Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Abstract
The transfer of heat to and from process fluids is an essential part of most of the chemical processes. Therefore, heat exchangers
(HEs) are used extensively and regularly in process and allied industries and are very important during design and operation. The
most commonly used type of HE is the shell and tube heat exchanger. In the present study, a comparative analysis of a water to water
STHE wherein, hot water flows inside the tubes and cold water inside the shell is made, to study and analyze the heat transfer
coefficient and pressure drops for different mass flow rates and inlet and outlet temperatures, using Kern, Bell and Bell Delaware
methods. This paper purely aims at studying and comparing different methods of STHE and bringing out which method is better for
adopting in shell side calculations.
Keywords: STHE, Heat transfer coefficient, shell &Tube heat exchanger, Pressure Drop, TEMA, Bell Delaware method,
Kern Method & Bell method.
---------------------------------------------------------------------***---------------------------------------------------------------------
sections existing between the segmental baffles. This modified form to that given byBell (1963), is outlined below.
necessitates the use of different equations to calculate the The method is not recommended when the by-pass flow area is
pressure drop in the window sections to those used in the cross greater than 30% of the cross-flow area, unless sealing strips are
flow sections. The spacing between the tube plates and the first used[5].
and the last baffle, which is mostly dictated by the diameter of
the inlet and oulet nozzles, differs in many cases from the Bell (1978) has proposed a graphical method based on the
spacing between two adjacent baffles and some of the operating lines in stagewise process design, to estimate the
aforementioned streams are not present in the first and in the last value of N. This procedure utilizes the inlet and outlet
heat exchanger sections. This adds to the complexity of the temperatures of both hot and cold streams in which N is about 3.
problem [5]. In this work, it has been found that for N > 3, Bell’s method
frequently cannot be used to predict feasible designs of
In designing shell and tube heat exchangers, to calculate the heat multipass exchangers. Specifically, by following the procedure
exchange area, different methods were proposed such as Kern used in the development of the Kremser equation in stagewise
Method, Bell, Bell Delaware etc [6]. process design (McCabe and Smith, 1976)[5]
The present paper employs all the three methods mentioned 4. BELL DELAWARE METHOD
above to study and analyze various parameters of a shell and
tube heat exchanger and compare the results to identify which Shell side flow is complex, combines crossflow and baffle
method gives the best result. Window flow, as well as baffle-shell and bundle-shell bypass
streams and other complex flow patterns
2. KERN METHOD
In a baffled shell and tube heat exchanger, only a fraction of the
The kern method was based on experimental work on fluid flow through the shell side of a heat exchanger actually
commercial exchangers with standard tolerances and will give a flows across the tube bundle in the idealized path normal to the
reasonably satisfactory prediction of the heat-transfer coefficient axis of the tubes. The remaining fraction of the fluid flows
for standard designs. The prediction of pressure drop is less through bypass areas. The fluid seeks the flow path of less
satisfactory, as pressure drop is more affected by leakage and resistance from the inlet to the outlet of the exchanger.
bypassing than heat transfer. The shell-side heat transfer and
friction factors are correlated in a similar manner to those for In the Bell Delaware method, the fluid flow in the shell is
tube-side flow by using a hypothetical shell velocity and shell divided into a number of individual streams A through F as
diameter. As the cross-sectional area for flow will vary across shown in FIG 1.
the shell diameter, the linear and mass velocities are based on
the maximum area for cross-flow: that at the shell equator. The
shell equivalent diameter is calculated using the flow area
between the tubes taken in the axial direction (parallel to the
tubes) and the wetted perimeter of the tubes. The method used
by D.Q. Kern is simple and more explanative. All the parameter
related to heat exchanger are obtained in well manner and brief
without any complication as compared to other method, the
calculation process is quite and simple detailed.
3. BELL METHOD
In Bell’s method the heat-transfer coefficient and pressure drop
are estimated from correlations for flow over ideal tube-banks,
and the effects of leakage, bypassing and flow in the window
zone are allowed for by applying correction factors. This
approach will give more satisfactory predictions of the heat- Fig- 1 cross section of shell and tube heat exchanger
transfer coefficient and pressure drop than Kern’s method; and,
as it takes into account the effects of leakage and bypassing, can Each of the streams from A to F introduces a correction factor to
be used to investigate the effects of constructional tolerances the heat transfer correlation for ideal cross-flow across a bank of
and the use of sealing strips. The procedure in a simplified and tubes such as Jc, JL, Jb , Js, Jr .
