CLIENT:

tN

t
r
I
t
t
I
I

SUGA
EOL'SE
BLOCK
voBrLE:it1-'zl_iiziiz*,rrruryAl\rpARA,DlrAru.
 Table Of Contents

SL. Description Page No.

No.
1.0 lntroduction 0i
2.0 Methodology 01
3.0 Location 01
4.0 Scope of work 01
5.0 Field work. 02
6.0 Laboratory Test. 02
7.0 Geological Set-Up & Soil Composition 05
8.0 Correlation Table of Soil Based on SPT 05
9.0 Evaluation of Bearing Capacity. 06
10.0 Formula Use for Computation 10
I 1.0 Recommendation 11

ATTACHMENT

A. SITE PLAN
B. BORING LOG
C. GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS TEST.
D. LTNCONFINED COMPRESSION TESTS
E. CONSOLIDATION TEST
F. DIRECT SHEAR TESTS
G. TEST RESULTS SUMMARY STMET.
 I
t 1.0 INTRODUCTION:

I A reasonably accurate conceptioD about the subsoil parameters of any project site is an essential
priority for proper planning and designing the foundation of the concemed structue, So that the
structue after its construction word remain safe and stable although out it's service period.

I Paying due considerations to those for Client: Md. Rezaul Karim Gong was agreed to offer
the sub-surface investigation work of the same in favor of Sugandha Soil Investigator, a well
reputed geotechnical firm in Dhaka, Bangladesh

I According to work order of representative of the clien! a detailed sub-soil study was comprising
execution of 4 (Four) number borings 61ft to 81ft deep, including the different field and

t laboratory tests, report submission etc had been undedaken and carried out by Sugandha SoiI
Investigator are responsible fot soil tests but the Reporter / Engineer is rcsponsible only for
Report, during the period of October - 2017

T
t 2.0 METHODOLOGY:
Sugandha Soil Investigator sent one SPT Test team for fleld test at tlrc site. According to work
order, Team Leader of SPT Test team contracted with representative of client for recognizing the
selected land and locations for field test. After complete the field test, Team Leader collected the

I signatue on Bore Logs sheet fiom the representative of client.

t 3.0 CLIENT:
Md. Rezaul Karim Gong

4.0 LOCATION:
The soil investigation works for construction of Proposed 8 (Eight) Storied Residential Building,
At Dag No. 218, Khatian No. 60, J.L. No. 56, Mouza - Dewla, Thana - Tangail Sadar, Dist'
Tangail, Bangladesh

SCOPE OF WORK:
The main scopes of this investigation work are:
a. Execution of exploratory borings, recordiag of sub-soil stratification and position of ground
water table.
b. Execution of standard penetration test (SPT) at an interval of 5ft depth with collection of
disturbed soil samples up to frnal depth exploration of each borings.

I c. Collection of undisturbed soil samples by thin walled Shelby tubes for each bore hole.
d. Preparation of fine report with all works including detailed description of soil stratification
sutf-soil.

I e. From the filed tests and laboratory tests, scope of calculation for bearing capaclty values for
flesip shallow foundation.
f. For loose and soft strata, from the filed test and laboratory tests, scope calculation for skin

I friction and bearing values for design deep foundation.

I
I
T
:l
Fl
r 6.0 FIELD WORKS:
All the filed works and filed tests were conducted as per standard procedure as laid down in
follows:

I
ASTM specifrcation are as

6.1 Exploratory Boring drilling:

t Drilling was executed by wash boring method. A hole was started by driving vertically a
4 diameter steel casing into ilre grourd to some depth and then the formation ground casing was
broken up by repeated drops of a chopping bit attached to the lower and of drilling pipe. The

t upper end of the same was forced at high pressure through pressure pipe. Forced slurry or water
emerges at high velocity through the pores of the chopping bit, and retums to the surface through
the annular space between drilling pipe and the side of the casing or hole, carrying with it the

t broken-up soil. In this way clrilling is advanced up to a level of 6" above the depth, where SPT
has to be executed.

