Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
November, 2016
List II (State)
Impact of 101st
• 46. Taxes on agricultural income.
Amendment, 2016
• 47. Duties in respect of succession to agricultural land. Inserted new Entries-54 & 62 &
• 48. Estate duty in respect of agricultural land. Omitted 52 & 55
• 49. Taxes on lands and buildings.
• 50. Taxes on mineral rights subject to any limitations imposed by Parliament by law relating to mineral development.
• 51. Duties of excise on the following goods manufactured or produced in the State and countervailing duties at the same or lower rates on similar goods manufactured
or produced elsewhere in India:— (a) alcoholic liquors for human consumption; (b) opium, Indian hemp and other narcotic drugs and narcotics, but not including
medicinal and toilet preparations containing alcohol or any substance included in sub-paragraph (b) of this entry.
• 52. Taxes on the entry of goods into a local area for consumption, use or sale therein.
• 53. Taxes on the consumption or sale of electricity.
• 54. Taxes on the sale or purchase of goods other than newspapers, subject to the provisions of entry 92A of List I.
• 55. Taxes on advertisements other than advertisements published in the newspapers and advertisements broadcast by radio or television.
• 56. Taxes on goods and passengers carried by road or on inland waterways.
• 57. Taxes on vehicles, whether mechanically propelled or not, suitable for use on roads, including tramcars subject to the provisions of entry 35 of List III.
• 58. Taxes on animals and boats.
• 59. Tolls.
• 60. Taxes on professions, trades, callings and employments.
• 61. Capitation taxes.
• 62. Taxes on luxuries, including taxes on entertainments, amusements, betting and gambling.
• 63. Rates of stamp duty in respect of documents other than those specified in the provisions of List I with regard to rates of stamp duty.
Ombudsman Ombudsman
?s of law (tax)
Supreme Court
Committee of Disputes High Courts & its Benches
Disputes Resolution Panel (DRP) –
Transfer Pricing
(States)
STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL AND FOR INTERNAL PURPOSES ONLY 12
Tax Return Preparers Scheme (TRPS)
Tax Structure & Governance: Administration*
Direct & Indirect Taxes: Differences
CBDT and CBEC were established on April 1, 1964. Before they were set up, the Central Board of Revenue (CBR) administered all central taxes.
Source: 1st Report TARC, 30/5/2014; GoI STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL AND FOR INTERNAL PURPOSES ONLY 13
Source: 1st Report TARC, 2014; GoI STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL AND FOR INTERNAL PURPOSES ONLY 14
Taxes can be classified and analyzed on the basis of
• Features
• Direct and indirect
• Forms
• Tax on income, capital (wealth tax; possessing the capital), parting with wealth during ones life time (gift tax),
bequeathing wealth after death (estate duty)
• Tax on manufacture or production of goods (excise duty), importing goods from abroad (customs duty)
• Character
• Regressive (e.g. match box, groceries, etc.,), proportional (e.g. flat rate of 20% of taxable income) and progressive
(e.g. graduated rates of tax slab system)
• Degressive, (mix of progressive tax and proportional tax. The rate increases to a limit. thereafter, uniform rate. Rate
does not increase in the same proportion as the increase in income. Higher income make less sacrifice than the
lower income category) SISMONDI'S RULES OF TAXATION: every tax should fall upon the revenue and not upon the
capital; taxation should never touch what is necessary for the existence of the contributor, and taxation should not
put to flight the capital it tries to strike at.
• Canons
• Ability, certainty, convenience, economy, productivity, elasticity and simplicity (refer Public Finance – Text books)
• Jurisdiction
• Source (India: Schedular on character and global in nature), Status (Nationality; Citizenship, Residence of in the
Country and Domicile of person; u/s 2(31)- Person) : International Taxation- relevancy and emphasis.
Ref: Central Board of Revenue Act, 1963 (Divides taxes)
STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL AND FOR INTERNAL PURPOSES ONLY 15
Case laws
• There is the declaration of liability, that is the part of the statute which
determines what persons in respect of what property are liable.
• Next, there is the assessment. Liability does not, depend on assessment.
That, 'ex hypothesi' has already been fixed. But assessment particularises
the exact sum which a person liable has to pay.
• Lastly, come the methods of recovery, if the person taxed does not
voluntarily pay.
1. The first is the character of the imposition known by its nature which prescribes the taxable event
attracting the levy.
