Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
By: Supervisor:
Nishant Kumar Dr. Vinod Narayanan
B.Tech IV Department of Mechanical
Mechanical Engineering Engineering
S.V. National Institute of Indian Institute of Technology,
Technology, Surat Gandhinagar
May-July, 2010
Analysis of PSE for Perturbed Flows
Abstract
The parabolized stability equations (PSE) are a new approach to analyse the streamwise
evolution of single or interacting Fourier modes in weakly nonparallel flows such as boundary
layers. The concept rests on the decomposition of every mode into a slowly varying amplitude
function and a wave function with slowly varying wave number. The neglect of the small
second derivatives of the slowly varying functions with respect to the streamwise variable
leads to an initial boundary-value problem that is solved by numerical marching procedures.
The PSE approach is valid in convectively unstable flows. The PSE codes have developed
into a convenient tool to analyse basic mechanisms in boundary-layer flow. In this report, the
emphasis has been laid on the analysis of PSE concept in natural variables, along with the
underlying background and concepts. The implementation of the equations using FORTRAN
codes was done to analyse the solutions of the equations.
1 Background
The theoretical background required for understanding the concept of hydrodynamic stability and
analysis of fluid flows is presented here.
The work deals basically with the axisymmetric flows and hence it is beneficial to represent
eqn. (1) in cylindrical coordinates systems in nondimensional form. A change in variables of the
cartesian form of the equation will yield the desired form in cylindrical coordinates r, θ, z
1 ∂2u ∂2u
∂u ∂u w ∂u ∂u ∂p 1 1 ∂ ∂u
+v + +u =− + r + 2 2 + 2 (2)
∂t ∂r r ∂θ ∂u ∂z Re r ∂r ∂r r ∂θ ∂z
∂v w2 1 ∂2v ∂2v
∂v ∂v w ∂v ∂p 1 1 ∂ ∂v v 2 ∂w
+v + +u − = + r + 2 2 + 2− 2− 2 (3)
∂t ∂r r ∂θ ∂z 2 ∂r Re r ∂r ∂r r ∂θ ∂z r r ∂θ
1 ∂2w ∂2w
∂w ∂w w ∂w ∂w v.w 1 ∂p 1 1 ∂ ∂w 2 ∂v w
+v + +u + =− + r + 2 2 + + −
∂t ∂r r ∂θ ∂z r r ∂θ Re r ∂r ∂r r ∂θ ∂z 2 r2 ∂θ r2
(4)
where u, v, w represent the velocity components in z, r, θ directions respectively. We have used the
following vector transformations for the derivations
dr̂ dθ̂
= θ̂ and = −r̂ (5)
dθ dθ
1
Analysis of PSE for Perturbed Flows
The OSE is an eigenvalue equation describing the linear two-dimensional modes of disturbance
to a viscous parallel flow. The perturbed velocity field is
In non-dimensional form, OSE can be obtained from the linearised version of NSE. The final form
of OSE can be represented as
1
(U − c)(φ00 − α2 φ) = − φ0000 − 2α2 φ00 + α4 φ
(8)
αRe
Solution of OSE : For the OSE to give non-trivial solution, we must have
It is assumed that the disturbances are temporally growing. Thus, depending on the value of c,
the α − Re plane can be divided into following domains
• c < 0, flow is stable (i.e., disturbances decay),
• c = 0, flow is neutrally stable, and
• c > 0, flow is unstable (i.e., disturbances grow).
Squire’s Theorem: To each unstable three dimensional disturbance there corresponds a more
unstable two-dimensional one.
∂u ∂u 1 ∂2u
u +v = (10)
∂x ∂y Re ∂x2
∂u ∂v
+ =0 (11)
∂x ∂y
For similarity solution of the above equations, we consider
u
= f 0 (η) (12)
U
where
r
y U
η= =y (13)
δ(x) νx
Blasius profile: This equation is used to analyse flow over a flat plate at zero angle of attack. We
convert the NSE which is a PDE into an ODE which can be solved easily using numerical methods.