__________________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 03 Special Issue: 03 | May-2014 | NCRIET-2014, Available @ http://www.ijret.org 487
IJRET: International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology eISSN: 2319-1163 | pISSN: 2321-7308
In the present study, efforts have been made to study Kern, Bell 6. NOMENCLATURES
& Bell Delaware method and apply these methods in calculating
heat transfer coeffient, Reynold’s number, pressure drops, Sm = Area of the shell side cross flow section (m2).
overall heat transfer coefficient etc for a heat exchanger which Pt = Tube pitch (m).
has been designed and fabricated for our experimental Do = Tube outside diameter (m).
investigations and compare the results and identify which
Di = Tube inside diameter (m).
method is more efficient in calculating the shell side parameters.
The heat transfer fluid used is water. Hot water flows inside the Ds = Shell inside diameter (m).
tubes and cold water flows inside shell. Lb = Baffle spacing (m)
Ls= Length of shell (m).
4.1 Fluid Properties Considered Lt = Length of tube (m).
Shell side fluid properties: tb = Tube thickness (m).
ρs = 1000 kg/m3 Gs= Shell side mass velocity (kg/ m2-s).
μs = 0.00088 N-s/ m2 Gt = Tube side mass velocity (kg/ m2-s).
Cps = 4.187kJ/kg’K Us= Shell side linear velocity (m/s).
Ks = 0.00098 kJ/s-m’K. Ut = Tube side linear velocity (m/s).
ms= Mass flow rate of the fluid on shell side (kg/s).
Tube side fluid properties:
mt= Mass flow rate of the fluid on tube side (kg/s).
ρt = 1000 kg/m3
ρs = Shell side fluid density (kg/m3).
μt= 0.00086 N-s/ m2
ρt = Tube side fluid density (kg/m3).
Cpt = 4.187kJ/kg’K
Res= Shell side Reynolds number.
Kt = 0.00098 kJ/s-m’K.
Ret = Tube side Reynolds number.
Prs= Shell side Prandtl number.
5. HEAT EXCHANGER SPECIFICATIONS:
Prt = Tube side Prandtl number
In the present study, a stainless steel shell and tube heat
μs = Shell side fluid Viscosity (N-s/ m2).
exchanger is used to study the various parameters of the heat
exchanger such as heat transfer coefficient, Reynolds’s number, μt = Tube side fluid viscosity (N-s/ m2).
pressure drop, Overall heat transfer coefficient etc using water μw = Viscosity a wall temperature (N-s/ m2).
as a heat transfer medium. Cps = Shell side fluid heat capacity (kJ/kg’K).
Cpt = Tube side fluid heat capacity (kJ/kg’K).
Specifications of the heat exchanger are as follows:
Ks = Shell side fluid thermal conductivity (kJ/s-m’K).
Shell diameter (Ds) 0.2m Kt = Tube side fluid thermal conductivity (kJ/s-m’K).
Tube inside diameter (Di) 0.016m ho= Shell side heat transfer coefficient (W/ m2’K).
Tube outside diameter (Do) 0.01924m hi = Shell side ideal heat transfer coefficient (W/ m2’K).
Pitch (Pt) 0.03m Nb= Number of baffles.
Length of shell (Ls) 0.8m Nt = Number of tubes.
Length of tube (Lt) 0.825m f = Friction factor.
Length of baffle (Lb) 0.2m ΔPs= Shell side pressure drop (Pa).
Number of baffles (Nb) 4 np = Number of tube passes.
Number of tubes (Nt) 18
C = Clearance between tubes.
Number of shell passes (ns) 1
Number of tube passes (nt) 2 Δb = Bundle to shell diametrical clearance.
Clearance (C) 0.01076m Δsb=Shell to baffle diametrical clearance.
Bundle to shell diametrical clearance (Δb) 0.028m Δtb=Tube to bundle diametrical clearance.
Shell to baffle diametrical clearance (Δsb) 0.0254m Nss/Nc=Sealing strips per cross flow row.
Tube to baffle diametrical clearance (Δtb) 0.0005m Dotl=Ds - Δb
Ө = {Ds-(2*Lc)}/ Dotl
Fc=Fraction of total number of tubes in a crossflow section.
Jc=Correction factor for baffle cut and spacing.
Ssb=Shell to baffle leakage area (m2).
__________________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 03 Special Issue: 03 | May-2014 | NCRIET-2014, Available @ http://www.ijret.org 488
IJRET: International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology eISSN: 2319-1163 | pISSN: 2321-7308
Stb=Tube to baffle leakage area (m2). Calculate the shell –side mass velocity
Fbp = Fraction of the crossflow area available for bypass flow. Gs = Ms/ As
= 0.0354/0.01432
Sw= Window flow area (m2). =2.46 Kg/m2 Sec
Nc = Number of tube rows crossed in one crossflow section.
