consumption : Dosing rate x normal steam production rate = 36.0 g/day
Normal Daily consumption of phosphate solution of 1 % concentration 3.6 liter / day
=> Consumption of liter/month (30days) 108.1 liter / month
=> Consumption of liter/hr 0.2 liter / hr
- Chemical Day Tank capacity : 1 m3
if tank capacity is converted to operating days 277.6 days
=> Total Consumption with 20% margin 752 liter / month (1 Tote tank)
BANYU URIP
Rev 2
PROJECT
Appendix - 2
SIMPLIFIED PFD

Banyu simplified PFD_rev.02
WELL PAD A,B, and C

Gas Injection / Cap Gas
Methanol
Antifoam
BANYU URIP PROJECT SIMPLIFIED PFD
A/B GAS TREATMENT
150
Gas Lift Water Injection A to MP Steam
train B 10 8 3516 6
LP Steam 43
10
10 8 Thermal
1009
GTG
38
8
Test well manifold AGRU HP
10 1057
to AGE Fuel
A 1T 1T 1T S 39
train B 2T SRU Gas
10 1T
10 AGRU AGRU TGU Scrubber Fuel Gas Compressor 14 209
Test Inlet Cooler Feed Gas
Well Pad A Production Flowline Pig 2x100% LP Fuel Gas
12 17
12
Corrosion to AGRU Rich Amine 27
243
Inhibitor + x 11 for each wellhead 2
PPD to 8 974
Water Injection B LP Guel Gas from
train B 20 1T from
Gas Lift Scrubber train B
LP Fuel gas/gas 8 train B to
172 48 75 54
Exchanger
12 4206 12514 17926 17857 6
Test well manifold

24 GLC 1st Stage to Skim oil separator
45 10 161 8 8
Suction 10 Gas Lift 2nd 6 6
Pig Launcher & Riceiver B to Gas Gas Injection / Cap Gas A
20
8
Scrubber Gas Lift 1st 4104 Suction 12583
6
B train B Discharge Gas Lift 1st Injection
18 12 Scrubber 6
2T 2T C Scrubber 2T Dehydration Discharge 2T
2T R Discharge
2T 2T C
Well Pad B Production Flowline Pig 10 10 Scrubber Cooler
50
to 2x50% 2x50% Gas Injection / Cap Gas C
20 Gas Lift 2T (Regen ; 1T) Gas Lift Gas
train B Gas Lift 1st 3829 Gas Injection
to 2 Compressor Compressor Injection Suction
Discharge
1T train B 1st Stage 2nd Stage Scrubber
Corrosion Scrubber
Inhibitor + Well Pad B Production Flowline Pig 20
LP Steam
PPD x 11 for each wellhead Launcher & Riceiver
HP Scrubber MP Steam
Methanol 48
8 6
Gas Injection / Cap Gas 1126 Gas Lift A
to
Gas Lift 2
Water Injection C train B
20 6
18 Gas Lift B
6 8 10 Crude Oil
8
Stripper 6
18 Gas Lift C
HP Inlet Gas 48 Overhead
Test well manifold 119 48 113
to Cooler Condenser
C 1209 VRC 2nd 347 450 71
2x50%
train B
from Suction 2T 2T
S 2T S 2T
train B Scrubber 8 8 8
VRC 2nd
Well Pad C Production Flowline Suction
Corrosion VRC 1st VRC 1st
Pig Launcher & Riceiver to VRC 2nd
Inhibitor + Cooler
14
train B 2x50% 2x50% Suction
PPD x 11 for each wellhead
8 Scrubber
110 GAS LIFT & INJECTION
14
1207 6 47 VRC 1st
2T 12 4
Suction
795
HP Scrubber Pump 24
2x100%
Anti Foam Corrosion LP Separator
2T 2 MP Steam
Demulsifier Inhibitor; 142
Antifoam 14
RAW WATER TREATMENT 100 125 144 174
Water Clarifier /
Corrosion Demulsifier Dehydrator 588 12 519
450 MP Steam
Polyelectrolyte
Biocide Inhibitor 2T
2T 244
Injection 14 Crude Oil 14 20 Crude Oil
Clarifier 100
20 Water Stripper Crude Oil Stripper 3449
20 16 1209 8
18 Clarifier 6 Feed/Bottoms
Raw Stripper 6
Exchanger Custody to TWU
Water Feed Heater
139
Meter Pipeline
from 139 Corrosion
107 Dehydrator Water 76 Skid
train B 12 16 Inhibitor
M Transfer Pump 485
4 71 4 209 2068 OIL TREATMENT
99 H2S
4x25%
2T S
Scavenger Crude Oil
4 2 111
8 75 76
Stripper
M Hydrocyclone 12
1T Slop Oil Tank 416 Bottom Pump 174 5240 20
Filter Feed Sump 1T Crude Export
99 2 1ea
Skim Oil Pipeline
Multimedia 16 24 20
1347 Separator to Crude Oil
fine filter Crude Oil Crude oil Crude oil Pipeline
train B 177 Stripper
Blowdown Collection Sump from Storage Booster Pump Shipping Pump Pig Launcher
Cooler
Filtered 140 train B Tank 2+1
water Skim Oil Separator
Anti Foam 20
Vent tank Water Pump By EPC-2
Scouring PPD;
14 AVRC Suction
Air Blowing
4
4 H2S
Scrubber AVRC
Deaerator 4
6
Vacuum
1T 2x50% S
Line size (inch)
Pump Produced
Package Water 60
Water
Deaerator Operating Temperature (°C)
LP Degassing 2 99
2T Vessel Operating Pressure (Kpag)

