Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Art. 1935 – The bailees in commodatum acquires the eye of Art. 1948. Exception to Art. 1946
the thing loaned but not is fruits, unless there is stipulation Art. 1949. See Articles
that the bailed may make use of the fruits of the things loaned
Prepared by the CIVIL LAW SECTION Chief NORBERT OBEDOZA Assistant Chief JOHN PAUL MARTIN Members LIWLIWA AGBAYANI,
ELMER PEDROZO, ALLAN ANCHETA, JONATHAN FERNANDEZ, GARY DE GUZMAN, EIGEE GALACGAC and YVALLONE LAMATON.
All Rights Reserved by the SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF LAW BAR OPERATIONS 2003.
CIVIL LAW REVIEWER
2 SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY BAR OPERATIONS
1. Extraordinary expenses for the preservation of the borrower shall pay its value at the time of the
thing loaned. perfection of the loan.
Such expenses shall be borne by the bailor
(e.g., expenses for repairing borrowed house Art. 1955
damaged by a typhoon). * Requisites for recovery of interest:
1. The payment of interest must be
2. Extraordinary expenses arising from actual use of expressly stipulated.
the thing loaned. 2. The agreement must be in writing
Such expenses shall be borne by the bailor and 3. The interest must be lawful
bailee alike on a 50-50 basis (e.g., expenses for
repairing a borrowed jeep damaged in a * Liability for interest even in the absence of stipulation:
collision.) 1. Indemnity for damages
The debtor in delay is liable to
Art. 1950. See Article pay legal interest (6%/12%) as an indemnity
for damages even in the absence of
Art. 1951. See Article. On exception to Art. 1944 stipulation for the payment of interest.
* The following are the requisites which must 2. Interest Accruing from unpaid interest
concern for the application of the above article. Interest due shall earn interest
1. There is flaw or defect in the thing from the time it is judicially demanded
loaned. although the obligation may be silent upon
2. The flaw or defect is hidden. this point.
3. The bailor is aware thereof.
4. He does not advise the bailee of the Art. 1957. See Article
same. Art. 1958. See Article
5. The bailee suffers damages by reason
of said flaw or defect. Art. 1959 –
* When unpaid interest earns interest.
Art. 1952.See Article As a general rule, accrued interest shall not earn
interest except in two instances.
1. When judicially demanded as provided
Simple Loan or Mutuum for in Art. 2212, and
2. When there is an express stipulation
Art. 1953. See Articles made by the parties to witness that the
interest due and unpaid shall be added
* Simple loan, or mutuum – is a contract whereby one of the to the principal obligation and the
parties delivers to another many or other consumable thing resulting total amount shall earn
with the understanding that the same amount of the same interest.
kind and quality shall be said.
Art. 1960. See Article in relation to Art. 2154 and Art. 1423.
* Tangible things – are those which are usually dealt with by Art. 1961. See Article
number, weight or measure such as rise, oil, sugar etc. so that
any given unit or portion is treated as the equivalent of any xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
other unit or portion.
Art. 1954 –
*Barter or Exchange – one of the parties finds himself to give DEPOSIT
one thing in consideration of the other’s promise to give (Arts. 1962 - 2009)
another thing.
Art. 1955
* Form of Payment Deposit in General and is Different Kinds:
1. Loan of Money
If the thing loaned is money, payment must Art. 1962. –
be made in the currency stipulated, if it is * Definition of deposit – first
possible to deliver such currency; sentence
otherwise, it is payable in the currency * When there is no deposit –
which is legal tender in the Philippines (Art. second sentence
1249) and in case of extraordinary inflation Art. 1963. See Article
or deflation, the basis of payment shall be Art. 1964. –
the value of the currency at the time of the * Kinds of Deposit
creation of the obligation (Art.1250). Deposit is either:
1. Judicial or one which takes place
Loan of Tangible Thing when an attachment or seizure of
If what was loaned is a fungible thing other property in litigation is ordered. (Arts.
than money, the borrower is under obligation to pay 2005 - 2008)
the lender another thing of the same kind, quality, 2. Extrajudicial (Art.1967) which maybe;
and quantity. It case it is impossible to do so, the
Prepared by the CIVIL LAW SECTION Chief NORBERT OBEDOZA Assistant Chief JOHN PAUL MARTIN Members LIWLIWA AGBAYANI,
ELMER PEDROZO, ALLAN ANCHETA, JONATHAN FERNANDEZ, GARY DE GUZMAN, EIGEE GALACGAC and YVALLONE LAMATON.
