Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
For a given infinite series {vk (n)}k≥0, suppose that the series satisfies the
following conditions:
m(n) ∞
lim vk (n) = wk = W
n→∞
k=0 k=0
Proof. For any given ε > 0, first choose a number = (ε) such that
∞
Mk < ε and then let n be taken large enough to make m(n) > . This
k=
m(n) m(n)
leads us consequently to the following inequality: vk ≤ Mk < ε.
k= k=
150 CHU Wenchang and DI CLAUDIO Leontina
∞ ∞
Noting also that wk ≤ Mk < ε, we can estimate the difference
k= k=
m(n) m(n) ∞ −1
v (n) − W ≤ vk (n) + wk + vk (n) − wk
k
k=0 k= k= k=0
−1
< 2ε + vk (n) − wk .
k=0
Remember that so far n has only been restricted by the condition m(n) > .
Since is independent of n, we can allow n to tend to infinity and obtain
−1
lim vk (n) − wk = 0 for lim vk (n) = wk with k being fixed.
n→∞ n→∞
k=0