Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
International
I Number 1 2010 for Environmental Rehabilitation and Conservation
[17-21]
Volume I No. 1 2010 [17-21] Zade[ISSN
et al. 0975 - 6272]
Received: February 24, 2009 ⏐ Accepted: May 01, 2010 ⏐ Online: April 4, 2010
Abstract
Toxic effects of industrial effluents of an herbal treated effluent and toxicity was reduced by
pharmaceutical company to freshwater fish more than 30% with physico-chemical
Lebistes reticulatus (Peters) were investigated treatment alone. In order to further know the
during 96 hours static bioassay tests. LC50 reduction in toxic effect the-physico-
values for raw, neutralized and physico- chemically treated industrial effluent was
chemically treated industrial effluents of an subjected to biological treatment by activated
herbal pharmaceutical manufacturing company sludge system. The effluent after biological
were found out under standard laboratory treatment revealed no toxic effect to Lebistes
conditions. The behavior of the fish is also reticulatus for about a month pointing out that
recorded during experiments. It is evident from toxicity was fully reduced after biological
the toxicological studies that raw industrial treatment and the wastewater can be discharged
effluent was much more toxic as compared to
into inland surface waters without harming the
neutralized and physico- chemically
aquatic biota.
Toxicity testing of industrial effluents through freshwater fish Lebistes reticulates (Peters)
17
Volume I Number 1 2010 [17-21]
Zade et al.
remove dust, dirt and microbial contaminants. toxicity of industrial effluents were followed as
Apart from general washing the wastewater is per standard protocols (Doudorof, 1951,
generated from different processes like Sprague, 1969, Rao et al.,1982),
crushing, mixing, extraction, distillation,
The bioassay studies were carried out in glass
fermentation, decoction and utensil washing
aquaria of 10 Lit capacity using ten fishes in
based on market demand (Vanerkar et al.,
each container. Similar control was run parallel
2002). The organic, inorganic and toxic
with dilution water only. Suitable
components present in the effluent have direct
concentrations were prepared and a range
impact on aquatic organisms and it is very
finding test and final confirmatory test were
difficult to correlate the observed effect to
performed and readings on fish mortality were
specific pollutants as these effluents are
recorded at every 24 hours interval.
complex in nature having highly fluctuating
characteristics. Due to fluctuating market LC50 values were calculated as per Litchfield
demands these medicines are prepared in and Wilcoxon (1949). The results were
batches and so the characteristics of effluent are subjected to statistical analysis. Based on LC50
continuously changing. These wastewaters values, 95% confidence limits, slope and
have high Biochemical Oxygen Demand regression (R2) are calculated and presented in
(BOD), Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) and Table 2. Fish behaviour was also studied during
very high Suspended Solids (S.S.) with large the experiment of 96 hours duration.
amount of heavy metals, phenolics etc.
Toxicity testing of industrial effluents through freshwater fish Lebistes reticulates (Peters)
18
Volume I Number 1 2010 [17-21]
Zade et al.
It is thus inferred that this wastewater needs completely treated effluent is now non toxic to
treatment to reduce toxicity and lime fish as shown by healthy fish.
neutralization is effective in reducing the The herbal pharmaceuticals though age old and
toxicity. So the wastewater was subjected to referred in our Vedic scripts did not receive
physicochemical treatment using conventional much attention till recently but its importance
coagulants like ferric chloride, alum, lime and was understood quite late and they gained
ferrous sulphate. The cationic polymer popularity due to low side effects. Moreover
Oxyfloc-FL 11 gives good results at a dose of being herbal in nature their toxicity testing
300:0.25 mg/ liter at optimum combination for aspect was not seriously considered so far and
reduction in toxicity of the effluent. It was so they were not fully understood.
found that the toxicity was reduced by more
than 30%. Still it is not safe to discharge the Today bioassays provide a safe tool for
effluent as fishes do not survive for a long assessing the toxic effects of industrial
duration into it. So the effluent was subjected to wastewaters and chemicals and LC50 values
further biological treatment by aerobic play an important role in protecting the fish
activated sludge system and toxicity tests were communities (Basak and Konar 1977). The
conducted. results obtained from the bioassays will help
the industries to take necessary pollution
It was confirmed from the toxicity tests that the control measures before discharging effluents
effluent was completely safe for discharge after into natural waters which will help in
biological treatment as no fish mortality was minimizing the pollution and safeguarding our
observed for a period of one month. The aquatic organisms.
