Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
In standard experiments, members are in two different groups. Members of one group
receive special experimental treatment. The other group members, called ‗control group‘ do
not receive special treatment, though they are from the same environment in all other
respects.
But this is not true in engineering, since most of the experiments are not conducted in
laboratories. The subjects of experiments are human beings who are outside the
experimenter‘s control.
Thus it is not possible to study the effects of changes in variable on different groups.
Hence only historical and retrospective data available about various target groups has to be
used for evaluation. Hence engineering as a social experimentation seems to be an extended
usage of the concept of experimentation.
2. INFORMED CONSENT:
It has two elements, knowledge and voluntariness. The subjects (human beings)
should be given all the information needed to make a reasonable decision. Next, they must
get into the experiment without being subjected to force, fraud or deception. Supplying
complete information is neither necessary nor in most cases possible. But all relevant
information needed for making a reasonable decision on whether to participate should be
conveyed. Generally, we all prefer to be the subject of our own experiments rather than those
of somebody else.
3. KNOWLEDGE GAINED
Scientific experiments have been conducted to acquire new knowledge.
engineering projects are conducted as experiments not for getting new knowledge.
Suppose the outcome of the experiment is best it tells us nothing new but affirms that we are
right about something Mean while the unexpected outcomes put us on search for new
knowledge.
ii) Explain the importance of industrial standards. (6)
Among many areas, industry is one which welcomes greater accuracy and quality in
respect of standards.
Standards decrease production cost.
Standards not only help the manufacturers but also benefit the clients and public.
Instead of increasing the brand name can concentrate on industrial standards because
it is becoming necessity in world trade.
The proper role of law in engineering and sincere attempts on regulations have
often failed. It would be wrong to say, rule making and rule following the future.
Good laws effectively enforced.
Moreover, standards serve as a powerful support and defense for those who want to
act ethically.
Interchangibility
Accuracy in measurement
Ease of handling
Prevention of harms
Decrease production cost
Quality products
Etc,.
OR
Reg no:
b) Discuss on the roles played b the codes of ethics set by professional societies. (13)
CODES OF ETHICS - ROLES OR FUNCTIONS
1. Inspiration and Guidance:
Codes provide positive stimulus for ethical conduct and helpful guidance by using
positive language.
Codes should be brief to be effective and hence such codes offer only general
guidance.
Supplementary statements or guidelines to give specific directions are added by a
number of societies or professional bodies.
2. Support:
Codes give positive support to those seeking to act ethically.
An engineer under pressure to act unethically can use one of the publicly proclaimed
codes to get support for his stand on specific moral issues.
Codes also serve as legal support for engineers.
3. Deterrence and discipline:
Codes can be used as a basis for conducting investigations on unethical conduct.
They also provide a deterrent for engineers to act immorally.
Engineers who are punished by professional societies for proven unethical behaviour
by revoking the rights to practice as engineers are also subjected to public ridicule and
loss of respect from colleagues and local community.
This helps to produce ethical conduct even though this can be viewed as a negative
way of motivation.
4. Education and mutual understanding:
The codes can be used for discussion and reflection on moral issues and thereby improve the
understanding of moral responsibilities among all engineers, clients, public and good
organizations.
5. Contributing to the profession‟s public image:
Codes present the engineering profession as an ethically committed society in the eyes of the
public thus enhancing their image.
6. Protecting status quo:
Codes establish ethical conventions, which can help promote an agreed upon minimum level
of ethical conduct.
7. Promoting business interests:
Codes can place unwarranted restraints of commerce on business dealings..codes help to
improve the business interests.
Limitations of Codes of Ethics
Codes are restricted to general and vague wording. They cannot be straightaway
applied to all situations. It is impossible to foresee the full range of moral problems
that can arise in a complex profession like engg
They cannot serve as the final moral authority for professional conduct..
Engineering codes often have internal conflicts.
Only a few practicing engineers are the members of Professional societies and so they
cannot be compelled to abide by their codes.
Many engineers who are the members of professional societies are not aware of the
existence of codes of their societies and they never go through it.
