Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Special Article
From Coronary Care Units to Cardiac Intensive Care
Units: Recommendations for Organizational, Staffing,
and Educational Transformation
Michel Le May, MD,a Sean van Diepen, MD,b Mark Liszkowski, MD,c Gregory Schnell, MD,d
Jean-François Tanguay, MD,c Christopher B. Granger, MD,e Craig Ainsworth, MD,f
Jean G. Diodati, MD,g Neil Fam, MD,h Richard Haichin, MD,i Davinder Jassal, MD,j
Christopher Overgaard, MD,k Wayne Tymchak, MD,b Benjamin Tyrrell, MD,l
Christina Osborne, BSc,a and Graham Wong, MDm
a
Ottawa Heart Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
b
Mazankowski Heart Institute, University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada
c
Montreal Heart Institute, University of Montreal, Montreal, Que bec, Canada
d
Libin Cardiovascular Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
e
Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
f
Hamilton General Hospital, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
g
Hôpital du Sacre -Coeur de Montre al, University of Montreal, Montreal, Que bec, Canada
h
St Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
i
McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Que bec, Canada
j
St Boniface General Hospital, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
k
University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
l
Royal Alexandra Hospital, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
m
Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada
ABSTRACT
RESUM
E
Medical care in Canadian cardiac units has changed considerably over pondre aux besoins de plus en plus complexes et diversifie
Afin de re s
the past 3 decades in response to an increasingly complex and diverse des patients souffrant d’un problème cardiaque aigu, les soins
patient population admitted with acute cardiac pathology. To maintain medicaux prodigue
s dans les unite
s de cardiologie canadiennes ont
the highest level of care for these patients, there is a pressing need to rablement e
conside volue
au cours des trois dernières de cennies.
evolve traditional coronary care units into contemporary cardiac Cependant, si nous voulons continuer d’offrir les meilleurs soins
In 2013, a cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) workshop emphasized the increasingly important role of critical care
conducted by Canadian coronary care unit (CCU) directors at medicine in CCUs. It became evident that a “position paper”
the Canadian Cardiovascular Society meeting highlighted the (or a scientific statement) was necessary to guide our Canadian
change in the landscape of the traditional CCU, and institutions. Hence, a national Working Group was formed
that included cardiologists with an interest in critical care
Received for publication August 10, 2015. Accepted November 26, 2015.
medicine, 3 physicians with dual certification in cardiology
Corresponding author: Dr Michel Le May, Ottawa Heart Institute, 40 and critical care medicine, and a coauthor on the scientific
Ruskin St, Ottawa, Ontario K1Y 4W7, Canada. Tel.: þ1-613-761-4223;
fax: þ1-613-761-4690.
statement from the American Heart Association (AHA).1
E-mail: mlemay@ottawaheart.ca Finally, as part of the internal review process, the Working
See page 1211 for disclosure information. Group solicited the input of various Canadian leaders, the
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2015.11.021
0828-282X/Ó 2016 Canadian Cardiovascular Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Le May et al. 1205
Canadian Cardiac Intensive Care Units
intensive care units. In this article we aim to highlight the current possible aux patients, les unite s de soins coronariens traditionnelles
variations in Canadian units, develop approaches to overcome logis- devront se muer en unite s de soins intensifs cardiaques plus con-
tical and infrastructural obstacles, and propose staffing and training temporaines. Dans cet article, nous voulions faire ressortir les diffe-
recommendations that would allow for the establishment of contem- rences actuelles caracte risant les unites de soins canadiennes,
porary cardiac intensive care units. developper des approches visant à surmonter les obstacles lie s à la
logistique et à l’infrastructure et recommander des modifications en
matière de dotation en personnel et de formation ne cessaires à
tablissement d’unite
l’e s de soins intensifs cardiaques à la fine pointe
de la modernite.
