Repport Steel Structure PDF

ENGINREERING ASSESSMENT REPORT
NAME OF THE PROJECT:

EXISTING SINGLE STORIED WASTAGE GODOWN STEEL SHED AT
MOMINNAGAR, GORAI, MIRZAPUR, TANGAIL DHAKA
NAME OF THE CLIENT
Uniglory Packaging Industries Ltd.
VOLUME 1 OF 2
Date of Submission: 05.02.18 Submitted By:
Name of the Submitting Engineer
Engr. Abdul Quddus

DESIGN & DEVELOPMENT SOLUTION
B.Sc. Engg(Civil, BUET),
Lane #23, House-#160, Ground Floor, New DOHS,
DMINB/CE-0231 Mohakhali, Dhaka-1206,
MIEB-21384 Mobile: +8801718612966,
E-mail: quddus_ce@yahoo.com
Web: www.ddslt.com
Mohakhali, Dhaka-1206,
Mobile: +8801718612966,
Web: www.ddslt.com
TABLE OF CONTENT
Sl No Description
1.0 Introduction
2.0 Scope of Work
3.0 Methodology
4.0 Structural Design Concept and criteria
4.1 Codes and Standards
4.2 General Load Data
4.3 Load applied on structure
4.4 Load Combination
4.5 Materials Data
4.6 Analysis Method and Software Used.
5.0 Structural adequacy check
6.0 Conclusion & Recommendation
Attached documents
A2 As-Built Drawing
A3 Retrofitting Drawing
Mobile: +8801718612966,
Web: www.ddslt.com
1.0) INTRODUCTION
Existing single storied wastage godown shed for Uniglory Packaging Industries Ltd. Located at
MOMINNAGAR, GORAI, MIRZAPUR, TANGAIL, DHAKA has been analyzed for different loading
conditions & different load combinations accordingly. This report summarizes the analysis and
design related data
2.0) SCOPE OF WORK

The design work of this Project has been carried out following the design criteria and Bangladesh National
Building Code (BNBC). The scope of the work is as follows-
 Arranged As-Built Drawing.

 Analysis & comments on existing structure
Produced retrofitting drawing where required
3.0) WORK METHEDOLOGY

Based on the supplied Architectural Drawing, field measurement we, DESIGN & DEVELOPMENT SOLUTION
(DDS)” developed a computer analysis model and carried out complete analysis of the structure incorporating
various design data as per Bangladesh National Building Code (BNBC). Loading values is considered as
prescribed in BNBC. Strength parameter of steel is considered 50ksi. The results obtained from computer
model analysis were checked against relevant specifications and hand calculations. Finally, the design data is
compared with the As Built drawing of this structure. If it is satisfied then the structure is safe and sound,
otherwise additional treatment is provided for further uses.
4.0) STRUCTURAL DESIGN CONCEPT & CRITERIA

The structural element has been designed and considering the following criteria.
4.1) CODES AND STANDARDS

1) Bangladesh National Building Code (BNBC)-2006
2) American Institute of steel construction (AISC)
3) American Society for Testing Materials (ASTM)
Mobile: +8801718612966,
Web: www.ddslt.com
4.2) GENERAL LOAD DATA
Dead Load:
Dead load is the vertical load due to the self-weight of the permanent structural and non-structural component of
a building, e.g. Foundation, column, rafters, deck, steel joists, purlins, walls, ceilings, permanent partitions and
fixed service equipment.
Unit weight of materials and the calculation of design dead loads are according to section-2.2, Chapter-2, part-
6, BNBC-Page6-22
Live Load:
Live load is the load superimposed by the use or occupancy of the building not including the environmental
loads such as wind load, rain load, earthquake load or dead load. (Ref. BNBC, Part-6, Chapter-2, Sec-2.3.2)
But it should be not less than the minimum floor live load. (Ref. BNBC, Part-6, Chapter-2, Sec-2.3.3)
Mobile: +8801718612966,
Web: www.ddslt.com
Wind Load:
The calculation of wind load confirms the sub-clause 2.4, Chapter 2, Part-6 of BNBC. The following equation
has been used to calculate sustained wind pressure of the structure.
Pz=CgCpCcCiCzVb2 [BNBC, 2.4.6.2,2.4.6.3 Page-6-33,6-34]
Wind load was applied in two orthogonal directions X and Y.