Water 2 To Skim oil separator
1T
to
Drain Produced 90
109
AVRC Suction 52 52 53
Water
O2
HP Degassing
8
140
24
24
Scrubber Pump
0 14
BANYU URIP PROJECT
Scavenger 174 2x100% 692 12686
18 Vessel 1ea 2ea
Water Injection A
and Biocide F
Produced 12
30
2ea
24 24 14
Water Injection
j B SIMPLIFIED PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM
Water Cooler from Produced water Skim Injection
I j i Water
W IInjection
j i
Injection
2x50% train B BiocideTank Water Water Booster Pump 14
Water Injection C MADE BY SOL LEE
20 Surge Pump CHECKED BY INKYUNG SONG
Corrosion
3+1
Tank Inhibitor
Water transfer Pump PRODUCED WATER TREATMENT & WATER INJECTION
5x25%
BANYU URIP
Rev 2
PROJECT
Appendix – 3
WELL AND WELL-PAD DESIGN RATES –
TABLE 10-3 FACILITIES DESIGN BASIS

IDBU-ED-BBPDB-000002
BANYU Facilities Design Basis (FDB) 04 May 2011
URIP Rev 3
PROJECT MPI: Not Classified Page 87 of 318
TABLE 10 - 3: BANYU-URIP FACILITY, WELL AND WELLPAD DESIGN RATES

BU FACILITY, WELL, & WELLPAD DESIGN RATES
Instantaneous Maximum Peak Design Rates
Total Mscfd - Preliminary Tentativ Water

Carbonate Clastic Water Gas Possible Total Gas Lift Injection Preliminary
Overall Total Oil (Production flowline e
Production Production Injection Injection Future Liquids Supply Water Injection
kbopd & returned lift distance Flowline Supply
Facility Wells Wells Wells Wells Wells kblpd
gas) (m) size
Mscfd Line Size
kbwpd
Design
30 3 (4) 13 2 1 185 300 124 - - 75 365 (1, 2) -
No. Production Flowlines between Wellpads