I 6.2 Standard Penetration Test:

Standard penetration Tests have been executed in all the bore holes at 5ft. intervals of depth up to
the final depth of boring. In this test, a split spoon sampler of 2" out diameter and l-3i8" imer

I diarneter, is made to penetrate 18 inches, into the soil by drops of a hammer weighing 140 lbs'
failing freely for a height of 30 inches. Number of blows of hammer required for penetration of
each 6 inch length of the sampler are recorded. The number of blows for the last 12 inch

t penetration of the total 18 inch is know as the standard penetration value (N-values) as specified
by ASTM and is plotted the SPT value ofthe particular depth.

t 6.3 Extraction of soil samples:

Disnrbed soil samples were collected at 5'-0" intervals and at every change of soil strata by
split spoon sampler. These soil samples were studied visually and the soil classification were

I done to prepare strata chart of soils up to the explored depth. Before collection of samples, the
hole is washed and cleaned the drill pipe with the help of an adapter and is lowered into the hole.
The sampler is then pressed down into the ground in one rapid continuous movement until the

I tube, except 4 inches from the top is filled with soil sample. Undisturbed soil samples are taken
at a depth where layer of soil is chaaged such as 8 ft 12 ft. Undisturbed soil samples are collected

r by means of thin walled sharp ended 3 inch dia. Shelby tube from the cohesive soil formation.
The collect tubes were then labeled with detailed job desigration, date and shifted to the
laboratory for testing.

I '
7,0
All
LABORATORY TESTS:
Laboratory Tests conducted on soil samples collected either in the disturbed or in the
undisturbed state. AIl tests were done as per ASTM procedures, are as follow:

I J.1 Natural Moisture content:

The water content of a soil sample is the ratio of the weight of the water in the sample to its dry

I ., weight. It is usually expressed as a percentage. The soil sample is weight both in natual state
'and
in over dry state and the moisture content is calculated by dividing the Ioose of weight of the
sample by its dry weight.

I
I
T
7.2 Complete Grain Size AnalYsis:
The objeit of grain size analysis is to determine the size of the soil grains, and the percentage by
weighiof soil particles of different particles size, comprising a soil sample. The prgcesl consists
of elther sieve analysis or h1'drometer analysis or both. The hydrometer analysis is adopted for
sample passing sieve No. 200.

For hydrometer analysis. a ,{0 gas of the over dry sample, is thoroughly mixed with required
quantity of water in a calibrated glass cylinder. In order to avoid flocculation, a little dispersing
agent is added. The densitl' of the suspension is measured at specified time intervals, by means
of a hydrometer or special design. At any particular time the size of the largest particle
remounting in suspension at the level of the hydrometer can be computed by means of stocks
Law, wheri as he weight of the particles frnet than that size, can be computed ftom the density of
the suspension at the same level. The mixture is washed through U.S standard sieve No- 200 and
the ftaction retaiaed is &ied. The fraction retained on each sieve is weighed for calculation ofthe
Wrcentage of different fraction. The results are represented
by cumulative curves plotted on
semi Jogarithmi c grap h pape r.

7.3 Atterberg Iimi15;

physical proftnies of cla-r- are greatly influenced by waler content. A given soil behave as a fluid
or a soil or, as a plastic materials, depending on how mueh water its contains'
The water .ooteo15 that correspond to the boundaries between the states of consistency are called
just starts
as the Atrerberg 1imir. Liquid Limit is the minimum water content at which a clay soil
behaving tiXe a-nuia. h is determined with the help of a standard limit device which consists of
brass cr-tp and an anangement to impart blows to cap at a uniform rate. The water content at
which 25 blows are required is terrned as the limit. The plastic limit is the minimum water
content ar *hich a soi.l ii jus plasic and is determined by rotling out a soil sample at a slowly
decreasing warer content until, the desired water content is reached, at which a thread of 1/8 inch
diameter just begging lo crumble. The thread is rolled on glass plate with hard'

