1

OX I GEN
OX = bull = baal = satan
founders of "oxygen" = Carl Wilhelm Scheele ----Antoine Lavoisier ----
Joseph Priestley --- all illuminati / freemasons / lunar society from "aristocratic
" families. as always .. no one has seen any atom / molecule .
under the patronage of ERASMUS DARWIN , grandfather of Charles Darwin ,
the bisexual freemason, rothschilds puppet , satanist . one more step towards
ATHEISM the occult satanic cult
"modern" chemistry = "ancient" alchemy reworded . OCCULT CHEMISTRY.
GEN --a combining form meaning “that which produces,” used in the formation
of compound words:
endogen; hydrogen : carcinogen
HYDROGEN = water former

Joseph Priestley FRS = FREEMASON (1733 – 1804) was an 18th-century

English Separatist theologian, natural philosopher, chemist, innovative
grammarian, multi-subject educator, and liberal political theorist who published
over 150 works. He has historically been credited with the discovery of oxygen,
although Carl Wilhelm Scheele and Antoine Lavoisier also have strong claims
to the discovery.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Priestley
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Wilhelm_Scheele
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antoine_Lavoisier

Politics had also thrown a long shadow across his professional life. The physical
sciences were in the grip of another French revolution, led by Antoine
Lavoisier. During the 1780s Lavoisier had “overthrown” the chemistry of the
previous century with his discovery of oxygen, from which he had been able to
establish new theories of combustion and to begin the process of reducing all
material substances to a basic table of elements. Lavoisier’s revolution had
split British chemistry: some recognised that his technically brilliant
experiments had transformed the science of matter, but for others his new and
foreign terminology was, like the French metric system and the revolutionary
Year Zero, an arrogant attempt to wipe away the accumulated wisdom of the
ages and to eliminate the role of God. = CONTROLLED OPPOSITION .
The old system of chemistry, with its mysterious forms of energy and its
languages of essences and principles, had readily contained the idea of a life-
force and the mysterious breath of the divine; but in Lavoisier’s cold new
 2

world, matter was reduced to inert building-blocks manipulated by the

measurable forces of pressure and temperature.
Robison had never accepted the French theories, and by 1797 had worked the
new chemistry deep into his Illuminatist plot. For him, Lavoisier – along with
Britain’s most famous experimental chemist, the dissenting minister Joseph
Priestley – was a master Illuminist, working in concert with infiltrated
Masonic lodges to spread the doctrine of materialism that would underlie
the new atheist world order. Madame Lavoisier’s famous salons, at which
the leading Continental philosophers met, were now revealed by Robison to
have been the venues for sacreligious rites where the hostess, dressed in the
ceremonial robes of an occult priestess, ritually burned the texts of the old
chemistry. Implausible though this image might seem, it was of a piece with
other proofs that Robison had assembled in his book – for example, the
anonymous German pamphlet that claimed that, at the great philosopher Baron
d’Holbach’s salons, the brains of living children bought from poor parents
were dissected in an attempt to isolate their life-force.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baron_d%27Holbach
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/holbach/
https://www.britannica.com/biography/Paul-Henri-Dietrich-baron-dHolbach
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2014/04/mike-jay/the-illuminati/

Antoine Lavoisier frequently corresponded with various members of the group

LUNAR SOCIETY.
At first called the Lunar Circle, "Lunar Society" became the formal name by
1775. The name arose because the society would meet during the full moon.
The members cheerfully referred to themselves as "lunarticks", a pun
on lunatics. Venues included Erasmus Darwin's home in Lichfield, Matthew
Boulton's home, Soho House, Bowbridge House in Derbyshire, and Great Barr
Hall.
The Lunar Society evolved through various degrees of organisation over a
period of up to fifty years .
Despite this uncertainty, fourteen individuals have been identified as having
verifiably attended Lunar Society meetings regularly over a long period during
its most productive eras: Matthew Boulton, Erasmus Darwin, Thomas
Day, Richard Lovell Edgeworth, Samuel Galton, Jr., James Keir, Joseph
Priestley, William Small, Jonathan Stokes, James Watt, Josiah
Wedgwood, John Whitehurst and William Withering.[8]
other members on group activities. include Richard Kirwan,[9] John
Smeaton,[10] Henry Moyes,[10] John Michell,[11] Pieter Camper,[10] R. E.
Raspe,[10] John Baskerville,[6] Thomas Beddoes,[12] John Wyatt,[13] William
Thomson,[12] Cyril V. Jackson,[12] Jean-André Deluc,[14] John Wilkinson,[15]John
 3

Ash,[14] Samuel More,[16] Robert Bage,[17] James Brindley,[16] Ralph

Griffiths,[16] John Roebuck,[16] Thomas Percival,[16] Joseph Black,[16] James
Hutton,[16] Benjamin Franklin,[5] Joseph Banks,[18] William
Herschel,[18]Daniel Solander,[18] John Warltire,[18] George Fordyce,[18] Alexander
Blair,[18]Samuel Parr,[18] Louis Joseph d'Albert d'Ailly, William Emes, the
seventh Duke of Chaulnes,[18] Barthélemy Faujas de Saint-Fond,[18] Grossart de
Virly,[18] Johann Gottling.[19] and Joseph Wright[20]

The nature of the group was to change significantly with the move to
Birmingham in 1765 of the Scottish physician William Small, who had been
Professor of Natural Philosophy at The College of William & Mary
in Williamsburg, Virginia. There he had taught and been a major influence
over Thomas Jefferson, and had formed the focus of a local group of
intellectuals. His arrival with a letter of introduction to Matthew Boulton from
Benjamin Franklin HELLFIRE CLUB / FREEMASON was to have a
galvanising effect on the existing circle, which began to explicitly identify itself
as a group and actively started to attract new members.[28]
In late 1780 the nature of the society was to change again with the move to
Birmingham of Joseph Priestley. Shortly after his arrival Lunar meetings
moved from Sunday afternoons to Mondays to accommodate Priestley's duties
as a clergyman.
Lunar meetings were continued by the younger generation of the families of
earlier Lunar members, including Gregory Watt, Matthew Robinson
Boulton, Thomas Wedgwood and James Watt junior, and possibly Samuel
Tertius Galton.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_Society_of_Birmingham

William Small (13 October 1734 – 25 February 1775) was born

in Carmyllie, Angus, Scotland, the son of a Presbyterian minister, James Small .
In 1764 Small returned to Britain, with a letter of introduction to Matthew
Boulton from Benjamin Franklin. Through this connection Small was elected
to the Lunar Society . In 1765 he received his MD and established a medical
practice in Birmingham, and shared a house with John Ash, a leading
theologian in the city. Small was Boulton's physician and became a close friend
of Erasmus Darwin, Thomas Day, James Keir, James Watt, Anna Seward and
others connected with the Lunar Society.
http://www.jquarter.org.uk/webdisk/morelunar.htm

Joseph Priestley, “Aerial Philosopher”: Metaphysics and Methodology in

Priestley's Chemical Thought
 4

Led by Erasmus Darwin, the Lunar Society of Birmingham was formed from
a group of experimenters, tradesmen and artisans who met and made friends in
the Midlands in the 1760s. Among them were the ambitious toy-maker Matthew
Boulton and his partner James Watt, of steam-engine fame; the potter Josiah
Wedgwood; the larger-than-life Erasmus Darwin, physician, poet, inventor
and theorist of evolution (a forerunner of his grandson Charles Darwin). Later
came Joseph Priestley, discoverer of oxygen .

https://www.gracesguide.co.uk/Lunar_Society
SOME FAMOUS FREEMASONS
LAVOISIER
https://translate.google.co.in/translate?hl=en&sl=fr&u=http://conscience-
eburnie.over-blog.com/article-attention-attention-les-francs-ma-ons-a-nos-
trousses-les-illuminati-tiennent-le-monde-73156755.html&prev=search

http://www.lodgestpatrick.co.nz/famous.php

The Lunar Society gathered a few prominent people of the Western Midlands in
the vicinity of Birmingham in the the late XIXth century. Entrepreneurs as well
as scientists merged in a small club not exceeding fourteen people. They were
friends and supported the new technical and economical trends of their time.
They were also sons of Newton developing sciences such as geology,
electricity, chemistry, material sciences, medecine....The most eminent Lunar
Men were Erasmus Darwin FREEMASON a polymath and physician (grand
father of Charles Darwin), James Watt inventor of the famous steam engine,
Joseph Priestley well known for his discoveries in chemeistry and electriciy,
Josiah Wedgwood (the other grand-father of Charles Darwin) who reinvented
pottery, Mathew Boulton an industry leader...They were fond of hydrology and
favoured the canals network as well. They dedicated themselves to the
support of the French Revolution, to the birth of the Republic of the United
States, to the abolition of slavery and also to to the spreading of education
among women. In only twenty years they completely changed the english
way of life as well as that of the Continent. Benjamin Franklin, Jean-Jacques
Rousseau, Antoine lavoisier, William Herschel, the Montgolfier brothers and a
myriad of other people corresponded and visited them.

=== Prominent in the circle (Jacobin movement in Britain ) apart from William
Blake were William Godwin, Tom Paine, Mary Wollstonecraft, Henri Fuseli
and the radical intellectual Joseph Priestley ----C.S. Lewis thus says, " Giants,
dragons, paradises, gods and the likes are themselves the expression of certain
basic elements in man's spiritual experience. In that sense they are more like
words" (Raine xxvii). Stewart Crehan for instance, aligns Blake with "English
Jacobinism .
 5

The London Revolution Society was formed 1788, ostensibly to commemorate

the centennial of the Glorious Revolution of 1688 and the landing of William
III, and was one of several radical societies in Britain in the 1790s. Other
similar Revolution Societies were formed in provincial cities such as Norwich,
which rivalled Sheffield as the centre of English Jacobinism.[1]
Many of the members of the London Revolution Society were also members of
the Society for Constitutional Information (CSI), 1780–1794. Along with
some Anglicans a large number of English Dissenters and Unitarians were at the
centre of the Society including Richard Price, Joseph Priestley, Andrew
Kippis, Abraham Rees, Theophilus Lindsey, Thomas Belsham, and Thomas
Brand Hollis.[2] At the time of the fall of the Bastille in July 1789, the London
Revolution Society was the most vocal of the radical societies. The meeting
place in 1789 was the London Tavern.[3] The group became increasingly
supportive of the French Revolution, then still in its initial stages. Their
November 1789 address to the French National Assembly would inspire the
creation of the first French Jacobin Club [4] The Society continued its activities
in 1790–1792 but after 1792 the radical momentum shifted from the London
Revolution Society back to the SCI and the London Corresponding
Society (LCS)[5] The LCS was arguably the most influential and the longest-
surviving of the societies.[6]
The London Revolution Society last met in 1792, as most of these societies
went inactive after the conservative reaction in 1792–1794, when, following
local sedition trials in 1792 and 1793, William Pitt the Younger initiated
the 1794 Treason Trials, followed by the Seditious Meetings Act 1795.
[[ the tavern was situated in Bishopsgate in the City of London
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/London_Tavern

Organisations using the hall included: African Institution , Anti-Slavery

Society[1] British and Foreign Bible Society[1] Highland and Island Emigration
Society[2] The Football Association (FA) held its first meeting here on 26
October 1863 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freemasons%27_Tavern ]]

Priestley and other Lunar Society members argued that the new French system
was too expensive, too difficult to test, and unnecessarily complex.

The Franklin-Lavoisier Prize is the Science History Institute’s first

international award. Named forAntoine-Laurent Lavoisier and Benjamin
Franklin
 6

Academy Royale des Sciences was charged with the task of setting the
investigation of animal magnetism and organized two groups of investigators:
one consisting of four scientists: Benjamin
Franklin, Antoine Laurent Lavoisier, Jean Sylvain Bailly, and Antoine-
Laurent de Jussieu; the other consisting of physicians from ...

http://brewminate.com/darkness-over-all-john-robison-and-the-birth-of-the-
illuminati-conspiracy/

Lunar Society .Look at its membership - both grandfathers of Charles Darwin

(yes, both of them), the founders of the Industrial Revolution (Matthew
Boulton, James Watt, Richard Arkwright etc.), the founders of the American
Revolution (Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson), the founders of the
Scientific Revolution (Joseph Priestly, Antoine Lavoisier), and much else
besides.

Founded in 1560, the Roshaniya were a mystery school, political movement,

and army all rolled into one. While an Islamic sect on the surface , the
Roshaniya operated under a highly mystic doctrine and it's founder, Bayezid
Ansari, was known as the "Apostle of Light". Similiar to the Alumbrados , the
Roshaniya also had a practice of intense meditations known as "khilwats"
where they proportedly were able to communicate with the Supreme Being(10)
and recieve premonition. Ansari wrote a number of books. Branded a religious
heretic, Ansari was mockingly dubbed the "Apostle of Darkness" and the
Roshaniya movement is said to have ended in 1736 with the death of their last
leader. However, Roshaniya teaching says that the spirits of their deceased
members would remain to enjoy time on Earth with full knowledge of their past
lives and the ability to act through the bodies of still living members.

The Illuminaten of Bavaria was created by Adam Weishaupt in 1776. Founder

Adam Weishaupt, known in correspendence as "Spartacus", describes how the
mainly academic and political Illuminaten was structured in the image of a
mystic sect. Weishaupt envisioned himself as the creator of a new religion. The
holy faith of Reason.