Canadian Association of Interventional Cardiology, the CA- physicians will need to formally embrace the guidelines
Nadian CARdiovascular Critical CarE Society, and fellows in adhered to by established critical care organizations such as the
the process of training in critical care cardiology. Canadian Critical Care Society and the Society of Critical
Care Medicine into the planned structure of the evolving
CICU.4-6
The primary objective of this article was to establish how
Overview
contemporary Canadian CCUs can optimally serve an
Acute cardiac care has evolved since the advent of CCUs in
increasingly heterogeneous and complex population of cardiac
the early 1960s. Although the original CCU was specifically
patients, identify strategies needed to transform current Ca-
designed to admit patients with acute myocardial infarction
nadian CCUs into units capable of critical care management
who might need timely defibrillation, the modern CICU is
(ie, CICUs), and propose initial suggestions and recommen-
now admits a variety of increasingly complex cardiac patients
dations to achieve this end. A more comprehensive evaluation
commonly complicated by multisystem organ failure.2 A
of issues related to other critical care units such as medical
detailed historical perspective of the evolution of the CCU is
intensive care units (MICUs) and cardiac surgical intensive
provided (see the Historical Perspective: Evolution of Cardiac
care units was beyond the scope of this article.
Monitoring section of the Supplementary Material).
In addition to acute coronary syndromes, reasons for
admission now include: (1) management of cardiogenic shock;
(2) hemodynamic support for decompensated heart failure Similarities and Differences Between CICUs and
and transplant evaluation; (3) target temperature management MICUs
after cardiac arrest; (4) diagnosis and management of complex The level of acuity in most Canadian tertiary care units has
arrhythmias including implanted cardiac defibrillator mal- risen to a level at which similarities now exist between our
function; (5) hemodynamic evaluation and initiation of novel modern CICU and a traditional MICU. However, clinically
medical therapy for severe pulmonary hypertension; (6) important differences exist between patients admitted to the
monitoring after percutaneous intervention for structural MICU and the CICU. The primary reason for admission to
heart disease; (7) management of decompensated complex the CICU is almost always an acute cardiac illness. In general,
adult congenital heart disease; and (8) complicated in the MICU a more diverse population of patients admitted
endocarditis. for conditions such as septic shock, respiratory failure, trauma,
This shift in CCU admissions of various critical cardiac or postoperative complications are monitored. Many of these
problems also has been accompanied by a host of critical conditions are now more typically present in current CICU
noncardiac problems, which has increased the need for critical patients.
care expertise among attending physicians. This situation now Current variability in the resources and infrastructure of
requires a balanced approach to patient care including advanced some centres commonly requires that patients admitted in the
modes of respiratory care, renal replacement support, neuro- CCU with an acute cardiac illness require transfer to the
protection and neuro-optimization, concomitant treatment of MICU (ie, need for mechanical ventilation). These patients
multisource infections, and enhanced nutritional support. then usually fall under the care of an intensivist. Care of many
This evolution of critical care cardiology and the need to of these patients could alternatively be directed within the
transform the CCU has been acknowledged by the AHA.1 confines of an evolved CICU by a cardiologist trained in
Accordingly, within the concept of a critical care-enabled critical care medicine. However, although the Royal College
CCU, it is increasingly evident that attending cardiologists of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada (RCPSC) provides
will require further training and expertise in critical care training objectives in adult critical care medicine and certifi-
medicine. Recently the American College of Cardiology Core cation to physicians who have successfully completed the
Cardiovascular Training Statement-4 Task Force reported on program, it does not currently provide subspecialty training
the standards needed for competency in critical care cardiol- and certification for critical care cardiology.
ogy.3 With that said, many logistical and infrastructural ob- Importantly, the training and experience of several health
stacles must be addressed before the evolution of CCUs to care disciplines is often required to manage critically ill pa-
CICUs can be fully implemented across Canada. tients. The Writing Group believes that collaboration between
In the context of an evolving CICU, the Working Group CICUs and MICUs would be mutually beneficial to ensure
believes that it will be important to integrate the best practices that optimal patient care is maintained and that clinical re-
of critical care and cardiovascular medicine. As such, sources are optimally distributed and allocated. Management
1206 Canadian Journal of Cardiology
Volume 32 2016
Level 3 Level 3
Proposed CICU Classification CICU CICU
Because of the diversity in CICU clinical practices, acute
care volumes, and resource availability across Canada, it is
unrealistic to expect that all CICUs adopt the same level of Level 2 Level Level 2
CICU
staffing, training, and organizational structures. However, we CICU 1 CICU
do recommend that each city or region develop a hub and
Level 3
spoke referral system(s) for acute cardiac care, in which the CICU
Level 3
care of the most critically ill cardiac patients is centralized in CICU
high-volume centres capable of providing high intensity and
Level 2
comprehensive care for critically ill cardiac patients (Fig. 2). CICU
We propose a 3-tiered CICU classification system (Table 1)
similar to the American College of Surgeons trauma centre
classification system and to the model described in the AHA Level 3
CICU
Level 3
CICU
scientific statement on critical care cardiology.1,7
This classification system could: (1) help provinces, re-
gions, and/or cities set up regional hub and spoke care net- Figure 2. Hub and spoke cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) regional
works; (2) guide individual CICUs in the development of care networks.
