Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
www.elsevier.com/locate/cap
Abstract
Micellar emulsion chemical polymerisation of polyaniline (PANI) using dodecylbenzenesulfonic acid (DBSA) as the micelle and
dopant was performed at 20 °C. It was necessary to use a ratio of 1:1:1 for aniline, oxidant (ammonium persulfate APS) and DBSA
to produce the PANI Æ DBSA in the emeraldine salt (ES) form in large quantities (40 g). The resulting polymer was a nanodispersion
with spherical particles 10 ± 2 nm in diameter and an electrical conductivity of 15 ± 3 S cm1 as determined by transmission electron
microscopy (TEM) and the four-point probe method, respectively. UV–vis spectral characterisation showed the nanodispersion to
be highly doped. Complete deprotonation of the polymer to the emeraldine base form using 0.5 M NaOH was only possible upon
dilution to approximately 0.05% w/v polymer. Reduction of the polymer to leucoemeraldine using phenylhydrazine was relatively
slow; however, oxidation to pernigraniline in 0.25 M APS occurred instantaneously.
Ó 2003 Published by Elsevier B.V.
Table 1
Dispersion polymerisation conditions and characterisation data for the synthesis of PANI Æ DBSA
Reaction conditions Characterisation
Aniline DBSA APS Temp. Time Yield Particle size Conductivity
(mol L1 ) (mol L1 ) (mol L1 ) (°C) (min) (g L1 ) (nm) (S cm1 )
0.65 0.65 0.65 20.0 150 200 10 ± 2 15 ± 3
were added to 100 mL of water in a round bottomed emeraldine form of PANI. When the ratio was increased
flask mixed under mechanical stirring for 1 h. Hundred to 1:1 the formation of dark green emeraldine PA-
milliliter of 1.3 M APS (Aldrich) (equimolar with aniline NI Æ DBSA occurred after 2.5 h, indicating the formation
and DBSA) was then added drop-wise to the milky of the conducting emeraldine salt form of PANI. Ex-
white aniline/DBSA solution. The polymerisation was tended polymerisation times resulted in no improvement
allowed to proceed for 2.5 h, at which time a dark green in the PANI Æ DBSA conductivity. Therefore, the poly-
dispersion was formed. merisation time used for subsequent synthesis was lim-
Purification of the polymerised dispersion was ited to 2.5 h. To obtain the PANI Æ DBSA dispersion
achieved by dialysing against Milli-Q water using a with a high level of doping it was also necessary to use a
12,000 molecular weight cut off dialysis membrane dopant (DBSA) ratio of 1. Dispersion polymerisation of
(Sigma) for 48 h. After dialysis, the dispersion was aniline using DBSA as the dopant and stabiliser was
centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatant performed at 20 °C using APS as the initiator-oxidant.
was retained for residual aniline analysis by HPLC. Reaction conditions and the characterisation data of the
Approximately 100 mL of Milli-Q water was added to PANI Æ DBSA nanodispersion are given in Table 1.
the remaining solid. The water/solid mixture was shaken
to redisperse the solid, followed by centrifuging at 3.2. UV–vis spectroscopy characterisation of PANI
10,000 rpm for 10 min and repeated four times to re- DBSA
move DBSA.
Characterisation using UV–vis spectroscopy (Fig. 1)
2.2. Instrumentation showed the PANI Æ DBSA dispersion (pH < 2) to be in
the conducting emeraldine salt (ES) form. It exhibited
The UV–vis spectrum of the PANI Æ DBSA nanodi- localised polaron bands at 785 and approximately 420
spersion was recorded using a Shimadzou UV-1601 nm and a p–p band at approximately 350 nm (Fig. 1).
UV–vis spectrophotometer. Morphological imaging was The localised nature of the 785 nm polaron band indi-
obtained by transmission electron microscopy (TEM), cates the formation of doped PANI Æ DBSA in the
using a Hitachi H7000 TEM at 75 keV. Conductivity ‘‘compact coil’’ conformation [11]. The p–p band at 350
measurements were performed on pressed pellets of nm and the 420 nm polaron band have overlapped to
the dried nanodispersion using the four-point probe form a flat or distorted single peak indicating a high
method. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) characterisation was level of doping [1].
carried out in a three electrode cell using a glassy carbon
working electrode with a platinum mesh and Ag/AgCl (3
M NaCl) auxiliary and reference electrodes, respectively.
Residual aniline determination was performed by re-
verse phase HPLC using a Waters Bondapak C18 col-
umn and a Linear UVIS 200 UV detector (kmax ¼ 258
nm).