Ncw=Effective number crossflow rows in window zone. Calculate the Reynolds number on shell side
ΔPc=Ideal cross flow pressure drop through one baffle space Res = Gs do/ μ
(Pa). = (2.46*0.01924)/(0.008)
=53.7645
ΔPw= Window zone pressure drop (Pa).
RL= correction factor for baffle leakage effect on pressure drop Calculate the Prandtl number
Rb= correction factor on pressure drop for bypass flow. Pr = Cp μ / K
=(4.187*0.00088)/(0.00098)
Experimental study is done on the shell and tube water / water = 3.76
heat exchanger and various parameters are calculated for
different mass flow rates and at varying inlet and outlet Ideal heat transfer co-efficient is given by
temperatures. Calculations shown below are made using Kern,
Bell and Bell Delaware methods for a mass flow rate of hoc* do/ K = Jh Re Pr1/3 (μ/ μw) 0.14
.0354Kg/s and further readings are shown for different flow
rates and comparison graphs are drawn. (hoc*0.01924)/(0.00098)=1*53.97*(3.76 1/3)*1
Using Kern Method: Now Jh is calculated, from the fig (2) at Reynolds no
As = {(Pt – Do)*D*Lb} /Pt Jh=1
= {(0.03-0.01924)*0.2*.2}/(0.03)
= 0.01435 m2 Fn tube row correction factor
Tube vertical pitch, P't = 0.87 x PT (for triangular pitch)
Gs = ms / As = 0.87*0.03
= 0.0354/0.01435 =0.026
= 2.47 Kg/m2 sec
Baffle cut height, Hc = Ds x Bc
De = [4*{(Pt2*√3)/4} 2
– {(π* Do )/8}] / [(π*Do)/2] =0.2*0.25
=[4{(0.03 *√3/4}{(π*0.019242)/8]/[(π*0.0924)/2]
2 =0.05
= 0.0325m
Height between Baffle tips = Ds – 2 x (Hc)
Res = (Gs* De) / μs = 0.2-(2*0.05)
= (2.47/0.0325)/0.00088 = 0.1
= 91.2
Ncv = HbT/ P't
Prs = (Cps*μs) / Ks =0.1/0.026
= (4.187*0.00088)/0.00098 =3.8
= 3.76
Now from the figure (3) at Ncv, we get Fn, i.e, (tube row
hs = 0.36*( Ks / De)* (Re^0.55)*( Pr^0.33)*{ (μs / μw)^0.14} correction factor)
=0.35*(0.00098/0.0325)*(91.2 0.55)*(3.760.33)*1 Fn=1
Ө = 0.581 rad STEP 15: Calculate the correction factor for bundle bypassing
effects due to the clearance between the outermost tubes and the
Fc =(1 /π)*[π +(2*Ө) *sin{cos-1(Ө)}-{2* cos-1(Ө)}] shell and pass dividers Jb.
Fc=(1 /π)*[π +(2*.581) *sin{cos-1(.581)}-{2*cos-1(.581)}]
Fc =0.695 The value of Jb can be obtained from the fig 2.35 of wolverine
tube heat transfer data book Page No. 109 for the corresponding
Here Lc = 0.25* .2 = 0.05 for 25% baffle cut. value of Fbp.
STEP 9: Calculate the correction factor for baffle cut and Jb = 0.96
spacing Jc.
STEP 16: The correction factors Js and Jr are equal to 1 for
The value of Jc can be obtained from the fig 2.33 of wolverine Res>=100. But for Res<100, Jr can be obtained from Fig. 2.37 of
tube heat transfer data book Page No. 107 for the corresponding wolverine tube heat transfer data book Page No. 111.
value of Fc.
Jr = 0.88
Jc = 1.05
STEP 17: Calculate the shell side heat transfer coefficient for
STEP 10: Calculate shell to baffle leakage area for one baffle the exchanger ho.
Ssb.