optimal staffing, training, and educational care plans to meet
the clinical needs of their population; (3) guide the develop-
ment of a future framework for CICU accreditation; and (4) individual physician volumes affect patient outcomes.8-15 The
assist in the rationalization of costly critical care resources to primary goal in centralizing the care of critically ill cardiac
the best possible sites. patients is to concentrate expertise and resources to ensure
adequate volumes to promote superior clinical outcomes
Level 1 CICU across a broad range of complex acute cardiac pathologies.
A level 1 CICU should have the staffing, training, on-site Medical staffing of level 1 CICUs will play an important
medical resources, and the medical technologies to centralize role in the unit transformation and patient care. The physician
comprehensive care for all cardiac conditions including the who leads the unit should be a cardiologist who has the
most acutely ill cardiovascular patients. The standards and necessary education and training in cardiovascular disease to
technologies in these units should mirror those in a general optimally meet CICU patient care needs. We propose that
intensive care unit or a large tertiary cardiovascular centre. future level 1 CICU cardiology recruits have either dual cer-
Moreover, these select centres ought to serve as tertiary referral tification in cardiology and intensive care or a minimum of 1
centres within regional systems of care. Reasons to support year of dedicated critical care training (see the section on
this model come from data that indicate that institutional and Pathways to Critical Care Cardiology Training) after their
cardiology residency (CICU intensivist).
An in-house physician, medical resident, or advanced nurse
practitioner with acute cardiac life support training should be
available at all times, as should consultation with an attending
CICU physician.
Cardiologist Nonphysician staffing should also reflect standards in
or Intensivist critical care units (see the Nursing Intensity and Allied Health
Cardiologist- Professional Staffing section of the Supplementary Material).
Intensivist
Optimal nurse to patient ratios should be 1:1-1:2, dependent
on patient acuity.16-18 The unit should have a clinical
IInternist
nterni
ern st pharmacist,19-21 a respiratory therapist,22,23 and access to
physical therapy,24 occupational therapy,24 nutritional sup-
port,25 and social work services.26,27
Each unit should also develop standardized protocols, with
Medical and Surgical Consultants, Nurses, a particular focus on critical care evidence-based care strategies
Pharmacists, Physical/OccupaƟonal/Respiratory (see the Standardized Treatment Protocols and Prevention sec-
Therapists, DieƟcians, and Social Workers tion of the Supplementary Material). Although specific evi-
dence from CICUs is largely lacking, we encourage the
adoption of existing best evidence from critical care medicine.
Figure 1. Collaborative care model for cardiac patients admitted to Units should be leaders in resident and cardiology trainee
cardiac intensive care units and intensive care units. education, and academic centres might choose to develop
Le May et al. 1207
Canadian Cardiac Intensive Care Units
Volume 32 2016
Transfer complex and
critically ill patient to
level 1 centre
Le May et al. 1209
Canadian Cardiac Intensive Care Units
and reporting
for common
CICU, cardiac intensive care unit; CLI, central line infection; RN, registered nurse; VAP, ventilator acquired pneumonia; VTE, venous thromboembolism.
(before transfer to
temporary pacing
Noninvasive cardiac
Transvenous
level 1 or 2 CICU.