No. Water No. Gas Wtr Injection Lines (5)
Production No. Production and CPF
Well & Injection Injection
Wells & Max Wells & Max Possible G/L
Wells & Wells &
Wellpad Instantaneo Instantaneous Future Total Mscfd - Lines
Max Max
Info us rate/well rate/well Wells Total Oil Total (Production Preliminary Flowlin Mscfd Preliminary
rate/well rate/well Liquids flowline kbwpd Water Injection
(kblpd, (kblpd, Mscfd) kbopd & returned e size 3
(kbwpd) (Mscfd) kblpd distance (m) Line Size
Mscfd) gas lift)
Wellpad 10 2 (4) 4 1
1 68 93 65 700 16" 20 112 14"
A (20,26) (3 , 16) (28) (51)
Wellpad 10 1 5
0 0 94 116 50 700
2x
20 140 14"
B (20,17) (2 , 7) (28) 14"
Wellpad 10 1 4 1
0 75 96 50 2000 20" 20 112 14"
C (20,27) (3, 5) (28) (45)
Notes:
1. The 4th or spare injection pump and facility can be used for downtime makeup to 440 kbwpd if
needed.
2. Maximum water injection rate is 28 kbwpd per well.
3. Tentative flowline sizes to be confirmed during flow assurance simulations.
4. Existing BU-A2 well at Wellpad A was formerly earmarked as a fourth Clastic Producer but is now
a "Future Use" well.
5. Water injection lines to be sized for maximum water injection capacity on wellpad.
6. Predicted peak rates were from reservoir simulation results, which are subject to uncertainty and
future adjustment. They were intended to be used as guideline for facility design basis. Consult
with Subsurface group when considering revise / optimize facility design based on the numbers
shown in the table.
IDBU-ED-BBPDB-000002 Rev 3.doc

BANYU URIP
Rev 2
PROJECT
Appendix – 4
HEAT AND MASS BALANCE FLOW SUMMARY
BY-CASE –

TABLE 10 – 9: HEAT & MASS BALANCE FLOW SUMMARY BY CASE
Case-1 Case-2 Case-3 Case-4
Peak Oil & Peak Liquid Peak Liquid Peak
Stream Minimum & Peak Gas & Peak Gas Produced
Annual
Day Produced Injection Injection Water &
Fluid Average
Design Water Year 6 with Low Oil/Fuel Gas
Rate
Rate Year 5 H2S & High Turndown
C6 s Year 19
Year 6
Export Oil, kSTBD at 60 180 185 185.0 185.0 185.0 18.5

o
F 185.0 182.9 182.9 18.5
• From Carbonate Wells,
kSTBD at 60 oF(1)
0.0 2.1 2.1 0.0
• From Clastic Wells,
kSTBD at 60 oF(1)
0.0 30.3 31.9 54.6
• From Non-Solution Gas
through Oil Producing
Wells, Mscfd (1)
Total Liquid, kBPD 292 300 200.5 285.6 285.6 218.5
Produced Water, kBWPD 195 200 15.5 100.6 100.6 200.1
Fresh Water Injection 254 260 204.9 210.8 210.8 102.5
kBWPD
Total Water Injection 356 365 220.4 311.4 311.4 302.6
kBWPD
Gas Lift to wells, Mscfd 73 75 4.7 19.3 19.3 61.3
Gas Lift Compressor 94 96(2) 50.8 96.5 97.1 105.5
Suction, Mscfd
Gas Injection to wells, 73 75(2) 44.7 75.0 75.0 42.4
Mscfd
AGRU Inlet, Mscfd 29 30(3) 30.0 30.0 30.0 20.0
Sulfur Production, TPD 20 20.5(3) 18.2 18.0 12.5 11.5
Gas Flow back from Gas - 30 0 0 0 0
Injection Wells, Mscfd(1)
Notes:
(1) Use compositions in Table 10-4.
(2) Gas Lift and Gas Injection Compressors are sized with a 20% margin to improve facility
availability and to handle swings in fuel gas demand with minimal flaring.
(3) Gas treatment and sulfur recovery systems are sized to handle:
a. Peak fuel gas demand at 60 MW power generation and maximum HRSG steam generation
b. Minimum 1.1% and maximum 1.8% H2S content in AGRU inlet
c. Minimum fuel gas demand during black starts
CI-MHJK-TSJK-00002 Rev 0(110812).doc Page 5 of 5