Codes can be reproduced in a very rapid manner.
Codes are said to be coercive.
12.a) Discuss on ‘Engineers as Responsible Experimenters’. (13)
A primary duty is to protect the safety of human beings and respect their right of
consent.
A comprehensive perspective of relevant information.
Unrestricted free personal involvement in all steps of a project.
Reg no:
2.RELEVANT INFORMATION:
1. To understand and grasp the circumstance of a persons work. It is necessary to know how
that work has a moral importance.
2. Blurring the circumstance of a persons work derived from his specialization and division
of labour is to put the responsibilities on some one else in the organization.
The above said means neglecting the importance of persons work also makes
acquiring a full perspective difficult along with a second feature of factual information. So
giving regard to engineering as social experimentation points out the importance of
circumstances of a work and also encourages the engineers to view his specialized activities
in a project as a part of a large social impact.
3.MORAL AUTONOMY
People are morally autonomous when their moral conduct and principles of action are
their own.
Moral beliefs and attitudes must be a critical reflection and not a passive adoption of
the particular conventions of one‘s society, religion or profession.
Moral beliefs and attitudes cannot be agreed to formally and adhered to merely
verbally.
They must be integrated into the core of one‘s personality and should lead to
committed action.
It is wrong to think that as an employee when one performs ‗acts’ serving company‘s
interests, one is no longer morally and personally identified with one‘s actions.
4.ACCOUNTABILITY:
Responsible people accept moral responsibility for their actions.
Accountability is the willingness to submit one‘s actions to moral scrutiny and be
open and responsive to the assessment of others.
It should be understood as being culpable and blameworthy for misdeeds.
OR
b) i) State the necessity of Risk benefit analysis. (7)
Risk-benefit analysis is a method that helps the engineers to analyze the risk in a
project and to determine whether a project should be implemented or not. It is very much
closer to cost-benefit analysis. In risk-benefit analysis, the risks and benefits of a product are
allotted to money amounts, and the most benefitable ratio between risks and benefits is
calculated. But it is a very difficult job, as the risks are much harder to quantify and more
difficult to put a realistic price tag on.
Both risks and benefits lie in future. So, there is a chance for heavy discounting of
future because the present low value of costs or benefits will not give a true picture of future
distresses.
Reg no:
Both have similar uncertainties but at the same time it is very difficult to arrive at
expected values
What are all the benefits of one person may be risk to another
Can we express risks and benefits in a common set of units? For example, when the
risks can be expressed in one set of units (deaths on the high way and benefits in another, we
can find only the ratio of risks to benefits for different designs when comparing the designs.
O Trade Secrets
O Patents
O Copyrights
O Industrial Designs
O Trademarks
O Trade Secrets: When an individual or an organization owns an intellectual property,
does not disclose the property to any one and keeps it as a “secret” to safeguard his
business interests, is called “Trade Secret”.
O Patent: The right granted by government to an inventor to prevent others from
imitating, manufacturing, using or selling his invention for commercial use during a
specified period, is known as “Patent” or Patent Right”
O Trade Secrets: When an individual or an organization owns an intellectual property,
does not disclose the property to any one and keeps it as a “secret” to safeguard his
business interests, is called “Trade Secret”.
O Patent: The right granted by government to an inventor to prevent others from
imitating, manufacturing, using or selling his invention for commercial use during a
specified period, is known as “Patent” or Patent Right”
O Copy right: the copy right is limited both in time and extent. Copy right provides
protection for a specified period from reproduction of materials either in full or in
part.
OR
b) i) Explain in detail the relationship between safety, risk and cost. (7)
It is always a great challenge to engineers to balance quality and safety against cost.
In general, engineer’s tendency is to design and produce high-quality products, but
business managers tend to keep the cost down.
Therefore it is necessary to understand the relationship between safety, costs and price
Safety
Risk High Low
High High safety and high risk high cost, Low safety and high
high price risk, low cost, high price
Examples: Nuclear plant, aircraft, Examples: Automobiles
missiles
Low High safety and low risk high cost, Low safety and low risk,
Medium price low cost and low price
Examples: Electrical products, safety Examples: Electronic
valves. goods, computers.