2. The second is a clear indication of the person on whom the levy is imposed and who is obliged to pay the
tax
3. The third is the rate at which the tax is imposed.
4. The fourth is the measure or value to which the rate will be applied for computing the tax liability.
• If these components are not clearly and definitely ascertainable it is difficult to say that the
levy exists in point of law. Any uncertainty or vagueness in the legislative scheme defining
any of those components of the levy will be fatal to its validity.
STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL AND FOR INTERNAL PURPOSES ONLY 26
Matthews v The Chicory Marketing Board (Victoria) (1938) 60 CLR 263
(9 August 1938) High Court of Australia referred in
Commissioner HR & CE v Lakshmendra (1954) SCI
Meaning of tax
• A taxing statute will be struck down as violative of Art. 14 if there is no reasonable basis behind the classification made
by it, or, if the game class of property, similarly situated, is subjected to unequal taxation.
• Whether a particular tax is discriminatory or not must necessarily be considered in light of the nature and incidence of
that particular tax and cannot be judged by what has been held in the context of other taxes except the general
propositions. The precedents relating to property taxes such was as land tax, building tax, plantation tax, and even
income tax or a service tax will not be of direct relevance to a luxury tax, as it is neither a property tax, nor an income tax
but a tax on the provision for luxury. In case of tax on provision for luxury different aspects peculiar to the tax have to be
borne in mind…
• What exactly is meant by equality in taxation may, have to be looked at from different angles in different kinds of taxes.
• The ability or capacity to pay has no doubt been regarded as the test in determining the justness or equality of
taxation. It is the goal towards which the system has been, as it must be, steadily working.
• Taxation will not be discriminatory if, within the sphere of its operation, it affects alike all persons similarly situated. It,
however, does not prohibit special legislation, or legislation that is limited either in the objects to which it is directed, or
by the territory within which it is to operate.
• also refer: Godfrey Phillips(I)Ltd.& Anr vs State Of U.P.& Ors 20 January, 2005 Supreme Court (5 Judges)
(1) Whether, alimony received by the assessee under Section 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, on nullity of marriage, is
income in her hands and liable to tax ?
• In the negative and in favour of the assessee. (capital receipt)
(2) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the alimony of Rs. 750 per month received by the assessee
from her ex-husband on the nullity of marriage is income in her hands liable to tax?
• In the affirmative and against the assessee. (revenue receipt)(Refer in the case of Princess Maheshwari Devi of Pratapgarh v CIT on 15 July, 1982, Bom
HC)
STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL AND FOR INTERNAL PURPOSES ONLY 30
Kone Elevator India Pvt. Ltd v State of TN
(2014) 7 SCC 1 [Constitutional Bench - 5 Judges]
• Principles - “contract for sale of goods” and “works contract”
(a) the works contract is an indivisible contract but, by legal fiction, is divided into two parts, one for
sale of goods, and the other for supply of labour and services; it is only if there are clearly two
contracts, one for supply of goods only and a second one for supply of labour and service only, that
they can be treated separately and not as a composite contract.
(b) the concept of “dominant nature test” or, for that matter, the “degree of intention test” or
“overwhelming component test” for treating a contract as a works contract is not applicable.
(c) the term “works contract” as used in Article 366(29A) of the Constitution takes in its sweep all
genre of works contract and is not to be narrowly construed to cover one species of contract to
provide for labour and service alone.
(d) once the characteristics of works contract are met with in a contract entered into between the
parties, any additional obligation incorporated in the contract would not change the nature of the
contract.
