0 views

Uploaded by Inês Guimarães

fghjkl

- Magellan Explor is t 600 Manual
- p101chap05pretest
- Tech Seminar Vijay01
- Missile Application Condensed Message Format
- Vaibhav Singh D WACI 1 (2)
- Notice: Aeronautical land-use assurance; waivers: RTCA, Inc.
- Specification (Sirius Drone)
- Print
- A SECURED STRATEGIC APPROACH FOR MONITORING VESSELS ON SEA WITH ALERT NOTIFICAtION USING DGPS.
- Craig Callender - Time in Physics (Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Volume 09)
- Lec10_TLT5606_S
- 11_4_Implementation of GPS for Location Tracking
- BU303-353_Win_UsersGuide-V2.5
- Car speed control by bluetooth
- Identification of Homoeopathic Medicine
- Astronautics - II (ICE – 504)
- GPS System.pdf
- Notice: Meetings; Sunshine Act
- Extended Essay Online
- B4

You are on page 1of 4

Externato Delfim Ferreira

Rua das Pombinhas, 4765-227

Riba d’Ave

Keywords Special relativity • General relativity • Global Positioning System • GPS • Time dilation

ABSTRACT: In this paper, we will discuss the effects of special and general relativity on the Global Positioning System (GPS). It

is is based on time and the known position of twenty-four satellites, which carry atomic clocks for precise time measuring. These

extremely accurate clocks are synchronized to each other and also to clocks in the Earth’s surface. This synchronization is achieved

by taking in account the effect of time dilations predicted in Einstein’s theories.

Einstein’s theory of relativity is far from being useless by receiving stations around the world and sent to a master

and merely theoretical. In the present article, we will look control station, where the computations related to the orbits

at how the predicted effects are merged into the Global and clock performance are computed. (Ashby, N. 2006.

Relativistic effects in the Global Positioning System)

Positioning System, analyzing both time dilation and gravi-

tational frequency shifts. If these weren’t taken in to ac-

3. Relativity principles

count, the GPS wouldn’t be reliable at all. Furthermore, the

steadiness of light’s velocity is vital for navigation. The As far as the GP system is concerned, both the effects

relativity of simultaneity and the constancy of 𝑐 are closely of special relativity and general relativity must be consid-

linked. This principle is also related to the Sagnac effect, ered, as mentioned before. Having this said, we will first

involved in the synchronization of clocks in the vicinity of take a look at special relativity, mentioning the postulates

earth and useful when matching clocks that have at least inherent to such principle. Firstly, in all inertial reference

one or more GPS satellites in sight at the same time, even if frames, that is, referential with null acceleration, the laws

they are thousands of kilometers apart. Having this in mind, of physics behave in the exact same way. Secondly, the

it is then possible to attain the first order amendment of the speed of light, c, has always the same value (approximately

time part of the Lorentz transformations. Finally, the theory 3.00×10! m/s). Finally, it is not possible to distinguish

of general relativity will give us the necessary insight to gravitational fields due to mass and caused by acceleration,

derive the gravitational frequency shift. considering a tiny region of time and space (Ashby, N.

2006. Relativistic effects in the Global Positioning System,

Our objective in the present paper is not to obtain ex- p. 2).

tremely precise values, since we will focus on the causes of In the GPS, if we consider the Earth-Centered Inertial

the synchronization errors and not in how to correct them. (ECI), whose coordinate frames have their origins at the

This way, the values that will appear throughout the paper Earth’s center of mass, it can be assumed, without adverse

could be a little more accurate.

effect, that the law of inertia still holds. This means that,

2. The fundamentals of the GPS unless acted upon by an unbalanced force, a body will pre-

serve its velocity and direction. That is of utter importance

The satellites that make up this system orbit the Earth since, in the ECI frame, the speed of light is fundamentally

at an altitude of approximately 20200 kilometers and at a constant, although the earth is accelerated concerning the

velocity close to 4 km/s. Furthermore, the orbital period of sun.

each satellite is one-half a sidereal day, that is, 11 hours

and 58 minutes. They carry with them an atomic clock 4. Relativity of simultaneity

whose accuracy is of 1 nanosecond (109 seconds). A GPS

It is also very important to acknowledge that the syn-

receiver determines the current position and heading by

chronization of the clock nets is contingent to the state of

making a comparison between the time signals it receives

motion of the viewer. Consider a bar with length x that is in

from at least four satellites and their positions. The data

motion with velocity v relative to the S referential (the

1

“moving” frame) and in the S’ referential the observers are 5. Time Dilation

at rest relative to the bar (see Figure 1 below). Suppose that

a light signal is sent from the left side of the bar and moves This concept is a direct consequence of Einstein’s

towards its right end. For the observer in the S’ referential, Special Relativity, and can easily be derived via the follow-

the time it takes for the light to travel from one side to an- ing thought experiment: consider two entities, Tintin, at

other (t’) is equal to rest, watching his dog, Milou, passing by in the X direction

inside a rocket with constant velocity 𝑣. Inside the rocket,

𝑥 there’s a time measuring mechanism, that functions based

𝑡! =

𝑐 on how long light takes from being emitted by the laser A

at the instant 𝑡 = 𝑡’ = 0 to being received at B.