Mysterious Beginnings

(1) Islamic Parallels

"Sufi historian Indries Shah traces the name of the Illuminati back to a
verse in the Koran which mentions a shining star..."
- Robert Anton Wilson, Cosmic Trigger
See Patar and the Judean Illuminator for ancient Egyptian and Judean
connections to the "Illuminati".
 7

"The term 'Illuminati' was used by one early writer, Menendez Pelayo, as
early as 1492 and is attributable to a group known as the 'Alumbrados' of
Spain. The Alumbrados were said to receive secret knowledge from an
unknown higher source, resulting in superior human intelligence. This
group was condemned by an edict of the Grand Inquisition in 1623..."
"Some writers claim that a group know as the 'Illuminated Ones' was
founded by Joachim of Floris in the eleventh century and taught a
primitive, supposedly Christian doctrine of 'poverty and equality'."
- William T. Still, New World Order

"The sixteenth century saw the rise of a powerful society based upon a
secret cult, in the mountains of Afghanistan - the Roshaniya, Illuminated
ones."
"The earliest figure named in the history of the cult is one Bayezid
Ansari, of Afghanistan, whose family claimed descent from the Ansar -
the 'Helpers', who assisted Mohammed after his flight from Mecca nearly
fourteen hundred years ago. As a reward for this service, he stated, his
ancestors had been granted initiation into the mysteries of the Ishmaelite
religion: the secret, inner training which dated from Abraham's rebuilding
of the Temple at Mecca, the mystical Hiram."

"Not far from Peshawar, which is now in the north-west of Pakistan,

Bayezid set up a small school, where he carefully coached those who had
been initiated by him in the knowledge of the supernatural that he
claimed. A period of probation was expected from each candidate, during
which he would go into periods of concealment or meditation, known as
khilwat - silence. During this time he was to receive the illumination
which was emanated from the supreme being, who desired a class of
perfect men- and women- to carry out the organization and direction of
the world." -- PERFECTIBILIST / EUGENICS

Merchants and soldiers "contributed lavishly to the chief's upkeep and his
most expensive military, political and espionage system." At this stage of
success, Bayezid now preached that there was "no after-life of the kind
currently believed in: no reward or punishment, only a spirit state which
was completely different from earthly life. The spirits, if they belonged to
the Order, could continue to enjoy themselves and be earthly powers,
acting through living members....Eat, drink and be merry. Gain power,
look after yourself. You have no allegiance except to the Order, he told
them: and all humanity which cannot identify itself by our secret sign is
our lawful prey."
 8

"Forty years after the last religio-military leader of the ‘Afghan

Illuminate Ones’ died, a society of the same name (the Illuminati) came
into being in Germany, formed, it is said, by Adam Weishaupt, the young
professor of Canon Law at Ingolstadt University. Coincidences of date
and beliefs connect these Bavarian Illuminati with the Afghan ones, and
also with other cults which called themselves 'Illuminated'."
- Arkon Daraul, Secret Societies

In Mary Shelly's novel Frankenstein, Victor Frankenstein was also in

Ingoldstatdt around 1790 creating his famous monster. "Coincidence...or
was there something Mary Shelly was trying to tell us?"

John Robison FRSE (4 February 1739 – 30 January 1805) was

a Scottish physicist and mathematician. He was a professor of philosophy at
the University of Edinburgh.[1]
A member of the Edinburgh Philosophical Society when it received its royal
warrant, he was appointed as the first general secretary to the Royal Society of
Edinburgh (1783–98). Robison invented the siren and also worked with James
Watt on an early steam car. He authored Proofs of a Conspiracy in 1797—a
polemic accusing Freemasonry of being infiltrated by Weishaupt's Order of
the Illuminati.
His son was the inventor Sir John Robison (1778–1843).
The physicist
The son of John Robison, a Glasgow merchant, he was born in
Boghall, Baldernock, Stirlingshire (now East Dunbartonshire) and
attended Glasgow Grammar School and the University of Glasgow (MA
1756).[2] After a brief stay in London in 1758 Robison became the tutor to
the midshipman son of Admiral Knowles, sailing with the Royal
Navy on General Wolfe's expedition to Quebec and Portugal (1756–62).
His mathematical skills were employed in navigation and surveying. Returning
to England in 1762, he joined the Board of Longitude — a team of scientists
who tested John Harrison’s marine chronometer on a voyage to Jamaica.
On his return he settled in Glasgow engaging in the practical science of James
Watt and Joseph Black in opposition to the systematic continental European
chemistry of Antoine Lavoisier and its adherents such as Joseph Priestley. In
1766 he succeeded Black as Professor of Chemistry at the University of
Glasgow. He in turn was succeeded in 1770 by Black's assistant, William
Irvine.[3]
 9

In 1769, he announced that balls with like electrical charges repel each other
with a force that varies as the inverse-squared of the distance between them,
anticipating Coulomb's law of 1785.[4]
In 1770 he travelled to Saint Petersburg as the secretary of Admiral Charles
Knowles, where he taught mathematics to the cadets at the Naval Academy
at Cronstadt, obtaining a double salary and the rank of lieutenant colonel.
Robison returned to Scotland in 1773 and took up the post of Professor
of Natural Philosophy at the University of Edinburgh. He lectured
on mechanics, hydrostatics, astronomy, optics, electricity and magnetism. His
conception of mechanical philosophy’ became influential in nineteenth-century
British physics. His name appears in the 1776 "Minute Book of The Poker
Club", a crucible of the Scottish Enlightenment. In 1783 he became General
Secretary of the Royal Society of Edinburgh and in 1797 his articles for
the Encyclopædia Britannica gave a good account of the scientific,
mathematical and technological knowledge of the day. He also prepared for
publication, in 1799, the chemical lectures of his friend and mentor, Joseph
Black.
Robison worked with James Watt on an early steam car. This project came to
nothing and has no direct connection to Watt's later improvement of
the Newcomen steam engine. He along with Joseph Black and others gave
evidence about Watt's originality and their own lack of connection to his key
idea of the Separate Condenser.
Robison did however invent the siren, though it was Charles Cagniard de la
Tour who named it , after producing an improved model.
Towards the end of his life,he published Proofs of a Conspiracy ... in 1797,
alleging clandestine intrigue by the Illuminati and Freemasons (the work's full
title was Proofs of a Conspiracy against all the Religions and Governments of
Europe, carried on in the secret meetings of Freemasons, Illuminati and
Reading Societies). The secret agent monk, Alexander Horn provided much of
the material for Robison's allegations.[5] French priest Abbé
Barruel independently developed similar views that the Illuminati had
infiltrated Continental Freemasonry, leading to the excesses of the French
Revolution.[6][7] In 1798, the Reverend G. W. Snyder sent Robison's book
to George Washington for his thoughts on the subject in which he replied to him
in a letter:[8]
“It was not my intention to doubt that, the Doctrines of the Illuminati, and
principles of Jacobinism had not spread in the United States. On the contrary,
no one is more truly satisfied of this fact than I am. The idea that I meant to
convey, was, that I did not believe that the Lodges of Free Masons
in this Country had, as Societies, endeavoured to propagate the diabolical tenets
of the first, or pernicious principles of the latter (if they are susceptible of
 10

separation). That Individuals of them may have done it, or that

the founder, or instrument employed to found, the Democratic Societies in the
United States, may have had these objects; and actually had a separation of
the People from their Government in view, is too evident to be questioned”.

In 1779 Gadolin moved to Uppsala University, publishing his dissertation

Dissertatio chemica de analysi ferri on the analysis of iron under the direction of
Torbern Bergman. Bergman founded an important research school, had many
students, including Gadolin, Johan Gottlieb Gahn and Carl Wilhelm Scheele .
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torbern_Bergman
https://www.britannica.com/biography/Torbern-Olof-Bergman
Numerous leading mineralogists were associated with the Crowned Hope
Masonic Lodge. Apart from von Born, one of the most
distinguished of these was the Swedish mineralogist and protogeologist Torbern
Bergman (1735-1784) who was extremely influential in European scientific
circles, and greatly influenced not only……..

https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Category:English_biologists
== Charles Darwin’s oldest son, William Erasmus Darwin, became a banker in
Grant and Maddison’s Union Banking Company of Southhampton. In 1903 that
bank was acquired by Lloyd’s. William Darwin’s wife died in 1902, and he
moved to London soon afterwards. Director of Grant and Maddison’s Union
Banking Company of Southhampton really qualifies as being a “globalist
international banker”.
Charles Darwin did get immense help from being related to the Wedgwoods, in
that much of his inheritance, and his wife’s own fortune, were both Wedgwood
family money. Darwin listed his occupation as “businessman”. he wrote this on
a questionnaire circulated to scientists by his cousin Francis Galton in 1873

Special talents?—None, except for business, as evinced by keeping accounts,

replies to correspondence, and investing money very well. Very methodical in
all my habits.

English biologists" William Bateson, Colin Blakemore ,Arthur Henry Reginald

Buller, Charles Darwin , Erasmus Darwin, Ronald Fisher, Francis Galton ,
Julian Huxley , Victor Rothschild, 3rd Baron Rothschild, John Maynard
Smith , Alfred Russel Wallace , Ian Wilmut
https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Category:English_biologists

ROTHSCHILD AND THE GAY CAMBRIDGE APOSTLES

 11

http://www.kings.cam.ac.uk/archive-centre/archive-month/january-2011.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cambridge_Apostles
http://www.glbtqarchive.com/ssh/cambridge_apostles_S.pdf
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Df9XWBlpzRg
https://www.amazon.com/Cambridge-Apostles-History-Universitys-
Intellectual/dp/0374118205

Lord Victor Rothschild was a key member of the secret society known as the
Cambridge Apostles. The Cambridge Apostles was founded in 1820 by twelve
right-wing Christian evangelical students under the name The Cambridge
Conversazione Society. The Cambridge Apostles enjoyed ‘homoeroticism’ and
‘Platonic love’. Famous members of the Apostles have included: Erasmus
Alvey Darwin (brother of Charles Darwin), George Lockhart Rives (US
Assistant Secretary of State and planner of the New York subway), A. J.
Balfour (UK Prime Minister who gives his name to the Balfour Declaration),
Bertrand Russell (philosopher), “The Llewellyn Davies family figured in ….
G.E. Moore and the Cambridge Apostles, because two of the brothers,
Crompton and Theodore (Llewellyn Davies) were Apostles, handsome, clever
fellows who were close friends of Moore (and of Bertrand Russell).”; Eddie
Marsh (private secretary to Winston Churchill), John Maynard Keynes
(economist), James Strachey (editor and translator of Sigmund Freud), Ludwig
Wittgenstein (philosopher), Victor Rothschild (financier and spy), Anthony
Blunt (spy), Guy Burgess (spy), Guy Liddell (spy) and Noel Annan (spy). In
1940 Rothschild (above) suggested that Anthony Blunt should be invited to join
the secret service. He also rented a house to his friend Guy Burgess. Rothschild
worked with Kim Philby at the MI6 offices established at the Rothschild family
mansion in Paris. Between 1979 and 1982, several Apostles were exposed as
having belonged to a spy ring, reportedly run by Lord Victor Rothschild. The
spy ring included Kim Philby, who almost became head of MI6, Guy Burgess,
an MI6 officer and secretary to the Deputy Foreign Minister, Donald Maclean, a
UK diplomat and KGB colonel, Anthony Blunt, an MI5 officer and art adviser
to the Queen,… http://aangirfan.blogspot.pt/2013/06/rothschild-and-gay-
cambridge-apostles.html
Others said to be involved in the spy ring include John Cairncross, Michael
Whitney Straight and Guy Liddell.

http://abundanthope.net/pages/Political_Information_43/ROTHSCHILD-AND-
THE-GAY-CAMBRIDGE-APOSTLES_printer.shtml
http://aangirfan.blogspot.in/2013/06/rothschild-and-gay-cambridge-
apostles.html
ALL PROMINENT ENLIGHTENMENT FIGURES WERE FREEMASONS
https://philosophynow.org/issues/40/The_Enlightenments
 12

The separation of church and state, the promotion of feminist rights including
abortion, and the New Age religion have been promoted by the Masonic lodges,
not just individual Masons.
https://archive.org/stream/HeresyInterlocksFreemasonrySpringmeier/Heresy%2
0Interlocks%20Freemasonry%20Springmeier_djvu.txt
Eliphas Lévi & the French Occult Revival-Christopher McIntosh
https://issuu.com/sigabopha/docs/eliphas_l__vi___the_french_occult_r

Antoine Lavoisier would soon give the name "oxygen." Lavoisier would name
hydrogen, from the Greek words for "water maker."
https://www.acs.org/content/acs/en/education/whatischemistry/landmarks/josep
hpriestleyoxygen.html http://slideplayer.com/slide/8586024/

Joseph Priestley
In fact his name for Oxygen was ‘dephlogisticated’ air. While in Paris he was
talking about his discoveries when he met Antoine Lavoisier and told him about
his ‘dephlogisticated’ air. Lavoisier recognized the significance of this
discovery and repeated Priestly’s experiments, even adding some of his own. It
was Lavoisier who coined the phrase Oxygen. Interestingly enough, Oxygen
was also isolated by the Swedish chemist and apothecary Carl Wilhelm
Scheele, probably by 1773. Of the three people, Priestly is given the credit for
the discovery.

