Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Almallam Boujemaa
Characterization Techniques in Lorraine Hansberry’s A Raisin in the Sun (1959) and August
Both Loraine Hansberry’s A Raisin in the Sun (1959) whose protagonist is a female
character, Lena Younger and August Wilson’s play, Fences (1985) whose main character is
Troy Maxon, depict several social, economic and cultural concerns of Modern American
Literature in general and drama in particular. Hansberry’s play is probably one of the first
plays that gives an identity to the African American theatre and portrays the sufferings of
people from African American descent. The play has also paved the way for many other
dramatic works that deal with the plight of blacks in the United States. A few years later,
August Wilson followed the steps of Hansberry and addressed nearly the same predicaments
discussed in A Raisin in the Sun. This paper sets out to carry out a comparative reading of
Lorraine Hansberry’s play A Raisin in the Sun (1959) and August Wilson’s Fences (1985) in
order to show how characterization techniques are used by both playwrights. On this basis, a
number of characterization techniques shall be taken into consideration while dealing with
both plays, notably authorial characterization, characters’ opinions and thoughts, and
language.
Characters are fundamental elements in drama and theatre; they build up the plot
through movement, interactions and actions. Plays would not have come into existence
without characters. Hence, characters require close attention so that we can see their
ALMALLAM 2
importance in the makeup of the dramatic work, notably plays. Aristotle in his Poetics
postulates that character “holds a second place after the plot” (5). He maintains that
tragedyi is the imitation of an action, and the action implies personal agents,
thought and character- are the two natural causes from which actions spring,
The role of character in drama and theatre is thus crucial. A dramatic work can’t exist without
personal agents whose main attributes include thought and character. The success and the
failure of a play or a dramatic work are dependent upon these agents. Besides, these personal
agents don’t stand in isolation in the dramatic work, but their role is fulfilled when they
Characters can generally be divided into “major characters and minor characters,
depending on how important they are to the plot” (Lethbridge and Mildorf 113). Lethbridge
and Mildorf also argue that what indicates whether or not a character is major or minor is
threefold: the amount of time allocated to the character, the presence on the stage and the
amount of speech (113). A major character thus shows up on the stage for a long time and
dominates talk, whereas secondary or minor characters spend less time on the stage and talk
less, and are as a result peripheral. These minor characters, though marginal, contribute in the
shaping of the play, in revealing certain traits about other characters, and in the development
of the plot as a whole. For the reader to discern the traits of each character, playwrights
usually resort to certain techniques to unveil the attitudes, and the characteristics of
characters. This can be done either through dialogue, stage directions, or when characters talk
about themselves.
ALMALLAM 3
For the reader to discern the traits of each character, playwrights usually resort to
certain techniques to develop their dramatic persona and to reveal the characteristics of
characters. This can be done through various techniques. We can distinguish between
in stage directions, figural characterization in which other characters describe and comment
and figural characterization can be rendered explicit and implicit. The author for instance
The author may also reveal information about his characters implicitly through “contrasts,
names and correspondences” ( Lethbridge and Mildorf 117). Figural characterization can also
language, masks and costumes, stage props, setting, behavior, voice, language (style register,
dialect, etc) and topics one discusses”( Lethbridge and Mildorf 117)
Characterization techniques are the media through which we get into the depth of the
character. Stage directions are “useful guidelines, generally written in italics, are provided by
the dramatist to help the reader to read the dialogue. They help to visualize the play” (Castex
and Jumeau 64). Although stage directions offer clues to the reader to fathom certain qualities
of characters, they are still inadequate. Dialogues, also referred to as dramatic language,
provide the reader with situations in which the characters interact. These interactions, actions
and reactions of characters reveal many aspects of the character, including its psychological,
social, cultural, and economic background. In this regard, Castex and Jumeau attest that “we
can’t expect too much from stage directions since they are absent in some plays. They must be
derived or inferred from dialogue…, which provides clues, characters discuss each other, their
situation, and their surroundings” (64). In the same vein, Letwin & Joe and Stockdale
maintain that “the character of a fictional person in a play … is judged by her actions. The
ALMALLAM 4
role is characterized by an objective analysis of what the author says about the person in stage
directions, about what others say about her, and what she says about herself” (51). In short,
stage directions, dialogues and self-characterization all contribute to enlighten the reader
about the traits and the status of the character and how the playwright develops his or her
the Sun and Fences for example, both playwrights introduce their characters by telling the
names of characters, via other character or by means of stage directions. For instance, the
reader or the viewer knows George Murchison through another character, Beneatha. She
answers Mama who asked her “who you going out with tomorrow night?” “George
Murchison” Beneatha answered. (Hansberry 127). Besides, we identify Mama when the
playwright tells us her name when he describes the house of the Younger family in the
beginning of scene one. Afterwards, the playwright provides a detailed description of Mama
in lengthy stage directions and prose-like language. We realize the physical traits of Mama,
her age, and some of her personality characteristics. Troy Maxon, the protagonist of Fences is
introduced to the reader directly at the outset. The reader recognizes that Troy Maxon is
“fifty-three years old, a large man, with tick, heavy hands…together with his blackness, his
largeness informs his sensibilities and the choices he has made in his life” (Wilson 2412).