• (Also Refer State of A.P v Kone Elevators (India) Ltd (2005) 3 SCC 389)
• Vodafone
the principles which should govern the interpretation of Section 195 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 can be formulated as follows
i. Section 195(1) provides for a tentative deduction VBC 146 wp1325.10 of income-tax, subject to a regular assessment;
ii. Section 195 postulates two requirements: Firstly, there is a person responsible for paying to a non resident, any interest or other sum. Secondly, the interest
or other sum must be chargeable under the provisions of the Act, other than under the head of salaries;
iii. The obligation to deduct tax arises where the sum payable to a non-resident is chargeable to tax under the provisions of the Act. For the obligation to deduct
to arise, the entire sum payable need not be income chargeable under the Act. If the sum payable to a non-resident represents income or if income is hidden
or otherwise embedded in it, tax is required to be deducted on the sum. The obligation of the assessee in that event is to deduct tax under Section 195
limited to the appropriate portion of income chargeable under the Act;
iv. The liability to deduct tax arises if the tax is assessable in India. If the tax is not assessable in India, there is no question of TDS being deducted by an assessee;
v. The general principle of fiscal legislation is that given a sufficient territorial connection or nexus between the person sought to be charged and the country
seeking to tax him, income tax may extend to that person. The connection can be based on the residence of the person or a business connection within the
territory of a taxing State or a situation within the State of the money or property from which the taxable income is derived;
vi. TDS provisions which are in the nature of machinery provisions constitute an integrated Code under the Act of 1961 together with charging provisions. Hence,
those provisions are not independent of the charging provisions which determine assessability to tax;
vii. Whether a payment made by a foreign company in foreign currency abroad can be deemed to accrue or arise in India, would depend upon an examination of
the facts and circumstances of each case. In Eli Lily the payment made abroad by the foreign company was for the rendition of service in India and no work
was found to have been performed for the foreign company. Such a payment was held to fall within the ambit of Section 192(1) read with Section 9(1)(ii). The
Indian company was liable to deduct tax on the aggregate salary received by the expatriates including payments made by the foreign company;
viii. Parliament, while imposing a liability to deduct tax has designedly imposed it on a person responsible for paying interest or any other sum to a non resident.
Parliament has not restricted the obligation to deduct tax on a resident and the Court will not imply a restriction not imposed by legislation. Section 195
embodies a machinery that would render tax collection effective and must be construed to effectuate the charge of tax. There is no limitation of extra
territoriality involved though Parliament is cognisant of the fact that the provisions of the law can be enforced within the territory to which the Act extends.
ix. Johan Steyn, "Contract Law: Fulfilling the Reasonable Expectations of Honest Men" (1997) 113 LQR 433, at 433-434
STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL AND FOR INTERNAL PURPOSES ONLY 35
Continued Vodafone case…
Tax planning versus colorable devices;
the following principles are now firmly embedded in our jurisprudence :
i) A transaction or arrangement which is permissible under law which has the effect of reducing the tax burden
of an assessee does not incur the wrath of the law;
ii) Citizens and business entities are entitled to structure or plan their affairs with circumspection and
within the framework of law with a view to reduce the incidence of tax;
iii) A transaction which is sham or which is a colourable device cannot be countenanced. A transaction
which is sham or a colourable device is one in which the parties while ostensibly seeking to clothe the
transaction with a legal form, actually engage in a different transaction altogether. A transaction which serves
no business purpose other than the avoidance of tax is not a legitimate business transaction and in the
application of fiscal legislation can be disregarded. Such transactions involve only a pretense and a facade to
avoid compliance with tax obligations;
iv) Absent a case of a transaction which is sham or a colourable device, an assessee is entitled to
structure business through the instrument of genuine legal frameworks. An act which is otherwise valid in
law cannot be disregarded merely on the basis of some underlying motive resulting in some economic
detriment or prejudice. In interpreting a fiscal statute it is not the economic result sought to be obtained by
making the provision which is of relevance and the duty of the Court is to follow the plain and unambiguous
language of the statute.
STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL AND FOR INTERNAL PURPOSES ONLY 36
STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL AND FOR INTERNAL PURPOSES ONLY 37
STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL AND FOR INTERNAL PURPOSES ONLY 38
STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL AND FOR INTERNAL PURPOSES ONLY 39
Basic Concepts & Aspects in Income Tax law
• Can’t make taxable profit out of himself or surplus arising to a mutual concern for mutual benefit of members, raising
contribution to common fund; identity between contributors as a class and the participants of the benefits and surplus
of the class exists – NOT INCOME. CIT v Cement Allocation & Co-ordination org (1999) 236 ITR 553 (SC)
• Relief or reimbursement, personal gifts [Section 56(2)] – NOT INCOME
• Double taxation can be generally arises due to the imposition of comparable taxes in two (or more) States on the same
– taxpayers, subject matter, periods, same authorities (in domestic law situation), taxes (taxable events) : effects on
exchange of goods and services and movements of capital, technology and persons
STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL AND FOR INTERNAL PURPOSES ONLY 41
Section 2 (25A) of Income-tax Act
Financial
Assessee
“India” means
Year • Territory of India as per Article 1 of Constitution
Previous • Its territorial waters, seabed and subsoil
Year underlying such waters
(FY/PY) • Continental shelf
• Exclusive economic zone or
Assessment • Any other maritime zone referred to in Territorial
Year (AY) Waters, Continental Shelf, Exclusive Economic
Zone and other Maritime Zone Act, 1976 and
• The air space above its territory and
• Territorial waters
NOTE:
1. If above stated both 2 Tests are not met, then status is “Non-Resident”
2. CONFIDENTIAL
STRICTLY ResidentialAND
Status of Firm,
FOR INTERNAL AOP,ONLY
PURPOSES BOI is either Resident or Non-resident.