1
f 000 + f f 00 = 0, (14)
2
f (0) = f 0 (0) = 0, f (∞) = 1 (15)
2
Analysis of PSE for Perturbed Flows
Falkner-Skan equation: Here, we generalize the Blasius boundary layer by considering a wedge at
an angle of attack β from some uniform velocity field
x m
ue (x) = U0 (16)
L
Thus,
f 000 + f f 00 + β 1 − f 02 = 0
(17)
where,
2m
β= (18)
m+1
uz = ū = U + u, ur = v̄ = V + v, uθ = w̄ = W + w, p̄ = P + p (19)
W = 0 and U, V 6= f (θ)
The disturbances are also assumed to be parallel flows. Then the most general form for the 1-D
disturbance q is that of a travelling wave whose amplitude varies with r and which moves along
the boundary at an angle θ with respect to the z axis. In complex notation, the disturbances may
be represented as
All disturbances have wave number α and frequency β. They are referred to as Tollmein-Schlichting
waves which are indications of laminar-flow instability.
The basic flow satisfies the momentum equation. In vector form, the momentum equation may
be represented as
DV~
~ .∇)
+ (V ~ V~ = − 1 ∇P
~ + ν.∇ ~ 2V
~ (21)
Dt ρ
By suitable transformations, the N-S equations in non-dimensional form for the basic flow can
be written in the cylindrical coordinate system for r,θ,z directions.
r momentum:
∂V ~ .∇)V
~ 1 ∂P 1 ~ 2 V − V − 2 ∂W
+ (V − W2 = − + ∇ (22)
∂t r ∂r Re r2 r2 ∂θ
θ momentum:
∂W ~ .∇)W
~ V.W 1 ∂P 1 ~ 2 W − W + 2 ∂V
+ (V + =− + ∇ (23)
∂t r r ∂θ Re r2 r2 ∂θ
3
Analysis of PSE for Perturbed Flows
z momentum:
∂U ~ .∇)U
~ ∂P 1 ~2
+ (V =− + ∇ U (24)
∂t ∂z Re
Now, we substitute the perturbed velocity components given by eqn. (19) into the N-S equation
and subtract out the basic flow V~ and P equalities, as given by eqs. (22-24), and neglect higher
powers and product of p. The linearized disturbance equations may then be written as
2
1 ∂2u ∂2u
∂u ∂U ∂u ∂u ∂U ∂P 1 ∂ u 1 ∂u
+u +U +V +v =− + + + + (25)
∂t ∂z ∂z ∂r ∂r ∂z Re ∂r2 r ∂r r2 ∂θ2 ∂z 2
2
1 ∂2v ∂2u
∂u ∂V ∂v ∂v ∂V ∂P 1 ∂ v 1 ∂v v 2 ∂w
+u +U +V +v =− + + + + − −
∂t ∂z ∂z ∂r ∂r ∂r Re ∂r2 r ∂r r2 ∂θ2 ∂z 2 r2 r2 ∂θ
(26)
2 2 2
∂w ∂w ∂w 1 1 ∂P 1 ∂ w 1 ∂w 1 ∂ w ∂ w w 2 ∂v
+U +V + V.w = − + + + 2 2 + − 2+ 2
∂t ∂z ∂r r r ∂θ Re ∂z 2 r ∂r r ∂θ ∂z 2 r r ∂θ
(27)
To eliminate the pressure terms appearing in the eqs. (25-27), at first, we subtract the r-
derivative of eqn. (25) from the z-derivative of eqn. (26)
4
Analysis of PSE for Perturbed Flows
A11 A12 v B11 B12 v
=β (30)
A21 A22 w B21 B22 w
∂
The values of the elements of the matrix are given as here D→ ∂r
i ∂2U
1 ∂U 2 1 D 1 ∂U 1 2 1 D
A11 = − D − 2+ + D+ − D+ −U D − 2 +
α ∂z r r α ∂r∂z r ∂r r r r
2 2
i ∂V 1 D i 2 2 D ∂V ∂ U ∂U
+ D2 − 2 + + V D3 + 3 − 2 D + + D+ − iα
α ∂r r r α r r r ∂r ∂r2 ∂z
2
∂V 1 ∂ V 1 1 ∂V 1 D ∂V
+ U α2 + D+ − D+ − D2 − 2 + − iαV D − iα
∂z r ∂z 2 r α ∂z r r ∂r
2 2 2
∂ V iα 1 D 2n i 1 n i 1 D
− + D2 − 2 + − 3
D+ + 2
D2 − 2 +
∂z∂r Re r r Re.r α r Re.r α r r
2 3 2
1 i 6 6D 3D D 1 i 2 2 D
− D4 − 4 + 3 − 2 + − D3 + 3 − 2 D +
Re α r r r r Re.r α r r r
2
1 i 1 D 1 iα iαn 1 iα
+ 2
