Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Sabrina Spilman
EDUC 458
Video Self-Analysis
3. The objective was measured by having students create a hyperbole poem that contains
three hyperboles and has four lines. Whenever the students were finished, they had one of
the teachers check to make sure they had at least three hyperboles and four lines. The
results were very impressive. About 80% of students used hyperbole in the correct
content and had at last three within their poem. The other 20% had trouble using a
4. The most effective aspect of the lesson occurred at time stamp 5:00. This aspect involved
calling up volunteers to underline one hyperbole they see within the poem that was on the
board. This aspect was effective because it allowed all students to get excited about
coming up and using the smartboard. Also, the students that were confused were able to
see what a hyperbole was multiple different times by watching their peers identify each
hyperbole. Within the Danielson Framework domains, I believe that this aspect fell under
Instruction. The key standard that this aspect best represented was Engaging Students in
Learning-Activities and Assignments. This aspect of the lesson fell under the Instruction
domain because during this aspect of the lesson, I am giving instruction to the students by
engaging the students. The Engaging Students in Learning key standard is the best
Spilman 2
category that fits the activity that I was doing with my students because I am engaging all
5. The least effective aspect of the lesson occurred at time stamp 17:06. This aspect began
the process of explaining to students the steps of writing a hyperbole poem. This aspect
of the lesson seemed to be ineffective because I was reading the steps one by one of
creating a hyperbole poem straight from the computer, rather than modeling or explaining
to students. However, I did model the steps after I had read from the computer. I think
that if I had spoken and conversated with the students about the steps when I was sitting
down with the students rather than when I was standing, it would have kept them more
engaged and able to understand the steps of creating a hyperbole poem better. This aspect
of the lesson also fell under the domain of Instruction. The standard in fell under was also
Engaging Students in Learning-Structure and Pacing. I believe this aspect of the lesson
fell under Instruction because it is part of where I am instructing the students on how to
do the assignment. This aspect fell under Structure and Pacing due to the fact that my
structure of the lesson is where I was standing and reading from the computer rather than
conversating with the students. The structure and pacing of this particular moment within
the lesson needs to be adjusted to how the students learn best and clearly organized into
6. During instruction, I made a few modifications. The first modification I made occurred at
4:15. Originally, I had not planned on having a student read the poem out loud. I had
planned on reading it out loud myself, and then calling on students to come up and
underline the hyperbole. As I continued, I realized that if I called on a student to read the
Spilman 3
poem, it would allow more students to be involved in the activity. As a growing teaching,
7. I think one modification I could make would be at time stamp 16:45. At this time, I
would possibly call on select students to come up and draw what image they have drawn
when they were listening to the poem. I think by allowing students to come up an share
what imagine they have in their head will help other students make connections and
understand better. Another modification that I would make to this lesson that would
1:40 I would have one or two students share their alliteration poems from yesterday so
that they could have a reminder of what their lesson was the day before. This will allow
8. The process of observing and analyzing my own instruction did impact my perspective in
video, I felt as if my lesson went rather smooth and that there wasn’t anything that I
needed to modify or make different. However, after observing my lesson the whole way
through, I realized that as an educator there will always be something that I can modify or
reiterate so that my students can get the most out of their learning. As I analyze my
lesson, I realized I had a lot of student integration, but there were times when it felt
rushed. Instead, I would want my students to feel like they aren’t in a hurry so that they
can learn to their fullest potential. By analyzing my lesson, I have noticed little things
instructional decision making significantly. The reason this activity opened my eyes to
instructional decision making is because I was able to see how my hands-on teaching
significantly gained knowledge whenever they had the opportunity to draw what they see
during poems, and when they were called up to underline the hyperbole within the poem
I realized that most lessons that I teach need to be hands-on and interactive. My
instructional decision making has been impacted dramatically after reviewing and