GARBAGE SHED
Dead Load, DL (sheeting)= 2 psf
Dead Load, DL (purlin)= 1.5 psf
Live Load, LL= 20 psf
BASIC WIND SPEED DATA
Select your Location
Tangail 160
Building Dimension Data
B 77.52 Feet
L 104.64 Feet
Height (h) 24.0014 Feet
Roof Slope (theta) 6 degree
47.2*10^-
Cc 6
Ci 1
Cz 0.451
Exposure Category A
qz 0.545
Cg 1.556
Pz 0.84802 Cpe
wind load on wall
Winward wall Pressure 14.0975 Psf
Leeward Wall Pressure -7.5779 Psf
Side wall Pressure -12.335 Psf
Wind load on roof (windward uplift)
h/l 0.2293712
THETA
theta 6 THETA 1 1
0 10
h/L 1 0.1 -0.7 -0.9
h/L 2 0.3 -0.7 -0.9
Mobile: +8801718612966,
Web: www.ddslt.com
OUR H/L 0.2293712 -0.7 -0.9 -0.82

THETA 6
Winward roof -14.45 Psf
Leeward Roof -12.34 Psf
h/b 0.23 cpe(parallel toridge)
0.7
Parallel to ridge Pressure 12.3353 Psf
Wind load on roof (windward downward)
h/l 0.2293712
THETA
theta 6 THETA 1 1
0 10
h/L 1 0.1 -0.7 0.2
h/L 2 0.3 -0.7 0.2
OUR H/L 0.2293712 -0.7 0.2 -0.16
THETA 6
Winward roof -2.82 Psf
Leeward Roof -12.34 Psf
h/b 0.31 cpe(parallel toridge)
0.7
Parallel to ridge Pressure -12.335 Psf
Earth quake Load:

As per specifications of BNBC, Part-6, Chapter-2, section-2.5.51, Equivalent Static Force Method can be
applied to calculate the earth quake force of this structure.
Design Base Shear, V=ZICW/R (Ref. Sec2.5.6.1, Chapter-2, Part-6, BNBC)
Where,
Z=Seismic Zone coefficient factor,
I=Importance factor,
C=Numerical Co-efficient,
R=Response Modification factor,
Mobile: +8801718612966,
Web: www.ddslt.com
4.3) LOAD APPLIED ON STRUCTURE
Dead Load:
i. Self-weight of structure.
Live Load:
i. Live load on roof=0.5KN/m2

Wind Load:
i. Basic wind speed, Vb=160Km/h
ii. Exposure Type=A
iii. Importance factor, I=1.0
Wind load was applied in two orthogonal directions X and Z.
Seismic Load:
i. Seismic Zone coefficient factor, Z=0.15( Zone-02)
ii. Importance factor, I = 1.0
iii. Response Modification factor, R=6
iv. Site co-efficient, S=1.5
Earth quake load was applied in two orthogonal directions X & Z.
4.4.1 Load Symbol

a) DL = Dead Load ~ self-weight of structure , roof sheet & purlin weight, chequered plate
weight
b) LR = Roof live load
c) WL = Wind Load
d) EQ = Earthquake Load
4.4.2 Load Combination (Alliance Standard)

 1.2DL +0.5Lr
 1.2DL+0.5 Lr +1.3WL
 1.2DL+0.5Lr+1.5EQ
Mobile: +8801718612966,
Web: www.ddslt.com
4.4.3 Load Combination (BNBC Standard)

 1.4DL
 1.2DL +0.5Lr
 1.2DL+1.6 Lr +0.8WL
 1.2DL+0.5 Lr +1.3WL
 1.2DL+1.5EQ
 0.9DL+1.5EQ
 0.9DL+1.3WL
4.5 Material Data
The following strength parameter is considered for assessment of building
SL/No Strength
01 Flexural strength of Steel Section 50,000 Psi
4.6) METHOD OF ANALYSIS AND SOFTWARE USED:

We used 3d computer modeling of existing structure to simulate the effect of Dead Load, Live Load, Wind and
Earthquake load.
We used STADD Pro V8i for analysis

Mobile: +8801718612966,
Web: www.ddslt.com
5.0 ADEQUACY CHECK

Mobile: +8801718612966,
Web: www.ddslt.com
5.1 Member Adequacy check(Before retrofitting)
Member capacity ratio. (Present condition)
Analysis Design Actual Allowable Normalized Ratio

Beam Clause
Property Property Ratio Ratio (Actual/Allowable)
87 Taper Taper 1.16 1 1.16 LRFD-H1-1B-C
75 Taper Taper 1.174 1 1.174 L/R-EXCEEDS
52 Taper Taper 0.837 1 0.837 LRFD-H1-1B-T
Mobile: +8801718612966,
Web: www.ddslt.com

24 Taper Taper 4.524 1 4.524 LRFD-H1-1A-C
Comments: Several members are inadequate. Inadequate members are proposed to

strengthen.
Mobile: +8801718612966,
Web: www.ddslt.com
5.2 Member Adequacy check(After Retrofitting)
Member capacity ratio. (After retrofitting condition)

Analysis Design Actual Allowable Normalized Ratio
Beam Clause
Property Property Ratio Ratio (Actual/Allowable)
Mobile: +8801718612966,
Web: www.ddslt.com

Mobile: +8801718612966,
Web: www.ddslt.com
5.3 Serviceability check (Existing Condition)
Horizontal Vertical Horizontal

Node L/C X in Y in Z in
Max X 63 36 DL+WXZ- 6.957 -0.007 18.603
Min X 53 33 DL+WX -6.758 0.004 -11.74
Max Y 83 35 DL+WZ 0.537 2.61 -14.488
Min Y 75 36 DL+WXZ- 2.087 -0.205 12.154
Max Z 15 36 DL+WXZ- 0.01 0.003 21.457
Min Z 54 35 DL+WZ -2.155 0.002 -19.659
Max rX 18 36 DL+WXZ- 0.017 0.002 18.91
Min rX 10 33 DL+WX -0.717 0.004 -3.197
Max rY 8 33 DL+WX -0.72 0.001 -2.205
Min rY 9 34 DL+WX- 0.708 0.002 -3.609
Max rZ 64 35 DL+WZ -1.67 -0.002 -18.779
Min rZ 54 36 DL+WXZ- 6.909 0.015 18.487
Max Rst 15 36 DL+WXZ- 0.01 0.003 21.457
Maximum lateral displacement=6.95 inch

Maximum allowable lateral displacement=h/60=23.50*12/60=4.7 inch
Hence lateral displacement not controlled.
Serviceability check (After Retrofit Condition)
Horizontal Vertical Horizontal

Node L/C X in Y in Z in
Max X 64 36 DL+WXZ- 1.263 0.004 3.68
Min X 54 33 DL+WX -1.138 0.006 -1.918
Max Y 83 33 DL+WX -0.106 1.221 -1.138
Min Y 34 35 DL+WZ 0.498 -0.009 -1.159
Max Z 64 36 DL+WXZ- 1.263 0.004 3.68
Min Z 64 35 DL+WZ -0.901 0.002 -3.909
Max rX 89 36 DL+WXZ- 0 0 0
Min rX 78 35 DL+WZ -0.482 0.366 -2.85
Max rY 30 34 DL+WX- 0.319 0.005 0.113
Min rY 53 34 DL+WX- 0.201 0 -0.107
Max rZ 83 33 DL+WX -0.106 1.221 -1.138
Min rZ 86 33 DL+WX -0.143 1.017 -0.256
Max Rst 64 35 DL+WZ -0.901 0.002 -3.909
Maximum lateral displacement=1.263 inch

Maximum allowable lateral displacement=h/60=24.00*12/60=4.8 inch
Hence lateral displacement is controlled after retrofit.
Mobile: +8801718612966,
Web: www.ddslt.com
5.4 Foundation Adequacy check:

Mobile: +8801718612966,
Web: www.ddslt.com
Comments: Foundation is adequate to carry prescribed loading.