In light of the growing medical complexity among CICU
patients, it is anticipated that the future CICU physician will
24/7 In-house physician,
Other resources available
coverage
transfer of complex
management of all
emergencies with
to level 1 centre
All acute coronary
responsible physician.
syndromes
diagnoses:
noncardiac complications. Hence, we concur with the Euro- Pathways to Critical Care Cardiology Training
pean Society of Cardiology and AHA recommendations that Cardiovascular organizations worldwide have advocated for
CICU cardiologists receive formal extended training in critical changes in CICU physician training.1,41 In Canada, there are
care.1,41 currently no recognized pathways or training standards toward
critical care cardiology certification. Herein, we propose 2
possible pathways (Table 2) toward specialized critical care
Continuing Medical Education and training in Canada: either dual certification in cardiology and
Competencies critical care or a minimum of 1 year of dedicated critical care
We endorse the development and adoption of a formal training after cardiology residency (CICU intensivist). The
continuing medical education (CME) curriculum as an foundation of both pathways will necessarily involve the
essential aspect in the evolution of modern Canadian CICUs. RCPSC and would follow formal cardiology subspecialty
CME will help bring current CICU physicians in line with certification.
modern critical care medicine but also ensure that all CICU First, dual certification as a cardiologist-intensivist is
physicians maintain competencies in critical care cardiology. It possible. Currently, this is the only formal RCPSC-recognized
is hoped that CICUs gain certification in the future through pathway to prepare trainees to work in CICUs and ICUs, and
the RCPSC Areas of Focused Competency Program. An requires the completion of a 2-year RCPSC-accredited critical
RCPSC Areas of Focused Competency status could then care fellowship after a 3-year RCPSC cardiology fellowship.
promote the development and application of national Dual certification in this way would ultimately provide all of
accreditation standards to all CICU physicians. Finally, to the technical skills and practice knowledge expected of a
maintain “best practice care,” the ongoing competency general cardiologist/intensivist. If successful, this pathway
assessment of CICUs will require gathering and acting on would provide trainees with RCPSC certification in critical
clinical practice data (see the Quality Improvement Initiatives care and cardiology, and allow for clinical practice in cardiac
section of the Supplementary Material). These data will assist and general intensive care units.
in: However, the Writing Group recognizes that a focused
1. Clarification of guidelines for admission to level 1, level 2, year of critical care training might be sufficient to meet the
and level 3 CICUs; patient care needs in contemporary level 1 and 2 CICUs. At
2. Improvement of resource and personnel allocation; present, the University of Alberta has the only established
3. Assessment of clinical outcomes and length of stay; CICU critical care program in Canada.42 However, because of
4. Assessment of patient and family satisfaction; the lack of national standards to underpin this program, we
5. Assessment and implementation of novel techniques and advocate for the development of a formal standardized CICU
technology; and critical care fellowship. Ideally this would include 1 clinical
6. To foster and optimize relationships with other health care year after RCPSC certification in cardiology with broad crit-
units (MICU, Emergency Department, medical ward) and ical care exposure (Table 2) administered by a joint critical
relevant consultants. care and cardiology program. Trainees would acquire many of
the same technical skills as physicians with dual certification
and would be certified to work in CICUs but not in general
critical care units. Ultimately the development and imple-
Current CICU Attending Physicians
mentation of such national standards, as done with other
The process of training new cardiologists with the addi-
traditional cardiology fellowships, would provide the best
tional expertise in critical care medicine will take time. Many
avenue to train most of the future CICU cardiac intensivists
current CICU physicians are experienced, committed, and
in Canada. To meet these goals, discussions and collaboration
competent cardiologists who have recognized expertise that
between the RCPSC and critical care training programs (ie,
has evolved with changing CICU needs. Although they might
‘joint programs’) will likely be needed to accommodate
not be formally trained in critical care, they will continue to
additional trainees.
be an integral part of care for these patients while upcoming
attending physicians are trained. These physicians should
actively maintain and further develop the knowledge and
Conclusions and Future Directions
skills necessary to deliver ongoing CICU care. The following
Over the past half century, the CCU has evolved from a
suggestions are made in an attempt to ensure adequate
unit highly focused on acute myocardial infarction arrhythmia
exposure for these physicians in the area of critical care
monitoring into a medically complex unit that provides
cardiology:
increasingly complex critical care to patients who present with
1. Institutions should establish collaborative care or consul- a primary cardiac illness. This shift in care was driven in part
tation standards for the most critically ill patients; by the increasing number of acutely ill cardiac patients who
2. Individuals should maintain basic critical care skills (ie, populate modern CICUs, and also in part by the development
acute cardiac life support certification, basic airway man- and use of highly specialized medical and therapeutic critical
agement skills, basic echocardiography, and procedural care technologies. This new clinical paradigm requires an
skills including central line placement and temporary organizational, staffing, and training transformation of our
pacemaker insertion); and CICUs.