All Rights Reserved by the SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF LAW BAR OPERATIONS 2003.
CIVIL LAW REVIEWER
3 SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY BAR OPERATIONS
- The depository shall only be found to return the price he may 2. The loss is due to the acts of the guests, his family
received or to assign his right of action against the buyer in case servants, or visitors (Art. 2002), and
the price has not been paid him. 3. The loss arises from the character of the things
If the heir acts in bad faith, he is liable for damages. brought into the hotel. (Ibid).
The sale or appropriation of the thing deposited
constitutes estafa. (Art. 315, par. 1[b], RPC). Art. 2003. See Article
Art. 2047
NECESSARY DEPOSIT Guaranty is a contract whereby a person binds himself
to the creditor to fulfill the obligation of the principal debtor
When deposit necessary? in case the latter should fail to do so.
1. When it is made in compliance with a legal obligation, Classification of guaranty
(Art. 1996) 1. As to its origin:
2. When it takes place on the occasion of any calamity, a. Conventional – one constituted by
(Art. 1996) agreement of the parties, (Art. 2051 par.1)
3. When it is made by travelers in hotels or inns, (art. b. Legal – one imposed by virtue of a provision
1998) of law. (Ibid)
4. When it is made by passengers with common carriers, c. Judicial – one required by a court to
(Art.1754) guarantee the eventual right of one of the
parties in a case. (Ibid)
Art. 1997. See Article 2. As to Consideration:
a. Gratuitous – one where the guarantor does
Art. 1999. See Article not receive any price or remuneration for
acting as such, (Art. 2048), or
b. Onerous – one where the guarantor
Art. 2000 – Art. 2001 – Art. 2002 receives valuables consideration for his
guaranty. (Ibid)
When hotel keeper liable? 3. As to the person guaranteed:
1. The loss or injury is caused by his servants or a. Single – one constituted solely to guarantee
employees as well as by strangers (AR. 2000) or secure performance by the debtor of the
provided that notice has been given and proper principal obligation (Art. 2051,par. 2)
precautions taken (Art. 1998); and b. Double or sub-guaranty – one constituted to
2. the loss is cause by the act of a thief or robber done secure the fulfillment by the guarantor of a
without the use of arms and irresistible force. (Art. prior guaranty. (Ibid)
2001) 4. As to its scope and extent:
a. Definite –one where the guaranty is limited
When hotel keeper not liable? to the principal obligation only, or to a
1. The loss or injury is caused by force majeure, unless specific portion thereof. (Art. 2055, par. 2)
he is guilty of fault or negligence in failing to provide b. Indefinite or Simple – one where the
against loss or injury from his cause. (Art 1170, 1174). guaranty includes not only the principal but
also it accessories.
Prepared by the CIVIL LAW SECTION Chief NORBERT OBEDOZA Assistant Chief JOHN PAUL MARTIN Members LIWLIWA AGBAYANI,
ELMER PEDROZO, ALLAN ANCHETA, JONATHAN FERNANDEZ, GARY DE GUZMAN, EIGEE GALACGAC and YVALLONE LAMATON.
All Rights Reserved by the SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF LAW BAR OPERATIONS 2003.
CIVIL LAW REVIEWER
6 SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY BAR OPERATIONS
Art. 2049 Art. 2059. See article is relation to Art. 2060 and Art. 2084.
A guaranty may secure the performance of; Requirements before a guarantor may make sure of
a. Voidable contract inasmuch as such the benefit of excussion.
contract is binding, unless it is annulled by a 1. He must set it up against the creditor upon the latter’s
proper action is court. demand for payment from him, and
b. An unenforceable contract 2. point out to the creditor available property of the
c. A natural obligation debtor within Philippine Territory, sufficient to cover the
amount of the debt.
Art. 2003.See Article
Art. 2055. See Article, discussed above. Art. 2062. See Article
Art. 2063
Sec. 3 – Effects of Guaranty as between co-guarantors
Compromise defined
Is a contract whereby the parties, by making Art. 2073. See Article
reciprocal concessions, avoid litigation or put an end to one Art. 2074. See Article
already commenced. (Art. 2028) Art. 2075. See Article
1. The pledgor has reasonable grounds to fear the The sale of the thing pledged extinguishes the principal
destruction or impairment of the thing pledged. obligation whether the price of the sale is more or less than
2. There is no fault on the part of the pledges. the amount.
3. The pledgor is offering in place of the thing, another 1. If the price of the sale is more than the amount due
thing in pledge which is of the same kind and quality the creditor, the debtor is not entitled to the excess
as the former. unless the contrary is provided.