However, the person in the S referential observes that

the light wave is reaching the right end of the bar with a In his inertial reference frame, S’, Milou measures this

relative speed 𝑐 − 𝑣. Thus, the time (t) required is given by !

time as 𝑡’ = ó 𝐷 = 𝑐 ∙ 𝑡’, with D being the separation

!

𝑥 𝑥 ! 𝑥 𝑣𝑥 between the “clock” components (drawn with red in Figure

𝑡= = ∙ (1 − ! )!! ≈ + !

𝑐−𝑣 𝑐 𝑐 𝑐 2).

the light not only going upwards but also sideways, just as

𝑣𝑥

𝑡 − 𝑡! = (1) everything inside the rocket. Because of this, he sees light

𝑐! travel a diagonal path (drawn with green) of length 𝑐 ∙ 𝑡. At

In conclusion, if two observers were in relative mo- the same time, he watches as the rocket moves by, chang-

tion, even if their clocks were set equal initially, at the arri- ing his position along the X-axis by 𝑣 ∙ 𝑡.

val of the light wave they wouldn’t be.

These three distances mentioned form a right-angled

triangle so, by using Pythagoras’ Theorem, we get to

1 𝑣!

𝑡! = 𝑡 . ≈𝑡− 𝑡∙ !

𝛾 2𝑐

(or that 𝑡 = 1),

𝑡! − 𝑡 𝑣!

=− !

Figure 1: the moving bar thought experiment 𝑡 2𝑐

!"

The relativity of simultaneity is also strongly related we get that the frequency shift, , between the two refer-

!

to the so-called Sagnac effect. Imagine that individuals on ential is equal to

Earth’s equator try to synchronize a net system of clocks

that are placed throughout the equator, by sending a light 𝑑𝑓 1 𝑣!

= − !

wave all the way once across with a system of mirrors. The 𝑓 2𝑐

radius of our planet around the equator is approximately

equal to ℓ = 6378.137 km, therefore the perimeter of the This simple expression tells us that the time measured

equatorial circumference is given by 2𝜋ℓ. To viewers on in the GPS atomic clocks, moving at approximately

the rotating Earth, it seems that it takes

!!ℓ

seconds for the 𝑣 = 4000 𝑚/𝑠, will differ from that measured by a stand-

!

ing observer on Earth, rotating with a radius of ℓ =

light signal to circulate once around. However, for a person

in a local, yet non-rotating frame, the beginning point 6378 𝑘𝑚 and with angular velocity 𝜔 = 7.29 × 10! rad/s,

!!ℓ !!"ℓ!

by

moves a distance 𝜔ℓ ∙ = during that time, where

! !

!!

𝜔 = 7.291151467 × 10 rad/s is the angular velocity of 𝑑𝑓 1 𝑣! 1 𝜔ℓ !

= − !− − ≈ −8.228 ×10!!!

the Earth’s rotation. This implies that the extra time the 𝑓 2𝑐 2 𝑐!

signal takes to finish the course is given by

Multiplying this value by the number of seconds in a

2𝜔𝜋ℓ! day and by 𝑐, we get, approximately, a mind-blowing

𝑡 − 𝑡! =

𝑐! 2.1326 km, which is too big of an error to ever be obtained

in a positioning system.

which makes total sense, according to the previously de-

duced equation (1). This discrepancy is of the uttermost

importance to compare remotely located clocks, such as the

ones present in the GPS.

2

ber like the one obtained in equation (2), we get a deviation

of about 13,7 𝑘𝑚.

7. Net Effect

net frequency shift by simply adding up equations (2) and

(5). The result can be further modified by considering that

the satellites describe orbits that are approximately Kep-

lerian and applying energy to these, from which we get

!

𝑑𝑓 2𝐺𝑀 1 1 3𝐺𝑀 𝐺𝑀 𝜉 1 𝜔ℓ

= − ! − − + 1+ + ∙

𝑓 𝑐 𝑟 𝑡 𝑎 2𝑐 ! 𝑎 ℓ𝑐 ! 2 2 𝑐!