D2 − 2 + + iαD2 + D− 2
− iα3 −
Re.r α r r Re Re.r Re.r Re Re.r2
i ∂ 2 U in
1 ∂U in in ∂U in in in
A12 = − 2 − 2 + D + − −U − 2 + D
α ∂z r r α ∂r∂z r ∂r r r r
∂ 2 V in
i ∂V in in i 2in 2in in 2 ∂V in
+ − 2 + D + V − 2 + D + −
α ∂r r r α r3 r r ∂z r ∂z 2 r
2
1 ∂V in in iα in in in 2 in
− − 2 + D + − 2 + D −
α ∂z r r Re r r α Re.r3 r
in2 1
in in i 6in 6in 3in 2 in 3
+ − + D − − + D − D + D
α Re.r2 r2 r α r4 r3 r2 r
1 i 2in 2in in 2 1 i in in 2iα in
− − + D + − + D −
Re.r α r3 r2 r Re.r2 α r2 r r r
β 2 1 D
B11 = D − 2+ − αβ
α r r
β in in
B12 = − 2 + D
α r r
i ∂2U
n 1 1 1 ∂U 1 in 1
A21 = − D+ + D+ − D+ − U D+
r∗α r rα ∂θ∂z r r ∂θ r r r
2
1 ∂V 1 D Vn 1 D in ∂U 1 ∂ U
+ D2 − 2 + − D2 − 2 + + +
rα ∂θ r r rα r r r ∂r r ∂θ∂r
3
D2
nα 1 n 1 n 3 2 2
− D+ − D+ − D + 3 − 2D +
Re.r r Re.r3 α r Re.rα r r r
n 1 D 2αn
− D2 − 2 + −
Re.r2 α r r Re.r2
5
Analysis of PSE for Perturbed Flows
i ∂ 2 U in U n2
n ∂U in 1 ∂U in i ∂V in in
A22 = − + − + 2 + − 2 + D
rα ∂z r rα ∂θ∂z r r ∂θ r r rα ∂θ r r
Vn in in ∂U ∂V V 1 ∂V nα in
− − 2 + D − iα + U α2 − D − iαV D − iα − −
rα r r ∂z ∂z r r ∂z Re.r r
n3
in n 2in 2in in 2 n in in
− + − + D + − + D
Re.r3 α r Re.rα r3 r2 r Re.r2 α r2 r
2 3
iα 2 iα iαn iα iα
+ D + D− − −
Re Re.r Re.r2 Re Re.r2
iβn 1
B21 = D+
αr r
iβn 1n
B22 = − αβ
αr r
The eqn. (30) has three parameters: α,c and ν. For a given profile, only a certain continuous but
limited sequence of these parameters the eigenvalues will satisfy the relation. The mathematical
problem is to find this sequence, which has a different functional form for spatial versus temporal
growth of disturbances.
A FORTRAN program that takes the velocity profile as input and evaluates the corresponding
eigenvalues from the relation given by eqn. (30) was used to analyse the flow for stability.
3.2 Introduction
The PSEs are used to analyze the streamwise evolution of Fourier modes in weakly non-parallel
flows. It relies on the decomposition of each mode into a slowly varying amplitude function and
a wave function with slowly varying wave number. Analogous to the OSE, a BiGlobal stability
analysis generalises the flow assumptions in 2D plane. This concept is inadequate in prediction of
breakdown as it neglects the axial gradients that may influence the vortex. This necessitates an
analysis technique that can account for velocity and pressure gradients. Thus, the 3D-PSE concept
originated which has an advantage of being able to solve for arbitrarily complicated basic states
in the x, y plane.
6
Analysis of PSE for Perturbed Flows
∇~v = 0 (31)
∂~v 1
+ (~v .∇)~v = − ∇p + ν∇2~v (32)
∂t ρ
In Cartesian coordinates (x, y, z) we use velocity components v̂ = (û, v̂, ŵ) and
∂ ∂ ∂
∇= î + ĵ + k̂ (33)
∂x ∂y ∂z
We consider the stability of 2D steady laminar boundary-layer flows neglecting the mean flow
and derivatives in the spanwise z direction. For stability analysis, we decompose the total flow
field v̂, p̂ into the steady laminar basic flow V, P and the disturbance v, p.
