Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Edited by
I
The Use of Facet Theory for the Identification of Scholastic Competences 39
1. Introduction
B
[Ol. Ability 1 ]
sponding to the end of basic education. [02. Ability 2 ]
order to clearly define its assumptions and sketch its operational characteristics. [...................... 1
This model contemplates the definition of competences and of the students' [21.Ability21 ]
general abilities during the cognitive development period at the end of basic
education, considering it associated with the contents of fundamental and me- C
dium leveled teaching. Within this context, competences are structural modali-
of "knowing how to". Fig. 1. Mapping Sentence of the ENEM Competences Model
I
I
More specifically, the Competences model developed to structure ENEM
aims to evaluate five basic competences: 1. Mastery of language; 2. Understand-
ing of phenomena; 3. Facing of problem situations; 4. Construction of argu- In Table I a matrix is shown indicating the number of similar abilities
I ments; 5. Elaboration of proposals. Each competence would be related to a se- shared between the five competences and pointing out a quite high overlapping
for each comparison. In the end, these considerations are important in order to
1
I ries of abilit~es(21), each of them belng measured three times through objective
questions evaluated as of high, average and low difficulty. Therefore, the ENEM
test, from the cognitive perspective, results from an exam of competences and
&ow how the competences, by the way they were theoretically elaborated, are
not independent of each other.
abilities which shapes the contents translated into a series of itemslquestions
Table 1. Number of abilities shared between the five Competences
nomena situations
1
This exam already resulted in several data sets since 1998. Taking this
data basis into consideration, it is possible to accomplish an empiric verification
of the theoretical model of competences and abilities in agreement with facet
theory.
In the present article, the model of Competences will be verified from the
data basis of the year 2000, composed of 352.487 participants. This corresponds
to 23% of the end-of-term students from high school - if we consider the school
census of 1999 (N = 1.535.943). From the results of these analyses, to be done
using the Statsoft STATISTICA 6.0 statistical package, it will be possible to
identify the natural groupings of the 2 1 abilities without superposition or ambi-
guities and so establish underlying structural properties of facet(s) that represent
the universe of the information that compose ENEM problems. The establish-
ment of these facet(s) and its relationships will make it possible to supply sup-
port for future and probable problems elaboration and questions on ENEM tests.
2. Method
The sample of this study comprises the 352.487 participants of the ENEM 2000 Year of Birth
(59.1% girls and 40.9% boys). The frequency distribution for the year of birth is
Fig. 2. Year of birth for the participants of the ENEM 2000
presented below in Figure 2. More than half of the participants (64.8%) were
born in 1983 or later, indicating a majority of individuals aged 17 or less.
The frequency distribution for the monthly family income is presented in
Figure 3, below. Based on the mid-points of the seven intervals of income
considered in the form, and given a minimal wage value of R$ 15 1.OO at the
time, it is possible to estimate the average income of the sample to be of roughly
R$ 2.487,24, which is equivalent to approximately US$ 1,100.00.
About 42.7% of the participants went exclusively to 9Ih, loth and
1lth in public schools, 49.6% exclusively in private schools, and 7.7% to
both public and private schools. Estimating again from the mid-points of the
seven intervals of income considered in the form, the average income of those
who studied in:
o Public schools alone was of roughly R$ 1.038,58;
o Both in public and privates schools was of roughly R$ 2.275,36;
o Private schools alone was of roughly R$ 4.03 1,70.
Measuring income in the original 1-7 Likert scale used in the ENEM-form, all
the differences in income between the three types of schooling are statistically
significant (p<.05 on the Mann-Whitney U test).
Up to 1 2-5 10-30 More man SO
1-2 5-10 3GS0 No Response
Spearman Rho). This particular metric was chosen due to the ordinal nature of
Scatterplot 2D come, level of private schooling, no. of computers at home, access to computers
-
Distance 1-Spearman Rho Ward's Method - Alienation=.l2 and Stress=.lO at school, taking or not computer classes, night schooling), the following step-
wise models were obtained (Table 2).
Dimension 1
ables wlth a Ward's probability of 05 or less (other variables belng discarded).
Fig. 4. SSA of the 21 abilities
equals "1" and less than that equals "On, except when the variable in question is
46 Antonio Roazzi, Bruno C. de Souza, Wolfgang Bilsky, Maria da Graqa B.B. Dias
associating the socio-cultural variables present in the official ENEM form with Language seems to have a distant association with the variables private
the indexes created for each of three elements of the ability facet identified, so as schooling, having access to computers at school, participation in computer
to characterize the relationship between the three cognitive dimensions in ques- courses and night schooling (negative correlations, as indicated by the
tion and also between them and the predictive social and cultural variables con- ' coefficients from the logistic regressions summarized on Table 4).
sidered in the logistic regressions mentioned above (see Figure 5, below).
The above results tend to further corroborate the notion that the three elements
of an ability-facet identified are indeed distinct dimensions each with their par-
Ase ticular behavior and associations.
I
I
Appendix I
Table A l . Abilities vs. Compctences (1 = evaluates, 0 = does not evaluate)
Abilities
I
standing
I
Ill. Facing IV. Con- V. Elabora-
of problem struction of tion of pro- Total.-
situations arguments
I 0
posais
0 3
II
02 lnterpretat~onof 1 I 1 0 0
Cartesian plots
03 Analys~sand ~nterpretat~on of stat~s- I 0 1 1 1 4 3.
Phant~r
tlcal dlstr~butlons
04. Association between the uses of
language in different fields of knowl-
edge
1 0 I I 0
I
05 lnterpretatlon of texts accord~ngto I 0 0 1 1
sociocultural context
06 Analvs~sof the funchons of the I 1 0 I 0 . . . . r 1 _ - O A A
variations of language in a text
07. Characterization of energy conser- 0 1 1 0 I
Attltuaes, arereocypes
vationitransformation and its uses
08. Understanding of the impacts of 0 1 0 ' I I 3
using material and energetic resources
09. Understanding of the importance of 0 I 1 0 I 3
water and its physical variations
10. Using different time scales to de- 0 1 I 0 1 3
scribe transformations in geographic
space
11. Knowledge of the structures, pat- 1 1 0 0 1 3
terns and processes of living organisms
-
12. Knowledge of factors associated to I I I 0 I A
human development and qual~tyof life
13 Understand~ngEarth's b~o-system
and the impacts of human
I 1 0 1 1 4 1
14. Application of planar and spatial 1 1 1 I 1 5
geometry to real-life problems
15. Knowledge of Probability and Sta- 0 I I 1 0 3
tistics and their use to actual problems
16. Analysis and interpretation of envi- 0 1 I 0 1 3
ronmental problems and their solutions I