Ssb = Ds*(Δsb / 2)*[π - cos-1(Ө)] ho = hi *Jc*JL*Jb*Js *Jr
Ssb = .2*(.0254 / 2)*[π - cos-1(.581)] ho = 0.3559 *1.05*0.89*0.96
Ssb = 0.00556 m2
ho = 0.32 W/ m2’K
STEP 11: Calculate tube to baffle leakage area for one baffle
Stb. Calculation Of Shell Side Pressure Drop Using Kern
Stb = (π*Do)*(Δtb / 2)*Nt*[(1 +Fc)/ 2] Method:
Stb = (π*.01924)*(.0005 / 2)*18*[(1 +.695)/ 2] Nb = {Ls / (Lb + tb)} – 1
Stb = 0.0002305 m2 = {0.800/(0.2+0.00162)}-1
STEP 12: Calculate Nb+1= 3.96
(Ssb + Stb) / Sm f = exp {0.576 – (0.19*Ln Res)}
= exp {0.567-(0.19*Ln*91.2)}
(.00556 + 0.0002305) / .017 = 0.754
(Ssb + Stb) / Sm = 0.349
& ΔPs = [f* Gs2* Ds*( Nb+1)] / [2* ρs* De*{(μs / μw)^0.14}]
=[0.754*(2.472)*0.2*3.96]/ [2*1000*0.0325*1]
Ssb / (Ssb + Stb) ΔPs = 0.056Pa
0.00556 / (0.00556+0.0002305)
Ssb / (Ssb + Stb) = 0.9601
6.4 Calculation of Shell Side Pressure Drop Using Bell
STEP 13: Calculate the correction factor for baffle leakage Method:
effects JL.
Cross flow zones
The value of JL can be obtained from the fig 2.34 of wolverine ΔPc = ΔPi F 'b F 'L
tube heat transfer data book Page No. 108 for the corresponding Ideal tube Pr drop (ΔPi)
value obtained in step 12 above.
(ΔPi) = 8Jf Ncv ρus2 / 2 (μ/ μw) -0.14
JL = 0.89 =8x7.5x3.38x1000x0.0024622 /2x1
=0.6136
STEP 14: Calculate the fraction of the crossflow area available
for bypass flow Fbp. Res = ρus do/ μ
Fbp = (Lb / Sm)*(Ds - Dotl) =1000x0.00246x0.01924/0.00088
Fbp = (.2 / .017)*(.2- .172) =53.78
Fbp = 0.3383
F 'b bypass correction factor for Pr drop.
F 'b = exp [-αAb/ As (1 – {2Ns / Ncc }1/3)]
__________________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 03 Special Issue: 03 | May-2014 | NCRIET-2014, Available @ http://www.ijret.org 491
IJRET: International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology eISSN: 2319-1163 | pISSN: 2321-7308
Total shell –side pressure drop The value of RL can be obtained from the fig 2.38 of wolverine
ΔPs = 2ΔPe + ΔPc( Nb – 1) + Nb ΔPw tube heat transfer data book for the corresponding value
=2x0.03254+0.00736(4-1)+4x0.005116 obtained in step 12 above.
using Gnielinski Correlation: Nut = {(f /2)*(Ret -1000)* Prt} / {1+(12.7*√ (f /2)*(Prt ^ (2/3))-
2
At = {(π* Di ) / 4}*(Nt / 2) 1)}
= {(π*0.0162)/4}*(18/2) ={(0.0304/2)*(300.83-1000)*3.67]/{1+(12.7*√
= 0.00180 m2 (0.0304/2)*(3.672/3- 1)}
=-12.4
Gt = mt / At
= 0.0291/0.00180 hi = (Nut * Kt) / Di
= 16.17 Kg/m sec = (-12.4*0.00098)/0.016
Ut = Gt / ρt hi = -0.78 W/m2 0K
= 16.17/1000
= 0.01617 m/sec 6.7 Calculation of Tube Side Pressure Drop:
ΔPt = [{(4* f* Lt* np) / Di} + (4* np)]*[(ρt*Ut2) / 2]
Res = (Gt* Di) / μt
=[{(4*0.0304*0.825*2)/0.016}+(4*2)]*[(1000*0.016172)/2]
= (16.17*0.016)/0.00086
= 2.685Pa
=300.83
.008782) / 2]
Prt = (Cpt*μt) / Kt
ΔPt =2.685Pa
= (4.187*0.00086)/0.00098
= 3.67
7. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
f = {(1.58*Ln Ret) – 3.28} ^ (-2) Shell side results for four sample readings are shown below
= {(1.58*Ln 300.83)-3.28}^(-2)
13 Pressure drop (Pa Bell Delaware method)) 0.169 0.215 0.278 0.343
__________________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 03 Special Issue: 03 | May-2014 | NCRIET-2014, Available @ http://www.ijret.org 493
IJRET: International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology eISSN: 2319-1163 | pISSN: 2321-7308
Tube side results for four sample readings are shown below
8. GRAPHS
__________________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 03 Special Issue: 03 | May-2014 | NCRIET-2014, Available @ http://www.ijret.org 494
IJRET: International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology eISSN: 2319-1163 | pISSN: 2321-7308
REFERENCES
[1]. Jian-Fei Zhang, Ya-Ling He, Wen-Quan Tao1, A Design
and Rating Method for Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchangers With
Helical Baffles, School of Power and Energy Engineering,
Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China
[2]. Ebieto, CE and Eke G B, “Performance Analysis of Shell
and Tube Heat Exchangers: A case study” Department of
Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of
Port Harcourt, Port Harcourt, Nigeria. Journal of Emerging
trends in engineering and applied sciences (JETEAS) 3(5):899-
903.