7.4 Specific Gravitv Test:

The specific graritl: of soil particles (Gs) is defined as the ratio of the mass of give volume of
roit p'u.ti"t"r io the mass of an equal volume of water at 40C. The specific grav-ity of a solid for
mosi natural soils falls i,n general range of 2.60 to 2.80. To determine the specific gravity of soil
sample,25 grams of or-er dried soil sample is

thoroughly pulverized and is placed in a calibrated psychomotor. Water is poured incise the
pycno'rnetir urtil ir's top is slightly below the calibrated mark. The mixture is then boiled
lthoroughly in ordg116 sliminate all the air bubbles. More water is
tt en uiaei to the mixture ritl it over-night, the temperature is then recorded and the bottle is
wpighed.
The specifrc graviq G' is given b1':
: Gt. Ws
'
-Gs
Ws -W1+ w2
Where, Gt = Specific gravit-r' of water at TOC'
Ws = The *eight of over dry soil (25gns.)
Wr = Weight of flask + soil + water.
' Wz = Weight of flask + water.
3
 7.5 Direct shear Test:
Of""t.tr"* test can be performed for both cohesion less & cohesive soil to determhe shear
strength, angle of interni friction. cohesion c, volume change etc. The test is .done
in a direct
sheJ machline which consisrs of a normal loading device, shearing displacement of
approximately l0mm per minute is often for a sample used for a sample thickness
of about
t.icm. The results of a direct shear test on a cohesion less & cohesive soil can be presented in a
summary table & bY stress-strail

displacement for both

curve. A stress-strain cun-e normaJly consists of shear stress, various shear
load usually
the undisturbed and the remolded iest under a specified normal load the normal
stress will
;;;; lTtklcml to lkg cm2. Another curve of normal stress verses shearing
give angle of internal arrd cohesion for cohesive soil'

7.6 Unconfined ComPression Test:

strength of
Unconfined .o,,pr.siion rest is a simple method for determination of shearing
cohesive soil whiih is important to determine the bearing capacity of soil.
As the name implies,
kePt zero, unsuPPorted
undisturbed soil samPle
m dia. The sPecimen is

;'H":T,ffillT*ilH,J"*:?'ffi i]lTi
gauge, fitted
the specimen $irh rhe help of double providing ring assembly frtted with a strain
*i fr,f-r. apparatus. The load is applied at such a rate that the vertical deformation of the sample
jgo and drainage during compression. The
-t.p, tnro p€rcenr) p.. ,rriorrt" in order to avoid shearing
is nearll,
plane. The maximum load at
iouJ lr increasing unril rhe specimen fails along
of the
failure kno$s as the unconfned compressive strength of the sample the shearing strength
sample is half of the Lrnconfi-ned compressive strenglh'

7.7 Consolidation Test:

rtre gaard process of compression of soil under the action of static load and with decrease
of
void ratio due to expulsion of water fiom the so
compressibiliq charactenstics of a soil as the
depends on these characteristics. The test
6.35cm dia and 2.5'1cm thickness, The spec
carefully trimming it
specimen is then pla
, with that of the rirg
the specimen. The load is then applied on po
i*iu."*g"."nt *-ith the apparatus. Decieases in volume of specimen are read from a strain
gauge attached to the consolidation tmit at
always kept full with water i-n order to avoid
' , allowed after each twenty four house, the obs
graph paper to give the pressure'void ratio cr
IAi"fut"i. C6 is-importanjt factor goveming the settlement process of underlying soils.

II
4

l.
 I
I SOI
I
8.0 GEOLOGICAL SET-UP & COMPOSITION:
8.1 Regional Geologr:

Geologically, the project area is located in central edge of Dhaka Terrace. The Terrace is a part
of Modhupur Inlier. An elevated landmass surrounded by the flood plain of the rivers.
; Ganges, Bratrmaputra and Buriganga. the elevation ofthe Dhaka.

I Terrace is about 8m from the MSL. The Terrace is bounded by umber of faults. The Terrace
informed of elevated dome shaped low hillocks and dish shaped depressions results due to

I erosion. The depressions are interconnected by depression ofthe Terrace.

Tectonically site is located in the deeper part of Bengal Basin. No. surface folding or faulting
could be identified in and around the area.

t The project area is located in Seismic Zane-|l of Seismic Zoning Map of Bangladesh wherte the
basic Seismic Co-efficient may be around 0.05-

t 8.2 DESCRIPTION OF SOIL COMPOSITION:

The following terms are used in this report for description ofsoil composition:

t Trace fine sand : I to l0% fine sand.