4. The pledges does not choose to exercise his right to 2. If the price of the sale is less, neither is the creditor
cause the thing pledged to be sold at public auction. entitled to recover the deficiency a contrary stipulation
is void.
Art. 2108 – See Article in Relation to Article 2112
Art. 2116. See Article
Two remedies available to the pledges in case he is Right of third person to satisfy obligation
deceived as to the substance or quality of the thing As a general rule, the creditor is not found to accept
pledged. payment or performance by a third person who has no
1. To claim another thing in pledged. interest in the fulfillment of the obligation (Art. 1236). Under
2. To demand immediate payment of the principal this Article, a third person who has any right in or to the
obligation thing pledged may pay the debt as soon as it becomes due
The remedies are alternative, that is, he is privileged and demandable and the creditor cannot refuse to accept
to choose only one and not both. payment.
Art. 2110 Art. 2118. See Article (Right of pledgee to collect and receive
Pledge may be extinguished by; amount due on credit pledged)
1. The return of the thing pledged by the pledges to the
pledgor or owner (Art. 2110)
2. The payment of the debt. (Art. 2105) Art. 2119. See Article (Right of pledgee to choose which of
3. The renunciation or abandonment of the pledged (Art. several things pledged shall be sold)
2111)
4. The sale of the thing pledged at public auction (Art.
2115) Art. 2120. See Article
Art. 2121. See Article
Presumption of extinguishments of pledged
The possession of the debtor or owner of the thing pledged Art. 2122. See Article
subsequent to the perfection of the pledge gives rise to a Art. 2123. See Article
prima facie presumption that the thing has been returned
and, therefore, that the pledge has been extinguished. xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Prepared by the CIVIL LAW SECTION Chief NORBERT OBEDOZA Assistant Chief JOHN PAUL MARTIN Members LIWLIWA AGBAYANI,
ELMER PEDROZO, ALLAN ANCHETA, JONATHAN FERNANDEZ, GARY DE GUZMAN, EIGEE GALACGAC and YVALLONE LAMATON.
All Rights Reserved by the SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF LAW BAR OPERATIONS 2003.
CIVIL LAW REVIEWER
10 SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY BAR OPERATIONS
Prepared by the CIVIL LAW SECTION Chief NORBERT OBEDOZA Assistant Chief JOHN PAUL MARTIN Members LIWLIWA AGBAYANI,
ELMER PEDROZO, ALLAN ANCHETA, JONATHAN FERNANDEZ, GARY DE GUZMAN, EIGEE GALACGAC and YVALLONE LAMATON.
All Rights Reserved by the SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF LAW BAR OPERATIONS 2003.
CIVIL LAW REVIEWER
11 SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY BAR OPERATIONS
the power, upon default of the debtor, to foreclose the deficiency may be filed even during the period of
mortgage by an extrajudicial sale of the mortgaged redemption.
property.
3. Prescriptive period of action
c. Public sale after proper notice
The action to recover a deficiency after foreclosure
The sale, which cannot be made legally outside of the
prescribes after ten (10) years from the time the right
province in which the property is situated shall be made at
of action accrues as provided in Art. 1144 (2) of the
public auction after the giving of proper notice which
Civil Code)
consists in the posting of the notice of the sale in at least
three (3) public places at the municipality or city where the
Effect of inadequacy of price in foreclosure sale
property is situated and the publication thereof in a
1. General Rule; exception
newspaper of general circulation in said municipality or city.
Where there is a right to redeem,
d. Payment of cash by highest bidder inadequacy of price is not material because the
Where the highest bidder is the mortgagee judgment debtor may reacquire the property or else
and the amount of his bid represented the sell his right to redeem and thus recover any loss he
total mortgage debt, it is not necessary for claims to have suffered by reason of the price
him to pay cash. It would serve no purpose obtained at the auction sale.
for the sheriff to go through the ceremony of Mere inadequacy of the price obtained at
receiving the money and paying it back to the sheriff’s sale will not be sufficient to set aside the
the creditor. sale unless “the price is so inadequate as to shock the
e. Nature of surplus proceeds from foreclosure conscience of the court” taking into consideration the
sale peculiar circumstances attendant thereto.
