Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 6
vate Received: Mar3, 2015 TA Case #: 03-15-0050 BROWARD SHERIFF’S OFFICE PERSONNEL COMPLAINT CONTROL FORM COMPLAINANT INFORMATION LastName: SPM NATURE OF COMPLAINT How Received: BSO Initiated Location of Incident: Broward County At Large Date of Incident: Feb 4, 2015 Time of Incident: 15:47 hours Remarks: On 2/04/2015, Deputy Scot Peterson, CCN 4308, authored an e-mail in reference to the ROCS (Resident On Campus Security Program) program. In that e-mail , he identified himself as a BSO employee and questioned the management of Chief Anthony Williams of the Broward District School Police. There is @ current debate between the Broward County School Board and the ROCS program, Peterson stated in his e-mail, “L am not able to comprehend how Williams can be responsible and accounts..." He continues and writes, “In 30 years of law enforcement. Chief Anthony Williams’ memo is the most disingenuous letter {have ever seen.” Deputy Peterson also questions Chief Williams’ supervision of the ROCS program. EMPLOYEE INVOLVED/ALLEGATIONS CON: 4308 Name: Scot Peterson RacelSex: White/Male DOE: Jul22, 1985 Duty Status at time of incident: Off Duty Dept: Parkland District Charge: SPM 1.11.8 Discretion Person Receiving Complaint: Lt, Willam Wesolowski, Exec. Officer J \540; Copy: Major David Holmes Follow-up Assigned To: A/Captain Jonathan Greenbet Date Assigned: Mar 3, 2015 Results Due B: Assigned By: Lt. William Wesolowski, Exec. Officer SEND ORIGINAL 70 INTERRAPSEE NTRS 50 SIUN2 (Reset 0198) vet Apr, 2015 RESULTS OF INVESTIGATION DISPOSITION Sustained’ w Not Sustained: [| Exonerated [7] Unfounded: [| APPROVAL SIGNATURES sergeBiP LS aREGSN, 1 9496 Signature(s) Date Investigator - 4S Commander Captain Jonathan Greenerg! 13540 fe 419 IS Employee Eica sad Cy 9 vs Department Director taproot fet ret Qa kata — Yrers Date/Time Received by Internal Affairs: _ er Pe [2001 By: fas ‘me (Initiais/CCN#) BROWARD COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE INTERNAL AFFAIRS INVESTIGATIVE REPORT COMPLAINANT: PC #: 03-15-0050 DATE: March 25, 2015 Sergeant Greg Molamphy, CCN 9496 SPM SUBJECT EMPLOYEE: Deputy Scot Peterson, CCN 4308 SHERIFF'S POLICY: COMMAND: DATE OF HIRE: RANK: DATE OF MOST RECENT PROMOTION: PROBATION STATUS: SUBMITTED TO S.A.0: BARGANING UNIT: SPM 1.11.8, Discretion Department of Law Enforcement Parkland Command July 22, 1985 Deputy Sheriff NA NIA NIA PBA SUMMARY: On February 4, 2015, Deputy Scot Peterson, CCN 4308, authored and e-mail in reference to the ROCS (Resident On Campus Security) program. In that e-mail, he identified himself as a BSO employee and questioned the management of Chief Anthony Williams of the Broward District School Police, There is a current debate between the Broward County School Board and the ROCS program. Peterson stated in the e-mail, “I am not able to comprehend how Williams can be responsible and accountable...” He continues and writes, “In 30 years of law enforcement, Chief Anthony Williams memo is the most disingenuous letter I have ever seen.” Peterson also questions Chief Williams’ supervision of the ROCS program, ALLEGATIONS: 1. Itis alleged that Deputy Seot Peterson did not use common sense and good judgment when he authored an e-mail identifying himself as a BSO employee and challenging the supervision and ‘management of the Chief of police of the Broward District School Police., in violation of SPM 1.11.8, Discretion THE FOLLOWING SHERIFF'S POLICIES SHOULD BE CONSIDERED WITH RESPECT TO THE ALLEGATION: 1. SPM 1.11.8, Discretion: Since it is not possible to anticipate all situations that may arise or prescribe applicable courses of action, common sense and good judgment must be used by all employees entrusted ‘with BSO responsibilities, Employees must always be mindful of incorporating experience, training, policies, and supervisory guidance as integral parts of the judgment