ANOVA RESULTS OF LEARNERS’ PERFORMANCE BASED ON THEIR PROFILE

Learner F-value P-Value Alpha value Decision Interpretation

Age 0.509 0.676 0.05 Accept Ho Not significant
Gender 0.104 0.917 0.05 Accept Ho Not significant
Income 0.851 0.515 0.05 Accept Ho Not significant

ANOVA RESULTS OF LEARNERS’ PERFORMANCE BASED ON THEIR PROFILE

Teacher F- value P -value Alpha value Decision Interpretation

Teachers’ Age 2.10 0.082 0.05 Accept Ho Not significant
Teacher’ Civil Status 9.16 0.000 0.05 Reject Ho Significant
Teachers’ Educ. Qualification 19.04 0.000 0.05 Reject Ho Significant
Length of Experience 9.44 0.000 0.05 Reject Ho Significant
Field of Specialization 1.38 0.243 0.05 Reject Ho Significant
Teachers’ Readiness 12.41 0.000 0.05 Accept Ho Not Significant

POST HOC RESULT ON TEACHERS’ CIVIL STATUS ON THE LEARNERS PERFORMANCE

ON MTB- MLE MATHEMATICS 3
CIVIL STATUS MEAN
Single 31.0 b
Married 23.31 a
Widow 18.46 a
Legend: Means with the same superscript did not significantly (P < 0.05) differ

POST HOC RESULT ON TEACHERS’ EDUCATION QUALIFICATION ON THE LEARNERS PERFORMANCE ON MTB- MLE
MATHEMATICS 3
EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATION MEAN
With Units 20.21a
Complete Academic Requirement 23.36b
Bachelors’ Degree 27.81c
Legend: Means with the same superscript did not significantly (P < 0.05) differ
 POST HOC RESULT ON TEACHERS’ LENGTH OF EXPERIENCE ON THE LEARNERS PERFORMANCE
ON MTB- MLE MATHEMATICS 3
Years of Experience Mean
25 above 17.96c
16 – 20 28.08a
11- 15 25.40a
6 – 10 19.49bc
5 below 24.79ab
Legend: Means with the same superscript did not significantly (P < 0.05) differ

POST HOC RESULT ON TEACHERS’ READINESS ON THE IMPLEMENTATION

OF MTB MLE INSTRUCTION IN MATHEMATICS 3
RATING SCALE MEAN
Very Ready 34.23a
Ready 20.97b
Not Ready 23.98b
Very Not Ready 21.92b
Legend: Means with the same superscript did not significantly (P < 0.05) differ

STATISTICAL RESULT OF CORRELATION