3. Individuals should maintain a minimum of 15 hours of We endorse the concept of development of regional cardiac
critical care CME a year; this might also be in the form of a care systems and the centralization of critical and complex
critical care track at a national cardiology meeting. cardiac patients into level 1 and level 2 centres staffed with
Le May et al. 1211
Canadian Cardiac Intensive Care Units
7. DiRusso S, Holly C, Kamath R, et al. Preparation and achievement improvement of nutrition therapy: the intensive care unit dietitian can
of American College of Surgeons level I trauma verification raises make the difference. Crit Care Med 2012;40:412-9.
hospital performance and improves patient outcome. J Trauma
2001;51:294-9. 26. Davidson JE, Powers K, Hedayat KM, et al. Clinical practice guidelines
for support of the family in the patient-centered intensive care unit:
8. Walkey AJ, Wiener RS. Hospital case volume and outcomes among American College of Critical Care Medicine Task Force 2004-2005. Crit
patients hospitalized with severe sepsis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med Care Med 2007;35:605-22.
2014;189:548-55.
27. Brilli RJ, Spevetz A, Branson RD, et al. Critical care delivery in the
9. Tu JV, Austin PC, Chan BT. Relationship between annual volume of intensive care unit: defining clinical roles and the best practice model.
patients treated by admitting physician and mortality after acute Crit Care Med 2001;29:2007-19.
myocardial infarction. JAMA 2001;285:3116-22.
28. Kahn JM, Linde-Zwirble WT, Wunsch H, et al. Potential value of
10. Ross JS, Normand SL, Wang Y, et al. Hospital volume and 30-day regionalized intensive care for mechanically ventilated medical patients.
mortality for three common medical conditions. N Engl J Med Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2008;177:285-91.
2010;362:1110-8.
29. Nathens AB, Jurkovich GJ, Maier RV, et al. Relationship between
11. Kahn JM, Goss CH, Heagerty PJ, et al. Hospital volume and the out- trauma center volume and outcomes. JAMA 2001;285:1164-71.
comes of mechanical ventilation. N Engl J Med 2006;355:41-50.
30. Nichol G, Aufderheide TP, Eigel B, et al. Regional systems of care for
12. Hannan EL, Wu C, Walford G, et al. Volume-outcome relationships for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a policy statement from the American
percutaneous coronary interventions in the stent era. Circulation Heart Association. Circulation 2010;121:709-29.
2005;112:1171-9.
31. Henry TD, Gibson CM, Pinto DS. Moving toward improved care
13. Finks JF, Osborne NH, Birkmeyer JD. Trends in hospital volume and for the patient with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a mandate
operative mortality for high-risk surgery. N Engl J Med 2011;364: for systems of care. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2010;3:
2128-37. 441-3.
14. Dimick JB, Upchurch GR Jr. Endovascular technology, hospital volume, 32. Kushner FG, Hand M, Smith SC Jr, et al. 2009 Focused Updates: ACC/
and mortality with abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery. J Vasc Surg AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation
2008;47:1150-4. Myocardial Infarction (updating the 2004 Guideline and 2007
15. Lin HC, Xirasagar S, Chen CH, Hwang YT. Physician’s case volume of Focused Update) and ACC/AHA/SCAI Guidelines on Percutaneous
intensive care unit pneumonia admissions and in-hospital mortality. Am Coronary Intervention (updating the 2005 Guideline and 2007 Focused
J Respir Crit Care Med 2008;177:989-94. Update): a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/
American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circu-
16. Pronovost PJ, Dang D, Dorman T, et al. Intensive care unit nurse lation 2009;120:2271-306.
staffing and the risk for complications after abdominal aortic surgery. Eff
Clin Pract 2001;4:199-206. 33. Shahian DM, O’Brien SM, Normand SL, Peterson ED,
Edwards FH. Association of hospital coronary artery bypass volume
17. Penoyer DA. Nurse staffing and patient outcomes in critical care: a with processes of care, mortality, morbidity, and the Society of
concise review. Crit Care Med 2010;38:1521-8. Thoracic Surgeons composite quality score. J Thorac Cardiovasc
Surg 2010;139:273-82.