BANYU URIP
Rev 2
PROJECT
Appendix – 5
WELL FLUID COMPOSITION
TABLE 8-1 ~ TABLE 8-2 – AND TABLE 10-4 ~

URIP Rev 3
10.7.2. Well Fluid Composition

Tables 10-4 and 10-5 below provide the produced hydrocarbon well fluid composition on a dry basis
without gas lift to be used in the design of the CFF. Actual fluid properties may vary. Some variance
should be anticipated and considered in the final detailed design.
TABLE 10 - 4: WELL FLUID COMPOSITION ON A DRY BASIS
Well Fluid Carbonate Producers Clastic Producers Non-Solution Gas(1)

Dry Basis Mole % Mole % Mole %
Hydrogen Sulfide 0.8496% 0.3598% 1.6469%
Methyl-Mercaptan 0.0355% 0.0355% 0.0862%
Carbonyl Sulphide 0.0068% 0.0068% 0.0138%
Carbon Dioxide 21.4209% 18.2823% 43.6731%
Water 0.0000% 0.0000% 0.0125%
Nitrogen 0.0800% 0.2899% 0.1943%
Methane 21.1710% 22.2206% 46.0152%
Ethane 1.6393% 1.4894% 3.3252%
Propane 0.8996% 0.7397% 1.8782%
i-Butane 0.2499% 0.2099% 0.5504%
n-Butane 0.4098% 0.3598% 0.9226%
i-Pentane 0.2299% 0.2399% 0.5515%
n-Pentane 0.2199% 0.2299% 0.5320%
C6* 0.0700% 0.0800% 0.1083%
Methyl- Cyclopentane 0.0200% 0.0200% 0.0185%
Benzene 0.2499% 0.2699% 0.1637%
Cyclohexane 0.0700% 0.0600% 0.0364%
C7* 0.6497% 0.7297% 0.1176%
Methyl- Cyclohexane 0.5198% 0.6097% 0.0619%
Toluene 1.0795% 1.2695% 0.0563%
C8* 0.7697% 0.8197% 0.0231%
Ethyl-Benzene 0.1100% 0.1299% 0.0008%
meta+para-Xylene 0.6997% 0.7797% 0.0034%
ortho-Xylene 0.3698% 0.4098% 0.0014%
C9* 1.2695% 1.4494% 0.0055%
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 0.5698% 0.6297% 0.0003%
C10* 1.5793% 1.8392% 0.0010%
C11+ Frac 1* 2.6889% 2.7888% 0.0002%
C11+ Frac 2* 5.6376% 5.8475% -
C11+ Frac 3* 7.1270% 7.3969% -
C11+ Frac 4* 7.4968% 7.7767% -
C11+ Frac 5* 6.8971% 7.1570% -
C11+ Frac 6* 5.7776% 5.9875% -
C11+ Frac 7* 4.1582% 4.3182% -
C11+ Frac 8* 2.6089% 2.7089% -
C11+ Frac 9* 1.4094% 1.4594% -
C11+ Frac10* 0.9596% 0.9996% -

URIP Rev 3
Notes:
(1) Non-Solution Gas is an assumed composition to be used for design simulations and represents a
weighted average combined composition of about 15% original Clastic cap gas and 85% Case-1
injection gas.
TABLE 10 - 5: MOLECULAR WEIGHT, DENSITY AND CRITICAL PROPERTIES

FOR PSEUDO COMPONENTS
Liq
NBP Tc Pc Vc
Name MW Density Acentricity
[0C] [0C] [kPa] [m3/kgmole]
[kg/m3]
C6* 68.25 86.18 662.5 235.8 3018.6 0.3719 0.2808