So, how did he isolate something you can’t see? By heating red mercuric
oxide and collecting the gas given off, he had isolated Oxygen, inadvertently
reversing the oxidation process. He then did experiments with flame and
animals to prove the isolation of the ‘new’ gas. In Priestly’s experiments,
he observed that fire ate up Oxygen and that plants produced it , setting up a
whole new field to study leading to the discovery of photosynthesis.
https://www.masoniccharitablefoundation.org/wp-
content/uploads/entablature_07_color.pdf
http://brewminate.com/darkness-over-all-john-robison-and-the-birth-of-the-
illuminati-conspiracy/

Lavoisier was a powerful member of a number of aristocratic councils, and an

administrator of the Ferme générale. The Ferme générale was one of the most
hated components of the Ancien Régime because of the profits it took at the
expense of the state, the secrecy of the terms of its contracts, and the violence of
its armed agents.

He also pushed for public education in the sciences. He founded two

organizations, Lycée and Musée des Arts et Métiers, which were created to
 13

serve as educational tools for the public. Funded by the wealthy and noble, the
Lycée regularly taught courses to the public beginning in 1793.

At the age of 26, around the time he was elected to the Academy of Sciences,
Lavoisier bought a share in the Ferme générale, a tax farming financial
company which advanced the estimated tax revenue to the royal government in
return for the right to collect the taxes.
Lavoisier was a formative influence in the formation of the Du Pont gunpowder
business because he trained Éleuthère Irénée du Pont, its founder, on
gunpowder making in France; the latter said that the Du Pont gunpowder mills
"would never have been started but for his kindness to me."
His name is one of the 72 names of eminent French scientists, engineers and
mathematicians inscribed on the Eiffel Tower as well as on buildings around
Killian Court at MIT in Cambridge, MA US.

In October the English chemist Joseph Priestley visited Paris, where he met
Lavoisier and told him of the air which he had produced by heating the red
calx of mercury with a burning glass and which had supported combustion
with extreme vigor.

After returning from Paris, Priestley took up once again his investigation of the
air from mercury calx. His results now showed that this air was not just an
especially pure form of common air but was "five or six times better than
common air, for the purpose of respiration, inflammation, and ... every
other use of common air." He called the air , dephlogisticated air, as he
thought it was common air deprived of its phlogiston. Since it was therefore in a
state to absorb a much greater quantity of phlogiston given off by burning
bodies and respiring animals, the greatly enhanced combustion of substances
and the greater ease of breathing in this air were explained.

==== Oxygen was discovered independently by Carl Wilhelm Scheele,

in Uppsala, in 1773 or earlier, and Joseph Priestleyin Wiltshire, in 1774, but
Priestley is often given priority because his work was published first. The
name oxygen was coined in 1777 by Antoine Lavoisier. ======

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxygen One of the first known experiments on

the relationship between combustion and air was conducted by the 2nd century
BCE Greek writer on mechanics, Philo of Byzantium.??PROOF ? Many
centuries later Leonardo da Vinci built on Philo's work by observing that a
portion of air is consumed during combustion and respiration. In the late 17th
century, Robert Boyle proved that air is necessary for combustion. English
chemist John Mayow (1641–1679) refined this work by showing that fire
requires only a part ?? PROOF? of air that he called spiritus nitroaereus.
 14

Established in 1667 by the German alchemist J. J. Becher, and modified by the

chemist Georg Ernst Stahl by 1731,[9] phlogiston theory stated that all
combustible materials were made of two parts. One part, called phlogiston, was
given off when the substance containing it was burned, while the
dephlogisticated part was thought to be its true form, or calx. Highly
combustible materials that leave little residue, such as wood or coal, were
thought to be made mostly of phlogiston; non-combustible substances that
corrode, such as iron, contained very little.

Oxygen was first discovered by Swedish pharmacist Carl Wilhelm Scheele. He

had produced oxygen gas by heating mercuric oxide and various nitrates in
1771–2. In the meantime, on August 1, 1774, an experiment conducted by the
British clergyman Joseph Priestley focused sunlight on mercuric oxide (HgO)
inside a glass tube, which liberated a gas he named "dephlogisticated air". He
noted that candles burned brighter in the gas and that a mouse was more active
and lived longer while breathing it. After breathing the gas himself, he wrote:
"The feeling of it to my lungs was not sensibly different from that of common
air, but I fancied that my breast felt peculiarly light and easy for some time
afterwards."
The French chemist Antoine Laurent Lavoisier later claimed to have discovered
the new substance independently. Priestley visited Lavoisier in October 1774
and told him about his experiment and how he liberated the new gas. Scheele
also posted a letter to Lavoisier on September 30, 1774 that described his
discovery of the previously unknown substance, but Lavoisier never
acknowledged receiving it (a copy of the letter was found in Scheele's
belongings after his death). he proved?? that air is a mixture of two gases;
'vital air', which is essential to combustion and respiration, and azote (Greek=
"lifeless"), which did not support either. Azote later became nitrogen in
English, although it has kept the earlier name in French and several other
European languages.

John Dalton's original atomic hypothesis presumed that all elements were
monoatomic and that the atoms in compounds would normally have the
simplest atomic ratios with respect to one another. For example, Dalton
assumed that water's formula was HO, giving the atomic mass of oxygen 8
times that of hydrogen, instead of the modern value of about 16.[16] In
1805, Joseph Louis Gay-Lussac and Alexander von Humboldt showed ??? that
water is formed of two volumes of hydrogen and one volume of oxygen; and by
1811 Amedeo Avogadro had arrived at the correct?? interpretation of water's
composition, based on what is now called Avogadro's law and the diatomic
elemental molecules in those gases.
 15

Oxygen entered the English language despite opposition by English scientists

and the fact that the Englishman Priestley had first isolated the gas and written
about it. This is partly due to a poem praising the gas titled "Oxygen" in the
popular book The Botanic Garden (1791) by Erasmus Darwin, grandfather of
Charles Darwin.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Louis_Gay-Lussac Humboldt's popular
writings inspired many scientists and naturalists, including Charles Darwin,
Henry David Thoreau, John Muir, George Perkins Marsh, Ernst Haeckel,[153]
as well as brothers Richard Schomburgk and Robert Schomburgk. Humboldt
would later reveal to Darwin in the 1840s that he had been a fan of Darwin's
grandfather's poetry. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_von_Humboldt
He graduated in ecclesiastical law .Avogadro is hailed as a founder of the
atomic-molecular theory. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amedeo_Avogadro
Lorenzo Romano Amedeo Carlo Avogadro, Count of Quaregna and Cerreto .

WATER
We start with the atom, and then go on to the rules governing the kinds of
structural units that can be made from them. We are taught early on to predict
the properties of bulk matter from these geometric arrangements. And then we
come to H2O, and are shocked to find that many of these predictions are way
off, and that water (and by implication, life itself) should not even exist on our
planet!

There are few molecules that are more stable and difficult to decompose than
water. Water is one of the few known substances whose solid form is less dense
than the liquid. The other widely-cited anomalous property of water is its high
boiling point. A molecule as light as H2O "should" boil at around –90°C; that
is, it would exist in the world as a gas rather than a liquid [[ if H-bonding were
not present -- ?? who has seen it ?]] . Notice that H-bonding is also observed
with fluorine and nitrogen.

Because molecules are smaller than light waves, they cannot be observed
directly, and must be "visualized"[imagined] by alternative means.
 16

This computer-generated image comes from calculations that model the

electron distribution in the H2O . The view first developed in the 1950's that
water is a collection of "flickering clusters" of varying sizes has gradually been
abandoned as being unable to account for many of the observed properties of
the liquid. The present thinking, influenced greatly by molecular modeling
simulations beginning in the 1980s, is that on a very short time scale (less than
a picosecond), water is more like a "gel" consisting of a single, huge hydrogen-
bonded cluster. On a 10-12-10-9 sec time scale, rotations and other thermal
motions cause individual hydrogen bonds to break and re-form in new
configurations, inducing ever-changing local discontinuities whose extent and
influence depends on the temperature and pressure.

This computer-generated nanoscale view of liquid water is from the lab of

Gene Stanley of Boston University . The oxygen atoms are red, the hydrogen
atoms white . It is quite likely that over very small volumes, localized (H2O)n
 17

polymeric clusters may have a fleeting existence, and many theoretical

calculations have been made showing that some combinations ? are more stable
than others. While this might prolong their lifetimes, it does not appear that
they remain intact long enough to detect as directly observable entities in
ordinary bulk water at normal pressures. Theoretical models suggest that the
average cluster may encompass as many as 90 H2O molecules at 0°C, so that
very cold water can be thought of as a collection of ever-changing ice-like
structures. At 70° C, the average cluster size is probably no greater than about
25. It must be emphasized that no stable clustered unit or arrangement has ever
been isolated or identified in pure bulk liquid water. A 2006 report suggests
that a simple tetrahedral arrangement is the only long-range structure that
persists at time scales of a picosecond or beyond. But for an interesting (and
somewhat controversial) alternative view, see article by the late Rustum Roy.

To a chemist, the term "pure" has meaning only in the context of a particular
application or process.
When water of the highest obtainable purity is required for certain types of
exacting measurements, it is commonly filtered, de-ionized, and triple-vacuum
distilled. But even this "chemically pure" water is a mixture of isotopic species:
there are two stable ? isotopes of both hydrogen (H1 and H2, the latter often
denoted by D) and oxygen (O16 and O18) which give rise to combinations such
as H2O18, HDO16, etc., all of which are readily identifiable ? in the infrared
spectra of water vapor.

It has recently been found (Langmuir 2003, 19, 6851-6856) that freshly distilled
water takes a surprisingly long time to equilibrate with the atmosphere, that it
undergoes large fluctuations in pH and redox potential, and that these effects are
greater when the water is exposed to a magnetic field. The reasons for this
behavior are not clear, but one possibility? is that dissolved O2 molecles, which
are paramagnetic, might be involved.
What kind of water is most healthy to drink? No evidence indicating that any
one type of water (including highly "pure" water) is more beneficial to health
than any other, as long as the water is pathogen-free and meets accepted
standards. For those who are sensitive to residual chlorine or still have concerns,
a good activated-carbon filter is usually satisfactory. More extreme measures
such as reverse-osmosis or distillation are only justified in demonstrably
extreme situations.

The idea that alkaline water is better to drink than acidic water is widely
promoted by alternative-health hucksters who market worthless "water ionizer"
machines for this purpose. Acidic water is sometimes described by engineers as
"aggressive"; this refers to its tendency to corrode metal distribution pipes, but
 18

in this sense it is no more active than the hydrochloric acid already present in
your gastric fluid!
One occasionally hears that mineral-free water, and especially distilled water,
are unhealthy because they "leach out" required minerals from the body. There
is no truth to this. An extensive 2008 study failed to confirm earlier reports that
low calcium/magnesium in drinking water correlates with cardiovascular
disease. Any well-balanced diet should supply all the mineral substances we
need.

It is well known that people who are engaged in heavy physical activity or are
in a very hot environment should avoid drinking large quantities of even
ordinary water. In order to prevent serious electrolyte imbalance problems, it is
necessary to make up for the salts lost through perspiration.
Drinking constitutes only one source of our water; many foods, especially those
containing “cells” (fruits, vegetables, meats) are an important secondary source.
In addition, a considerable amount of water (350-400 mL/day) is produced
metabolically — that is, from the “oxidation” of glucose derived from foods.

The idea that everyone should drink "eight glasses" of water a day is one of
those urban legends that never seems to go away; Notice that the major loss is
through simple breathing??. Individuals (such as many elderly) having reduced
kidney function produce more dilute urine, and must therefore take in more
water. And of course stress factors such as strenuous exercise, exposure to very
high temperatures, or diarrhea can greatly increase the need for water intake.
Consumption of overly large quantities of water can lead to electrolyte
imbalance resulting in water intoxication.
www.chem1.com/acad/sci/aboutwater.html
www1.lsbu.ac.uk/water/water_anomalies.html

Mikhail Lomonosov (1711–1765)FREEMASON [ protege of philosopher

Christian Wolff, a prominent figure of the German Enlightenment. & follower
of Robert boyle=freemason https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikhail_Lomonosov ]
had previously expressed similar ideas in 1748 and proved them in experiments;
others whose ideas pre-date the work of Lavoisier include Jean
Rey FREEMASON (1583–1645), Joseph Black FREEMASON(1728–1799),
and Henry Cavendish FREEMASON (1731–1810).

The total effect of the new nomenclature can be gauged by comparing the new
name "copper sulfate" with the old term "vitriol of Venus."

Antoine Lavoisier is commonly cited as a central contributor to the chemical

revolution.
 19

Lavoisier encountered much opposition ?? in trying to change the field,

especially from British phlogistic scientists. Joseph Priestley, Richard
Kirwan, James Keir, and William Nicholson, among others, argued that
quantification of substances did not imply conservation of mass.

His opposition, however, argued that precision in experimentation did not

imply precision in inferences and reasoning.

