Digital Stockholm Syndrome in the Post-Ontological Age
()
About this ebook
Once, humans were what they believed. Now, the modern person is determined by data exhaust-an invisible anthropocentric ether of ones and zeros that is a product of our digitally monitored age. Author Mark Jarzombek argues that the world has become redesigned to fuse the algorithmic with the ontological, and the discussion of ontology must be up
Related to Digital Stockholm Syndrome in the Post-Ontological Age
Related ebooks
In the Dust of This Planet: Horror of Philosophy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5UNIFIED - COSMOS, LIFE, PURPOSE: Communicating with the Unified Source Field & How This Can Guide Our Lives Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5From the ‘Neutral’ Body to the Postmodern Cyborg: A Critique of Gender Ideology Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Posthuman Condition: Consciousness Beyond the Brain Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Trajectory of Humanity: Towards a New Arcadia? Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsZen and the Art of Funk Capitalism: A General Theory of Fallibility Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSolovki's Ersatz: On the Evolution of Modern Human Brain Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBehind Civilisation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMy Emergent God: The Urgent Need for a Science Manifesto Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBeyond Binary: Navigating the Era of New Age Artificial Intelligence Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Crowd & The Psychology of Revolution: Two Classics on Understanding the Mob Mentality and Its Motivations Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Mob Mentality: The Crowd & The Psychology of Revolution Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Struggle for a Human Future: 5G, Augmented Reality and the Internet of Things Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMeaning: the History of Western Philosophy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Origins of Liberty: An Essay in Platonic Ontology Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Crowd Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Crowd A Study of the Popular Mind Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Radical Singularity: Essay on Singular Phenomena Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Technology & Spirituality: How the Information Revolution Affects Our Spiritual Lives Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuantum Shift in the Global Brain: How the New Scientific Reality Can Change Us and Our World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Homo Dominus: A Theory of Human Evolution Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHow to Solve the World's Problems in 50 Years or Less: Manifesto for Revolution Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsYour Choice: Analogue opportunist or progressive optimist? An invitation to participate in system change Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Journey of the Dialectic: Knowing God, Volume 3 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTechnology vs. Humanity: The Coming Clash Between Man and Machine Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Mind in the Making: The Relation of Intelligence to Social Reform Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Reality Of Our Natures And The Nature Of Our Realities The Reality Of Our Natures And The Nature Of Our Realities: TROONATNOOR Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Call To Reason Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Teaching Methods & Materials For You
Jack Reacher Reading Order: The Complete Lee Child’s Reading List Of Jack Reacher Series Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Grit: The Power of Passion and Perseverance Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Dumbing Us Down - 25th Anniversary Edition: The Hidden Curriculum of Compulsory Schooling Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Speed Reading: Learn to Read a 200+ Page Book in 1 Hour: Mind Hack, #1 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Verbal Judo, Second Edition: The Gentle Art of Persuasion Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Lies My Teacher Told Me: Everything Your American History Textbook Got Wrong Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Principles: Life and Work Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Fluent in 3 Months: How Anyone at Any Age Can Learn to Speak Any Language from Anywhere in the World Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Weapons of Mass Instruction: A Schoolteacher's Journey Through the Dark World of Compulsory Schooling Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Personal Finance for Beginners - A Simple Guide to Take Control of Your Financial Situation Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Financial Feminist: Overcome the Patriarchy's Bullsh*t to Master Your Money and Build a Life You Love Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The 5 Love Languages of Children: The Secret to Loving Children Effectively Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Becoming Cliterate: Why Orgasm Equality Matters--And How to Get It Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Raising Human Beings: Creating a Collaborative Partnership with Your Child Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Closing of the American Mind Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A study guide for Frank Herbert's "Dune" Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Inside American Education Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Lost Tools of Learning Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Science of Making Friends: Helping Socially Challenged Teens and Young Adults Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Everything You Need to Know About Personal Finance in 1000 Words Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Three Bears Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5How to Take Smart Notes. One Simple Technique to Boost Writing, Learning and Thinking Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Chicago Guide to Grammar, Usage, and Punctuation Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A Failure of Nerve: Leadership in the Age of the Quick Fix (10th Anniversary, Revised Edition) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Good to Great: Why Some Companies Make the Leap...And Others Don't Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Who Gets In and Why: A Year Inside College Admissions Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The 5 Love Languages of Teenagers: The Secret to Loving Teens Effectively Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for Digital Stockholm Syndrome in the Post-Ontological Age
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Digital Stockholm Syndrome in the Post-Ontological Age - Mark Jarzombek
About the Author
Mark Jarzombek is a Professor of history and theory of architecture at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, where he has been teaching since 1995. He has authored several books on a wide range of subjects including in the area of digital philosophy. He is the co-founder along with Vikram Prakash of the Office of (Un)certainty Research, a design practice dedicated to rethinking architecture in terms of the emergent scientific, social and political parameters of the 21st century.