[3]. Sandeep K. Patel, Professor Alkesh M. Mavani “Shell &
tube heat exchanger thermal design With optimization of mass
Fig e. Variation of Heat Transfer Coefficient w.r.t Flow rate on flow rate and baffle spacing” International Journal of
the Tube side Advanced engineering Research and Studies IJAERS/Vol.II/
Issue I/Oct.-Dec.,2012/130-135
[4]. Mauro A. S. S. Ravagnani1, Aline P. Silva1 and Jose A.
Caballero2 “Optimal Shell and Tube Heat Exchangers Design”
State University Of Maringa1, University Of Alicante2, Brazil1,
Spain2.
[5]. Edward S. Gaddis a,*, Volker Gnielinski b “Pressure
drop on the shell side of shell-and-tube heat exchangers with
segmental baffles1” Institute fir Thermische Verfuhrenstechnik,
Technische UniversitZit ClausthaI, LeibnizsraJe 1.5, 38678
ClausthaI-Zellerfeld, Germany b Lehrstuhl ldnd Institut fir
Then-n&he Verfahrenstechnik, Universitiit h’arlsruhe TH, I
CaiserstraJe 12, 76131 Karlsrtlhe, Germany
[6]. Sadik kakac, “Heat Exchangers Selection, Rating and
Thermal Design”, 2002.
Fig f. Variation of Pressure drop w.r.t Flow rate on the Tube [7]. Sunilkumar Shinde, Mustansir Hatim Pancha “Comparative
side. Thermal Performance Analysis Of Segmental Baffle Heat
Exchanger with Continuous Helical Baffle Heat Exchanger
using Kern method. International Journal of Engineering
9. CONCLUSIONS
Research and Applications(IJERA),July-August 2012
The shell and tube heat exchanger is analyzed using Kern, Bell [8]. Nenad Radojkovic1, Gradimir Ilic1, Zarko Stevanovic,
and Bell Delaware methods and heat transfer coeffient, Mica Vukic1, Dejan Mitrovic1, Goran Vuckovic1
Reynold’s number, pressure drops are calculated for various “Experimental study on thermal and flow processes in shell and
mass flow rates and the results are shown in the graphs above. tube heat exchangers” Mechanical Engineering Vol. 1, No 10,
We found that, shell side heat transfer coefficient increases with 2003, pp. 1377 – 1384
increasing mass flow rate in all the three methods, but the heat [9]. Yao, Ye; Zhang, Xingyu; and Guo, Yiying,
transfer given by Bell Delaware method is much more than the "Experimental Study on Heat Transfer Enhancement of Water-
other two methods. Also the shell side pressure increase rapidly water Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchanger Assisted by Power
with increasing flow rate and this increase is again more in Bell Ultrasonic". International Refrigeration and Air Conditioning
Delaware method as compared to others. Conference (2010) [11] John E Edwards,
[10]. Young-Seok Son", J ee-Young Shin “Performance of a
Since in a baffled heat exchanger, there is a obstruction to flow, Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchanger with Spiral Baffle Plates”
drop in the pressure is definitely more when compared to the Dong-Eui University, Busan 614-714, Korea KSME
heat exchanger without baffles. Kern method does not take in to International Journal, Vol. 15. No. n. pp. 1555-1562, 2001
consideration the obstructions due to baffles in calculating the [11]. Tinker t. (1951) “shell-side characteristic of shell- and-
pressure drops and hence the pressure drop given by Kern tube heat exchangers”, parts ii, iii, and in: proceedings of
method is unrealistic. Whereas, the pressure drops given by Bell general discussion on heat transfer, institute of mechanical
and Bell Delaware methods, is more realistic, since these engineers and american society of mechanical engineers,
methods consider pressure drop due to bypass and leakage london, new york, pp. 89.
streams caused by the baffles in the heat exchanger. [12]. B.V. Babua, S.A. Munawar, Differential evolution
strategies for optimal design of shell-and-tube heat
__________________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 03 Special Issue: 03 | May-2014 | NCRIET-2014, Available @ http://www.ijret.org 495
IJRET: International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology eISSN: 2319-1163 | pISSN: 2321-7308
__________________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 03 Special Issue: 03 | May-2014 | NCRIET-2014, Available @ http://www.ijret.org 496