Surplus money arising from a sale of real
property like land under foreclosure stands Options in case of death of debtor
in the same place of the land itself with The rule is that a secured creditor holding a real estate
respect to liens thereon or vested right mortgage has three (3) district, independent, and mutually
therein. exclusive remedies in case of death of the debtor.
f. Redemption of property sold
The debtor has the right to redeem the property sold within They are;
the term of one year from and after the date of the sale. 1. to waive the mortgage and claim the entire death from
The reckoning date in cases of registered land is from the the estate of the mortgage as an ordinary claim.
registration of the certificate of sale since it is only from the 2. to foreclose the mortgage judicially and prove any
date that the sale takes effect as a conveyance. In case of deficiency as an ordinary claim, and
juridical persons, they have the right to redeem the 3. to rely on the mortgage exclusively, foreclosing the
property until, but not after the registration of the certificate same at any time before it is barred by prescription
of foreclosure sale which in no case shall be more than without right to file a claim for any deficiency.
three (3) months after foreclosure, which ever is earlier.
g. Remedy of party aggrieved by foreclosure Redemption; defined
The debtor may, the proceedings in which possession was Is a transaction by which the mortgagor requires or
requested, petition that the sale be set aside and the writ of busy back the property which may have passed under the
possession cancelled, because the mortgage was not mortgage or divests the property of the lien which the
violated or the sale was not made in accordance with the mortgage may have created.
provisions thereof. It is allowed in case of foreclosure in favor of banking
and credit institutions and in extrajudicial foreclosures.
Right of mortgage to recover deficiency
1. Mortgage merely security, not a satisfaction of an
obligation Kinds of Redemption:
If there be a balance due to the mortgagee 1. Equity of Redemption
after applying the proceeds of the sale, the mortgagee The right of the mortgagor in case of judicial
is entitled to recover the deficiency. (Development foreclosure to redeem the mortgaged after his default
Bank of the Phils. Vs. Mirang, 55SCRA 141). in the performance of the conditions of the mortgage
In judicial foreclosure, the Rules of Court but before the confirmation of the sale of the
specifically gives the mortgagee the right to claim for mortgaged property.
deficiency in case deficiency exists, while Act. No.
3135 governing extrajudicial foreclosures of mortgage
does not give a mortgagee the right to recover 2. Right of Redemption
deficiency after the public auction sale, neither does it The right of the mortgagor in case of extrajudicial
expressly or implied by prohibit such recovery. foreclosure to redeem the mortgaged property within a
certain period after it was sold for the satisfaction of
2. Action for recovery of deficiency the mortgage debt.
If the deficiency is embodied in a judgment, it is
referred to as deficiency judgment. It is the settled rule
that a mortgagee may recover any deficiency in the Period within which to exercise right
mortgage account which is not realized in a In all cases of extrajudicial sale, the mortgagor may
foreclosure sale and that the action for the recovery of redeem the property at any time within the term of one year
Prepared by the CIVIL LAW SECTION Chief NORBERT OBEDOZA Assistant Chief JOHN PAUL MARTIN Members LIWLIWA AGBAYANI,
ELMER PEDROZO, ALLAN ANCHETA, JONATHAN FERNANDEZ, GARY DE GUZMAN, EIGEE GALACGAC and YVALLONE LAMATON.
All Rights Reserved by the SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF LAW BAR OPERATIONS 2003.
CIVIL LAW REVIEWER
12 SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY BAR OPERATIONS
from and after the date of registration of the certificate of from the date of registration of the sale, up to the time
sale with the appropriate Registry of Deeds. of redemption, and
3. written notice of the redemption must be served on the
Effect of failure to exercise right officer who made the sale and a duplicate filed with
If no redemption is made within the prescribed period, the the proper Register of Deeds.
purchaser has the absolute right to a writ of possession
which is the final process to carry out or consummate the Payment of redemption money
extrajudicial foreclosure. Henceforth, the mortgagor loses The payment of he redemption money “may be made to
his right over the property. the purchaser or redemption, or for him to the officer who
made the sale. “(Sec. 39, Rules of Court). It may be made
Effect of exercise of right to the sheriff. (Reyes vs. De los Santos, 50 SCRA 431).
What actually is effected is not the recovery of the property
which ownership is never lost, but the elimination from his Amount payable
title thereto of the lien created by the levy or attachment or In the redemption of mortgaged property, the rule is that the
judgment or registration of the mortgage thereon. The amount payable is no longer the judgment debt but the
redemption defeats the inchoate right of the purchase and purchase price at the auction sale. Similarly, attorney’s fees
restores the property to the same condition as if no sale awarded by the trial court shall not be added to the
had been made. redemption price because the amount payable is no longer
the judgment but that which is stated in Sec. 30, Rule 39,
Rules of Court.