18. Kane RL, Shamliyan TA, Mueller C, Duval S, Wilt TJ. The association
of registered nurse staffing levels and patient outcomes: systematic review 34. The Leapfrog group. ICU Physician Staffing. Available at: http://www.
and meta-analysis. Med Care 2007;45:1195-204. leapfroggroup.org/56440/SurveyInfo/leapfrog_safety_practices/icu_physician_
staffing. Accessed May 7, 2014.
19. MacLaren R, Bond CA, Martin SJ, Fike D. Clinical and economic
outcomes of involving pharmacists in the direct care of critically ill pa- 35. Pronovost PJ, Angus DC, Dorman T, et al. Physician staffing patterns
tients with infections. Crit Care Med 2008;36:3184-9. and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients: a systematic review. JAMA
2002;288:2151-62.
20. Kaboli PJ, Hoth AB, McClimon BJ, Schnipper JL. Clinical pharmacists
and inpatient medical care: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med 36. Multz AS, Chalfin DB, Samson IM, et al. A “closed” medical
2006;166:955-64. intensive care unit (MICU) improves resource utilization when
compared with an “open” MICU. Am J Respir Crit Care Med
21. Leape LL, Cullen DJ, Clapp MD, et al. Pharmacist participation on
1998;157:1468-73.
physician rounds and adverse drug events in the intensive care unit.
JAMA 1999;282:267-70. 37. Carson SS, Stocking C, Podsadecki T, et al. Effects of organiza-
tional change in the medical intensive care unit of a teaching
22. Kollef MH, Shapiro SD, Silver P, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of
hospital: a comparison of ‘open’ and ‘closed’ formats. JAMA
protocol-directed versus physician-directed weaning from mechanical
1996;276:322-8.
ventilation. Crit Care Med 1997;25:567-74.
38. Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Information by
23. Ely EW, Bennett PA, Bowton DL, et al. Large scale implementation of a
Discipline. Available at: http://www.royalcollege.ca/rc/faces/oracle/
respiratory therapist-driven protocol for ventilator weaning. Am J Respir
webcenter/portalapp/pages/ibd.jspx;jsessionid¼lo7akGFJob-1n5NH8iPB
Crit Care Med 1999;159:439-46.
qDvhXjlBookKQjep8CYslLdu1nnCJqQC!-398589652?lang¼en&_afrLoop¼
24. Schweickert WD, Pohlman MC, Pohlman AS, et al. Early phys- 15145067894894674&_afrWindowMode¼0&_afrWindowId¼null#%40%3F_
ical and occupational therapy in mechanically ventilated, critically afrWindowId%3Dnull%26_afrLoop%3D15145067894894674%26lang%3Den
ill patients: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2009;373: %26_afrWindowMode%3D0%26_adf.ctrl-state%3Dxfsijyqeb_4. Accessed May
1874-82. 7, 2014.
25. Soguel L, Revelly JP, Schaller MD, Longchamp C, Berger MM. Energy 39. Reynolds HN, Haupt MT, Thill-Baharozian MC, Carlson RW.
deficit and length of hospital stay can be reduced by a two-step quality Impact of critical care physician staffing on patients with septic shock
Le May et al. 1213
Canadian Cardiac Intensive Care Units
in a university hospital medical intensive care unit. JAMA 1988;260: 42. University of Alberta. Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry. Division of Critical
3446-50. Care Medicine. Fellowship Training. Available at: http://www.critical.
med.ualberta.ca/en/Education/FellowshipTraining.aspx. Accessed May
40. Dimick JB, Pronovost PJ, Heitmiller RF, Lipsett PA. Intensive care unit 8, 2014.
physician staffing is associated with decreased length of stay, hospital cost,
and complications after esophageal resection. Crit Care Med 2001;29:
753-8.
Supplementary Material
To access the supplementary material accompanying this
41. Hasin Y, Danchin N, Filippatos GS, et al. Recommendations for the article, visit the online version of the Canadian Journal of
structure, organization, and operation of intensive cardiac care units. Eur Cardiology at www.onlinecjc.ca and at http://dx.doi.org/10.
Heart J 2005;26:1676-82. 1016/j.cjca.2015.11.021.