Many investigators had been experimenting with the combination of Henry

Cavendish's inflammable air, which Lavoisier termed hydrogen (Greek for
"water-former"), with dephlogisticated air (oxygen) by electrically sparking
mixtures of the gases. All of the researchers noted the production of water?, but
all interpreted the reaction in varying ways within the framework of the
phlogiston theory. In cooperation with mathematician Pierre Simon de Laplace,
Lavoisier synthesized water by burning jets of hydrogen and oxygen in a bell jar
over mercury.
He was essentially a theorist, and his great merit lay in his capacity to take over
experimental work that others had carried out—without always adequately
recognizing their claims. He completed the work of Black, Priestley and
Cavendish, and gave a correct explanation of their experiments.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antoine_Lavoisier FREEMASON
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Black FREEMASON
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Wilhelm_Scheele
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Priestley
PROOF ATOMS ARE A PSY OP HOAX ON THE GOYIM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LiATNQ-4sQg
http://www.knightstemplar.org/KnightTemplar/articles/fourmasonicelements.pd
f The death of alchemy has been symbolically represented by Antoine
Lavoisher who listed thirty-three elements classified as gases, metals, non-
metals, or earths in his 1789 dissertation entitled Elementary Treatise on
Chemistry (Donovan, 1996; Rupp, 2005). From this point, the number of
identified elements increased at a steady if not amazing rate (Rupp). It is
noteworthy to mention, however, that even today, the classical elements and
alchemy are used in astrology, esoteric thought, and several other occult
philosophies. THIRTY THREE = FREEMASON SYMBOL

It was Empedocles (494-435 BC???) who is accredited with combining the

theories of his predecessors and developing a four-prong theory of the
elements. In Thetrasomia or Doctrine of the Four Elements, Empedocles
postulated that all things were made up of various combinations of earth, air,
fire, and water.
 20

Within the Greek philosophy, the presence of a fifth element, ether, was
regularly discussed and debated. Aristotle ?? added a fifth element he called
“aether” later termed “quintessence.”

Alchemy “developed in close relation with metallurgy and medicine” within the
Islamic Arabian-Persian world Gerber was profoundly interested in alchemy,
and he believed that all metals were made up of a combination of sulfur and
mercury. Gerber’s sulfur-mercury theory was expanded by Al-Razi (850- 940
AD), a Persian physician, to include salt (Rupp, 2005). In the late Middle Ages
(12-14th centuries), alchemy was studied by such eminent personalities as
Albertus Magnus – Albert von Bollstadt (1193-1280), professor of philosophy
and theology at the Universities of Cologne and Paris and Arnaldus de
Villanova (1235-1313), rector of Montpellier University” (Tramer, Voltz,
Lahmani, & SzczepinskaTramer, 2007, p. S6).

In the 16th Century, the Greek theory of elements and the Arabian three
elements were combined. Paracelsus (Phillip von Hohenheim, 1493-1541)
determined that, though the Greek four were indeed the fundamental
components of all matter; earth, air, fire, and water in turn were composed of
the three Arabic “principles;” mercury, sulfur, and salt (Rupp, p. 23). The
classical elements composed of either four or five elements dominated
philosophic, scientific, esoteric, and mathematical thought from Empedocles
through Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Gerber, and Paracelsus, and their dominance
began to weaken??? in the middle of the 17th Century with the scientific???
research of Robert Boyle –FREEMASON . Boyle’s (2008) The Sceptical
Chymist signaled the end of the four elements’ dominance in science. For the
next one hundred years, the dominance of alchemy and the four elements over
Western society waned???. The death??? of alchemy has been symbolically
represented by Antoine Lavoisher who listed thirty-three elements classified as
gases, metals, non-metals, or earths in his 1789 dissertation entitled Elementary
Treatise on Chemistry (Donovan, 1996; Rupp, 2005). From this point, the
number of identified elements increased at a steady if not amazing rate (Rupp).
It is noteworthy to mention, however, that even today, the classical elements
and alchemy are used in astrology, esoteric thought, and several other occult
philosophies.

The Pythagoreans, those philosophers who followed the teaching of Pythagoras,

had a natural affection for numbers, and to them, the world of nature and
reality seemed to divide itself nicely into units of four. They observed four
elements, “four prime faculties, four societies, four seasons, four ages of man,
and four parts of living things” (Rupp, p. 12). It was the Pythagoreans who are
credited with developing four of the seven liberal arts and sciences, the
 21

quadrivium; arithmetic, geometry, astronomy, and music (Stahl, Johnson, &

Burge, 1991).
Hippocrates took this fascination with four and connected the four elements to
his four essential fluids of the human body (yellow bile, black bile, blood, and
phlegm). Ginsburgh (1995) asserted that the Hebrew people saw a
correspondence between the four classical elements and the letters of the
Tetragrammaton. In Ginsburgh’s view, water correlates with Yod, fire with
Heh, air with Vav, and earth with the final Heh. Bogdan (2007), Castells (2005),
and Ozaniec (2005) concur that there is a correlation between the name of God
and the four classical elements. According to some writers, the four classical
elements when corresponded with the Tetragrammaton may be further
associated with the four senses, four evangelists, four angels ruling over the
corners of the world, and the four triplicities (Castells (2005); Goldstein, 1990;
Labriola & Simmonds, 2000;). “A triplicity is a set of three zodiacal signs: there
are four triplicities in all, each of which is associated with one of the four
elements” (Goldstein, p. 1). Bogdan stresses that the illustration of this
connection is displayed more fully or clearly in the rituals of the Order of the
Golden Dawn than they are within Freemasonry. Kabalistic philosophy is
deeply rooted in the study of the Tetragrammaton. The Tetragrammaton and
Kabalistic philosophy are repeatedly seen within the degrees of the Scottish
Rite, including the craft degrees (Hutchens, 1995a; Hutchens, 1995b). Within
the American York Rite’s “higher” degrees is a very clear example of how
units of four were associated with each other. In the Royal Arch Degree, the
candidate is caused to pass through four veils, each representing one of the
principal tribes of Israel. The first veil represents the tribe of Dan and is
represented by a blue banner bearing the representation of an eagle. The second
veil represents the tribe of Rueben and is represented by a banner of purple
bearing the representation of a man. The third veil represents the tribe of
Ephraim and is represented by a scarlet banner bearing the representation of an
ox. The fourth veil represents the tribe of Judah and is represented by a banner
of white bearing the representation of a lion. According to Royal Arch and early
Christian tradition, each of the four veils is said to represent one of the four
Christian Gospels of John, Matthew, Luke, and Mark, respectively. The
representations of the eagle, man, ox, and lion are further described as
corresponding to four astrological symbols of the Zodiac: Scorpio, Aquarius,
Taurus, and Leo, respectively. In Morals and Dogma, Albert Pike (1956)
connects even more units of four with the four representations on the Royal
Arch’s banners while discussing the twenty-eighth degree of the Scottish Rite.
On page 791, Pike presents an illustration connecting the eagle with azoth and
air; the man with mercury and water; the ox with salt and the earth; and the lion
with sulfur and fire. Pike continues to explain how the Zohar further connects
each illustration on the banners with an angel: the lion with Michael; the ox
with Gabriel; the eagle with Uriel; and the man with Raphael.
 22

The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse are described in the last book of the New
Testament of the Bible, called the Book of Revelation of Jesus Christ to John of
Patmos, at 6:1-8.

Alchemy --The four classical elements are intimately related to the ancient
science of alchemy. The discipline, not unlike Freemasonry, is divided into two
denominations, material and spiritual or operative and speculative (Tramer,
Voltz, Lahmani, & Szczepinska-Tramer, 2007). Alchemy was very envogue
with the thinkers of the Renaissance (14th-17th centuries) but fell out ???of
popularity with the rise of the “rational and critical philosophy of the
enlightenment” mind (Tramer, Voltz, Lahmani, & Szczepinska-Tramer, p. S6).
It is not to be assumed however that alchemy instantaneously disappeared from
the social, political, and scientific scenes. Whereas the material practice of
alchemy sought to explain and manipulate the physical world, the spiritual
alchemist sought to use the terminology, science, and ideas of the material to
explain the psychological, spiritual, and sociological existence of man. Alchemy
was interested in transmuting one thing into another. Of course the most
widely known idea of alchemy is the search for a technique of converting base
metals into silver or gold; however, within the spiritual denomination of
alchemy there was a search to return man to a pure oneness with the Divine
Creator. Although the once prominent theories of alchemy lost ???position in
the open scientific world view, its spiritual half found refuge in the esoteric
beliefs of organizations such as Freemasonry and the Rosicrucian movement.
The traditional quest within alchemy was transmutation or change into another
substance or form (Von Franz, 1980). This quest in relationship to the four
elements can still be found within The Elemental Trials of Freemasonry. Before
going farther, it would be advantageous to explore what connections the framers
of the Craft had with alchemy and its practice. The beginnings of Freemasonry
are shrouded in mystery. At what point the operative Lodges transformed ???
into an organization accepting men of stature and prestige is blurred; however,
it is generally accepted that Elias Ashmole, Robert Moray, and Christopher
Wren were among the first to transcend the barriers and become speculative or
accepted Masons (Beresiner, 2004; Koltko-Rivera, 2007; MacNulty, 1998). It is
also noteworthy that all three of these men were founding members of the
Royal Society. The men in both RS & Freemasonry shared similar interests, two
of which were alchemy and the rapidly developing science of chemistry. Elias
Ashmole was born on the 23rd of May 1617 at Lichfield, Staffordshire England
(Beresiner, 2004). Ashmole was made a Freemason in 1646 within the lodge at
Warrington (Koltko-Rivera, 2007). From an early age, Ashmole found a fond
interest in esoteric teachings. He had a passion for botany, astronomy, and
alchemy. He became fast friends with William Backhouse, a noted alchemist,
and this relationship was so strong that, according to Koltko-Rivera, Ashmole
 23

became the alchemical successor to Backhouse. Ashmole also had an interest in

Rosicrucianism; however, there seems to be no record of him ever being a
participant in Rosicrucian activities. Ashmole published several works with
esoteric and alchemic connotations including Fasciculus Chemicus, Theatrum
Chemicum Brittannicum, and The Way of Bliss (Beresiner; Koltko-Rivera;
MacNulty, 1998). Robert Moray was born March 6, 1609. He was initiated into
Masonry in 1641 at the Lodge in Edinburgh. Moray was a lover of hermetic
philosophy and alchemy, and he was the patron of Thomas Vaughn, an active
alchemist (MacNulty, 1998; McGregor, 2005). Christopher Wren was born
October 20, 1632 (McGregor, 2005). Wren was initiated into Freemasonry in
May of 1691 as evidenced by John Aubray’s Naturell Historie of Wiltshire.
Records in the Royal Society archives state Bro. Wren was adopted into the
Fraternity of Accepted Masons on May 18, 1691. "Records of the Lodge
Original, No. 1, now the Lodge of Antiquity No. 2" mention him as being
Master of the lodge. In all he left 50 churches, and many buildings at Oxford
and Cambridge to remind us of his legacy. Master: Lodge of Antiquity No. 2
His interests in intellectual endeavors, however, are unquestionable. Wren was
raised in an Anglican family that leaned towards the Royalist agenda during the
civil unrest in England. He was educated at an early age by his father and
Reverend William Shepherd. He attended Westminster School for several
years. Following a change in prosperity, the Wrens resided with William
Holder. It was here that Wren was exposed to William Scarburgh, a physician.
Scarburgh was a member of a small group of thinkers who met weekly to
discuss such topics as alchemy, physics, astronomy, statics, and the like. Wren
was allowed to attend many of these meetings. Christopher Wren was among
the first twelve founding members of the Royal Society and served as president
for several years (McGregor, 2005).

The Elemental Trials as Illustrations of Transmutation

“According to Aristotle???, the prima material combines with the four qualities
of coldness, dryness, heat, and moisture to develop into the four elements. He
believed that manipulating these qualities would change their elemental
composition, resulting in transmutation”

(Vorhand-Ariel, 1998, p. 110). Within alchemy, it was believed that the

elements could be manipulated in order to produce a mystical substance or the
philosopher’s stone. This belief in manipulating what was found in nature into
a supernatural substance, transmutation, transposed itself into the philosophy of
Rosicrucianism and Freemasonry. Nowhere within all of Freemasonry is this
more clearly evident than in the elemental trials.

Earth---- Within the American York Rite, it is taught that “our Mother Earth
alone, of all the elements, has never proved unfriendly to man.” The ritual
 24

further admonishes us that “from the earth we came, and to it we must

shortly return.” The element of earth represents man’s alpha and omega, his
beginning and his end. Man’s body was molded together with the dust of the
earth and water. His mortal temple was an earthen clay vessel into which God
breathed air through his nostrils to transmute him into a living soul. The first
living man was Adam who is recognized within Masonic tradition and myth as
being the first Freemason. The name Adam comes from adamah, meaning
earth or ground (Mackey, 1927; Vorhand-Ariel, 1998). It may be of interest to
mention here that according to Jewish law, it is unlawful for a corpse to be
cremated. One explanation for this edict is that a body that is returned to the
earth “is capable of bringing forth new life;” whereas, a body that is turned to
ash through burning by fire represents complete destruction (Kaplan, 1990, p.
149). The Jewish religion and Freemasonry both teach that man is an eternal
being that awaits resurrection after death. It is therefore proper that man’s body
be laid under the solemn clods of clay as a symbol of his awaiting resurrection
and return to the endless cycle of life. It is appropriate that the Masonic rituals
of elemental trials begin with the candidate being placed deep within the earth.
It may be interpreted as a symbol of his beginnings. When the profane candidate
leaves the Chamber of Reflection, he is born anew and prepared to receive
instruction as a tabula rasa or blank slate (Zeldis, 2008).