C7* 97.66 100.20 686.9 267.9 2726.6 0.4301 0.3331
C8* 124.70 114.23 705.6 296.4 2489.4 0.4878 0.3822
C9* 149.77 128.26 720.5 322.0 2291.6 0.5454 0.4288
C10* 162.58 135.60 837.4 379.9 3623.5 0.4627 0.4123
C11+ Frac 1* 179.83 148.91 827.8 395.0 3249.4 0.5208 0.4571
C11+ Frac 2* 213.37 172.97 837.1 425.5 2861.0 0.6056 0.5271
C11+ Frac 3* 251.54 203.35 846.9 458.5 2503.6 0.7078 0.6071
C11+ Frac 4* 292.02 239.39 856.5 498.7 2190.4 0.8368 0.6751
C11+ Frac 5* 334.80 281.91 865.8 536.7 1823.8 1.0328 0.7489
C11+ Frac 6* 380.27 332.00 874.8 575.8 1510.8 1.2771 0.8326
C11+ Frac 7* 429.01 390.94 883.6 616.7 1257.5 1.5648 0.9349
C11+ Frac 8* 481.35 460.25 890.9 660.0 1065.7 1.8689 1.0721
C11+ Frac 9* 537.72 541.71 896.4 683.5 778.9 2.3671 1.5007
C11+ Frac10* 598.83 637.40 900.2 725.7 582.4 3.1769 1.6781
Table 10-6 below provides an analysis of the initial formation water. With break through of the
injection water and increasing water cuts, the following composition will change over time as it is
diluted with injection water.

URIP Rev 3
TABLE 10 - 6: FORMATION WATER CHEMISTRY

TEST RESULT UNIT METHOD ACCURACY
1. Calcium, Ca 400.7 mg/L AAS 0.01

2. Magnesium, Ma 43.4 mg/L AAS 0.01
3. Sodium, Na 5,344.5 mg/L AAS 0.01
4. Potassium, K 456.4 mg/L AAS 0.01
5. Barium, Ba 0.5 mg/L AAS 0.01
6. Boron, B 84.9 mg/L AAS 0.01
7. Lithium, Li 10.0 mg/L AAS 0.01
8. Manganese, Mn 0.4 mg/L AAS 0.01
9. Soluble Iron, Fe 2.1 mg/L AAS 0.01
10. Insoluble Iron, Fe 3.4 mg/L AAS 0.01
11. Stronium, Sr 36.7 mg/L AAS 0.01
12. Hydroxide, OH NI mg/L Titrimetric 0.1
13. Carbonate, CO2 NI mg/L Titrimetric 0.01
14. Bocarbonate, HCO2 507.5 mg/L Titrimetric 0.01
15. Sulfate, SO4 671.6 mg/L Gravimetric 5.0
16. Chloride, CL 9,473.0 mg/L Titrimetric 0.1
17. Total Alkalinity, CACO3 416.0 mg/L Titrimetric 0.1
18. Nitrate, NO3 0.5 mg/L Spectrometric 0.5
19. Silicate, SiO2 125.3 mg/L AA.5 0.1
20. Sulfite, SO3 29.2 mg/L Titrimetric 0.1
21. TDS (Measured) 18,282 mg/L Gravimetric 1.0
22. TDS (Calculated) 17,185 mg/L Calculation -
o
23. Resistivity @ 77 F 0.37 Ohm-meter Resistivity-meter 0.01
24. Conductivity @ 77 oF 27,027 Umhos/cm Conductivity-meter 1
o
25. Temperature 77 F Thermometer 1
26. PH 7.95 - PH-meter 0.05
27. Dissolved Oxygen <0.1 mg/L Winkler 0.1
28. Total Hardness, CaCO3 1179.7 mg/L AA.5 0.1
29. Turbidity 15 FTU Spectrometric 1.0
30. Oil Content <0.1 mg/L Spectrometric 0.1
o
31. Specific Gravity @ 77 F 1.0116 - Hydrometer -
32. Dissolved Mercury, Hg 0.3 mg/L AA.5 0.002

