Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
FACTS:
The School assails the legitimacy of the Union and its right to file a petition for certificate
election because there were signatories in the petition who are already resigned, there were
employees who signed twice and there is commingling of rank-and-file and supervisory
employees which is prohibited in forming unions.
ISSUE:
The propriety of PTLAP-PIGLAS to file for certification election.
LAW:
1. Labor Code of the Philippines, Title IV Labor Organizations, Chapter I Registration and
Cancellation
2. Omnibus Rules in Implementing the Labor Code
CASE HISTORY:
RULING:
The concepts of a union and of a legitimate labor organization are different from, but related to,
the concept of a bargaining unit.
Article 212(g) of the Labor Code defines a labor organization as "any union or association of
employees which exists in whole or in part for the purpose of collective bargaining or of dealing
with employers concerning terms and conditions of employment." Upon compliance with all the
documentary requirements, the Regional Office or Bureau shall issue in favor of the applicant
labor organization a certificate indicating that it is included in the roster of legitimate labor
organizations. Any applicant labor organization shall acquire legal personality and shall be entitled
to the rights and privileges granted by law to legitimate labor organizations upon issuance of the
certificate of registration.
In case of alleged inclusion of disqualified employees in a union, the proper procedure for an
employer like petitioner is to directly file a petition for cancellation of the union’s certificate of
registration due to misrepresentation, false statement or fraud under the circumstances
enumerated in Article 239 of the Labor Code, as amended.
BALITAO, MARIEL RATANI C.
Case Digest in Labor II (Labor Relations) under Usec. JBJ
To reiterate, private respondent, having been validly issued a certificate of registration, should be
considered as having acquired juridical personality which may not be attacked collaterally.
On the other hand, a bargaining unit has been defined as a "group of employees of a given
employer, comprised of all or less than all of the entire body of employees, which the collective
interests of all the employees, consistent with equity to the employer, indicated to be best suited
to serve reciprocal rights and duties of the parties under the collective bargaining provisions of
the law."
In determining the proper collective bargaining unit and what unit would be appropriate to be the
collective bargaining agency, the Court mentioned several factors that should be considered, to
wit: (1) will of employees (Globe Doctrine); (2) affinity and unity of employees' interest, such as
substantial similarity of work and duties, or similarity of compensation and working conditions; (3)
prior collective bargaining history; and (4) employment status, such as temporary, seasonal and
probationary employees.
The test of the grouping is community or mutuality of interest, because “the basic test of an
asserted bargaining unit's acceptability is whether or not it is fundamentally the combination which
will best assure to all employees the exercise of their collective bargaining rights."
OPINION:
I concur with the overall ruling that the commingling of supervisory employees and rank-
and-file employees does not affect the legitimacy of PTLAP-PIGLAS and its right to file a petition
for certification election.
Doing so is the proper as it meets the ends of justice and runs in consonance with the
intention of the law in protecting labor.