v̂ = V + v, p̂ = P + p (34)
−1
We introduce a term ε such that ξ = x, where is of order O(Re ). This accounts for the slow
variation of variables with respect to the streamwise direction. Owing to uniformity in z, the steady
basic flow takes the form V = [U (ξ, y), V (ξ, y), 0]. Here, Reynolds number is Rex = Uνr x with a
proper reference velocity Ur . Under boundary-layer approximation, the basic flow is governed by
Ux + Vy = 0 (35)
1
U Ux + V Uy = −Px + Uyy (36)
Re
0 = −Py (37)
1
U Wx + V W y = Wyy (38)
Re
For disturbances v, p we obtain the stability equations
ux + vy + wz = 0 (39)
1
vt + U ux + uUx + V uy + vUy + W uz + px − (uxx + uyy + uzz ) = − (uux + vuy + wuz ) (40)
Re
1
vt + U vx + V vy + vVy + W vx + py − (vxx + vyy + vzz ) = − (uvx + vvy + wvz ) (41)
Re
1
wt + U wx + uWx + V wy + vWy + W wz + pz − (wxx + wyy + wzz ) = − (uwx + vWy + wwz )
Re
(42)
where we have neglected the small term u0 Vx in the y-equation. For a given basic flow, this system
is equivalent to the Navier-Stokes equations and hence of elliptic type.
For the instability study, we apply the following homogeneous boundary conditions
u = 0, v = 0, w = 0 at u = 0 (43)
u −→ 0, v −→ 0, w −→ 0 as y −→ ∞ (44)
as the inhomogeneous conditions are satisfied by the basic flow. In non-linear problems, however,
the fluctuating components of the disturbance also create a distortion of the steady mean flow
7
Analysis of PSE for Perturbed Flows
(ū, v̄, w̄). Since the mean flow and its distortion are governed by the boundary-layer equations, we
must admit v̄ 6= 0 as y −→ ∞ with
vy −→ 0 as y −→ ∞ (45)
and p̄x = 0. In general, the nonlinear stability equations can be solved under inhomogeneous
boundary conditions to account for disturbances at the wall or in the free stream.
We note that
and by substituting the components of eqns. (46 − 47) into the linearized eqns. (39 − 42), we
obtain in nondimensional form (Henceforth, the 0 from the amplitude function is dropped and 0
terms will represent the disturbances)
∂u ∂v dα dα
L1 u + L2 v + M1 + M2 + N1 u + N2 v = 0 (50)
∂x ∂x dx dx
where the operators L, M and N act only in y and are given as follows
8
Analysis of PSE for Perturbed Flows
3α2 1 2
M2 = iΩ − Ux − 2iαU − V D − Vy − iβW − + D
Re Re
β2 2αβ iUy iU 2 2α 2
− + iβU + − D− D − D
Re Re β β βRe
i Uy 3iα U
N1 = − D + − D+ D
Re β βRe β
3α β 1
N2 = iU − − − D2
Re Re βRe
9
Analysis of PSE for Perturbed Flows
Equation (50) along with one of the conditions (56) and (57), or any suitable norm are the
closed system of parabolized stability eqquations (PSE). This system permits the simultaneous
calculation of α(x) and q(x, y) in a streamwise marching procedure. Different norms lead to
different partitions (46) of the solution q0 . The physical solution q0 , however, is the same to within
small effects of the norm on the PSE approximation.
10
Analysis of PSE for Perturbed Flows
Conclusion
The parabolized stability equations have developed into a mature approach to analyse the receptiv-
ity, linear, and nonlinear stability of convectively unstable flows into the late stages of transition.
The applications of the PSE approach for transition analysis in aerodynamic flows aim towards
disturbance environment and location of the transition point based on the nonlinear changes in
skin friction. The methods discussed here in the report will be useful in better documentation of
the disturbance environment.
References
[1] Michael S. Broadhurst and Spencer J. Sherwin. The parabolised stability equations for 3d-
flows: Implementation and numerical stability. Applied Numerical Mathematics, 58:10171029,
2008.
[2] Thorwald Herbert. Parabolized stability equations. Special Course on Progress in Transition
Modelling, AGARD REPORT 793:4/1–34, 1994.
[3] Thorwald Herbert. Parabolized stability equations. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 29:245–
283, 1997.
[4] Fei Li and Mujeeb R. Malik. Spectral analysis of parabolized stability equations. Computers
& Fluids, Vol. 26:pp. 279–297, 1997.
[5] S.S. Motsa and P. Sibanda. On the chebyshev spectral collocation method in channel and jet
flows. Journal of Pure Applied Mathematics, 1(1):36–47, 2001.
[6] Helen L. Reed. Parabolized stability equations: 2-d flows. NATO, RTO-EN-AVT-151:4/1–26.
[7] Vassilios Theofilis. Advances in global linear instability analysis of nonparallel and three-
dimensional flows. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 39:249315, 2003.
11