Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
html
Date: 06/12/05
It's a safe bet to give historic weight to the reduction of letter and number to single digits, if one wishes to see
the simple, natural patterns of words and of long strings of numbers.
An example of this reduction of letters, is in one case, based upon writing out all of the 26 letters of the modern
alphabet and traditionally assigning a sequential number to each letter, beginning with 1 for the letter A. This is
called Theosophical reduction......namely A=1, B=2, C=3 etc.
Once letters are converted to number, there is no logical reason that any string of numbers cannot be further
reduced to single digits:
Number 9 Only
Numbers 1-8
Whenever this technique is applied to long strings of numbers, it reveals that all number, no matter what the size
of the string, ignoring the placement of the decimal, IS EQUIVALENT (=) to a single number from 1-9 and no
more numbers are needed because 10= 1+0= 1 again, and so on repeating singly, forever.
Notes: So far with number reduced to one digit, there arises eternal patterns in all relationships between
addition and multiplication:
*The series of the First Columns of both Addition and Multiplication are exactly the same. Numbers
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9.
**The Addition of the Second Column has a relationship with Multiplication of the Second Column.
2,4,6,8,1,3,5,7,9 : : 1,4,9,7,7,9,4,1,9
***The Addition of the Third Column has a relative "gap" as does the Multiplication of the Third Column.
3,6,9,3,6,9,3,6,9 : : 1,8,9,1,8,9,1,8,9
From this organization and reduction of all number, we can make certain informed deductions, based upon a
certain premise that:
The basis of all matter is toroidal, therefore all number can be properly mapped upon a toroidal form,
which will then describe the function of all matter.
To demonstrate why this should occur, let's intelligently look at certain parts of our above conclusions to see if
we can tie toroidal forms with number.
* The similarity of the series of numbers in the First Column of the Addition and Multiplication tells me that it is
the basis and common origin of counting systems devised by Man. Universe only understands 0 (zero) and one
0 (zero), however, if we wish to demonstrate any razzle-dazzle, someone had to invent the number 1 as a
counting unit so we can add 1 to 0, so we can begin to count anything. This was a total invention and a
completely artificial move but very necessary to modern mathematics. Previous studies note that all numbers
can be reduced to only 1-9 and can be lined up under the digits 0 and 1, only, as resonant conditions. When you
think of this series, try to imagine resonant conditions between the "real" numbers and 0,1:
0,1
2,3
4,5
6,7
8,9
We can also add another -1 so that the pair (0,1) turns into the triplet (-1,0,1), the yin/yang -/+ with neutral 0 in
the middle:
-1,0,1
2,0,3
4,0,5
6,0,7
8,0,9
** How are we going to interpret the diverse series of numbers of the Second Column of both Addition and
Multiplication?
2,4,6,8,1,3,5,7,9 : : 1,4,9,7,7,9,4,1,9
Let's treat both as ratio. The : : sign means "as is". This means series 2,4,6,8,1,3,5,7,9 is to itself "as is"
1,4,9,7,7,9,1,4,9 but I see a pattern within each one, so let's split both up like they should be split, by moving the
9(0) to the center:
2,4,6,8.........9(0).......1,3,5,7
OR
1,4,9,7..........9(0).......7,9,1,4
The split makes it obvious that the reality of so-called "Real" Numbers has two sides to be considered. A
"center" must also be considered. One side seems to have 4 of something and the other side also has 4 of
something with a extra 9 center for each side. We can see this asymmetry is just like B. Fullers "bowtie 9". This
bowtie can be plotted around the surface of the torus. Just imagine one mobius loop making one circuit. These
juxtaposed numbers may be equal and cancel or they may be ambidextrous, inverted, reciprocal,
complimentary, unequal partners. Only the intelligent will know the details, which I have collected on this site,
herein.