Figure 2: the rocket light clock thought experiment

where a represents the semi-major axis of the satellite’s

orbit (see Ashby, N. 2006. Relativistic effects in the Global

6. Gravitational frequency shift Positioning System, p. 15)

Using the result we derived in equation (1) together

The first term of this equation relates to how much the

with an accelerating frame of reference, based on the prin-

orbit deviates from a perfect circumference, the second and

ciple of equivalence, it’s possible to relate the gravitational

!" third to the gravitational effect on time measurements and

frequency shift, with the gravitation potential difference the last one represents the effect of time dilation to the fre-

!

between two observers, ∆𝜑 (Ashby, N. 2006. Relativistic quency shift.

effects in the Global Positioning System, p. 10) using

Considering a perfectly circular orbit, the first term is

𝑑𝑓 ∆𝜑 nulled, and by replacing the remaining values we get to a

= ! (2) result

𝑓 𝑐

𝑑𝑓

with 𝜑 being, for the satellite, with reasonable error, in = 4.4647 × 10!!"

𝑓

terms of the orbit’s radius, 𝑟(𝑡), and the product of the uni-

versal gravitation constant with Earth’s mass, which values This fact is compensated by taking frequency

approximately 3.986 ×10!" 𝑚 ! /𝑠 ! , (Ashby, N. 2006. Rel- measures of the clocks after the satellite’s launch and send-

ativistic effects in the Global Positioning System, pp. 10- ing adjustment signals.

11)

𝜑 𝑡 = − (3) lar orbits, and so a periodic deviation in the frequency shift

𝑟 𝑡 is caused due to the change in relative velocity and gravita-

However, for a clock located at the equator, an ad- tional potential. Thus, a correction must be applied, either

justment is needed because of Earth’s shape, and its poten- by the satellite, changing the information sent in the elec-

tial ends up being tromagnetic signal emitted, or by the receptor, taking this

into account in its calculations.

𝐺𝑀 𝜉

𝜑!" = − ∙ 1+ (4) There is also a frequency shift due to orbital adjust-

ℓ 2

ments, which we won’t be discussing here (see Ashby, N.

Where ℓ represents Earth’s radius and 𝜉 = 1.0863× Relativistic effects on SV clocks due to orbit changes, and

10!! the Earth’s quadrupole moment coefficient (Ashby, due to Earth’s oblateness)

N. 2006. Relativistic effects in the Global Positioning Sys-

tem, p. 11). 8. Conclusion

Taking equations (3) and (4) into account, we can cal- To summarize, it is mandatory to take into account

culate the expected frequency shift Einstein’s theory of relativity when synchronizing the ex-

tremely precise atomic clocks that compose the satellites of

𝑑𝑓 𝜑 𝑡 − 𝜑!" 𝐺𝑀 𝐺𝑀 𝜉 the Global Positioning System with the ones located at

= !

= − !

− − ! ∙ 1+ Earth’s surface.

𝑓 𝑐 𝑟 𝑡 𝑐 ℓ𝑐 2

Simultaneity and the Sagnac effect, we were able to clinch

assuming that 𝑟 𝑡 remains constant, that is, the orbit the that if two viewers are in relative motion, then times passes

satellite describes is perfectly circular. Treating this num- differently for both. These concepts, related to the Doppler

3

Effect in an accelerated frame of reference, told us that this

system is under a gravitational frequency shift relative to

the Earth, predicted by General Relativity.

tivity, with its intrinsic time dilation consequences, which

also cause a frequency shift between clocks on the system’s

satellites and located on Earth’s surface.

ly equal to 11.5725 kilometers each day, which is an error

that cannot simply be disregarded. For instance, at the end

of an uncorrected day, our school would magically move to

Guimarães.

REFERENCES

ASHBY, N. 2006. Relativistic Effects in the Global Positio-

ning System. Department of Physics, University of Colorado

Boulder, CO 80309-0390.

ASHBY, N. 2006. Relativistic effects on SV clocks due to

orbit changes, and due to Earth’s oblateness. Department

of Physics, UCB 390 University of Colorado, Boulder, CO

80309-0390

POGGE, R. 2006. Astronomy 162: Introduction to Stars,

Galaxies, & the Universe. Retrieved from

http://www.astronomy.ohio-

state.edu/~pogge/Ast162/Unit5/gps.html

TARANTOLA, A., et. al. 2005. Gravimetry, Relativity,

and the Global Navigation Satellite Systems.

