Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
1. Why CEBP?
Ian Tan
MRCP(UK), FHKCA, HKCA(IntCare), FANZCA, FFICANZCA, FJFIntCareMed
70
60
50
40 late starters
30 early starters
20
10
0
Days of CRRT
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Hospital LOS (days) 50.3 (43.4) 46.2 (37.0) 53.0 (47.4) 0.46
Duration of CRRT (days) 19.2 (16.5) 17.7 (15.1) 20.2 (17.5) 0.45
Number of CRRT days 18.8 (16.3) 17.6 (15.2) 19.6 (17.1) 0.55
Survival (%) 28.0 39 20.3 0.04
Recovery of renal function (%) 96.4 100 91.6 0.25
Gettings, et al. Outcome in post-traumatic acute renal failure when continuous renal
replacement is applied early vs. late. Intensive Care Med 1999;25:805
RCT n=425, AP2 23, lactate, PS, urea 18, Cox
45 ml/h/kg
35 ml/h/kg
25 ml/h/kg
BUN at start of CVVH: hazard ratio 1.05
Survivors Non Survivors
80
p < 0.01 p < 0.01 p < 0.01
70
Blood Urea Nitrogen (mg/dl)
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Group 1 Group 2 Group 3
Ronco C, et al. Effects of different doses in continuous veno-venous haemofiltration on
outcomes of acute renal failure: a prospective randomised trial. Lancet 2000;355:26-30
using urea as surrogate for timing
R, I
F, L, E
Retrospective
N = 40 + 40
EIHF: 45 ml/h/kg x6h
then 20 ml/h/kg
Within 12h of ICU admission
EIHF control
MV wean 70% 37%
MV duration/d 11 20
Pressor off 75% 25%
Hosp LOS 19 34
Control: 20 ml/h/kg
renal failure criteria
LATE EARLY
BUN>84 Urine<100ml/8h N = 64
Cr>2.8 observational
K>6
Also lower:
LOS ICU & hospital
MOF incidence