*** The 3,6,9 "gap" of previous study, tells me that the 9 is 0-center of certain enneagram number systems and
the 3 and 6 are oscillations just as B. Fullers 9(0) center is the center of the oscillating +/- 1 to 4. We also
discover here that the triplet 3,6,9 has a triplet partner 1,8,9 which also acts like B. Fuller's system, and by
intuition, works inverse from 3,6,9, both upon the surface of the torus. We might go further and say that
whenever you see the single digit 1,3,6,8 or 9(0), you may conclude that you are seeing a (9) center with two pair
of forces juxtaposed against each other:
1 against 3, 6 against 8
1 against 6, 3 against 8
1 against 8, 3 against 6
etc.
In how many combinations?
So, if we want to abandon our simple number 288 and complicate our formulae by squaring 288 to equal 82944
and then square that (82944^2 = 6879707136), we should then square all of the other numbers along with
82944^2, then we will maintain all of the formulae and relationships. We can also apply Theosophical reduction
to all these long numbers and formulae and reduce all of it to one-digit numbers.
If 82944 is valid, in the first complicated Iuliano formulae, then the reduction of 82944 to 9, a simple single-digit
formulae, is also valid. Likewise, if Morton's formulae is reduced to single digits, it is also valid, although one
cannot easily understand what 9 / 4 = 8 means, by way of a multiplication.
Although these simple insights may seem like child's play to others, more advanced, I would choose to take
complicated maths and reduce them to simplicity.
Theosophical Reduction and Jerr y Iuliano's
Complicated Maths on the A ngular Measuring System: Degr ees / Radian
MP:
From the unification equation, uniting two angular measuring systems..DEGREES...Sumerian ( 360 )..and
RADIAN...1/2 Sumerian divided by Pi..180 / Pi = 57.29577951..Ê cosine = cos ...radians and COSINE =
COS...degrees:
J.Iuliano
From: Jerryiuliano@aol.com
To: rgrace@rgrace.org
Subject: Angular Measuring System: Degrees / Radian Link
Date: 03/23/04
MP:
From the unification equation, uniting two angular measuring systems..DEGREES...Sumerian ( 9 )..and
RADIAN...1/2 Sumerian divided by Pi.......9 / Pi = 3..Ê cosine = cos ...radians and COSINE = COS...degrees:
Letting fine-structure constant = 1/1 = aem
...then it can be demonstrated: i = sqrt( - 1 )
(( cos 1 ) ^ ( COS 1 )) / 1 = i ^ i = 1 / sqrt ( e^Pi )
...solving for exponential x using master harmonic 9 in this form:
9 ^ x = COS 1...degrees
...leads to the following reduction:
9 ^ -.3 = COS 1...degrees
...which decays (natural log e ) to the electron in million electron volts:
(( e ^ ( e ^ ( e ^ -.3 ))) / 1 ) / cos 1 = 1/ ( emev ^ 2 )
...where emev = .5 mev....( 2002 NIST = .5 mev )
The master harmonic 9 is equivalent through the electron form:
((( e ^ ( e ^ ( e ^ -.3 ))) * 1 * 4 ) ^ ( emev ^ ( - 1/Pi )) = 9
...where emev = exact 2002 NIST value = .5... mev
J.Iuliano
SOLAR APEX Grid LAT .. 53 (deg) X 26 (min) X 27.00111177 (sec) North of ecliptic .. = 37207.53202 North of
ecliptic.
SOLAR APEX Grid LONG .. 173 (deg) X 13 (min) X 47.02552383 (sec) W.ALNITAK .. = 105760.4031 W.ALNITAK.
SOLAR APEX Grid LAT .. 8 (deg) X 8 (min) X 9 (sec) North of ecliptic .. = 4 North of ecliptic.
SOLAR APEX Grid LONG .. 2 (deg) X 4 (min) X 3 (sec) W.ALNITAK .. = 9 W.ALNITAK.
Courtesy of M.Rodin
In this counterwound coil there is a 3,6,9 series but the series goes like this:
3,3,9,6,6,9,3,3,9,6,6,9
The author of this winding scheme, doubles each oscillating 3 and 6. Is this Reality and necessary or an error?