Air -----The word wind is intimately related to the word spirit. It has already
been mentioned that it was breath that made man a living soul. God breathed air
into man’s nostrils to make him a free moral agent, made in the likeness of the
Godhead, Father, Son, and Holy Ghost. The Arabic word “ruch” and the
Hebrew word “ruach” are words meaning both soul and wind (Kaplan, 1990;
VorhandAriel, 1998). Jung (1989) asserted that it was only natural for man to
associate air with the soul. For life begins with a baby’s first gasp for breath
and ends with a man’s last struggle to breathe. When a man breathes his last
breath and the air leaves his body, his soul vacates the carnal clay vessel and
transmutes to eternal reward or damnation.

Water -------The second journey within Pike’s ritual is the trial by water. In
Western, alchemist, and Jewish thought, water has a deep rooted connection
with creation, birth, and renewal (Rupp, 2005; Vorhand-Ariel, 1998). The first
two elements mentioned within the Christian and Jewish Bible are earth and
water. In modern science, it is taught that life on earth began within the
primordial ooze of the ancient oceans. The process of a mother delivering a
baby is signaled by the breaking of her water. Through a study of ancient
civilizations, it is found that the earliest societies developed on the banks of the
fertile rivers of life; the Tigris, the Euphrates, the Nile, the Indus, and the
Yellow Rivers; thus it might be suggested that water has always been a source
of life and fertility to the human race (Kaplan, 1990; Vorhand-Ariel, 1998).
 25

Water has played a vital part in the rituals of the world’s major religions.
Although much of the Christian world views baptism and ceremonial immersion
as a rite isolated within their practice, mikvah is a ritual bath practiced in
Judaism (Vorhand-Ariel). The Holy Scriptures of the Jews require followers to
participate in a ceremonial immersion in order to purify themselves. Causes for
such a requirement are varied but include women after childbirth or menstrual
cycles, converts to Judaism, and the Cohen Gadol or High Priest before
performing a ceremony representing the people (Vorhand-Ariel). Within the
Muslim religion, practitioners are required to go through purification by water
before prayer. It is thereby a safe assertion that the washing of the body in water
is an ancient symbol of the purification of the immortal soul and the carnal
vessel. Its use within the Craft is no different. The alchemist used water as a
sign of transmutation and purification. Before setting to work, the alchemist
prepared his tools and vessels by immersing and washing them in a bath of
water (Vorhand-Ariel). Perhaps it is only fitting for the first degree of
Freemasonry to purify and prepare a candidate for the ancient mysteries within
a symbolic water baptism.

Fire ------ To the ancient Hebrews and to alchemists, fire was the most active of
the elements. It was fire that served as a catalyst. According to Vorhand-Ariel
(1998), “Heraclitus regarded fire as an agent of transmutation and as a symbol
of renewal, representing light, spirit, the sun, radiance, and purification” (p.
111). The alchemists used fire as well as water as a source of purifying their
tools. The alchemist and metallurgist both used fire to refine metals and make
them pure. It separates the base from the precious metal (Tramer, Volts,
Lahmani, & Szczepinska-Tramer, 2007). Fire was used by them to transform a
crude convoluted mixture into a separated collection of base and precious
metals. “The Zohar says that the flaming sword (referred in Genesis as being
placed east of the Garden of Eden) symbolizes the trials with which God
overwhelms man that he may be purified and restored to the way of goodness”
(Vorhand-Ariel, 1998, p. 112). It might be mentioned here that the tiler’s sword
was traditionally wavy in shape to represent the sword placed in the Garden of
Eden (Lawrence, 1999; Mackey, 1927). As aforementioned, fire is a symbol of
renewal and has been since time immemorial. Perhaps one of the best images of
this is the traditional phoenix. The phoenix is a mythical bird that after an
extensive life combusts into flames and is reborn from its own ashes. In Thus
Spake Zarathustra, Nietzsch (2003) wrote, “You must be willing to burn in
your own flame: how could you become new unless you had first become
ashes?” (p. 49). The ancients implemented a trial by fire perhaps similar to
Pike’s variation of the Entered Apprentice degree. Perhaps it is a reminder to
the neophyte that he must set aside or destroy his old image of life and self to
receive the teachings of Freemasonry and become a new and better creature.
 26

In the study of the elements, the topic of alchemy repeatedly revealed itself. It
has been illustrated how the discipline of alchemy dominated the religious,
political, scientific, and social aspects of human existence. The early speculative
Freemasons came from the ages of the Renaissance and the Enlightenment. It is
without question that these patriarchs of the Craft were knowledgeable in both
denominations of alchemy and their relationship with the four classical
elements. It is proposed, and hopefully supported that sporadic mentioning of
the four elements within the York Rite system and the blatant use of the
elements within the rites of continental Europe are direct decendents from the
reign of alchemy in pre-Enlightenment Europe. The early framers of the Craft
during the Renaissance probably drafted the rituals to include the philosophies
of spiritual alchemy that aligned with the spiritual needs and goals of the
fledgling organization of Speculative Freemasonry.

Elements --Water Fire Earth Wind/Air

Zodiac --Aquarius Leo Taurus Scorpio
Gospels --Matthew Mark Luke John
Daniel’s Vision --Man Lion Ox/Bull Eagle
Principal Tribes --Reuben Judah Ephraim Dan
Angels --Raphael Michael Gabriel Uriel
Alchemy-- Mercury Sulfur Salt Azoth
Greek Gods-- Neptune Vulcan Juno Jupiter
Hippocrates’ Four Humours-- Phlegm Yellow Bile Black Bile Blood
Platonic Shapes --Icosahedron Tetrahedron Cube Octahedron
Colors (Pike)-- White Red Black Blue

Ambelain, R. (2006). Freemasonry in Olden Times: Ceremonies and Rituals

from the Rites of Mizraim and Memphis. Adventures in Spirit Series/Robert
Laffont, Translated by Piers A. Vaughan. Barbour, P. P. (1946).
“The transmission of esoteric knowledge and the origins of modern
Freemasonry: Was Macky right?”. Heredom, Volume 15. Washington, D.C.:
The Scottish Rite Research Society. Labriola, A. C. & Simmonds, J. D. (2000).
Milton Studies. University of Pittsburg Press: Pittsburgh, PA. Laurie, A. (1929).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isaac_Newton%27s_occult_studies
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Cavendish

Freemasonry For Beginners -

https://books.google.co.in/books?isbn=1939994578 Robert Lomas - 2017 -
Newton's understanding had derived in large part from his exposure to
Masonic symbolism. The innate power of these symbols is seen in the way
Masonic knowledge affected the thinking of others when Newton shared it.
 27

While the dispute between the German philosopher Gottfried Leibniz and Isaac
Newton over who ...

Leibniz, Mysticism and Religion -

https://books.google.co.in/books?isbn=9401590524 A.P. Coudert, R.H. Popkin,
G.M. Weiner – 2013

Treason In America: From Aaron Burr To Averell Harriman

https://books.google.co.in/books?id=dgmDCgAAQBAJ Anton Chaitkin - 2015
- This vast conspiracy brought together, under Franklin's leadership, the
surviving networks earlier associated with John Milton of England, Richelieu,
Mazarin, and Colbert of France, and of Gottfried Leibniz. The network of
Franklin's conspiracy extended, outside the future United States itself, from
Leibniz's Petrograd ...

[[ The magnetic flow of the Atom - For all the dogmatics story there is a
quantum physics counterpart...

Hellenistic Christian Gnostics with Quantum physics: "God takes a rib out of
Adam and Makes Eve, the “Rib” is part of Adam like an Electron a part of the
Atom If we take an electron from Atom we cause a new action of creation, the
dogma story is saying that all life began with the splitting of the Atom/Adam.
The part of Adam and Eve is known as Ionic boning, the scientific process is
called Ionic Bonding. Atoms that have gained or lost electrons are called ions.
Because each electron has a negative charge, the gain of electrons creates a
negative ion and the loss of electrons creates a positive ion. In short if you take
and electron out of (or from) an Atom it creates a positive Ion; If you add (or
increase) an electron into an Atom it creates a negative Ion. The attraction
between negative and positive ions results in strong bonds called ionic bonds
that hold the ions together; the key pattern is “positive & negative”, “light &
dark”, and “female & male”. To form sodium chloride an electron from a
sodium atom is transferred to a chlorine atom; thus something new is formed." ~
From Bill Donahue

Red or Fission moving the Adam\atom outward for the negative ION is
dogmatically called Lilith

Blue or Fusion moving the Adam/Atom inward for the positive ION is
dogmatically Eve ]]
 28

https://www.iep.utm.edu/leib-met/
http://purposelyhoodwinked.blogspot.in/2013/05/newtonianism-freemasonry-
note-to-my.html http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/biography/Leibniz.html

Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (1646-1716). Leibniz had been Secretary of the

Rosicrucian Society in Nuremberg in 1716. Not only did he serve the
Brunswick family loyally as their historian; he was also a lawyer and served
them as a judge and administrator. Thus Leibniz, Secretary of the Rosicrucian
Society, not only brought the Hanovers to the throne of England, with him came
the fraternity known as the Freemasons.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=41367.0
A Factual History of Freemasons and Banking by Bitrebel

The Early History of Freemasonry & the Founding of the Bank of England

The Glorious Revolution is a historical event which is little noted in the

United States. It refers, not to our own successful American Revolution, but to
the even more momentous revolution of 1688 in England. No historian has
noted that the history of the world since 1688 has been directed by the
consequences of the Glorious Revolution, which not only ended the attempts for
the Vatican to recover its extensive land holdings in England which had been
seized by King Henry the Eighth, but also resulted in the establishment of the
Bank of England and it’s espionage service, Great Britain’s notorious SIS, the
Secret Intelligence Service, which in turn set up our own Central Intelligence
Agency, under the name of the Office of Strategic Services, during WWII.
The Glorious Revolution not only made possible the chartering of the Bank of
England, which was to become the world’s most influential central bank; it also
opened the door for the subsequent usurping ??of the English Crown by the
Illuminati in 1714, when George I, Duke of Hannover, ascended to the throne of
England. Since that date, the English monarchy has been prominent in the world
machinations of the Freemason movement.
Immediately following the Glorious Revolution, in 1689, William of Orange
was now King William III of England and signed a Declaration of Rights on
February 13, 1689, which ended the king’s power to suspend the deliberation of
Parliament or to dispense with its laws, which had been the goal of Sir Edward
Coke’s mission. Coke’s Petition of Right had now become the law of the land.
England has been a constitutional monarchy ever since. The official release of
the British Information Service, the propaganda arm of England, states that “the
United Kingdom is a parliamentary democracy with a limited constitutional
monarchy. Government is carried on by Her Majesty’s Government in the name
of the Queen, who reigns but does not rule. The Queen is an integral part of
parliament.”
The Declaration of Rights of 1689 was followed by an even more powerful
 29

contract between the English monarchy and the people of England, the Act of
Succession of 1701. This act specifically barred the Stuarts from ever again
claiming the throne. The Act further placed the Hanover line of Germany,
which was waiting in the wings, in the direct line of succession. It specified
that all future monarchs must belong to the Anglican Church, the Church of
England. It specifically barred Catholics from the throne. Later monarchs
received the title of head of the Church of England. Other clauses of this Act
secured parliamentary supremacy by requiring that the monarch must go to
Parliament each year and request the annual stipend. The royal household now
existed at the pleasure of Parliament, which controlled it’s purse strings.
In 1694, King William III chartered the Bank of England. Since that date,
there has never been another revolution in England. A history of civil wars and
revolutions against the throne had come to an end. A privately owned central
bank, the bank of England, now controlled the issuance of money, which had
formerly been a royal prerogative. The throne’s goodwill was secured by the
assignment of a large number of shares to the royal family.
The sudden access to funds provided by the Bank of England ushered in a
great flowering of English culture and international prestige. The bank’s
monetary manipulations created enormous fortunes for its shareholders, and
great estates were built throughout the countryside. The fortunate few who had
invited William to take the English throne, and who had subsequently been
invited to become charter subscribers to the Bank for 10,000 pounds each (the
equivalent of 10 Million dollars in today’s currency), made certain the success
of the Glorious Revolution.
The Hanover family had spent some twenty years diligently preparing their
claim to the throne of England. Their official genealogist and historian was one
of the most well known scholars in Europe, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (1646-
1716). Leibniz had been Secretary of the Rosicrucian Society in Nuremberg in
1716. Not only did he serve the Brunswick family loyally as their historian; he
was also a lawyer and served them as a judge and administrator. His massive
work, Codex Juris Gentium Diplomaticus Hannoverae, not only traced the
descent from Henry the Lion, who had married into the British royal family; it
also documented the later developments. Elizabeth, one of King James I’s
Protestant daughters, had married Frederick the Fifth, the Elector of Palatine.
Their daughter, Sophie, married Ernest Augustus, the first Elector of Hanover.
Although Sophia was not a claimant to the English throne, having died before
Queen Anne, her son, who was now Elector of Hanover, was able to overcome
the other claimants by the sheer weight of Leibniz’s tremendous amount of
research. Thus Leibniz, Secretary of the Rosicrucian Society, not only brought
the Hanovers to the throne of England, with him came the fraternity
known as the Freemasons.