This description of Troy gives hints to the reader that Troy is a laborer and that the work he
does requires physical strength. Telling names and stage directions provide some traits of the
characters in both plays, yet the information they provide are inadequate for an in-depth
character. Thoughts and opinions of character, however, can make up for these inadequacies.
Hansberry’s characters embrace conflicting opinions and thoughts as what to do with the
ALMALLAM 5
insurance money that whole family is expecting. These opinions and thoughts divulge the
ambition and dreams of each member of the family except Travis. We recognize that Walter
is money-maniac and wants to invest the money in a liquor store, Beneatha wants to use part
of the money to pay for her Medical school, Mama’s dream is taking the family to a bigger
house, and Ruth urges Mama to go on a vacation. These diverging opinions tell us a lot about
the characters: Walter’s eagerness to set up his own business and make big money,
Beneatha’s intellectual interests, and Mama’s desire to protect and keep her family under one
roof. Likewise, Wilson’s Characters are introduced and recognized through their contrasting
opinions and thoughts. Troy, the protagonist of Fences, seems to embrace radical opinions.
When he recognizes that Cory dreams of pursuing football or college, he simply does not
accept the idea on the grounds that “the white man ain’t gonna let him get nowhere with that
football” (Wilson 2416). His friend Bono and his wife Rose remind him that times have
changed. Rose says “they got lot of colored boys playing ball now. Baseball and football”
(Wilson 2416). Bono shares the same opinion with Rose. Troy, however insists on what he
believes. This exchange between these characters reveals that Troy is adamant in his refusal to
change his mind concerning Cory’s joining of a football team. It also shows that Troy’s
experience with the white man in the past affects his present negatively. Opinions and thought
key to the social status of the character. A close examination of both plays demonstrates that
Hansberry’s play employs language to give us hints about the educational background and
social status of the character. We notice that Youngers tend to use regional dialects since the
family lives in the South of Chicago. In her play, Hansberry informs us that Mama slurs
speech. It is also noticeable that the majority of the family members tend to elide the verb to
be while speaking. Their language also lacks grammar accuracy. This denotes that the family
ALMALLAM 6
comes from the working class. Beneatha’s language, however, besides Asagai’s and
Murchison’s is formal and refined, which implies their educational background. In Fences,
characters use the same dominant jargon in A raisin in the Sun. We notice that all the family
members speak informal language, which again tells us about the social standing of the family
In sum, August Wilson and Lorraine Hansberry have used the techniques of
they provide to introduce characters, opinions and thoughts of the characters also help us to
recognize the characteristics of the dramatic persona, and ultimately language as a key to
social and educational background is very telling in the sense that it reveals the social and
economic status of both families. Hansberry and Wilson have generally adopted the above
use of language is not completely informal. This implies that there is a new generation of
Footnotes
i
The concept of tragedy has gained a new meaning with the evolution of modern drama to include the tragedy
of the modern common man. Modern dramatists like August Wilson and Lorraine Hansberry published works
that deal with the plight of the common man. Tragedy does not exclusively depict the ordeals and the tragic
flaws of an elevated aristocratic kingly character.
Works Cited
Aristotle. Poetics, 350BC. Trans. S.H Butcher. A Universal Download Edition , 1902.
Castex, Peggy, and Alain Jumeau. Les Grands Classiques De La Littérature Anglaise Et
Américaine. Paris: Hachette, 1992-1994. Print.
GATES Jr., Henry Louis and Nellie Y. McKay (eds.) The Norton Anthology of African
American Literature. New York: Norton& Co., 1997. ( Wilson’s Fences, pp. 2411-2462)
ALMALLAM 7
CERF, Bennett (ed.) Four Contemporary American Plays. New York: Vintage Books, 1961.
(Hansberry’s A Raisin in the Sun, pp.101-205)
Letwin, David, Joe Stockdale, and Robin Stockdale. The Architecture of Drama: Plot,
Character, Theme, Genre, and Style. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow, 2008. Print.
Lethbridge, Stefanie, and Jarmila Mildorf. Basics of English Studies: An introductory course
for students of literary studies in English. Developed at the English departments of the
Universities of Tübingen, Stuttgart and Freiburg. n.d.