Chemical System Study Provides Overview of Production and Non-Production Chemicals

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Исходное описание:

Оригинальное название

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Chemical System Study Provides Overview of Production and Non-Production Chemicals

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

IDBC-TS-PRZZZ-C00004

CHEMICAL SYSTEM STUDY 02 Nov 12

REVISION MODIFICATION LOG

Revision Section Description

A All Issued for Review

B All Issued for Approval

0 Page 6 Adding Reference List

Page 7 Adding CFF and PPF in the list of Definition

Page 13 Adding Container and Storage Location in to Table 4 and Table 5.

Page 5 Correct Water Clarifier specification

Page 9 -10 Revise Table 1 as per MCL comments

Page 11 Revise Table 2 as per MCL comments

Page 12 -13 Revise Table 3 as per MCL comments

Appendix-1 Revise Calculation as per MCL comments

2 All Revised based on Vendor’s information and COMPANY’s comment

IDBC-TS-PRZZZ-C00004 Rev 2 CHEMICAL SYSTEM STUDY working.doc

1.1 Production Chemicals ................................................................................................................. 4

5. DESIGN BASIS AND CRITERIA ............................................................................................... 8

5.1 Design Basis ............................................................................................................................... 8

6. CHEMICAL CONSUMPTION ..................................................................................................... 9

6.1 Chemical Flammability and Toxicity.......................................................................................... 13

7. CHEMICAL STORAGE ............................................................................................................ 14

IDBC-TS-PRZZZ-C00004 Rev 2 CHEMICAL SYSTEM STUDY working.doc

1.1 Production Chemicals

- Pour Point Depressant

 To aid separation process of the oil and water

- Antifoam (Oil Treatment Type)

 To avoid plugging due to uncontrolled scale deposition

- Paraffin / Wax Inhibitor

 Preventing or inhibiting wax formation in export pipeline

1.2 Non-Production Chemicals

IDBC-TS-PRZZZ-C00004 Rev 2 CHEMICAL SYSTEM STUDY working.doc

- Antifoam (Water Treatment Type)

 Injected to control foam formation in the water deaerators

- Antifoam (Amine Treatment Type)

- Additional Chemicals for pH Neutralization and Control

- Hydrochloric Acid (HCl)

 To clean Hypochlorite generation package system.

- Sodium Hydroxide (NaOH)

IDBC-TS-PRZZZ-C00004 Rev 2 CHEMICAL SYSTEM STUDY working.doc

 For BFW treatment and Condensate Polishing Unit , bed regeneration

 For Hypochlorite generation package , chemical cleaning

 For Reverse Osmosis Unit , UF backwashing and RO chemical cleaning

 For BFW treatment and Condensate Polishing Unit , bed regeneration

 For Reverse Osmosis Unit , UF backwashing and RO chemical cleaning

 To remove chlorine to prevent oxidation of membrane at the RO unit

- Calcium Chloride (CaCl2)

 To maintain salt level of WHO drinking water quality

- Sodium Bicarbonate (NaHCO3)

 To maintain salt level of WHO drinking water quality

IDBC-TS-PRZZZ-C00004 Rev 2 CHEMICAL SYSTEM STUDY working.doc

[6] EXHIBIT A – SCOPE OF WORK EPC1: PRODUCTION PROCESSING

CONTRACTOR/PURCHASER CONTRACTOR is defined as MCL’s appointed

VENDOR/SUPPLIER VENDOR is defined as the company selected to supply the

CFF Central Field Facility

CPF Central Processing Facility

IDBC-TS-PRZZZ-C00004 Rev 2 CHEMICAL SYSTEM STUDY working.doc

CI Corrosion Inhibitor, Scale Inhibitor

CP Pour Point Depressant (PPD)

CS Scavenger (H2S, O2)

CZ Acids (Sulfuric Acid, Hydrochloric Acid)

GTG Gas Turbine Generator