Little silt
Some clay
: I 1 to 20% silt.
20 to 35Vo clay.

I Sandy silt
Clayey silt
Silty sand
35 to 50% sand & 50 to 70% silt.
35 to 50% clay & 50 to 70% silt.
35 to 50o/o silt & 50 to 70 Yo safi.

I 9. O CORRDLATION
Two tables for Non -
TABLE OF SOILS BASED ON SPT.VALUES:
Cohesive and cohesive soils based on N- Values as below

I 9.1 values of Unit Weight and Angle of Internal Friction of Non- Cohesive soil Based on N-
Values (After trC Terzaghi and R B. Peck):

I Table No. I

I N-Values Condition Relative Angle of Internal Moist Unit Wt.

r
Density Friction In Pcf.
0-4 Very loose 0.0-0.2 25'-30' 70-i00
4-10 Loose 0.2-0.4 30'-35' 90-115

r
l0-30 Medium 0.4-0.6 35'-40' 110-140
30-50 Dense 0.6-0.85 4ou45u l l0-140
Over 50 Very dense 1.00 45u 130-150

I The tabulated values apply for dryimoist cohesion less sand. for silty sands the bearing capacity
values must be reduced by study of grain size classification and applying judgrrent. Conection
for water table close to bottom of foundation the bearing values should be reduced to half. The

I bearing values are, however, not affected by the water table at a depth greater than 1.5B below
foundation level, B being least dimension of the bottom of foundation. Bearings values for
interrnediate position of water table may be reduced by liner interpolation.

I
I
 9.2 Values of approrimate unconfined compressive strength Based on N-Values f,'or
Cohesive Soil (After IC Teuashi end R-B. Peck):
Table No.- 2

N-Values Condition Unconfined compressive Strength

in Tsf.
Below 2 Very soft Below 0.25
2-4 Soft 0.25-0.s0
4-8 Medium 0.50-1.00
8-15 stiff t.00-2.00
l5-30 Very stiff 2.00-4.00
Over Hard Over 4.00

In the above table the shear strength of cohesive soil is equal to l/2 of unconfined compressive
strength and the angle of shearins resistance is equal to zero. It should be remembered that the
correlation for cohesive soii is ahra] s much reliable'

1O.OPHYSICAL PROPERTIES:
Physical Properties of the subsoil tbrmation of the project area have been evaluated by the
execution ofi (Four) number borirgs 61ft to 81ft deep. The overall physical properties may be
summarized as follows:

10.1 Stratification of soil:

The top soil at and around each of bonng bears to gray medium silty clay, trace fine sand, gray
medium fine sand, some to little silt and the bottom soil is white gray medium dense to dense
medium to fine sand, some silt, trace mica* 1Ref. Bore logs).

I 0.2 Consistenry/ComPacfness:
Up to the depth- of SCi to Sft, consistencl of the top soil usually medium/stiff to very stiff
consistercy oi soil, however, gfadually increase the consistency The subsequent deep layers stiff
to very stiff soil state.

10.3 Ground Water Table:

The position of Ground water table (GwT) is about 7ft ro 7.5ft from existing $ound.
10.4 Natural moisture content, Unit Weight, Specific Gravity and Limits:

I of Variation in Laboratorl Test Results:

I Name bf the Soil Test No. of Tests Ra:rge of Variation

-Natural
Moisture content 8 From 22,86 to i5.
Natural unit Weisht 0 From 0.00 pcfto 0.00

I Dry density
Specific $avity
0 From 0.00 pcf to 0.00
From 2.67 to 2.68'7

r Liquid Limite,
citv index
Grain Size
8

6
From NP %o to 55o/o
From NPTo to 3 1%, NP= Non Plastic
From curve

I
I
t
rr 11.0ENGII\IEERING PROPERTIES:
The engineering properties of soil, including the cohesion, compressibility and the angle of

t intemal granular friction have been determined by performing laboratory tests on the soil
samples collected during filed investigation. These are as follows:

of

I
11.1 Cohesion: The values of cohesion, as reported from the performance unconfined
compression (2Nos.) tests varies from 0.00 Psi to 0.00 Psi.

