Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Critical Essay
Have you ever had a supervisor or a boss that made you feel you wanted to go to work
every day? Or maybe the opposite, in which you dread waking up because you know the
supervisor or boss will be there. That is the feeling of at least 52.3%—who are unhappy at work
according to Forbes magazine (Adams, 2014). The Participatory Leadership model can help.
This model will produce employees that are more engaged in the institution instead of mere
spectators. According to the Participatory Leadership Model, this statistic could go down if
organizational leaders apply this theory, but it also provides insight on what not to do to create
employees that are more engaged. By being careful in avoiding these three factors proposed by
the Participatory Leadership Model: strong ego, fear culture, and lack of vision it is my belief
Firstly, having an ego when leading can cause employees not to offer their opinions, tend
to adhere to strict rules and never question themselves. When a supervisor has a big ego,
employees tend to fear to provide opinions because the boss is never wrong, and fear being
ridiculed in front of their peers. According to Harry Levinson (as cited by Estrof, 2016), It's a
demonstration of power.” A supervisor or boss that has an unchecked ego also tend to adhere to
strict rules and wants everything to go by the book without any mistakes made. And, they tend to
never question themselves they never make mistakes. I used to work in a small private
supervisor that I used to work for had many excellent characteristics but also these three major
flaws. On a regular day, he would provide one set of instructions but the next he would change
them. When an employee tried to understand the change of instructions he would scream at them
PARTICIPATORY LEADERSHIP AND THREE FACTORS TO AVOID 3
stating he never gave the past order. This cause everyone to simply reserve to themselves any
opinion they had, even if they thought they were right and the instructions would cause chaos in
the institution. With this example, we can see that a big ego in a leader can be very harmful to the
organization.
Secondly, a leader that creates a fear culture in the workplace will promote no
recognition, no mistakes are allowed and a rise in employee loss. According to Guijarro (2014),
the presence of a fear culture will encourage employees not to be recognized for the work done
in the institution and when a mistake is made it will not be tolerated. Also, according to Namie
(2003) Employee recruitment and retention are made more difficult when the employer's
reputation suffers from the antics of one or more petty tyrants. Returning to the supervisor I had,
he would not allow any activity that would be to recognize an achievement of an employee,
stating that it will make another feel bad. Adding to this, he would publicly point out mistakes
done by colleagues to “inform” other what not to do. Only in that year, we had three assistants
that left the institution because of this. Taking into consideration these experts opinions and the
personal accounts expressed, we can emphatically state that this conduct of fear culture will only
increase employee loss, employees are not recognized, and mistakes are not allowed.
Lastly, a lack of vision mixed with short term reasoning and immediate result focused
will cause the employees to produce less in their workplace. A leader or supervisor in a work
area needs to follow the vision established by the company or institution. As Blanchard, K., &
Stoner, J. (n.d.) mention there are three critical factors for a successful company and one is
having a clear vision and direction championed by top management. If there is no vision from
the leaders, the institution will only fail. Adding to the mixture that there is no long-term goal,
PARTICIPATORY LEADERSHIP AND THREE FACTORS TO AVOID 4
we can expect that there might be some success, but in the long run, there will be no price. As a
result, employees will not see the company succeed and begin losing faith in the institution and
will not give their best. Returning to the supervisor story, as mentioned earlier, he would change
instructions almost daily. No one would ever correct him or reason with him because it would
only get him mad. When asked in meeting for a marketing strategy, he would only allow those
strategies that provided an immediate result, and since this would not happen often, he would say
that the reason the institution was not progressing was due to the lack of good strategic
marketing.
leadership model only if these three factors are avoided. Understanding that the high percentage
of dissatisfaction among employees with their current employment can be lowered by just
avoiding these factors can do great things for an institution and its employees. As evidenced in
this essay a strong ego, a fear culture, and lack of vision in the workplace will only create
employees that are not satisfied with their employment and companies will suffer the
consequences.
PARTICIPATORY LEADERSHIP AND THREE FACTORS TO AVOID 5
References
Adams, S. (2014, June 20). Most Americans Are Unhappy At Work. Retrieved March 31, 2017,
from https://www.forbes.com/sites/susanadams/2014/06/20/most-americans-are-
unhappy-at-work/#432ca004341a
Blanchard, K., & Stoner, J. (n.d.). The Vision Thing: Without It You'll Never Be a World-Class
Organization. Leader to Leader Institute and Jossey-Bass. Retrieved March 31, 2017,
from http://www.cityvision.edu/courses/coursefiles/304/thevisionthing.pdf
Guijarro Del Cura, F. (2014). Desarrollo de liderazgo. Capital Humano, 27(286), 92-95.
Marrano, H. E. (2016, June 9). When the Boss Is a Bully. Retrieved March 31, 2017, from
https://www.psychologytoday.com/articles/199509/when-the-boss-is-bully
http://www.workplacebullying.org/multi/pdf/N-N-2005.pdf