Mobile: +8801718612966,
Web: www.ddslt.com
8.0 Conclusion & Recommendation:

1. Lateral displacements exceed the allowable limit.
2. Due to lateral loading a few section are failed. So additional strengthening system has been
provided.
3. RCC beam, column & foundation system is adequate to carry prescribed loading.
Thanking You
Md. Abdul Quddus

B.Sc Engg. (Civil, BUET)
MIEB-21384, DMINB/CE-0231
CEO & Structural Designer
DESIGN & DEVELOPMENT SOLUTION
Attachments:
1.0 Plate test report
2.0 As-built Drawing
3.0 Proposed Retrofitting Drawing
Page
2
Page
3
Page
4
Page
5
Page
6
Page
7
Page
8
Page
9
Page
10
Page
11
Page
12
Page
13
Page
14
Page
15
Page
16
Page
17
Page
18
Page
19
Page
20
Page
21
Page
22
Page
23
Page
24
Page
25
Page
26
Page
27
Page
28
Page
29
Page
30
Page
31
Page
32
Page
33
Page
34
Page
35
Page
36
Page
37
Page
38
Page
39
Page
40
Page
41
Page
42
Page
43
Page
44
Page
45
Page
46
Page
47

Repport Steel Structure PDF

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Исходное описание:

Оригинальное название

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Repport Steel Structure PDF

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

ENGINREERING ASSESSMENT REPORT

NAME OF THE PROJECT:

Date of Submission: 05.02.18 Submitted By:

Name of the Submitting Engineer

Engr. Abdul Quddus

2.0) SCOPE OF WORK

 Arranged As-Built Drawing.

Produced retrofitting drawing where required

3.0) WORK METHEDOLOGY

4.0) STRUCTURAL DESIGN CONCEPT & CRITERIA

4.1) CODES AND STANDARDS

4.2) GENERAL LOAD DATA

Pz=CgCpCcCiCzVb2 [BNBC, 2.4.6.2,2.4.6.3 Page-6-33,6-34]

Wind load was applied in two orthogonal directions X and Y.

Roof Slope (theta) 6 degree

OUR H/L 0.2293712 -0.7 -0.9 -0.82

Earth quake Load:

4.3) LOAD APPLIED ON STRUCTURE

i. Live load on roof=0.5KN/m2

Wind load was applied in two orthogonal directions X and Z.

Earth quake load was applied in two orthogonal directions X & Z.

4.4.1 Load Symbol

4.4.2 Load Combination (Alliance Standard)

4.4.3 Load Combination (BNBC Standard)

4.5 Material Data

The following strength parameter is considered for assessment of building

01 Flexural strength of Steel Section 50,000 Psi

4.6) METHOD OF ANALYSIS AND SOFTWARE USED:

We used STADD Pro V8i for analysis

5.0 ADEQUACY CHECK

5.1 Member Adequacy check(Before retrofitting)

Member capacity ratio. (Present condition)

Analysis Design Actual Allowable Normalized Ratio

51 Taper Taper 0.636 1 0.636 LRFD-H1-1B-C

Comments: Several members are inadequate. Inadequate members are proposed to

5.2 Member Adequacy check(After Retrofitting)

Member capacity ratio. (After retrofitting condition)

51 Taper Taper 0.162 1 0.162 LRFD-H1-1B-T

5.3 Serviceability check (Existing Condition)

Horizontal Vertical Horizontal

Maximum lateral displacement=6.95 inch

Serviceability check (After Retrofit Condition)

Horizontal Vertical Horizontal

Maximum lateral displacement=1.263 inch

5.4 Foundation Adequacy check:

Comments: Foundation is adequate to carry prescribed loading.

8.0 Conclusion & Recommendation:

Md. Abdul Quddus

Вам также может понравиться