11.2 Compressibility: The top layer of plastic silty soil usually has been observed moderately

E compressible in nature by consolidation tests (2Nos.), as the values of compression index, varies
from 0.00 to 0.00 and the corresponding values ofthe initial void ratio, 0.00 to 0'00.

I 11.3 Angle of Internal Friction:

The angle of intemal fiiction values ofthe investigated of soil, as reported form the performance

I of direct shear test (4Nos.) varies form 310 to 330.

rIl 12. O EVALUATION OF BEARING CAPACITY:

12.1 Bearing Capacities of the Shallow Condition from the SPT:

ofthe shallow foundation (values in Tst F.

Allowable Bearine capacity in Tsf.
S. :3

r 0.225 -0.45

I Note: a. Width: 4ft for strip footing and width : 8ft for isolated footing resp,ectively.

I b. The above values are the net allowable Bearing capacities.

r c. The cohesive soil has been considered in a saturated condition.

12.2 Bearing of the shallow foundations from the parameters.

r The bearing capacity ofthe shallow foundation may more appropriately be determhed ftom the
pmameters ofsoil such as the value of cohesion and the angle of intemal friction as obtained from
the, performs of laboratory test. These have been done considering the general equation of the

I bearing capacity of the foundation as suggested by Terzaghi. The evaluated values are
provided in the following Table No. 5 and Table No. 6.

I
I
Il
r
t
-a
TABLE NO. 5: BEARING CAPACITIES OF TIIE SHALLOW FOT]NDATION FROM FIELD
AND LABORATORY TEST (VALUES IN TSF, F. S. = 3.00):

t Bore Depth in Field Cohesion

Tsf
Bearing capacity (Tsfl

t
Hole No. Ft SPT For Strip For Circular or
footine Square footinc
5 2 0.13 0.37 0.47
l0 4 0.25 0.68 0.86

n BH.I 15 7 0.44 0.99 1.3 I

rr
20 9 0.56 1.23 1.61
5 ) 0.31 0.76 1.03
10 7 0.44 0.99 1.31
BH.z 15 9 0.56 1.23 r.61
20 l3 0.8 r 1.74 2.25
) 4 0.25 0.68 0.86

r
10 7 0.-+1 0.99 1 .31
BH-3 15 I 0.50 1.11 1.47
20 10 0.62 1.36 1.61
5 4 0.25 0.68 0.86

t BH.4
10
l5
20
6
7
t2
0.38
0.44
0.75
0.88
0.99
1.61
1.19
l.3l
2.08

I Note: SPT correction depends on overburden pressure, water table. F. S.: 3.00 as Bangladesh

I National Building Code @NBC).

t
Table No. 6 Beering Capacities of The Shallow Foundation From Unconfned Compression
Tests (Values In Tsf, F. S. = 3.00):

t
Bore Depth in Ft Unconfined Allowable bearins caDacity in Tsf
Hole No. Compression Strip footing Square footing
Streneth h Psi

t
BII-I to BH - 4

I
I Di3Ka'1216

t
I
lt
:l
rl
12.3 BEARING CAPACITIES OF PILES FROM TIIE SPT AND SOIL PARAMETERS:
Table No.7: Skin Friction and the End Bearing Capacities of Piles (F. 5.=3.00):

t
BH-1 BH-2
Depth Ft N N' Cu Tsf f,Tsf fi, Tsf N N' Cu Tsf f" Tsf f6Tsf
5 2 2.0 0.13 0.0r 2.0 5 5.0 0.31 0.02 5.0
7.0

I
10 4 4.0 0.25 0.02 4.0 7 7.0 0.44 0.03
15 7 7.0 0.44 0.03 7.0 9 9.0 0.56 0.04 9.0
20 9 9.0 0.56 0.04 9.0 l3 13.0 0.81 0.06 13.0

t 25
30
35
12
5
7
12.0
5.0
7.0
0.06
0.02
0.03
12.0
5.0
7.0
l5
5
6
15.0
5.0
6.0
0.07
0.02
0.03
15.0
5.0
6.0

I 7.0 1 7.0 0.03 7.0

40 7 7.0 0.03
45 9 9.0 0.04 9.0 l0 10.0 0.05 10.0
50 l0 10.0 0.05 10.0 13 13.0 0.06 13.0