43
Taxability (Section 9)
Resident OR Resident but not Non Resident (NR)
Tax incidence – Scenarios* Resident & Ordinary Ordinary Resident
resident (ROR) (RNOR)
Income received OR deemed to be received
OR accruing or arising in India OR deemed to
YES YES YES
accrue or arise in India (whether accrued in or
outside India)
Income received and accrued outside India
from a business controlled or a profession set YES YES NO
up in India
Income received and accrued outside India
from a business controlled or a profession set YES NO NO
up outside India
Income earned and received outside India NO NO NO
Registered Valuers
Wealth-tax Act
1956*
assessment
• Service Tax 7.
gambling
Taxes on Advertisements
• Purchase Tax 8.
9.
Octroi & Entry Tax
State Cesses and Surcharges
• Octroi and Entry Tax
Others: Professional tax, Property tax,
Waste tax (cess-BBMP)
NOTE: Single Tax to replace multiple levies, right from manufacture/supplier to consumer.
STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL AND FOR INTERNAL PURPOSES ONLY 54
As per the FAQ’s published by Govt.
What is GST
It is a destination based tax on consumption of goods and services. It is proposed to be levied at all
stages right from manufacture up to final consumption with credit of taxes paid at previous stages
available as setoff. In a nutshell, only value addition will be taxed and burden of tax is to be borne by
the final consumer.
What is IGST
Under the GST regime, an Integrated GST (IGST) would be levied and collected by the Centre on inter-
State supply of goods and services. Under Article 269A of the Constitution, the GST on supplies in the
course of inter-State trade or commerce shall be levied and collected by the Government of India and
such tax shall be apportioned between the Union and the States in the manner as may be provided by
Parliament by law on the recommendations of the Goods and Services Tax Council.
Concept of “destination based tax on consumption”
The tax would accrue to the taxing authority which has jurisdiction over the place of consumption
which is also termed as place of supply.
“Taxable Event” (TE) under GST & Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM)
Supply of goods and/or services. CGST & SGST will be levied on intra-state supplies while IGST will be
levied on inter-state supplies. The Charging section is section 7 (1) of CGST/SGST Act and Section 4(1) of
the IGST Act. Reverse Charge Mechanism applicable to goods and services.
India 3 tier federal Structure (Union Govt., State Govts. and 2015-16 5.47
Why GST:
• Levy of CST “Example Review”
• Multiple State levies Evaluation of Direct Taxes
CBDT 1st time released
• Cascading of taxes Granular statistics of returns filed
• Double taxation as both goods and services by assesses for AY 2012-13
• Non-integration of VAT and Service Tax Corporate less than 2% but
account >60% of total tax liability
• No Cenvat after manufacturing Stage • Individuals -2.89 cr
• Companies – 5.81 Lakhs
• HUF – 8.40 L
• Firms – 8.59 L
• AOP/BOI – 17.492
• Sector wise approach/ Entrepreneurship (Start Up) • High/Peak 28% (White Goods – TV)
Gold, Services (Ongoing)
(i) Simplicity and comprehensibility of both structure and content thereby making the statute more user friendly.
(ii) Ensuring tax buoyancy by tapping high capacity/income and evasion prone segments.
(iii) Re-orienting departmental resources towards high-capacity as well as avoidance/evasion prone categories/sectors.
(iv) Modernisation and computerisation of all tax operations; equipping the department with men and material to carry out the tasks
assigned.
(v) Moderation in tax rates for individual taxpayers with emphasis on voluntary compliance.
(vi) Deductions for individual taxpayers to be focused on long term needs like social security.
(vii) The age for senior citizens may be relaxed from 65 years to 60 years.
(viii) Area base incentives may be considered on investment linked basis. However, the general principle should be that all incomes and
profits are to be taxed and exemptions, if any, should be treated as a dynamic variable, by ensuring that each exemption serves an
economic purpose.
(ix) Smooth transition to investment linked incentives with focused coverage.
(x) Maintaining uniformity in ‘grandfathering’ provisions so that the available benefits for different categories under the existing Income-
tax Act are phased out in a uniform and non-discriminatory manner ensuring smooth transition to DTC provisions.