Personal risk :If sufficient risk given by the person , then he can able to decide
whether to participate in a risky activity or not
Many experiments have concluded that individuals are more willing to face voluntary
risks are more harmful than involuntary ones.
Personal risks are difficult to access especially if they are involuntary personal risks.
Public risk: Risk benefits are public to the at large can be more easily determine than
the personal risks and benefit. Because
Because individual differences are tend to even out as larger number people are
considered
Assessment studies relating to technological safety can be conducted in better manner
for public risk than for personal risk, as statistical parameters take on greater signifance.
14.a) Discuss the concept of confidentiality with respect to professional ethics. (13)
O Keeping confidence or confidentiality is the most important duty of any professional.
O Lawyers must keep clients’ information confidential.
O Doctors must keep information about their patients confidential.
O Teachers must keep personal information about their students confidential.
O Employed engineers must keep information about their companies and clients
confidential
O Confidential information is the information which is desirable to keep secret in a
government department or a private company.
O Engineers and the employees are expected to keep information “confidential”.
O They are expected not to leak out any confidential information to unauthorized people
both inside and outside the company
CONFIDENTIALITY RELATED TERMS :
Privileged information ”(Assignment)
“Proprietary information” (Ownership)
Trade secrets
Patents
Privileged information: is a similar expression for “confidential
information”. Privileged information means the information that will be available
only on the basis of special privileged.
O Special privilege means accorded to an employee working on a special assignment.
O Proprietary information:
“ Proprietary information” is an information that a company owns. It is the
information owned by the proprietor in a legal sense. This means “Property” or
“ownership”.
O Trade Secrets:
Reg no:
It can be any type of information that has not become public and which an
employer has taken steps to keep secret.
O Patents:
Patents legally protect specific products from being manufactured and sold
by competitors without the permission of the patent holder.
OR
b) i) Write short notes on occupational crime. (7)
O Occupational crimes are illegal activities in one’s company or an organization.
O It is the violation of laws regulating the work activities.
O When workers or professionals are committed, occupational crime is called “White –
Collar Crime”
Types of Occupational crimes:
1. Industrial Espionage (industrial spying)
2. Price fixing
3. Endangering Lives
Industrial Espionage (industrial spying)
It means betraying(spy) one’s own company to other companies for his own benefits
or gains.For example, the army secrets, of our own country and atomic energy secret were
once sold to Pakistan.
Price Fixing:
Law prevents companies from fixing the price of a product that will prevent free competition
and trade, but this sort of habit is often violated by many industries.
Endangering Lives:
O Employers who expose their employees to safety harazads escape criminal penalties,
but the victims will sue the companies for compensation under civil law.
O Workers are prone(chances) to diseases like heart diseases, lung diseases, eye
problems when they happen to work in chemical industries.
ii) Discuss the significance of loyalty and collegiality in team work. (6)
O LOYALTY:
O Identification loyalty
Agency loyalty:
Reg no:
It is to fulfill one’s contractual duties to an employer (They not like job, they hate
the employees but still perform their duty as a employer)
Identification loyalty:
O Much concerned with attitudes, emotions and sense of identity.( Employee should
meet his moral duties to the organization)
O Collegiality is the relationship between colleagues.
O Colleagues are those explicitly united in a common purpose and respecting each
other's abilities to work toward that purpose.
O A colleague is an associate in a profession in office.
O the word collegiality can cannot respect for another's commitment they towards the
common purpose and ability to work toward it.
ELEMENTS OFCOLLEGIALITY:
O Respect (give respect for working collegues)
15. a) What is meant by Whistle Blowing? Give example for it. State and explain the
main features that characterize Whistle blowing and the measure to prevent it. (13)
It is alerting relevant persons to some moral or legal corruption, where ‘relevant
persons’ are those in a position to act in response, if only by registering protest.
Ex: politicians to bring out their corruption by publishing articles or informing regulatory
authorities.
1. Rights Ethics
All should have moral rights, and any action that violates these rights is
unethical.