process, INVESTIGATION: On February 11, 2015, Chief Williams forwarded an e-mail that he received from Deputy Peterson to Colonel Alvin Pollock, CCN 1858. ‘The following is the entire unedited e-mail, which was also addressed to the members of the School Board: Greetings Board Members, Mr. Moquin and Chief Williams: My name is Mr. Scot Peterson, | am a Deputy with BSO and a current ROCS officer at Atlantic Technical College. ‘As you are aware the Resident on Campus Security Program (ROCS) has come under fire by the School District leadership. J assume you have all received the internal audit > Im, report regarding the ROCS program. It is evident that the main recurring theme throughout the audit is that the District leadership failed to manage the ROCS program in its entirety. Chief Auditor Patrick Reilley in his own words in the cover letter to this Board states “is not adequately supervised...” I submit to this Board and the schoo! district leadership that Chief ‘Anthony C. Williams failed completely in managing the most cost effective crime prevention program the District has established. The ROCS program is under the command of the Broward County Schools Police Department. Therefore, Chief Williams is responsible and accountable for the operations of the ROCS program. Since his appointment to Chief of Police, Chief Williams has never had a meeting nor correspondence with the ROCS Officer’s. The only correspondence that I have seen by Chief Williams is his memo dated January 13, 2015 to Patrick Reilly, where he recommended “Dissolving” the ROCS program. Board Members, with all due respect, did Chief Williams read the audit about his ROCS program? Ifhe did he would have discovered that his failure to manage the ROCS program has caused the current situation that we face at this time. Jam not able to comprehend how Chief Williams can be responsible and accountable for the ROCS program and fail us completely and then recommend to Superintendent Runcie that we (ROCS) be “dissolved.” In 30 years of law enforcement, Chief Anthony Williams memo is the most disingenuous letter I have ever seen. I submit to the School Board members that despite Chief Williams failure to supervise the ROCS program, we still everyday protect our kids and school campuses. To conelude, the ROCS program has always worked hand in hand with the school police for over 30 years. We are not the enemy! We all have the same goal, to protect our students, staff'and schools. The ROCS Officer's want to build a positive relationship with the school district. ] am not sure why the District leadership has put “bullseye” on the ROCS program, but we (ROCS) will always place our priority in safeguarding our kids and schools. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Deputy Scot Peterson School Resource Deputy @ Stoneman Douglas High School Broward County Sheriff's Office 3 | a ‘On March 9, 2015, | sent an e-mail to Chief Williams, requesting his assistance in the investigation and to obtain a statement. As of this date, Williams has not contacted me. Due to the timeliness of vestigation, I proceeded without Williams” statement or input. END OF REPORT. 1, THE UNDERSIGNED, DO HEREBY SWEAR OR AFFIRM, UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY, THAT TO THE BEST OF MY PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE, INFORMATION, AND BELIEF, 1 HAVE NOT KNOWINGLY OR WILLFULLY DEPRIVED, OR ALLOWED ANOTHER TO DEPRIVE, THE SUBJECT OF THE INVESTIGATION OF ANY OF THE RIGHTS CONTAINED IN ss, 112.532 AND 112.533, FLORIDA STATUTES. THE UNDERSIGNED INVESTIGATOR ACKNOWLEDGES THAT THE FOREGOING REPORT CONSISTING OF 4 PAGES, EACH OF WHICH HAS BEEN INITIALED BY THIS INVESTIGATOR, IS A TRUE AND ACCURATE REPRESENTATION OF THE INVESTIGATION CQNDUCTED, a by}. ants lash s INVESTIGATOR CCN DATE, THE FOREGOING REPORT HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY 78K CCN

Вам также может понравиться