Notice that each 9 is surrounded by eight other numbers. Each two of these numbers directly across the 9, from
each other, all add to 9. Because of the repeated 3,3's and 6,6's the numbers surrounding these repeats, do not
add to 9, yet the straight, radial lines go right through other 3,6 and 9's making up every spiral. Are these spirals,
"the prime spirals"?
Courtesy of M.Rodin
This radial/spiral view, also has the 3,6,9 series but the series, again, goes like this:
3,3,9,6,6,9,3,3,9,6,6,9
However in previous study we found that, after Theosophical Reduction of numbers to single digits, any single
number that is 3,6 or 9 is not a prime. If any single digit is 1,2,4,5,7 or 8, it is a prime. (P.Plictha) Since these are
3,6 or 9, they must not be primes.
Courtesy of P.Plictha
The rationale for this is rooted in Peter Plictha's Prime Number Cross. If we reduce any number to a single digit
we find what Plictha found. That is: 6 and all multiples of 6 cannot be primes because all number on each side
of 6 and multiples of 6 are the primes. We can also note that 6's and all multiples of 6, always reduces to 3,6 or
9 so any 3,6 or 9 is never prime. For example:
6=6
12=3
18=9
24=6
30=3
36=9
In this file, "Analysis of Maths by Theosophical Reduction" we discovered that the center "gap" series was
3,6,9,3,6,9 (Assume no primes) with a partner "gap" series 1,8,9,1,8,9 (Assume primes)
In this file we also discovered that each series to each "side" of the center 9(0) was:
2,4,6,8.........9(0).......1,3,5,7
OR
1,4,9,7..........9(0).......7,9,1,4
"1,2,4,8,7,5... and another doubling sequence going in the opposite direction 5,7,8,4,2,1...."
Courtesy of L.Di-Martino
There are certain Ancient Greek scales that are 6 double octave sets surrounding a center, 7th double set called
the Dorian/Dorian center pair, or in total, 13 double sets, which demonstrates sets against sets in a
complimentary manner of pairings. One-half of each set of octaves also seemed to "travel" backward.
Courtesy of L.Di-Martino
In the Mayan Tzolkin, one of the main characteristics of its numberings, is that the very last kua (number) is a
complimentary partner of the very first kua (number). This complimenting holds for every other numbered pair
of the entire 260 kua. One-complimentary-half of each set of kua also seems to "travel" backward. No matter
what direction the kua seem to "move", they are always in pairs. This is the Template of Light.
8x8 I-Ching as Magic Square of B.Franklin
In the Chinese I-Ching, there are also 32 of 64 numbers that are also perfectly positioned so as to be
complimentary to its other perfectly positioned partners, directly across the center. One-complimentary-half of
each set of numbers also seemed to "travel" backward. One-complimentary-half of life, which is governed by the
I-Ching, also seems to be "traveling" backward. One-complimentary-half of DNA, which is governed by this I-
Ching, also seems to be "traveling" backward. No matter what direction the kua seem to "move", they are always
in pairs and also always add to 260. This is the Template of Life.
Double Sepiroth
Robert
As you are aware, the number 9 possesses mathematical properties galore, I am uncertain whether this snippet
will be of assist, nevertheless here it is
Your number sequence: 111(3), 248(5), 399(3), 471(3), 578(2), 699(6), 741(3), 818(8), 999(9) adds to: 5064(6) if
we deduct 3024(9) {Great Pyramid} from 5064(6) we obtain 2040(6) and this x 0.9 = 1836(9) the roofline length
{sloping} of the Grand Gallery
The number Addition sequence you illustrate for the Second Column being:
1, 4, 9, 7, 7, 9, 4, 1, 9
Then: 246(3) + 813(3) + 579(3) = 1638(9) a rearranged 1836(9) therefore 1836(9) minus 1638(9) = 198(9) and
this x 15.272727(6) = 3024(9) the 15.272727(6) x 33(6) = 504(9) Plato's Magnesia number, likewise your
Multiplication in the Third Column shows: 1, 8, 9, 1, 8, 9, 1, 8, 9
Likewise: 149(5) + 779(5) + 419(5) = 1347(6) this equates as: 13(4) + 47(2) = 60(6) this deducted from the
5064(6) = 5004(9) which is the product of your series: 123(6), 246(3), 369(9), 483(6), 516(3), 639(9), 753(6),
876(3), 999(9).