I 55
60
1l
16
I1.0
15.5
B1t{-3
0.05
0.07
11.0
15.5
15
18
15.0
16.5
BH 4
0.07
0.08
15.0
16.5

I 5
10
4
7
4.0
7.0
0.25
0.44
0.02
0.03
4.0
7.0
4
6
4.0
6.0
0.25
0.38
0.02
0.03
4.0
6.0

t t5 8 8.0 0.50 0.04 8.0 7 7.0 0.44 0.03 7.0

20 10 10.0 0.62 0.05 10.0 t2 12.0 0.75 0.06 12.0
25 13 13.0 0.06 13.0 15 15.0 0.07 15.0

I
30 4 4.0 0.02 4.0 5 5.0 0.02 5.0
35 7 7.0 0.03 7.0 5 5.0 0.02 5.0
40 6 6.0 0.03 6.0 8 8.0 0.04 8.0

I 45 10 10.0 0.05 10.0 10 10.0 0.05 10.0

50 t2 12.0 0.06 12.0 t2 12.0 0.06 12.0
55 l3 13.0 0.06 13.0 ll 1 1.0 0.05 11.0

I 60
65
70
l0
l4
L7
10.0
14.0
16.0
0.05
0.07
0.08
10.0
14.0
16.0
t8
t6
15
r6.5
15.5
15.0
0.08
0.07
0.07
16.5
15.5
15.0

I 75
80
Note: N = BlowVft, Cu : Cohesion.
22
29
18.5
22.0
0.09
0.11
18.5
22.0

I ' '
a. f. = Allowable value of the skin friction.
b. fu= Allowable value ofthe pilc eud bearing capacily.

I '
c. SPT (N) values are corrected within calculation.
d. The values of f, and fr have been halved in making preliminary estimate about the

t ' , carrying capacity of a Bored R. C. C. pile.

t
e. In the case of plastic silty soil, the values of the cohesion have. been obtained from the
SPT values.

t
r
 I3.O FORMULA USED FOR COMPUTATION:
For Cohesive soil.
The ultimate bearing capacity.

Qult = Clr1": Ouz.lL( J. E. Bowles)

:
qall : qu Nc + yDr: !L,-]le yDF (factor of safety : 3.00)
2.3 6
Where, q, : Unconfined Compressive Strength in tsf.
N. = Bearing Capacity Factor
= 6.8 square footing.
= 5.5 continuous footing.

r For Non-cohesive soil:

Qult = C Nc $s + rD1Nq + 0.5v BNv Sr(J. E. Bowles)
Where, C : Cohesior! y : Unit weight of soil

r D6: Depth of footing, B: Width of footing

N6, Nq & Ny : bearing capacity factorc = f (@) : f(N)
Sc, S, : Shape Factors = f @, D1)

r Qallowable: qult/F. S. (F. S. : 3)

(f) Capacity of pile

r
Illtimate Skin Friction (Fs) And End Bearing
For Cohesive soil:
fs = FCa (M. J. Tomlinson)
Wherc, Cd : qu : Unconfined Compressive strength of soil and

r F= Bearing Capacity Factor (ranges between 0.60 & 45)

r
For Non- Cohesive Soil:
The value of the skin friction as well of the bearing capacity ofthe pile of Non-cohesive soil
may be evaluated on the basis of corrected value of the freld SPT as Suggested by Meyerhoh
according of the following formulae.

t fq=4N' rsf
rs - 4N'/ 200 Tsf

t But in our case, the investigated soil are not purely sand, rather there exhibit some silt,
materials, are modift the above relation of Meyerhof according to Scmertmaun's {1970),
Observation in the following.

I f q=3N' rsr
ls :- 4N'/2oo Tsf

t (Ref Briok: X'oundation Analysis

Edition).
& Design by J.E. Bowles Page No. 525-535 2'd

t l0

I
t
t
I
I
t RECOMMENDATION:

I On the basis of aforesaid conclusion, the following recommendations are suggested for proposed
I (Eigh| Storied Residential Building, At Dag No. 218, Khatian No. 60, J.L. No. 56, Mouza -
Dewla, Thana - Tangail Sadar, Dist - Tangail, Bangladesh

t RC.C CAST-IN.SITU PILE

t The averages bearings capacities (F.S.= 3.00) of different pile with the embedment length up to
80ft from EGL of each boring may be considered as follows:

t - 40
- 55
Ton for 20 inch dia pile.
Ton for 24 nch dia pile.