The Glorious Revolution unleashed many currents in history which remain

 30

strong today. The European battle between the rival forces of Protestant and
Catholic was exacerbated by the ascension of William of Orange in 1688. For
more than 100 years, the historic enemies, England and France, had been at
peace. William changed this arrangement, by joining the League of Augsburg
against France, which resulted in seven wars between England and France
between 1689 and 1815.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Alliance_(League_of_Augsburg) The
Alliance of France with the rebelling American colonists was but one minor
aspect of this longstanding struggle. William’s participation in the League of
Augsburg was but another aspect of the growing conspiratorial work of the
Masons. The League was essentially a Masonic foreign policy apparatus which
was determined to destroy the traditional balance of power between the reigning
monarchies of Europe, finally displacing them by setting up their own New
World order.
In effect, Leibniz and his fellow intellectuals, with the ascent of George I in
1714 to the throne of England, became the secret powers behind the throne. In
1717, it was announced that Freemasonry was officially revived in England.
From this base of power, Lord Sackville was dispatched to Italy in 1733 to set
up Freemason lodges there, in 1735, Lord Derwentwater was sent to Paris to
organize a Grand Lodge. The result was the destruction of the monarchy in
those nations. Through the secret forces which led the revolution, England was
finally able to dispatch its great rival, France, and to end her claims to world
power. The new order was announced at the Congress of Vienna in 1815, when
the triumphant Masons, led by the banking power of the Rothschilds, dictated
their terms, not only to France, but to the other nations of Europe. Financed by
the money power of the Bank of England, enforced by the British Navy and the
worldwide intrigues of the Secret Intelligence Service, the Masons were well on
their way to fulfilling their historic goals.
Under the Hanovers, the Freemasons were able to step up their own monopoly
of secret societies in England. On the 12th of July, 1798, an Act was passed in
Great Britain, known as the Sedition Act, for the Suppression of Secret
Societies. In his definitive work, “The Brotherhood, The Secret World of the
Freemasons”, Stephen Knight complains that the Masons have never complied
with the stringent requirements for listing their members under this Act.
However, he seems unaware that the act specifically exempts the Freemasons
from compliance. It’s language reads, “And whereas certain societies have long
been accustomed to be holden in this kingdom, under the denomination of
Lodges of Freemasonry, the meetings whereof have been in great measure
directed to charitable purposes; be it therefore enacted, that nothing in this Act
shall extend to the meetings of any such Society or Lodge which, shall, before
the passing of this Act, have been usually holden under the said denomination,
and in conformity to the rules prevailing among the said Societies of
Freemasons.” In effect , this Act banned all secret societies except
 31

Freemasons.
Such a powerful ban reflected the active participation of the now reigning
family of England, the Hanovers, in the lodges.
Grand Masters of the Freemason Grand Lodge of England
* From 1782-1790, the Grand Master of England was His Royal Highness
Henry Frederick, Duke of Cumberland;
* From 1791-1812, His Royal Highness George, Prince of Wales, who
subsequently became King George IV;
* From 1812-1842, His Royal Highness Augustus Frederick, Duke of Sussex,
son of King George III;
(The Duke of Sussex united the rival lodges, the Ancient and the Modern,
into a single, potent force.)
* Several Earls of Strathmore have been Grand Masters of England. A
Strathmore married the Duke of York, later King George V, and is now Queen
Mother of England.

The Rothschilds, International Banking and Fiat Currency

Although Meyer Amschel Rothschild himself never became a Freemason to
further his financial empire, his sons did, as did his head clerk, Sigmund
Geisenheimer. Rabbi Marvin Antelman in ‘To Eliminate the Opiate’ (1974),
reports that Geisenheimer had wide ranging Masonic contacts that crisscrossed
Europe.

…”The Rothchilds utilized the services of Sigmund Geisenheimer, their head

clerk, who in turn was aided by Itzig of Berlin, the Illuminati of the Toleranz
Lodge and the Parisian Grand Orient Lodge. Geisenheimer was a member of
the Mayence Masonic Illuminati Lodge , and was the founder of the Frankfurt
Judenloge…” At a later date, the Rothschilds joined the lodge. Solomon
Meyer Rothschild (1744-1855) was a member for a short while before moving
to Vienna.
Since the days of Meyer Rothschild, international banking and the Masonic
oligarchy have been inseparable, cooperating in their ever expanding financial
control of nations.
Nathan and his brother James were the most successful of the Rothschild
sons, and their success is in part attributable to their membership in the lodge.
For instance, when James arrived in Paris to begin his career, he immediate
joined French Grand Lodge Freemasonry, quickly rising to the 33rd degree of
the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of the French Supreme Council.
Nathan, the most financially adept son, upheld the tradition of insider trading
established by his father by joining the Lodge of Emulation in London on Oct.
4, 1802. Not only did the lodge promote Nathan’s smuggling operation to
service the continental armies of his royal English patrons during Napoleon’s
 32

Continental blockade, it is also suspected that the lodge assisted him in his bid
to control the Bank of England.
Because of Nathan Rothschild’s financial acumen, London became the
banking headquarters of the house of Rothschild. All descendants of this Jewish
clan have since been attached to Gentile English Freemasonry, for no
exclusively Jewish lodges exist in England. And to this day, no Englishman has
ever worked for N.M. Rothschild and Sons, at St. Swithin’s Lane, unless first
proving his ability to keep secrets by joining English Freemasonry. According
to British investigative journalist Martin Short in ‘Inside the Brotherhood’
(1989), unless you are a Mason, you do not work for London banks. The
managing director of the Rothschild bank, for example, is Freemason Michael
Richardson, who for 5 years (1982-1987) was chairman of the board of the
Royal Masonic
Hospital. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Richardson_(investment_banke
r)
. The Warburg brothers, Max, Felix and Paul, were Grand Orient Masons.
Nevertheless, Felix’s father in law, Jacob Schiff, also a Grand Orient Mason,
was sent to the United States after our Civil War to buy into the existing
banking firm, Kuhn, Loeb & Co. At Schiff’s side was Paul Warburg.
Meanwhile, the British House of Rothschild funded J.P. Morgan and John D.
Rockefeller to handle its banking interests in America. By 1913, with the
passage of the Federal Reserve Act, the Rothschilds and the Warburgs were in
complete control of usa’s money supply. This Act transferred the control of
money supply from Congress to the Federal Reserve Bank—a central bank not
owned by federal government, but owned by private stockholders who were
European and British Masons bent on directing American politics for their own
profit.
The power of the banks to control destinies of nations was leaked to the press
after a stockholders meeting of the Midland Bank of London, England, in 1924.
As all banks in London, the Midland Bank has its own Masonic lodge – the
Holden Lodge No. 2946. The speaker at the podium of Midland’s January 1924
stockholder’s meeting was Freemason Reginald McKenna, Midland’s chairman
of the board and past chancellor of the Exchequer of England from 1915 to
1916. His statement to the stockholders was and is testimony to the financial
hold Masonic bankers have on governments to the detriment of the people:
“I am afraid the ordinary citizen will not like to be told that the banks can, and
do, create money…And they who control credit of the nation direct the policy
of Governments and hold in the hollow of their hands the destiny of the
people.”

The Stock Market Crash of 1929 & the Great Depression

The Great Depression, which began with the stock market crash in 1929, was
created by the Fed. For over a century, British bankers had manipulated
 33

financial cycles to create alternate periods of inflation and deflation in order

to increase their wealth.
A few concerned congressmen in 1928 scheduled hearings on stabilizing the
dollar. At the hearings evidence was disclosed that in 1927, the Federal Reserve
Board and heads of the European central banks, had planned, at a secret
luncheon, a major stock market crash. However, the majority of congressmen
were Masons (69% of the House and 63% of the Senate), so no action was taken
against the fed. Calvin Coolidge was then President, was so impressed with
them that his entire cabinet were Masons. https://www.history.com/this-day-in-
history/washington-receives-highest-freemason-rank
https://mysteryoftheiniquity.com/2011/05/08/freemason-presidents/ Among
them, serving as his secretary of the treasury, was Royal Arch Mason Andrew
Mellon, president of Mellon National bank of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. On Feb.
6, 1929, British Freemason Montague Norman, Governor of the Bank of
England, came to Washington to confer with Andrew Mellon. Immediately after
the meeting, the Federal Reserve Board reversed its easy-money policy and
began to raise the discount rate. In this meeting with Mellon, British
Freemasonry was deliberately directing a course that would bring financial
disaster and terrible hardship upon the entire nation.
Oct. 24, 1929, the money balloon – which had been constantly inflated by the
fed for nearly seven years – exploded. The new president, republican Herbert
Hoover, a Mason, his Treasury Secretary was the same Royal Arch Mason
appointed by his predecessor
On March 1, 1933, 32nd degree Freemason Franklin D. Roosevelt became the
32nd President of the United States of America. His treasury secretary was 33rd
degree Freemason Henry Morganthau.
Franklin Roosevelt adopted two banking policies, called the Banking Act of
1933, and the Banking Act of 1935, that gave British Masonic bankers control
of gold supply. The first would take our currency off the gold backed dollars;
the second would permit the fed to own the gold confiscated from the citizens.
Both acts increased the revenue of the Fed by over $100 Million. On April 5,
1933, after one month in office, Roosevelt issued an executive order requiring
American citizens to surrender gold coins, gold bullion and gold certificates –
not to the nearest United States mint or depository, but to the nearest privately
owned Federal Reserve Bank. The Fed redeemed the gold for $20.67 an ounce.
After the citizens gold was confiscated, the U.S. government increased the value
of gold to $35.00 an ounce.
The primary industry of Great Britain was, and still is, the drug industry,
Second to English Freemasonry’s drug industry is its banking industry. One
industry cannot survive without the other.
Information uncovered by Charles Higham, and published in the book, ‘Trading
with the Enemy’ (1983), states that the BIS “was to be a money funnel for
American and British funds to flow into Hitler’s coffers and to help Hitler build
 34

up his war machine”.

This is a shocking claim to make, but stockholders in the Bank for
International Settlements did share something in common. The major
stockholder in the BIS was the Bank of England – whose major stockholder, in
turn, was the House of Rothschild, which controlled finances for the Round
Table groups. Other owners included the Morgan-affiliated First National Bank
of New York, the Reichsbank of Germany, the Bank of Italy, the Bank of
France, and other central banks. Many of the individuals who were associated
with the BIS and named by Higham in his book were either known Masons
and/or members of the Round Table groups. Moreover, Hjalmar Schacht,
Hitler’s Minister of Economics and president of the Reichsbank, was a closet
English Freemason, who urged British bankers to establish the BIS to fund
Hitler’s war. In fact, part of the Bank’s charter, and assented to by the
respective governments involved in the BIS establishment, was that the BIS
should be immune from seizure, closure, or censure, whether or not its owners
were at war.

http://www.larouchepub.com/eiw/public/1987/eirv14n29-19870724/eirv14n29-
19870724_054-house_of_windsors_masonic_cult_s.pdf
www.energyenhancement.org/Satanic-Secret-Agents-Aristotle-Contarini-
Pomponazzi-and-Giorgi-Sarpi-Galileo-and-Kepler-Conti-Newton-and-Leibniz-
The-Satanic-Corruption-of-Science-by-the-Satanic-Slave-Trading-Drug-
Running-Bankster-run-Venetian-Empire.htm
https://ore.exeter.ac.uk/repository/bitstream/handle/10036/2999/BermanR.pdf?s
equence=2 www.freemasons-freemasonry.com/masonic_ladder.html
www.conspiracyarchive.com

Franklin's 'Lunar Society' And the Industrial Revolution by Marcia Merry

Baker

A new book is welcome about the "Lunar Society"-the circle of great figures
(Boulton, Watt, Wedgwood, Priestley, et al.) and great works (steam power,
canals, factories), centered in the British Midlands during the decades from the
1760's through 1800 (the exact period of the successful American Revolution),
whose names are associated with the advent of the Industrial Revolution. The
Lunar Men gives extensive biographies, detailed histories by topic (e.g., chapter
headings-"Steam," "They Build Canals," "Ingenious Philosophers," etc.) and
even a five-page chronology of the Eighteenth century, 50 pages of notes and
sources, a detailed index, and 144 illustrations. But, what the new book
leaves out although it is still enjoyable to "read into"-is the crucial history and
strategic context of the "Lunatics," as Erasmus Darwin fondly self-described
them.
 35

Namely, that the Lunar circle of creative personalities, centered in Birmingham,

was interconnected with international networks led by Benjamin Franklin, and
going back to Gottfried Leibniz
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gottfried_Wilhelm_Leibniz , which were
deliberately and consciously committed to scientific and technological advance
to promote the development of nations, on behalf of the common good. This
was an explicit goal, involving international collaboration of all kinds, through
visits, letters, publishing, political battles, espionage, and so forth. In other
words, the "Lunar Men" were not just a bunch of gifted, curious, lucky locals.
They were nation builders by vocation, and highly successful in their work at
advancing science and economic progress, and backing and befriending the
American Revolution on behalf of all peoples. In turn, what is underscored by
appreciating this interconnected history of the Lunar Society and the extended
FrankliniLeibniz networks is, that the conventional explanations for the origins
of the Industrial Revolution, are myths and falsehoods. The usual idea is that
"capitalists"-defined as those with funds (often, with a so-called "Calvinist
ethic"), apply technology, centralize production into factory systems, and
increase output. The uncontrolled outcome is guided by the Invisible Hand of
free-trade imperialists of the Adam Smith variety. In the course of it all, terrible
social ills inevitably result. Karl Marx presents the famous version of this
imputed process in his 1 848 Communist Manifesto. Then there is the more
academic version by Oxford professor Arnold Toynbee (uncle of the well-
known historian Arnold J. Toynbee FREEMASON ), who is credited with
popularizing the concept in his Lectures on the Industrial Revolution, 1884.
These two dismal constructs are thoroughly debunked in a 1988 monograph
by historian Anton Chaitkin, titled, "The Secret History of the Industrial
Revolution. " Dr. William Small. A Scottish doctor who taught at William and
Mary College in Virginia (with Thomas Jefferson as a pupil), Small returned to
Britain, and in May 1 765, aged 30, arrived on Boulton's doorstep in Soho, with
a letter of introduction from Franklin. Small became a linchpin in the Lunar
Society, and was also critical in furthering the steam engine and other projects,
as a partner in the manufacturing firm of Small, Boulton & Watt. The impact of
these persons and the Lunar Society was vast, both in Britain and the new
United States, as well as internationally. Franklin, born in Boston in 1706, was
a direct heir to the Tudor Renaissance and Leibniz tradition, thanks most
directly to the influence of Boston's Cotton Mather (1663-1728). Uglow
recounts Franklin's 1 771 visit to Birmingham in May, where he spent time with
Erasmus Darwin, discussing phonetics, chemistry, and making pond-life
excursions. Franklin encouraged and directed Joseph Priestley at every turn. In
1 764, Franklin met in London with Dr. William Small, the Scots physician,
whom Franklin had known in America. It was Franklin who "deployed" Small
to go to Birmingham, which he did in 1 765, becoming physician, confidant,
and unofficial secretary to Matthew Boulton. In an indication that she has an
 36

inkling of the Society's real history, Uglow says of this in her notes: "Sending
envoys and setting up cells was an acknowledged aspect of Franklin's
proselytizing technique." Franklin's introduction of the Leibniz advocate, the
German, Rudolph Eric Raspe, into the Lunar Society circle, most dramatically
shows the deliberate "proselytizing" involved. In 1 766, while on tour on the
Continent, Franklin made very important contact with those directly involved in
restoring Leibniz. In Hanover, he met Raspe . In a mention of the Philosophical
Club, founded in London by Benjamin Franklin and friends, Uglow lists
members in 1 775 as including Lunar Men John Whitehurst, Thomas Day, and
others, and also, "their colourful new friend Raspe, geologist, gem expert,
probable spy and anonymous author of The Adventures of Baron Munchausen."
Uglow has only one other, perfunctory mention of Raspe in her book. But, in
fact, Raspe worked with Boulton for the last dozen years of his life, beginning
no later than November 1 782.

[[ In the fall of 1727 Benjamin Franklin and a group of friends founded the
Junto Club also known as the Leather Apron Club. The 12 members. A branch
of the Junto Cub was the American Philosophical Society , created in 1743 and
which still exists. .The Junto was a launching pad for many public projects. Out
of the meetings came proposals for the creation of the first lending library, the
Union Fire Company, the University of Pennsylvania, volunteer militia,
Pennsylvania Hospital among other public project. Erasmus Darwin was
elected to the American Philosophical Society. Franklin was influenced by
two predecessor organizations in particular. One was an English group called
the "Dry Club," which had philosopher John Locke, William Popple, and
Benjamin Furly among its members during the 1690s (and was itself partially
inspired by Furly's "heretics of the Lantern" society). The other important
predecessors were the "neighborhood benefit societies" and "reforming
societies" proposed in Massachusetts by Cotton Mather- spy. ]] [[ A very
famous Jewish Mason, born in Boston to descendants of the Puritan tradition is
Benjamin Franklin.== As an example, seven of 10 nucleus members of the
Royal Society were Puritans. In the year 1663 sixty-two percent of the members
of the Royal Society were similarly identified.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puritans === His father and mother were Josiah
and Abiah Franklin. Benjamin Franklin contributed to the Mikveh Israel Jewish
congregation in Philadelphia. But Franklin did not practice Judaism. He did
practice the occult, and things that would be weird to Christians. He became the
head of the very occultic Grand Orient Freemasons when he was in France.
Franklin's life was surrounded by Freemasons. Franklin's role in the
establishment and promotion of Freemasonry is overwhelming. The
Masonic Lodge played such a big role in Franklin's life, and yet Franklin
never even hints about Freemasonry in his autobiography. The editor of his
autobiography points out that Franklin tried to portray an unreal persona in his
 37

autobiography, but one that Franklin felt people would want to emulate.58 If
Masonry is so virtuous, one wonders why it plays no role in his autobiography
which was written on purpose to create an image worthy of emulation.
Benjamin Franklin was the founder of the American Philosophical Society.59
He was also a Rosicrucian.60 In Feb. 1730, it appears he was initiated into St.
John's Lodge of Philadelphia.61 And in 1727, he started the secret revolutionary
political society called the Leather Apron Club which changed its name in 1731
to Junto, and took on the appearance of being a literary society.62 The same
year that this "literary" society changed its name, the St. John's Masonic Lodge
that Franklin belonged to got in touch with the Grand Lodge of London whose
Grand Master the Duke of Norfolk appointed Daniel Coxe. Daniel Coxe
advised the Masons when he arrived of a plan for the federation of the
colonies.63 In 1754, while deputy Grand Master, Franklin unveiled at Albany,
NY to his brother Masons his plan to unite all the colonies under one
government.64 Albany was the site of one the earliest Scottish Rite's Lodge of
Perfection. ====== As part of your continuing research, please read "Wise as
Serpents.." The fact that Springmeier regarded Franklin as Jewish is significant
enough. But I agree, he should have provided more evidence of ethnicity.
Sabbatean Jews disguised their identity and their loyalties. Franklin was the
head of the Jewish dominated Grand Orient Lodge of Paris. The book outing
him as a Jew was by a prominent Mason and Jew. It has been suppressed. =
Henry https://www.henrymakow.com/benjamin_franklin-_mason_and_j.html
http://freemasoninformation.com/2015/01/illustrious-brother-ben-franklin-and-
freemasonry/ www.masonicdictionary.com/franklin.html

Lunar Society collaborators launched the Industrial Revolution in England.:

Erasmus Darwin, Joseph Priestley, James Watt.

Charles Darwin on Evolution NWO eugenetica Population Control Eugenics

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bZ2nLAoC9H4
Darwin And Eugenics https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TmahZ18-6wc
Eugenics https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7eH7Jgtctfg
EUGENICS: Malthus, Darwin, Sanger, HG Wells, CG Darwin (FULL)Alan
Watt https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nT0BV7kJNbY
collapse of Darwinism & the theory of Evolution
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=28Gk1bsyXRs
Forbidden Science - Shattering the Myths of Darwin's Theory of Evolution
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Wr-lXLGCxQ
Dark Darwinian History of Eugenics 1/3
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uoKqjpWZkvs

https://www.americanscientist.org/article/all-in-the-family
 38

INCEST AND INFLUENCE: The Private Life of Bourgeois England. Adam

Kuper. viii + 296 pp. Harvard University Press, 2009.

Charles Darwin himself, who had pronounced himself reconciled to man’s

bestial ancestry in his earliest notebooks, for in 1839 he had married Emma
Wedgwood, a woman who was both his first cousin and his sister-in-law.
Persistent intermarriage between members of Darwin’s family and the
Wedgwood clan effectively intertwined two bourgeois dynasties of the English
Midlands. A plethora of biographical studies of the great evolutionist and the
ongoing publication of his correspondence have revealed the particularities of
this complex family network in great detail, with the result that more is perhaps
known about Darwin’s extended family than that of any comparable figure
(with the obvious exception of royalty). ???

Adam Kuper uses Darwin as an exemplar of a more general tendency. The

book opens with an account of Darwin’s protracted deliberation over whether
and whom to marry. His choice of a close relation as his spouse was, as Kuper
makes clear, entirely unexceptional for a man of his social position in England
at that time: In the Victorian upper middle classes, more than 1 marriage in 10
was between first or second cousins. A similar number of marriages were
between brothers- and sisters-in-law, meaning that about 1 person in 5 married
within the family circle. This emphasis on endogamy was an effective means
for bourgeois families like the Darwin-Wedgwoods to sustain beneficial
domestic connections and to safeguard the property and riches accrued
from the nascent industrial economy. Great intermarried families therefore
came to dominate trades such as ceramics (the Wedgwood family’s pottery was
world famous) and banking (the largest bank in the world, the House of
Rothschild, was a family firm, and many Quaker banking families, including the
Barclays and the Gurneys, intermarried and eventually merged their banks).
Unlike other scions of such families, Darwin took a keen interest in the
scientific aspects of interbreeding and heredity. Throughout his career he
remained acutely concerned as to “whether or not consanguineous marriages are
injurious to man,” as he put it in the conclusion to the Descent of Man in 1871.
Darwin thus plays a further part in Incest and Influence as one of the foremost
proponents (along with his cousin Francis Galton) of a more empirical approach
to questions of heredity. In 1870, Darwin participated in an attempt to get
Parliament interested in collecting evidence to determine whether cousin
marriages had “injurious consequences.” When the attempt failed, he designed a
study to address the question and asked his son George,* who was a
mathematician and amateur genealogist, to carry it out. George Darwin
consulted marriage records, studied genealogies of the peerage and landed
gentry, sent out questionnaires to upper-middle- and upper-class families, and
gathered statistics from mental asylums, eventually concluding that the
 39

proportion of patients in the asylums who were the offspring of first-cousin

marriages (about 3 to 4 percent) was about what one would expect given his
estimate that 3.5 percent of middle-class marriages were between first cousins.
The only finding that gave him pause was that although 3 to 3.5 percent of the
men at Oxford and Cambridge were the sons of first-cousin parents, only 2.4
percent of the men who rowed for those universities (and were thus presumably
extremely fit) were the offspring of cousins. In the end, he found little evidence
that interbreeding between cousins was injurious, at least in the middle and
upper classes, and both his father and Francis Galton endorsed his conclusions.
Curiously, as Kuper shows, for much of the 19th century the principal legal
concern with so-called incest was actually over marriage with a deceased wife’s
sister, which was prohibited by Scripture and did not become legal until 1907. It
was only after the First World War that scientific opinion hardened decisively
against cousin marriage. Interestingly, the most recent genetic studies, as Kuper
remarks in the book’s coda, now generally concord with George Darwin’s view
that the risks to the offspring of first-cousin marriages are well within the limits
of acceptability—that is, so long as cousin marriages are not repeated over
several generations. It is well known that Charles Darwin’s life was blighted by
recurrent stomach complaints (which resembled the fatal ailments of his
Wedgwood mother) and by persistent anxieties over the health of his own
children. Like many biographers, Kuper endeavors to discern a clear link
between Darwin’s putatively fretful domestic circumstances and his
revolutionary scientific thought. He cites the following passage from Darwin’s
1868 work The Variation of Animals and Plants Under Domestication: The
existence of a great law of nature is almost proved; namely, that the crossing of
animals and plants which are not closely related to each other is highly
beneficial or even necessary, and that interbreeding [i.e., inbreeding] prolonged
during many generations is highly injurious. Kuper then speculates that Darwin
“was bound to consider the implications for his own family. His scientific
project and his personal concerns could hardly be separated.” Significantly,
however, the phrase “closely related” in the above passage from Variation refers
not to the crossing of plant or animal “cousins,” but rather (as is clear from
sentences that precede it but are not quoted by Kuper) to more unambiguously
incestuous unions, such as a male animal “paired with his daughter,
granddaughter, and so on” or “matching brothers and sisters, which is
considered the closest form of interbreeding.” In fact, in a passage added to the
second edition of Variation in 1875, Darwin insists that “consanguineous
marriages, such as are permitted in civilised nations . . . would not be
considered as close interbreeding in the case of our domesticated animals.” It is,
I would suggest, only by blurring the distinctions between Darwin’s interest in
“close interbreeding” (a deliberately precise phrase that he uses repeatedly in
both On the Origin of Species and Variation) and his related but nonetheless
distinct concern with “consanguineous marriages” that Kuper can sustain the
 40

assertion, made in the introduction to Incest and Influence, that Darwin’s

apparent “personal obsession” with cousin marriage played a central role in
“provoking revolutionary ideas about breeding and heredity.” Such
unwarrantedly audacious claims and the book’s sensationally alliterative title
(hardly anyone used incest to describe cousin marriage in the period under
consideration) actually militate against what I consider its main insight in
relation to Darwin and Victorian society more generally: that cousin marriage
amongst the English bourgeoisie between the 1790s and 1910s was pervasive
and entirely commonplace. Our own attitudes to such unions are, as Kuper
acknowledges, perhaps more prejudiced than those of any previous period, and
this contemporary abhorrence is no more based on unequivocal scientific
grounds than was the Victorians’ seeming acceptance of the practice. Incest and
Influence presents a richly detailed and fascinating picture of the distinctive
family life of the Victorian bourgeoisie, which Kuper considers “one of the
great neglected themes of nineteenth-century history.” This portrait affords a
useful corrective to the excitable assumptions of many of Darwin’s biographers
(most notably Adrian Desmond and James Moore) that his marital
circumstances were so anomalous and worrying that they spurred on his
researches even into the self- and cross-fertilization of plants. *Due to an
editing error, in an earlier version of this review George was misidentified as
Charles Darwin's eldest son. Darwin's first-born son was actually William
Erasmus Darwin. Gowan Dawson is Senior Lecturer in the Victorian Studies
Centre at the University of Leicester. He is the author of Darwin, Literature and
Victorian Respectability (Cambridge University Press, 2007) and coauthor of
Science in the Nineteenth-Century Periodical: Reading the Magazine of Nature
(Cambridge University Press, 2004). Currently he is writing a new book titled
“Show Me the Bone”: Fragmentary Fossils, Functionalist Palaeontology and the
Reconstruction of Prehistoric Creatures in Nineteenth-Century British and
American Culture. He is also general editor, with Bernard Lightman, of an
eight-volume series, Victorian Science and Literature (forthcoming from
Pickering and Chatto).
https://www.amazon.com/Incest-Influence-Private-Bourgeois-
England/dp/0674035895