Parameters Raw effluent Neutralized Physic-chemically
effluent treated effluent
Colour Dark Yellow Grey Light Yellow
pH 3.6-4.00 6.9-7.50 6.6
Total acidity 1385 590 192
Total suspended solid 1800 1603 295
Total solids 4169 2536 538
BOD (5 days at 20°C) 6892 4820 1660
COD 12430 9600 3860 Table 1: Characteristics of
Sulphide as S-2 28 20 09 Herbal Pharmaceutical
Total Phosphates (PO4- 136 98 42 Industrial Effluents
2)
Time
Parameter Raw effluent Neutralized Physico‐ chemically
in Hrs effluent treated effluent
24 LC50 6.50 7.50 38.00
95% 4.2 ‐ 10.7 5.22‐10.90 33.2‐43.00
hrs
Confidence y= 0.0613x + y=0.04812x+ Y=0.057x + 35.40 Table 2: LC50 and Other
Limit, Slope 3.60 5.166 0.989
Estimated Values of Acute
R2 0.962 0.966
48 LC50 6.00 7.00 Toxicity Tests for Lebistes
37.50
95% 3.05‐11.50 5.60‐8.75
hrs 33.8‐42.2 reticulates (Peters) Exposed to
Confidence Y= 0.0623x + Y= 0.0413x +
Y= 0.055x + 35.08
Limit, Slope 2.90 4.936 Industrial Effluents (Herbal
0.984
R2 0.979 0.974
72 LC50 4.90 6.70 Pharmaceutical)
37.30
95% 2.70‐8.80 4.82‐9.10
hrs 33‐41.00
Confidence Y= 0.0625x+ Y= 0.0405x+
Y= 0.057x+ 34.6
Limit, Slope 1. 794 4.612
0.2785
R2 0.978 0.972
96 LC50 2.45‐7.80 6.30
36.80
95% 2.45‐7.80 4.25‐9.30
hrs 33.50‐40.20
Confidence Y= 0.0558x+ Y= 0.041 x+
Y= 0.06Ix+ 33.90
Limit, Slope 1.597 4.261
0.975
R2 0.982 0.983
References
APHA (1998). Standard Methods for the guppy Lebistes reticulates (Peters). Bull. Environ.
Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th Contam.Toxicol. 54: 57-59.
Edition, APHA, AWWA and WEF,
Litchfield J.T and Wilcoxon T.A. (1949).
Washington D.C.
Simplified Method of evaluating dose
Basak, P.K. and Konar S.K.(1977). A new method effect experiment. J. Pharmacol. Exper.
for the determination of safe concentration Theory 96:99-113.
of insecticides to protect fishes, Indian J
Rajashekharan P.E. (2002). World of Science:
.Environ. Health, 19(4): 283-292.
Herbal Medicine, Ministry of Information
Doudoroff, P., Anderson, E.G., Burdick, G.E., and Broadcasting, New Delhi, Employment
Galtsaf P.S., Hart W.E., Patrick, E.R., News, Sept. 21-27, pg.3-4.
Strong, E.R., Surber, E.W. and Vanitron,
Rao, DMR, Jothi Kumar and Krishnamoorthi K.P.
W.M. (1951). Bioassay Methods for the
(1982). A Course Manual on Fish Bioassay,
evaluation of acute toxicity of industrial
National Environmental Engineering
wastewater to fish. Sewage Ind. Waste, 23:
Research Institute, (NEERI), Nagpur. 1-53.
130.
Shrinivas, P, Benarji G, and Rao P. (1994).
Kumar, S., Sahay, S.S. and Sinha M. K. (1995).
Preliminary observation on the effect of
Bioassay of distillery effluent on common
Toxicity testing of industrial effluents through freshwater fish Lebistes reticulates (Peters)
20
Volume I Number 1 2010 [17-21]
Zade et al.
Toxicity testing of industrial effluents through freshwater fish Lebistes reticulates (Peters)
21