Then the penultimate number 818(8) divided by the first number 111(3) = 7.369(9)369(9) there is the 3, 6, 9
sequence
The 7.369(9)369(9) x 999(9) = 7362(9) this minus 3024(9) minus 1836(9) minus 504(9) = 1998(9) {3 x 666(9)}
It simply endures perpetually Robert, therefore I shall finish at this point
Derek Skhane
Reflective Math
________________________________
Robert
The following may assist regarding the ongoing "What's needed to make this work?"
Mathematical Model
Number is the overriding connective influence to every field of research whether it is geodesy, astronomy,
metrology or a host of other types. Let us observe what ensues commencing with the fundamentals, heeding
the fact that the number 9 {nine} is the fundamental of all number
The objective in the following exercise is to add the three numbers together then deduct them from the object
number, for example 111(3) adds up to 3 and 111(3) minus 3 = 108(9), then 1 + 0 + 8 = 9
111(3) minus 3 = 108(9) {1 + 0 + 8 = 9} the 108(9)9(9) + 108(9)0(9) = 216(9)9
333(9) minus 9 = 324(9) {3 + 2 + 4 = 9} the 3249(9) + 108(9)0 = 432(9)9(9) etc, etc. Note the downward
emergence of 234.123(6) in the right hand column likewise the 642(3) and the 999(9) given that 999(9) minus
642(3) = 357(6) and this minus 123(6) = 234(9)
Alternatively
888(6) minus 24 = 864(9) {8 + 6 + 4 = 18} the 864(9) is the 7th term of PWS {Plato's World Series}
999(9) minus 27 = 972(9) {9 + 7 + 2 = 18} the 972(9) is the 8th term of PWS {Plato's World Series}
Whilst the three digit numbers are increased to four digits, following the same modus operandi multiples of 9
will forever arise for example
Likewise again note the two downward patterns of 123(6)456789 {there are supplementary patterns within}
If we utilize the 999(9) product 864(9), employing the same methodology the following occurs
864(9) minus 18 = 846(9) minus 18 = 828(9) minus 18 = 810(9) minus 9 = 801(9) minus 9 = 792(9) minus 18 =
774(9) minus 18 = 756(9) {Great Pyramid} etcetera, plus the following obviously ensues
111(3) + 222(6) + 333(9) + 444(3) + 555(6) + 666(9) + 777(3) + 888(6) + 999(9) = 4995(9) then reverse the
4995 to 5994(9) then add both to produce 10989(9) which minus 4374(9) = 6615(9) which minus 54 = 6561(9)
This occurs via: 10989(9) minus 9963(9) = 1026(9) which + 3348(9) = 4374(9), the 3348(9) minus 18 = 333(9)0
which is obviously 30 x 111(3)
Derek Skhane
Reflective Math
________________________________
Robert
Continuing on, your number sequence: 246(3)813(3)579(3) add to this 123(6)456789 to obtain:
370(1)270(9)368(9) {this plus 100002(3) = 370(1)370(1)370(1)(3)}
Alternatively: 370(1) + 270(9) + 368(8) = 1008(9) {twice 504(9)} a pair of amicable numbers acknowledged by
the Pythagoreans being 284(5) and 220(4) hence: 284(5) + 220(4) = 504(9), the proper divisors of 220(4) are 1,
2 , 4, 5, 10, 11, 20, 22, 44, 55 and 110 they add up to 284(5). The proper divisors of 284(5) are: 1, 2, 4, 71 and 142
they add to 220(4)
Therefore we utilize them as 1091(2), the numbers 8712(9) and 9801(9) are the only four-digit numbers that are