2. Duty Ethics
There are duties that should be performed, without considering much about
moral rights.
3. Utilitarinism
The greatest good is promoted by allowing engineers to practice their
obligations
OR
b) i) What is meant by Respect for authority? How institutional authority differs
from
Expert authority. (7)
SOURCES OF AUTHORITY
1. Institutional Authority
2. Expert Authority
3. Power Authority
Reg no:
Institutional Authority
O It means the institutional right given to a person to exercise the power based on the
resources of the institution.
Expert Authority
O It means the authority given to the individual best qualified to serve their
institution’s goals in a given capacity.
O But in practice, there is not always a perfect match between the authority granted and
the qualification needed to exercise it.
16. a) Briefly discuss the Space Shuttle Challenger accident. What are the ethical
problems involved in this? (15)
OVERVIEW:
• JAN-28,1986 – 7 AUSTRONAUTS KILLED.
• Reason- The failure of the solid rocket booster ‘O’ Rings.
• Failure reasons
– Faulty design
– Joints of O rings
– Temperature testing
– Lacked communication between diff levels of NASA
FAILURE REASON:
• The failure of the solid rocket booster ‘O’ Rings allowed hot combustion gases to leak
from the side of booster and burn through the external fuel tank.
Reg no:
The "Worker Sabotage" point of view argues that it was not physically possible for the water
to enter the tank without concerted human effort, and that extensive testimony and
engineering analysis leads to a conclusion that water entered the tank when a rogue individual
employee hooked a water hose directly to an empty valve on the side of the tank. This point
of view further argues that the Indian government took extensive actions to hide this
possibility in order to attach blame to UCC.
Theories differ as to how the water entered the tank. At the time, workers were cleaning out a
clogged pipe with water about 400 feet from the tank. They claimed that they were not told to
isolate the tank with a pipe slip-blind plate. The operators assumed that owing to bad
maintenance and leaking valves, it was possible for the water to leak into the tank.
This water entry route could not be reproduced despite strenuous efforts by motivated
parties. UCC claims that a "disgruntled worker" deliberately connecting a hose to a pressure
gauge connection was the real cause.
Early the next morning, a UCIL manager asked the instrument engineer to replace the gauge.
UCIL's investigation team found no evidence of the necessary connection; the investigation
was totally controlled by the government, denying UCC investigators access to the tank or
interviews with the operators
Causes of the disaster: The "corporate negligence" argument
This point of view argues that management (and to some extent, local government)
underinvested in safety, which allowed for a dangerous working environment to develop.
Factors cited include the filling of the MIC tanks beyond recommended levels, poor
maintenance after the plant ceased MIC production at the end of 1984, allowing several
safety systems to be inoperable due to poor maintenance, and switching off safety systems to
save money— including the MIC tank refrigeration system which could have mitigated the
disaster severity, and non-existent catastrophe management plans. Other factors identified by
government inquiries included undersized safety devices and the dependence on manual
operations Specific plant management deficiencies that were identified include the lack of
skilled operators, reduction of safety management, insufficient maintenance, and inadequate
emergency action plans.
The Little report argues that this evidence demonstrates that the following chronology
took place:
At 10:20pm, the tank was at normal pressure, indicating the absence of water.
At 10:45pm, a shift change took place, after which the MIC storage area "would be
completely deserted".
During this period, a "disgruntled operator entered the storage area and hooked up one
of the readily available rubber water hoses to Tank 610, with the intention of
contaminating and spoiling the tank's contents."
Water began to flow, beginning the chemical reaction that caused the disaster.
After midnight, control room operators saw the pressure rising and realized there was
a problem with Tank 610. They discovered the water connection, and decided to
transfer one ton of the contents out to try and remove the water.
The disaster then occurred, a major release of poisonous gas.
The cover-up activities discovered during the investigation then took place.
After over 30 years, S.P. Choudhary, former MIC Production Manager, broke the
silence and told the truth about the disaster that it was not an accident but the result of
a sabotage that claimed thousands of lives, a former official of the Union Carbide
India Limited (UCIL) told the district and sessions court.
Reg no: