Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Review
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: Thermal stability and spontaneous ignition conditions of uranium hydride and uranium metal fine pow-
Received 1 September 2009 ders have been studied and observed in an original and dedicated experimental device placed inside a
Accepted 10 November 2009 glove box under flowing pure argon. Pure uranium hydride powder with low amount of oxide
(<0.5 wt.%) was obtained by heat treatment at low temperature in flowing Ar/5%H2. Pure uranium pow-
der was obtained by dehydration in flowing pure argon. Those fine powders showed spontaneous ignition
Keywords: at room temperature in air. An in situ CCD-camera displayed ignition associated with powder tempera-
Uranium
ture measurement. Characterization of powders before and after ignition was performed by XRD mea-
Hydride
UH3
surements and SEM observations. Oxidation mechanisms are proposed.
Ignition Ó 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Oxidation
Synthesis
Characterization
Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 294
2. Materials and experimental device . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 295
3. Results. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 296
3.1. Synthesis of pure uranium hydride . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 296
3.2. Synthesis of pure uranium powder . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 297
3.3. Ignition of uranium hydride in air . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 297
3.4. Ignition of uranium powder in air . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 299
3.5. Characterization of final products . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 299
4. Interpretation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 301
5. Conclusions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 301
Acknowledgement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 302
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 302
0022-3115/$ - see front matter Ó 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.11.007
F. Le Guyadec et al. / Journal of Nuclear Materials 396 (2010) 294–302 295
being observed with a CCD-camera placed above the crucible out- 2. Materials and experimental device
side the furnace. Sample temperature was measured with thermo-
couples directly placed inside the powder layer. Uranium base-material was used in the form of small thin mil-
The synthesis conditions of UH3 powders such as temperature, limetric plates about 20 mg each. After treatment in nitric acid
gas composition, flow rate, processing time, are not well based. 3.5 N solution during 12 min to avoid oxide-scale on uranium sur-
Hausner and Zambrow [5] indicates 175–225 °C temperature range face, the plates were exposed to flowing 0.5 L min1 argon contain-
as an optimal level for obtaining pure uranium hydride in flowing ing 5% hydrogen, during 10 h at 192 °C. Temperature was reached
pure hydrogen. Small amount of oxygen in hydrogen process gas is with a rate of 10 °C min1. Platelets were hydrated in a stainless
known to delay the start of the reaction. Maximum reaction rate steel 30 mm diameter crucible which was heat-treated in argon
lays around 225 °C. Higher reaction rates can be obtained with during 4 h at 300 °C before hydration to avoid oxygen pollution.
higher hydrogen pressures. Above 225 °C, hydration kinetics be- In those conditions quantitative hydration of uranium metal could
come progressively lower and uranium grains obtained by decom- be obtained for sample mass around 5 g.
position of hydride may appear under vacuum. At higher Fine uranium powder could be obtained by heat treatment of
temperature, uranium particles formed during decomposition of previous UH3 powder in the same flowing conditions but in
hydride may sinter in vacuum. pure argon, during 10 h at higher temperature 250 °C, allowing
The reverse reaction between uranium and hydrogen becomes dehydration. A 30 mm diameter crucible was used as for UH3
significant above 225 °C for Stakebake [6]. Albrecht and Mallett synthesis.
[7] shows maximum reaction velocity at about 280 °C and Hashino Both experiments were performed inside a kanthal-resistor fur-
and Okajima [8] indicates 268 °C as a limit temperature. Rate de- nace allowing maximal temperature of 500 °C. The furnace was
crease at higher temperatures is due to decomposition reaction placed inside a glove-box with very low leak rate <5.104 h1.
hindering the hydration reaction process. Alire studies [9] show Glove-box was maintained in flowing pure argon recycled with
that induction times could be eliminated by using high purity an inerting unit after removal of oxygen and water vapor. Two
gases. Induction effects caused by surface oxide films may be elim- purification reactors (purification reactor consisting in a molecular
inated in high vacuum [10]. Furthermore, Condon [10] indicates sieve for water vapor and in copper for oxygen impurity) allowed
dehydration kinetics in the range 200–300 °C. Many studies have very small concentrations ranging between 2 and 8 ppm. This
been done with uranium bulk material. Hashino [8] and Condon experimental specificity was necessary for handling fine reactive
[10] studied uranium coupons. powders as uranium hydride to prevent them from oxygen before
Uranium hydride occurs from following reaction: controlled heat-treatment in the furnace. It allowed obtaining very
1
small amounts of oxide in UH3 and U powders.
U þ 3=2H2 ! UH3 ; with DHr ¼ 127 kJ mol Ignition tests were performed in the same furnace under differ-
ent oxidizing atmospheres and especially in air. Samples were ex-
This reaction is reversible and decomposition of UH3 can occur
posed to flowing gas rates until 10 L min1. Round 2 g of uranium
under specific conditions.
UH3
4000
UH3
3000
Lin (Counts)
UH3
2000 UH3
Ta
UH3
1000 UH3 UH3 UH3
0
20 30 40 50 60 70
2-Theta - Scale
CONDA Essai n°19 - File: X6790.raw - Type: 2Th/Th locked - Start: 20.000 ° - End: 80.000 ° - Step: 0.015 ° - Step time: 19.9 s - Temp.: 25 °C (Room) - Time Started: 7 s - 2-Theta: 20.000 ° - Theta: 10.000 ° - Chi: 0.00 ° - Phi: 0.00
Operations: X Offset -0.075 | X Offset -0.063 | Background 1.000,1.000 | Import
00-004-0788 (*) - Tantalum - Ta - Y: 19.11 % - d x by: 1. - WL: 1.5406 - Cubic - a 3.30580 - b 3.30580 - c 3.30580 - alpha 90.0 00 - beta 90.000 - gamma 90.000 - Body-centered - Im-3m (229) - 2 - 36.1268 - I/Ic PDF 4.4 - F8=110(0
00-040-1313 (I) - Uranium Hydride - UH3 - Y: 78.03 % - d x by: 1. - WL: 1.5406 - Cubic - a 6.63890 - b 6.63890 - c 6.63890 - al pha 90.000 - beta 90.000 - gamma 90.000 - Primitive - Pm-3n (223) - 8 - 292.609 - F24= 9(0.0601,43)
00-041-1422 (*) - Uraninite-C - UO2 - Y: 1.12 % - d x by: 1. - WL: 1.5406 - Cubic - a 5.46700 - b 5.46700 - c 5.46700 - alpha 9 0.000 - beta 90.000 - gamma 90.000 - Face-cente red - Fm-3m (225) - 4 - 163.398 - F9= 77(0.0130,9)
Fig. 1. Uranium hydride powder obtained after heat-treatment of uranium plates in Ar–5%H2 and XRD analysis.
296 F. Le Guyadec et al. / Journal of Nuclear Materials 396 (2010) 294–302
Fig. 2. Uranium hydride grains observed by scanning electron microscopy (X250 left and X16000 right).
1300
1200
Ta
1100
1000 U
900
800
U Ta
Lin (Counts)
700 U
600
500 U U
400
Ta
300 U
200 U
100
0
21 30 40 50 60 70
2-Theta - Scale
CONDA essai 30 - File: X6820.raw - Type: 2Th/Th locked - Start: 20.000 ° - End: 80.000 ° - Step: 0.015 ° - Step time: 19.9 s - Temp.: 25 °C (Room) - Time Started: 15 s - 2-Theta: 20.000 ° - Theta: 10.00
Operations: X Offset 0.037 | Background 0.098,1.000 | Import
00-004-0788 (*) - Tantalum - Ta - Y: 75.60 % - d x by: 1. - WL: 1.5406 - Cubic - a 3.30580 - b 3.30580 - c 3.30580 - alpha 90.000 - beta 90.000 - gamma 90.000 - Body-centered - Im-3m (229) - 2 - 36.12
03-065-2477 (I) - Uranium - U - Y: 67.16 % - d x by: 1. - WL: 1.5406 - Orthorhombic - a 2.85800 - b 5.87600 - c 4.95500 - alpha 90.000 - beta 90.000 - gamma 90.000 - Base-centered - Cmcm (63) - 4 - 8
Fig. 3. Uranium fine powder after heat treatment in argon at 250 °C and XRD analysis.
F. Le Guyadec et al. / Journal of Nuclear Materials 396 (2010) 294–302 297
Fig. 4. Uranium grains observed by scanning electron microscopy (X250 left and X16000 right).
298 F. Le Guyadec et al. / Journal of Nuclear Materials 396 (2010) 294–302
the bulk of the material. It must be noted that the volume of the combustion, to reach finally two or three times the initial thickness
powder bed significantly increased during ignition and during solid after heating until 500 °C.
1000
800
700
600
Final product
temperature (°C)
500
400
300
200
100
0
-500 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 50
time (s)
Fig. 7. Sample temperature measurement: temperature rise at ignition and during heating, volume increase after test in air.
1000 1030
air introduction
1020
700
sample
600
temperature (°C)
pressure (mb)
1015
500
1010
400
300
1005
pressure
200
1000
100
0 995
-200 -100 0 100 200 300 400
time (s)
Fig. 8. Temperature peak at ignition and pressure variation inside the furnace.
F. Le Guyadec et al. / Journal of Nuclear Materials 396 (2010) 294–302 299
In the same experimental conditions pure fresh and dry ura- 3.5. Characterization of final products
nium powder was tested. A 5 mm thick powder bed with 2.8 g of
uranium was exposed to air in the furnace, after 10 min under After ignition test and cooling to room temperature, XRD pat-
flowing pure argon. As well as in the case of uranium hydride, igni- tern showed only uranium oxide U3O8 (Fig. 12) both from UH3
tion occurred shortly after air introduction into the furnace, at and U powder oxidized in air at 500 °C. The second temperature
room temperature. No flash of lightening was observed, only solid peak observed nearly 300 °C corresponded to complete transfor-
combustion occurred with uranium powder (Fig. 10). Sample tem- mation of the residual hydride or uranium and UO2 into U3O8
perature was still near 200 °C during several minutes. No significa- oxide. U3O8 grains were observed by scanning electron micros-
tive pressure variation was noticed in the furnace during the copy. Grains obtained from UH3 ignition are keeping the form of
ignition. Temperature and pressure monitoring are presented in platelets with memory of the initial grain structure of the uranium
Fig. 11. Final product was again U3O8. hydride. Some smoothening appears at the surface of the elongated
UO2
U3O8 U3O8
U3O8
600
Ta
UH3
500
U3O8
400
Lin (Counts)
UO2
300
UO2
Ta
U3O8
200
U3O8
U3O8 U3O8
100 UH3
0
20 30 40 50 60 70
2-Theta - Scale
CONDA essai n°20 - File: X6898.raw - Type: 2Th/Th locked - Start: 20.000 ° - End: 79.820 ° - Step: 0.015 ° - Step time: 19.9 s - Temp.: 25 °C (Room) - Time Started: 13 s - 2-Theta: 20.000 ° - Theta: 10.000 ° - Chi: 0.0
Operations: X Offset -0.212 | X Offset -0.228 | Smooth 0.106 | Background 1.000,1.000 | Import
00-004-0788 (*) - Tantalum - Ta - Y: 76.20 % - d x by: 1. - WL: 1.5406 - Cubic - a 3.30580 - b 3.30580 - c 3.30580 - alpha 90.000 - beta 90.000 - gamma 90.000 - Body-centered - Im-3m (229) - 2 - 36.1268 - I/Ic PDF 4
04-007-2522 (N) - Uranium Oxide - UO2.12 - Y: 100.47 % - d x by: 1. - WL: 1.5406 - Cubic - a 5.44100 - b 5.44100 - c 5.44100 - alpha 90.000 - beta 90.000 - gamma 90.000 - Face-centered - Fm-3m (225) - 4 - 161.07
00-031-1425 (C) - Uranium Oxide - U3O8 - Y: 135.16 % - d x by: 1. - WL: 1.5406 - Hexagonal - a 6.81200 - b 6.81200 - c 4.14200 - alpha 90.000 - beta 90.000 - gamma 120.000 - Primitive - P-62m (189) - 1 - 166.452
00-040-1313 (I) - Uranium Hydride - UH3 - Y: 52.66 % - d x by: 1. - WL: 1.5406 - Cubic - a 6.63890 - b 6.63890 - c 6.63890 - alpha 90.000 - beta 90.000 - gamma 90.000 - Primitive - Pm-3n (223) - 8 - 292.609 - F24=
1000 1035
air introduction
sample temperature
900 regulation temperature
furnace pressure 1030
800
sample
1025
700
600
température (°C)
1020
pressure
pressure (mb)
500
1015
400
300
1010
200
1005
100
0 1000
-200 0 200 400 600 800 1000
time (s)
Fig. 11. Sample temperature measurement: temperature rise at ignition and during solid combustion.
2800
U3O8 U3O8
2700
2600
2500
2400
2300
2200 U3O8
2100 Ta
2000
1900
1800
1700
Lin (Counts)
1600
1500
1400
1300
1200
1100
1000 U3O8
900
800
700
600 U3O8 U3O8 U3O8
500
400
300
200
100
0
20 30 40 50 60 70
2-Theta - Scale
CONDA Essai n°23 - File: X6799.raw - Type: 2Th/Th locked - Start: 20.000 ° - End: 80.000 ° - Step: 0.015 ° - Step time: 19.9 s - Temp.: 25 °C (Room) - Time Started: 14 s - 2-Theta: 20.000 ° - Theta: 10.000 ° - Chi: 0.00 ° - Phi: 0.00
Operations: X Offset -0.131 | X Offset -0.131 | Background 1.000,1.000 | Import
00-004-0788 (*) - Tantalum - Ta - Y: 28.66 % - d x by: 1. - WL: 1.5406 - Cubic - a 3.30580 - b 3.30580 - c 3.30580 - alpha 90.000 - beta 90.000 - gamma 90.000 - Body-centered - Im-3m (229) - 2 - 36.1268 - I/Ic PDF 4.4 - F8=110(0.
00-040-1313 (I) - Uranium Hydride - UH3 - Y: 8.93 % - d x by: 1. - WL: 1.5406 - Cubic - a 6.63890 - b 6.63890 - c 6.63890 - alpha 90.000 - beta 90.000 - gamma 90.000 - Primitive - Pm-3n (223) - 8 - 292.609 - F24= 9(0.0601,43)
00-031-1424 (C) - Uranium Oxide - U3O8 - Y: 157.57 % - d x by: 1. - WL: 1.5406 - Orthorhombic - a 6.71600 - b 11.96000 - c 4.14700 - alpha 90.000 - beta 90.000 - gamma 90.000 - Base-centered - C2mm (38) - 2 - 333.101 - I/Ic P
Fig. 12. XRD pattern after ignition of uranium in air: U3O8 oxide.
F. Le Guyadec et al. / Journal of Nuclear Materials 396 (2010) 294–302 301
U þ O2 ! UO2
UH3 ! U þ 3=2H2 ;
U þ O2 ! UO2 ;
– and finally, complete transformation follows: UO2 þ 1=3O2 !
Fig. 14. Grains observed by scanning electron microscopy (X16000) after U ignition 1=3U3 O8 .
in air.
platelets and compared to the initial grains, ridges are less angular, 5. Conclusions
grains are rounded up (Fig. 13). Grains obtained from U powder
ignition are most of the time round grains with less memory of The UH3 powder that was obtained in this study by heat treat-
the initial platelets structure than in the case of UH3 ignition ment at low temperature in flowing Ar/5%H2 was very pure hy-
(Fig. 14). dride as proved by XRD and Rietveld analysis. UH3 grains were
not surrounded with any small oxide layer which could protect
the hydride, avoid further oxidation and prevent from ignition at
4. Interpretation low temperatures in air. This point can specially explain the igni-
tion we observed at room temperature. Mass of the sample (a
Experimental results about ignition in air of uranium hydride few grams) and the configuration of a powder bed well exposed
and uranium fine powders could be observed, monitored with a to the flowing air can also explain this point. Oxygen could easily
CCD camera and sample temperature could be registered continu- reach the powder.
ously during ignition and heating. Ignition steps could clearly be Uranium fine and pure powders could be obtained by low tem-
identified. perature heat treatment in pure argon and short operating times.
Uranium hydride ignited through a two-step process including The PYRO test setup, with its low O2 and H2O amounts continu-
gaseous combustion with a brief flash of lightning and a flame at ously controlled and maintained inside the glove-box, allows many
the sample surface in the beginning of the ignition, followed by a applications concerning very reactive materials which must be
solid phase combustion step first at the surface and then inside protected from air. CEA continues to conduct active research on
the bulk of the powder bed during several minutes. Sample tem- the pyrophoric behaviour of U-base materials, including materials
perature rise until 860 °C and above was registered and during for future nuclear cycle.
the solid combustion phase sample temperature was still main- Spontaneous ignition was achieved at room temperature when
tained above 300 °C for several minutes. Ignition occurred at ambi- uranium hydride or metallic uranium fine powders are freshly syn-
ent temperature as soon as air was introduced inside the furnace. thesized and kept away from oxygen and moisture.
302 F. Le Guyadec et al. / Journal of Nuclear Materials 396 (2010) 294–302
Acknowledgement [2] F. Le Guyadec, C. Rado, C. Chatillon, E. Blanquet, J. Nucl. Mat. 393 (2009)
333.
[3] M. Epstein, W. Luangdilok, M.G. Plys, H.K. Fauske, Nucl. Saf. 37 (1996) 12.
This work has been performed with the financial support of [4] T.C. Totemeier, J. Nucl. Mat. 278 (2000) 301.
AREVA. [5] H.H. Hausner, J.L. Zambrow, At. Energy Div. (DCF N 5704).
[6] J.L. Stakebake, J. Electroch. Soc. 126 (1979) 1596.
[7] W.M. Albrecht, M.W. Mallett, J. Electroch. Soc. 103 (1956) 404.
References [8] T. Hashino, Y. Okajima, J. Phys. Chem. 77 (1973) 2236.
[9] R.M. Alire, B.A. Mueller, C.L. Peterson, J.R. Mosley, J. Chem. Phys. 52 (1970) 37.
[1] F. Le Guyadec, S. Joffre, C. Chatillon, E. Blanquet, Matériaux 2006, 13–17 [10] J.B. Condon, E.A. Larson, J. Chem. Phys. 59 (1973) 855.
November 2006, Dijon, France.