Where mortgaged property sold to a third party.
A sale by the mortgagor to a third party of the mortgaged
Persons entitled to exercise right of redemption
property during the period for redemption transfers only the
1. Mortgagor or one in privity of title with mortgagor
right to redeem the property and the right to passes, use
2. successor in interest
and enjoy the same during said period. Under Rule 39,
Sec. 31 of the Rules of Court, the judgment debtor remains
Equity of Redemption in judicial foreclosure
in possession of the property foreclosed and sold, during
1. Period for exercise
the period of redemption, but he cannot make a
In a judicial foreclosure of mortgages under Rule 68 of
conveyance of the ownership of the property as said
the Rules of Court, there is no right of redemption
ownership belongs to the purchaser at the foreclosure sale.
after the judicial sale is confirmed. There is only the
(Dizon vs. Gabarro, 83SCRA 688 [1978])
equity of redemption in favor of the mortgagor
consisting in the right to redeem the mortgaged
Where sale not registered and made without consent property within the 90-day period from the order of
of mortgagee. foreclosure, or even thereafter but before confirmation
The buyer was not validly substituted as debtor, and hence, of the sale.
had no right to redeem (Bonnevie vs. CA., 125 SCRA 122
[1983]) 2. Reckoning of the 90-day period
The 90-day period granted the mortgage debtor within
which to pay the amount of the mortgage in Sec. 2,
Where extrajudicial foreclosure effected with fraud Rule 68 of the Rules of Court, is counted “from the
An extrajudicial foreclosure effected with fraud is null and date of the service of such order”. The order referred
void to in the Rule is the order requiring the debtor to pay
the judgment within 90 days.
Nature of mortgagor’s right of redemption
1. An absolute privilege xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
This right of redemption is an absolute privilege, the
exercise of which it entirely dependent upon the will
and discretion of the redemptioner.
2. A mere statutory privilege
It must be exercised in the made and within the period ANTICHRESIS
prescribed by the statute.
3. Involves title to foreclose property Art. 2132
An action to redeem by the mortgage debtor affects Antichresis; defined
his title to the foreclosed property. If the action is Is a contract whereby the creditor acquires the right to
seasonably made, it seeks to erase from the title of receive the fruits of an immovable of his debtor, with the
the judgment or mortgage debtor the lien created by obligation to apply them to the payment of the interest, if
registration of the mortgage and sale. owing, and thereafter to the principal of his credit.
Prepared by the CIVIL LAW SECTION Chief NORBERT OBEDOZA Assistant Chief JOHN PAUL MARTIN Members LIWLIWA AGBAYANI,
ELMER PEDROZO, ALLAN ANCHETA, JONATHAN FERNANDEZ, GARY DE GUZMAN, EIGEE GALACGAC and YVALLONE LAMATON.
All Rights Reserved by the SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF LAW BAR OPERATIONS 2003.
CIVIL LAW REVIEWER
13 SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY BAR OPERATIONS
Prepared by the CIVIL LAW SECTION Chief NORBERT OBEDOZA Assistant Chief JOHN PAUL MARTIN Members LIWLIWA AGBAYANI,
ELMER PEDROZO, ALLAN ANCHETA, JONATHAN FERNANDEZ, GARY DE GUZMAN, EIGEE GALACGAC and YVALLONE LAMATON.
All Rights Reserved by the SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF LAW BAR OPERATIONS 2003.
CIVIL LAW REVIEWER
14 SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY BAR OPERATIONS
Prepared by the CIVIL LAW SECTION Chief NORBERT OBEDOZA Assistant Chief JOHN PAUL MARTIN Members LIWLIWA AGBAYANI,
ELMER PEDROZO, ALLAN ANCHETA, JONATHAN FERNANDEZ, GARY DE GUZMAN, EIGEE GALACGAC and YVALLONE LAMATON.
All Rights Reserved by the SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF LAW BAR OPERATIONS 2003.
CIVIL LAW REVIEWER
15 SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY BAR OPERATIONS
Prepared by the CIVIL LAW SECTION Chief NORBERT OBEDOZA Assistant Chief JOHN PAUL MARTIN Members LIWLIWA AGBAYANI,
ELMER PEDROZO, ALLAN ANCHETA, JONATHAN FERNANDEZ, GARY DE GUZMAN, EIGEE GALACGAC and YVALLONE LAMATON.
All Rights Reserved by the SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF LAW BAR OPERATIONS 2003.