I Note:
a. I Tsf : 1.094 Kg/cm2 = 2ksf, 1 Ton:2000lbs:9.87kN,

t b.
lm= 3.28ft, EGL = Existing Ground level & F. S. = Factor of Safety.

The designer may select any others alternative type, depth as well as the bearing

t c.
capacity ofthe foundation in the light of information provided in this report.
Foundation base should be kept dry during constuction period.
d. Pile loadtest should be perfomted. If Pile load is not performed then the value .

ofpile capacity should be considered half.

T
I 11

I
I SUG{liDilAS

'9,to,17
ProDrietor
MD. MOHIIJDDN
B.Sc. Enee
S[(Dq!
(Civil) Life Fello$' lLts

I
-Fc[ow
No. ?9t3
Sbuchual & Fou.odltion Coosulult

t
I
I
I
I
tl
L]
I

: =(9
^z
==n
==?

==$
-=< ROAD
47',- 6'
=z<
'' YB
= oB
o
= 9<
Eo
ri=
eyr
I I\ 0'
dt- 10'-
ZG
IiE LIJ F

l;a
<o

I @

I e.
F
(9

I
F
uJ

=
-0' /.-\
I E
o
z,
/-\]Tq,
Yd)
Y
-(
rDV
8'- 0'

t =
U)
o
o
Q

I 47',- 6

I't
 SUGANDHA SOIL INVESTIGATOR.

:'clect :8-STORIED RESIDENTIALBUILDING

Bore Hole No: (One)I
Ground Level: (- )0-0"

n -:.;ation : DAG No. 218, KHATIAN No. 60, J.L No. 56,
.,.
: JZA - DEWLA, THANA - TANGAIL SADAR, TANGAIL R. L: (-)0-0'
Ground Water Level: (- ) 7'- 6"

t_ LITHOLOGICAL DESCRIPTION
STANDARD
PENETMTION RESISTANCE

Gray loose to medeium

SAND, some to liftle sitt.

Gary medium SILTY

CLAY, trace fine sand

Blackish gray medium dense

medium fine SANO, some silt,
trace mkx.

o-12

TEsTEDBY:
I 0naY.a'1216
 SUGANDHA SOIL INVESTIGATOR.

Bore Hole No: 2 (Two)

Prqect : 8-SToR|Eo RESIoENTIALBUILDING
Ground Level: (- )0'-0"
Location : DAG No. 218, KHATIAN No. 60, J.t No. 56,
MOUZA - DEWLA, THANA - TANCaAIL SADAR, TANGAIL R. L: (-)04
Ground Water Level: (- ) 7'- 0'

LITHOLOGICAL DESCRIPTION

D-2

Gray loose to medeium

SAND, some to little sitt.
0.3

D4

D5

D4

Gary medium SILTY

D-7
CLAY, trace fine sand

Blackish gray medium densc

medium fine SAND, some silt,
trace mica.

D-12

TEsTED BY:
I
 SUGANDHA SOIL INVESTIGATOR.

Bore Hole No: 3 [fhree)

Project : I - STORIED RESIDENTIAL BUILDING
GroundLevel: (-)0'4"
J. Nq.56,
tsoation: DAG No.2'18, KHATIAN Nq.60,
MOUZA. DEWLA, THANA - TANGAIL SADAR, TANGAIT R. L: (-)0'{"
)
Ground Water Level: ( - 7'- 0'

LITHOLOGICAL DESCRIPTION

ffi cuv

.,

Gray loose to npdeiurn

SAND, some to itt€ silt
I

SILT
&
CLAY

Gary medium SILTY

CLAY, trace fine sand

tr
ffi

Blackish gray nedium dense

medium fine SAND. sorne silt,
trace mica.

@ rr,rrcE
 SUGANDHA SOIL INVESTIGATOR.