About the Book
No one disputes the fact that we live in a Digital Age. But unlike the transition into the Modern Age and the advent of various types of machines and technologies – a transition that we could see and experience as different and alienating – the transition into the Digital Age has been more insidious. Where exactly do we locate it? And when did it even become the norm?
Today, the world of algorithms is almost completely invisible to the common person and yet is already everywhere. If there is no ‘outside’, how then do we assess the traditional relationship between the Human and the Technological? How do we understand our sense of Self?
In this book, I argue that the study of Being calls for a new type of science, the subject of which is algorithmic ontology in which the human is being pushed to its corporeal, sensate, moral, physical, psychological, political, social, environmental, sexual, bacteriological or global limits.
In a way, we are now more Human than ever before, and yet what we mean by Human is becoming increasingly illusive since the glue that holds all this together is a finely constructed type of hallucinogenic paranoia that speaks to us at different registers of reality.
This book outlines the path that brought us here and explores different ways that data and humans are enmeshed in a spiral of dependency.
In contrast to the outdated Three Laws of Robotics, I propose an alternative three laws as a way to describe the nature of this inter-dependency. These laws are thermodynamic in nature since the algorithmic world is a heat-producing-seeking world that produces, captures, and exploits the life pulse of data.
Introduction
Immanuel Kant, writing at the end of the eighteenth century, defined the parameters of the modern sense of personhood by replacing the standard assumption of the superiority of the soul over the body with a more complex entanglement built around an innate sense of unity.
No one is immediately conscious of a particular place in his body, but only the one that he as a human being occupies with respect to the world around him. . . . Where I feel, there I am. I am just as immediately in my fingertips as in my head. It is myself whose heel hurts and whose heart beats with emotion. When my corn aches, I feel the painful impression not in a brain nerve but at the end of my toe. . . . My soul is wholly in my whole body and wholly in each of its parts.¹ [Kant’s emphasis]
So powerful was this claim that it remained a key element of nineteenth and twentieth-century philosophy and was just as foundational to the dialectic of Hegel as to the psycho-historicism of Dilthey. It reached its most extreme figuration in Heidegger’s claim that the original act of building, bauen, derived from nothing less—and nothing more!—than Ich bin. The claim also produced a vast symptomology to describe conditions that did not fit the mold, schizophrenia, mood disorders, psychosis, paranoia, bipolarism, etc., all of which become ‘scientifically’ verifiable proof in the negative of the more elusive existence of the modern notion of a stable and unified Self.
We are now in a situation where the discussion of ontology has to be updated. The world is designed from the macro to the micro/molecular level to fuse the algorithmic with the ontological. The result is a digitally monitored, pharma-corrected, ontic-ecology now common to many people across the globe, not just the wealthy and not just those savvy in the ways of the computer. The modern duality of the stable and the unstable when talking about the Self is increasingly revealed as little more than an artifice: a convenience.