integral multiples of their reversals {G.H.Hardy: Mathematicians Apology}
108(9)9
2178(9)
3267(9)
4356(9)
5445(9)
6534(9)
7623(9)
8712(9)
9801(9)
Then 1091(2) minus 108(9)9 = 2 deduct 2 from the above 0178(7) to obtain 176(5)
To regain the previous email total of 5064(6), then: 1091(2) + 1901(2) = 2992(4) from this deduct your 111(3)
then your 818(8) to obtain: 2063(2) + 3001(4) = 5064(6)
At commencement I stated: Continuing on, your number sequence: 246(3)813(3)579(3) add to this
123(6)456789 to obtain: 370(1)270(9)368(8)
Then: 370(1)270(9)368(8) plus 100002 = 370(1)370(1)370(1)(3), the 100002 plus 999(9)9 = 110001(3) +
111(3)0 = 111(3)111(3)
Then: 370(1)370(1)370(1)(3) minus your number sequence: 369(9)369(9)369(9) = 1001001(3) that plus
110110(4) = 111(3)111(3)1
The Great Pyramid unit of 432(9)432(9) {756(9) x 572} divided by the above 110110(4) = 3.9272727(3) that x
220(4) = 864(9) or 3.9272727(3) x 660(3) = 2592(9) etc, etc
Likewise the 370(1)370(1)370(1)(3) minus your 189189189(9) = 181181181(3) which is 181(1) x 1001001(3)
{above} seeing as a rearranged Grand Gallery unit {1881(9)} is within the 181181181(3), the following is worth a
mention
All cyclic numbers are the periods in the repeating decimals of the reciprocals of certain prime numbers, the
reciprocal of 1/7 is the repeating decimal 142857(9) {note there are 6 repeating numbers not 7}.
Now one divided by seven produces: 0.142857(9)142857(9) and this x 1267(7) = 181 {above} the 1267(7) the
12 + 67 = 79 + 97 = 176(5)
Alternatively: 1267(7) minus 111(3)1 = 156 this is half of the Maya Third Sun {312} likewise 156 x
3.666(9)666(9)6 = 572 the capstone, likewise 156 x 876(3)0 = 1366560 the Maya "super" number. The 876(3)0
minus your total of 5064(6) = 369(9)6 that minus your 369(9)3 = 3
The next larger prime that generates such a number as discussed above is 17 {17 x 108(9) = 1836(9) the Grand
Gallery} likewise the addition of one through to seventeen obtains 153(9) and 153(9) x 12 = 1836(9). Therefore
one divided by seventeen = 0.0588(3)235(1)294(6)117(9)6(5)47, {note there are 16 repeating numbers not 17}
Then: 588(3) + 235(1) + 294(6) + 117(9) + 647 = 1881 the Grand Gallery unit
Likewise within the digits, clearly seen is 882, 294(6), 117(9)6(5) and 176(5)4 all full of symbolism in this
instance we utilize 117(9)6(5) {Only/begotten Son} {117(9)6(5) is 1.333(9)3(3)33 x 882 = City of God, and
117(9)6(5) is 4 x 294(6) = Church}
I trust this is of a little assist, as the combinations within Robert, are literally numerous
Derek Skhane
Reflective Math
Conclusions
By Theosophical Reduction most numbers reduce to 3's and 9's with 9's leading. The arbitrary numbering
schemes of logic, applied to number and toroids, is often different between one author and another. However it
is certain that there is a neutral oscillation (+/0/-) between two opposite directions of information flow.
Theosophical Reduction removes the arbitrary number schemes so that proper, Theosophically reduced, single-
digit number schemes can be applied to the toroid, for the desired results.