Project : 8- STORIED RESIDENTIALBU|LD|NG Bore Hole No: 4 (Four)

Localion : DAG No. 218, KHATTAN No. 60, J.L No. s6, Ground Level: (- ) 0'-0'
MOUZA - DEWLA, THANA - TANGAIL SADAR, TANGAIL R. L: (-)0-0r
Ground Water Level (-) 7-0'

LITHOLOGICAL DESCRIPTION

ffi cuv

Gray loose to rEdeium

SAND, some to little sitt,

SILT
We.
CLAY

Gary medium SlLry

CLAY, trace line sand

I ffi**
r
r D-1

I D-1

t o. Blackish gray medium dense

medium fine SAND, sorE silt,
hace mi\ca.

t D- 1

I
I
r J PERCENT PASSIT'IG

E5
223
Ct-r'- I Bl I
JJE
4aE
e <i <r,
7
7
F
=
e=6
ai7
lrl !Y_;
e
_-

=
2
o
EE< t/' 7
^Qz. UJ

= 4
Fz*"
?P= d,
1 a
:ets
E*{
e.H 6
o_J=
o
o
e
go
l
=

1
6
E
=
=- a
=--i 6
z 5
z = l '6 '6
-!9 E
'6
a
o
F
=
(Il
tF
6
= l o
E
: E

E
E
E
E.
=
E
;
I
E
g
(D E
o o
(.)
tJ-j l9
N
a
z.
=
e
(,.

E
o
F
o
tr
(n
lU

=
)_,
o
U'
I
o
z
(9
=
CJ'

;
o

rl UJ
F
I I1(

I
.--
t G
J PERCENT PASSING

s5
I 2z=
J;e.
5
oea
I
I

t 4 a'-s
323
fia6
F
=
a ]I
4
a
7

t fr?=
d:<_+
EiE<
^@Z
.=
A
f
ci
_/
.J
1
t
UJ
)
E:t
<rr(9<
=
n
€
I

.b a! lu o

t
.,..c!
E€{
e.R 6
o-l= / z
s
o
z -:i n 4
I
e
2f- :1
= E
z 5 c 6

t
'a
E e
z. r1 ; 6 6
l
= 6
I
F
6
= 6
a E
b
P
f,

t
(D E.
e. a a
F d,
CJ)
o o

t UJ
N
a
z.

I
G.
(9

t
t
I to
F
(,
T F
an
uJ

I =
J
6
o
T
o

I =
o
=

I ;
o

I
 J

u-

.c
o-
(, t..
o
E€{ o?
ct o-
EEg o
z, o3=
.E

d.
o
z
lr)

o o ra,

ISd NISSSUI.S ONIUV]HS

rsd Nr ssSErs oNluvlHs

u_
o
cl
o@ q
@
o 1
t o o3
'o
t- z.
-e
IF o-
E
uj 6
at) o
z
z
J o
.o e;
(t, z.
-!P
I o
o
z. -o
(, o
f @
a o rr)
o
ISd NI SS]UIS 9NIUV-IHS
ISd NI SS]U.LS ENIU\EHS
t
t >

t _ E-6
Zz=
o-
a
5
6i

t
_-<
=-iE
I 5 I I

F o
18Q
< c; .r,
i2J
2z< .g I
llJ < (j)
a=2 oe _5

I 6k<
(
ra-r

ffE=
-_f,
s
cl
z.

I
d,r+ a
9z'a E q e
?2*
@ouJ !p
'6 d o <i
.. -.o

I E'€
EEg
ct
{ .q
o

I -e
El
_
a
o

I
F
U)
5

r
=
cn
UJ
i6
I
d
F
ct> P .9
ul pE
F

I
lJ-
o (.)E

G.

ft8

I = .9
ce-=
s 'a
=
=
a E
o

I f
.Ea

#=a

I SE
o- o-
z z z, z. z. z.

r g
q.E
s z, z o-
z, z 2, z

t E
F
(9
tr
Ee

I (o a
uJ
>6
= A=

t
6
<n
&
-
zo iI
(, 5

I o.=
-!P

o 6 o o o o o o o o o o o
P
6 o

I @z