- Magellan Explor is t 600 ManualUploaded bydanielavero
- p101chap05pretestUploaded bylenin323
- Tech Seminar Vijay01Uploaded byVijay Chinna
- Missile Application Condensed Message FormatUploaded bynmf77
- Vaibhav Singh D WACI 1 (2)Uploaded byvaibhav singh
- Notice: Aeronautical land-use assurance; waivers: RTCA, Inc.Uploaded byJustia.com
- Specification (Sirius Drone)Uploaded byAdrian Guerra Medrano
- PrintUploaded byJayson Snivellus Abojado
- A SECURED STRATEGIC APPROACH FOR MONITORING VESSELS ON SEA WITH ALERT NOTIFICAtION USING DGPS.Uploaded byIJSTE
- Craig Callender - Time in Physics (Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Volume 09)Uploaded bypapus_adju
- Lec10_TLT5606_SUploaded byShri
- 11_4_Implementation of GPS for Location TrackingUploaded byNarendra Jadhav
- BU303-353_Win_UsersGuide-V2.5Uploaded byFouad Tehari
- Car speed control by bluetoothUploaded byAniruddha Duggani
- Identification of Homoeopathic MedicineUploaded byDT
- Astronautics - II (ICE – 504)Uploaded byRavishanker Baliga
- GPS System.pdfUploaded byMd. Latifur Rahman
- Notice: Meetings; Sunshine ActUploaded byJustia.com
- Extended Essay OnlineUploaded byupgrade7
- B4Uploaded byamin
- Gis ApllicationUploaded byAbhi Manu
- GPS 320BUploaded byarlindojl
- 6671Uploaded bydilsharakavi
- Seeking ObjectsUploaded bytommehedinti
- Design and Implementation of Autonomous Maneuvering Robotic Vehicle Using Global Positioning System for Jamming the Communication During WarfareUploaded byInternational Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology
- TIA-916Uploaded byEduardo Cudia
- Presentation Notes on IT in Automobile 1Uploaded byNilesh Narkar
- Explanation of Special RelativityUploaded byMuhammad Mosa
- file1-20090714-151524Uploaded byThao Tha
- Differential Access Points for Indoor Location EstimationUploaded byjulyfame

- 18_Prefácio How to Lie With StatisticsUploaded bypattyest
- atividademeninosUploaded byInês Guimarães
- 712 - Economia A.pdfUploaded byInês Guimarães
- a comprehensive introduction to differential geometryUploaded bykladjfklsdflkdnf
- iyou9Uploaded byInês Guimarães
- 12.2_InêsGuimarães_CorImagemUploaded byInês Guimarães
- Vegan InfoUploaded byInês Guimarães
- ReadmeUploaded byInês Guimarães
- Gin·Sio MentalUploaded byInês Guimarães
- Colorações-0.1Uploaded byInês Guimarães
- UntitledUploaded byFátima Santos
- 712 - Economia AUploaded byInês Guimarães

- Principles of Chem 01 Mendu of tUploaded byMartinAlfons
- NonlinUploaded byPeter Yacsa
- Team 6.pptUploaded byDaniel Enrique Santos Duarte
- 2_M.Sc. I Chemistry (Dept.) 2014.pdfUploaded byamolking
- Mathematical ProblemUploaded byMrinmoy Rahman
- Syllabus.pdfUploaded bymounika_po
- Con Cent Eric Tube Heat ExchangerUploaded byAmr Banawan
- photon observation.pdfUploaded byDamean Samuel
- RADULESCU S.pdf 8 12.pdfUploaded byRamiro Arcentales
- Simulation Analysis and Application of Hot Rolled Large Size H-beamsUploaded bySEP-Publisher
- Vented Brake RotorUploaded bysonirocks
- Mecanica da FraturaUploaded byLarissa Medeiros
- Differential Geometry, Theory and Applications (Contemporary Applied Mathematics) (Philippe G Ciarlet, Ta-Tsien Li) 9812771468Uploaded byKassala Halnga
- G-59 and G-83 Protection Requirements - LondonUploaded bySethu Ratnam
- Waves for studentUploaded bySalahuddin Abdullah
- solved problems and sheet.docUploaded bySafaa Hameed Al Nasery
- Activities Guide and Evaluation Rubric - Step 2 - To Recognize the Electrodynamic and Waves Applications (1)Uploaded byYhoan Estiven Cabezas Falla
- subject-verb agreement exercises.docUploaded byLeslie Romero
- PChem3710-2017Fall_Chapter02Uploaded byedomin00
- SP260-166Uploaded byvijay k
- annual-scheme-2016.pdfUploaded byAarohan Vashishta
- Ate QuizUploaded byRicardo Veloz
- Stop 1Uploaded byanthony bamugo
- Ducting Insulation thickness calculation sheet SEND.xlsUploaded byA Nguyễn
- CE458 Chapter 5Uploaded byMihai Mihailescu
- ANSYS Mapped MeshingUploaded byJefri Bale
- 2.2.38 ConductivityUploaded byMulayam Singh Yadav
- Case Study: pelican robotUploaded byMøhãmêdŸøušêf
- 4029INSTRUMENTTRANSFORMERS .pptUploaded bymuaz_aminu1422
- GTS_NX_Modules.pdfUploaded byrlpr