This book is, however, not about the media/digital world of gaming and gadgets, nor is it about the geopolitics of globalization. It asks a more personal question and tries to do so without first judging who we are or what we have now become. It used to be that we were what we believed, or we were what we ate. Now, we are determined by what data experts call our data exhaust—or, as I would like to call it, ontic exhaust. We participate in this exhaust-making willingly and unwillingly, wittingly and unwittingly, purposefully and accidentally. The word exhaust is, of course, a misdirect. Unlike car exhaust that dissipates into the atmosphere, this exhaust is meticulously scrutinized, packaged, formatted, processed, sold, and resold to come back to us in the form of entertainment, social media, apps, health insurance, clickbait, data contracts, and the like.
Without this invisible ether of one and zeros, the world as we know it would, in fact, cease to function. It is the new oxygen, and everyone—and every thing—has to be dedicated to its production and maintenance. Unlike oxygen, which came into existence long before humans, this new substance is anthropocentric in that its production is a global/human enterprise. The individual, the corporation, the nation-state, and thousands of nameless hackers are increasingly shaping a destiny with an unknown proportion and an unknown termination date.
Though computers have been around for a while, this circulational condition has only emerged in the last five or so years, meaning that one has to completely rethink the philosophical and anthropological basis of our ontology and to do so without applying the lens of either victimhood or opportunity, the two modalities that are alien to this discussion. I do not, however, proclaim neutrality. Far from it. The questions are: What is this new ontology? What were the historical situations that produced it? And how do we adjust to the realities of our new Self? Only with these questions at least partially answered can we begin to develop a more substantial critique of the positional paradoxes that define the problem of Being.
Being Global
Global was born in the age of aeronautics and Sputnik, with great circles wheeling around the planet bereft of topographical restrictions. Global back then implied something visceral about movement, maintained in the world of tourism, commerce, and overnight shipping. Increasingly, however, global has become a parasitic adjective: global industries, global science, global news, global education, global exchange, global warming, global imperialism, global war on terror, global markets, global jihadism, global integration, etc. How many globals can a person comprehend? We live in a globalized world of global globalism.
All these globals are the noisy symptom of an otherwise relatively quiet transformation that has taken place. For there is another global in all of this for which the word global does not, however, appear. It is the I
made global not by how much the I
travels or where its clothes are made, and not necessarily by the fact that the I
owns an iPhone or iPad, but by a universe of anonymously implemented firmware, software, trackware, ransomware, trialware, malware, pirateware, and shareware. The intermediaries are the satellites hovering above the planet. They are what make us global — what make me global.
Is there some way to reflect on this positioning/de-positioning as a question of Being?
At first, it might seem that we should focus on someone who is savvy about emerging technologies, digital media, and a so-called culture of connectivity. Perhaps this is a person who travels a lot, a businessperson who understands to some degree the necessity if not the logic of capital, reads from his or her tablet, and worries about the next Global Crisis. A Hilton Cosmopolitan. Liberals would hope that this person is sensitive to the economic exploitation of capital. Conservatives would hope that this person enjoys making money. It doesn’t matter. There is more to it than that. We see in the last years a new ontology, one that is not the classic Being-in-the-World (Plato and Buddha); not the modernist Being-in-the-World (Hegel, Nietzsche, and Heidegger), not the techno-liberated-performative cyborg of the 1990s; and not just a member of Facebook Universe. It is a new creature altogether, a new Being.
Without getting too complicated, let’s say that the word Being points to life, to our social constructions, and to a sense of identity in the world, whether valid or not, whether validated or not. Needless to say, most philosophy, whether eastern or western, has tried to mold Being in a particular way. All philosophy operates on Being. Better said: Being is constructed by a philosophy to be vulnerable to the operations of philosophy. As a result, Being is continuously told what to do, what to eat, how to work, how to behave, how to think, how to have sex, if at all, and inevitably how to think of oneself as superior.
So much for the past! Being today is moving on. It is