3.1. Polymerisation
dispersions [1,15,16] however the size is much smaller. verse phase HPLC indicated that 0.13 mM of aniline
The size of these nanoparticles may be the reason for the remained in the PANI Æ DBSA nanodispersion. The ob-
unusual reduction behaviour mentioned above. It has served current density increase may be due to poly-
been proposed that the electronic [17] and optical [18] merisation of this latter aniline on successive scans with
properties of nanostructures (< 100 nm) are unique be- the excess DBSA acting as the dopant. However, when a
cause the majority of atoms are at the surface rather solution of 0.13 mM aniline containing DBSA was
than buried in the bulk of the material [6]. polymerised potentiodynamically at a GC electrode, the
Conductivity measurements on three PANI Æ DBSA resulting CV showed no similarity to that shown in Fig.
(ES form) pellets showed the conductivity to be 15 ± 3 4. It is therefore postulated that the increase in current
S cm1 at room temperature. The particle size reported density may be due to coagulation of the PANI Æ DBSA
here is much smaller than that presented by Han et al. nanoparticles at the electrode on successive scans.
[1], who used small angle X-ray spectroscopy to deter-
mined particle size, while the conductivity of our sam-
ples is slightly less than what they reported (24 S cm1 ). 4. Conclusions
References
[1] M.G. Han, S.K. Cho, S.G. Oh, S.S. Im, Synth. Met. 126 (2002)
53–60.
[2] D.Z. Zhou, P.C. Innis, G.G. Wallace, S. Shimizu, S.I. Maeda,
Synth. Met. 114 (2000) 287–293.
[3] D.A. Reece, P.C. Innis, S.F. Ralph, G.G. Wallace, Colloids Surf.,
A––Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 207 (2002) 1–12.
[4] G.G. Wallace, G.M. Spinks, L.A.P. Kane-Maguire, P.R. Teas-
dale, in: Conductive Electroactive Polymers, second ed., CRC
Press, London, 2003, p. 237.
[5] Y.S. Negi, P.V. Adhyapak, J. Macromol. Sci.––Polym. Rev. C 42
(2002) 35–53.
[6] G.G. Wallace, P.C. Innis, J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. (2002) 441–
451.
[7] J.P. Wang, B.S. Zou, X.Y. Hong, D.M. Collard, Synth. Met. 113
(2000) 223–226.
Fig. 4. Cyclic voltammogram of an as-polymerised PANI Æ DBSA dis- [8] H.S. Xia, Q. Wang, J. Nanopart. Res. 3 (2001) 401–411.
persion in the ES form on a GC electrode after dialysis. 1st scan [9] Y. Zhou, H. Itoh, T. Uemura, K. Naka, Y. Chujo, Langmuir 18
originates at 0 mV with a scan rate of 100 mV s1 (arrows show the (2002) 277–283.
direction of the scan); 1 and 5 indicate the scan number. The potentials [10] L.M. Gan, C.H. Chew, H.S.O. Chan, L. Ma, Polym. Bull. 31
are versus Ag/AgCl (3 M NaCl). (1993) 347–350.
406 S.E. Moulton et al. / Current Applied Physics 4 (2004) 402–406
[11] Y. Xia, J.M. Wiesinger, A.G. MacDiarmid, A.J. Epstein, Chem. [17] P. Mulvaney, Langmuir (1996) 788.
Mater. 7 (1995) 443–445. [18] A.N. Shipway, E. Katz, I. Willner, Chem. Phys. Chem. 1 (2000)
[12] K. Takahashi, K. Nakamura, T. Yamaguchi, T. Komura, S. Ito, 18–52.
R. Aizawa, K. Murata, Synth. Met. 128 (2002) 27–33. [19] W.C. Chen, T.C. Wen, A. Gopalan, Synth. Met. 128 (2002) 179–
[13] M. Scully, M.C. Petty, A.P. Monkman, Synth. Met. 55 (1993) 189.
183–187. [20] P.C. Innis, I.D. Norris, L.A.P. Kanemaguire, G.G. Wallace,
[14] A. Abd-Elwahed, R. Holze, Synth. Met. 131 (2002) 61–70. Macromol. 31 (1998) 6521–6528.
[15] D. Chattopadhyay, M. Chakraborty, B.M. Mandal, Polym. Int. [21] V. Aboutanos, J.N. Barisci, P.C. Innis, G.G. Wallace, Col-
50 (2001) 538–544. loids Surf., A––Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 137 (1998) 295–
[16] B.M. Mandal, Bull. Mater. Sci. 21 (1998) 161–165. 300.