"Why do Darwinists claim that intelligent design is untestable, and

simultaneously claim that it is wrong?" -- Michael Egnor, neurosurgeon,
February 5th 2009

First of all, I love science. I think that the way that Darwinism corrupts the
evidence, distorts the evidence, is bad for science." -- Jonathan C. Wells,
molecular biologist, 2008
 41

"[Darwinism is] a kind of amusing 19th century collection of anecdotes that is

utterly unlike anything we see in the serious sciences. ... Yeah, biologists do
agree that this is the correct theory for the origin and diversification of life, but
here are some points you should consider as well: 1) the theory doesn't have any
substance, 2) it's preposterous, 3) it's not supported by the evidence and 4) the
fact that the biologists are uniformly in agreement about this issue could as
well be explained by some solid Marxist interpretation of their economic
interests." -- David Berlinski, author, 2008

"In the fabric of space and in the nature of matter, as in a great work of art, there
is, written small, the artist's signature." -- Carl E. Sagan, professor, 1985

"Darwinism is not a testable scientific theory, but a metaphysical research

programme." -- Karl Popper, Philosopher 1976.

Probabilities that DNA could evolve by 'random mutation' are so minute as to

be utterly laughable–akin to the idea that if you have enough monkeys tapping
away on typewriters, one of them will eventually produce a complete
masterpiece Shakespearean play.”—David Wilcock _ Scientist, Psychic

It was about eliminating God from the equation, and making society accept a
slave master system. For being successful he was buried in Westminster Abbey
along with the kings. This is why public debate on Darwinism is prohibited..

Charles Darwin was nothing more than a bitter racist. In his book published in
1871, "Descent of Man", he is quoted as saying, "Civilized man shouldn't
allow the inferior populations to breed like animals".

Father Tielhard de Chardin JESUIT / father of new age -- would first find
the Piltdown Man — the missing link from a gravel pit at Piltdown, East
Sussex, England in 1912. This immoral man fooled the world with a super
paleoanthropological hoax. The Piltdown man skull was constructed with the
lower jawbone of an orangutan with filed down teeth, deliberately combined
with the skull of a fully developed modern human. He faked the appearance of
age by staining the bones with an iron solution and chromic acid. The Piltdown
man was to represent an evolutionary missing link between apes and humans,
since the combination of a human-like cranium with an ape-like jaw tended to
support the notion then prevailing in the West that human evolution began with
the brain.
 42

In December 1929, in a cave near Peking, our Jesuit priest Pierre Teilhard de
Chardin would uncover a prehuman bones -- again. The Rothschild
monopolized media sang the praises of this fake discovery , Peking Man and
acclaimed this as the missing link between erect hunting apes and our Cro-
Magnon ancestors..

“Peking Man,”was a just a pathetic and crude use of monkey bones he had
modified to look “human”.

Pierre Teilhard de Chardin spent the years 1923-1946 in China. Rothschild has
provided him with a fleet of French cars. Peking Man was “discovered” (sic!) in
China, in the 1920s. The fossils, found about 25 miles from Peking (Beijing),
consisted mostly of skull fragments and few teeth, with even fewer limb bones.
All of the original bones were mysteriously "lost" between 1941 and 1945

Teilhard cleverly made some duplicate casts which Rothschild’s media claimed
was made from the original. The truth surrounding Peking Man was kept from
the public, while Rothschild controlled evolutionists acclaimed it as a "missing
link." Teilhard participated in the 1935 Yale–Cambridge expedition in northern
and central India with the geologist Helmut de Terra and Patterson— and this
was the time he gathered material for his “original” consciousness discoveries
and his weird and stupid proses on Christ Omega, who was “beyond
Christianity -- ze Universal Christ.

Pierre Teilhard de Chardin died in New York City on March 15, 1955, at the
age of 73, after a heart attack. The Rothschild controlled media like New York
Times in March 19, 1937 presented Teilhard as the Jesuit who held that man
descended from monkeys. Was the Pope sleeping ? Then in 1947 Vatican
suddenly woke up. The Pope forbade Teilhard to write or teach on philosophical
subjects. The Supreme Authority of the Holy Office, in a decree dated 15
November 1957, forbade the works of de Chardin to be retained in libraries,
including those of religious institutes. His books were not to be sold in Catholic
bookshops and were not to be translated in other languages. A decree of the
Holy Office dated 30 June 1963, under the authority of Pope John XXIII
warned that “. . . it is obvious that in philosophical and theological matters, the
said works (de Chardin’s) are replete with ambiguities or rather with serious
errors which offend Catholic doctrine. The Vicariate of Rome (a diocese ruled
in the name of Pope Paul VI by his Cardinal Vicar) in a decree dated 30
September 1963 , required that Catholic booksellers in Rome should withdraw
 43

from circulation the works of de Chardin, together with those books which
favour his erroneous doctrines.= CONTROLLED OPPOSITION

BENJAMIN FRANKLIN = HELLFIRE CLUB , SATANIST , FREEMASON

, ROTHSCHILDS PUPPET -------- THOMAS JEFFERSON etc =
FREEMASONS / CONTROLLED OPPOSITION
http://www.theeventchronicle.com/study/house-rothschild-freemasons-federal-
reserve-cartel http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread414313/pg1
https://www.globalresearch.ca/the-federal-reserve-cartel-freemasons-and-the-
house-of-rothschild/25179

http://judeo-masonic.blogspot.in/2010/02/3a-american-revolution-
addendum.html

https://adonis49.wordpress.com/2012/06/10/privately-owned-federal-reserve-
bank-how-the-rothschild-family-controlled-the-printing-of-the-dollars/

www.whale.to/b/rothschild.html

Freemasonry was extensively diffused in the Sardinian States in the eighteenth

century. Even members of the Court and the King himself joined in 1780,
although Pope Benedict XIV had formally condemned these associations in
1751. Quite likely, the aristocracy did not belong to the more politically
progressive lodges ...

https://comingworldwar3.wordpress.com/2010/08/01/charles-darwin-theory-of-
evolution-eugenics-freemasonry-connection-the-triumph-of-political-agendas-
over-scientific-truth/
His grandfather-in-law, Josiah Wedgwood, embraced the Unitarian faith and
kept the company of such radical Unitarian thinkers as Joseph Priestley.
https://www.unitarian.org.uk/sites/default/files/2009_Darwin_WorshipPack.pdf
http://www.conservapedia.com/Essay:_Erasmus_Darwin's_unique_dinner_table
https://creation.com/darwinism-it-was-all-in-the-family
https://creation.com/darwin-slavery-and-abolition

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darwin_Industry
www.darwinarkivet.dk/en/debate/topics-in-darwin-studies/the-darwin-industry/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Freemasonry
https://www.stormfront.org/forum/t825537/
https://www.timetoast.com/timelines/the-age-of-reason
 44

Sir Charles Darwin used the Athenaeum to study in 1838. Darwin enjoyed
being a member here. “I am full of admiration at the Athenæum; one meets so
many people there, that one likes to see," he wrote to Lyell shortly after joining.

Francis Galton: Pioneer of Heredity and Biometry This recognition gave him
an established position in the scientific world, which led to his election in 1855
as a member of the Athenaeum Club and in 1860 as a Fellow of the Royal
Society, his proposer for the latter being Charles Darwin. The Athenaeum was
the leading London club in the arts and sciences, to which he ...

The Athenaeum Club was an elite gentlemen's club at 107 Pall Mall, London, at
the corner of Waterloo Place (Women were admitted in 2002.) The club was
founded by John Wilson Croker and Sir Thomas Lawrence with the aid of
some friends in 1823, all men of inherited wealth and status. The club was
originally limited to ...

https://www.revolvy.com/main/index.php?s=Athenaeum%20Club,%20London
&item_type=topic

http://omni.sytes.net/Monks.htm https://listverse.com/2016/04/21/10-
bizarre-clubs-with-extremely-influential-members/
www.blather.net/theblather/1998/06/francis_dashwood_of_the_englis/

gen. in Medicine Expand -gen or -gene suff. Producer: androgen. One that is
produced: phosgene.
French -gène, from Greek -genēs born; akin to Greek genos birth
gen = noun=
Information-- in form/ shape
Gen. abbreviation 1. General 2. (Bible) Genesis
general genitive genus Definition of Gen Genesis offspring : race genocide :
genus : kind genotype Origin and Etymology of gen- Greek genos birth, race,
kind — more at kin
Originally in late 18th century chemistry and probably reflecting
misunderstanding of -genes, as though it meant "that which produces.
Gen. 1. Military. General. 2. Genesis. 3. Geneva.

https://jackshea.net/the-ox-and-ankh-symbols-leads-to-1111/
 45

what is oxygen . especially from time 50.00

on https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YI-cpUyz3zQ
Hydrogen - A Theoretical
Element? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DLgjbJ38oZY Can Water Really
Be Made From Hydrogen &
Oxygen? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0OJt2zG15GU
The Great Oxygen
Deception https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wb0zmZ6eGz4

O = the letter O & circle -- represents vagina

X stands for obelisk / phallus / penis

"X" stands for Aton and also for The legendary symbol for Nimrod is "X." [[
Obelisk (A symbol of the Sun God Ra, or Nimrod) at the Israeli Supreme Court.
Pope faces Egyptian Obelisk (or Sun Ray, phallus) which is the symbol of
Nimrod. http://www.whale.to/c/nimrod.html ]]
since Masonry has replaced the cross of Jesus with an "X" representing their
own 'christ', that 'christ' of Masonry was the Biblical Antichrist; therefore, the
"X" in modern Freemasonry represents Antichrist! Thus, the "X" in the Skull &
Bones symbol represents the Black Magick Masonry symbol for Antichrist.
Vesica Piscis The Flag of the Church of Scotland - bearing a Mosaic "burning
bush" motif. The "fiery tree" with 3 roots is, however, Druidic in origin, as is
the zodiacal cross in the background. This cross is also meant to symbolize the
numeral 1O (Ten), another insignia of Aten or Aton (Ten). See 10 Downing
Street.

"X" stands for Aton The Illuminist/Masonic meaning of the X is simply this: It
is the sign of Osiris, the great (Egyptian) sun God... —Texe Marrs Dark
Majesty
www.whale.to/b/x_h.html
www.whale.to/c/rx.html

SEX IN THE POINT WITHIN A CIRCLE

The point and the circle carries a sexual connotation. How can this be, you
might ask? If you have to ask that question, you do not have the mind and heart
of a pagan. One Masonic author states that this symbol is used in Sun Worship,
and then says: "The female principle, symbolized by the moon, assumed the
form of a lunette [small circular opening], or crescent, while the male principle,
symbolized by the sun, assumed the form of the lingam [Phallus] and placed
 46

himself erect in the center of the lunette, like the mast of a ship." ["Point Within
A Circle", Short Talk Bulletin , August, 1931, Masonic Bulletin designed to
read within the Lodges, p. 4]
https://sites.google.com/site/freemasonryajesuitfront/home/masonic-symbols-
are-symbols-of-sex www.cuttingedge.org/free16.htm

http://truthiracy.blogspot.in/2011/07/http://truthiracy.blogspot.in/2011/

EL is the Bull God of the Bible, the horned Ox. The Ox or the Bull (Cow) gave
life to all animals and breathed air into them to give them life. We know that
AN is the creator (TOR) God along with Anu, witch means the Heavens or the
Air, as well as the wind (breath). So, this is why we need air to live and breath
and survive, which is the reason that the air that we need to survive is called
Oxygen which comes from the OX (Bull). Thus the word animal can mean the
Breath (air) of EL (Bull Ox God). Oxygen has the element with an atomic
number of 8 (eight). The symbol (Bull) is the letter "O" or number "0," again
from the sacred goddess circle of life. Look on your keyboard and the number 8
(eight), you'll notice that the symbol is the Asterisk, which is the same symbol
of the Sumerian cuneiform for An or Anu, which means deity. This comes from
Ishtar or Astarte Goddess (Venus), thus the 5 points on the star, and her star was
also the eight pointed star. Ishtar and Astarte come form the ancient An or Anu.
==== This is just an ancient man made theology of course, and we should all
know not to take this literally, Obviously. Christopher Lord, Truthiracy